8350 vs 6300: FX-6300 vs FX-8350 [in 4 benchmarks]

FX-8350 Eight-Core vs FX-6300 Six-Core — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with RX 580 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

RX 580 with

AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core



Call of Duty Modern Warfare


RX 580 with

AMD FX-6300 Six-Core



FX-8350 Eight-Core
FX-6300 Six-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

8948 Pts

6385 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1509 Pts

1407 Pts

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

FX-8350 Eight-Core vs FX-6300 Six-Core in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using RX 580 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions


FX-8350 Eight-Core
FX-6300 Six-Core


Ultra Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

53. 0 FPS

1080p

43.5 FPS

1440p

38.2 FPS

1440p

31.3 FPS

2160p

22.8 FPS

2160p

18.7 FPS

w1440p

32.6 FPS

w1440p

26.8 FPS

High Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

91.9 FPS

1080p

77. 6 FPS

1440p

69.4 FPS

1440p

58.4 FPS

2160p

44.4 FPS

2160p

37.3 FPS

w1440p

60.5 FPS

w1440p

51.0 FPS

Medium Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

130.8 FPS

1080p

111.7 FPS

1440p

100. 6 FPS

1440p

85.5 FPS

2160p

65.9 FPS

2160p

55.9 FPS

w1440p

88.4 FPS

w1440p

75.3 FPS

Low Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

208.7 FPS

1080p

179.9 FPS

1440p

162.9 FPS

1440p

139. 7 FPS

2160p

109.0 FPS

2160p

93.1 FPS

w1440p

144.2 FPS

w1440p

123.8 FPS

FX-8350 Eight-Core
    FX-6300 Six-Core

      Compare FX-8350 Eight-Core vs FX-6300 Six-Core specifications


      Share Your Comments 22

      Compare FX-8350 Eight-Core vs FX-6300 Six-Core in more games

      Elden Ring

      2022


      God of War

      2022


      Overwatch 2

      2022


      Forza Horizon 5

      2021


      Halo Infinite

      2021


      Battlefield 2042

      2021


      Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

      2020


      Microsoft Flight Simulator

      2020


      Valorant

      2020


      Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

      2020


      Death Stranding

      2020


      Marvel’s Avengers

      2020


      Godfall

      2020


      Cyberpunk 2077

      2020


      Apex Legends

      2019


      Anthem

      2019


      Far Cry New Dawn

      2019


      Resident Evil 2

      2019


      Metro Exodus

      2019


      World War Z

      2019


      Gears of War 5

      2019


      F1 2019

      2019


      GreedFall

      2019


      Borderlands 3

      2019


      Call of Duty Modern Warfare

      2019


      Red Dead Redemption 2

      2019


      Need For Speed: Heat

      2019


      Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

      2018


      Battlefield V

      2018


      Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

      2018


      Final Fantasy XV

      2018


      Shadow of the Tomb Raider

      2018


      Forza Horizon 4

      2018


      Fallout 76

      2018


      Hitman 2

      2018


      Just Cause 4

      2018


      Monster Hunter: World

      2018


      Strange Brigade

      2018


      Assassin’s Creed Origins

      2017


      Dawn of War III

      2017


      Ghost Recon Wildlands

      2017


      Destiny 2

      2017


      PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

      2017


      Fortnite Battle Royale

      2017


      Need For Speed: Payback

      2017


      For Honor

      2017


      Project CARS 2

      2017


      Forza Motorsport 7

      2017


      Ashes of the Singularity

      2016


      Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

      2016


      Battlefield 1

      2016


      Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

      2016


      Doom

      2016


      F1 2016

      2016


      Hitman

      2016


      Rise of the Tomb Raider

      2016


      The Division

      2016


      Total War: Warhammer

      2016


      Overwatch

      2016


      Dishonored 2

      2016


      DiRT Rally

      2015


      Grand Theft Auto V

      2015


      The Witcher 3

      2015


      Rocket League

      2015


      Need For Speed

      2015


      Project CARS

      2015


      Rainbow Six Siege

      2015


      Battlefield 4

      2013


      Crysis 3

      2013


      Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

      2012


      League of Legends

      2009


      Minecraft

      2009

      About AirPrint — Apple Support

      AirPrint is an Apple technology that helps you create full-quality printed output without the need to download or install drivers.

      With AirPrint technology, it’s easy to print full-quality photos and documents from your Mac, iPhone, or iPad. AirPrint features include easy discovery, automatic media selection, and enterprise-class finishing options. The products listed here are provided by each manufacturer and are updated regularly by Apple. If you don’t see your model, check with the manufacturer for more information.

      How to use AirPrint

      AirPrint is a technology built into most popular printer models, including the printers and print servers listed here. To use AirPrint, you don’t need to install an app, additional drivers, or other software. 

