List of comparisons between Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Intel Core i5-4000
|
|
|
|
|
List of comparisons between Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Intel Core i5-4000
List of comparisons of technical characteristics between the processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 and the processors group Intel Core i5-4000, with also the respective performance in the benchmarks. Click on one of the links to access the desired comparison.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Comparisons:
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4690S | 4 | 4 | 2. |
2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3200 | 3900 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4690K | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3500 | 3900 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4690 | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3500 | 3900 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4670K | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3400 | 3800 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4670 | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3400 | 3800 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4590T | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2000 | 3000 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4590S | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3000 | 3700 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4590 | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3300 | 3700 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4570T | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2900 | 3600 | 4000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4570S | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2900 | 3600 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4570 | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3200 | 3600 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4460T | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1900 | 2700 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4460S | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2900 | 3400 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4460 | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3200 | 3400 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4440S | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2800 | 3300 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4440 | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3100 | 3300 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4430 | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3000 | 3200 | 6000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4310U | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2000 | 3000 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4310M | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2700 | 3400 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-430M | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2260 | 2530 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4308U | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2800 | 3300 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4300U | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1900 | 2900 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4300M | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2600 | 3300 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4278U | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2600 | 3100 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4260U | 4 | 4 | 2. 4 |
2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1400 | 2700 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4258U | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2400 | 2900 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4250U | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1300 | 2600 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4210U | 4 | 4 | 2. |
2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1700 | 2700 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4210M | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2600 | 3200 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4210H | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2900 | 3500 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4200U | 4 | 4 | 2. |
2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1600 | 2600 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4200M | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2500 | 3100 | 3000 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core i5-4200H | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2800 | 3400 | 3000 |
AMD A8-5550M vs Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 — VsRank
Advantages
General information
Technical specifications
RAM Built-in GPU Advanced technologies
Cinebench tests Geekbench tests Other tests
AMD A8-5550M
AMD A8-5550M win!
Number of points: 7291
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 lost!
Number of points: 6699
- +3100 MHz processor turbo clock advantage
- By 70 W less power consumption
- By 33 nm less technological process
- Has a built-in Radeon HD 8550G graphics processor
- There is an extension to the AES command system
- +300 MHz processor clock speed advantage
- +4 MB advantage L2 cache
- +8 GB RAM advantage
- +1333 MHz RAM clock advantage
- By 2 channels more for RAM
- Supports virtualization technology
- Has a dynamic processor frequency
Information about the series and architecture of AMD A8-5550M and Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600, as well as the release date of these processors.
A-Series
Core 2 Quad (Desktop)
Richland
Kentsfield
AMD A8-5550M
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600
2013-06-01
2007-01-08
The main technical characteristics of AMD A8-5550M and Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 processors.
4
4
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)
4
4
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)
2100 MHz
2400 MHz
Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz
3100 MHz
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)
4 MB
8 MB
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)
35 W
105 W
Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)
32 nm
65 nm
Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)
Information about the type and the maximum possible RAM capacity support, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.
No data
8 GB
Leader — AMD Epyc 7282 (4000)
No data
1333 MHz
Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)
No data
2
Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)
DDR3
DDR3
Characteristics of an integrated graphics processing unit. Support of 4K, clock speed, as well as video core memory capacity.
Radeon HD 8550G
No data
Support by processors of such advanced technologies as multithreading, Turbo mode, AES cryptographic algorithm, and x86 AVX command system extension.
AMD A8-5550M
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600
AMD A8-5550M
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600
AMD A8-5550M
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600
AMD A8-5550M
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600
AMD A8-5550M
Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600
Cinebench benchmark is a widely known and free computer performance test (testing a CPU and a video card). The program has been developed based upon MAXON Cinema 4D – a professional application for creating 3D animation.
188
No data
Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)
68
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)
2.05
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)
0.78
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)
5844
8800
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)
2321
2460
Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)
Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a number of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer has to deal with in everyday work.
4417
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (80967)
1691
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (4875)
4432
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (43557)
A number of different tests including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many others.
2795
3546.5
Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)
31.42
21. 2
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)
1851.47
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)
26.02
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)
890.7
538
Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)
1932.5
No data
Leader — Intel Core i7-6950X (8450)
70.59
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (279)
13. 49
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (167)
1.3
No data
Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (20)
0.26
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (3)
0.14
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)
3223
No data
Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (111)
2646
No data
Leader — Intel Core i5-1035G1 (9643)
6631
No data
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (93099)
70. 59
No data
Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (50)
11019.5
No data
Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (48268)
65
No data
Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (256)
Comparison of Intel Core i5-4260U and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-4260U and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Image quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
Intel Core i5-4260U
versus
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-4260U
- Newer processor, release date difference approx 7 year(s) 9019 30 month(s) % more clock speed: 2.
