64 x2 6400: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Benchmarks

IndexThe Test and CPU PerformanceGPU PerformanceFinal Words

The Benchmarks

We ran all of our tests on the following system configurations:

Test Setup
CPU	Core 2 Duo E6550 (2. 33GHz 4MB 1333FSB) Core 2 Duo E4500 (2.2GHz 2MB 800FSB) Core 2 Duo E4400 (2.0GHz 2MB 800FSB) Pentium E2160 (1.8GHz 1MB 800FSB) Pentium E2140 (1.6GHz 1MB 800FSB) AMD Athlon X2 5000+ (2.6GHz 2x512K) AMD Athlon X2 4800+ (2.5GHz 2x512K) AMD Athlon X2 4200+ (2.2GHz 2x512K) AMD Athlon X2 4000+ (2.1GHz 2x512K)
Motherboard	Intel: ASUS P5K-V G33 AMD: Biostar TF-7050M2
Video Cards	AMD Radeon HD 2900 XT AMD Radeon HD 2600 XT AMD Radeon HD 2600 Pro AMD Radeon HD 2400 XT NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Video Drivers	AMD: Catalyst 7.10 NVIDIA: 163.69
Hard Drive	Seagate 7200.9 300GB 8MB 7200RPM
RAM	2x1GB Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400 4-4-4-12
Operating System	Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit

We’ll start off with a look at CPU performance. For these tests we ran at 1024 x 768 to minimize any GPU bottlenecks and highlight differences between CPUs.

CPU Performance

Our first benchmark is of an indoor map with a reasonable sized firefight taking place. The frame rates are high due to the indoor environment but the explosions and computer interaction keep our CPUs busy doing more than just feeding data to the GPU.

Intel continues to hold onto the overall performance crown as AMD has nothing faster than the Athlon 64 X2 6400+, but the race is a bit closer at lower price points.

The limited production 6400+, albeit more expensive than Intel’s Core 2 Duo E6750, ends up underperforming its closest competitor. The Core 2 Duo E6550 is about 5% faster than the Athlon 64 X2 6000+, but honestly the performance advantage isn’t large enough to really matter, especially in more realistic GPU-bound scenarios.

The Core 2 Duo E4000 series ends up losing a bit of ground to AMD thanks to having a smaller L2 cache and slower FSB, both of which Episode 2 is particularly sensitive to. The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is 12% faster than its price-competitor, the Core 2 Duo E4500. It’s interesting to note the impact of L2 cache size on performance even in the AMD camp; the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ only has a 512KB L2 per core (vs. 1MB of the 5600+) and performance drops significantly, to the point where it’s a toss up between the 5000+ and the Core 2 E4400.

At the low end of the spectrum, Half Life 2’s dependency on very fast memory accesses and large cache sizes really penalize the Pentium Dual-Core processors, both of which are bested by their AMD rivals. AMD’s margin of victory isn’t tremendous but it’s clear that Intel’s lack of an on-die memory controller does hinder gaming performance of these small-cache parts.

Look at real world performance however, even the difference between an Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and a Pentium E2160 will be largely masked by GPU limitations at higher resolutions.

Our next benchmark takes place in the outland_03 level, in a small indoor environment resulting in ridiculously high frame rates for all of the CPUs. The performance comparison in this benchmark is almost purely academic, simply highlighting differences between microprocessors as even the cheapest CPUs in this comparison pull over 170 fps in this test.

Half Life 2 Episode 2 continues to be very sensitive to FSB frequency, which is part of the reason why we see the dual core E6750 (1333MHz FSB) pull ahead of the quad core Q6700 (1066MHz FSB). There’s slight overhead associated with running HL2 on a quad-core system, which doesn’t make for a better situation, not to mention that the game doesn’t take advantage of more than two threads. Quad-core owners won’t really be plagued by lower performance than their dual core compatriots, but they simply don’t get any benefit out of the latest version of Valve’s Source engine.
The standings remain relatively unchanged, once more we see that L2 cache size and latency strongly impact performance. The 90nm Athlon 64 X2 5600+ features a 1MB L2 cache per core with a slightly lower access latency than the 65nm Athlon 65 X2 5000+, with its 512KB L2 per core, the resulting performance difference is significant; the 5600+ holds onto a 20% performance advantage over the 5000+, despite only a 7. 6% increase in clock speed.

Intel’s Core 2 lineup gets hurt even worse as you look at the 800MHz FSB/2MB L2 E4000 parts. The E4500 is seriously outperformed by the 5600+ and ends up being equal to the 5000+, despite the latter being priced lower.

The Pentium Dual-Core processors pull up the rear once more, thanks to even lower clock speeds and meager 1MB L2 caches shared between two cores.

Our final performance test takes place in the outland_10 map, an outdoor environment where we spend most of our time driving around (poorly) and avoiding the topography of the level.

The standings remain unchanged: Intel holds the overall performance crown, the two are competitive at $150 — $200 price points, and AMD manages to pull ahead in the sub $150 market.

Index
GPU Performance
IndexThe Test and CPU PerformanceGPU PerformanceFinal Words

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

Specs AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+ processor 3.

2 GHz 2 MB L2 Box Processors (ADX6400CZBOX)

This is a demo of a seamless insert of an Icecat LIVE product data-sheet in your website. Imagine that this responsive data-sheet is included in the product page of your webshop. How to integrate Icecat LIVE JavaScript.

Warranty:
3 years

Long product name AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+ processor 3.2 GHz 2 MB L2 Box
:

The short editorial description of AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+ processor 3.2 GHz 2 MB L2 Box

ATHLON 64 X2 6400+ 3. 2GHZ CACHE 2X1MB FSB1000

More>>>

Short summary description AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+ processor 3.2 GHz 2 MB L2 Box:

This short summary of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+ processor 3.2 GHz 2 MB L2 Box data-sheet is auto-generated and uses the product title and the first six key specs.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+, AMD Athlon X2, Socket AM2, AMD, 3.2 GHz, 2 MB, L2

Long summary description AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+ processor 3.2 GHz 2 MB L2 Box:

This is an auto-generated long summary of AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+ processor 3. 2 GHz 2 MB L2 Box based on the first three specs of the first five spec groups.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 6400+. Processor family: AMD Athlon X2, Processor socket: Socket AM2, Processor manufacturer: AMD

Report mistake

EN Access to this product is restricted. Please contact your account manager at Icecat.

Specs

Reviews

Specs

No information available on Specs

Login or signup for Full Icecat
to access all product specs

Reviews

AMD Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 X2 processors for Socket AM2

Exploring the latest «white spots» in the history of processors

interesting models from a research point of view, however, the reality turned out to be a little more favorable to us — we managed to get four more Athlon 64s. And they fill in the gaps of previous tests very well, so today we will deal with them. Having also included the Sempron 3200+ from the first article, but without arranging cross-platform competitions. The reason is simple and clear: there is no one to compare with. As we have already seen from above, the entire Athlon 64 X2 family (with the possible exception of the top-end 6400+) «overlaps» such processors as the A4-3400 or even the specific and niche Celeron G530T, but it is difficult for the middle class to resist the Celeron G460. But how things are in the middle and lower class there (or rather, they were) inside — just curious to see. What are we going to do.

