5500 xt vs rx 590: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 590: What is the difference?

Argon2d-ninja0KH/s110W0KH/W

Astralhash12. 517MH/s86W0.146MH/W

Autolykos246.414MH/s71W0.654MH/W

BCD8.295MH/s115W0.072MH/W

BMW512630.421MH/s116W5.435MH/W

BeamHashII14.1H/s92W0.153H/W

BeamHashIII13.155H/s84W0.157H/W

Blake (2b)1.198GH/s118W0.01GH/W

Blake (2s)2.628GH/s112W0.023GH/W

Blake (2s-Kadena)0.461GH/s—W—GH/W

C119.647MH/s120W0.08MH/W

CNReverseWaltz741. 45H/s90W8.238H/W

Chukwa47.238KH/s114W0.414KH/W

Chukwa215.464KH/s108W0.143KH/W

Circcash921.018KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightConceal1288.5H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightFast—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightFastV2—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightGPU250.17H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightHaven—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightHeavy—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightHeavyX291. 85H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightLiteV71.325KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightR578.8H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightSaber—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV4—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightTurtle4.96KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightUPX2—KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightV8—KH/s—W—KH/W

Cuckaroo29S2.49H/s115W0.022H/W

Cuckaroo29b2.49H/s103W0.024H/W

CuckooBFC42. 77H/s—W—H/W

CuckooCycle1.99H/s—W—H/W

Dedal7.387MH/s89W0.083MH/W

Eaglesong0.439GH/s105W0.004GH/W

Equihash(125,4)18.43H/s119W0.155H/W

Equihash(144,5)31.47H/s111W0.284H/W

Equihash(192,7)18.1H/s116W0.156H/W

Equihash(210,9)116.61H/s92W1.268H/W

Equihash(96,5)—H/s—W—H/W

Equihash+Scrypt5.756KH/s—W—KH/W

Etchash30. 683MH/s94W0.326MH/W

Ethash30.683MH/s94W0.326MH/W

Globalhash10.231MH/s94W0.109MH/W

HMQ17254.647MH/s132W0.035MH/W

Handshake0.117GH/s—W—GH/W

HeavyHash91.994MH/s106W0.868MH/W

Hex6.242MH/s95W0.066MH/W

HoneyComb15.416MH/s77W0.2MH/W

Jeonghash3.936MH/s89W0.044MH/W

KAWPOW11.54MH/s70W0.165MH/W

KangarooTwelve0. 8GH/s130W0.006GH/W

Lyra2REv235.435MH/s130W0.273MH/W

Lyra2REv330.521MH/s86W0.355MH/W

Lyra2vc0ban35.629MH/s130W0.274MH/W

Lyra2z25.361MH/s—W—MH/W

Octopus9.763MH/s62W0.157MH/W

PHI161211.835MH/s104W0.114MH/W

PHI2—MH/s—W—MH/W

Padihash6.282MH/s104W0.06MH/W

Pawelhash4.606MH/s104W0.044MH/W

Phi52. 498H/s88W0.028H/W

ProgPow—H/s—W—H/W

ProgPowSERO9.645MH/s128W0.075MH/W

ProgPowZ9.48MH/s129W0.073MH/W

RandomKEVA—MH/s—W—MH/W

RandomSFX—MH/s—W—MH/W

RandomX—MH/s—W—MH/W

SHA-256csm919.3MH/s129W7.126MH/W

Skein2297.43MH/s129W2.306MH/W

Skunkhash22.977MH/s99W0.232MH/W

SonoA1.179MH/s123W0. 01MH/W

TimeTravel1019.59MH/s110W0.178MH/W

Tribus42.217MH/s113W0.374MH/W

Ubqhash24.82MH/s114W0.218MH/W

Verthash0.339MH/s77W0.004MH/W

VerusHash0.236MH/s66W0.004MH/W

X11k1.526MH/s106W0.014MH/W

X16R7.099MH/s118W0.06MH/W

X16RT7.082MH/s111W0.064MH/W

X16RTVEIL7.091MH/s101W0.07MH/W

X16Rv27.477MH/s125W0. 06MH/W

X16S7.09MH/s105W0.068MH/W

X177.108MH/s108W0.066MH/W

X17R6.812MH/s119W0.057MH/W

X185.638MH/s101W0.056MH/W

X21S4.622MH/s97W0.048MH/W

X22i1.723MH/s89W0.019MH/W

X25X0.851MH/s61W0.014MH/W

Xevan2.463MH/s94W0.026MH/W

Zhash31.86H/s127W0.251H/W

cuckARood292.76H/s60W0.046H/W

cuckARoom290. 63H/s65W0.01H/W

cuckAToo310.26H/s68W0.004H/W

cuckAToo320.1H/s63W0.002H/W

vProgPow3.659MH/s100W0.037MH/W

0022 59 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s

• 1.92 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
  7. 12 TFLOPS vs 5.2 TFLOPS
• 250MHz faster memory speed?
  2000MHz vs 1750MHz
• 60.12 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
  222.48 GTexels/s vs 162.36 GTexels/s
• 32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  256GB/s vs 224GB/s
• 128bit wider memory bus?
  256bit vs 128bit
• 896 more stream processors?
  2304 vs 1408
• 56 more texture units (TMUs)?
  144 vs 88
• 3°C lower GPU idle temperature?
  30°C vs 33°C

