AMD Ryzen 7 4700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U: What is the difference?
55points
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
53points
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 4700U better than AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U?
- 17.65% faster CPU speed?
8 x 2GHzvs8 x 1.7GHz - 1066MHz higher ram speed?
4266MHzvs3200MHz - 10W lower TDP?
15Wvs25W - 106.6 more performance per watt?
317.7vs211.1 - 3 higher clock multiplier?
20vs17
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U better than AMD Ryzen 7 4700U?
- 8 more CPU threads?
16vs8 - 13.29% higher PassMark result?
15537vs13714 - 2 more memory channels?
4vs2 - 14.5% higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?
5379vs4698 - 24.
05% higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
3007vs2424 - 5.57% higher single-core Geekbench 5 result?
1023vs969
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
Intel Core i7-10510U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
Intel Core i7-1165G7
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
Intel Core i7-1165G7
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
Intel Core i7-10700
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
Intel Core i7-10610U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
Intel Core i7-1065G7
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
Apple M1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
vs
Intel Core i7-1260P
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
3 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
8.
3/10
3 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
0 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.3/10
3 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
7.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
9.0/10
3 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
9.0/10
3 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
9.7/10
3 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 2GHz
8 x 1.7GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.1GHz
4.1GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✖AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.
5MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
4266MHz
3200MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
68.3GB/s
68.27GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✖AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✖AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Intel Core i7-6700TE
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Intel Core i7-6700TE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i7-6700TE
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 8 more threads: 16 vs 8
- Around 21% higher clock speed: 4.
1 GHz vs 3.40 GHz - A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2542 vs 2025
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 15390 vs 6789
| Launch date | 7 May 2020 vs 19 October 2015 |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 8 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| L1 cache | 512 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2542 vs 2025 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 15390 vs 6789 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-6700TE
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Intel Core i7-6700TE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2542 | 2025 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 15390 | 6789 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 3912 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 11914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Intel Core i7-6700TE | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 | Skylake |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO | |
| Launch date | 7 May 2020 | 19 October 2015 |
| OPN Tray | 100-000000101 | |
| Place in performance rating | 375 | 291 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4000 | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Embedded |
| Processor Number | i7-6700TE | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Base frequency | 1. 7 GHz |
2.40 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 7 | |
| Number of threads | 16 | 8 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68. 27 GB/s |
34.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| Execution Units | 7 | |
| Number of pipelines | 448 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
| Device ID | 0x1912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 00 GHz |
|
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 3 |
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| Configurable TDP | 10-25 Watt | |
| Sockets supported | FP6 | FCLGA1151 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
|
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015A (35W) | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1×8+1×4+1×4, 2×4+1×4+1×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U with others
AMD
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
vs
Intel
Core i7-5850EQ
AMD
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
vs
Intel
Core i3-8145UE
AMD
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
vs
AMD
Ryzen 5 4600H
AMD
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
vs
AMD
Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
vs
Intel
Core i5-1145G7E
AMD
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
vs
AMD
Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U operates with 8 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.10 GHz base 3.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the FP6 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Renoir (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2020
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U operates with 4 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the FP5 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Picasso (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM.
The product was launched on Q1/2019
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Compare Detail
| 1.70 GHz | Frequency | 2.30 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 4 |
| 4.10 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.00 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.50 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir) |
GPU |
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 7 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2400 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
8. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
| FP6 | Socket | FP5 |
| 15 W | TDP | 15 W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q2/2020 | Release date | Q1/2019 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.
5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.
The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | |
| 15 W | Max TDP | 15 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Core i7 1165G7 Tiger Lake vs.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U Linux Performance
Written by Michael Larabel in AMD on 24 October 2020 at 01:03 PM EDT. 17 Comments
For the Intel Tiger Lake Linux benchmarking thus far with the Core i7 1165G7 on the Dell XPS 13 9310 it’s primarily been compared against the Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 4700U on the AMD side since those are the only Renoir units within my possession. But a Phoronix reader recently provided me with remote access to his Lenovo ThinkPad X13 with Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (8 cores / 16 threads) for seeing how the Tiger Lake performance compares against that higher-end SKU.
Phoronix reader Tomas kindly provided SSH access to his ThinkPad X13 with Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and 16GB of RAM. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is quite close to the Ryzen 7 4800U with 8 cores / 16 threads but graphics capabilities in line with the 4700U. He’s been quite happy with the ThinkPad X13 as a replacement to the Dell XPS 13 for business usage and has been running it with Ubuntu 18.
04 LTS on the Linux 5.8 kernel.
For getting an idea how the Core i7 1165G7 compares to the 4750U, I ran tests with the Phoronix Test Suite on the ThinkPad X13 compared to the recent i7-1165G7 results both on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and then again with 20.10 given that Ubuntu 20.10 really helps out with Tiger Lake. Those results and the other laptops tested remain unchanged from the earlier article, just now with the Ryen 7 PRO 4750U results for reference purposes.
Given that it was just remote access and limited time, it’s not a full review like usual under properly controlled conditions. But hopefully these numbers will be helpful since I don’t have any Ryzen 4800/4900 series laptops. Most laptops tested at Phoronix have to be purchased retail due to most laptop vendors generally not interested / concerned enough about Linux and its small marketshare.
Interestingly the context switching performance on the Ryzen 7 PRO was faster than the other Renoir non-PRO laptops.
The Ryzen 7 4700U does have a higher base clock frequency than the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (2.0GHz vs. 1.7GHz) while both having a 4.1GHz peak boost clock. So in cases where the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U can’t shine with its eight cores / sixteen threads, in some cases the 4700U does still lead the race.
But for properly threaded workloads, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U obviously excels well past the Ryzen 7 4700U and in turn well beyond the performance afforded by the Core i7 1165G7 in just being a quad-core part with Hyper Threading.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U within the Lenovo ThinkPad X13 looks like it can serve quite well as a very capable and powerful mobile system. Thanks to Tomas for providing remote access for being able to provide these Renoir 8c/16t tests while hopefully we will find our hands on some other Ryzen 4800/4900 series mobile hardware in the future; readers can show their support by viewing this site without any ad-blockers, letting laptop vendors know your interest in seeing Linux benchmarks on sites such as Phoronix, or by joining Phoronix Premium or tips to help offset the hardware costs.
