Intel Core i9-7980XE vs Intel Core i9-9980XE: What is the difference?
53points
Intel Core i9-7980XE
64points
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i9-7980XE
Intel Core i9-9980XE
Why is Intel Core i9-7980XE better than Intel Core i9-9980XE?
- Has an unlocked multiplier?
- Has NX bit?
- 1 newer Turbo Boost version?
3vs2
Why is Intel Core i9-9980XE better than Intel Core i9-7980XE?
- 15.38% faster CPU speed?
18 x 3GHzvs18 x 2.6GHz - 576KB bigger L1 cache?
1152KBvs576KB - 0.07MB/core more L3 cache per core?
1.38MB/corevs1.3MB/core
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-10980XE
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-10980XE
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
Intel Core i7-4960X
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD A6-7480
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 3700
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
Intel Core i5-8365U
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i9-7980XE
0 User reviews
Intel Core i9-7980XE
0. 0/10
0 User reviews
Intel Core i9-9980XE
1 User reviews
Intel Core i9-9980XE
10.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
18 x 2.6GHz
18 x 3GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.4GHz
4.4GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✖Intel Core i9-9980XE
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
24.7MB
24.75MB
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
1152KB
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.3MB/core
1.38MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
85.3GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i9-7980XE
✖Intel Core i9-9980XE
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9980XE)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device.
For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9980XE)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance.
(Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
104.3seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
264.3seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(Intel Core i9-9980XE)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i9-7980XE
✖Intel Core i9-9980XE
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9980XE)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel i9-9980XE Review: Disappointing OC Headroom, But Strong Stock Performance | GamersNexus
The 9900K was not directly comparable to the 8086K due to differences in the IHS, CPU package, die itself, and core count change.
The 9980XE also changes the IHS, but the fact remains that it is still an updated 7980XE. It’s still 18 cores, it’s the same architecture, it overclocks the same way. We found the 9980XE so thermally constrained in initial benchmarking that it could not pass even our delidded 7980XE’s overclock results. The 9980XE ran into thermal walls long before it could touch the clocks held by our 7980XE, even when running on a simple 280mm Kraken X62 CLC. We decided to test each CPU under the same load scenario, using a real-world workload of Blender 2.79 with the GN Logo animation test and AVX instructions, resulting in 43A down the EPS12V rails at 4.6GHz or roughly 34A at 4.4GHz. We ran two configurations: 4.4GHz and 1.15V, which was stable on both CPUs, and 4.6GHz and 1.24V with a 30x mesh and 1.1VMesh.
Averaged Thermal Results – Blender 2.79
Here are the results. The 9980XE at 4.4GHz and 1.15V operated an average core temperature of 75 degrees, adjusted for ambient but not delta T over ambient.
The same exact configuration on our delidded and Conductonaut-ified 7980XE landed a 67-degree average core temperature. That might not sound like a lot, but an extra 9 degrees grants a lot more thermal headroom for overclocking. More critically, however, is the core-to-core delta. We’ll look at that next. The package temperature was 86 degrees for the 9980XE under these settings, with liquid at 39 degrees. For the 7980XE, we measured 74 degrees package temperature and 38 degrees liquid temperature.
Moving on to the 4.6GHz test, the 7980XE had zero issues and managed to hold at 77 degrees average core temperature, with the package temperature at 88 degrees. The 7980XE passed the 30-minute test without issue. The 9980XE under these conditions failed the test after 20 minutes, but at steady state, we measured 92-degree average core temperatures and 104-degree package temperatures, with liquid at 42 degrees. The 7980XE with liquid metal ends up 15 degrees cooler on average while maintaining the overclock without a thermal shutdown.
If we needed to, the 7980XE could go up to 1.26 or 1.27V to stabilize an overclock, whereas the 9980XE has no more voltage headroom to stabilize the clocks. That’s the big issue. The 9980XE is running out of thermal runway before it can actually stretch its legs.