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660

AMD Radeon RX 590

VS

NVIDIA GTX 1660 TI

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 9000

VS

MSI RADEN RADEN0003

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 TI

AMD Radeon RX 590

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT XT XT XT XT XTAI VS0261 10. 0 /10

1 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

10.0 /10

1 votes

10.0 /10

1 votes

9000 10

1 Votes

10.0 /10

1 Votes

003

Fan noise

10.0 /10

1 Votes

10.0 /10

1 Votes

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1607MHz

1469MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.Turbo GPU

1845MHz

1545MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3. pixel rate

59 GPixel/s

49.54 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

5.2 TFLOPS

7.12 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

162.36 GTexels/s

222.48 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

2000MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

14000MHz

8000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

224GB/s

256GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4. memory bus width

128bit

256bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5.versions of GDDR memory

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✖AMD Radeon RX 590

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✔AMD Radeon RX 590

The video card has the ability to connect multiple displays. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5.GPU Temperature at Boot

Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✖AMD Radeon RX 590

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✔AMD Radeon RX 590

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✖AMD Radeon RX 590

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 590)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✔AMD Radeon RX 590

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI 3.Version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price match

Cancel

Which graphic cards are better?

Video card Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon RX590. Compare?

Video card

Author Alexey Bodrov Reading 4 min. Views 104 Posted 03/01/2020
Updated 03/01/2020

Good day to all, in today’s test we will compare the top video card of the previous line from AMD RX 590 with the junior card of its new line RX 5500 XT. If you look at the prices, they are about the same if you take into account the 8 GB version.

For comparison, versions from Gigabyte were taken.

Contents

1. Appearance and
   construction
2. Performance
3. Game tests

9007

Design in
black with orange accents could be seen in both the RX 580 and
earlier models. The length is only 232 mm. The card can be easily
fit into small cases where there is no room for large video cards.

In terms of cooling, everything is the same as with previous cards, a massive heatsink with
One direct contact heat pipe helps to remove heat from the hot chip. At
This video card chip is very hot and can peak at 82 degrees. Medium
temperature at maximum continuous load is kept within 75-78
degrees, which may not be very positive for a long distance. Important
understand that problems are possible with a constant load on the video card around the clock,
when playing 5-6 hours a day, nothing will happen to the video card.

Now consider the RX 5500 XT, its black laconic and strict design is good
suitable for any build. They are also slightly shorter than their «competitor», her
length is only 225 mm. The video card is not equipped with a backlight, which is rather
all for the best, since the backlighting would be knocked out of the strict design of the card.

The card has excellent cooling, two fans, a massive heatsink with two
heat pipes that have direct contact with the graphics chip. The chip itself
cold and reaches a maximum temperature of 68 degrees, the average
temperature around 64-65 degrees. These are excellent figures for
performance of this card.

	RX 590	RX5500XT
DVI-D	one	—
HDMI	one	one
display port	3	3

RX 590 has 3 DisplayPort
and 1 HDMI like the RX 5500 XT, but DVI-D is also available.

	RX 590	RX5500XT
Memory size	8 GB	8 GB
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Core frequency	1560 MHz	1845 MHz
Memory frequency	8000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory interface	256 bit	192 bit
stream processors	2304	1408

The technical characteristics of video cards are the same only in terms of volume
random access memory. In all other respects they are completely different. Frequencies
the RX 5500 XT has more graphics core and memory, and the bus width and the number of
RX 59 has more streaming processes0. Let’s see in tests how it affects
FPS in games.

Let’s see how our cards perform in games and how big between
them a difference. All tests are carried out on top-end hardware with maximum
graphics settings.

Battlefield V	RX 590	RX5500XT	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	95	103	88	95	7.77%
2k (2560×1440)	70	78	64	72	7.69%

Battlefield V is perfectly optimized for AMD graphics cards. The game is not
the newest, but graphically demanding enough, both cards show themselves
Great. At Full HD resolution, video cards keep FPS almost at the mark
100 frames per second. The difference in performance does not exceed 7%

Destiny 2	RX 590	RX5500XT	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	100	109	92	101	7.34%
2k (2560×1440)	88	94	77	85	9.57%

Destiny 2 MMO shooter that gained its second wave of popularity after the transition
games on Steam. Both in 1080p and 2k FPS on both cards is excellent without
any sagging.

world war z	RX 590	RX5500XT	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	97	102	83	92	9.80%
2k (2560×1440)	68	75	59	68	9.33%

World War Z is a game in the heat of a cooperative shooter, with action elements and
third person survival horror. Dynamic and brutal. Difference in
performance between cards is a little less than 10%, but the RX 5500 XT cannot be called
«lagging behind» it shows excellent results.

Gears of War 5	RX 590	RX5500XT	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	53	60	48	54	10. 00%
2k (2560×1440)	39	44	36	40	9.09%

Gears of War 5 The fifth part of the dynamic shooter. RX 590 keeps average FPS in
around 60 frames, RX 5500 XT is slightly inferior, but it will not achieve 60 frames
problem by slightly lowering a couple of graphics settings.

Metro Exodus	RX 590	RX5500XT	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	34	42	31	38	9.52%
2k (2560×1440)	27	32	23	29	9.38%

Probably the most demanding game in our test today. AT
2k resolution, both cards have drawdowns below 30 FPS, which will be noticeable in
dynamic scenes. In 1080p everything is great and there are no such drawdowns, gameplay
smooth and comfortable.

