5500 xt vs rx 590: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 590: What is the difference?

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 590: What is the difference?

56points

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

51points

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

AMD Radeon RX 590

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT better than AMD Radeon RX 590?

  • 138MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1607MHzvs1469MHz
  • 9.46 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    59 GPixel/svs49.54 GPixel/s
  • 45W lower TDP?
    130Wvs175W
  • 6000MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    14000MHzvs8000MHz
  • 300MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1845MHzvs1545MHz
  • 700million more transistors?
    6400 millionvs5700 million
  • 8°C lower load GPU temperature?
    73°Cvs81°C
  • 5nm smaller semiconductor size?
    7nmvs12nm

Why is AMD Radeon RX 590 better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT?

  • 1. 92 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    7.12 TFLOPSvs5.2 TFLOPS
  • 250MHz faster memory clock speed?
    2000MHzvs1750MHz
  • 60.12 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    222.48 GTexels/svs162.36 GTexels/s
  • 32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    256GB/svs224GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus width?
    256bitvs128bit
  • 896 more shading units?
    2304vs1408
  • 56 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
    144vs88
  • 3°C lower idle GPU temperature?
    30°Cvs33°C

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

MSI Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon RX 590

vs

Gigabyte Radeon RX 6600 XT Eagle

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

1 User reviews

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

10. 0/10

1 User reviews

AMD Radeon RX 590

1 User reviews

AMD Radeon RX 590

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Fan noise

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1607MHz

1469MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1845MHz

1545MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

59 GPixel/s

49.54 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

5.2 TFLOPS

7.12 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

162.36 GTexels/s

222.48 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

2000MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

14000MHz

8000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

224GB/s

256GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✖AMD Radeon RX 590

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✔AMD Radeon RX 590

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✖AMD Radeon RX 590

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✔AMD Radeon RX 590

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✖AMD Radeon RX 590

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 590)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

✔AMD Radeon RX 590

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT Vs RX 590: Which to Buy?

AMD’s Radeon RX 5500 XT graphics card is a great performer for the money, so is the RX 590 still worth considering? I’ve compared 15 different games at 1080p and 1440p resolutions to help you decide!

RX 5500 XT RX 590
BUY NOW BUY NOW
PROS PROS
Competent 60 fps 1080p performance. Much more efficient than Polaris. Great 1080p performance. Improved clockspeed and efficiency. Strong game bundle.
CONS CONS
4GB variant is notably slower in certain titles. Minor upgrade over the 580. Higher price than the 580. Not as power efficient as Nvidia.

SPECIFICATIONS

OVERVIEW RX 5500 XT RX 590
Card Status Released Released
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Release Date 12th December, 2019 15th November, 2018
Launch Price $169 USD $279 USD
GPU RX 5500 XT RX 590
GPU Model 7nm Navi 14 XTX 12nm Polaris 30 XT
Cores : TMUs : ROPs 1408 : 88 : 32 2304 : 144 : 32
CLOCKS RX 5500 XT RX 590
Base Clock 1607 MHz 1469 MHz
Boost Clock 1717 MHz 1545 MHz
Memory Clock (Effective) 1750 (14000) MHz 2000 (8000) MHz
Computing Power (FP32) 4,525 GFLOPS 6,769 GFLOPS
MEMORY RX 5500 XT RX 590
Memory Size 8192 MB GDDR6 8192 MB GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Memory Bandwidth 224 GB/s 256 GB/s
PHYSICAL RX 5500 XT RX 590
Interface PCI-Express 4. 0 x8 PCI-Express 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power 130 W 225 W

OVERVIEW

RX 5500 XT:

The 5500 XT is going to be available in two variants, 4GB and 8GB. The RX 5700 XT is designed for 1440p and so this new RX 5500 XT is designed to tackle 1080p. In terms of the pricing for the 5500 XT 4GB version start from $169 and the 8GB version start from $179. The main competition of RX 5500 XT is 1650 Super but today we are comparing this model to RX 590.

I am using SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 8GB in this review. 

We have the dual X cooling which obviously involves two fans. If you’re not a fan of the RGB lighting then you’ll be pleased to know that we have none of that present.

In terms of the size, this card is neither large nor small and so it should fit into a good range of different size cases. The length of the card is 230 millimeters, width is 108 millimeters, and height is 40 millimeters.

RX 590:

The RX 590 isn’t really new because it uses the same four generation GCN polaris architecture found in the RX 480 and RX 580. AMD is once again using a design that was first launched about in 2015. The only difference is that they’re using a 12 nanometer manufacturing process instead of the 14 nanometers used on the RX 580.

I am using XFX RX 590 Fatboy 8GB in this review. 

This is one thick card that has 2 large fans. This RX 590 is equipped with an 8 pin and a 6 pin power connector layout and you can actually see how the heat sink huge heat pipes sneak around this area. It’s pretty impressive but it also goes to show how AMD did everything they could to squeeze performance out of their old architecture.

The backplane has a cool design but it’s mostly for show since it doesn’t actively cool any components here, so that’s it for the overview.

PERFORMANCE

For the testing, I’m using the XFX RX 590 FATBOY 8GB and the SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 8GB. The system that I’m testing with has an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X CPU in a Gigabyte X570 GAMING X motherboard running at stock speeds, along with Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro Series 2x8GB DDR4 3600MHz RAMI have also used Cooler Master V1000 SMPS PSU.

These all games are tested at 1080p and 1440p and the FPS are shown are average. Both graphics cards were running at stock speeds.

BATTLEFIELD 5

BATTLEFIELD 5 was tested in campaign mode. At 1080p, RX 5500 XT was 3FPS ahead and when it comes to 1440p, RX 590 was 1FPS ahead. Overall, there is no winner, it’s a tie.

METRO EXODUS

In METRO EXODUS the RX 5500 XT is ahead, with a 2.3% higher average frame rate at 1080p. At 1440p, RX 590 was just 1FPS ahead. Overall, the difference wasn’t that big.

DEVIL MAY CRY 5

DEVIL MAY CRY 5 was tested using the games built in benchmark tool, and the 5500 XT was almost 2% faster at 1080p, and there was no difference at 1440p.

DOOM

DOOM was tested in campaign mode, and there was not that big difference in both the resolutions. RX 590 was ahead in both resolutions. RX 590 was 1FPS ahead in 1080p and 2FPS ahead in 1440p.

FORZA HORIZON 4

FORZA HORIZON 4 was tested with the games benchmark tool. I have to both graphics card were performing good. At 1080p, RX 5500 XT was ahead with 5FPS and at 1440p RX 5500 XT was 1FPS behind.

BORDERLANDS 3

BORDERLANDS 3 which was tested at high settings. At 1080p there was just a 1FPS difference and when coming to 1440p you will see no difference. Overall, RX 590 was performing well.

FORTNITE

Fortnite was tested using the replay feature, with the exact same replay file used for all testing. The results were a little strange here, the 5500 XT was a little ahead, though realistically most of the results were so close together it’s within margin of error, regardless the performance was very similar.

ASSASSINS CREED ODYSSEY

ASSASSINS CREED ODYSSEY was tested with the game’s benchmark tool, and there was a bit more of a difference this time around. RX 5500 XT was ahead at both resolutions.

STAR WARS JEDI

STAR WARS JEDI was tested at high settings. There was not too much difference in both resolutions. RX 590 was 2 FPS ahead at 1080p and 1FPS behind at 1440p.

WOLFENSTEIN

WOLFENSTEIN was tested with the games benchmark tool, and this was another test where the results between the two were essentially close, like many other titles tested, you’re not going to be able to actually notice any difference while playing on either card. But RX 5500 XT was ahead at both resolutions in terms of average FPS.

FAR CRY 5

I’ve tested FAR CRY 5 with the Ulletical FPS benchmark. At 1080p the RX 590 was scoring 2FPS higher, then at 1440p the difference was much closer together, with the 5500 XT was only 1FPS ahead.

GEARS 5

GEARS 5 was tested in the practice range, so while not quite the same as actual gameplay, it allows me to perform the same test pass more accurately which is ideal for comparison purposes. At 1080p the 5500 XT was almost 3FPS higher than the RX 590, then at 1440p it was still 2FPS ahead.

FAR CRY NEW DAWN

FAR CRY NEW DAWN was tested using the built in benchmark, and the RX 5500 XT only had a small 1FPS boost over the RX 590 at 1080p. At 1440p, RX 5500 XT was still ahead.