Min/Max Thermal Results – Blender 2.79
Here are the minimum and maximum core temperatures for each CPU. The 7980XE at 4.4GHz tested at 77 degrees peak core temperature and 52 degrees for its coolest core. The delta is 25 degrees. For the 9980XE, the core-to-core difference was 88 degrees to 57 degrees, for a 31-degree delta. Even more troublesome than that is that at 88 degrees, our hottest cores are going to soon begin limiting overclocking headroom by way of thermal runway.
The 4.6GHz is even worse for the 9980XE, which hit TjMax on several cores and began throttling at around 104-105 degrees Celsius. The lowest core temperature was 65 degrees, for a delta of 39 degrees from the hottest to the coolest core.
If we split the difference and had every core closer to 80 degrees, we’d have enough headroom here to push high clocks on the 9980XE. Unfortunately, the hottest 5 cores are hitting in the 100s, eliminating any ability to push a bigger OC without stepping up to impractical cooling solutions. That’s perfectly fine for XOCing or chilled overclocking, but not great for use in a normal system. Our 7980XE with liquid metal would afford enthusiasts much more room to push clocks.
Power Testing
Overclocking leads naturally into power. For power consumption tests, we’re using a slew of applications that cover each aspect of the CPU:
- Blender 2.79 represents a realistic, heavy AVX workload. We’re using the GN Logo render test for this, which uses ray tracing and reflections to strain the CPU with AVX instructions.
- Cinebench is used as a standardized benchmark for quick power numbers under multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.
- TimeSpy Extreme Physics shows maximum potential CPU load during a physics-intensive gaming workload.
- Handbrake shows power consumption during video transcodes.
Cinebench Power Consumption Benchmark
Cinebench planted the i9-9980XE at 271W power consumption under stock conditions, true for both MCE off and MCE Auto on the Gigabyte X299 Gaming 9 motherboard. As most boards will operate under these conditions, this is an accurate representation of usage sans stricter configurations. The i9-7980XE pushed about 228W stock, or 500W when overclocked to 4.6GHz and 1.25V. For comparison, lower power consumption chips include the 2990WX at 199W and 9900K at 156W with turbo durations ignored, or 106W with them acknowledged.
Cinebench CPU Benchmark Results
Just for comparison, let’s interrupt power results momentarily and look at the Cinebench performance results. The 2990WX landed at around 4990 points while consuming about 200W at the EPS12V cables; meanwhile, the 9980XE stock used about 271W and output a score of 3716 in Cinebench R15. Overclocking the 7980XE gets it closer to the 2990WX, operating at 4500 points with a 4.
6GHz core clock. The 9980XE disappoints and maxes-out at 4225 points with its 4.4GHz thermally-constrained overclock. This is partially a chip quality limitation, in theory, but most delidded 7980XEs would not have issues with higher clocks. We could have pushed frequency a little higher on the 9980XE in Cinebench, but only because it’s a 20-second benchmark. Our overclocking guidance for reviews mandates that the OC survive a minimum of a 20-minute Blender run, making 20-second Cinebench survival irrelevant. This overclocking limitation is due to core-to-core deltas, where the 9980XE runs some cores in the 90s and some in the 60s and 70s. The CPU is only as good as its hottest core, at which point it’ll be constrained by that core. Note here that the 9980XE does have a significant advantage over the 7980XE when stock with thanks to the new frequency boost, so it’s doing better where it should be better. Stock-to-stock, it is functionally a pre-overclocked 7980XE, kind of like the RX 580 to the RX 480.
Blender 2.79 CPU Power Consumption Benchmark
With Blender 2.79, we measured power consumption of the i9-9900K at 90W when Turbo limitations were enforced, or 152W when they were not. The 2990WX operated at about 191W under stock conditions. The i9-7980XE stock CPU consumed about 214W here, with the stock 7960X and 9980XE nearby. The 7980XE with a 4.6GHz overclock and 1.25V Vcore pulled 548 Watts down the EPS12V cables, yet was able to sustain its overclock better than the soldered 9980XE.