From the tests it can be concluded that the RX 590 is still a decent
graphics card showing all its capabilities in games. Lots of new stuff coming
on this map with max settings of 60 fps.

RX 5500 XT is an excellent representative of the budget segment, copes with
many games, at 1080p the card shows all its capabilities.
The cold chip and quiet cooling system are its big pluses.

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT video card review: the pain of choice / Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT graphics card review: … The most interesting news The market for sub-$200 accelerators, which is still dominated by cheaper models from 2016, has finally stirred up. Users can now choose between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon RX 5500 XT. But did it get any better? One thing is clear — it has not become easier. The test involves SAPPHIRE and PowerColor video cards with 4 and 8 GB of RAM ⇣ Table of Contents ⇡# General Computing Unlike GCN, which AMD planned to make into a general-purpose architecture that is equally well suited for gaming and non-graphics computing, RDNA was originally designed with a focus on 3D rendering. The tasks of the GP-GPU in it are performed according to the residual principle, and AMD itself has directly stated that the driver for Navi chips is still optimized exclusively for games. However, both versions of the Radeon RX 5500 XT showed encouraging results in several production applications. So, the new products surpassed the performance of the Radeon RX 590 in the Adobe Premiere Pro video editor, which is traditionally unfavorable for AMD accelerators, and reached the highest positions in the Blender Cycles tile renderer. But there are also directly opposite examples — such as the synthetic ray tracing benchmark LuxMark. As for the comparison with NVIDIA products that are in the same price range with the Radeon RX 5500 XT, it seems that the unconditional hegemony of the «red» video chips in GP-GPU tasks has come to an end. Now much more depends on the specifics of each application and how the computational load it creates falls on the architecture of a particular manufacturer. ⇡# Video Encode/Decode The Radeon RX 5700 (XT) and the new RX 5500 XT are nearly equivalent in performance to the integrated H.264, HEVC and VP9 video decoder. Both GPUs in the Navi family are capable of playing HEVC and VP9 recordings at resolutions up to 8K at 42 FPS. However, only in the speed of working with H.264 material in 4K can AMD products oppose something to NVIDIA Turing chips. However, the performance margin of the decoder, which clearly exceeds the needs of a home theater, is only useful for fast conversion or scaling of recordings, and for this, owners of the Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 5700 (XT) will need a powerful CPU, and here’s why. The premiere of the Radeon RX 5700 (XT) was accompanied by an extremely raw driver that did not allow the use of the built-in hardware HEVC encoder, and H.264 encoding occurred at a reduced speed. The release of devices based on the next Navi chip gave us a good reason to return to this issue, and for good reason. Now both Navi 10 and Navi 14 are finally able to record the video stream in HEVC, but the performance is comparable, at best, to what the NVENC encoder is capable of in the original version of the GeForce GTX 1650, which NVIDIA copied from the Volta chip. The rest of the Turings, including the GTX 1650 SUPER, have much faster HEVC write speeds and support 8K resolution in addition. Also, while the latest Radeon driver restored the functionality of the HEVC encoder, the H.264 encoder, on the contrary, broke. The frame rate at 1080p even increased, and Navi 14 was faster than Navi 10, but at 4K, the ffmpeg package simply cannot complete the work on both chips. However, there is still a possibility that the reason is the individual incompatibility of the API of the «red» accelerators and the ffmpeg libraries, but the GCN architecture chips pass these tests without any difficulties. ⇡# Gaming Test Results, Energy Efficiency and Pricing Now that we have all the performance and power consumption data for the Radeon RX 5500 XT, it’s a shame not to compare the new chip to older AMD products in terms of FPS per watt and unit area. The energy efficiency ratings given by the chip maker hit the bull’s-eye: the 8 GB version of the RX 5500 XT really outperforms the Radeon RX 580 and RX 590 by 61% and 65%, respectively, and the performance in terms of chip size increased by 41-55% due to advanced 7nm FinFET process technology. But even though the Navi 14 die is smaller than the Polaris 10/20/30, and thanks to the new architecture and high clock speeds of the Radeon RX 5500 XT, the same number of shader ALUs are not required to beat the Radeon RX 580 games, the RDNA circuit design requirements for transistor budget in this case turned out to be no less than that of GCN. However, this is partly due to the fact that AMD does not use fully functional Navi 14 silicon in the Radeon RX 5500 XT. In addition, the fewer shader ALUs on the die, the greater the share of the overall control logic and uncore blocks (external interface controllers, video codecs, and etc.), which scale poorly and in the Navi 10 and Navi 14 chips for the most part should be the same. Manufacturer AMD NVIDIA Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB) Radeon RX 580 (8 GB) Radeon RX 590 (8 GB) GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB, 9 Gb/s) GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GPU Navi 14 Polaris 20XT Polaris 30XT GP106 TU116 TU116 TU106 Microarchitecture RDNA GCN 4th generation GCN 4th generation Pascal Turing Turing Turing Process technology, nm 7nm FinFET 14 nm FinFET 14 nm FinFET 16 nm FinFET 12 nm FFN 12 nm FFN 12 nm FFN Number of transistors, million 6400 5 700 5 700 4400 6600 6600 6600 Chip area, sq. mm 158 221 221 200 284 284 284 Average power consumption (Crysis 3), W 137 199 224 120 95 107 107 Capacity/W 100% −38% −39% +4% +39% +37% +56% Productivity/million transistors 100% +1% +11% +32% −7% +4% +18% Capacity/sq. mm 100% −36% −29% −28% −46% -40% −32% Capacity/W (reverse comparison) 100% +61% +65% −3% −28% −27% −36% Performance/million transistors (reverse comparison) 100% -1% -10% −24% +7% −4% −15% Capacity/sq. mm (reverse comparison) 100% +55% +41% +40% +87% +68% +48% But against the background of the competitor’s proposals, everything is not so rosy. The only thing that Navi 14 managed to achieve was to catch up and overtake Pascal in terms of performance per watt and, of course, per square millimeter of area. Compared to the closest member of the Turing family, the TU116, NVIDIA retained a huge power efficiency advantage, starting at 37% on the GeForce GTX 1660 and rising to 56% on the GTX 1660 SUPER. But looking at the Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT, you might think that AMD is already close to parity with NVIDIA in the energy efficiency of graphics processors — the older Navi has only 20% left to gain at most 20% compared to direct competitors. However, in this case, the calculations are far from scientific accuracy, because all devices based on the TU116, except for the GTX 1660 Ti, are also equipped with cut-down GPUs, and the 1660 SUPER, in addition, significantly outperforms the Radeon RX 5500 XT in terms of RAM bandwidth. We would be careful not to give a final assessment of Navi 14 silicon, but, whatever one may say, in practice, all the proportions from the table are completely fair and do not honor the new AMD product. 