GTA 5

GTA 5 was tested using the built in benchmark, and was another game that didn’t see much of a difference, well at least at 1440p. At 1080p however, the RX 590 was able to hit an average frame rate 2.3% ahead of the 5500 XT.

APEX LEGENDS

APEX LEGENDS was another title that saw basically no difference at all between the two, at least not one that you’d practically notice anyway, the results were essentially the same.

WHICH ONE YOU SHOULD BUY?

Overall, both graphics card were performing well. I did not find any big difference while playing any of those games. When it comes to price there was not too much difference. Now which graphics card you should buy? I will suggest you to buy RX 5500 XT because it was performing slightly good. And RX 5500 XT is also launched recently which means it will be future proof.


Expert Reviews For RX 5500 XT:

By IGN
The Radeon RX 5500 XT is an affordable on-ramp to Navi, but isn’t the best value.

By PCWorld
AMD’s Radeon RX 5500 XT brings its next-gen navi GPU architecture to the masses, with mixed results. It’s a good budget gaming option that’s priced slightly too high.

By TweakTown
AMD’s new Radeon RX 5500 XT launches, powered by the Navi 14 GPU and packed with GDDR6. It uses 100W+ less power than the RX 580, offering similar performance, and a STACK of new features and tech!

By eTeknix
It all comes down to price, and the margins are already pretty slim here. Nvidia has some competitive cards at this price range and now, so does AMD. There’s certainly nothing wrong with the Sapphire Pulse, but £10, either way, can be a game-changer. For 1080p gaming, it’s perfect for the job, and being the quietest GPU we’ve ever tested is certainly worthy of merit too.

By PCMag
The Radeon RX 5500 XT plays in the video-card zone AMD knows best: budget gaming at 1080p. It’s solid and close, but slightly inconsistent performance in the early going allows Nvidia’s latest line of GeForce GTX Super GPUs to edge it out.

Expert Reviews For RX 590:

By PCGamesN
AMD’s RX 590, especially in this affordable PowerColor Red Devil trim, is the fastest sub-$300 graphics card. Though not much of an upgrade over its predecessory its existence helps make the case for buying an RX 580… at least while stocks last.

By Tomshardware
The new Radeon RX 590 beats Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 6GB across our benchmark suite at 1920 x 1080 and 2560 x 1440. However, AMD took a truncheon to the card’s power limit in order to motivate its Polaris GPU. We think you’re better off scooping up great deals on older Radeon RX 580 8GB cards for high-quality gaming at FHD.

By Hothardware
Ultimately, if you’re budgeting less than $300 for a GPU, the Radeon RX 590 is arguably the best overall choice at this time. It’s the strongest performer in the category and multiple AAA games are being tossed in for good measure.

By Hexus
The Radeon RX 590 represents a relatively quick method of gaining an extra 10 per cent performance over the RX 580(X). And given its similar pricing, the RX 590 is generally ahead of the GTX 1060 6GB.

By PCWorld
The XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy uses brute force and an improved 12nm process to muscle past Nvidia’s GTX 1060, but it doesn’t displace the RX 580 completely.

Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon RX 590 Graphics cards Comparison

When comparing Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 590, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 590 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Check Price

Radeon RX 590

Check Price

Main Specs

  Radeon RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 590
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 175 Watt
Interface PCIe 4. 0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • Radeon RX 590 has 34% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
  • Radeon RX 5500 XT is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Radeon RX 590 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 590 have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Radeon RX 5500 XT is build with RDNA 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 590 — with Polaris.
  • Radeon RX 5500 XT is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 590 — by 12 nm process technology.
  • Radeon RX 590 is 61 mm longer, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 5500 XT is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 590.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 45−50 45−50
ultra / 1080p 30−35 30−35
QHD / 1440p 24−27 24−27
4K / 2160p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 70−75 75−80
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 2% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
high / 1080p 70−75 75−80
ultra / 1080p 65−70 65−70
QHD / 1440p 50−55 50−55
4K / 2160p 24−27 27−30
low / 720p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 80−85 85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
low / 768p 45−50 50−55
QHD / 1440p 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 230−240 240−250
ultra / 1080p 210−220 220−230
QHD / 1440p 150−160 150−160
4K / 2160p 100−110 100−110
high / 768p 220−230 220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
low / 768p 70−75 60−65
medium / 1080p 50−55 55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500 XT in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon RX 590.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 110−120 110−120
Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 590 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 55−60 55−60
QHD / 1440p 35−40 40−45
4K / 2160p 20−22 21−24
low / 720p 95−100 95−100
medium / 1080p 60−65 65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Far Cry 5 is 3% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
high / 1080p 85−90 85−90
ultra / 1080p 65−70 65−70
QHD / 1440p 40−45 40−45
4K / 2160p 21−24 27−30
low / 720p 210−220 210−220
medium / 1080p 140−150 140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Fortnite is 1% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
high / 1080p 80−85 80−85
ultra / 1080p 60−65 60−65
QHD / 1440p 45−50 45−50
4K / 2160p 30−35 30−35
low / 720p 130−140 130−140
medium / 1080p 85−90 85−90
Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 590 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p 160−170 150−160
medium / 768p 140−150 140−150
high / 1080p 90−95 90−95
ultra / 1080p 45−50 45−50
QHD / 1440p 35−40 35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500 XT in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Radeon RX 590.
high / 1080p 35−40 35−40
ultra / 1080p 27−30 30−33
QHD / 1440p 21−24 21−24
4K / 2160p 12−14 12−14
low / 720p 85−90 90−95
medium / 1080p 45−50 45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Metro Exodus is 2% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
low / 768p 120−130 130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
high / 1080p 70−75
ultra / 1080p 50−55 14−16
4K / 2160p 18−20
low / 720p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 75−80 18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500 XT in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Radeon RX 590.
high / 1080p 30−35 35−40
ultra / 1080p 21−24 21−24
QHD / 1440p 14−16 16−18
4K / 2160p 9−10 10−12
low / 720p 85−90 90−95
medium / 1080p 50−55 50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 590 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 5500 XT.
low / 768p 170−180 170−180
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
high / 1080p 65−70 65−70
ultra / 1080p 35−40 35−40
4K / 2160p 24−27 24−27
Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 590 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p 120−130 90−95
medium / 768p 120−130 60−65
ultra / 1080p 60−65
high / 768p 100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5500 XT in World of Tanks is 62% more, than Radeon RX 590.

Full Specs

  Radeon RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 590
Architecture RDNA 1.0 Polaris
Code name Navi 14 Polaris 30
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 12 December 2019 15 November 2018
Pipelines 1408 2304
Core clock speed 1469 MHz
Boost Clock 1845 MHz 1545 MHz
Transistor count 6,400 million 5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Texture fill rate 162. 4 222.5
Length 180 mm 241 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 224.0 GB/s 256.0 GB/s
Shared memory
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_0)
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
FreeSync +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon R9 390X
  • Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon R9 390X
  • Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon R9 390X
  • Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon R9 390X
  • Radeon RX 5500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q 6 GB
  • Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon Pro W5500
  • Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q 6 GB
  • Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon Pro W5500

Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon RX 590

Availability

MSRP in USD: $169

MSI Gaming Radeon RX 5500 XT Boost Clock: 1845 MHz 128-bit 8GB GDDR6 DP/HDMI Dual Torx 3. 0 Fans Crossfire Freesync VR Ready Graphics Card (RX 5500 XT Gaming X 8G)

Buy on Amazon

$499

In Stock


1607 1685 MHz

Base Clock

Updated 21 minutes agoVisionTek Radeon RX 5500 XT Graphic Card — 4GB GDDR6-1.61 GHz Core, 128 bit Bus Width, DisplayPort, HDMI, DVI (901315)

Buy on Amazon

$439

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 21 minutes ago

Availability

MSRP in USD: $279

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Radeon RX 590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 5500 XT is 392 days newer than Radeon RX 590.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 590

VALORANT

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Desktop • Dec 12th, 2019


FPS

260

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1. 92/FPS

100%

Price, $

$499

100%

FPS and Value Winner

MSI Gaming Radeon RX 5500 XT Boost Clock: 1845 MHz 128-bit 8GB GDDR6 DP/HDMI Dual Torx 3.0 Fans Crossfire Freesync VR Ready Graphics Card (RX 5500 XT Gaming X 8G)

Buy for $499 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 21 minutes ago