Let’s start with single-core models. As you can see, we still lack Sempron 3400+ to be completely happy: it has the same frequency as Sempron 3200+ and Athlon 64 3000+, but 256K bytes of cache memory. Those. if we could find such a model, we would get a full line of L2 (128/256/512) for single-core models at the same frequency. But what we managed to get, we succeeded. On the other hand, Athlon 64 actually appeared among the tested ones, and two at once, so it will be possible to estimate the increase relative to the clock frequency. 2/2 2/2 2/2 CASH L1, I/D, KB 128/128 128/128 128/128 Cache L2, KB 2 × 512 2 × 512 2 × 1024 RAM 2 × DDR2-800 2 × DDR2-800 2 × DDR2-800

There will be three processors in the list of dual-core models, two of which have the same name — alas, but such are the costs of the «old» naming systems by frequency or performance rating: doublets, triplets and Moreover, then they poured like from a cornucopia. Moreover, 4200+ (as well as 3800+, 4600+, 5000+… continue on your own) were lucky to some extent — the «namesake» had the same frequencies and L2 capacitance. Why did couples form at all? First Athlon 64 X2 used 90 nm Windsor crystal, and then switched to 65 nm Brisbane. It turned out such a kind of mess, grown in another sub-line. The fact is that Windsor could have both 1 MiB of cache memory and 2 MiB (512K / 1024K per core, respectively), and Brisbane — only the smaller of these values. As a result, Athlon 64 X2 4000+/4400+/4800+ and beyond were completely different. For example, 90 nm 4400+ (also a participant in our testing) is 2.2 GHz and 2×1024 L2, and 65 nm 4400+ is 2.3 GHz and 2×512. The confusion was aggravated by the fact that the massive Windsor were as usual (TDP 89W), and energy efficient (TDP 65 W), and Brisbane — only the second. In general, AMD’s assortment included three mass Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and another embedded processor with the same name (in fact, the same AM2, the same Brisbane, but 35 W)! How could they be distinguished? Only by marking, and complete — the beginning was similar, i. e. ADO4200 — two processors: you also need to read the «tail» for clarity.

In general, this is a digression into history in order to remind those who like to whine about the good old days and the incomprehensibility of current processor numbers about how everything really was then 🙂 As for the topic of testing, this trio of Athlon 64 X2 will allow us look for answers to three questions at once. The first two are obvious: the usefulness of the increased cache memory (canonical 4200+ versus 4400+) and the performance ratio of the two microarchitectures. The third «pops up» if you look closely at the performance characteristics: 4200+ on Windsor is exactly two Athlon 64 3500+ in one socket. Accordingly, the benefit (or lack of it) from the second core will be seen very well, and without the «disturbing» effect of the shared cache memory or different cache capacities.

