Radeon RX 5700 vs Radeon RX Vega 56
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- Radeon RX 5700 vs Radeon RX Vega 56
-
Radeon RX 5700
256%
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5700 |
156% higher gaming performance. |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 56 |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (67 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 56 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | Navi 10 (Navi 10 Pro) | vs | Vega 10 (Vega 10 XL) | |
Fab Process | 7 nm | vs | 14 nm | |
Die Size | 254 mm² | vs | 484 mm² | |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 12,500 million | |
Shaders | 2304 | vs | 3584 | |
Compute Units | 36 | vs | 56 | |
Core clock | 1465 MHz | vs | 1156 MHz | |
ROPs | 64 | vs | 64 | |
TMUs | 256 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 56 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | HBM2 | |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 2048 bit | |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
vs | 800 MHz 1600 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 56 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 180 watts | vs | 210 watts | |
Release Date | 7 Jul 2019 | vs | 8 Aug 2017 |
-
Radeon RX 5700
104. 00 GP/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
94.14 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 5700
416.00 GT/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
329.50 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 5700
448.00 GB/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
409.60 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 5700
7480.00 GFLOPs
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
10544.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
74
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
57
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
125
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
108
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
78
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
63
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
117
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
98
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
149
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
94
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
Radeon RX 5700
58
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
46
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
145
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
117
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
123
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
109
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
102
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
96
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
93
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
1
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
113
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
103
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
104
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
84
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 5700
135
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
122
FPS (higher is better)
-
Radeon RX 5700
167
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
139
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
67
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
58
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
42
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
104
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
88
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
66
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
58
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
134
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
129
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
106
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
81
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
131
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
116
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 5700
108
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
90
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
65
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
56
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
56
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
45
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
98
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
82
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
57
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
46
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
89
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
76
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
110
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
75
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
Radeon RX 5700
36
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
30
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
104
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
82
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
98
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
76
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
82
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
65
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
92
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
76
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
73
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
58
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 5700
115
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
81
FPS (higher is better)
-
Radeon RX 5700
116
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
88
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
53
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
45
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
35
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
71
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
61
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
52
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
45
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
87
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
86
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
70
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
54
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
98
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
85
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 5700
74
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
67
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
47
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
40
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
30
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
27
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
54
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
47
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
30
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
51
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
46
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
62
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
48
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
Radeon RX 5700
17
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
15
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
54
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
43
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
55
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
43
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
41
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
34
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
50
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
41
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
35
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
32
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 5700
56
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
43
FPS (higher is better)
-
Radeon RX 5700
61
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
48
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
32
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
29
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
18
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
15
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
41
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
36
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
31
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
29
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
44
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
43
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700
35
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
28
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
60
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
51
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 5700
40
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
39
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700
27
-
Radeon RX Vega 56
23
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
VS | ||
Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon RX 6600 |
VS | ||
Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 2070 Super | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Reddit — Dive into anything
I decided to do an updated price comparison, now that there has been a greater clarification from AMD about their Reference Navi SKUs.
2017 Vega 10 Launch:
RX 5700 XT 50th AE = $499 (-$200) up to +10% versus RX Vega 64 LC Edition = $699
RX 5700XT Ref Blower = $449 (-$50) + 15% versus RX Vega 64 Ref Blower = $499
RX 5700 Ref Blower = $379 (-$20) + 16% verus RX Vega 56 Ref Blower = $399
Every SKU is cheaper than the Vega 10 SKUs and has higher performance. AMD is seeking to disrupt the market as they did with the original Ryzen 1st Gen launch.
RX Vega 56/64 sales were boosted dramatically, by the fact Nvidia drivers performed significantly worse on the AM4 platform then their reported Intel platform FPS performance for most of 2017. That was largely fixed by Nvidia, though you can still find oddities should you be looking for them. But, it was a big scandal at the time and destroyed the credibility of Youtubers and Tech Websites benchmarking Ryzen CPUs with Nvidia GPUs.
FPS On AM4 (Ryzen 1st Gen Platform Vega 10 versus Pascal 1440p:
RX Vega 64 LC Edition = $699 +8% Ref Blower GTX 1080 8GB $500.