      How to print from your Mac
      How to print from your iPhone or iPad

      AirPrint devices

      AirPrint print servers

      These print servers are AirPrint-enabled.

      • HP ePrint Enterprise
      • HP JetAdvantage Connect
      • HP NFC/Wireless 1200w – Mobile Print Accessory
      • HP Roam for Business
      • iPrint Appliance
      • Lantronix xPrintServer Home
      • Lantronix xPrintServer Office
      • Lexmark International, Inc. Print Management
      • LRS Mobile Connector
      • Micro Focus iPrint Appliance
      • NT-ware uniFLOW
      • SEH Computertechnik GmbH primos

      USB-only devices

      Similar to AirPrint printers, these USB devices allow you to print or scan without having to install additional drivers. Because they require a USB connection, they support driverless printing or scanning only from Mac computers.

      • Brother DS-940DW
      • Brother MDS-940DW
      • Canon E201
      • Canon E204
      • Canon G1020
      • Canon G1220
      • Canon G1420
      • Canon G1520
      • Canon G1920
      • Canon G1922
      • Canon G2020
      • Canon G2021
      • Canon G2060
      • Canon G2160
      • Canon G2260
      • Canon G2420
      • Canon G2460
      • Canon G2520
      • Canon G2560
      • Canon G2820
      • Canon G2860
      • Canon G2920
      • Canon G2960
      • Canon G2962
      • Canon LiDE 300
      • Canon LiDE 400
      • Canon TS202
      • Canon TS203
      • Canon TS204
      • Canon TS205
      • Canon TS207
      • Canon TS208
      • Canon TS2620

      Adobe Systems Inc. , Conexant Systems Inc., and Qualcomm Technologies Inc. are AirPrint technology providers.

      Information about products not manufactured by Apple, or independent websites not controlled or tested by Apple, is provided without recommendation or endorsement. Apple assumes no responsibility with regard to the selection, performance, or use of third-party websites or products. Apple makes no representations regarding third-party website accuracy or reliability. Contact the vendor for additional information.

      Published Date: 

      AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8350

      • Main
      • &nbsp/&nbsp

      • CPU Comparison
      • &nbsp/&nbsp

      Overall rating

      Issued
      Q4/2012

      Issued
      Q4/2012

      Overall rating

      Which is better to choose AMD FX-6300 or AMD FX-8350?

      We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.

      AMD FX-6300 has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 6 cores. Power consumption 95 W. Released Q4/2012.

      AMD FX-8350 has a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. 8 cores. Power consumption 125 W. Released Q4/2012.

      Differences
      Characteristics
      Benchmarks (tests)
      Reviews

      Differences

      Reasons to choose
      AMD FX-6300

      Report a bug

      Positions in benchmark results

      General positions of AMD FX-6300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

      • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

        524 place

      • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

        408 place

      • Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

        824 place

      • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

        585 place

      • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

        944 place

      • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

        778 place

      • Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

        7 place

      • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

        605 place

      • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

        435 place

      • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

        490 place

      • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

        426 place

      • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

        579 place

      Reasons to choose
      AMD FX-8350

      Report a bug

      • Place in the overall ranking

        (based on several benchmarks)

        809 score

      • Higher clock speed

        About 13%
        higher clock speed

        4.00 GHz 3.50GHz

      • More cores

        In 1. 33 more cores

        8 6

      • Higher Turbo clock speed

        About 2% better overclocked clock speed

        4.20 GHz 4.10 GHz

      Positions in benchmark results

      General positions of AMD FX-8350 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

      • Cinebench R23 (Single Core)

        360 place

      • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

        281 place

      • Cinebench R20 (Single Core)

        511 place

      • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

        362 place

      • Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

        814 place

      • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

        451 place

      • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

        910 place

      • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

        636 place

      • Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

        38 place

      • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

        590 place

      • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

        351 place

      • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

        487 place

      • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

        302 place

      • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

        432 place

      Characteristics

      Technical data

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      CPU group and family

      Reference information about compared processors, series, generation and market segment.

      CPU specifications

      Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size. These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.

      • Frequency

        3.50 GHz 4.00 GHz

      • CPU Cores

        6 8

      • Turbo (1 Core)

        4.10 GHz 4.20 GHz

      • Threads

        6 8

      • Hypertrading

        No No

      • Acceleration

        Yes Yes

      • Kernel architecture

        normal normal

      IGPU

      Internal graphics does not affect CPU performance, performs the work of a graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

      Hardware codec support

      Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speed up the work with the required operations.

      RAM & PCI specifications

      Types, number of channels of RAM supported by AMD FX-8350 and AMD FX-6300. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.