Blender 2.79 CPU Benchmark Results
Using GN’s in-house Blender animation benchmarks, we found the following results:
The Intel i9-9980XE 18C CPU is right around where the 7980XE performs for the GN Monkey Head stress test, at about 11.5 minutes for both CPUs. The Splash benchmark puts them at 12.1 minutes for the 7980XE and 11.8 minutes for the 9980XE, illustrating that threads dominate in this type of workload, and they’re the same thread-count CPUs. The GN Logo benchmark is an AVX-intensive load with ray tracing, and puts the 7980XE at 14 minutes stock, or 13.
8 minutes for the 9980XE stock CPU. The 4.6GHz 7980XE finishes its renders in 9 to 10 minutes, making it one of the most impressive chips we’ve worked with when strictly considering tweaking headroom with a delid. The 7980XE is a proven performer in these tests. The 4.4GHz 9980XE scales as you’d expect it, landing between the results. As for the 2990WX, the AMD workstation flagship ends up at 11 minutes for the monkey render and splash render, and just under 10 minutes for the GN render. AMD does well in tile-based rendering applications like Blender and Cinebench.
TimeSpy Extreme Power Consumption Benchmark
TimeSpy Extreme gives us a workload similar to heavy physics loads in games. For this one, we measured the 7980XE at about 161W down the EPS12V cables, with the 9980XE at about 170W. No meaningful difference for these results, the 2990WX runs at 127W, but also gets completely trounced in this benchmark, so its lower power consumption is coupled with significantly lower performance.
The 7980XE overclocked ends up at 324W, with the 7960X at slightly lower voltage at 294W. The 7960X and 7980XE mostly draw equivalent power when matched for clocks and voltages, so this stack makes sense. The 9980XE scales roughly equivalently to the 7980XE.
Handbrake Power Consumption
Finally, for Handbrake, we saw the 7980XE and 9980XE both at around 168W down the EPS12V cables, with overclocks pushing the 7980XE to nearly 300W. The 2990WX runs at 122W, but again loses hard in this particular test.
Handbrake Results
In order to really leverage the 2990WX for our h364 transcode workload, you’d need to run two processes in parallel to crunch different videos. These results for the newest Handbrake version while transcoding with h364 and converting a 4K video to a 1080p video with a High profile, transcoding down to 25Mbps at 60FPS. The Intel CPUs are pegged to 100% utilization, as they should be, throughout this test. This allows Intel to chart-top with a 15.
7-minute completion time when the 7980XE is overclocked to 4.6GHz. The 7960X at the same frequency posts a 16.2-minute time, showing that the extra 4 threads really don’t impact a whole lot. The stock 9980XE marginally outperforms the stock 7980XE, at 17.7 minutes versus 18 minutes. The 7960X is at 18.5 minutes. Both of these previous two facts illustrate that frequency matters for this particular transcode, as we’re potentially becoming partially bound by the speed. The 2990WX ends up around where the 9900K stock CPU sits, at roughly 21 minutes completion time. Looking more carefully at the testing, the 2990WX is only engaged on about 60-67% of its threads at any given time, showing that it is becoming bound by more heavily single-threaded workloads during the transcode process. In order to be leveraged in this specific workload, you’d want to queue up two simultaneous transcodes, if you have multiple to do at once, to stretch the legs of Threadripper. Unfortunately, if you only want to transcode one video with the specific settings we used, it would appear that Amdahl’s Law prevails and the higher IPC CPUs perform best.
Relating to the previous chart, the 2990WX’s power consumption advantage coincides with its underutilization of resources.