Ref Blower Vega 64 = $499 -1% Ref Blower GTX 1080 8GB $500.
Ref Blower RX Vega 56 $399 +10% = Ref Blower GTX 1070 8GB $399.
As all gamers can see, not a single Vega 10 SKU was cheaper than it’s Pascal SKU equivalent at launch: Vega 10 was principally sold on savings of $100 for freesync monitors versus Gsync monitors and Nvidia drivers showing lots of FPS regressions with Ryzen CPUs for most of 2017. Only one SKUs Ref Blower RX Vega 56 was actually faster than its Nvidia price equivalent GTX 1070 8GB.
FPS On Intel Platform Navi versus Turing 1440p:
RX 5700 $379 -0.5% versus Ref RTX 2070 B-Grade $480 100%
RX 5700 $379 9.5% versus Ref RTX 2060 6GB FE A-Grade $349 100%
This is quite simple, the RX 5700 is a RTX 2070 8GB B-grade gaming performance for just $379 e. g. saving of $100!
Moving to RX 5700 XT, this is a little confusing by AMD using this wording at the E3 launch: price performance leader at the $499 price point.
Currently, you can easily buy a factory overclocked B-grade 103% of the performance of the reference RTX 2070 8GB B-grade model for $499 on Amazon.com. However, you can also buy a RTX 2070 8GB FE (A-grade) Factory Overclocked SKUs with $40 rebates bringing the net price down to $520 at Newegg.com (extra hassle of rebate scheme). Therefore, there is a good deal of confusion about which SKU the RX 5700 XT was benchmarked against!
Average Performance Scaling for Turing:
$349 Ref RTX 2060 6GB FE = 100%
$480 RTX 2070 8GB B-grade = 110%
$500 Factory Overclocked RTX 2070 8GB B-grade (120mhz) = 113%
$599 Ref RX 2070 8GB FE A-grade = 114%
$560 (Option of a $40 Rebate) Factory Overclocked RX 2070 8GB FE (150mhz) = 118.5%
$699 Ref RTX 2080 B-grade = 130%
$789 RTX 2080 A-grade = 133%
I think it is the Factory Overclocked RTX 2070 8GB B-grade that runs at 210watts! Simply put, I think the people at AMD Labs would enjoy testing the RX 5700 XT against the most inefficient, but cheapest and most common, RTX 2070 8GB B-grade SKUs.
RX 5700 XT $449 +5.8% versus Factory Overclocked RTX 2070 8GB B-grade (120mhz) $500.
RX 5700 XT $449 +8.8% versus Ref RTX 2070 8GB B-grade $480.
RTX 5700 XT $449 +0.3% Factory Overclocked $520 Rebated RX 2070 8GB FE A-grade (150mhz)
As you can see, those rebates $30 to $40 on Factory Overclocked RTX 2070 8GB priced at $560 does give away that these FE A-grade GPU dies are around a similar perfomance level.
Finally, RX 5700 XT 50th AE, no FPS results for this, you will need to look reviewers and website. It does have +80mhz on clocks. The Radeon VII (on 7nm) scales 3.8% FPS for every 100mhz added to it’s clock speed of 1.8Ghz. Therefore, around 4% seems a safe guess for a GPU with +25% IPC architecture gain, better heat sensitivity and from prime parts of the 7nm silicon wafer.
Unlike the Vega 10 launch, Navi is priced at launch to be a higher performance and frequently with a cheaper price the competitors products.
New Features Info Updates:
FidelityFX is part of AMD’s GPUOpen Program (opensourced) and game developers will be able to use it to enhance the gaming experience for all gamers. Therefore, this AMD’s 2019 gift to all gamers.
Radeon Image Sharpening is a Navi only feature for DX9 and DX12 APIs e.g. it uses a dedicated hardware element on Navi that applies higher Image Quality without ensuring the penalties of rendering natively at 4K.
Anti-lag is supported in DX11 for all AMD GPUs. Hip, hip, hooray say all of the people who have Radeon VIIs and Vega 56s/64s, etc GPUs. Though, Navi will exclusively support it in DX9 as well. Currently, Anti-lag does not work in the DX12 API. Benefits: Esports e.g. up to 35% lower latency for frames in GPU bound situations.
