750 ti vs 960: GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960 Graphics cards Comparison

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960 Graphics cards Comparison

When choosing between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 960, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let’s find out the difference between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 960.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Check Price

GeForce GTX 960

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 960
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 120 Watt
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pins
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 960 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 960 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 960 are build with Maxwell architecture.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960 is 107 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 960 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • GeForce GTX 960 is 4 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960 is 2 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 20−22 35−40
ultra / 1080p 12−14 21−24
QHD / 1440p 6−7 16−18
4K / 2160p 5−6 10−11
low / 720p 40−45 60−65
medium / 1080p 24−27 40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p 30−35 55−60
ultra / 1080p 27−30 45−50
QHD / 1440p 10−12 35−40
4K / 2160p 8−9 18−20
low / 720p 65−70 100−110
medium / 1080p 35−40 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 960 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 230−240 250−260
medium / 768p 200−210 220−230
ultra / 1080p 120−130 180−190
QHD / 1440p 90−95 110−120
4K / 2160p 50−55 70−75
high / 768p 160−170 210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 50−55
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 960 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 100−110 110−120
ultra / 1080p 80−85 100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p 24−27 45−50
ultra / 1080p 21−24 40−45
QHD / 1440p 18−20 27−30
4K / 2160p 8−9 14−16
low / 720p 50−55 80−85
medium / 1080p 27−30 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p 30−35 60−65
ultra / 1080p 24−27 45−50
QHD / 1440p 16−18 27−30
4K / 2160p 27−30
low / 720p 120−130 180−190
medium / 1080p 70−75 110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p 30−35 60−65
ultra / 1080p 24−27 45−50
QHD / 1440p 14−16 30−35
4K / 2160p 12−14 24−27
low / 720p 65−70 100−110
medium / 1080p 35−40 65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p 100−110 140−150
medium / 768p 90−95 120−130
high / 1080p 40−45 70−75
ultra / 1080p 16−18 30−35
QHD / 1440p 7−8 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p 12−14 24−27
ultra / 1080p 10−11 20−22
QHD / 1440p 10−11 16−18
4K / 2160p 3−4 8−9
low / 720p 40−45 65−70
medium / 1080p 18−20 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p 120−130 130−140
medium / 1080p 110−120 120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 70−75 100−110
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p 14−16 24−27
ultra / 1080p 10−11 16−18
QHD / 1440p 1−2 10−11
4K / 2160p 1−2 7−8
low / 720p 35−40 65−70
medium / 1080p 21−24 35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p 70−75 130−140
medium / 768p 45−50 85−90
high / 1080p 24−27 45−50
ultra / 1080p 14−16 24−27
4K / 2160p 8−9 16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 40−45 50−55
high / 768p 55−60 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 960
Architecture Maxwell Maxwell
Code name GM107 GM206
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 18 February 2014 22 January 2015
Pipelines 640 1024
Core clock speed 1020 MHz 1127 MHz
Boost Clock 1085 MHz 1178 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million 2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 43. 40 72 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops 2,413 gflops
Length 5.7″ (14.5 cm) 9.5″ (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5.4 GB/s 7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s 112 GB/s
Shared memory
G-SYNC support +
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 5.1 6.4
OpenGL 4.4 4.4
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1. 1.126 1.1.126
CUDA + +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.25 kh/s 0.27 kh/s
CUDA cores 640 1024
Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm) 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options +
Multi monitor support 4 displays 4 displays
HDMI +
HDCP + +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal Internal
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
3D Vision Live +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 183 Mh/s 318 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0. 51 Gh/s 0.92 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 2.3 Mh/s 8 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 74.4 Sol/s 141.47 Sol/s
GameStream +
GeForce ShadowPlay +
GPU Boost 2.0
GameWorks +
Blu Ray 3D +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 660
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 660
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro K5200
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro K5200

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960: What is the difference?

41points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

46points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

EVGAEVGA Superclocked

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 960?

