gtx-660-ti-vs-gtx-1050 — Google Suche
AlleVideosShoppingBilderMapsNewsBücher
Suchoptionen
Unser Urteil: Die GTX 1050 Ti ist schneller mit 48% für 1440p-Spiele. Die GTX 660 eignet sich eher für Budget-PC-Builds und weniger anspruchsvolle Spiele.
GTX 660 vs GTX 1050 Ti Benchmarks für Spieleleistungen (i7 …
www.gpucheck.com › nvidia-geforce-gtx-660-vs-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti
Hervorgehobene Snippets
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti
versus.com › Home › Grafikkarte Vergleich
Warum ist Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 besser als Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti? · 477MHz schnellere GPU-Taktfrequenz · 10.83 GPixel/s höhere Pixelrate · 75W niedrigere TDP …
Nvidia GTX 1050 vs 660-Ti — GPU UserBenchmarks
gpu.userbenchmark.com › Compare › Nvidia-GTX-…
Based on 296196 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GTX 1050 and the GTX 660-Ti, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 691 . ..
Ähnliche Fragen
Ist die GTX 1050 TI besser als die GTX 1050?
Wie alt ist die GTX 660?
Ist die GTX 1050 TI gut für Gaming?
Ist Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 gut?
GeForce GTX 1050 vs 660 Ti [in 10 Benchmarks] — Technical City
technical.city › Grafikkarten › GeForce GTX 1050 vs 660 Ti
Wir vergleichen im Detail NVIDIA GTX 1050 mit NVIDIA GTX 660 Ti: Spezifikationen, Computerspiele, Benchmarks.
Spezifikationen · Speicher · Benchmarks · Spiele
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 660 Ti [in 8 Benchmarks] — Technical City
technical.city › Grafikkarten › GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 660 Ti
Wir vergleichen im Detail NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti mit NVIDIA GTX 660 Ti: Spezifikationen, Computerspiele, Benchmarks.
GTX 660 Ti vs GTX 1050 Ti Benchmarks für Spieleleistungen …
www.gpucheck.com › amd-athlon-x4-860k-vs-amd-athlon-x4-860k
Unser Urteil: Der GTX 660 Ti ist schneller mit 31% für 1080p-Spiele. Das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ist für GTX 1050 Ti viel besser.
Die GTX 1050 Ti eignet …
GTX 660 vs GTX 1050 Ti | 15 Games Test | How Big The Difference
www.youtube.com › watch
04.11.2021 · Gtx660vsGtx1050ti #15GamesTest0:00 INTRO00:09 GPU’S SPECS00:16 TITAN FALL 21:01 …
Dauer: 16:38
Gepostet: 04.11.2021
GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti — Gagadget.com
gagadget.com › graphics-cards › geforce-gtx-1050-…
Main Specs · GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050. · Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a …
Power consumption (TDP): 75 Watt
Recommended system power (PSU): 300 Watt
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — How Many FPS
howmanyfps.com › graphics-cards › comparisons
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare …
Than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti -: 75 vs 150 Watts
Than GeForce GTX 660 Ti -: 650 vs 615 FPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 660 — HWBench
hwbench.
com › vgas › geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-gefor…
We compare the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti against the GeForce GTX 660 across a wide set of games and benchmarks to help you choose which you should get.