70 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 7 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 105 Watt
- About 77% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 584 vs 330
- About 21% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 1233 1.681 vs 0.522
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 20% better performance vs 1019
- more: 29.161 vs 24.255
- About 54% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.213 vs 0.138
- About 11% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) more: 0.83 vs 0.748
| Release date | 14 April 2014 vs January 2007 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.70 GHz vs 2. |
| Process | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 584 vs 330 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1233 vs 1019 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.681 vs 0.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.161 vs 24.255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 vs 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1. |
0.83 vs 0.748 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
- 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
- L1 cache is 2x larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 16x larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop benchmark — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 99% more: 3.829 vs 1.921
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Level 1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| Level 2 cache | 8192 KB vs 512 KB |
| CompuBench 1. |
3.829 vs 1.921 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4260U
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1. |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1. |
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4260U | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1484 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2349 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 584 | 330 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1233 | 1019 |
| CompuBench 1. |
1.681 | 0.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.161 | 24.255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 | 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.83 | 0.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.921 | 3.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1091 | |
| GFXBench 4. |
2076 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3744 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1091 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2076 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3744 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i5-4260U | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Haswell | Kentsfield |
| Production date | April 14, 2014 | January 2007 |
| Price at first issue date | $325 | |
| Place in the ranking | 1727 | 2970 |
| Processor Number | i5-4260U | Q6600 |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Applicability | Mobile | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1. |
2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 181mm | 286 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 128KB | 256KB |
| Level 2 cache | 512KB | 8192KB |
| Level 3 cache | 3MB | |
| Process | 22nm | 65nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | B3=62. |
| Maximum frequency | 2.70 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Number of transistors | 1300 Million | 582 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.8500V-1.500V | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. |
|
| Maximum memory size | 16GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Device ID | 0xA26 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Maximum GPU clock | 1GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Video memory size | 2GB | |
| Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5000 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | |
| WiDi support | ||
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. |
[email protected] | |
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCBGA1168 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 12 | |
| Maximum number of SATA 6 Gb/s ports | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2. |
|
| PCI | ||
| PCIe configurations | 4×1, 2×4 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 4 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Active Management Technology (AMT) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Parity FSB | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Intel Core i5-4200U vs Intel Core i5-4278U: What is the difference?
smartphonesgraphic cardswireless headphones CPU
34 points
Intel Core i5-4200U
38 points
Intel Core i5-4278U
Comparison winner
vs
66 facts in comparison
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core i5-4278U 9000 Intel i5-427 better than Intel8 Core i5-427?
- 13W below TDP?
15W vs 28W - 64KB more L1 cache?
128KB vs 64KB
- 1.
63x higher CPU speed?
2 x 2.6GHz vs 2 x 1.6GHz - 0.5GHz faster turbo clock speed?
3.1GHz vs 2.6GHz - 27.32% higher PassMark score?
2801 vs 2200 - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - 27.55% higher PassMark score (single)?
1699 vs 1332 - 37.8% higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?
1542 vs 1119 - 31.82% higher single core Geekbench 5 result?
696 vs 528 - 0.3 newer version of OpenGL?
4.3 vs 4
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
vs
Intel Core i5-12500H
AMD Ryzen 3 3250u
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800h
VS
Intel Core i7-12700h
Intel Core i5-1135g7
VS 9000 VS 9000. S. AMD RYZEN 5 5600X
VS
AMD RYZEN 7 5700X
Apple M2
VS
Intel Core i9-12900K
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g 9000 VS
9000 AMD Ryzen 7 5700x 9000 AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD RYZEN 7 5700X AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD Ryzen 7 5700x AMD RYZEN0002 VS
Intel Core i7-11800h
AMD Ryzen 3 5300u
VS
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Complexation of prices
Users
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 x 2.6GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
2. 6GHz
3.1GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i5-4200U
✖Intel Core i5-4278U
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
2832.85seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
result Blender (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
5387.12seconds
The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
200MHz
200MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
1000MHz
1100MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Execution Units
A Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
version of DirectX
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖Intel Core i5-4200U
✖Intel Core i5-4278U
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4278U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
, Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-4200U
✔Intel Core i5-4278U
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-4200U
✔Intel Core i5-4278U
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-4200U
✔Intel Core i5-4278U
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4200U)
Unknown.