  • 60W lower TDP?
    60Wvs120W
  • 13°C lower load GPU temperature?
    62°Cvs75°C
  • 5°C lower idle GPU temperature?
    25°Cvs30°C
  • 1 more DVI outputs?
    2vs1
  • 96mm narrower?
    145mmvs241mm

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

  • 107MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1127MHzvs1020MHz
  • 1 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    2. 31 TFLOPSvs1.31 TFLOPS
  • 19.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    36.1 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s
  • 403MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1753MHzvs1350MHz
  • 1612MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    7012MHzvs5400MHz
  • 31.3 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    72.1 GTexels/svs40.8 GTexels/s
  • 0.8 newer version of DirectX?
    12vs11.2
  • 25.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    112GB/svs86.4GB/s

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

MSI Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX330

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

10. 0/10

2 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

9.3/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

2 votes

8.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

8.5/10

2 votes

8.7/10

3 votes

Performance

7.5/10

2 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Fan noise

5.5/10

2 votes

8.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

2 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1020MHz

1127MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1085MHz

1178MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

16.3 GPixel/s

36.1 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

1.31 TFLOPS

2.31 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

40.8 GTexels/s

72.1 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1350MHz

1753MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

5400MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

86.4GB/s

112GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    100%

  • GeForce GTX 960

    185%

Relative performance

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    100%

  • GeForce GTX 960

    141%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 750 Ti
60 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 960 .
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 960
41% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 960

The GeForce GTX 960 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (4 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 960
GPU Name GM107 (GM107-400-A2) vs GM206 (GM206-300-A1)
Fab Process 28 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 148 mm² vs 228 mm²
Transistors 1,870 million vs 2,940 million
Shaders 640 vs 1024
Compute Units 5 vs 8
Core clock 1020 MHz vs 1127 MHz
ROPs 16 vs 32
TMUs 40 vs 64

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 960
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 128 bit
Memory Speed 1350 MHz

5400 MHz effective
vs 1753 MHz

7012 MHz effective
Memory Size 2048 Mb vs 2048 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 960
TDP 60 watts vs 120 watts
Release Date 18 Feb 2014 vs 22 Jan 2015
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    16. 32 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 960

    36.10 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    40.80 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 960

    72.10 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    86.40 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 960

    112.20 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    1305.60 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 960

    2308.10 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    5610

  • GeForce GTX 960

    10380

Points (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    30

  • GeForce GTX 960

    47

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    23

  • GeForce GTX 960

    37

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    36

  • GeForce GTX 960

    34

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    34

  • GeForce GTX 960

    53

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon RX Vega 11
VS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon Vega 8
VS
GeForce GTX 960 GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 960 GeForce GTX 1050
VS
Radeon R9 380 Radeon R9 380 OEM
VS
Radeon R9 380 OEM Radeon R9 285

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

0026

  • 13°C lower GPU temperature during boot?
    62°C vs 75°C
  • 5°C lower GPU idle temperature?
    25°C vs 30°C
  • 1 more DVI outputs?
    2 vs 1
  • 96mm narrower?
    145mm vs 241mm
    • GPU frequency 107MHz higher?
      1127MHz vs 1020MHz
    • 1 TFLOPS over FLOPS?
      2.31 TFLOPS vs 1.31 TFLOPS
    • 19.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      36.1 GPixel/s vs 16.3 GPixel/s
    • 403MHz faster memory speed?
      1753MHz vs 1350MHz
    • 1612MHz higher effective clock speed?
      7012MHz vs 5400MHz
    • 31.3 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? 9Is 0024 72.1 GTexels/s vs 40.8 GTexels/s
    • 0.8 a newer version of DirectX? more memory bandwidth?
      112GB/s vs 86. 4GB/s

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 550

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 550

    0003

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    MSI Radeon RX 580

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    GeForce TX

    Nvidia0003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon Vega 8

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    AMD Radeon RX 6400

    Nvidia GeForce GTX

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 6400

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 9003 9003

    0004 AMD Radeon RX 570

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    AMD Radeon Vega 8

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX150

    Price Comparison

    User Reviews

    Overall Rating

    Nvidia GeForce 7 Ti0 70003

    2 reviews of users

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    10. 0243 /10

    2 Reviews of users

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 9000 9. 3 User reviews

    Features

    Value for money

    10.0 /10

    2 votes

    8.3 /10

    300 040004 Games

    8.5 /10

    2 VOTES

    8.7 /10

    3 Votes

    7.5 /10

    2 VOTES

    9000 9000 9000 Vototes

    Fan noise

    5.5 /10

    2 Votes

    8.0 /10

    3 VOTES

    Reliability

    10.0 /10 9000 9000 2 VOTES 9000

    9000 9000 10.0 9.0 9.0 /10

    3 votes

    Performance

    1.GPU clock speed

    1020MHz

    1127MHz

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    1085MHz

    1178MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel speed

    16.3GPixel/s

    36.1 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    1.31 TFLOPS

    2.31 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    40.8 GTexels/s

    72.1 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1350MHz

    1753MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    5400MHz

    7012MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    86.4GB/s

    112GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4. memory bus width

    128bit

    128bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5. GDDR memory versions

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5.GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