Ähnliche Suchanfragen
GTX 660 Ti vs GTX 1650
GTX 660 Ti vs GTX 1060
GTX 660 Ti vs GTX 750 Ti
GTX 660 Ti vs GT 1030
GTX 660 Ti vs GTX 1080
GTX 750 Ti vs GTX 1050
GTX 660 Ti vs GTX 1650 super
GTX 660 Ti vs GTX 1060 3GB
沒有絕對，NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti、GTX 960 與 GTX 1050 Ti 實測
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 與 GeForce GTX 960 在市場上存活，所以…
NVIDIA 在 10 月份發表了 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB 顯示卡，但目前市場上同區間有 GeForce GTX 750 Ti 與 GeForce GTX 960，因此 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB 並沒有想像中熱賣。
我們早前曾拿 Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming 與 Sapphire RX 470 OC 進行比較。
而這次，我們則是找了 GeForce GTX 750 Ti、GeForce GTX 960 與 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 進行比較，透過多項數據，讓各位在選購上有一個參考。GeForce GTX 750 Ti 選擇的是 ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5；GeForce GTX 960 選擇的是 MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G；至於 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 則是 ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G。
至於為何如此選擇，其實也沒什麼理由，就隨便做出選擇。
ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 提供 HDMI、DVI-D x2 與 D-SUB 接頭，不需 PCIe 6 PIN 或 8 PIN 額外供電，由於雙 DVI 的設計，讓它變成一張雙槽顯示卡
MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G 需要 PCIe 8 PIN 供電，也是三款顯示卡裡面重量最重的一張，主因在於搭配 3 根熱導管的散熱器。這張顯示卡沒有 D-SUB 接頭，但提供 DVI-I、HDMI 與 DisplayPory x 3。
ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G 是一張相當精簡設計的 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti，甚至可以見到 ASUS 的 PCB 上保有 PCIe 6 PIN，但實際上並沒有採用。至於影像輸出部分，使用者可以透過 HDMI 2.
0、DVI-D 或者是 DisplayPort 1.4 接頭。
| ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 | MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G | ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G | |
| GPU | GM107 | GM206 | GP107-400 |
| CUDA Cores | 640 | 1024 | 768 |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 40 | 64 | 48 |
| Memory Size | 2048 MB | 2048 MB | 4096 MB |
| GPU Clock | 1020 MHz | 1190 MHz | 1291 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz | 1753 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Power Limit | 38W | 130W | 75W |
| Fan Speed | Auto | Auto | Auto |
| 製表：Benchlife.info x Autobuy | |||
| 3DMark 11 | |||
| ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 | MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G | ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G | |
| Entry | |||
| Graphics Score | 9683. 00 |
18620.00 | 16263.00 |
| GT 1 | 46.80 | 89.05 | 80.37 |
| GT 2 | 44.15 | 85.02 | 73.41 |
| GT 3 | 59.82 | 114.71 | 98.98 |
| GT 4 | 29.18 | 56.50 | 49.02 |
| Performance | |||
| Graphics Score | 5398.00 | 10489.00 | 9508.00 |
| GT 1 | 26.21 | 50.42 | 44.89 |
| GT 2 | 26.07 | 50.23 | 44.41 |
| GT 3 | 33.92 | 65.06 | 60.15 |
| GT 4 | 15.52 | 30.69 | 28.30 |
| Extreme | |||
| Graphics Score | 1644.00 | 3102.00 | 3075.00 |
| GT 1 | 9.21 | 17.40 | 16.36 |
| GT 2 | 8.59 | 16.16 | 15.75 |
| GT 3 | 8. 60 |
15.41 | 16.27 |
| GT 4 | 4.58 | 8.91 | 8.84 |
| 製表：Benchlife.info x Autobuy | |||
| 3DMark | |||
| ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 | MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G | ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G | |
| Fire Strike | |||
| Graphics Score | 4434.00 | 7849.00 | 7549.00 |
| GT 1 | 21.31 | 37.88 | 34.81 |
| GT 2 | 17.60 | 31.05 | 31.05 |
| Fire Strike Extreme | |||
| Graphics Score | 2040.00 | 3672.00 | 3569.00 |
| GT 1 | 10.53 | 19.09 | 17.45 |
| GT 2 | 7.72 | 13.72 | 13.97 |
| Fire Strike Ultra | |||
| Graphics Score | 865. 00 |
1361.00 | 1715.00 |