Radeon RX 590

Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018


FPS

244

93%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Desktop • Dec 12th, 2019

Radeon RX 590

Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018

356

FPS

341

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

581

FPS

553

FPS

League of Legends

260

FPS

244

FPS

VALORANT

136

FPS

137

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

145

FPS

147

FPS

Fortnite

Theoretical Performance

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Desktop • Dec 12th, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

59. 04 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

162.4 GTexel/s

73%

Radeon RX 590

Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018


Pixel Fillrate

49.44 GPixel/s

81%

Texel Fillrate

222.5 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 590

Dec 12th, 2019

Release Date Nov 15th, 2018
Navi Generation Polaris

$169

MSRP $279
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin Power Connectors 1x 8-pin

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

4 GB Memory

8 GB

GDDR6 Type GDDR5
128-bit Bus 256-bit
224 GB/s Bandwidth

256 GB/s

1607 MHz

Base Clock Speed 1469 MHz

1845 MHz

Boost Clock Speed 1545 MHz
1750 MHz Memory Clock Speed

2000 MHz

Builds Using Radeon RX 5500 XT or Radeon RX 590

VALORANT, 1080p, High

iBUYPOWER Gaming PC

213 FPS

$2. 82/FPS

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, 240 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$599.99

In Stock

Updated 13 minutes ago

iBuypower MR Trace 4 Gaming Desktop PC

213 FPS

$4.69/FPS

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$999

In Stock

Updated 12 minutes ago

iBuypower MR Trace 4 Gaming Desktop PC

213 FPS

$5.07/FPS

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,079.99

In Stock

Updated 13 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Gamer Supreme Liquid Cool Gaming Desktop PC

229 FPS

$14.84/FPS

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Ryzen 7 3700X

16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$3,399

In Stock

Updated 10 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

GeForce RTX 3050

$319.99

Radeon RX 590

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

$1,294.9

Radeon RX 590

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

$329.99

Radeon RX 590

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 6600

$249.99

Radeon RX 5500 XT

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

$506.99

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Radeon RX 6600

$249.99

Radeon RX 590

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3060

$399.99

Radeon RX 590

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 6700 XT

$419.99

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Radeon RX 6950 XT

$999.99

Radeon RX 590

N/A Stock

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 590


Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

Buy on Amazon


vs

AMD Radeon RX 590

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1545 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 175 Watt
  • Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 819 vs 812
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 12.353
  • Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 4904 vs 4729














Launch date 12 Dec 2019 vs 15 November 2018
Core clock speed 1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz
Boost clock speed 1845 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt vs 175 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
PassMark — G2D Mark 819 vs 812
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.328 vs 12.353
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3722 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3367 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3722 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3367 vs 3359
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 4904 vs 4729

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590

  • Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 162.4 GTexel/s
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 9659 vs 9190
  • Around 26% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 52086 vs 41385
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 137.469 vs 128.135
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 2024.814
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 125.474
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 vs 742.778
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 11075
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 11075











Texture fill rate 222.48 GTexel/s vs 162.4 GTexel/s
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
PassMark — G3D Mark 9659 vs 9190
Geekbench — OpenCL 52086 vs 41385
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 137.469 vs 128.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2083.862 vs 2024.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 139.477 vs 125.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 762.142 vs 742.778
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13383 vs 11075
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13383 vs 11075

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
















PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

128.135

137.469

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

2024.814

2083.862

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

13. 328

12.353

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

125.474

139.477

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

742.778

762. 142

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

GPU 1
GPU 2


















Name AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 590
PassMark — G3D Mark 9190 9659
PassMark — G2D Mark 819 812
Geekbench — OpenCL 41385 52086
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 128.135 137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2024.814 2083.862
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.328 12.353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 125.474 139.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 742.778 762.142
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11075 13383
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3722 3716
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3367 3359
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11075 13383
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3722 3716
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3367 3359
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 4904 4729

Compare specifications (specs)









































AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 590
Architecture RDNA 1. 0 GCN 4.0
Code name Navi 14 Polaris 30
Launch date 12 Dec 2019 15 November 2018
Launch price (MSRP) $169 $279
Place in performance rating 165 145
Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop
Design

Radeon RX 500 Series
Boost clock speed 1845 MHz 1545 MHz
Compute units 22 36
Core clock speed 1607 MHz 1469 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 324. 7 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.196 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408
Pixel fill rate 59.04 GPixel/s 49.54 GP/s
Texture fill rate 162.4 GTexel/s 222.48 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 175 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 5,700 million
Floating-point performance

7. 1 TFLOPs
Render output units

32
Stream Processors

2304
Texture Units

144
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support

Dual-link DVI support

HDMI

VGA

Interface PCIe 4. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 7.09 inches (180 mm) 241 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4. 6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 256 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 8000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
4K h364 Decode
4K h364 Encode
h365/HEVC Decode
h365/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support