      • Maximum memory

        32GB

      • ECC

        No Yes

      • Memory channels

        2 2

      • PCIe version

        3.0

      Encryption

      • AES-NI

        Yes Yes

      Energy consumption

      Compare AMD FX-6300 and AMD FX-8350 TDP requirements for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

      Technologies and extensions

      Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by AMD FX-6300 and AMD FX-6300, virtualization technology and process technology.

      • Instruction set (ISA)

        x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)

      • Virtualization

        AMD-V AMD-V

      • ISA Extensions

        SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4

      • Cash L3

        8.00MB 8.00MB

      • Architecture

        Vishera (Bulldozer) Vishera (Bulldozer)

      • Tech. process

        32 nm 32nm

      • Socket

        AM3+ AM3+

      • Issue

        Q4/2012 Q4/2012

      Benchmarks (tests)

      CPUs performance tests

      Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between AMD FX-6300 and AMD FX-8350.

      Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor!

      Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R20 SC — high load CPU benchmark for long running tasks on a desktop or laptop, uses a single CPU core, no hyperthreading.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU benchmark for long running tasks on desktop or laptop using multi-core mode and hyper trading.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R15 SC pushes desktop or laptop compute modules to the limit and accurately captures key hardware performance parameters.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R15 MC maximizes desktop or laptop compute modules and accurately measures hardware performance in multi-core mode.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive and multi-threaded.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

      Blender is an open source software that creates predefined 3D scenes and measures their execution time.

      1407.7

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core) , Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 3 MC using multi-core and hyper-trading, includes stress tests that simulate real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux , Ansroid, iOS

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode based on CINEMA 4D.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

      AMD FX- 6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

      PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance in file compression, encryption, and physics-related tasks.

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD FX-8350

      Latest comparisons

      Intel Celeron 5205U

      Intel Celeron J4125

      AMD Ryzen 5 3500

      Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4

      Intel Celeron 5205U

      Intel Core i5-7200U

      Intel Celeron J4125

      Intel Core i5-7200U

      AMD Ryzen 3 4300G

      AMD Ryzen 5 4500

      Samsung Exynos 850

      Raspberry Pi 4B (Broadcom BCM2711)

      Samsung Exynos 880

      Raspberry Pi 4B (Broadcom BCM2711)

      Intel Core i7-12800H

      AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H

      Intel Celeron G6900T

      Intel Core i3-8100T

      AMD Epyc 72F3

      Intel Xeon W-2125

      Apple M2

      Intel Core i7-7700K

      AMD FX-6350

      Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2

      Intel Core i3-4170

      Intel Core i3-L13G4

      Intel Core i5-6400

      Intel Core i7-3770K

      AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: comparison

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

      AMD FX-8350

      VS

      WINNER

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

      Rating: 28 points

      AMD FX-8350

      Rating: 9 points

      Test results

      Performance

      Memory specification

      Interfaces and communications

      Key features

      Top specifications and features

      • PassMark CPU score
      • PassMark CPU score
      • Heat dissipation (TDP)
      • Technological process
      • Geekbench score 5

      PassMark score CPU

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 23047
      AMD FX-8350: 6274

      Cinebench21.

      5 score (single) UBER

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 23
      AMD FX-8350: 7

      TDP

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 65 W
      AMD FX-8350: 125 W

      Process

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 7 nm
      AMD FX-8350: 32 nm

      Geekbench score 5

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 1554.854
      AMD FX-8350: 556.944

      Description

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X runs at 3.7Hz, second AMD FX-8350 runs at 4Hz. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is capable of overclocking up to 4.6 Hz, and the second up to 4.2 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 65W, while the AMD FX-8350 has 125W.

      In terms of architecture, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is based on 7nm technology. AMD FX-8350 on 32 nm architecture.

      Regarding processor memory. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X can support DDR4. The maximum supported volume is 128 MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 47. 7. The second processor AMD FX-8350 is capable of supporting DDR3. The bandwidth is 21. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.

      Graphics. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has a Discrete Graphics Card Required graphics core. The frequency of which is — No data MHz. AMD FX-8350 received a Discrete Graphics Card Required video core. Here the frequency is No data MHz.

      How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X scored 23047. And the AMD FX-8350 scored 6274.