94

92

	System board	RAM
AM2	ASUS M3A78-T (790GX)	8 GB DDR2 (2 × 800; 5-5-5-18; Unganged)	4 As we wrote earlier, there are some subtleties with the support of RAM by processors under AM2. Single-core models are officially limited to DDR2-667, but in practice they have nothing against setting the frequency to 800 MHz. This is a positive point, but there is also a negative one — divisors can only be integer, so «true» 800 are obtained only in processors whose frequency is completely divisible by 400. In all other cases, everything is somewhat worse — for processors with a frequency of 1.8 GHz, the real the memory mode is generally DDR2-720, and at 2.2 GHz we get DDR2-732. It is clear that given the weakness (from the point of view of modernity) of the nuclei themselves (or even the nucleoli :)) this does not play a special role, but it is worth remembering this behavior of the “oldies”. Testing Traditionally, we divide all tests into a number of groups, and show the average result for a group of tests/applications on the diagrams (details on the testing methodology can be found in a separate article). The results on the diagrams are given in points, the performance of the iXBT. com reference test system of the 2011 sample is taken as 100 points. It is based on the AMD Athlon II X4 620 processor, but the amount of memory (8 GB) and the video card (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 1280 MB by Palit) are standard for all tests of the “main line” and can only be changed as part of special studies. Those who are interested in more detailed information are again traditionally invited to download a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel format, in which all the results are shown both in converted into points and in «natural» form. Interactive work in 3D packages We were torn in doubt for a long time — these are single- or two-threaded tests, so complete certainty in the question is extremely pleasant processors without a shared cache. And the latter is important here — as we can see, Athlon is faster than the equal frequency Sempron by as much as 20%, and a further increase in L2 also adds almost 10%. At first glance, this seems insignificant against the background of the gain from increasing the clock frequency, but do not forget that the 3000+ and 3500+ share as much as 400 MHz. Accordingly, the question arises — how did AMD plan to compensate for the decrease in cache memory capacity in the Athlon 64 X2 4400+ on Brisbane by increasing the frequency by only 100 MHz, if this chip, other things being equal, is also slightly slower than Windsor? However, drawing conclusions on the first group of tests is, of course, somewhat reckless, so let’s wait. Final rendering of 3D scenes Despite the dramatically changed load pattern, Brisbane is still slightly slower than Windsor, other things being equal. But this is not more interesting, but the almost linear scalability of applications across cores. Even super-linear, which is also quite understandable — a single-core processor has one core for everything, everything, everything, and not just application program threads, but two or more can already “find” additional resources for service processes with less damage to the main work. Although, for obvious reasons, the absolute performance of the old guys is far from impressive: the Celeron G465 (modern, with Hyper-Threading, but physically single-core and low-frequency), for example, scores 35 points in this group of tests, i. e. at the level of Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and only 10% less than 4200+. Packing and unpacking The increase from multi-core is only 20%, although only two cores can use two out of four tests. But the disadvantage of Athlon from the point of view of these programs is the lack of a shared cache, so there is nothing surprising. Even if its number is doubled, the 4400+ overtakes the 3500+ by 1.3 times, and the similar ratio for dual- and single-core Celerons is 1.47. Detailed comments are unnecessary: ​​Pentium D was even worse in terms of practical implementation, but the example of Athlon 64 X2 also clearly shows the viciousness of the way of creating multi-core processors by mechanically combining several cores in one package. Of course, this is better than nothing, but worse than the original multi-core design as in the same Phenom or, at least, Core Duo, which has recently become the de facto standard in the industry. Audio encoding Linear scalability and cache immunity — we’ve known this before. So another loss to Brisbane was relatively new. It’s already becoming monotonous 🙂 Compilation Scalability is almost linear, since cache memory is already important here, but you can trace how important it is. Just do not forget about its exclusive architecture. With this in mind, we see that the transition from 192 KB (total) Sempron 3200+ to 640 KB Athlon 64 3000+ gives almost 30% performance increase. But its further increase from 640 to 1152 KB adds 10% — to some extent, it is also close to linear scalability. Mathematical and engineering calculations A pair of flows is useful here too, albeit to a lesser extent than in the previous two groups. Its value is even higher than that of cache memory or clock speed. But there is nothing new in this, of course. Raster graphics And here a couple of cores are in demand by most applications, albeit not to the full extent. But, by the way, there is little benefit from the cache — to the great joy of those who once bought Sempron. Now, however, neither they, nor Athlon 64, nor even Athlon 64 X2 as such can be used only without fish: 62 points is not only a 65 nm Athlon 64 X2 4200+, but also… a single-core Celeron G440. On average, of course, ACDSee batch tests are performed noticeably faster by any Athlon 64 X2, however, such image processing is striking, but, unfortunately, an exception to the rule. Other RAW converters, where at the “development” stage you can parallelize the work by simultaneously processing several photos, will behave similarly. But after developing, there usually comes a stage of retouching and other things — usually much longer. With all the consequences. Especially for fans of everything alternative — if Photoshop is able to partially use multithreading, then GIMP is not yet trained in this at all. Vector graphics At first glance, these two programs are the same, but this is not entirely true — the main problem with Athlon 64 X2 is the lack of a single cache memory, which reduces the effect of the second core almost to zero. And even lower — Brisbane here turned out to be even worse than the equal-frequency Orleans. Video encoding Again close to linear scalability, as well as weak dependence on the cache capacity. Everything would be fine, of course… If we compare processors only with each other, and not with modern models, but this is exactly what we are doing today. Fortunately for the old people, who are certainly not very suitable for this kind of work, even if they got it for free. Office software But, in principle, you can work with such programs. Not, of course, because the «old» processors are so fast, but because the new ones have not gone too far from them, since most modern technologies are not used by applications of this class. However, some progress in single-threaded performance has also been observed over the past years, so even the Celeron G465 outperforms the Athlon 64 X2 4400+ by 25%. On the one hand, it seems, and nothing critical. On the other hand . .. why endure, albeit minor, but inconveniences? Java The gain from dual core is almost linear. But in terms of JVM demands on cache memory, we finally found the threshold above which you can not “twitch”: from 192 KB to 640 KB, almost 15%, but from 640 to 1152 KB, only 3%. At SBDC, we observed the latter, and in general, most modern processors behave in a similar way — in particular, multi-core Athlon IIs are no worse than Phenom IIs similar in frequency and number of cores, but they are modern for that: either there is L3 or L2 is large (from 512K onwards) capacity. But it turned out to be useful to test the “oldies” at least in order to once again make sure that not all dependencies can be extended indefinitely in any direction — there are thresholds that change everything dramatically. Especially when it comes to cache memory, which is either enough (and then a further increase gives almost nothing), or not enough (and then everything slows down very sharply). Games As we already mentioned, running modern games on single-core processors is not for the faint of heart. However, you can get some result, you can also enjoy an almost linear increase from the second computing core, but then the thought stops 🙂 Suffice it to recall that the fastest dual-core processor, namely the Pentium G2120, scores 119 points, and the fastest quad-core Athlon II X4 651 reaches 121 points. Above, of course, there are all sorts of Phenom II, FX and Core, but we are now more interested in budget models, since the main characters are too old processors. The video card used on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 is certainly overkill for both of these CPU groups, so we get a clean comparison. It is already difficult to get a big increase above — the result of the Core i7-3770K is 159points. But below — almost a twofold difference between modern processors for «about $ 100» and «oldies», i.e. out of about 150% gap between i7-3770K and Athlon 64 X2 4200+, the first 100% falls on the gap between the latter and modern state employees. Let’s repeat, this is even when using a video card, which practically never coexists with any Athlon in real computers. Conclusion? Repeatedly already voiced: when focusing on the gaming use of a computer, the main funds should be spent on a video card. Secondly, the video card. And in the third — she is. And the processor is much less important. Naturally, this should not be a middle-class model from six years ago and definitely not a budget processor of that time, but from modern devices, you can get by with an inexpensive one. It is possible, of course, and expensive, if finances are “not too tight”, but only after the appropriate video card is purchased. But before buying a new expensive video card for an old computer, you need to think three times — it is possible that you should upgrade the platform first. There is nothing new, of course, in this, but once again it is always nice to be convinced of the validity of common truths 🙂 Multitasking environment Running this experimental test on Sempron (and single-core Athlon 64s), as already mentioned, belongs to the area of ​​stress testing, since its single run takes several hours, but here the difference between games and «regular» applications. Simple — if in interactive low performance is a sentence to the system, then in other things … Well, it works slowly — so what? With the task, for some time, it copes in the end. Even if, in the literal sense of the word, the computer is “overloaded” with several tasks of this kind, they are unlikely to be solved one at a time. Something else is more interesting: as we can see, we are not talking about linear scalability here (unlike some other tests): Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (“correct”, i.e. 90 nm) is about 1.5 times faster than the Athlon 64 3500+. At the time of the announcement of the AM2 platform, the selling prices of these two models were equal to 359 and 184 dollars, respectively, and a considerable number of X2 buyers at that time chose them “for the future”: in the expectation that in a couple of years the single-core processor would definitely need to be changed for something, but the dual core will still work. Is it possible to consider this as accomplished at least now — the disputes do not subside 🙂 But even this is not interesting, but the fact that as a result of the price wars unleashed in the same 2006, the required couple of years did not pass, when Athlon 64 X2 became much cheaper. In particular, since July 2007, the «66-point» 6000+ began to be shipped at $178. Simple arithmetic: 184 + 178-359= 3 dollars that such a slightly extended upgrade would cost without changing the board and with the assumption that 3500+ would not find its buyer after it, instead of buying 4200+ at the start. Of course, hardly anyone could have imagined just such a development of events (and in general: If I were as smart before as my Sarah after (c) ), but lovers of «promising» platforms and processors should remember that there was also such a historical experience. Total We assessed how Athlon 64 X2 compares with modern processors last time, and we figured it out with Sempron the year before last, why today it was decided to move away from «far» comparisons, simply filling in the gaps in knowledge about processors for Socket AM2. From this point of view, let’s look at the subjects. Sempron and single-core Athlon 64 are actually very similar. It is noticeable, of course, that the large capacity of the cache memory gives the latter a lot, however, in fact, Athlon with different L2 differ from each other no less noticeably. According to the diagram, it seems that more, but we should not forget that we could not find Sempron 3400+, but it would most likely fit into the gap between Sempron 3200+ and Athlon 64 3000+ in a way similar to Athlon 64 X2 4200 + and 4400+. In general, the differences between single-core families are artificial: the second one started a little higher than the first ended. Sempron 3600+ and Athlon 64 3000+ can be considered the only point of intersection: a higher frequency, even at 256K L2, may well allow the first processor to overtake the second one sometimes. But, by the way, pay attention to how different ratings are needed for this: 3600+ and 3000+. Although for both processors they indicate performance according to AMD, however grenades of a clearly different system 😉 What always poured water on the mill of adherents of the version, that in fact the rating does not indicate at all some objective (albeit hypothetical) performance compared to the reference Athlon on some set of applications, but the frequency of comparable performance Intel processors. Only different — Celeron and Pentium 4, respectively. Due to the prescription of years, and the change of the AMD processor marking system to, to put it mildly, more convenient and logical (more precisely, there are already several new, more convenient and logical ones), naturally, there is no point in seriously dealing with this issue today, but since we have in our a kind of digression into history, why not remember this very story once again? 🙂 The rating of the Athlon 64 X2 is essentially a control shot in the forehead of the official version. It is clear that mass software did not immediately become at least two-threaded, but in the future, other scenarios for the development of events were not initially traced. And what have we come to? 500 points Athlon 64 gives a 1.19 times increase in the final score of our method, and 300 points between families — 1.2 times (if we compare Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Athlon 64 3500+). But the next 400 points are already inside the Athlon 64 X2 — only 1. 07 times! In general, judging performance by the rating of different families is a completely thankless task, although it was officially introduced for this. However, the ratings of Athlon 64 X2 cannot even be compared with the clock frequency of Intel processors — there was no Pentium D with official frequencies of 4 GHz and higher. But the Pentium 4 didn’t have those either. Comparison of two variants of Athlon 64 X2, i.e. Brisbane and Windsor are also interesting only from a historical point of view, but echoes the present. Yes, and with ratings too — as we can see, the processor on a newer chip lags so steadily behind its predecessor of equal performance characteristics that the 65 nm Athlon 64 X2 4200+ should have a frequency of at least 100 MHz higher, i.e. 2.3 GHz. Alas, such a Brisbane was called Athlon 64 X2 4400+, with which he definitely had nothing to do. It is clear that the problem could be solved by a more competent distribution of ratings, but without them it could not have been created at all. Why does it resonate with modernity? Brisbane is cheaper to manufacture than Windsor and somewhat more economical — a direct analogy to Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge. But there are also serious differences: with equal performance characteristics, Ivy is still faster than Sandy, firstly, and secondly, such processors are called differently. In general, scolding Intel for too little gain from the development of the 22 nm process technology, it is worth remembering that there have been worse cases in history. This concludes the archival topic — at least until the new version of the testing methodology is put into operation. Next in line is the final version of the processor results, since there is enough material compared to the intermediate one: almost as much as was in the last one. It remains only to study the performance of the new AMD processors for Socket AM3+, which we will do in the next article. Thank you Corsair , Palit 93-8
9	Calculate	square root of 12
10	Calculate	square root of 20
11	Calculate	square root of 50
18	Calculate	square root of 45
19	Calculate	square root of 32
20	Calculate	square root of 18

Explanation of Kingston®

Memory Part Numbers

Search Kingston. com

To get started, click accept below to bring up the cookies management panel. Next, tap or click on the Personalization button to turn on the chat feature, then Save.