I have created a new Subreddit to focus solely on AMD GPUs called r/RadeonGPUs, please consider subscribing should you find the Posts there helpful or interesting!
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs MSI Radeon RX 5700
comparison
MSI Radeon RX 5700
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
VS
WINNER
MSI Radeon RX 5700
Rating: 36 points
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Rating: 31 points
Performance
Memory
General info
Features
Benchmark tests
Top specifications and features
- Passmark score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
Passmark test score
MSI Radeon RX 5700: 14403
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56: 13341
3DMark Fire Strike Score
MSI Radeon RX 5700: 20587
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56: 16756
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Test Score
MSI Radeon RX 5700: 22914
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56: 20344
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
MSI Radeon RX 5700: 432273
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56: 404564
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
MSI Radeon RX 5700: 128901
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56: 122852
Description
MSI Radeon RX 5700 graphics card is based on Navi / RDNA architecture. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 based on GCN 5.0 architecture. The first has 10300 million transistors. The second is 12500 million. The MSI Radeon RX 5700 has a transistor size of 7 nm, versus 14.
The base clock frequency of the first video card is 1465 MHz versus 1156 MHz for the second.
Let’s move on to memory. MSI Radeon RX 5700 has 8 GB. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has 8 GB installed. The bandwidth of the first video card is 448 Gb / s versus 409.6 Gb / s for the second.
FLOPS for the MSI Radeon RX 5700 is 7.73. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 10.7.
Moves to benchmark tests. In the Passmark benchmark, the MSI Radeon RX 5700 scored 14403 points. But the second card is 13341 points. In 3DMark, the first model scored 22914 points. The second 20344 points.
For interfaces. The first video card is connected using PCIe 4.0 x16. The second is PCIe 3.0 x16. The MSI Radeon RX 5700 graphics card has Directx version 12. OpenGL version 4.6. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 graphics card has Directx version 12. OpenGL version 4.6.
Why MSI Radeon RX 5700 is better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Passmark score 14403 vs 13341 , 8% higher
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score 20587 vs 16756 , up 23%
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score 22914 vs 20344 , up 13%
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU score 432273 vs 404564 , up 7%
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU score 128901 vs 122852 , 5% higher
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score 30841 vs 28504 , 8% higher
- GPU base clock 1465 MHz vs 1156 MHz, 27% higher
- Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s vs 409.6 GB/s, 9% more
Comparison of MSI Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56: highlights0015
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1465MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
1156MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124. 9 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
800MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
7.73TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
10.7TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
RAM
8GB
max 128
Average: 4. 6 GB
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1725MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
1471MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
248.4 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
329.5 GTexels/s
max 756. 8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
NAVI / RDNA
GCN 5.0
Graphic processor name
Navi 10
VEGA 10
memory capacity
is the speed with which the device saves or reads information.
448GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
409.6GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
14000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984. 5 MHz
1600MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show all
6
Mean: 4.9
Mean: 4.9
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
256bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
2048bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
180W
Average value: 160 W
210W
Average value: 160 W
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
7 nm
Average: 34. 7 nm
14 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
10300 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
12500 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed of the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals is provided. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
4
Average: 3
3
Average: 3
Width
270mm
max 421. 7
Average: 192.1mm
280mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
Height
110mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
127mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
2.1
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
Shader model version
6.5
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5. 9
Vulkan version
1.2
1.2
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
2
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2. 2
3
Average: 2.2
Number of HDMI connectors
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
1
Average: 1.1
1
Average: 1.1
Interface
PCIE 4.0 X16 9000
14403
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
13341
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
128901
max 1
Average: 80042. 3
122852
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20587
max 38276
Average: 12463
16756
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
22914
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
20344
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
30841
max 57937
Average: 18799. 9
28504
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
432273
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
404564
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
91
max 202
Average: 64
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
126
max 232
Average: 121.3
max 232
Average: 121. 3
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase
124
max 175
Average: 108.4
max 175
Average: 108.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
41
max 107
Average: 39
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
93
max 180
Average: 132.8
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
eleven
max 21
Average: 10. 7
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
68
max 153
Average: 52.5
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
146
max 189
Average: 91.5
max 189
Average: 91.5
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia
133
max 189
Average: 88.6
138
max 189
Average: 88. 6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05
162
max 316
Average: 189.5
max 316
Average: 189.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max
152
max 269
Average: 169.8
141
max 269
Average: 169.8
FAQ
How does MSI Radeon RX 5700 perform in benchmarks?