With continuing to run more benchmarks each day on the Core i7-1165G7 Tiger Lake, you can also begin to find i7-1165G7 benchmarks on OpenBenchmarking.org including the ability to easily compare the i7-1165G7 against other CPUs on Linux. From there thanks to an independent user are also a few common points for comparing against the 4800U, among other CPUs.
Related News
With AMD Zen 4, It’s Surprisingly Not Worthwhile Disabling CPU Security Mitigations
AMD PMF Cool & Quiet Framework Readied For Linux 6.1
Linux 6.0 Merges The AMD Performance Fix For The Old «Dummy Wait» Workaround
A 20 Year Old Chipset Workaround Has Been Hurting Modern AMD Linux Systems
AMD Hardware Ray-Tracing Hopes To Be Ready For Blender 3.5
AMD RDNA 3 Being Announced On 3 November
About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics.
Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.
Popular News This Week
A 20 Year Old Chipset Workaround Has Been Hurting Modern AMD Linux Systems
Rust-Written Apple DRM Linux Kernel Driver Renders First Cube
Fedora Linux Disabling Mesa’s H.264 / H.265 / VC1 VA-API Support Over Legal Concerns
Linux 6.0 Merges The AMD Performance Fix For The Old «Dummy Wait» Workaround
Wayland’s Weston 11.0 Released With HDR Display & Multi-GPU Preparations
Btrfs Async Buffered Writes Slated For Linux 6.1 — 2x Throughput Improvement
AMD RDNA3 GPUs Can Have A Lot More Vector Registers Than RDNA2
OpenJDK Java’s Native Wayland Support Progressing
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U vs Ryzen 7 4700U: performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
We compared two 8-core laptop CPUs: the 1.
8 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 5700U against the 2.0 GHz Ryzen 7 4700U. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments (2)
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Ryzen 7 5700U
64
Ryzen 7 4700U
62
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Ryzen 7 5700U
43
Ryzen 7 4700U
35
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Ryzen 7 5700U
82
Ryzen 7 4700U
77
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Ryzen 7 5700U
59
Ryzen 7 4700U
55
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 4700U and 5700U
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
- Newer — released 1-year later
- 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 5700U
+4%
1265
Ryzen 7 4700U
1220
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 5700U
+23%
9088
Ryzen 7 4700U
7398
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 5700U
+2%
2626
Ryzen 7 4700U
2578
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 5700U
+18%
16210
Ryzen 7 4700U
13718
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 5700U
+4%
1180
Ryzen 7 4700U
1140
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 5700U
+26%
6236
Ryzen 7 4700U
4942
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 7 5700U and Ryzen 7 4700U
General
| Vendor | AMD | AMD |
| Released | January 12, 2021 | January 6, 2020 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Lucienne | Zen 2 |
| Socket | FP6 | FP6 |
| Integrated GPU | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Radeon Vega 7 |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1. 8 GHz |
2.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 18x | 20x |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 32K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 8MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Fabrication process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 10-25 W | 10-25 W |
| Max. temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Radeon Vega 7 |
| GPU Base Clock | — | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1900 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Shading Units | 512 | 448 |
| TMUs | 32 | 28 |
| ROPs | 8 | 7 |
| TGP | 15 W | 10-45 W |
iGPU FLOPS
Ryzen 7 5700U
n/a
Ryzen 7 4700U
1.
108 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 |
| Memory Size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | — | 68.27 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | AMD Ryzen 7 5700U official page | AMD Ryzen 7 4700U official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 16 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Ryzen 7 5700U
583 (78.
9%)
Ryzen 7 4700U
156 (21.1%)
Total votes: 739
ompetitors
1.
Ryzen 7 5700U and Core i7 1165G7
2.
Ryzen 7 5700U and Ryzen 5 5500U
3.
Ryzen 7 5700U and Core i5 11300H
4.
Ryzen 7 5700U and Core i5 1235U
5.
Ryzen 7 5700U and Core i5 1240P
6.
Ryzen 7 4700U and Core i7 1165G7
7.
Ryzen 7 4700U and Ryzen 5 5500U
8.
Ryzen 7 4700U and Apple M1
9.
Ryzen 7 4700U and Ryzen 7 6800U
Ryzen 7 4700U review: AMD’s budget 8-core crushes Intel’s 10th-gen chips, again
The AMD Ryzen 7 4700U arrives at a key moment for laptop CPUs. After AMD launched its 7nm Ryzen 4000 CPU family at CES and dealt a first, crushing blow with the Ryzen 9 4900HS chip in high-end notebook PCs, the company has its eyes on the real prize: U-class laptops.
Yes, those sub-three-pound slivers (known in a past life as Ultrabooks) everyone casually carries into meetings or lays on the table in a cafe.
The vast majority of laptops today fit into this category. Traditionally they’re known to sacrifice performance for lighter weight and thinner design. AMD’s offerings in this area have been weak in the past, so the company focused on optimizing Ryzen 4000 for thinner notebook PCs. Everyone wants to know if AMD’s Ryzen “U” chips finally have what it takes.
Our test subject, the first Ryzen 7 4700U laptop we’ve tested, is Acer’s Swift 3. Yes, don’t rub your eyes, we’re about to put a budget $650 laptop against laptops that cost many times more. To find out which one wins, read on.
Acer
The bulk of our testing was done on a “budget” Acer Swift 3 with a 14-inch screen, 512GB SSD, 8GB of LPDDR4X/3733 and Ryzen 7 4700U.
How we tested
When we test a new CPU, we run a lot of extra benchmarks. This review shows a selection of those tests.
Click this link to find our full benchmark results for Ryzen 7 4700U.