Your web browser version is out of date. Please update your browser to improve your experience on this website. https://browser-update.org/update-browser.html

Learn how to read Kingston® memory part numbers, including Kingston FURY™, Server Premier™ ValueRAM®, HyperX®, DDR5, DDR4, DDR3, DDR2, and DDR memory product lines. This will help you identify memory modules by specification.

Article number: KF556C38BBE2AK2-32

• KF
• 5
• 56
• C
• 38
• B
• B
• E
• 2
• A
• K2
• —
• 16

KF = Product line

• KF – Kingston FURY

5 = Technology

• 5 — DDR5

56 = speed(MT/s ^{Article number: KVR48U40BS8LK2-32X}

• KVR
• 48
• U
• 40B
• S
• 8
• L
• K2
• —
• 32
• X

KVR = Kingston ValueRAM

• KVR – Kingston ValueRAM

48 = speed (MT/s ^{Article number: KF432C16BB1AK4/64}

• KF
• 4
• 32
• C
• 16
• B
• B
• 1
• A
• K4
• /
• 64

KF = product range

• KF — Kingston FURY

4 = Technology

• 3 — DDR3
• 4 — DDR4

32 = speed (MT/s ^{Article number: HX429C15PB3AK4/32}

• HX
• 4
• 29
• C
• 15
• P
• B
• 3
• A
• K4
• /
• 32

HX =

product line

• HX — HyperX (legacy modules)

4 = technology

• 3 — DDR3
• 4 — DDR4

29 = speed (MT/s ^* )

• 13 — 1333
• 16 — 1600
• 18 — 1866
• 21 — 2133
• 24 — 2400
• 26 — 2666
• 28 — 2800
• 29 — 2933
• 30 — 3000
• 32 — 3200
• 33 — 3333
• 34 — 3466
• 36 — 3600
• 37 — 3733
• 40 — 4000
• 41 — 4133
• 42 — 4266
• 46 — 4600
• 48 — 4800
• 50 — 5000
• 51 — 5133
• 53 — 5333

C = DIMM type

• C — UDIMM (Non-ECC Unbuffered)
• S — SODIMM (Non-ECC Unbuffered)

15 = CAS latency

• 9 — CL9
• 10 — CL10
• 11-CL11
• 12-CL12
• 13-CL13
• 14-CL14
• 15-CL15
• 16 — CL16
• 17-CL17
• 18-CL18
• 19-CL19
• 20 — CL20

P =

series

• F — FURY
• B — Beast
• S — Savage
• P — Predator
• I — Impact

B = heatsink

• not specified — blue
• B — black
• R — red
• W — white

3 = version

• 2 — 2 ⁱ version
• 3 — 3 ⁱ version
• 4 — 4 ⁱ version

A = RGB

• n/a — without RGB lighting
• A — RGB lighting

K4 = kit + number of modules per kit

• not specified — single module
• K2 — set of 2 modules
• K4 — set of 4 modules
• K8 — set of 8 modules

32 = total capacity

• 4 — 4 GB
• 8 — 8 GB
• 16 — 16 GB
• 32 — 32 GB
• 64 — 64 GB
• 128 — 128 GB
• 256 — 256 GB

Part number: KSM26RD4L/32HAI

• KSM
• 26
• R
• D
• 4
• L
• /
• 32
• H
• A
• I

KSM = Kingston Server Premier

• KSM: Kingston Server Premier

26 = Speed ​​(MT/s ^{Part number: KVR21LR15D8LK2/4HBI}

• KVR
• 21
• L
• R
• 15
• D
• 8
• L
• K2
• /
• 4
• H
• B
• I

KVR = Kingston ValueRAM

• KVR : Kingston ValueRAM

21 = Speed ​​(MT/s ^{Part number: KVR16LR11D8LK2/4HB}

• KVR
• 16
• L
• R
• 11
• D
• 8
• L
• K2
• /
• 4
• H
• B

KVR = Kingston ValueRAM

• KVR: Kingston ValueRAM

16 = Speed ​​(MT/s ^{Part number: KVR1066D3LD8R7SLK2/46HB}

• KVR
• 1066
• D3
• L
• D
• 8
• R
• 7
• S
• L
• K2
• /
• 4G
• H
• B

KVR = Kingston ValueRAM

• KVR: Kingston ValueRAM

1066 = Speed ​​(MT/s ^{Part number: KVR400X72RC3AK2/1G}

• KVR
• 400
• X72
• R
• C3
• A
• K2
• /
• 1G

KVR = Kingston ValueRAM

• KVR: Kingston ValueRAM

400 = Speed ​​(MT/s ^* )

• 266
• 333
• 400

X72 = X72 ECC

• X72: X72 ECC

R = Registered

• R: Registered

C3 = Latency (CAS)

• C3: Latency (CAS)

A = DDR400 3-3-3

• A: DDR400 3-3-3

K2 = Kit + number of units

• K2: kit of two modules

1G = storage

• 1G: storage (GB)

Glossary

Capacity

The total number of available memory cells contained in a memory module expressed in gigabytes (GB). For kits, the listed capacity is the combined capacity of all modules in the kit.

CAS latency

Number of clock cycles predefined according to the standard for reading/writing data to/from modules and for the memory controller. After loading a read/write command as well as row/column addresses, CAS latency is the amount of time it takes to prepare that data.

DDR4

Fourth generation double data rate (DDR) synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM) memory technology, more commonly referred to as «DDR4». DDR4 memory modules are not backwards compatible with any previous generation DDR SDRAM due to lower voltage (1.2V), different pin configurations, and incompatible chip technology.

DDR5

Fifth generation double data rate (DDR) synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM) memory technology, more commonly referred to as «DDR5». DDR5 memory modules are not backwards compatible with any previous generation DDR SDRAM due to lower voltage (1. 1V), pin configuration differences, and incompatible chip manufacturing technology.

Memory Type DIMM

UDIMM (non-ECC Unbuffered Dual In-Line Memory Module) is a long form factor, x64 data width memory module most commonly used in desktop systems, where error correction is not required and DIMM capacity is limited.

SODIMM (Small Outline Dual In-Line Memory Module) is a reduced form factor memory module designed for small computing systems such as laptops, microservers, printers, or routers.

Gigabit (Gbps)

Bit is the smallest unit of data in calculations and is represented as 1 or 0 (on/off). A gigabit (Gbit) is 1 billion bits (or 10 ⁹ ) as defined in the International System of Units (SI). When describing computer memory, GB (or Gbit) is commonly used to express the density of an individual DRAM component.

Gigabyte (GB)

A byte consists of 8 bits. A gigabyte (GB) is 1 billion bytes (or 10 ⁹ ) as defined in the International System of Units (SI). When describing computer memory, GB is used to represent the total data capacity of a memory module or group of memory modules combined into a common system memory.

Kit

Part number that includes multiple memory modules, typically to support dual, triple, or quadruple memory architecture. For example, K2 = 2 DIMMs in a bundle to make up the total capacity.

Speed ​​(also called frequency)

The data transfer rate or effective clock rate supported by the memory module is measured in MHz (megahertz) or MT/s (megatransfers per second). The higher the speed, the more data can be transferred per second.

Rank

The rank indicates the addressable block of data in the memory module. On DDR2, DDR3, and DDR4 modules, these data blocks are 64 bits wide (x64), while modules with ECC feature use an additional 8 bits (x72). DDR5 modules also have 64 bits per rank, however, with the ECC function, the data block width is 80 bits per rank (x80). Modules can be single-rank (1R), dual-rank (2R), quad-rank (4R), or eight-rank (8R). Generally, the higher the number of ranks, the higher the capacity of each module.