RX 5500 XT vs RX 590 ⚙️

Argon2d-dynW/W

Argon2d-ninja0KH/s110W0KH/W

Astralhash12. 517MH/s86W0.146MH/W

Autolykos246.414MH/s71W0.654MH/W

BCD8.295MH/s115W0.072MH/W

BMW512630.421MH/s116W5.435MH/W

BeamHashII14.1H/s92W0.153H/W

BeamHashIII13.155H/s84W0.157H/W

Blake (2b)1.198GH/s118W0.01GH/W

Blake (2s)2.628GH/s112W0.023GH/W

Blake (2s-Kadena)0.461GH/sWGH/W

C119.647MH/s120W0.08MH/W

CNReverseWaltz741. 45H/s90W8.238H/W

Chukwa47.238KH/s114W0.414KH/W

Chukwa215.464KH/s108W0.143KH/W

Circcash921.018KH/sWKH/W

CryptoNightConceal1288.5H/sWH/W

CryptoNightFastH/sWH/W

CryptoNightFastV2H/sWH/W

CryptoNightGPU250.17H/sWH/W

CryptoNightHavenH/sWH/W

CryptoNightHeavyH/sWH/W

CryptoNightHeavyX291. 85H/sWH/W

CryptoNightLiteV71.325KH/sWKH/W

CryptoNightR578.8H/sWH/W

CryptoNightSaberH/sWH/W

CryptoNightStelliteV4H/sWH/W

CryptoNightTurtle4.96KH/sWKH/W

CryptoNightUPX2KH/sWKH/W

CryptoNightV8KH/sWKH/W

Cuckaroo29S2.49H/s115W0.022H/W

Cuckaroo29b2.49H/s103W0.024H/W

CuckooBFC42. 77H/sWH/W

CuckooCycle1.99H/sWH/W

Dedal7.387MH/s89W0.083MH/W

Eaglesong0.439GH/s105W0.004GH/W

Equihash(125,4)18.43H/s119W0.155H/W

Equihash(144,5)31.47H/s111W0.284H/W

Equihash(192,7)18.1H/s116W0.156H/W

Equihash(210,9)116.61H/s92W1.268H/W

Equihash(96,5)H/sWH/W

Equihash+Scrypt5.756KH/sWKH/W

Etchash30. 683MH/s94W0.326MH/W

Ethash30.683MH/s94W0.326MH/W

Globalhash10.231MH/s94W0.109MH/W

HMQ17254.647MH/s132W0.035MH/W

Handshake0.117GH/sWGH/W

HeavyHash91.994MH/s106W0.868MH/W

Hex6.242MH/s95W0.066MH/W

HoneyComb15.416MH/s77W0.2MH/W

Jeonghash3.936MH/s89W0.044MH/W

KAWPOW11.54MH/s70W0.165MH/W

KangarooTwelve0. 8GH/s130W0.006GH/W

Lyra2REv235.435MH/s130W0.273MH/W

Lyra2REv330.521MH/s86W0.355MH/W

Lyra2vc0ban35.629MH/s130W0.274MH/W

Lyra2z25.361MH/sWMH/W

Octopus9.763MH/s62W0.157MH/W

PHI161211.835MH/s104W0.114MH/W

PHI2MH/sWMH/W

Padihash6.282MH/s104W0.06MH/W

Pawelhash4.606MH/s104W0.044MH/W

Phi52. 498H/s88W0.028H/W

ProgPowH/sWH/W

ProgPowSERO9.645MH/s128W0.075MH/W

ProgPowZ9.48MH/s129W0.073MH/W

RandomKEVAMH/sWMH/W

RandomSFXMH/sWMH/W

RandomXMH/sWMH/W

SHA-256csm919.3MH/s129W7.126MH/W

Skein2297.43MH/s129W2.306MH/W

Skunkhash22.977MH/s99W0.232MH/W

SonoA1.179MH/s123W0. 01MH/W

TimeTravel1019.59MH/s110W0.178MH/W

Tribus42.217MH/s113W0.374MH/W

Ubqhash24.82MH/s114W0.218MH/W

Verthash0.339MH/s77W0.004MH/W

VerusHash0.236MH/s66W0.004MH/W

X11k1.526MH/s106W0.014MH/W

X16R7.099MH/s118W0.06MH/W

X16RT7.082MH/s111W0.064MH/W

X16RTVEIL7.091MH/s101W0.07MH/W

X16Rv27.477MH/s125W0. 06MH/W

X16S7.09MH/s105W0.068MH/W

X177.108MH/s108W0.066MH/W

X17R6.812MH/s119W0.057MH/W

X185.638MH/s101W0.056MH/W

X21S4.622MH/s97W0.048MH/W

X22i1.723MH/s89W0.019MH/W

X25X0.851MH/s61W0.014MH/W

Xevan2.463MH/s94W0.026MH/W

Zhash31.86H/s127W0.251H/W

cuckARood292.76H/s60W0.046H/W

cuckARoom290. 63H/s65W0.01H/W

cuckAToo310.26H/s68W0.004H/W

cuckAToo320.1H/s63W0.002H/W

vProgPow3.659MH/s100W0.037MH/W

0022 59 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s

  • 45W below TDP?
    130W vs 175W
  • 6000MHz higher effective clock speed?
    14000MHz vs 8000MHz
  • 300MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1845MHz vs 1545MHz
  • 700million more transistors?
    6400 million vs 5700 million
  • 8°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
    73°C vs 81°C
  • 5nm smaller semiconductors?
    7nm vs 12nm
    • 1.92 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
      7. 12 TFLOPS vs 5.2 TFLOPS
    • 250MHz faster memory speed?
      2000MHz vs 1750MHz
    • 60.12 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
      222.48 GTexels/s vs 162.36 GTexels/s
    • 32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
      256GB/s vs 224GB/s
    • 128bit wider memory bus?
      256bit vs 128bit
    • 896 more stream processors?
      2304 vs 1408
    • 56 more texture units (TMUs)?
      144 vs 88
    • 3°C lower GPU idle temperature?
      30°C vs 33°C

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 580

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 580

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    VS

    NVIDIA GTX 1660 TI

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 9000

    VS

    MSI RADEN RADEN0003

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    vs

    Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 TI

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    VS

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT XT XT XT XT XTAI VS0261 10. 0 /10

    1 Reviews of users

    Functions

    Price and quality ratio

    10.0 /10

    1 votes

    10.0 /10

    1 votes

    9000 10

    1 Votes

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    003

    Fan noise

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Reliability

    10.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 votes

    Performance

    1.GPU clock speed

    1607MHz

    1469MHz

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.Turbo GPU

    1845MHz

    1545MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3. pixel rate

    59 GPixel/s

    49.54 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    5.2 TFLOPS

    7.12 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    162.36 GTexels/s

    222.48 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1750MHz

    2000MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    14000MHz

    8000MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    224GB/s

    256GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4. memory bus width

    128bit

    256bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 590

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 590

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple displays. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5.GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 590

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 590

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 590

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 590)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 590

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI 3.Version

    HDMI 2.0

    HDMI 2.0

    New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price match

    Cancel

    Which graphic cards are better?

    Video card Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon RX590. Compare?

    Video card

    Author Alexey Bodrov Reading 4 min. Views 104 Posted
    Updated

    Good day to all, in today’s test we will compare the top video card of the previous line from AMD RX 590 with the junior card of its new line RX 5500 XT. If you look at the prices, they are about the same if you take into account the 8 GB version.

    For comparison, versions from Gigabyte were taken.

    Contents

    1. Appearance and
      construction
    2. Performance
    3. Game tests
    RX 590 RX5500XT
    Length 232 mm 225 mm
    Width 2 slots 2 slots
    Power connector 8pin 8pin
    Fans 2 2
    • 9007

      Design in
      black with orange accents could be seen in both the RX 580 and
      earlier models. The length is only 232 mm. The card can be easily
      fit into small cases where there is no room for large video cards.

      In terms of cooling, everything is the same as with previous cards, a massive heatsink with
      One direct contact heat pipe helps to remove heat from the hot chip. At
      This video card chip is very hot and can peak at 82 degrees. Medium
      temperature at maximum continuous load is kept within 75-78
      degrees, which may not be very positive for a long distance. Important
      understand that problems are possible with a constant load on the video card around the clock,
      when playing 5-6 hours a day, nothing will happen to the video card.

      Now consider the RX 5500 XT, its black laconic and strict design is good
      suitable for any build. They are also slightly shorter than their «competitor», her
      length is only 225 mm. The video card is not equipped with a backlight, which is rather
      all for the best, since the backlighting would be knocked out of the strict design of the card.

      The card has excellent cooling, two fans, a massive heatsink with two
      heat pipes that have direct contact with the graphics chip. The chip itself
      cold and reaches a maximum temperature of 68 degrees, the average
      temperature around 64-65 degrees. These are excellent figures for
      performance of this card.

      RX 590 RX5500XT
      DVI-D one
      HDMI one one
      display port 3 3

      RX 590 has 3 DisplayPort
      and 1 HDMI like the RX 5500 XT, but DVI-D is also available.

      RX 590 RX5500XT
      Memory size 8 GB 8 GB
      Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
      Core frequency 1560 MHz 1845 MHz
      Memory frequency 8000 MHz 14000 MHz
      Memory interface 256 bit 192 bit
      stream processors 2304 1408

      The technical characteristics of video cards are the same only in terms of volume
      random access memory. In all other respects they are completely different. Frequencies
      the RX 5500 XT has more graphics core and memory, and the bus width and the number of
      RX 59 has more streaming processes0. Let’s see in tests how it affects
      FPS in games.

      Let’s see how our cards perform in games and how big between
      them a difference. All tests are carried out on top-end hardware with maximum
      graphics settings.

      Battlefield V RX 590 RX5500XT Difference
      FPS Min. Avg. Min. Avg.
      1080p 95 103 88 95 7.77%
      2k (2560×1440) 70 78 64 72 7.69%

      Battlefield V is perfectly optimized for AMD graphics cards. The game is not
      the newest, but graphically demanding enough, both cards show themselves
      Great. At Full HD resolution, video cards keep FPS almost at the mark
      100 frames per second. The difference in performance does not exceed 7%

      Destiny 2 RX 590 RX5500XT Difference
      FPS Min. Avg. Min. Avg.
      1080p 100 109 92 101 7.34%
      2k (2560×1440) 88 94 77 85 9.57%

      Destiny 2 MMO shooter that gained its second wave of popularity after the transition
      games on Steam. Both in 1080p and 2k FPS on both cards is excellent without
      any sagging.

      world war z RX 590 RX5500XT Difference
      FPS Min. Avg. Min. Avg.
      1080p 97 102 83 92 9.80%
      2k (2560×1440) 68 75 59 68 9.33%

      World War Z is a game in the heat of a cooperative shooter, with action elements and
      third person survival horror. Dynamic and brutal. Difference in
      performance between cards is a little less than 10%, but the RX 5500 XT cannot be called
      «lagging behind» it shows excellent results.

      Gears of War 5 RX 590 RX5500XT Difference
      FPS Min. Avg. Min. Avg.
      1080p 53 60 48 54 10. 00%
      2k (2560×1440) 39 44 36 40 9.09%

      Gears of War 5 The fifth part of the dynamic shooter. RX 590 keeps average FPS in
      around 60 frames, RX 5500 XT is slightly inferior, but it will not achieve 60 frames
      problem by slightly lowering a couple of graphics settings.

      Metro Exodus RX 590 RX5500XT Difference
      FPS Min. Avg. Min. Avg.
      1080p 34 42 31 38 9.52%
      2k (2560×1440) 27 32 23 29 9.38%

      Probably the most demanding game in our test today. AT
      2k resolution, both cards have drawdowns below 30 FPS, which will be noticeable in
      dynamic scenes. In 1080p everything is great and there are no such drawdowns, gameplay
      smooth and comfortable.