As you can’t test a laptop CPU by itself, we selected three models to represent their respective CPUs. Acer’s Swift 3 SF314-42 debuts with AMD’s Ryzen 7 4700U, code-named “Renoir.” This budget CPU features 8 cores, but without Symmetrical Multi-Threading (that’s reserved for the Ryzen 7 4800U), so it’s limited to 8 total threads. The Swift 3 comes with 8GB of LPDDR4X/3733 RAM and a 14-inch display.
Representing Intel are Dell’s XPS 13 7390 with Intel’s Comet Lake U 10th-gen Core i7 10710U, and Dell’s XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 with Intel’s Ice Lake 10th-gen Core i7-1065G7. The top-end Comet Lake U features 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ice Lake chip features 4 cores with 8 threads. We consider both XPS laptops to be good comparisons, as they usually top the charts in performance over most of the laptops we see. They both have 16GB of RAM compared to the Acer’s 8GB, but the Dell XPS 13 7390 uses slower LPDDR3, while the XPS 13 2-in-1 uses LPDDR4X/3733.
The XPS 13’s display is 13.3 inches, and the XPS 13 2-in-1’s screen is 13.4 inches.
All three laptops were running the latest public build of Windows 10 (1909 18363.815) and the latest drivers and UEFI, to bring them in line with all of the security mitigations. While the Acer didn’t appear to have any performance settings other than Window 10’s slider (remember, it’s a $650 budget laptop), both Dell XPS laptops were run using their Ultra Performance settings.
We also want to mention that testing three laptops at home during shelter-in-place required some accommodation. With ambient temperatures always shifting in our test lab-slash-dining room, we stopped testing when the temps got too high. For consistency, all of the results we show are from the laptops running the same tests at the same time.
The last fact we should mention is the price. While both XPS 13’s are essentially the cream of the crop and priced accordingly, the Swift 3 here is a commoner at $650.
Gordon Mah Ung
You get a Ryzen 7 4700U! And you get a Ryzen 7 4700U! OK, not really, but wouldn’t it be cool if AMD had an Oprah moment?
Ryzen 7 4700U CPU Performance
We’ll kick this off with Maxon’s Cinebench R20.
It’s a recently updated test made to measure how fast a CPU renders a 3D model. It uses the company’s Cinema4D engine, which is integrated into major products including Adobe Premiere Pro CC.
Intel has argued that using 3D modelling benchmarks isn’t useful in thin-and-light laptops, because very few people buy them for that kind of work. While we somewhat agree, we also see there’s enough performance potential now in thin-and-lights that you could shed a few pounds (in power brick, too), yet still enjoy multi-core performance.
As the chart below shows, you could enjoy plenty from Ryzen 7 4700U, which was 23 percent faster than Intel’s most advanced 10th-gen Core i7-1065G7 chip. It’s also about 14 percent faster than Intel’s top-end 6-core, 12-thread Core i7-10710U. Remember: This Ryzen 7 4700U doesn’t even have SMT turned on.
IDG
AMD’s budget Ryzen 7 4700U in the Acer Swift 3 easily puts both premium Intel 10th-gen U-chips to sleep.
To focus on Intel’s contention that single-threaded performance matters most, we use Cinebench R20 set to a single thread.
It’s not the same as running a spell-check in Microsoft Word, but it does give you an indication of the chip’s performance under load.
IDG
Cinebench R20 puts the Ryzen 7 slightly ahead of both Intel chips, but it’s essentially a tie.
The results above are basically a tie. The “winner” here is Ryzen 7 4700U, which comes in slightly ahead of the Core i7-10710U Comet Lake U. You’d expect the Comet Lake U’s 4.7GHz turbo boost clock to win this over the Ryzen 7 4700U’s 4GHz boost clock, but Cinebench R20 takes far longer to run than the older Cinebench R15 and uses AVX, AVX2, and AVX512, which can drag down the boost clocks. (See our Cinebench R15 results at the end of the review.)
Our next CPU test measures performance under more stressful conditions. We normally use an older, 0.9.9 version of the free HandBrake utility to convert a 30GB, 1080p video using the Android Tablet preset. Both 1080p and Android tablets are about as far behind us as 2014, though, so we took this chance run the latest public version of HandBrake, version 1.
3.1, and convert the open-source 4K video, Tears of Steel, using the H.265 Matroska 1080p/30 preset.
For this test, the encode is done purely on the x86 cores. Obviously, the shorter result is better, because that means less time waiting for the encode.
As you can see below, Ryzen 7 4700U wins by a mile, coming in about 30 percent faster than the Core i7-10710U. Against the more advanced 10nm Core i7-1065G7, you’re looking at a 36-percent difference. Remember, the Ryzen 7 4700U doesn’t even have SMT.
IDG
The Ryzen 7 4700U crushes the Core i7-10710U and Core i7-1065G7 in an HEVC-encode test.
The previous encode uses the x86 side to perform the video transcode. That’s kind of old-school when you have the advanced media engines in the chips. To look at that, we used the same 4K Tears of Steel video and encoded it using the H.265 preset; however, we switched it to use the QuickSync encoding engine for Intel, and AMD’s new VCE (Video Coding Engine).
We set all three to use the Main Profile setting and Peak Frame Rate at 30 fps (the QuickSync preset defaults to the older Variable Frame Rate setting, set to Same as Source).
IDG
VCE pulls out a decent win against QuickSync in our H.265 encode test.
As you can see in the chart above, AMD’s VCE crosses the finish line first, about 11 percent faster than the Core i7-1065G7. The Core i7-10710U and its older media engine are about 28 percent slower.
AMD’s VCE engine wins on performance, but one variable we don’t consider is the quality of the video encoded by QuickSync and VCE. Even though both are using the same settings in HandBrake, it’s not quite equal if one is producing inferior video. Perhaps we’ll ask our video nerds to check the video quality. For now, we’ll still give it to AMD’s VCE. And if this isn’t enough CPU data for you, check out our companion story with the full roster of benchmarks on Ryzen 7 4700U.
Ryzen 7 4700U GPU Performance
For the next section we’ll move on to graphics performance.