Memory channel

A memory channel is a data transfer path between a memory module and a memory controller (usually located inside the processor). Most computing systems (PCs, laptops, servers) have a multi-channel memory architecture in which channels are combined to increase memory performance. The dual-channel memory architecture means that when a pair of identical modules are installed, the effective bandwidth of the memory controller is doubled.

Latency (timing)

The information below will help illustrate the various settings that can be adjusted when setting optimal RAM timings in the motherboard BIOS. Please note that these settings may vary depending on the manufacturer and model of the motherboard, as well as the BIOS firmware version.

Example

—

17

tRCD

—

17

tRP/tRCP

—

20

tRA/tRD/tRAS

CAS latency (CL): Delay between activation and line reading.

RAS-CAS Delay or RAS Column (tRCP): Enables the row

Row Precharge Delay or RAS Precharge Delay (tRP/tRCP): Disables the row

Row Active Delay or RAS Active Delay or Time to Ready (tRA/tRD) /tRAS): Number of clock cycles between row activation/deactivation.

Disclaimer. All Kingston products are tested to published specifications. Some system or motherboard configurations may not run at Kingston’s published speeds or published timing settings. Kingston discourages users from attempting to overclock their computers faster than published speeds. Overclocking the processor or changing system timing can damage computer components. 13.5x FSB/ht/qpi 20011 CASH L1, KB 128 x 2 CB 512 X 2 X 2 — power voltage, in 1.25 ~ 1.35 TDP, W 65 SOLD ARENSISTORS, MILLD 221

0 9000 9000 9000 9ATLLLOLL sq.

mm 118 960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760Kathlon X4 750Kathlon X4 740athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8-5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3650A6-3600A6-3500A4-3400A4-3300PHEL0T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan) Duron 950 (Spitfire) Duron 900 (Morgan) Duron 900 ( Spitfire) Duron 850 Duron 800 Duron 750 Duron 700 Duron 650 Duron 600 Athlon 1000 (Orion) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760Kathlon X4 750Kathlon X4 740athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8-5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3650A6-3600A6-3500A4-3400A4-3300PHEL0T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan) Duron 950 (Spitfire) Duron 900 (Morgan) Duron 900 ( Spitfire) Duron 850 Duron 800 Duron 750 Duron 700 Duron 650 Duron 600 Athlon 1000 (Orion) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370)Celeron 333 (Slot 1)Celeron 300A (S370)Celeron 300A (Slot 1)Celeron 300Celeron 266

You can simultaneously select
up to 10 processors by holding Ctrl

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processors:0003

• The full range of dual, triple and quad-core AMD processors in one big test and comparison against Intel processors

long awaited DDR2 on AMD Athlon X2 platform / Processors and memory

Author: Vladimir Romanchenko
Dmitry Sofronov

Today can be called the starting point of a new era of processor architecture from AMD. It was today that AMD announced the start of deliveries of AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ dual-core processors compatible with the new AMD Socket AM2 processor socket, supporting AMD Virtualization technology and unbuffered DDR2 memory. a line of new AMD Athlon 64 X2, AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Sempron chips compatible with Socket AM2.

Yes, the long-awaited implementation of DDR2 memory support by AMD chips is undoubtedly a major event, although, in fact, there were no radical changes in the architecture of the processor core itself this time. The single- and dual-core processors announced today for the new Socket AM2 feature a new memory controller with DDR2 support. Along with this, for the first time, support for a number of new technologies has been implemented, the work of already known functions has been optimized, and a number of other architectural innovations have been introduced. However, on an evolutionary basis, no more, which to some extent reflects the new core stepping — Revision F. Bringing together the real architecture innovations announced today, we can count four points:

1. DDR2 SDRAM support
2. Support for AMD Virtualization Technology (AMD-V)
3. Implementation of Power-Efficient Processors
4. Implementation of 2-channel memory support for Sempron processors

The key event behind the transition to a new version of AMD processors for
desktop PCs with the new 940-pin AM2 connector — implementation
DDR2 memory support. Since the memory controller is integrated into the processor,
the main difficulty of this stage is not the emergence of new types of memory
(fortunately, DDR2 has already become widespread and even managed to significantly
cheaper), and not even the appearance of any special versions of chipsets
for a new platform (although the need for good chipsets has never disappeared). The main question is how well AMD managed to implement this very integrated controller with DDR2 support.

First we will try
sort through all the information available to date on new
chips, then move on to testing.

Architecture
Socket AM2 processor socket. From this moment, Socket AM2 versions of AMD chips for all market segments — Athlon 64, Athlon 64 X2 and Sempron — will appear on store shelves one after another. These chips are united by the DDR2 version of the processor core — Revision F, although each segment has its own working name.

• Windsor — dual-core Socket AM2 processors Athlon 64 FX and Athlon 64 X2 , with support for 2-channel DDR2-533/667/800 memory and Pacifica technology.
  Manufactured using 90 nm process technology using SOI; have 2 x 1 MB L2 cache.
• Orleans — Single-core Socket AM2 processors Athlon 64 supporting 2-channel
  DDR2-533/667 memory and Pacifica technology. Produced using
  norms 90 nm process technology using SOI; have 1 MB L2 cache.
• Manila — single-core inexpensive Socket AM2 processors Sempron with support for 2-channel DDR2-533/667 memory. Manufactured using 90 nm process technology using SOI; have up to 256 KB L2 cache.

Slightly deviating from the topic, I still note that with the massive appearance of DDR2
versions of low-cost AMD Sempron chips, which is expected this summer, the era
widespread use of DDR1 memory can be called a fast-flying
into oblivion. Swiftness in this regard, of course, is a relative thing, yes
and about the complete curtailment of Socket 9 production39 speech processors not yet maintained,
but for sober-minded buyers, this should be a very clear wake-up call…

New revision F with the same 90 nm process technology, support for high-speed memory
up to DDR2-800, Pacifica’s claimed technology, energy efficient,
required some internal redesign. In the picture below
where dual-core are compared
revision E chips and
F, the increased area between the L2 caches is most easily seen.

Windsor VS Toledo

However, the figure only schematically reproduces the scale. In fact, the area
new kernel Rev. F has increased relative to the Rev. E about 13% —
up to 220 sq. mm (from 194
sq. mm). Accordingly — by 18%, the size of 1 MB of L2 caches also increased — from 106
sq. mm at Rev. E (for the first steppings — 115 sq. mm) up to 126 sq. mm for processors
Rev. F. At the same time, the L2 cache SRAM areas have been reduced.
If 1 MB L2 cache for Rev. E covers an area of ​​41.4 square meters. mm (respectively,
82.8 sq. mm for a dual-core design), the new Rev. F this
indicator decreased to 38.7 square meters. mm (77.4 mm in the dual-core version).

The number of transistors that make up each chip has increased. If the dual-core K8 processors currently available in stores have 233 million transistors, then the Rev. F there are already 243 million, that is, about 4% more. A complete analogy with single-core processors: 120 million transistors in a single-core K8 chip are replaced by 129 million transistors in the Rev. processor. F, here the increase is even greater, by 7.5%.

Increasing the area of ​​the core with a decrease in the area of ​​the cache and the same manufacturing process for Rev. F is thought provoking. Indeed, AMD K8 stepping chips
Rev. D and Rev. E were and are being produced with the same 90 nm process technology PD-SOI
(Partially Depleted Silicon-on-Insulator), with 9-layer copper plating.

Total, the area of ​​SRAM cells in the cache has decreased, the number of transistors has increased,
as well as the total area of ​​the chip. You can, of course, write off everything on a new controller
memory
DDR2 (indeed, support for DDR2-800 instead of DDR-400 required a significant
alterations of signal lines) and technology support
Pacifica, but surrenders
me, something else will «tick» in
these processors for the time being. For example, pledged, but not yet declared
support for Presidio technology (similar to Intel LaGrande). Good for now
it is not really known what to do with the same virtualization — AMD Pacifica, maybe
and she, as realized from the very beginning
in architecture 64-bit, also by and large «stays in a stall» up to
appearance
new generation of Microsoft Vista operating systems.