      From the tests it can be concluded that the RX 590 is still a decent
      graphics card showing all its capabilities in games. Lots of new stuff coming
      on this map with max settings of 60 fps.

      RX 5500 XT is an excellent representative of the budget segment, copes with
      many games, at 1080p the card shows all its capabilities.
      The cold chip and quiet cooling system are its big pluses.

      AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT video card review: the pain of choice / Graphics cards

      AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT graphics card review: …

      The most interesting news


      The market for sub-$200 accelerators, which is still dominated by cheaper models from 2016, has finally stirred up. Users can now choose between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon RX 5500 XT. But did it get any better? One thing is clear — it has not become easier. The test involves SAPPHIRE and PowerColor video cards with 4 and 8 GB of RAM

      ⇣ Table of Contents

      ⇡#

      General Computing

      Unlike GCN, which AMD planned to make into a general-purpose architecture that is equally well suited for gaming and non-graphics computing, RDNA was originally designed with a focus on 3D rendering. The tasks of the GP-GPU in it are performed according to the residual principle, and AMD itself has directly stated that the driver for Navi chips is still optimized exclusively for games.

      However, both versions of the Radeon RX 5500 XT showed encouraging results in several production applications. So, the new products surpassed the performance of the Radeon RX 590 in the Adobe Premiere Pro video editor, which is traditionally unfavorable for AMD accelerators, and reached the highest positions in the Blender Cycles tile renderer. But there are also directly opposite examples — such as the synthetic ray tracing benchmark LuxMark. As for the comparison with NVIDIA products that are in the same price range with the Radeon RX 5500 XT, it seems that the unconditional hegemony of the «red» video chips in GP-GPU tasks has come to an end. Now much more depends on the specifics of each application and how the computational load it creates falls on the architecture of a particular manufacturer.

      ⇡#

      Video Encode/Decode

      The Radeon RX 5700 (XT) and the new RX 5500 XT are nearly equivalent in performance to the integrated H.264, HEVC and VP9 video decoder. Both GPUs in the Navi family are capable of playing HEVC and VP9 recordings at resolutions up to 8K at 42 FPS. However, only in the speed of working with H.264 material in 4K can AMD products oppose something to NVIDIA Turing chips. However, the performance margin of the decoder, which clearly exceeds the needs of a home theater, is only useful for fast conversion or scaling of recordings, and for this, owners of the Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 5700 (XT) will need a powerful CPU, and here’s why.

      The premiere of the Radeon RX 5700 (XT) was accompanied by an extremely raw driver that did not allow the use of the built-in hardware HEVC encoder, and H.264 encoding occurred at a reduced speed. The release of devices based on the next Navi chip gave us a good reason to return to this issue, and for good reason. Now both Navi 10 and Navi 14 are finally able to record the video stream in HEVC, but the performance is comparable, at best, to what the NVENC encoder is capable of in the original version of the GeForce GTX 1650, which NVIDIA copied from the Volta chip. The rest of the Turings, including the GTX 1650 SUPER, have much faster HEVC write speeds and support 8K resolution in addition.

      Also, while the latest Radeon driver restored the functionality of the HEVC encoder, the H.264 encoder, on the contrary, broke. The frame rate at 1080p even increased, and Navi 14 was faster than Navi 10, but at 4K, the ffmpeg package simply cannot complete the work on both chips. However, there is still a possibility that the reason is the individual incompatibility of the API of the «red» accelerators and the ffmpeg libraries, but the GCN architecture chips pass these tests without any difficulties.

      ⇡#

      Gaming Test Results, Energy Efficiency and Pricing

      Now that we have all the performance and power consumption data for the Radeon RX 5500 XT, it’s a shame not to compare the new chip to older AMD products in terms of FPS per watt and unit area. The energy efficiency ratings given by the chip maker hit the bull’s-eye: the 8 GB version of the RX 5500 XT really outperforms the Radeon RX 580 and RX 590 by 61% and 65%, respectively, and the performance in terms of chip size increased by 41-55% due to advanced 7nm FinFET process technology.

      But even though the Navi 14 die is smaller than the Polaris 10/20/30, and thanks to the new architecture and high clock speeds of the Radeon RX 5500 XT, the same number of shader ALUs are not required to beat the Radeon RX 580 games, the RDNA circuit design requirements for transistor budget in this case turned out to be no less than that of GCN. However, this is partly due to the fact that AMD does not use fully functional Navi 14 silicon in the Radeon RX 5500 XT. In addition, the fewer shader ALUs on the die, the greater the share of the overall control logic and uncore blocks (external interface controllers, video codecs, and etc.), which scale poorly and in the Navi 10 and Navi 14 chips for the most part should be the same.

      Manufacturer AMD NVIDIA
      Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB) Radeon RX 580 (8 GB) Radeon RX 590 (8 GB) GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB, 9 Gb/s) GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
      GPU Navi 14 Polaris 20XT Polaris 30XT GP106 TU116 TU116 TU106
      Microarchitecture RDNA GCN 4th generation GCN 4th generation Pascal Turing Turing Turing
      Process technology, nm 7nm FinFET 14 nm FinFET 14 nm FinFET 16 nm FinFET 12 nm FFN 12 nm FFN 12 nm FFN
      Number of transistors, million 6400 5 700 5 700 4400 6600 6600 6600
      Chip area, sq. mm 158 221 221 200 284 284 284
      Average power consumption (Crysis 3), W 137 199 224 120 95 107 107
      Capacity/W 100% −38% −39% +4% +39% +37% +56%
      Productivity/million transistors 100% +1% +11% +32% −7% +4% +18%
      Capacity/sq. mm 100% −36% −29% −28% −46% -40% −32%
      Capacity/W (reverse comparison) 100% +61% +65% −3% −28% −27% −36%
      Performance/million transistors (reverse comparison) 100% -1% -10% −24% +7% −4% −15%
      Capacity/sq. mm (reverse comparison) 100% +55% +41% +40% +87% +68% +48%

      But against the background of the competitor’s proposals, everything is not so rosy. The only thing that Navi 14 managed to achieve was to catch up and overtake Pascal in terms of performance per watt and, of course, per square millimeter of area. Compared to the closest member of the Turing family, the TU116, NVIDIA retained a huge power efficiency advantage, starting at 37% on the GeForce GTX 1660 and rising to 56% on the GTX 1660 SUPER. But looking at the Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT, you might think that AMD is already close to parity with NVIDIA in the energy efficiency of graphics processors — the older Navi has only 20% left to gain at most 20% compared to direct competitors.

      However, in this case, the calculations are far from scientific accuracy, because all devices based on the TU116, except for the GTX 1660 Ti, are also equipped with cut-down GPUs, and the 1660 SUPER, in addition, significantly outperforms the Radeon RX 5500 XT in terms of RAM bandwidth. We would be careful not to give a final assessment of Navi 14 silicon, but, whatever one may say, in practice, all the proportions from the table are completely fair and do not honor the new AMD product.

      1920 × 1080
      FSAA AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (4 GB) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB) AMD Radeon RX 570 (4 GB) AMD Radeon RX 580 (8 GB) AMD Radeon RX 590 (8 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (9Gb/s, 6GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (4 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (6 GB)
      Assassin’s Creed Odyssey TAA High 26 / 33 35 / 41 26 / 29 32 / 37 35 / 39 38 / 42 25 / 30 36 / 42 43 / 49 43 / 51
      Battlefield V TAA High 35 / 66 72 / 87 64 / 76 71 / 83 76 / 91 65 / 80 36 / 56 69 / 88 76 / 93 97 / 107
      Borderlands 3 TAA 37 / 42 44 / 48 29 / 34 33 / 38 37 / 43 32 / 37 24 / 28 33 / 38 39 / 44 42 / 49
      DiRT Rally 2. 0 MSAA 4x + TAA 44 / 56 43 / 56 32 / 39 37 / 46 42 / 51 32 / 48 25 / 38 32 / 47 40 / 58 45 / 65
      Far Cry 5 TAA 75 / 84 75 / 84 54 / 60 62 / 69 71 / 78 67 / 73 50 / 56 72 / 81 74 / 82 83 / 95
      Forza Horizon 4 MSAA 4x + FXAA 35 / 49 59 / 70 44 / 52 52 / 63 57 / 69 53 / 62 41 / 50 60 / 71 65 / 78 73 / 87
      Metro Exodus TAA 14 / 27 15 / 28 12 / 22 14 / 24 16 / 27 14 / 25 11 / 18 16 / 25 17 / 28 19 / 32
      Red Dead Redemption 2 TAA High ID 21 / 25 ID 17 / 22 20 / 24 16 / 19 14 / 18 19 / 24 21 / 25 23 / 28
      Shadow of the Tomb Raider SMAA 4x 25 / 35 32 / 41 23 / 33 29 / 39 32 / 43 31 / 39 25 / 30 37 / 45 38 / 48 44 / 55
      Strange Brigade AA Ultra 65 / 90 64 / 89 59 / 78 65 / 89 71 / 96 64 / 81 52 / 64 76 / 94 77 / 97 89 / 116
      Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 TAA Ultra 33 / 44 39 / 49 20 / 37 37 / 46 43 / 52 33 / 40 21 / 27 40 / 48 43 / 52 47 / 58
      Total War: THREE KINGDOMS TAA 17 / 23 17 / 25 14 / 18 18 / 24 19 / 26 21 / 27 13 / 17 18 / 23 23 / 29 27 / 35
      Max. +43% +15% +29% +41% +27% +2% +45% +59% +78%
      Avg. +14% −13% +3% +13% +3% −24% +10% +22% +39%
      Min. -1% −30% −18% −9% -14% −39% −16% −2% +13%