The 14nm, 10th-gen Core i7-10710U offers essentially the same graphics engine we’ve seen for many years now, Intel UHD, with a number to denote its performance. Intel has more recently dropped the number, and we sometimes don’t even see the U anymore either. The 10nm, 10th-gen Core i7-1065G7 gets a much more advanced Iris Plus graphics engine, which was a welcome change when introduced. It’s enough to make low-power discrete Nvidia MX graphics nervous.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 4700U features improved Radeon Vega cores, which the company said are markedly faster and more efficient than Vega cores on older process generations. The Ryzen 7 4700U features 7 compute units inside, which can offer 1080p gaming capability. But let’s be realistic: It’s a limited thermal envelope with only LPDDR4X/3733 vs. a discrete GPU’s GDDR6. It’s only going to take you so far. We’ve said the same about Intel’s much better Iris Plus graphics, too.
Still, synthetic tests help illustrate the limitations. 3DMark’s Sky Diver (below) is well suited for basic gaming measurements.
As you can see, the Ryzen 7 4700U with Radeon graphics is about 12 percent faster in the graphics-only sub-test, which mostly filters out CPU performance. You can find our results for 3DMark Fire Strike and more in our companion article of all the benchmarks we ran on Ryzen 7 4700U.
IDG
Ryzen 7 4700U Battery life
Perhaps one metric that overshadows all is battery life. Our video rundown test uses the same Tears of Steel 4K video and loops it using Windows 10’s Movies & TV player (the most efficient one in town). We put the laptop into airplane mode, connect earbuds to minimize the speaker driver impact, and set screen brightness to 250 to 260 nits.
Note that this chart includes some older test results. We used the official scores from the reviews of both the Dell laptops, as OS and UEFI updates should not affect this test. We also brought in the results from recent Intel-based Swift 3 laptops we’ve tested, with 8th-gen Whiskey Lake and 10th-gen Ice Lake chips.
IDG
Most of the Acer Swift 3 laptops we’ve tested, incuding this new one with Ryzen 7 4700U, have middling battery life.
Here’s the one place where Ryzen 7 4700U stumbles. It posts an unremarkable 8 hours and 10 minutes of runtime, compared to nearly 10 hours for the XPS 13, and nearly 12 hours for the XPS 13 2-in-1. Also note that the XPS 13 we tested features a 4K screen, which consumes far more power than 1080p panels such as the one in the Acer Swift 3. The same XPS 13 with an FHD screen might have lasted an additional three to four hours.
To be fair, the Ryzen-based Swift 3 is mostly in line with two of the three other Core-based Swift 3’s we’ve tested. At this point, we think it’s safe to say that battery life on the Acer Swift 3 is middling across the board, and it may have nothing to do with the Ryzen chip. We’ll wait until we’ve tested seven or eight Ryzen 4000-based laptops to establish a trend for this CPU family. (We should note that the Ryzen 9 4900HS in the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 gave us fantastic video rundown performance).
Ryzen 7 4700U: The chip that won’t quit
To wrap it up, we’ll help you visualize the strength of the Ryzen 7 4700U: CPU performance. For that we use the older and lighter Cinebench R15 and run it from 1 thread to the maximum amount. For the Comet Lake U Core i7-10710U, that’s 12. The runs are performed sequentially, with a few minutes’ rest in between.
In the chart below, we see a regression in performance with the Core i7-10710U that is hard to understand. We think it might be our issues with the ambient room temperature. On a cooler morning we’ll rerun this, but remember: We ran the Ryzen 7 under the same conditions.
IDG
We run Cinebench R15 across all of the CPU cores to give you an idea of how the chips perform.
We also graph out the performance difference, below. As you can see, the Ryzen 7 4700U is underwater on those light loads, where the higher boost clocks of the Core i7-10710U have an advantage in Cinebench R15. The Ryzen 7 4700U opens up a big lead down the home stretch.
Even though the Core i7-10710U has 12 threads in a test that favors more threads, the 8-core-only Ryzen 7 4700U fights it to a standstill. Overall, we’d say it’s a win for AMD, especially when you consider the Ryzen 7’s better GPU.
IDG
Intel’s most advanced 14nm U-chip, the Core i7-10710U, leads the Ryzen in single-threaded performance. It’s mostly a tie on heavy loads, with the 8-core-only Ryzen 7 offering more interesting performance spikes.
The more interesting battle is between AMD’s 7nm Ryzen 7 4700U and Intel’s 10nm Core i7-1065G7. We’ve already seen how close the two can be at times, even in graphics performance. The main issue for the Intel chip is it doesn’t go beyond 4 cores. When you compare the Ryzen 7 4700U against the Core i7-1065G7, it looks like this.
IDG
Multi-core performance on AMD’s new Ryzen 7 4700U (green) vs. Intel’s most advanced 10th-gen Core i7-1065G7 (blue).
That probably doesn’t look like much, so here is the performance difference by percent. Both chips are actually dead even on single-core performance, but as you ramp up, the Ryzen 7 4700U doesn’t look back. It’s basically double digits, with a whopping 22-percent difference at 8 threads. The basic lesson is while Hyper-Threading helps quite a bit, it’s not enough to beat 8 physical cores. This is likely to look even uglier with the Ryzen 7 4800U, which has SMT (AMD’s Hyper-Threading) switched on.
IDG
The 4-core, 8-thread Core i7-1065G7 can’t hang with the Ryzen as threads go up.
Ryzen 4000 continues to change the game
Ryzen 4000’s journey is by far not perfect. During our Ryzen 7 4700U testing, we tried to create a workload using Windows 10’s overlooked but awesome Video Editor (yes, that’s its name). We took the 4K Tears of Steel video, added ugly titles, 3D effects, and “denim” filter effect, exporting it to 1080p.
On the Dell XPS 13 2-in-1, the project and export ran as smooth as butter—very impressive for an ultralight laptop. We tried the same with the Swift 3 and Ryzen 7, but the project just hung when hardware acceleration (AMD’s VCE) was enabled. We’re sure this issue will be corrected once Microsoft notices, but we bring this up as a reminder that AMD is moving in to a world that’s been largely focused on Intel CPUs for a long, long time.