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 CPU Benchmark
Running Adobe Premiere CC 2019 to render a GN aroll+broll video, with no charts whatsoever, we found that the 9900K without IGP acceleration completes the render in about 24.4 minutes, with the 9980XE leading handily at 16.5 minutes. This is a total render time reduction of 32%. IGP acceleration can do a lot for Intel’s desktop CPUs, but we’ve experienced so many IGP-specific Premiere crashes in-house that we can see the value to brute-forcing with an HEDT CPU. In this instance, the IGP pushes the 9900K up to 21 minutes, which is good performance considering the price difference between the next best CPU on the chart. We have previous tests showing what specific scenarios benefit QuickSync in video encoding, if you’re curious to learn more about when an IGP does and doesn’t help.
Photoshop CPU Benchmarks
Photoshop testing uses the Puget benchmark suite and, like Premiere, uses software from Adobe.
Photoshop appears to also like high frequency CPUs as a primary spec, with core count coming in second. The i9-9900K outperforms both the 9980XE and 2990WX in photo merging, filters, and general image processing like scaling, transforms, magic wand, gradient and fill bucket applications, and saving. The 9980XE scores ahead of the 2990WX by a large margin, with a 20% faster photo merge score and 34% faster application of filters.
The 9980XE does well here, but if Photoshop is the only game in town for you, it may be better to consider the Intel i9-9900K or similar high-frequency CPU. We can also see that the GPU tests become limited by CPU frequency, where the 9900K pushes ahead.
Photoshop Core Utilization
If you’re curious why the Photoshop results favor the cheapest CPU on the benchmark, this chart shows CPU utilization averaged across all cores during the benchmark. You’re looking at the 9980XE and 2990WX, where the higher frequency 9980XE sees higher engagement. Some of this likely comes down to how Windows is scheduling threads, as we know that AMD fares much better in Linux, but the rest comes down to how Adobe’s software really likes higher frequency CPUs.
The 9980XE never quite averages at 100% load, but spikes up into the 90s during some of the more balanced workloads.
9980XE Game Benchmarks – Assassin’s Creed: Origins
Assassin’s Creed: Origins is up next, run at medium settings for both 1080p and 1440p resolutions. At 1080p/medium, Assassin’s Creed positions the 7980XE at 4.6GHz ahead of the 9980XE at 4.4GHz, albeit marginally, and has the 9980XE ahead of the 7960X at 4.6GHz. Assassin’s Creed makes reasonable usage of the higher core count CPUs, but still clearly favors something more reasonably positioned, like the 8700K or 9900K. If one wanted to game on the 9980XE, it is clearly well-suited for gaming with at least this application, it’s just that pure gaming PCs are still best-suited by normal desktop-class CPUs, not HEDT CPUs. The 2990WX is also technically capable of gaming, but really isn’t something you should be buying just for games. This should surprise no one, at this point. With Game Mode enabled, the low-end framerate significantly improves, jumping to 56FPS for 0.
1% lows from 17FPS 0.1% lows with all cores enabled. Assassin’s Creed just doesn’t know what to do with the threads, struggles with latencies, and needs higher frequency.
1440p shows the same type of scaling, just drawn back from GPU constraints. The 9980XE at 4.4GHz and 7980XE at 4.6GHz are roughly tied, at this point, with both results well inside of our margin of error. They won’t push any higher without a major frequency jump. If we highlight both 9900K results, you’ll see where GPU limitations cap total performance. The 9900K runs at 4.7GHz all-core up top, and even when pushed to 5.2GHz, the results are equivalent. They are within margin of error. This is the performance limitation for 1440p.
9980XE Game Benchmarks – CIV VI
Civilization turn time testing is next. This game likes frequency, but also benefits from additional cores in a way that most games don’t. The 7980XE chart-tops here, though is technically within error margins of the 5.2GHz 8C 9900K. Both take a little over 11 seconds per AI turn, multiplied across 5 AI.
The 9980XE at 4.4GHz is next, at 11.6 seconds consistently, with the 7960X at 4.6GHz within margin of error. There’s really no meaningful difference in any of the top half of results, from the 9980XE stock CPU and up.