      Why AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is better than AMD FX-8350

      • PassMark CPU score 23047 vs 6274 , 267% higher
      • Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 65 W vs. 125 W, -48% less
      • Process 7 nm vs 32 nm, -78% less
      • Geekbench 5 score of 1554.854 vs 556.944 , up 179%
      • Number of threads 12 vs. 8, 50% more

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs AMD FX-8350 Comparison: Highlights0046

      PassMark takes into account read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
      Show all

      23047

      max 89379

      Average: 6033.5

      6274

      max 89379

      Average: 6033.5

      Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

      7874.489

      max 23628.202

      Average: 5219.2

      2704.032

      max 23628.202

      Average: 5219.2

      Geekbench score 5

      1554.854

      max 1600.56

      Average: 936.8

      556.944

      max 1600.56

      Average: 936.8

      3DMark06 score

      15261

      max 18628

      Average: 3892. 6

      6901

      max 18628

      Average: 3892.6

      Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)

      21.2114

      max 45.3622

      Average: 5.3

      6.7896

      max 45.3622

      Average: 5.3

      Cinebench R15 score (Multi-Core)

      2045

      max 4614

      Average: 638.4

      661

      max 4614

      Average: 638.4

      Cinebench R15 score (Single-Core)

      263

      max 276

      Average: 128. 5

      100

      max 276

      Average: 128.5

      Number of threads

      The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
      Show all

      12

      max 256

      Average: 10.7

      8

      max 256

      Average: 10.7

      L2 cache size

      L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
      Show all

      3MB

      max 512

      Average: 4.5 MB

      8MB

      max 512

      Average: 4. 5 MB

      L3 cache size

      A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
      Show all

      32MB

      max 768

      Average: 16.3 MB

      8MB

      max 768

      Average: 16.3 MB

      Maximum clock speed in Turbo 9 mode0046

      When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it may jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
      Show all

      4.6GHz

      max 5.5

      Average: 3.2 GHz

      4.2GHz

      max 5.5

      Average: 3.2 GHz

      Number of cores

      6

      max 72

      Mean: 5. 8

      8

      max 72

      Mean: 5.8

      Processor base clock speed

      3.7GHz

      max 4.7

      Average: 2.5 GHz

      4GHz

      max 4.7

      Average: 2.5 GHz

      Unlocked processor multiplier

      Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, which makes them faster and better in games and other applications.
      Show all 9Max. number of processors in configuration

      1

      Mean: 1.3

      1

      Mean: 1.3

      DDR version

      4

      Mean: 3. 5

      3

      Mean: 3.5

      Max. memory bandwidth

      This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

      47.7GB/s

      max 352

      Average: 41.4 GB/s

      21GB/s

      max 352

      Average: 41.4 GB/s

      Memory frequency

      RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
      Show all

      3200 MHz

      max 4800

      Average: 2106.2 MHz

      1866 MHz

      max 4800

      Average: 2106.2 MHz

      Max. memory size

      Largest RAM memory.

      128GB

      max 6000

      Average: 404.4 GB

      GB

      max 6000

      Average: 404.4 GB

      Intel® AES-NI Commands

      AES is required to speed up encryption and decryption.

      Yes

      Yes

      sse version

      Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
      Show all

      4.2

      max 4.2

      Average: 4.1

      4.2

      max 4.2

      Average: 4.1

      Socket

      AM4

      AM3+

      Process

      The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

      7 nm

      Average: 36.8 nm

      32 nm

      Average: 36.8 nm

      Heat dissipation (TDP)

      Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
      Show all

      65W

      Average: 67.6 W

      125W

      Average: 67.6 W

      PCI Express Edition

      4

      Mean: 2.9

      Mean: 2.9

      Line

      AMD Ryzen Processors

      AMD FX-Series Processors

      Supports 64-bit system This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
      Show all

      Yes

      N/A

      Maximum processor temperature

      If the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded, a reset may occur.
      Show all

      95°C

      max 110

      Average value: 96 °C

      61°C

      max 110

      Average value: 96 °C

      Codename

      Vermeer (Zen3)

      Vishera

      Max Temperature Tcase

      95°C

      max 105

      Average: 75.1 °C

      °C

      max 105

      Average: 75.1 °C

      Purpose

      Boxed Processor

      Boxed Processor

      FAQ

      Can AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and AMD FX-8350 run in 4K?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — Not available. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

      How many PCIe lanes

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — Not available. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

      How much RAM do they support?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X supports 128 GB. AMD FX-8350 supports N/AGB.

      How fast are processors?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X runs at 3.7 GHz.

      How many cores does the processor have?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has 6 cores. AMD FX-8350 has 8 cores.

      Do the processors support ECC memory?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — Not available. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

      Does the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X have integrated graphics?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — Discrete Graphics Card Required. AMD FX-8350 — Discrete Graphics Card Required

      What RAM does the

      support? AMD Ryzen 5 5600X supports DDR4. AMD FX-8350 supports DDR3.

      What is the socket of the processors?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4. AMD FX-8350 is installed using AM3+.

      What architecture is used?

      The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) architecture.