1920 × 1080 FSAA AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (4 GB) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB) AMD Radeon RX 570 (4 GB) AMD Radeon RX 580 (8 GB) AMD Radeon RX 590 (8 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (9Gb/s, 6GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (4 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (6 GB) Assassin’s Creed Odyssey TAA High 26 / 33 35 / 41 26 / 29 32 / 37 35 / 39 38 / 42 25 / 30 36 / 42 43 / 49 43 / 51 Battlefield V TAA High 35 / 66 72 / 87 64 / 76 71 / 83 76 / 91 65 / 80 36 / 56 69 / 88 76 / 93 97 / 107 Borderlands 3 TAA 37 / 42 44 / 48 29 / 34 33 / 38 37 / 43 32 / 37 24 / 28 33 / 38 39 / 44 42 / 49 DiRT Rally 2. 0 MSAA 4x + TAA 44 / 56 43 / 56 32 / 39 37 / 46 42 / 51 32 / 48 25 / 38 32 / 47 40 / 58 45 / 65 Far Cry 5 TAA 75 / 84 75 / 84 54 / 60 62 / 69 71 / 78 67 / 73 50 / 56 72 / 81 74 / 82 83 / 95 Forza Horizon 4 MSAA 4x + FXAA 35 / 49 59 / 70 44 / 52 52 / 63 57 / 69 53 / 62 41 / 50 60 / 71 65 / 78 73 / 87 Metro Exodus TAA 14 / 27 15 / 28 12 / 22 14 / 24 16 / 27 14 / 25 11 / 18 16 / 25 17 / 28 19 / 32 Red Dead Redemption 2 TAA High ID 21 / 25 ID 17 / 22 20 / 24 16 / 19 14 / 18 19 / 24 21 / 25 23 / 28 Shadow of the Tomb Raider SMAA 4x 25 / 35 32 / 41 23 / 33 29 / 39 32 / 43 31 / 39 25 / 30 37 / 45 38 / 48 44 / 55 Strange Brigade AA Ultra 65 / 90 64 / 89 59 / 78 65 / 89 71 / 96 64 / 81 52 / 64 76 / 94 77 / 97 89 / 116 Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 TAA Ultra 33 / 44 39 / 49 20 / 37 37 / 46 43 / 52 33 / 40 21 / 27 40 / 48 43 / 52 47 / 58 Total War: THREE KINGDOMS TAA 17 / 23 17 / 25 14 / 18 18 / 24 19 / 26 21 / 27 13 / 17 18 / 23 23 / 29 27 / 35 Max. +43% +15% +29% +41% +27% +2% +45% +59% +78% Avg. +14% −13% +3% +13% +3% −24% +10% +22% +39% Min. -1% −30% −18% −9% -14% −39% −16% −2% +13% Approx. To line up the two versions of the Radeon RX 5500 XT and other budget graphics cards at retail prices, we had to use different sources. The pricing for the RX 5500 XT is what AMD recommends and will hopefully be true. We took the rest from market.yandex.ru. ⇡# Pins AMD finally has an adequate replacement for accelerators based on the older Polaris series chips, which have earned the well-deserved love of thrifty gamers (and greedy miners), but, to be honest, have been asking for retirement for a long time. The Radeon RX 5500 XT offers performance on par with the Radeon RX 580 or RX 590 and the same amount of RAM, but at the same time, the RDNA architecture and 7nm process technology allowed AMD to drastically cut power consumption, and the company’s partners to start producing simple and cheap devices that can easily cope with Navi 14.9 chip cooling0003 However, if we take for comparison with the Radeon RX 5500 XT not the obviously outdated Polaris, but the new GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, the characteristics of which NVIDIA specially tweaked to spoil the debut of AMD’s budget card, then the choice between the two accelerators will not be easy at all. In terms of GPU performance, they are almost equivalent: as always, there are clearly “red” and clearly “green” games, but Navi 14 managed to bring the average advantage over the cut-down TU116 to 2% FPS. In terms of performance per watt, on the contrary, NVIDIA is in the lead, and this time the Navi chip lagged behind its direct competitor much more than the Navi 10 on the RX 5700 (XT) boards from the older Turings. However, one should not overestimate the importance of energy efficiency when it comes to accelerators with a power of 95–130 W. Both versions of the Radeon RX 5500 XT we tested — SAPPHIRE Pulse and PowerColor Red Dragon — are extremely cool and very quiet, despite their relatively high heat dissipation. A completely different issue is on the agenda — the amount of RAM. If the requirements of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with difficulty, but squeezed into 4 GB, then the new Navi 14, due to the specifics of the architecture or driver, is absolutely not enough. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, with the same amount of RAM as the Radeon RX 5500 XT, came out 10% FPS ahead in the total score in 12 games, and in individual cases the outcome was much worse for the new AMD. Of course, if you give both accelerators an indulgence and reset the graphics quality settings, then the situation will improve, and the younger version of the Radeon RX 5500 XT will even start to work out a slightly higher retail price. But we are not only talking about games in which budget video cards are kept on the verge of a frame rate of 30 FPS. Many modern demanding projects Navi 14 pulls even at maximum speeds, and sometimes with a comfortable frame rate beyond 60 FPS. You just need to take off the cement shoes 4 GB of RAM. It’s too early for NVIDIA fans to gloat. It seems that RDNA chips really do not manage the limited amount of local memory as efficiently as Turing, but algorithm optimization is also not omnipotent. Game developers are already focusing on video cards with 6 GB of memory or more, and why on the threshold of 2020 should GPUs have enough RAM as in 2016? Sooner or later, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER will suffer the same fate, and then the miser will pay twice. “Knows who,” AMD fans will add. It turns out that the only worthy candidate for a purchase in the budget sector is the 8-gigabyte modification of the Radeon RX 5500 XT? Ah, if only everything were so simple! The fact is that AMD priced it at $ 199 or 14,999 rubles, and from here it’s already a stone’s throw to the simplest variants of the GeForce GTX 1660. So you’re thinking, why not give up on this budget sector of yours and take something more powerful right away? But if money is tight, and the soul does not lie with the old Radeon RX 580/590 or GeForce GTX 1060, then personally we don’t see a fundamental difference between the 4 GB RX 5500 XT and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — in practice, much more will depend not on chip, but from the binding and cooling of specific implementations of one or another video card. ← Previous page ⇣ Contents Page 1 — Navi 14 GPU. Specifications, prices. Test video cards Page 2 — Testing methodology. Clock speeds, power consumption, temperature, noise level and overclocking. 3DMark gaming benchmarks (1920×1080) Page 3 — Overclocking performance § 3DMark: Overclocking § Gaming tests (1920×1080): overclocking Page 4 — General purpose calculations. Video encoding/decoding. Results tables. conclusions If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER. Related Content Permanent URL: https://3dnews.ru/999597/obzor-amd-radeon-rx-5500-xt/page-1.html Tags: graphics card, amd, radeon rx 5500 xt, sapphire, powercolor ⇣ Comments