9980XE Game Benchmarks – Far Cry 5
Far Cry really likes frequency as well, but it likes threads enough that the i5 CPUs struggle from low-end frametime performance, creating more visual stuttering during high framerate gameplay. The i7 CPUs do well to counter this. As for the 9980XE, the stock i9 lands just ahead of the stock 7980XE, at 115FPS and 112FPS, respectively. The overclocked 9980XE at 4.4GHz ends up around the 4.6GHz 7900X, and the 7980XE at 4.6GHz ends up at 146FPS AVG.
1440p posts, again, the same kind of scaling, it’s just truncated at the top. The 7980XE at 4.6GHz does the best among the HCC CPUs, at 138FPS AVG. It’s still more sensible to purchase other CPUs for pure gaming, but this one does fine here. The 9980XE stock CPU pushes 114FPS AVG, outperforming the 7980XE marginally and by the margin of frequency advantage.
9980XE Game Benchmarks – F1 2018
Testing F1 2018 at 1080p/High puts the 7980XE at 4.6GHz at the top of the charts, even ahead of the 9900K at 5.2GHz. The stock 7980XE and stock 9980XE land next to each other, with the 9980XE ahead by margins parallel to its frequency increase. Overclocking the 9980XE to 4.4GHz gets it to around where 5GHz 6C CPUs perform, like the 8600K or 9600K. It’s good enough, but again, it’s just easier to buy a more suitable CPU for pure gaming applications. As for the 2990WX, game mod eplants that one at around R7 1700 performance levels.
At 1440p, we hit a performance wall with the GPU at about 240FPS, illustrated by the 9900K and overclocked 7980XE tying at the top. The 9980XE overclock at 4.4GHz lands about where the similarly clocked 7900X and 9600K land, again, with no favor shown toward the high core-count devices.
Conclusion: i9-9980XE vs. 7980XE & 2990WX
We see the i9-9980XE as serving two primary audiences while failing a third.
We’ll start with the negative: For the overclocking enthusiast who might enjoy OCing under reasonable cooling solutions (not DICE or LN2), we’d still recommend the i9-7980XE over the 9980XE, but only if coupled alongside a delidder and some Conductonaut. For anyone using DICE or LN2, the 9980XE theoretically has higher overall silicon quality and frequency capabilities, it’s just that it’s thermally constrained under ‘normal’ coolers.
The first best-served audience is that which prefers to use CPUs fully stock, without any modifications whatsoever. In this regard, the 9980XE is superior to the original 7980XE, if only because it’s functionally pre-overclocked. It is also superior in its thermal interface when compared to the stock Dow Corning paste of the 7980XE, and overclocking headroom is of no consequence to the stock user. That then puts the stock user up to the choice of considering AMD alternatives, at which point we’d simply point you toward the charts. The 2990WX is cheaper and potentially better suited for tile-based rendering applications like Blender, but faces clock deficiencies in applications like Premiere or Photoshop (although in those, a “cheap” 9900K might make more sense than the 9980XE or 2990WX).
Finally, for the LN2 or DICE user, the 9980XE may offer more overclocking headroom when under extreme cooling solutions. Our friends in the XOC community seem to have indicated as such, anyway.