Before we end this, we want to help put some perspective on AMD’s Ryzen 7 4700U and Acer’s Swift 3. Remember that this is a budget $650 laptop with 8GB of RAM and 512GB SSD. It’s basically cooled by a single heat pipe and fan, vs. the intricate copper vapor chambers of the XPS 13 2-in-1 or dual fans of the XPS 13. Even so, the Swift 3 was always well-behaved and never the first to offend with fan noise. That’s nearly the same experience we saw on Asus’ ROG Zephyrus G14 on CPU operations. We can’t say the same for most Intel-based laptops when pushed hard.
Yet this modest Swift 3 budgetbook offers performance that actually puts it into the ballpark of Intel’s 9th-gen H-class laptops. You can see that illustrated below, where we drop the Acer Swift 3 into a pack of H-class gaming laptops. The longer red line belongs to the Ryzen 9-powered Asus ROG Zephyrus G14.
IDG
The Acer Swift 3 can actually perform as well as Intel’s 9th-gen H-class CPUs in CPU operations.
We’ll show it yet again in the more intensive HandBrake test, this time using the older version, where we transcode a 30GB 1080p MKV file using the Android Tablet preset. The workload favors more cores and threads. The Acer Swift 3 with its Ryzen 7 4700U is in line with 6-core, 12-thread Core i7-8750H and Core i7-9750H chips in laptops that weigh five pounds or more, typically. Yes, those H-class gaming laptops would whup the Swift 3 silly in gaming—but in CPU performance, it’s way too close for comfort for Intel fans.
IDG
Amazing: A Ryzen 7 4700U without SMT, can just about hang with 8th gen Core i7-8750H and Core i7-9750H chips.
The Ryzen 7 4700U delivers simply stunning performance that raises the bar for what we’ve come to expect of U-class laptops. Only its battery life falls back to earth (and that may change as we see more laptop implementations.) Overall, it’s yet more proof of just how much of a game-changer the Ryzen 4000 CPUs are.
Correction: A previous version of this story included a photo caption that incorrectly stated the amount of RAM. PCWorld regrets the error.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U: What is the difference?
55 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
53 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 7 4700u
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000U 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000U AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U?
- 17.65% faster CPU speed?
8 x 2GHz vs 8 x 1.7GHz - 1066MHz higher RAM speed?
4266MHz vs 3200MHz - 10W below TDP?
15W vs 25W - 106.
6 higher performance per watt?
317.7 vs 211.1 - 3 higher hour multiplier?
20 vs 17
- 8 more CPU threads?
16 vs 8 - 13.29% higher PassMark score?
15537 vs 13714 - 2 more memory channels?
4 vs 2 - 14.5% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
5379 vs 4698 - 24.05% higher Cinebench R20 score (multi-core)?
3007 vs 2424 - 5.57% higher single core Geekbench 5 result?
1023 vs 969
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD RYZEN 7 4700U
VS
Intel Core i5-1135g7
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
VS
Intel Core i7-10510U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
VS 9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
VS
Intel Core i5-1135g7
AMD Ryzen 7 4700u
Intel Core i7-1165G7
PRO
9000 (0004 AMD RYZEN 7 4700U
VS
Intel Core i7-10700
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
VS
Intel Core i7-10610U
AMD
AMD RYZEN Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600h
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 9000u 9000u 9000) 7 4700U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
VS
000 AMDEN CORE I7-1065G
VS
Apple M1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700u
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3750h
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
VS
-1260P
AMD Ryzen 70004 AMD RYZEN 5 4500U
Comparison prices
Users reviews
General rating
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
3 users
AMD Ryzen 7,000u
9000 9000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3 illegars 7 Pro 4750U
0 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
0. 0 /10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.3 /10
3 Votes
Reviews not yet
7.5 /10
2 VOTES
Reviews yet not
9000
3 Votes
reviews not yet
Reliability
/10
3 Votes
003
9 can execute a processor, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.1GHz
4.1GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✖AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
4266MHz
3200MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2. max memory bandwidth
68.3GB/s
68.27GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✖AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Result Cinebench R20 (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as flows. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✔AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. TrustZone enabled
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
✖AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Cpu Benchmark with
tests
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | AMD Ryzen 7 4700U | |
| 1.70GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 4.10GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 4.10 GHz |
| 3.10GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 3.40 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| yes | Hyperthreading ? | No |
| No | Overclocking? | No |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
| AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir) | GPU | AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir) |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-3200 | memory size | DDR4-3200 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max. |
||
| yes | ECC | yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 7nm |
| FP6 | Socket | FP6 |
| 15W | TDP | 15W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q2/2020 | Issue date | Q1/2020 |
| show more details | show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have passed CPU-Benchmark testing. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Benchmark formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4700U — Specs and Test Cpu Benchmark
4.4 of 46 rating(s)
Compare AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dual AMD | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U noticeably loses in terms of base clock speed, 1700 MHz vs. 3800 MHz | 0562 | |
| The Ryzen 7 5800X has stock overclocking tools. (Unlocked multiplier) | N/a | ||
| Ryzen 7 5800X will need more powerful cooling since its thermal output is 105W than the competitor and equal to 15 watts | |||
| 5 degrees Celsius. Not far behind rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U core temperature threshold is not much higher and reaches 105 degrees Celsius | ||
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X supports PCI Express version 4.0 AMD | 2 PRO 4750U supports PCI Express version 3.0 | ||
| Ryzen 7 5800X L3 cache is much larger than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U at 32768 KB | The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U L3 cache size is much less compared to the Ryzen 7 5800X and is 8192 KB | ||
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure Power | — | Technology to dynamically reduce the frequency and power consumption of the processor. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. |
||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3. | ||
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD Extensions for Streaming 3. | ||
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | ||
| AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | Command system extension. | ||
| AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | Command system extension. | ||
| BMI1, BMI2 (Bit manipulation instructions sets) | — | X86 bit control command set. |
|
| F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | 16-bit floating point conversion. | ||
| FMA3 (Fused Multiply-Add 3) | Multiply Add with Round One (FMA3). | ||
| SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension. | ||
| AVX 2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2) | Command extension 2. | ||
| BMI1 (Bit manipulation instructions 1) | — | BMI1 bit control command set. | |
| AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm extensions) | Secure hash algorithm extensions. |
||
| SMAP (Supervisor Mode Access Prevention) | Supervisor mode access prevention. | ||
| SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Prevention) | Prevent execution in supervisor mode. | ||
| EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | Improved virus protection. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD-V | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMT (Simultaneous MultiThreading) | Simultaneous multithreading. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The main rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all the data: test results for all programs, technologies, instructions, socket, number of cores, threads, structure, frequency, year of release, temperature , and much more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Ryzen 7 5800X surpasses its rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U in most parameters. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U model barely scores 18823.9 compared to the competitor3 points.