Review and test ASUS ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition 8 GB — i2HARD

Vitaly Kolmykov

March 31, 2020

Energy efficient 7nm graphics card from AMD. The ASUS ROG series traditionally attracts increased attention — let’s see what the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition from ASUS is capable of.

For quite a long time, in the initial «gaming» segment of video cards, AMD offered solutions based on Polaris chips, which are in fact the top solutions of past generations with the corresponding level of heat dissipation and power consumption. The Radeon 5500 XT will offer a similar level of performance to the RX 590, but with much less appetite and power supply requirements, the 7nm process solves all the backlog.

Specifications

	Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU	Navi 14 XTX
Shader ALUs	1408
Boost core frequency	845 MHz
texture blocks	88
ROP blocks	32
Memory size	8 GB
Memory type	GDDR6
Memory frequency	14 GHz
Memory bus	128 Bit
PCI Express	4. 0x8

Support for the new PCIe 4.0 standard is noteworthy, doubling the bandwidth of the interface lines is a definite plus, but the lines have also become two times smaller. PCIe 4.0 support on the motherboard side is now available only on new AMD products. Will it turn out that without a new interface, the card will lose performance? I hasten to reassure — testing on systems with different versions of the interface did not reveal significant differences.

Appearance and packaging

The ROG STRIX series from ASUS is the subject of much attention from enthusiasts. The Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition will be in your hands in a luxurious colorful box.

Learning how to pack isn’t the most exciting thing to do, but ASUS’ decision to replace the foam with a tricky cardboard-and-film transformer certainly arouses curiosity.

ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT received a new cooling shroud design for the STRIX series — it looks serious. Plastic, although it does not scream about its premium quality, but it looks soundly.

The fresh design of the axial-tech fans, with the blade edges united in a circle, not only looks memorable, but should also provide more efficient airflow.

The cooling system occupies three slots, under the casing there is a two-section radiator, five heat pipes are in charge of heat transfer. For the declared energy consumption, the design is clearly made with a large margin, which should have a positive effect on acoustic comfort and temperature conditions.

The back side of the card is covered with a backplate. The logo and name of the series are not illuminated, which is new for the STRIX series. The video card is just over 28 cm long, so it will be possible to place it in most cases without difficulty.

Several elements are compactly located in the backplate cutout: an 8-pin additional power connector with a connection indicator light, a backlight off button, and a BIOS version switch.

Initially, the two BIOS options are labeled as P — Performance (maximum performance option) and Q — Quiet (lower fan speeds will provide less noise at the cost of a small performance loss).