Editorial, Testing: Steve Burke
Testing: Patrick Lathan
Video: Andrew Coleman
Intel Core i9 9980XE vs i9 7980XE: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 9980XE
Intel Core i9 7980XE
We compared two 18-core desktop CPUs: the 3.0 GHz Intel Core i9 9980XE against the 2.6 GHz i9 7980XE. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i9 9980XE
59
Core i9 7980XE
61
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i9 9980XE
90
Core i9 7980XE
87
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i9 9980XE
43
Core i9 7980XE
39
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i9 9980XE
69
Core i9 7980XE
69
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 7980XE and 9980XE
Advantages of Intel Core i9 9980XE
- Newer — released 1-year later
- 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Advantages of Intel Core i9 7980XE
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i9 9980XE
1110
Core i9 7980XE
+14%
1270
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 9980XE
17866
Core i9 7980XE
+1%
18086
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i9 9980XE
+4%
2552
Core i9 7980XE
2456
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i9 9980XE
+8%
31922
Core i9 7980XE
29556
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i9 9980XE
1119
Core i9 7980XE
+1%
1126
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 9980XE
+16%
17002
Core i9 7980XE
14697
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 9980XE and i9 7980XE
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | October 8, 2018 | September 25, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Skylake | Skylake |
| Model number | i9-9980XE | i9-7980XE |
| Socket | LGA-2066 | LGA-2066 |
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
Performance
| Cores | 18 | 18 |
| Threads | 36 | 36 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 0 GHz |
2.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 30x | 26x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 25MB (shared) | 25MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 165 W | 165 W |
| Max. temperature | 84°C | 94°C |
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
4 | 4 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 79.47 GB/s | 79.47 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| Official site | Intel Core i9 9980XE official page | Intel Core i9 7980XE official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 44 | 44 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i9 9980XE
1 (50%)
Core i9 7980XE
1 (50%)
Total votes: 2
ompetitors
1.
Core i9 7980XE or Ryzen 9 5950X
2.
Core i9 7980XE or Core i9 12900K
So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i9 7980XE or i9 9980XE?
Name
Message
Promotion
Intel Core i9 9980XE vs i9 7980XE:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 9980XE
Intel Core i9 7980XE
Which is better: Intel Core i9 9980XE at 3.0 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.4) or i9 7980XE at 2.6 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.2)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 18-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i9 9980xe
59
Core i9 7980XE
61
Multi -flow performance
Tests in the benchmark, where all nuclei 9 are involved80XE and 9980XE
Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 9980XE
- Launched 1 year later than rival
- 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 7980XE
- More than 10°C higher maximum operating temperature
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i9 9980XE
1110
Core i9 7980XE
+14%
1270
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i9 9980XE
17866
Core i9 7980XE
+1%
18086
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i9 9980XE
+4%
2552
Core i9 7980XE
2456
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i9 9980XE
+8%
31922
Core i9 7980XE
29556
Geekbench 5 (Single Core)
Core i9 9980XE
1119
Core i9 7980XE
+1%
1126
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i9 9980XE
+16%
17002
Core i9 7980XE
14697
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i99980XE and i9 7980XE
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | October 8, 2018 | September 25, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Skylake | Skylake |
| Model number | i9-9980XE | i9-7980XE |
| Socket | LGA-2066 | LGA-2066 |
| Integrated graphics | No | No |
Capacity
| Number of cores | 18 | 18 |
| Number of threads | 36 | 36 |
| Frequency | 3. 0 GHz |
2.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 30x | 26x |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 1MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 25MB (shared) | 25MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Energy consumption
| Process technology | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165W | 165 W |
| Critical temperature | 84°C | 94°C |
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
Max. size |
128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 4 | 4 |
| Max. bandwidth | 79.47 GB/s | 79.47 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i9 9980XE | Site Intel Core i9 7980XE |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 44 | 44 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i9 9980XE
1 (50%)
Core i9 7980XE
1 (50%)
Total votes: 2
Competitors
1.
Core i9 7980XE and Ryzen 9 5950X
2.
Core i9 7980XE and Core i9 12900K
What will you choose: Intel Core i9 7980XE or i9 9980XE?
Name
Message
Intel Core i9-7980XE vs Intel Core i
3 vs 2
Why is Intel Core i9-9980XE better than Intel Core i9-7980XE?
- 15.38% faster CPU speed?
18 x 3GHz vs 18 x 2.6GHz - 576KB more L1 cache?
1152KB vs 576KB - 0.07MB/core more L3 cache per core?
1.38MB/core vs 1.3MB/core
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-10980XE
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
Intel Core i9-10980XE
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
Intel Core i7-4960X
Intel Core i9-9980xe
VS
Intel Core i9-12900k
Intel Core i9-7980xe
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 3950x
Intel Core
9000
ENTEL CORE CORE CORE.