    More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI version 3

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    1241MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    1020MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    GPU memory frequency

    This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

    1753MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326. 6 MHz

    1350MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    FLOPS

    A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

    2.43TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    1.4TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    Turbo GPU

    If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
    Show all

    1304MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    1085MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375. 8 MHz

    Texture size

    A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
    Show all

    79.4 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    40.8 GTexels/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    86.4GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    Effective memory speed

    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
    Show all

    7012MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984. 5 MHz

    5400MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    RAM

    4 GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    2GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    GDDR Memory Versions

    Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
    Show all

    5

    Average: 4.5

    5

    Average: 4.5

    Memory bus width

    A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
    Show all

    128bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    128bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    Heat dissipation (TDP)

    Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
    Show all

    120W

    Average: 140.4W

    60W

    Average: 140.4W

    Process

    The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    Number of transistors

    The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

    2940 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    1870 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    PCIe version

    Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
    Show all

    3

    Mean: 2. 8

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    Width

    244mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    145mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    Height

    114mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    111mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    DirectX

    Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    12

    max 12. 2

    Average: 11.1

    OpenCL version

    Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
    Show all

    1.2

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    3

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    opengl version

    Later versions provide better game graphics

    4.5

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    4.6

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    Shader model version

    6. 4

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    5.1

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    version VULKAN

    1.1

    1.3

    version CUDA

    is

    5

    HDMI Output HDMI Availability HDMI allows you to connect devices with HDMI ports or mini-hdmi. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
    Full display

    Yes

    Yes

    DisplayPort

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

    3

    Average: 2

    Average: 2

    DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI

    2

    Mean: 1. 4

    2

    Mean: 1.4

    HDMI

    Yes

    Yes

    Passmark score

    5914

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3852

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

    48920

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    30722

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    6565

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3942

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

    7758

    max 49575

    Average: 11859. 1

    4208

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score

    10553

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    5270

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    3DMark Vantage Performance score

    30136

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    21176

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

    304643

    max 533357

    Average: 372425. 7

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    Unigine Heaven 4.0 score

    849

    max 4818

    Average: 1291.1

    530

    max 4818

    Average: 1291.1

    Octane Render test score OctaneBench

    46

    max 125

    Average: 47.1

    34

    max 125

    Average: 47.1

    Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GTX 750 video cards in games

    This review will examine in detail the balance of performance and technical specifications of two popular entry-level graphics accelerators from Nvidia: GTX 750 Ti vs GTX 750. These are the first products of the eminent manufacturer, which relate to the Maxwell architecture. Their main feature is low power consumption. But at the same time, they are all right with speed.

    What niche do these graphics solutions belong to? But the main feature of these solutions is a high degree of energy efficiency. For normal operation of such a graphics accelerator, a power supply unit with a power of only 300 watts is enough. Also, the power supply of the basic modifications of these graphics accelerators is carried out only through the PCI Express 16X connector, there is no need to connect any additional power connectors to the printed circuit board of the video card. Therefore, the main niche of these graphics accelerators is compact systems with increased requirements for computer energy efficiency and an acceptable level of performance of the graphics subsystem. But at the same time, it is not uncommon to find these products in full-sized entry-level PCs.

    It is on the niche of various types of entry-level gaming personal computers that these graphic accelerators are oriented.

    Video Card Specifications

    These semiconductor chips are manufactured using the 28nm process technology. Oriented to use 1 or 2 GB of RAM standard «GDDR5». The clock frequencies of the processors of these video cards are identical — 1020-1085 MHz. The presence of proprietary GPU Boost technology allows the chips to change their frequency depending on the degree of heating and the level of complexity of the task being performed at the current time. This improves the power consumption of the graphics accelerator. Both of these products are based on an architecture codenamed «Maxwell». Its key difference from the solutions of the previous generation based on the Kepler architecture is the redesigned logic control blocks and increased cache sizes. All this together allowed the manufacturer to achieve a significant increase in productivity, combined with a reduction in electrical energy consumption.

    Performance level of standard modifications

    Of course, various synthetic tests show a fairly good level of performance in terms of points for these products. But the real level of performance can be seen only in toys. The main indicator in this case is the number of frames per second. It is these figures for 4 fairly recent gaming applications that are shown in Table 1. All these figures are valid for the maximum settings mode and a resolution of 1920×1080. In all toys, feed «Metro: Last Light», the number of frames per second is sufficient for comfortable gameplay. But in Metro: Last Light, you will have to reduce the parameters of the displayed image to achieve an acceptable value of 30 frames per second or more.