Signal output can be done via one HDMI 2.0b and three DisplayPort 1.4.

The ROG series logo on the end of the card is responsible for the backlight, the color and mode of operation can be configured by ASUS AURA. The restraint of illumination on the video card will definitely find its fans, but ASUS has already accustomed us to the festival of colors on each STRIX product.

Testing

The following system was used as a test bench:

• CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K 5 GHz
• Motherboard: Asus Maximus XI Apex
• RAM: G.Skill Trident Z 2×8 GB (F4-3600C15D-16GTZ) 4400 MHz CL17
• SSD: NVMe WD Black SN700 500 GB (Windows 10 Pro with all updates)
• SSD: SATA Crucial MX500 1TB (gaming)
• Power Supply: Cooler Master V1200 Platinum 1200 W

GPU-Z confirms all the declared characteristics, on the Intel PCIe platform it is available only in version 3. 0.

The operating parameters of the video card are perfectly demonstrated by the ten-minute Fire Strike Ultra stress test.

The frequency is kept very close to the declared maximum, the average power consumption of the chip is just over 115 watts. The average fan speed is 1330 rpm, which is in a quiet range for an impeller with a diameter of less than 100 mm, and for a high-quality fan of this size, it is almost silent. Compared to other PC components, the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT cooling system is absolutely indistinguishable during the stress test. The temperature regime is expectedly excellent — 64 ° maximum.

Let’s get down to the games, each diagram of the final FPS values ​​is accompanied by a recording of one of the test runs with full monitoring of all system parameters.

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

• Resolution: 1080p
• Graphics Quality: Highest
• Built-in test

Far Cry 5

• Resolution: 1080p
• Graphic quality: maximum
• Built-in test

Tom Clancy’s The Division 2

• Resolution: 1080p
• Graphic quality: maximum
• Built-in test

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

• Resolution: 1080p
• Graphics Quality: Uber
• Built-in test

In all games except Metro Exodus, the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT delivers excellent FullHD performance at or near maximum settings.

Acceleration

As a starting point in the study of overclocking potential, I will take the result in the Fire Strike Ultra benchmark from the 3DMark package.

The result of the video card without overclocking is 3519 points.

The average value of the chip frequency during the passage of a long segment is 1832 MHz, the average power consumption over the same period is 111 W. To change the frequencies of the chip and memory, we will use the capabilities of the driver in the performance settings tab.

For a chip voltage value of 1150 mV, the stable value of the maximum boost turned out to be at around 2000 MHz, let’s expand the power limit by a maximum of 20%, which, most likely, is even redundant.
The memory was able to work stably at the maximum available in the driver 1860 MHz or 14880 MHz effective.

Run the Fire Strike Ultra stress test with the new settings.

The average chip frequency is kept at around 1950 MHz, which is more than 100 MHz more than the factory setting. At the same time, the average chip consumption increased slightly — up to 127 W, there is still a power limit reserve — you can try your luck at a higher voltage. The cooling will definitely do the trick, 62° on average with the fans still running quietly.

Let’s evaluate the increase in performance in the Fire Strike Ultra benchmark.

3744 points, a little more than 6% increase, not much, but overclocking did not affect temperatures or acoustic comfort.

Conclusion

With the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition, you can feel the desire of ASUS to reduce the final cost of the card, but not to lose in the efficiency of the solution. As a result, we got a card not only with excellent overclocking potential, a powerful cooling system, but also with a price that does not stand out against the background of direct competitors represented by cards from other AMD partners.

Benefits:

• Low chip temperatures even when overclocked
• Silent cooling system
• Strict design
• High overclocking potential

Might not suit:

• Oversized graphics card
• Poorly equipped with RGB lighting
• High price version with 8 GB memory

Review and test of the Intel Core i5-9600k processor: 6-core for overclocking!

What can the 6-core Intel Core i5-9600k offer for overclockers, and to what frequency can this processor be overclocked on a mid-range motherboard? Answers to these and other questions in the material of the I2HARD. ru editorial board.

Overview and testing of the be quiet! System Power 9 500W

All models of power supplies from the well-known German manufacturer be quiet!, including the System Power line, designed for users with a limited budget, have been in our editorial office. At the beginning…

Review and test of the power supply Cougar VTE 600W

In our editorial office, several power supplies of different models manufactured by Cougar have already been tested. Not so long ago, budget representatives of the STE and STX series were considered, now it has come up …

SAPPHIRE NITRO + RX 5500 XT SE

SAPPHIRE NITRO + RX 5500 XT SE

The SAPPHIRE website uses cookies to improve the user experience

Visit Privacy for information on how to disable cookies.

I agree

• NITRO RX 6000 Series
• NITRO RX 5000 Series
• NITRO RX 500 Series
• Previous generation

Open all NITRO

• Introduction
• Game applications
• Features
• SAPPHIRE

VIDEO CARDS FEATURES

• Components
• Radeon
• Adrenalin
• TriXX
• Specification

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5500 XT Special Edition

The SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5500 XT Special Edition graphics card delivers the ultimate in 1080p PC gaming experience. The NITRO+ RX 5500 XT features renowned SAPPHIRE high quality components such as our efficient 95mm fans and an improved cooling shroud for the incredible performance and stability every gamer needs. Signature additional features include easy-to-swap fans with Quick Connect technology that work with Intelligent Fan Control and Dual-X Fan Cooling for efficient heat dissipation with low noise and high reliability. Incredibly aesthetic ARGB fan and shroud illumination enhance the look of your gaming PC with customization in our TriXX software. Use our new TriXX Boost feature to boost the performance of your favorite games to take first place among your friends while you play. Get a NITRO boost with the SAPPHIRE NITRO + RX 5500 XT Special Edition!