In fact, judging by the latest publications on the Web, a significant redesign
core (namely the core, not the memory controller) is expected due to the advent of
the next steppings are Revision G and Revision H. In the case of Rev. G is expected
at least a significant redesign of the branch prediction module, and in Rev.
H — even a new generation of the FPU (Floating Point Unit) module.

Schematic representation of potential cores Rev. G and Rev. H

There is no point in this article to go into details
the next generation of AMD64 architectures, however, I note that most likely, in
a new revision of the core of some significant redesign of modules, from which
performance directly depends, was not. In other words, the performance gain
if we should expect it, then only due to the increase in clock frequencies and efficiency
implementation of a new memory controller.

However, another significant change implemented in the new AM2 processors
revision F is still available, because versions of chips with different power consumption are announced.
Now AMD will release

economical desktop processors of the Energy Efficient Desktop Processor class.
A number of new Socket AM2 chips AMD Athlon 64 X2, AMD
Athlon 64 and AMD Sempron with AMD Cool’n’Quiet technology and reduced
power consumption. The new economy chips will be grouped into two sub-classes,
with TDP 65W and TDP 35W.

Imagine, now in the store you can find three versions of the chip
with a completely similar name — AMD
Athlon 64 3500+ or ​​3800+ , one of them is «regular»,
with TDP 89W, another Energy Efficient, with TDP 65W, and finally the third option
— Energy Efficient
Small Form Factor Desktop Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2, 35W TDP. Processors
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ and 3800+ will be
presented in versions for Socket 939 and Socket AM2, the same
in the case of AMD Sempron 64 processors
3000+, 3200+, 3400+, 3500+ and 3600+.

Chip	Core	Frequency	L1 cache	L2 cache	TDP	HT Link	Memory
Athlon 64 FX-62	Windsor	2. 8 GHz	128 Kb x 2	1 Mb x 2	125W	2 GHz	DDR2-800 / 667 / 533 / 400
Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Windsor	2.6 GHz	128 Kb x 2	512 Kb x 2	89 W	2 GHz	DDR2-800 / 667 / 533 / 400
Athlon 64 X2 4800+		2.4 GHz		1 Mb x 2
Athlon 64 X2 4600+		2.4 GHz		512 Kb x 2
Athlon 64 X2 4400+		2.2 GHz		1 Mb x 2
Athlon 64 X2 4200+		2. 2 GHz		512 Kb x 2
Athlon 64 X2 4000+		2.0 GHz		1 Mb x 2
Athlon 64 X2 3800+		2.0 GHz		512 Kb x 2
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 X2 4800+	Windsor	2.4 GHz	128 Kb x 2	1 Mb x 2	65 W	2 GHz	DDR2-800 / 667 / 533 / 400
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 X2 4600+		2.4 GHz		512 Kb x 2
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 X2 4400+		2.2 GHz		1 Mb x 2
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 X2 4200+		2. 2 GHz		512 Kb x 2
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 X2 4000+		2.0 GHz		1 Mb x 2
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 X2 3800+		2.0 GHz		512 Kb x 2
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 X2 3800+	Windsor	2.0 GHz	128 Kb x 2	512 Kb x 2	35W	2 GHz	DDR2-800 / 667 / 533 / 400
Athlon 64 3800+	Orleans	2.4 GHz	128 Kb	512 Kb	62 W	2 GHz	DDR2-667 / 533 / 400
Athlon 64 3500+		2. 2 GHz		512 Kb
Energy Efficient Athlon 64 3500+	Orleans	2.2 GHz	128 Kb	512 Kb	35W	2 GHz	DDR2-667 / 533 / 400
Sempron 3600+	Manila	2.0 GHz	128 Kb	256 Kb	62 W	1.6 GHz	DDR2-667 / 533 / 400
Sempron 3500+		2.0 GHz		128 Kb
Sempron 3400+		1.8 GHz		256 Kb
Sempron 3200+		1. 8 GHz		128 Kb
Sempron 3000+		1.6 GHz		128 Kb
Energy Efficient Sempron 3400+	Manila	1.8 GHz	128 Kb	256 Kb	35W	1.6 GHz	DDR2-667 / 533 / 400
Energy Efficient Sempron 3200+		1.8 GHz		128 Kb
Energy Efficient Sempron 3000+		1.6 GHz		128 Kb

B
chip names meanwhile, there is no difference, the difference is only in price, numbers
batches of chips yes in the indication of TDP on the boxes. No doubt, to the emergence of new processors
Intel Conroe needs to prepare properly, but from such «certainties» becomes
creepy…

A few words about retail supply, labeling and indicative wholesale
prices of new Socket AM2 AMD chips. At the time of writing, I had to operate
preliminary unconfirmed data, so they will be presented
in a fairly compressed form. This is how the marking of boxed («boxed»)
processor versions:

• SDAXXXXCNBOX — means line Sempron , XXXX — PR rating of chip
• ADAXXXXCUBOX — means Athlon 64 X2 line with 1 MB total L2 cache, XXXX — PR rating
  chip
• ADAXXXXCSBOX — means Athlon 64 X2 line with 2 MB of L2 cache, XXXX
  — PR rating of the chip
• ADAFXXXCSBOX means Athlon 64 FX where the last two XX are the model number

processors

Wholesale prices for boxed (chip, cooler, instructions) version of the new Socket AM2 AMD
Type	Real clock frequency	L2 cache	TDP	Price
Sempron 64 Energy Efficient
Sempron 64 2800+	1. 6 GHz	128 Kb	35 W	$65
Sempron 64 3200+	1.8 GHz	128 Kb	35 W	$85
Sempron 64 3500+	2.0 GHz	128 Kb	35 W	$105
Sempron 64 Energy Efficient
Sempron 64 3000+	1.6 GHz	256 Kb	35 W	$75
Sempron 64 3400+	1.8 GHz	256 Kb	35 W	$95
Sempron 64 3600+	2. 0 GHz	256 Kb	35 W	$120
Athlon 64 Energy Efficient, Pacifica Virtualisation
Athlon 64 3000+	1.80 GHz	512 Kb	65 W	$109
Athlon 64 3200+	2.00 GHz	512 Kb	65 W	$154
Athlon 64 3500+	2.20 GHz	512 Kb	65 W	$184
Athlon 64 3800+	2.40 GHz	512 Kb	65 W	$284
Athlon 64 X2 (Dual Core), Pacifica Virtualisation
Athlon 64 X2 3800+	2. 00 GHz	512 Kb x 2	89W	$299
Athlon 64 X2 4200+	2.20 GHz	512 Kb x 2	89W	$359
Athlon 64 X2 4600+	2.40 GHz	512 Kb x 2	89W	$589
Athlon 64 X2 5000+	2.60 GHz	512 Kb x 2	89W	$696
Athlon 64 X2 (Dual Core), Pacifica Virtualisation
Athlon 64 X2 4000+	2.00 GHz	1 Mb x 2	89W	$328
Athlon 64 X2 4400+	2. 20 GHz	1 Mb x 2	89W	$459
Athlon 64 X2 4800+	2.40 GHz	1 Mb x 2	89W	$639
Athlon 64 FX (Dual Core), Pacifica Virtualisation
Athlon 64 FX-62	2.80 GHz	1 Mb x 2	89W	$1031

Unfortunately, at the time of writing
article our test lab did not have any working documentation
about Socket AM2 AMD processors in general and about the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ chip,
who took part in this comparative testing, in particular. Usually
such details become known to journalists a little ahead of time, but the case
not the one. I will say more, the opportunity to coincide with the testing of the official announcement
AM2 chips
not at all
associated with the activities of the Russian division of AMD, and took place only
thanks to the Moscow office of MSI, for which they
thank you so much.

here
why the saying flower
so
short and superficial. «Dig deeper» will be possible only after the official
chip announcement. We are moving on to the fairy tale-berry,
namely, studying the possibilities of a new processor core, a new controller
DDR-2 memory and comparing their work with the capabilities of the architecture of the previous
generations.