    Below is a table showing the frames per second in games for the GTX 750 Ti and GTX 750.

    EALS0004 It is most interesting to compare GTX 750 Ti vs GTX 750 from the point of view of overclocking potential. Here it is necessary to note one important feature: there are modifications of video cards with the prefix «Ti», which, unlike the basic version, still have an additional power connector. Even in the usual version, overclocking the «750 Ti» to the frequency range of 1050-1150 MHz allows you to get an increase of 15-20 percent. Well, if you use a model of the same video adapter, but with improved power supply, you can even get an increase in performance up to 30 percent in some cases.

    Performance ratio with GeForce 560Ti

    Models below the GTX 560 Ti of the previous generation of graphics accelerators from Nvidia are generally inappropriate to compare with these new products. They lose both in terms of power consumption and performance. If we compare the GTX 560 Ti vs GTX 750 Ti, then even in this case, the advantage will be on the side of a budget card based on a more progressive architecture. The difference in speed will be about 3-5 percent. Only here the energy efficiency in this case will differ significantly.

    Comparison with GeForce GTX 660 and GTX 650Ti

    Comparison between GTX 650 Ti vs GTX 750 shows that they are approximately the same level of performance. But at the same time, energy efficiency is on the side of a fresher product. The difference between them in this regard can reach 30-40 watts. A similar situation is obtained when comparing the GTX 660 vs GTX 750 Ti. The performance level in this case is also comparable, but the power consumption is several times less for a more recent video card. Therefore, in the eyes of a potential buyer, fresh solutions look more preferable.

    The first representatives of the Maxwell architecture against the background of more recent NVidia graphic accelerators

    It is difficult to compare the GTX 750 Ti vs the GTX 950. The difference in cost between these solutions is significant and amounts to about $50. At the same time, the more recent card is a trimmed modification of the GTX 960 (and this is definitely a device of the middle, not the budget class). The difference in performance in this case can reach 40-50 percent. Also, a good overclocking potential of a more recent solution can increase these numbers even more.

    AMD competitors

    The review of entry-level video cards will not be complete if you lose sight of AMD solutions. The direct competitors of the heroes of this review are the «Radeons» of the R7-260, R7-260X, R7-265 and R9-270 models. All these graphics cards have almost the same cost and approximately the same level of performance.

    It is most interesting to compare R9 270X vs GTX 750 Ti. In this case, the video card from AMD was initially positioned even as a middle-class solution. At the same time, the frequency of the GPU is much lower — only 950 MHz. As noted earlier, the NVIDIA graphics accelerator has a frequency in the range from 1020 to 1085 MHz, and this value varies depending on the degree of heating of the GPU and the level of complexity of the task being solved at that moment in time. The thermal package is much higher for the AMD solution. It also requires an additional power connector. But the most interesting parameter in this case is the width of the RAM bus, which R9 has-270 equals 256 bits versus 128 bits for the GTX 750 Ti. Alas, in this case, the solution from Nvidia loses much to its direct competitor in terms of performance and speed. The situation is similar with R7-265. They simply leave no chance for the GTX — 750 Ti, all the same 256 bits of the RAM bus. Also, the presence of additional power and lower clock frequencies indicates that solutions from AMD can also be overclocked. Therefore, from the standpoint of performance, the products of the latter company look more preferable. But as part of compact PCs with increased requirements for their power consumption, it is more reasonable to use Nvidia solutions.

    Cost

    The base version of the GTX 750 is priced at $120. In reality, you can find the most affordable video adapters of this model for 135-140 dollars. A more advanced modification is estimated by the manufacturer at $149. In reality, you can buy such a product for 160-170 dollars. If in the first case such a price is justified and looks very, very attractive against the background of competitors, then the GTX 750 Ti is not so rosy. By reducing the cost of R9270 in the competing camp up to the same level, the acquisition of the latter looks preferable. Of course, his energy efficiency will be weaker, but in terms of performance, he will leave far behind any of the heroes of this review. Well, taking into account the low clock frequency and high overclocking potential of this solution, the choice becomes more than obvious — R9 270.

    Reviews

    When comparing the GeForce GTX 750 vs GTX 750 Ti, users highlight the improved specifications of the latter solution. It has better overclocking potential, and the number of blocks involved in the work is larger, and the speed is higher. In the segment of compact entry-level systems, these video adapters are unrivaled.

    2024 © All rights reserved

    No.

    Personnel per second for GTX 750

    1.

    SNIPER ELITEV2

    6 9000

    9000

    9