IMMERSION WITH GAME DYNAMICS

HD games

• Forza Horizon 4
• Gears of War 5
• The Outer Worlds
• Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
• Ghost Recon Breakpoint
• Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

HD Games

CHANGE THE RULES

Accurate Game Graphics

to 1845 MHz Frequency Boost

14.

4 Gbps effective

7nm FinFET

ARGB backlight & ARGB fan

Cooling Dual-X

Fan Quick Connect

SAPPHIRE VIDEO CARDS FEATURES

Discover all the incredible features of the SAPPHIRE NITRO RX 5500 XT Special Edition! We have divided our features into 3 categories so you can see at a glance all the features we are proud to provide the best gaming experience for you

Cooling Dual-X

Boost frequency Up to 1845 MHz

Game frequency Up to 1737 MHz

An innovative combination of efficient VRM cooling and individual memory coolers work in tandem to effectively dissipate heat in all sections

Our 95mm fan blades are streamlined for more airflow and superior heatsink coverage with less noise than standard cooling system designs.

Sapphire’s signature Dual-X cooling features two oversized, quiet fans and a state-of-the-art heatsink.

Learn More

Specification

• #SKU#: 11295-05-20G SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5500XT 8G GDDR6 Special Edition

GPU

Radeon™ RX 5500
2nd generation 7nm process technology
RDNA architecture

GPU Clock

• Boost Clock Up to 1845MHz
• Game frequency Up to 1737 MHz

Game Clock is the expected GPU clock when running typical gaming applications, set to typical TGP(Total Graphics Power). Actual individual game clock results may vary.


Stream Processors

1408

Memory size/bus

8GB/128-bit GDDR6

Memory frequency

14. 4 Gbps effective

Displays

Max 4 displays

Approval

HDMI™: 4096×2160@60Hz
DisplayPort 1.4: 5120×2880@60Hz

Interface

PCI-Express 4.0

Outputs

• 2x HDMI
• 2x DisplayPort

BIOS support

• Dual UEFI

API

• Vulkan®
• OpenGL® 4.6
• OpenCL 2.0
• DirectX® 12
• Shader Model 6.4

Game Resolution

Extreme gaming settings in 1080p

SAPPHIRE Technology

• Sapphire TriXX Support
• TriXX Boost
• BIOS software switch
• Max Boost
• Power Design
• ARGB LED light for logo and fans
• Addressable ARGB fan lighting
• NITRO Glow
• ARGB sound visualization
• Fan Check
• Free Flow
• Support for VR devices
• Intelligent Fan Control
• Precision fan control
• Efficient cooling VRM
• Efficient video memory cooling
• Cooling Dual-X
• Backplate (Metal reinforcement plate)
• Double ball bearings
• Fan Quick Connect
• Fuse protection
• Dual BIOS

Technology

• RDNA Architecture
• Second generation 7 nm process technology
• GDDR6 memory
• Power Efficiency
• PCI Express 4. 0 support
• Video Streaming up to 8K
• Display Port 1.4 (HBR3) / DSC
• Radeon™ Software
• Radeon™ Boost
• Radeon™ Image Sharpening
• Radeon™ Anti-Lag
• AMD FidelityFx
• Async Compute
• Radeon™ Rays Audio + True Audio Next
• Radeon™ FreeSync™ 2 HDR
• Radeon™ VR Ready Premium

Cooling

• Dual-X Cooling
• 2 fans
• Double ball bearings

Form factor

2.2 slots, ATX

Dimensions: 257x 132.8 x 44.2 mm

Power consumption

• 135 W

OS

Requires 64-bit OS

Linux®, Windows® 10, Windows® 7

System Requirements

• 1 x 8-pin power cable.
• PCI Express® based PC with one X16 graphics slot on the motherboard.
• The minimum amount of system memory is 4GB. 8GB recommended.
• Specifications provided here are for guidance only. Please check with your regional distributor or dealer for latest specifications.
• Colors of PCB or other components may differ from those illustrated.
• SAPPHIRE reserves the right to update or revise specifications without prior notice.
• All trademarks and logos are acknowledged as the property of their respective holders.

*The terms HDMI, HDMI High-Definition Multimedia Interface, and the HDMI Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of HDMI Licensing Administrator, Inc.

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6950 XT PURE Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

OC BIOS Up to 2435MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 18 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6950 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2324MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 18 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6900 XT SE Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2365MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6900 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2285MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 XT SE Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2360MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2360 MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2190MHz 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6750 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2623MHz, 12GB/192-bit DDR6. 18 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6700 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2622MHz, 12GB/192-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6650 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 8GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2694MHz 8GB/128-bit DDR6. 17.5 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6600 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 8GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

2607MHz, 8GB/128-bit DDR6. 16Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700XT 8G GDDR6 Special Edition

2035MHz 8GB/256-bit GDDR6. 14.4 Gb/s

Learn more

SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700XT 8G GDDR6

2010MHz 8GB/256-bit GDDR6. 14 Gb/s

Join the community

Big test AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

• Game tests
• Should I take it?

Hello, dear readers of the site Uspei. com. The Radeon RX 5500 XT is a highly anticipated update to popular AMD graphics cards. It should replace the Polaris family, which has undergone a rebranding with overclocking and a change in process technology since 2016.