      Approx. To line up the two versions of the Radeon RX 5500 XT and other budget graphics cards at retail prices, we had to use different sources. The pricing for the RX 5500 XT is what AMD recommends and will hopefully be true. We took the rest from market.yandex.ru.

      ⇡#

      Pins

      AMD finally has an adequate replacement for accelerators based on the older Polaris series chips, which have earned the well-deserved love of thrifty gamers (and greedy miners), but, to be honest, have been asking for retirement for a long time. The Radeon RX 5500 XT offers performance on par with the Radeon RX 580 or RX 590 and the same amount of RAM, but at the same time, the RDNA architecture and 7nm process technology allowed AMD to drastically cut power consumption, and the company’s partners to start producing simple and cheap devices that can easily cope with Navi 14.9 chip cooling0003

      However, if we take for comparison with the Radeon RX 5500 XT not the obviously outdated Polaris, but the new GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, the characteristics of which NVIDIA specially tweaked to spoil the debut of AMD’s budget card, then the choice between the two accelerators will not be easy at all. In terms of GPU performance, they are almost equivalent: as always, there are clearly “red” and clearly “green” games, but Navi 14 managed to bring the average advantage over the cut-down TU116 to 2% FPS. In terms of performance per watt, on the contrary, NVIDIA is in the lead, and this time the Navi chip lagged behind its direct competitor much more than the Navi 10 on the RX 5700 (XT) boards from the older Turings. However, one should not overestimate the importance of energy efficiency when it comes to accelerators with a power of 95–130 W. Both versions of the Radeon RX 5500 XT we tested — SAPPHIRE Pulse and PowerColor Red Dragon — are extremely cool and very quiet, despite their relatively high heat dissipation.

      A completely different issue is on the agenda — the amount of RAM. If the requirements of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with difficulty, but squeezed into 4 GB, then the new Navi 14, due to the specifics of the architecture or driver, is absolutely not enough. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, with the same amount of RAM as the Radeon RX 5500 XT, came out 10% FPS ahead in the total score in 12 games, and in individual cases the outcome was much worse for the new AMD. Of course, if you give both accelerators an indulgence and reset the graphics quality settings, then the situation will improve, and the younger version of the Radeon RX 5500 XT will even start to work out a slightly higher retail price. But we are not only talking about games in which budget video cards are kept on the verge of a frame rate of 30 FPS. Many modern demanding projects Navi 14 pulls even at maximum speeds, and sometimes with a comfortable frame rate beyond 60 FPS. You just need to take off the cement shoes 4 GB of RAM.

      It’s too early for NVIDIA fans to gloat. It seems that RDNA chips really do not manage the limited amount of local memory as efficiently as Turing, but algorithm optimization is also not omnipotent. Game developers are already focusing on video cards with 6 GB of memory or more, and why on the threshold of 2020 should GPUs have enough RAM as in 2016? Sooner or later, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER will suffer the same fate, and then the miser will pay twice. “Knows who,” AMD fans will add.

      It turns out that the only worthy candidate for a purchase in the budget sector is the 8-gigabyte modification of the Radeon RX 5500 XT? Ah, if only everything were so simple! The fact is that AMD priced it at $ 199 or 14,999 rubles, and from here it’s already a stone’s throw to the simplest variants of the GeForce GTX 1660. So you’re thinking, why not give up on this budget sector of yours and take something more powerful right away? But if money is tight, and the soul does not lie with the old Radeon RX 580/590 or GeForce GTX 1060, then personally we don’t see a fundamental difference between the 4 GB RX 5500 XT and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — in practice, much more will depend not on chip, but from the binding and cooling of specific implementations of one or another video card.

      ← Previous page


      ⇣ Contents

      • Page 1 — Navi 14 GPU. Specifications, prices. Test video cards
      • Page 2 — Testing methodology. Clock speeds, power consumption, temperature, noise level and overclocking. 3DMark gaming benchmarks (1920×1080)
      • Page 3 — Overclocking performance
        • § 3DMark: Overclocking
        • § Gaming tests (1920×1080): overclocking
      • Page 4 — General purpose calculations. Video encoding/decoding. Results tables. conclusions

      If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER.

      Related Content

      Permanent URL: https://3dnews.ru/999597/obzor-amd-radeon-rx-5500-xt/page-1.html

      Tags:
      graphics card, amd, radeon rx 5500 xt, sapphire, powercolor

      ⇣ Comments

      Review and test ASUS ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition 8 GB — i2HARD

      Vitaly Kolmykov

      March 31, 2020

      Energy efficient 7nm graphics card from AMD. The ASUS ROG series traditionally attracts increased attention — let’s see what the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition from ASUS is capable of.

      For quite a long time, in the initial «gaming» segment of video cards, AMD offered solutions based on Polaris chips, which are in fact the top solutions of past generations with the corresponding level of heat dissipation and power consumption. The Radeon 5500 XT will offer a similar level of performance to the RX 590, but with much less appetite and power supply requirements, the 7nm process solves all the backlog.

      Specifications

      Radeon RX 5500 XT
      GPU Navi 14 XTX
      Shader ALUs 1408
      Boost core frequency 845 MHz
      texture blocks 88
      ROP blocks 32
      Memory size 8 GB
      Memory type GDDR6
      Memory frequency 14 GHz
      Memory bus 128 Bit
      PCI Express 4. 0x8

      Support for the new PCIe 4.0 standard is noteworthy, doubling the bandwidth of the interface lines is a definite plus, but the lines have also become two times smaller. PCIe 4.0 support on the motherboard side is now available only on new AMD products. Will it turn out that without a new interface, the card will lose performance? I hasten to reassure — testing on systems with different versions of the interface did not reveal significant differences.

      Appearance and packaging

      The ROG STRIX series from ASUS is the subject of much attention from enthusiasts. The Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition will be in your hands in a luxurious colorful box.

      Learning how to pack isn’t the most exciting thing to do, but ASUS’ decision to replace the foam with a tricky cardboard-and-film transformer certainly arouses curiosity.

      ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT received a new cooling shroud design for the STRIX series — it looks serious. Plastic, although it does not scream about its premium quality, but it looks soundly.

      The fresh design of the axial-tech fans, with the blade edges united in a circle, not only looks memorable, but should also provide more efficient airflow.

      The cooling system occupies three slots, under the casing there is a two-section radiator, five heat pipes are in charge of heat transfer. For the declared energy consumption, the design is clearly made with a large margin, which should have a positive effect on acoustic comfort and temperature conditions.

      The back side of the card is covered with a backplate. The logo and name of the series are not illuminated, which is new for the STRIX series. The video card is just over 28 cm long, so it will be possible to place it in most cases without difficulty.

      Several elements are compactly located in the backplate cutout: an 8-pin additional power connector with a connection indicator light, a backlight off button, and a BIOS version switch.

      Initially, the two BIOS options are labeled as P — Performance (maximum performance option) and Q — Quiet (lower fan speeds will provide less noise at the cost of a small performance loss).

      Signal output can be done via one HDMI 2.0b and three DisplayPort 1.4.