PassMark CPU Mark
It includes a wide range of benchmarks for extensive assessment of the performance of personal computers, particularly CPUs. Among which are compression, encryption, integer calculations, game physics calculations, floating point calculations, extended instruction checking, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. In particular, you can compare the results with other configurations in the database. All processors presented on our website have been tested by PassMark. Perhaps the most popular benchmark on the Internet. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Ryzen 7 5800X processor (28547 points) over the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (15550 points). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, with a score of 15550, clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
It is possible to test multiple processor systems. MAXON appeared, it is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. Single — in its work uses only one core and one thread for rendering. Works in operating systems Windows, Mac OS X. The basic speed testing mode is spatial light sources, working with light, global illumination simulation, multilevel reflections, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders. The ray tracing method is used. This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is now very outdated. Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Cinebench 10 single thread test with 8379points. The Ryzen 7 5800X falls short in this test with a score of 6835.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread is another test method in Cinebench R10 that uses multi-thread and multi-core test method. It is important to note that the number of threads in this version of the program is limited to 16. In Cinebench R10 multi-threaded testing, the Ryzen 7 5800X processor scored 45548 points, thus far ahead of the competitor. In turn, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U received a much lower score: 29574 points.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark — which can load the CPU to 100 using all cores and threads. It differs from previous versions of the program, 64 threads will be used here. Testing the Ryzen 7 5800X in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 29.3 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. Whereas the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U scores 15.8 points, far behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Excellent fully functional Cinebench 11.5 from Maxon. In this case, Single-Core tests occur using one thread and one core. The tests still use the ray tracing process, rendering a highly detailed 3D room with a lot of glass and crystal and translucent spheres. His tests are still relevant. The result of the test is the «frames per second» parameter. Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core Ryzen 7 5800X single-threaded performance scores 3.09 compared to the competitorpoints. But the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U itself, scoring 2.12 points in this test, is far behind it.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
Multi Core version of Cinebench R15 will test your build completely, showing everything it can do. It is ideal for testing new multi-threaded processors from Intel and AMD, as it can use 256 computation threads. Diagnostics will involve all CPU threads and cores when rendering complex 3D models. The Ryzen 7 5800X, with a score of 2616, unequivocally scores higher in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U lags far behind with a score of 1410 in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench 15 is the latest tester from Finns from Maxon. It tests the entire system: both video cards and processors. For processors, the result of the analysis will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the value of frames per second FPS. In the Single Core version, one thread is involved in rendering. A complex 3D scene is being rendered with a large number of light sources, highly detailed objects and reflections. The single threaded test of the Ryzen 7 5800X processor in Cinebench R15 shows its high performance, with a score of 266 points. Compared to it, its rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U fails this test with a score of 181 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark
64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It’s cross-device and OS support makes Geekbench benchmarks the most valuable right now. It’s Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core processor Ryzen 7 5800X received 44125 points, which is significantly higher than the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. In this test, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U gets an extremely low score of 32904.14 compared to the Ryzen 7 5800X.
Geekbench 4.
0 (64-bit) Single thread test
The program, like its earlier versions, can still be run on operating systems: Mac OS, Linux, Windows. The Single-Core test uses 1 thread. The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktop PCs. For the first time in this version of the tester, mobile devices on iOS and Android are also supported. The Ryzen 7 5800X scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 7294. But its competitor Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is doing much worse — 5619.09 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-Threaded Benchmark
The Multi-Thread version of the Geekbench 3 benchmark can allow you to stress test your CPU and demonstrate how stable your OS is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
The 32-bit version of the benchmark loads one thread and one CPU core. Multi-platform Geekbench is often used to evaluate the system under Mac, although it can run on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test CPU performance.
Geekbench 2
On our site you can find up to 200 processor models that have test results in this program. To date, there are more recent versions, 4v and fifth. Outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In fact, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This is the most suitable test for multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs. Number of frames processed per second. — result of checking. This test is faster compared to Pass 2, as encoding occurs at the same speed. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Ryzen 7 5800X is significantly faster at 339FPS But the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U did a poor job, its speed was 202 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. As a result, we get a better quality video file. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is already done at a variable rate. You need to be aware that a very real task is being carried out, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video encoders. The final value is also measured in frames per second. That is why the results of testing realistically assess the performance of the system. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Ryzen 7 5800X processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 152 Frames / s. Its rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 80 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
This test is often used by gamers and fans of overclocking processors and overclockers. Created using the DirectX 9.0 API by the Finnish team Futuremark. Processors are tested in 2 ways: artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and another test emulates the system using PhysX. Benchmark for testing CPU and video systems. The Ryzen 7 5800X performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 15873. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor coped worse with this task, receiving 11008 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately 2 hundred CPUs on our website have data in the 3DMark FSP test. This is an arithmetic test that performs calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
The well-known file archiver. The tests were performed under the Windows operating system. The speed of compression in the RAR archive was checked, for this huge amounts of random data were generated. The resulting speed during compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the test result. The Ryzen 7 5800X has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, processing files at 15604 KB/s. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U was far behind it, the speed of which did not exceed 4227 Kb / s.