Apparently, all the juices from the bearded architecture have already been squeezed out, and AMD has seriously decided in the wake of successful Ryzen releases to offer something new in the most popular price niche for video cards under $200.

In the meantime, in this segment, the cards of the past and the year before last from nVidia have long and firmly settled down, which itself cannot convince buyers to upgrade.

AMD’s New GPU Navi 14 based on RDNA architecture, made using 7nm process technology.

This chip was tasked by AMD with to kill three birds with one stone : to enter the market of notebooks, OEMs and discrete video cards in the 5500M, 5500 and 5500XT versions respectively. These options have on board 22 computing modules, 1408 stream processors and differ only in frequencies and power consumption.

AMD’s slides emphasize the tiny GPU footprint, power efficiency over the Radeon RX 480, and gaming edge over NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 1650 and 1650 Super. 1650 Super is just what we have, as well as «inconvenient» for AMD RX 590, which the company decided not to remember, but in vain. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

It was a dubious move to point out the superiority of the 8 GB version over the 4 GB version. Why all of a sudden cards with the same GPUs at the same frequencies can be so different in FPS? And at what FPS, minimum, average, maximum?

The fact is that the number of PCI-Express lanes in the RX 5500 is not 16, like most cards, but 8. It is not known what this step is connected with, but judging by the test results on the network, there really is a difference.

But they did not forget to brag about the support of the 4th version of PCI-Express. Well, let’s look at the novelty in action.

To be tableties ↑

Tests in games

We will compare it with the 2018 Polaris model in the person of RX 590 and video cards of a competitor on the budget Turn: GTX 1650, fresh 1650 Super and 1660.

9000

in in in in Borderlands 3 RX 5500 XT at first glance shows itself cheerfully, but regular jerks spoil the picture: the worst results of very rare events of all participants. It might be fixed in newer versions of the drivers.

In the Ghost Recon Breakpoint , jerking also does not allow you to enjoy the smoothness. You can’t write off the lack of video memory: 8 GB should be enough for this game.

And here is the first win in Call of Duty Modern Warfare : you can’t call it confident, because the RX 590 is on the heels of both the average and the minimum FPS. There are no problems with smoothness this time.

But in The Division 2 , the novelty could not catch up with Polaris a year ago, winning only a few frames from its rival GTX 1650 Super.

The difference in the results of the top three in Far Cry New Dawn is so negligible that it can be attributed to measurement error. However, the RX 5500 XT is one frame clear of the GTX 1660 and leads the test.

Gears 5 the newcomer needed only slightly smoother visuals to win. No special jerks were noticed, but statistics are statistics.

Metro Exodus , ultra settings, no tessellation and Hairworks. Nothing has changed here: the new drivers from AMD have not eliminated the problems with smoothness, and the leadership is still with the cards from nVidia.

In Need For Speed ​​Heat the difference between all cards except 1650 must be looked for with a magnifying glass. Not a single video card has problems with smoothness, however, there are no stable 60 FPS either, and a magnifying glass will not help here.

In Red Dead Redemption 2 , last year’s RX 590 shows itself confidently at medium settings, beating the 5500 XT by 3 frames both in terms of average and minimum FPS.

In Resident Evil 2 RX 590 is even more ahead of even more expensive rivals from nVidia. And this is on DirectX 11, by the way.

Star Wars Fallen Order0 managed to outperform the more recent 5500 XT in minimum FPS. And yes, we’ll talk about the price difference a little later.

And finally, the native element for AMD cards — World War Z . It would seem, where, if not in this game, to show the superiority of the new architecture? But no, again a confident victory for the RX 590, this time over all the participants.

To the table of contents ↑

Is it worth taking?

As for overclocking, we can say that it does not exist. 110 MHz for memory and 85 MHz for the chip is all that can be squeezed out without exceeding the limits set by AMD.

Undervolt at 100 millivolts seems to work, but does not give boost, it is impossible to check the voltage on the chip in overlay Radeon Software , and MSI Afterburner is not yet able to control and monitor the voltage on the RX 5500 XT. As a result — plus a couple of frames in overclocking for the average FPS, and minus a couple for the minimum.

If you are not interested in energy efficiency and want hardcore overclocking, it is possible to remove all limits set by AMD with program More Power Tool.

The guys from the site igorlabs have already experimented with the card, took 2.1 GHz on the chip, increasing the card’s appetite up to 250 watts. There was little sense from this: one or two bonus frames turned into jerks and friezes.

In general, the video card came out controversial. It definitely did not become a breakthrough, both in terms of performance and energy efficiency. The 130W TDP isn’t as impressive as the 80W in laptops where the 1660 Ti dominates with equal gusto.

Obviously, there is no point in updating Polaris owners. A low price could have spurred on the purchase of those who are just about to purchase their first PC, but this did not work out either. The recommended price of 170 and $200 for the 4 and 8 GB versions looks unconvincing against the background of widely available cards on Polaris, which are not particularly slow.

It’s too early to talk about prices, but at the start of sales, the price is significantly overpriced, although it is gradually falling.

At the same time, the GTX 1650 SUPER is already available for a lot less.

There are no special complaints about the card itself from ASUS in the version of DUAL EVO . This is not a flagship solution, however, even during overclocking, the chip warmed up to only 60 degrees, the video memory to 64, and the fans worked at 50% at a speed of 1718 rpm.