I
INTEL CORE i9-7980xe
VS
Intel Core i9-9900k
Intel Core i9-9980xe
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 5950x
Intel Core I9-7980XE
9000 2 3900X
AMD RYZEN 9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Intel Core i9-7980xe
VS
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-9980XE
VS
AMD A6-7480
0XE
9000 VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
AMD
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 3700
Intel Core i9-7980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Intel Core i9-9980XE
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i9-7980XE
VS
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i9-9980xe
VS
Intel Core i5-8365U
Classes
TI
Intel Core i9-7980XE
0.
0 /10
0 User reviews
Intel Core i9-9980XE
1 User reviews
Intel0 Core i9-9
10.0 /10
1 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
Reviews still not
10.0 /10
1 votes
reviews yet
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
10.0 /10
1 Votes
performance
reviews yet not
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Reliability
003
reviews yet there is no
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Energy efficiency
reviews yet there are no
10.0 /10
9000 1 Votes
Expensity
.
18 x 2.6GHz
18 x 3GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.4GHz
4.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✖Intel Core i9-9980XE
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
24.7MB
24.75MB
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.
L1 cache
1152KB
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.3MB/core
1.38MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
85.3GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR 9 memory version0003
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM.
New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.max memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Core i9-7980XE
✖Intel Core i9-9980XE
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9980XE)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9980XE)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
This test measures processor performance using multithreading.
2nd PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor.
(Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
104.3seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
264.3seconds
The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads.
Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9980XE)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i9-7980XE
✔Intel Core i9-9980XE
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i9-7980XE
✖Intel Core i9-9980XE
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-7980XE)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9980XE)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Intel Core i9-9980XE or Intel Core i
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i9-9980XE
71.2 (+2.4%)
Core i9-7980XE
69.5
Performance in everyday work, such as browsing and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i9-9980XE
69.3 (+3.6%)
Core i9-7980XE
66.8
maximum
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i9-9980XE 69.5 (+2.3%) Core i9-7980XE 67.9 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i9-9980XE 59.3 (+4.4%) Core i9-7980XE 56.7 |
Extreme |
|
Core i9-9980XE 49.3 (+5.9%) Core i9-7980XE 46.4 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths.
A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i9-9980XE
459 (+2.8%)
Intel Core i9-7980XE
446
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9980XE
7516
Intel Core i9-7980XE
7671 (+2%)
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core i9-9980XE
201 (+8.5%)
Intel Core i9-7980XE
184
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9980xe
3240
Intel Core i9-7980xe
3455 (+6.
2%)
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel i9-9980XE
,0002
Intel Core INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL )
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9980XE
15725
Intel Core i9-7980XE
16495 (+4.7%)
Passmark
Intel Core i9-9980XE
32402 (+9.1%)
Intel Core i9-7980XE
29464
Characteristics
The data is not yet complete, so the tables may be missing information or existing functions.
Main
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i9-9980XE Extreme Edition Processor (24.75M Cache, up to 4.50 GHz) | Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE Extreme Edition Processor (24.75M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz) |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. |
Skylake | Skylake |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
| Date of issueMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 04-2021 | 10-2020 |
| Model Official name. | i9-9980XE | i9-7980XE |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 18 | 18 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 36 | 36 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. |
4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 24.75 MB | 24.75 MB |
| Instructions | ||
| Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | SSE4. 1/4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Number of QPI links | No data | No data |
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 165W | 165W |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2017X | PCG 2017X |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. |
||
| GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | No data | No data |
| Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | No data | No data |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
RAM
| Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 4 | 4 |
| RAM bandwidth | ||
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. |
No data | No data |
PCI
| PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | 3 |
| PCI configuration options | ||
| Number of PCI lanes | 44 |
Data security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. |
No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i9-9980XE
- On average, gaming performance is 2% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 2%.