TrueCrypt AES
Not exactly a benchmark, but the results of its use will help to evaluate the performance of the entire system. Our site presents the results of encryption speed in gigabytes per second using the AES algorithm. It includes the function of encrypting disk partitions on the fly. It so happened that support for this project was discontinued in 2014. It can fully function in various Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems. The Ryzen 7 5800X handled partition encryption using the AES algorithm faster, its speed was 15 Gb / s. For the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor, this task was much more difficult, measurements showed a speed of 7.1 Gb / s.
9021 both CPUs are 2
90 million
9 Ryzen 7 3800XT will need a more powerful cooling system, since its thermal dissipation reaches 105 watts
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Boost | Self-overclocking technology from AMD. |
| Name of technology or instruction | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3. | ||
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. |
||
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | ||
| AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | Command system extension. | ||
| AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | Command system extension. | ||
| F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | 16-bit floating point conversion. | ||
| FMA3 (Fused Multiply-Add 3) | Multiply Add with Round One (FMA3). | ||
| SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension. | ||
| AVX 2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2) | Command extension 2. |
||
| BMI1 (Bit manipulation instructions 1) | BMI1 bit control command set. | ||
| AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. |
| Name of technology or instruction | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm extensions) | — | Secure hash algorithm extensions. | |
| SMAP (Supervisor Mode Access Prevention) | Supervisor mode access prevention. | ||
| SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Prevention) | Prevent execution in supervisor mode. |
||
| EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | — | Improved virus protection. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD-V | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMT (Simultaneous MultiThreading) | Simultaneous multithreading. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The main rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all the data, such as test results from all benchmarks, instructions, temperature, number of cores, threads, auto-overclocking technologies, structure, socket, release year , clock speed, and more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms its rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U in most parameters. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U model barely scores 18823.9 compared to the competitor3 points.
PassMark CPU Mark
The benchmark includes a wide range of tests for a comprehensive assessment of the performance of a computer, in particular the CPU. These include extended instruction checking, game physics calculations, integer calculations, floating point calculations, encryption, compression, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. It is also possible to compare the results obtained with other configurations in the database. Perhaps the most popular benchmark tester on the Internet. Almost all CPUs presented on our site have been tested in PassMark. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Ryzen 7 3800XT processor (23957 points) over Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (15550 points). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, with a score of 15550, clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Single version — it uses only one rendering thread and one core. This benchmark for processors and video cards is now out of date. The main testing mode for speed is spatial light sources, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, multi-level reflections, working with light, global illumination simulation, and procedural shaders. Released by MAXON, it was based on the Cinema 4D 3D editor. Works in operating systems Mac OS X, Windows. The method of geometric optics is used — ray tracing. It is possible to test multi-processor systems. Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U wins Cinebench 10 single thread test with 8379points. But its rival Ryzen 7 3800XT fell sharply behind with 6035 points.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread version is another test option in Cinebench R10 that uses multi-thread and multi-core testing method. It is important to consider that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16. In Cinebench R10 multi-threaded testing, the Ryzen 7 3800XT processor scored 40528 points, thus far ahead of the competitor. In turn, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U received a much lower score: 29574 points.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
64-bit version of CINEBENCH 11.5 benchmark, — can test the processor at 100 percent, using all threads and cores. It differs from older versions, 64 threads are already supported here. Testing the Ryzen 7 3800XT in Cinebench version R11.5 gave 24.2 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. Whereas the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U scores 15.8 points, far behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench R11.5 from Maxon. In this case, Single-Core tests happen using one thread and one core. In checks, as before, the ray tracing method is used, a high-polygonal three-dimensional space is calculated with many crystalline and glass and translucent spheres. His tests are still relevant today. The result of the test is the «frames per second» parameter. Testing in single-threaded mode of the Ryzen 7 3800XT processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 2.36 points, it does not lead much ahead of the competitor. But the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U itself scored 2.12 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core version of Cinebench R15 will test your build to the fullest, showing everything it can do. All threads and cores of the central processor are involved in the process of rendering high-polygonal 3D models. The program is ideal for modern multi-threaded CPUs from Intel and AMD, as it can use 256 threads. The Ryzen 7 3800XT, with a score of 2230, unequivocally scores higher in Cinebench 15’s Multi-Core test, while its rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U lags far behind with a score of 1410 in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from the Finnish company Maxon. It tests the entire system: both video cards and CPU. For processors, the result of the analysis will be the value of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second FPS. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of detailed objects, light sources and reflections. In this version of the Single Core program, only one thread is used for rendering. Ryzen 7 3800XT single-threaded Cinebench R15 scores 219points, slightly ahead of the competitor. With a score of 181 on this test, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is not far behind.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 test. It is the wide cross-platform support for a variety of operating systems and devices that makes Geekbench tests the most valuable now. In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core, the Ryzen 7 3800XT received a score of 36334, slightly higher than the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. In this test, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U scores 32904.14 points.
Geekbench 4.
0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Single-Core test uses 1 thread. The program, like its earlier versions, can be run on operating systems running Mac OS, Linux, Windows. For the first time in this version of the benchmark, both smartphones and tablets running iOS and Android operating systems are supported. The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing home PCs and laptops. The Ryzen 7 3800XT scored higher in Geekbench 4’s single-threaded test, with a score of 6046, but not far ahead of the competition. But the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U itself also scored well at 5619.09 points, slightly outperformed by the Ryzen 7 3800XT.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-thread version of Geekbench 3 — can allow you to stress test your PC and show the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Cross-platform Geekbench is often used to test the system under Mac, but it can work on both Linux and Windows. The basic purpose is to test the performance of processors. The 32-bit version of the benchmark uses one CPU core and one thread.