In Passmark, the MSI Radeon RX 5700 scored 14403 points. The second video card in Passmark scored 13341 points.
What is the FLOPS of video cards?
FLOPS The MSI Radeon RX 5700 is 7.73 TFLOPS. But the FLOPS of the second video card is 10.7 TFLOPS.
What is the energy consumption?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 180 Watt. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 210 Watt.
How fast are MSI Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 runs at 1465 MHz. In this case, the maximum frequency reaches 1725 MHz. The base clock frequency of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 1156 MHz. In turbo mode it reaches 1471 MHz.
How much memory do graphics cards have?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 supports GDDR6. Installed 8 GB of RAM. The throughput reaches 448 GB/s. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 works with GDDR No data available. The second has 8 GB of RAM. Its bandwidth is 448 GB/s.
How many HDMI connectors do they have?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 has 1 HDMI output. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is equipped with 1 HDMI outputs.
Which power connectors are used?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 uses No data. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is equipped with No HDMI outputs.
What architecture are the graphics cards based on?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 built on Navi / RDNA. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 uses the GCN 5. 0 architecture.
What graphics processor is used?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 is equipped with Navi 10. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has Vega 10 installed. And the PCIe version is 4. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not have these PCIe lanes. PCIe version 4.
How many transistors?
MSI Radeon RX 5700 has 10300 million transistors. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has 12500 million transistors
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
VS
MSI Radeon RX 5700
MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Duke
VS
MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Titanium
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
Asus GeForce GTX 980
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming
VS
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X
AMD Radeon R9 390
VS
AMD Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon RX 6900XT
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Asus GeForce ROG Strix RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC
VS
Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4000
EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 Superclocked Gaming ACX 3. 0
VS
EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti FTW2 w/ iCX Cooling
MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Aero
VS
MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Gaming X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Asus GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Gigabyte R9 Fury X
VS
Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 Fury
AMD Radeon R9 390X
VS
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 580 8GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
MSI GeForce GTX 960
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1670MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
1156MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
800MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
9.61TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
10. 7TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
RAM
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1925MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
1471MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
308 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
329.5 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name 9000
448GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
409.6GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
14000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984. 5 MHz
1600MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show all
6
Mean: 4.9
Mean: 4.9
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
256bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
2048bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
225W
Average value: 160 W
210W
Average value: 160 W
Process
The small size of semiconductors means that this is a new generation chip.
7 nm
Average: 34. 7 nm
14 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
10300 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
12500 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided for an expansion card used to connect a computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
4
Average: 3
3
Average: 3
Width
254mm
max 421. 7
Average: 192.1mm
280mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
Height
135mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
127mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
2.1
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
Shader model version
6.5
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5. 9
Vulkan version
1.2
1.2
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
2
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2. 2
3
Average: 2.2
Number of HDMI connectors
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
1
Average: 1.1
1
Average: 1.1
Interface
PCIE 4.0 X16 9000
16495
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
13341
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
138294
max 1
Average: 80042. 3
122852
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21686
max 38276
Average: 12463
16756
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
24914
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
20344
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
34866
max 57937
Average: 18799. 9
28504
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance Score
65107
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
53494
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
446992
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
404564
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
98
max 202
Average: 64
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
136
max 232
Average: 121. 3
max 232
Average: 121.3
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase
135
max 175
Average: 108.4
max 175
Average: 108.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
45
max 107
Average: 39
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
99
max 180
Average: 132.8
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
12
max 21
Average: 10. 7
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
73
max 153
Average: 52.5
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
163
max 189
Average: 91.5
max 189
Average: 91.5
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia
156
max 189
Average: 88.6
138
max 189
Average: 88.