      The ROG series logo on the end of the card is responsible for the backlight, the color and mode of operation can be configured by ASUS AURA. The restraint of illumination on the video card will definitely find its fans, but ASUS has already accustomed us to the festival of colors on each STRIX product.

      Testing

      The following system was used as a test bench:

      • CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K 5 GHz
      • Motherboard: Asus Maximus XI Apex
      • RAM: G.Skill Trident Z 2×8 GB (F4-3600C15D-16GTZ) 4400 MHz CL17
      • SSD: NVMe WD Black SN700 500 GB (Windows 10 Pro with all updates)
      • SSD: SATA Crucial MX500 1TB (gaming)
      • Power Supply: Cooler Master V1200 Platinum 1200 W

      GPU-Z confirms all the declared characteristics, on the Intel PCIe platform it is available only in version 3. 0.

      The operating parameters of the video card are perfectly demonstrated by the ten-minute Fire Strike Ultra stress test.

      The frequency is kept very close to the declared maximum, the average power consumption of the chip is just over 115 watts. The average fan speed is 1330 rpm, which is in a quiet range for an impeller with a diameter of less than 100 mm, and for a high-quality fan of this size, it is almost silent. Compared to other PC components, the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT cooling system is absolutely indistinguishable during the stress test. The temperature regime is expectedly excellent — 64 ° maximum.

      Let’s get down to the games, each diagram of the final FPS values ​​is accompanied by a recording of one of the test runs with full monitoring of all system parameters.

      Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

      • Resolution: 1080p
      • Graphics Quality: Highest
      • Built-in test

        Far Cry 5

        • Resolution: 1080p
        • Graphic quality: maximum
        • Built-in test

          Tom Clancy’s The Division 2

          • Resolution: 1080p
          • Graphic quality: maximum
          • Built-in test

            Wolfenstein: Youngblood

            • Resolution: 1080p
            • Graphics Quality: Uber
            • Built-in test

            In all games except Metro Exodus, the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT delivers excellent FullHD performance at or near maximum settings.

            Acceleration

            As a starting point in the study of overclocking potential, I will take the result in the Fire Strike Ultra benchmark from the 3DMark package.

            The result of the video card without overclocking is 3519 points.

            The average value of the chip frequency during the passage of a long segment is 1832 MHz, the average power consumption over the same period is 111 W. To change the frequencies of the chip and memory, we will use the capabilities of the driver in the performance settings tab.

            For a chip voltage value of 1150 mV, the stable value of the maximum boost turned out to be at around 2000 MHz, let’s expand the power limit by a maximum of 20%, which, most likely, is even redundant.
            The memory was able to work stably at the maximum available in the driver 1860 MHz or 14880 MHz effective.

            Run the Fire Strike Ultra stress test with the new settings.

            The average chip frequency is kept at around 1950 MHz, which is more than 100 MHz more than the factory setting. At the same time, the average chip consumption increased slightly — up to 127 W, there is still a power limit reserve — you can try your luck at a higher voltage. The cooling will definitely do the trick, 62° on average with the fans still running quietly.

            Let’s evaluate the increase in performance in the Fire Strike Ultra benchmark.

            3744 points, a little more than 6% increase, not much, but overclocking did not affect temperatures or acoustic comfort.

            Conclusion

            With the ROG STRIX Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Edition, you can feel the desire of ASUS to reduce the final cost of the card, but not to lose in the efficiency of the solution. As a result, we got a card not only with excellent overclocking potential, a powerful cooling system, but also with a price that does not stand out against the background of direct competitors represented by cards from other AMD partners.

            Benefits:

            • Low chip temperatures even when overclocked
            • Silent cooling system
            • Strict design
            • High overclocking potential

            Might not suit:

            • Oversized graphics card
            • Poorly equipped with RGB lighting
            • High price version with 8 GB memory

            Review and test of the Intel Core i5-9600k processor: 6-core for overclocking!

            What can the 6-core Intel Core i5-9600k offer for overclockers, and to what frequency can this processor be overclocked on a mid-range motherboard? Answers to these and other questions in the material of the I2HARD. ru editorial board.

            Overview and testing of the be quiet! System Power 9 500W

            All models of power supplies from the well-known German manufacturer be quiet!, including the System Power line, designed for users with a limited budget, have been in our editorial office. At the beginning…

            Review and test of the power supply Cougar VTE 600W

            In our editorial office, several power supplies of different models manufactured by Cougar have already been tested. Not so long ago, budget representatives of the STE and STX series were considered, now it has come up …

            SAPPHIRE NITRO + RX 5500 XT SE

            SAPPHIRE NITRO + RX 5500 XT SE

            The SAPPHIRE website uses cookies to improve the user experience

            Visit Privacy for information on how to disable cookies.

            I agree

            • NITRO RX 6000 Series
            • NITRO RX 5000 Series
            • NITRO RX 500 Series
            • Previous generation

            Open all NITRO

            • Introduction
            • Game applications
            • Features
            • SAPPHIRE
            • VIDEO CARDS FEATURES

            • Components
            • Radeon
            • Adrenalin
            • TriXX
            • Specification
            SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5500 XT Special Edition

            The SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5500 XT Special Edition graphics card delivers the ultimate in 1080p PC gaming experience. The NITRO+ RX 5500 XT features renowned SAPPHIRE high quality components such as our efficient 95mm fans and an improved cooling shroud for the incredible performance and stability every gamer needs. Signature additional features include easy-to-swap fans with Quick Connect technology that work with Intelligent Fan Control and Dual-X Fan Cooling for efficient heat dissipation with low noise and high reliability. Incredibly aesthetic ARGB fan and shroud illumination enhance the look of your gaming PC with customization in our TriXX software. Use our new TriXX Boost feature to boost the performance of your favorite games to take first place among your friends while you play. Get a NITRO boost with the SAPPHIRE NITRO + RX 5500 XT Special Edition!

            IMMERSION WITH GAME DYNAMICS

            HD games

            • Forza Horizon 4
            • Gears of War 5
            • The Outer Worlds
            • Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
            • Ghost Recon Breakpoint
            • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

            HD Games

            CHANGE THE RULES

            Accurate Game Graphics

            to 1845 MHz Frequency Boost

            14.

            4 Gbps effective

            7nm FinFET

            ARGB backlight & ARGB fan

            Cooling Dual-X

            Fan Quick Connect

            SAPPHIRE VIDEO CARDS FEATURES

            Discover all the incredible features of the SAPPHIRE NITRO RX 5500 XT Special Edition! We have divided our features into 3 categories so you can see at a glance all the features we are proud to provide the best gaming experience for you

            Cooling Dual-X

            Boost frequency Up to 1845 MHz
            Game frequency Up to 1737 MHz

            An innovative combination of efficient VRM cooling and individual memory coolers work in tandem to effectively dissipate heat in all sections

            Our 95mm fan blades are streamlined for more airflow and superior heatsink coverage with less noise than standard cooling system designs.

            Sapphire’s signature Dual-X cooling features two oversized, quiet fans and a state-of-the-art heatsink.

            Learn More

            Specification

            • #SKU#: 11295-05-20G SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5500XT 8G GDDR6 Special Edition
            GPU

            Radeon™ RX 5500
            2nd generation 7nm process technology
            RDNA architecture

            GPU Clock
            • Boost Clock Up to 1845MHz
            • Game frequency Up to 1737 MHz

            Game Clock is the expected GPU clock when running typical gaming applications, set to typical TGP(Total Graphics Power). Actual individual game clock results may vary.

            Stream Processors

            1408

            Memory size/bus

            8GB/128-bit GDDR6

            Memory frequency

            14. 4 Gbps effective

            Displays

            Max 4 displays

            Approval

            HDMI™: 4096×[email protected]
            DisplayPort 1.4: 5120×[email protected]

            Interface

            PCI-Express 4.0

            Outputs
            • 2x HDMI
            • 2x DisplayPort
            BIOS support
            • Dual UEFI
            API
            • Vulkan®
            • OpenGL® 4.6
            • OpenCL 2.0
            • DirectX® 12
            • Shader Model 6.4
            Game Resolution

            Extreme gaming settings in 1080p

            SAPPHIRE Technology
            • Sapphire TriXX Support
            • TriXX Boost
            • BIOS software switch
            • Max Boost
            • Power Design
            • ARGB LED light for logo and fans
            • Addressable ARGB fan lighting
            • NITRO Glow
            • ARGB sound visualization
            • Fan Check
            • Free Flow
            • Support for VR devices
            • Intelligent Fan Control
            • Precision fan control
            • Efficient cooling VRM
            • Efficient video memory cooling
            • Cooling Dual-X
            • Backplate (Metal reinforcement plate)
            • Double ball bearings
            • Fan Quick Connect
            • Fuse protection
            • Dual BIOS
            Technology
            • RDNA Architecture
            • Second generation 7 nm process technology
            • GDDR6 memory
            • Power Efficiency
            • PCI Express 4. 0 support
            • Video Streaming up to 8K
            • Display Port 1.4 (HBR3) / DSC
            • Radeon™ Software
            • Radeon™ Boost
            • Radeon™ Image Sharpening
            • Radeon™ Anti-Lag
            • AMD FidelityFx
            • Async Compute
            • Radeon™ Rays Audio + True Audio Next
            • Radeon™ FreeSync™ 2 HDR
            • Radeon™ VR Ready Premium
            Cooling
            • Dual-X Cooling
            • 2 fans
            • Double ball bearings
            Form factor

            2.2 slots, ATX

            Dimensions: 257x 132.8 x 44.2 mm

            Power consumption
            • 135 W
            OS

            Requires 64-bit OS

            Linux®, Windows® 10, Windows® 7

            System Requirements
          • 1 x 8-pin power cable.
          • PCI Express® based PC with one X16 graphics slot on the motherboard.
          • The minimum amount of system memory is 4GB. 8GB recommended.
          • Specifications provided here are for guidance only. Please check with your regional distributor or dealer for latest specifications.
          • Colors of PCB or other components may differ from those illustrated.
          • SAPPHIRE reserves the right to update or revise specifications without prior notice.
          • All trademarks and logos are acknowledged as the property of their respective holders.

          *The terms HDMI, HDMI High-Definition Multimedia Interface, and the HDMI Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of HDMI Licensing Administrator, Inc.

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6950 XT PURE Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          OC BIOS Up to 2435MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 18 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6950 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2324MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 18 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6900 XT SE Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2365MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6900 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2285MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 XT SE Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2360MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2360 MHz, 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2190MHz 16GB/256-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6750 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2623MHz, 12GB/192-bit DDR6. 18 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6700 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2622MHz, 12GB/192-bit DDR6. 16 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6650 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 8GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2694MHz 8GB/128-bit DDR6. 17.5 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ AMD Radeon™ RX 6600 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 8GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA™ 2

          2607MHz, 8GB/128-bit DDR6. 16Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700XT 8G GDDR6 Special Edition

          2035MHz 8GB/256-bit GDDR6. 14.4 Gb/s

          Learn more

          SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700XT 8G GDDR6

          2010MHz 8GB/256-bit GDDR6. 14 Gb/s

          Join the community

          Big test AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

          • Game tests
          • Should I take it?

          Hello, dear readers of the site Uspei. com. The Radeon RX 5500 XT is a highly anticipated update to popular AMD graphics cards. It should replace the Polaris family, which has undergone a rebranding with overclocking and a change in process technology since 2016.

          Apparently, all the juices from the bearded architecture have already been squeezed out, and AMD has seriously decided in the wake of successful Ryzen releases to offer something new in the most popular price niche for video cards under $200.

          In the meantime, in this segment, the cards of the past and the year before last from nVidia have long and firmly settled down, which itself cannot convince buyers to upgrade.

          AMD’s New GPU Navi 14 based on RDNA architecture, made using 7nm process technology.

          This chip was tasked by AMD with to kill three birds with one stone : to enter the market of notebooks, OEMs and discrete video cards in the 5500M, 5500 and 5500XT versions respectively. These options have on board 22 computing modules, 1408 stream processors and differ only in frequencies and power consumption.

          AMD’s slides emphasize the tiny GPU footprint, power efficiency over the Radeon RX 480, and gaming edge over NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 1650 and 1650 Super. 1650 Super is just what we have, as well as «inconvenient» for AMD RX 590, which the company decided not to remember, but in vain. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

          It was a dubious move to point out the superiority of the 8 GB version over the 4 GB version. Why all of a sudden cards with the same GPUs at the same frequencies can be so different in FPS? And at what FPS, minimum, average, maximum?

          The fact is that the number of PCI-Express lanes in the RX 5500 is not 16, like most cards, but 8. It is not known what this step is connected with, but judging by the test results on the network, there really is a difference.

          But they did not forget to brag about the support of the 4th version of PCI-Express. Well, let’s look at the novelty in action.

          To be tableties ↑

          Tests in games

          We will compare it with the 2018 Polaris model in the person of RX 590 and video cards of a competitor on the budget Turn: GTX 1650, fresh 1650 Super and 1660.

          9000

          in in in in Borderlands 3 RX 5500 XT at first glance shows itself cheerfully, but regular jerks spoil the picture: the worst results of very rare events of all participants. It might be fixed in newer versions of the drivers.

          In the Ghost Recon Breakpoint , jerking also does not allow you to enjoy the smoothness. You can’t write off the lack of video memory: 8 GB should be enough for this game.

          And here is the first win in Call of Duty Modern Warfare : you can’t call it confident, because the RX 590 is on the heels of both the average and the minimum FPS. There are no problems with smoothness this time.

          But in The Division 2 , the novelty could not catch up with Polaris a year ago, winning only a few frames from its rival GTX 1650 Super.

          The difference in the results of the top three in Far Cry New Dawn is so negligible that it can be attributed to measurement error. However, the RX 5500 XT is one frame clear of the GTX 1660 and leads the test.

          Gears 5 the newcomer needed only slightly smoother visuals to win. No special jerks were noticed, but statistics are statistics.

          Metro Exodus , ultra settings, no tessellation and Hairworks. Nothing has changed here: the new drivers from AMD have not eliminated the problems with smoothness, and the leadership is still with the cards from nVidia.

          In Need For Speed ​​Heat the difference between all cards except 1650 must be looked for with a magnifying glass. Not a single video card has problems with smoothness, however, there are no stable 60 FPS either, and a magnifying glass will not help here.

          In Red Dead Redemption 2 , last year’s RX 590 shows itself confidently at medium settings, beating the 5500 XT by 3 frames both in terms of average and minimum FPS.

          In Resident Evil 2 RX 590 is even more ahead of even more expensive rivals from nVidia. And this is on DirectX 11, by the way.

          Star Wars Fallen Order0 managed to outperform the more recent 5500 XT in minimum FPS. And yes, we’ll talk about the price difference a little later.

          And finally, the native element for AMD cards — World War Z . It would seem, where, if not in this game, to show the superiority of the new architecture? But no, again a confident victory for the RX 590, this time over all the participants.

          To the table of contents ↑

          Is it worth taking?

          As for overclocking, we can say that it does not exist. 110 MHz for memory and 85 MHz for the chip is all that can be squeezed out without exceeding the limits set by AMD.

          Undervolt at 100 millivolts seems to work, but does not give boost, it is impossible to check the voltage on the chip in overlay Radeon Software , and MSI Afterburner is not yet able to control and monitor the voltage on the RX 5500 XT. As a result — plus a couple of frames in overclocking for the average FPS, and minus a couple for the minimum.

          If you are not interested in energy efficiency and want hardcore overclocking, it is possible to remove all limits set by AMD with program More Power Tool.

          The guys from the site igorlabs have already experimented with the card, took 2.1 GHz on the chip, increasing the card’s appetite up to 250 watts. There was little sense from this: one or two bonus frames turned into jerks and friezes.

          In general, the video card came out controversial. It definitely did not become a breakthrough, both in terms of performance and energy efficiency. The 130W TDP isn’t as impressive as the 80W in laptops where the 1660 Ti dominates with equal gusto.

          Obviously, there is no point in updating Polaris owners. A low price could have spurred on the purchase of those who are just about to purchase their first PC, but this did not work out either. The recommended price of 170 and $200 for the 4 and 8 GB versions looks unconvincing against the background of widely available cards on Polaris, which are not particularly slow.

          It’s too early to talk about prices, but at the start of sales, the price is significantly overpriced, although it is gradually falling.

          At the same time, the GTX 1650 SUPER is already available for a lot less.

          There are no special complaints about the card itself from ASUS in the version of DUAL EVO . This is not a flagship solution, however, even during overclocking, the chip warmed up to only 60 degrees, the video memory to 64, and the fans worked at 50% at a speed of 1718 rpm.