Geekbench 2
In our archive there are almost 200 processor models that have test data in this program. The old version of the Geekbench 2 benchmark. To date, there are newer versions: 4v and 5v.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The frame rate processed per second is the result of the check. This test is faster than Pass 2, because the calculation is done at the same speed. An ideal test for many threaded CPUs and many cores. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Ryzen 7 3800XT is significantly higher at 271 FPS. But the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U did a poor job, its speed was 202 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. As a result, we get a higher quality video file. You need to understand that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in many video encoders. The resulting value is also defined in frames per second. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is done at a variable rate. Therefore, the test results realistically assess the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Ryzen 7 3800XT processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 119FPS Its rival Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 80 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
CPUs are tested in 2 ways: the game AI does pathfinding and another test simulates the system using PhysX. Benchmark to check the video system, and CPU. This benchmark is often used by overclockers and overclockers and gamers. Written using the DirectX library by the Finnish team Futuremark. The Ryzen 7 3800XT performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 30387. 42. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor coped worse with this task, receiving 11008 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
We can say that almost 200 CPUs on our site have data in the 3DMark FSP test. It includes a math test that makes calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
A familiar archiver. The speed of compression into the RAR format was tested, for this large volumes of random files were used. The resulting speed during processing «Kb / s» — this is the result of testing. Checks were made under Windows control. The Ryzen 7 3800XT has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, processing files at 7467 KB/s. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U was far behind it, the speed of which did not exceed 4227 Kb / s.
TrueCrypt AES
This is not really a tester, but the results of its use will help evaluate the performance of the system. It so happened that support for this program was stopped on May 28, 2014. It has a built-in function of instant encryption of disk partitions. Our site presents the results of encryption speed in Gb / s using the AES algorithm. It can work in different operating systems Mac OS X, Linux and Windows. The Ryzen 7 3800XT handled AES partition encryption faster, with a speed of 11.4 Gb/s. For the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor, this task was much more difficult, measurements showed a speed of 7.1 Gb / s.
AMD A10-5700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors
VS
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in AMD A10-5700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of AMD A10-5700 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
3.40 GHz
Clock frequency
1.70 GHZ
4
Nuclei
8
4.00 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
4.10 GHZ
4,0004 4
Number No
Acceleration
No.
4.00 GHZ
Turbo (4 Cores)
Turbo (8 Cores)
3.10 GHZ
Family and generation of the processor
9000
Internal graphics
It’s hard to compare AMD A10-5700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U when graphics card function and specifications matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
AMD Radeon HD 7660d
003
4
generation
11
version DirectX
12
6
Executive blocks
7,0004 384
Number of shaders
448 9000 9000 9000
9000. 2 GB
2
Number of monitors
3
32 nm
Technology
7 nm
Q3/2012
Release date
0004 Q1/2020
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
Decode
H364
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / EncoDe0003
h365 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode
AVC
Decode / Encode
RAM and PCIe
These are the memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR3-1866
Type of memory
DDR4-3200LPDDR4-4266
Maximum memory
32 GB
2
29000 2
ECC
9000 Memory & Memory PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads, which consequently unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD A10-5700 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
65 W
TDP
15 W
—
Maximum temperature
105 °C
—
Maximum TDP
25 W
—
TDP Down
10 W
Technical Details
4.00 MB
L3-CACHE
8.00 MB
32 NM
9000 9000
TRINITY 9000 TRINITY 9000 TRINITY 9000 Architecture
Renoir (Zen 2)
AMD-V
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
FM2
SOCKET (DEPTITION)
FP6
003
ca. 100 $
Price
Instruction set (ISA)
AMD64
Devices compatible with this processor
You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Lenovo ThinkPad L14, L15
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses 9 different test scenarios0003
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
103 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD
processor
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
300 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1. 70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a popular software for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the processor’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
440 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Cinebench R15 (Single Core)
The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
56 (29%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
188 (100%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
AMD A10-5700
4x 3. 40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
231 (18%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
1264 (100%)
Cinebench R20 (Single Core)
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. This is software used to create 3D shapes. The benchmark runs in single-core mode without considering the possibility of hyper-threading.
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
464 (100%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
This is a new version of the benchmark based on Cinebench R15 (both versions are based on Cinema 4, the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for benchmark tests of multi-core processor performance and hyper-threading capability.
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
3007 (100%)
Cinebench R23 (Single Core)
Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular single-core CPU rendering benchmark Cinebench. We have results for all modern processors
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1. 70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
1184 (100%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular multi-core CPU rendering benchmark, Cinebench. We have results for all modern processors
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
8088 (100%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results
AMD A10-5700
4x 3. 40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
1892 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the processor
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
5210 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
473 (41%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
1148 (100%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
1263 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1. 70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.
AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
4252 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32
AMD A10-5700
4x 3. 40 GHz (4.00 GHz)
614 (42%)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
1433 (100%)
Popular processor comparisons
| one. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Pentium Silver N5030 |
|
| 2. |
AMD A10-4600M vs. AMD A10-5700 |
|
| 3. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. AMD A10-5800K |
|
| four. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. AMD A8-7650K |
|
|
5. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Celeron G5920 |
|
| 6. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Core i3-2100T |
|
| 7. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Core i9-10900K |
|
| eight. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
|
| 9. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Pentium 957 |
|
|
ten. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|
| eleven. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
|
| 12. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Core i5-5250U |
|
| 13. |
Intel Core i7-3770 vs. AMD A10-5700 |
|
| fourteen. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. AMD A9-9425 |
|
|
fifteen. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Celeron N4020 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE runs with 8 and 16 CPU threads It runs at 4.30 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 35 W .CPU connects to socket FP6 CPU This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 . Tjunction keeps below 100°C degrees C. In particular, Renoir (Zen 2) architecture is advanced over 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q3/2020
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U runs with 8 and 16 CPU threads It runs at 4. 10 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 15 W .CPU connects to FP6 CPU socket This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 . Tjunction keeps below 105°C degrees C. In particular, Renoir (Zen 2) architecture is advanced over 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q1/2020
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750GE
AMD Ryzen 7 4700u
Compare details
| 3.10 GHZ | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 4.30GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 4.10 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 3.40 GHz |
| Yes | Hyper Threading | No. |
| Yes | Overclocking | No. |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon 8 Graphics (Renoir) |
GPU |
AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir) |
| no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 7 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 3 | Max. |
3 |
| DDR4-3200 | memory size | DDR4-3200 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory | ||
| No. | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 7nm |
| FP6 | Connector | FP6 |
| 35W | TDP | 15W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q3/2020 | Release date | Q1/2020 |
|
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS.