Nvidia GTX 750-Ti vs 970
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,102,944 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
809,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Gigabyte(1458 367A)
Worst Bench: 45% Asus(1043 8508)
Poor: 45%
Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 106th / 688
293,396 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 20% EVGA(3842 3757)
Worst Bench: 17% Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
Poor: 17%
Great: 20%
SPEED RANK: 201st / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
50. 2 % | Hugely faster effective speed. +176% |
18.2 % |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
61.3 fps | Hugely better lighting effects. +184% |
21.6 fps | |||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
71.5 fps | Hugely better reflection handling. +276% |
19 fps | |||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
67.8 fps | Hugely faster multi rendering. +169% |
25.2 fps | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
62. 2 fps | Hugely faster NBody calculation. +167% |
23.3 fps |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
69 fps | Hugely better peak lighting effects. +183% |
24.4 fps | |||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
93.1 fps | Hugely better peak reflection handling. +268% |
25.3 fps | |||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
71.2 fps | Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +162% |
27.2 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
67. 6 fps | Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. +162% |
25.8 fps |
CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
156 Fps | Much Better CSGO Fps. +42% |
110 Fps | |||
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
94 Fps | Hugely Better Fortnite Fps. +107% |
45 Fps | |||
PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
63 Fps | Hugely Better PUBG Fps. +91% |
33 Fps | |||
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
53 Fps | Much Better GTAV Fps. +47% |
36 Fps | |||
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
156 Fps | Much Better LoL Fps. +44% |
109 Fps | |||
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
97 Fps | Hugely Better Overwatch Fps. +90% |
51 Fps | |||
BF1 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
62 Fps | Much Better BF1 Fps. +63% |
38 Fps | |||
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
48 Fps | Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +92% |
25 Fps | |||
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
189 Fps | Much Better Minecraft Fps. +48% |
128 Fps | |||
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
121 Fps | Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps. +125% |
54 Fps | |||
WoW Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
63 Fps | Much Better WoW Fps. +38% |
46 Fps | |||
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
97 Fps | Hugely Better WoT Fps. +113% |
46 Fps |
Market Share
Based on 55,917,155 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
1.15 % | Hugely higher market share. +140% |
0. 48 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
35 % | 55.4 % | Much better value. +58% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
69 % | More popular. +11% |
62 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$340 | $78 | Much cheaper. +77% |
Age Newest |
97 Months | Slightly more recent. +7% |
104 Months | |||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
69.7 fps | Hugely better peak texture detail. +199% |
23.3 fps | |||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
59.8 fps | Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +216% |
18.9 fps | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
62.4 fps | Hugely better texture detail. +196% |
21.1 fps | |||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
54 fps | Hugely faster complex splatting. +225% |
16.6 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 970 Graphics cards Comparison
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 970. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 970. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Check Price
GeForce GTX 970
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 148 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 970 has 146% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 970 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 970 are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 970 is 30 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 970 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 970 is 5 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 970 is 2 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Far Cry 5 is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Fortnite is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Forza Horizon 4 is 148% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Metro Exodus is 168% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 970 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970 in World of Tanks is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 970 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 18 February 2014 | 19 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1664 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43. 40 | 109 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
Length | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) | 10.5″ (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1. 1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.25 kh/s | 0.48 kh/s |
CUDA cores | 640 | 1664 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | 4 displays |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
3D Gaming | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
3D Vision Live | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 183 Mh/s | 478 Mh/s |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 0.
|