Let’s get acquainted with the participants of our today’s testing. Processor AMD
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is certainly not the top chip in the new line of Socket AM2 processors
and he obviously won’t set records today, but on the other hand, get to know
closer to one of the potentially «most popular chips» — maybe it
and for the better.

The processor has the following marking:

AMD Athlon 64 X2
ADA4000IAA6CS
ACBYF 0551RPAW

Let’s try to disassemble the OPN of this chip — ADA4000IAA6CS. The first three letters are «ADA»,
meaning brand and performance are quite familiar, as are the four following
followed by numbers indicating the processor’s PR rating. But the character «I» in
of the current revision of the document «AMD Athlon 64 Processor Power and Thermal
Data Sheet» is not present. By analogy with the existing designations of this
positions where «A» refers to the 754-pin OµPGA package and «D» refers to
939-pin OµPGA, we conclude that «I» is now assigned to 940-pin
chips for Socket AM2. The next two characters are «A» and «A»,
mean core voltage and chip body temperature, respectively. For both
cases we find in the tables that «A» means «Variable».

Well, thanks for that. A plate deciphering the meaning of the next digit
as the volume of the L2 cache, ends with «5», that is, 1 MB, from which
we make a logical conclusion that «6» should mean 2 MB (2 x 1 MB). Two
the last characters mean chip stepping. Official data ends
on «CG» — Rev. E4, so «CS» might well match
some variant of the Rev. f.

The information obtained using the CPU-Z utility confirms this data and
makes additional clarifications about the core supply voltage and chip stepping
— Rev. F2.

Studying the appearance of the Socket AM2 processor, as well as the Socket AM2 connector
in comparison with Socket 939 shows that in addition to adding one more contact
the location of the «stubs» has changed, so that the 939-pin chip in
Socket AM2 cannot be inserted in any way. A kind of «protection against a fool.»
Not armed with a hammer.

with socket AM2. Instead of the usual multiple protrusions in Socket 754/940/939
systems, in the case of Socket AM2 we find one symmetrically located
a ledge for attaching a cooler on each side.

MSI K9N SLI Platinum motherboard took part in today’s testing
in the ATX form factor, designed to work with Socket AM2 AMD processors
Athlon 64/X2/FX.

The board is based on the NVIDIA nForce 570 SLI chipset, supports up to four
DIMM DDR2-800 modules in 2-channel mode (up to 8 GB in total), equipped with two
PCI Express x8 slots (one of them supports PCI Express x16), two
PCIe x1 slots, three PCI 2.3 slots, four SATA2 interfaces with support
RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 7.1ch HD Audio, Dual Gigabit LAN, ten USB ports
2.0 etc.

The board is also interesting for supporting Dual CoreCell technology with overclocking
D.O.T. function Express and silent cooling of Silent Heatsink components.

On the whole, the new series of NVIDIA nForce 500 chipsets, the start of deliveries of which
almost timed to coincide with the announcement of Socket AM2 chips, consists of four modifications
for each market segment previously dominated by nForce4 SLI chipsets
X16, nForce4 SLI, nForce4 Ultra and nForce4.

NVIDIA nForce 500	nForce 590 SLI	nForce 570 SLI	nForce 570 Ultra	nForce 550
Processor support	Athlon 64FX Athlon 64X2 Athlon 64	Athlon 64FX Athlon 64X2 Athlon 64	Athlon 64FX Athlon 64X2 Athlon 64	Athlon 64FX Athlon 64 X2 Athlon 64 Sempron
Chipset composition	C51XE + MCP55PXE	MCP55P	MCP55Ultra	MCP55S
SLI support	PCI Express x16 x 2	PCI Express x8 x 2	—	—
LinkBoost support	+	—	—	—
No. of PCI Express lanes/ No. of buses	46/9	28/6	20/5	20/5
Max no. of PCI slots	5	5	5	5
SATA/PATA	6/2 (1 channel)	6/2 (1 channel)	6/2 (1 channel)	4/2 (1 channel)
RAID	RAID 0/1/10/5	RAID 0/1/10/5	RAID 0/1/10/5	RAID 0/1/10
USB ports	10	10	10	10
GbE MAC	2	2	2	1
TCP/IP Offload support	+	+	+	—
Teaming support	+	+	+	—
FirstPacket Support	+	+	+	—

A few brief explanations of the chipset specifications. Implemented in version
nForce 590 SLI Link Boost technology means that if the chipset is used
nForce 590 SLI with GeForce 7900 GTX graphics peak performance
interface increases by 25% — from 8 Gb / s to 10 Gb / s.

About the so-called «SLI Ready» EPP (Enhanced Performance Profiles) memory
we have already written in our news and publications. This memory has already been announced
Corsair Memory, and we just have to wait in our laboratory
availability of testing kits.

The TCP/IP Offload function is familiar from chipset versions for server applications.
Now it is present in most chipsets of the nForce 500 series, and the principle
Her work is shown on the slide below.

As far as Teaming support is concerned, the essence of it is to combine
two Ethernet MAC levels present in the new series chipsets to double
channel bandwidth. In other words, using two built-in 1Gbps
LAN controller, you can get a single LAN controller with the performance
up to 2 Gbps.

And finally, the FirstPacket function, which optimizes the priorities for sending packets
data, including VoIP applications.

The key element of today’s testing is a set of two 240-pin
Corsair XMS2 6400 Series CM2X1024-6400PRO Memory Modules
Memory, with a capacity of 1 GB each, with timings of 5-5-5-12.

In total, the following components were used in the test bench:

MSI K9N SLI Platinum motherboard based on the NVIDIA nForce 570 SLI 9 chipset0322
Processor Athlon 64 X2 4000+, Socket AM2, 2.0 GHz
Memory Corsair 2 x 1 GB DDR2-800
Video card ATI Radeon X1900XTX 512 MB

As a platform for comparison, a system was assembled on the following components:

MSI K8N Diamond Plus motherboard based on the NVIDIA nForce4 SLI x16 chipset
Processor Athlon 64 X2 4200+, Socket 939, nominal frequency 2.20 GHz
Memory Corsair 2 x 512 MB DDR 400
Video card ATI Radeon X1900XTX 512 MB

Similar test conditions for an adequate comparison of platforms were achieved
as follows: Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor multiplier was set to
value 10, that is, the final clock frequency was set to the same value as
2000 MHz.

Synthetic tests

significantly affecting the performance of new AM2 chips, in the processor
the core of the new revision was not made, you should look for performance change dependencies
on the operating mode of the memory controller. Since in new AMD processors (like
and in the «old» K8) everything is tied to HyperTransport and there is no FSB as a class,
the memory controller integrated into the chip is not properly coordinated, does not «sound
in unison» with any type of memory, starting from DDR2-400 and DDR2-533,
ending with DDR2-667, DDR2-800 and even DDR2-1066.

That’s why our testing focused on selecting the best
various modes of memory operation, I wanted to thoroughly consider the change
system performance depending on memory frequency and timings. Can,
of course it was, for the sake of interest, add test results to the comparative tables
other AMD chips or other processor architectures. But it makes little sense
since it seemed to us more visual to approximate later the difference
in the performance of systems with Socket AM2 and Socket 939 processors to others
articles where Socket 939 chips appear, rather than impoverish our results by citing
less testing of Socket AM2 systems with different memory settings.

On this page we present the results of testing in synthetic benchmarks. For convenience, the results of the system with DDR2 memory are highlighted in shades of yellow, systems with DDR400 memory — in green. After the memory type, the values ​​of the memory timings at which testing was carried out are indicated.

Let’s start with Everest Ultimate ver. 2.80.534.