| GT 1 | 5.12 | 9.38 | 8.57 |
| GT 2 | 2.97 | 4.32 | 6.60 |
| Time Spy | |||
| Graphics Score | 1215.00 | 2303.00 | 2239.00 |
| GT 1 | 7.87 | 15.00 | 14.84 |
| GT 2 | 7.00 | 13.22 | 12.66 |
| 製表：Benchlife.info x Autobuy | |||
| Metro 2033 Redux, DirectX 11 | |||
| ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 | MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G | ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G | |
| Low, SSAA, AF 4X, Motion Blur: Normal, Tessellation: Off, Advanced PhysX: Off | |||
| Min FPS | 9.67 | 26.06 | 17.42 |
| Avg FPS | 61.33 | 95.00 | 48.67 |
| Max FPS | 271. 81 |
320.62 | 137.21 |
| Med, SSAA, AF 16X, Motion Blur: Normal, Tessellation: Normal, Advanced PhysX: Off | |||
| Min FPS | 10.45 | 24.88 | 19.33 |
| Avg FPS | 29.67 | 74.67 | 48.33 |
| Max FPS | 69.70 | 271.89 | 154.94 |
| Very High, SSAA, AF 16X, Motion Blur: Normal, Tessellation: Very High, Advanced PhysX: Off | |||
| Min FPS | 6.65 | 11.37 | 10.49 |
| Avg FPS | 17.00 | 29.33 | 28.33 |
| Max FPS | 51.15 | 68.33 | 60.39 |
| 製表：Benchlife.info x Autobuy | |||
| Metro：Last Light Redux, DirectX 11 | |||
| ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 | MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G | ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G | |
| Low, SSAA, AF 4X, Motion Blur: Normal, Tessellation: Off, Advanced PhysX: Off | |||
| Min FPS | 18. 25 |
23.65 | 19.47 |
| Avg FPS | 45.33 | 71.00 | 74.33 |
| Max FPS | 155.42 | 177.40 | 173.55 |
| Med, SSAA, AF 16X, Motion Blur: Normal, Tessellation: Normal, Advanced PhysX: Off | |||
| Min FPS | 14.33 | 18.91 | 20.89 |
| Avg FPS | 34.67 | 57.67 | 56.33 |
| Max FPS | 112.80 | 143.45 | 131.22 |
| Very High, SSAA, AF 16X, Motion Blur: Normal, Tessellation: Very High, Advanced PhysX: Off | |||
| Min FPS | 11.38 | 13.51 | 17.42 |
| Avg FPS | 19.00 | 29.67 | 29.67 |
| Max FPS | 66.78 | 72.76 | 72.66 |
| 製表：Benchlife.info x Autobuy | |||
| Tom Clancy’s The Division, DirectX 11 | |||
| ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 | MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G | ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G | |
| Preset = Low | |||
| Avg FPS | 57. 20 |
93.30 | 92.10 |
| FPS | 97.50 | 98.80 | 92.60 |
| Avg CPU | 41.00% | 48.00% | 41.00% |
| Avg GPU | 98.00% | 98.00% | 98.00% |
| Preset = Med | |||
| Avg FPS | 36.40 | 63.30 | 57.80 |
| FPS | 36.60 | 63.50 | 58.10 |
| Avg CPU | 27.00% | 38.00% | 43.00% |
| Avg GPU | 98.00% | 98.00% | 98.00% |
| Preset = High | |||
| Avg FPS | 21.00 | 36.80 | 35.40 |
| FPS | 21.10 | 37.30 | 35.70 |
| Avg CPU | 24.00% | 28.00% | 28.00% |
| Avg GPU | 98.00% | 98.00% | 98.00% |
| 製表：Benchlife.info x Autobuy | |||
| World of Warcraft：Legion, DirectX 11 | |||
| ASUS GTX750TI-PH-2GD5 | MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G | ASUS Dual-GTX-1050Ti-4G | |
| Preset = 5, High FXAA | |||
| Min FPS | 70. 00 |
100.00 | 111.00 |
| Avg FPS | 92.93 | 93.91 | 151.75 |
| Max FPS | 119.00 | 114.00 | 195.00 |
| Preset = 7, High FXAA | |||
| Min FPS | 51.00 | 75.00 | 83.00 |
| Avg FPS | 64.33 | 93.91 | 105.39 |
| Max FPS | 76.00 | 114.00 | 124.00 |
| Preset = 10, High FXAA | |||
| Min FPS | 31.00 | 55.00 | 52.00 |
| Avg FPS | 41.27 | 80.57 | 70.62 |
| Max FPS | 54.00 | 102.00 | 91.00 |
| 製表：Benchlife.info x Autobuy | |||
就目前三張顯示卡的測試數據來看，NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 仍具有相當大的優勢，這或許也是 NVIDIA 一直不想降價的原因。
相較於 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960，全新的 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 擁有 4GB 記憶體、HDMI 2.0 和 DisplayPort 1.