The very first test results clearly confirm the thesis that
yes, indeed, AMD processors with support for DDR2 memory have absolutely nothing
it would be done in the era of the spread of DDR2-533, not to mention DDR2-400.
However, in practice, if a more or less impressive «separation» is noticeable anywhere,
so it is with a system with DDR2-800, with a decent latency. Even DDR2-667 in some places «merges» with the usual
non-overclocked DDR-400 memory.

Now let’s see what other synthetic package thinks about this
— PCMark’05.

PCMark’05.

And this is the final verdict of PCMark’05:

tests and summarizing the results, it can be noted that in general, latency and performance
DDR400 memory is actually comparable to a system equipped with DDR2-667 4-4-3 memory.

That is, guided by these tests, if I were now «impatient» to change
system based on Socket 939 Athlon 64 X2 and DDR400 memory, but was not on sale
nothing
better
combinations
the same Athlon 64 X2 for Socket AM2 and DDR2-667 memory is unlikely
would
the sheepskin was worth the candle. DDR2-800 is a completely different matter, but still before
purchase will have to carefully study the price tags for this memory. Let’s see,
how this «game» will look like when tested in real applications…

Testing in real applications

Before moving on to testing in real applications, one more key
test, 3DMark 2005 Pro.

Oh, yes, here the «reputation» of DDR2-667 memory looks a bit more
reliable, although, for the sake of justice, it must be admitted, even with the «older» DDR2-800
a system of neither stars nor parrots from the sky is missing. A small natural increase
there is a fact. But no more.

Now let’s see what the test system is capable of in real applications.

All benefices under the root are cut by high memory latency. Like it or not, DDR1 looks quite decent in this test, although it loses its lead.

Now some typical and uncompromising 3D gaming tests.

That, in fact, is what was required to be proved. Yes, in gaming applications
the same picture — if you do not have the opportunity to buy DDR2-800, it is better to
the matter is not to get involved. Even when using it, the performance gain
does not go beyond the measurement error.

Results and conclusions

So, did the first DDR2 pancake from AMD come out lumpy? In spite of
many «buts», this debut cannot be called unsuccessful. If only because
already available in retail component base, you can achieve quite acceptable
results, albeit slightly, but exceeding the capabilities of the previous generation.

Another thing is whether you should rush to buy a Socket AM2 system right now.
New equal frequency processors are usually slightly more expensive than their Socket 939
analogues, and it is unlikely that their TDP, which has decreased from 89 W to, for example, 65 W (35 W versions are even more expensive) is such a strong incentive to change the system.

And what about the price of memory? Where and how to shop is, of course, a private matter.
each, but judging by current prices, the purchase of DDR2-800 modules will cost approximately
one third more expensive than the same DDR2-667 kit, and only about 10%
it will be cheaper to buy DDR400 with CL2. Here DDR2-533 will cost almost less
half, but judging by the tests, who needs it for nothing, in relation to the Socket
AM2.

Still upgrading or at least switching to a new one if possible
the platform makes sense already now. I won’t undertake to approximate the results of today’s tests for the older models of the Socket AM2 processor series with full confidence, but still, it’s worth starting to think about replacing the platform, if only because Socket AM2, by all indications, will come to us for a relatively long time.
At least the next kernel revision is Rev. G, which is expected to be announced in December 2006, will definitely be released for Socket AM2. Along with the transition to the new 65 nm process technology, the new cores are expected to have certain improvements in computing modules and further cache optimization, which cannot but affect performance.

It is also quite obvious that the number of announcements of new «overclockers» —
what can I say, and ordinary DDR modules will be catastrophic in the near future
will approach zero. And indeed, where are they now — except for the VIA EDEN platform, because high speeds have never been required there. In general, now the transition of the industry to DDR2 can be called if not completed, then quite a decided matter, that’s for sure. And this transition, I think, can be considered almost complete closer to the New Year, and it is unlikely that even inexpensive Socket 9 will save the already rising DDR1 price.39 Sempron processors.

And finally, the answer to another interesting question. Really
did it make sense for AMD to «wait» for the mass appearance of DDR2-800 memory in order to effectively release a core with support for this type of memory, or is it Socket
Should AM2 chips have appeared earlier, so that the painful transition to a new processor socket would be over by this time? Those who even ran through our material diagonally can only grin when answering this question. Yes, time in AMD «pulled» not in vain. The reverse and rather pleasant side of this delay was the excellent readiness of the industry, especially motherboard manufacturers, to enter retail. Everything has been checked and rechecked for a long time, and in fact, the stop was for a small thing — for today’s go-ahead AMD…

Square table

Square table

Definition
Calculator — square of a number
Table of squares

Download table of squares

Definition. The square of the number is the given number raised to the second power (the number multiplied by itself).

a ² = a a

It is called «Square» because such an operation is similar to calculating the area of ​​a square.

Calculator for calculating the square of the number

² = 49 ≈ 0.4444444444444444

Below are two convenient tables of squares of natural numbers from 1 to 100.

Table of squares of numbers from 1 to 100

38 39 ² = 1521

40 ² = 1600

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111AL

11111111111111111111111111ALS = 2601

52 ² = 2704

53 ² = 2809

54 ² = 2916

55 ² = 30283 = 31649 2 ^{2 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000}

58 ² = 3364

59 ² = 3481

60 ² = 3600

68 ^{2 2 9000 = 4900}

1 2 = 1 2 2 = 4 3 2 = 9 4 2 = 16,000,0003 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000.000 = 25 6 2 = 36 7 2 = 49 8 2 = 64 2 = 81 10 2 = 100	11 2 = 121 9000 = 144 13 2 = 169 14 2 = 196 15 2 = 225 16 2 = 256 17 2 = 289 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 324 19 2 = 361 20 2 = 400	21 2 = 441 22 2 = 484 23 2 = 529 24 2 = 576 25 2 = 625 26 2 = 676 27 2 = 729 28 2 = 784 29 2 = 841 2 = 900 9000 916 32 2 = 1024 33 2 = 1089 34 2 = 1156 35 2 = 1225 36 2 = 1296
41 2 = 1681 42 2 = 1764 9000 45 2 = 2025 46 2 = 2116 47 2 = 2209 48 2 = 2304 2 = 2401 50 2 = 2500	61 2 = 3721 62 2 = 3844 63 2 = 3969 64 2 = 4096 65 2 = 4225 66 2 = 4356 67 2
71 2 = 5041 72 2 = 5184 73 2 = 5329 74 2 = 5476 75 2 = 5625 76 2 = 5776 77 2 = 5929 78 2 = 6084 79 2 = 6241 80 2 = 6400	81 2 = 6561 82 2 = 6724 83 2 = 6889 84 2 = 7056 85 2 = 7225 86 2 = 7396 87 2 = 7569 88 2 = 7744 89 2 = 7921 90 2 = 8100	91 2 = 8281 92 2 = 8464 93 2 = 8649 94 2 = 8836 95 2 = 9025 96 2 = 9216 97 2 = 9409 98 2 = 9604 999 2 9801 100 2 = 10000

9000

Table of squares

0 529

11801

	0	7	1	2	3	4	7		6 6	7			0010 0	0	1	4	9	16	25	36	49	64	81
1	100	121	144	169	196	225	256	289	324	361
2	400	441	484	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529	529 52	676	729	784	841
3	900	961	1024	1089	1156	1225	1296	1369	1444	1521
4	1600	1681	1764	1849	1936	2025	2116	2209	2304	2401
5	2500	2601	2704	2809	2916	3025	3136	3249	3364	3481
6	3600	3721	3844	3969	4096	4225	4356	4489	4624	4761
7	4900	5041	5184	5329 5476	011	5625	5776	5929	6084	6241
8	6400	6561	6724	6889	7056	7225	7396	7569	7744	7921
	8100	8281	8464	8649	8836	9025	9216	9409	96004

 Print square table

© 2011-2022 Mikhail Dovzhik
Copying of materials is prohibited.