860 Qvo vs 860 Evo
Solid State Drives (SSDs) are a very important component of any PC. To us here at WePC, they are essential especially for a PC or laptop that will be used for the purpose of gaming. SSD allows your laptop to run far quicker even when you are battling it out on the most intense first-person shooter game or competing professionally in an esports tournament.
In the past, HDDs were used instead of SSDs, and whilst they were just fine, for the high-intensity games of today and the multiple things we want our computers to do, an SSD is far more beneficial. When used in gaming laptops and PCs, SSDs can reduce load times drastically. Even the most casual gamer will benefit from this as they can stop the dreaded lag from happening on games.
It can also help in open-world games which are more prone to ‘hitching’ which is the term given to stuttering in a game. This is because SSDs tend to have excellent levels of speed in their data transfer speed. Some SSDs can even manage speeds up to and over 400 MBps. This is very impressive when considering the fact that HDDs can only reach speeds of 170MBps.
One of the world’s leading names for all things tech is, of course, Samsung. They are also no stranger to the world of SSDs. They have numerous versions of SSDs to choose from, with all of them being designed with different uses in mind.
For this article, we will be looking at just two of them. Going head to head is the 860 Qvo and the 860 Evo. they sound similar, they look similar, they even have some similar capabilities, but there are also some very stark differences between them.
We have decided to let the two of them battle it out for you to see which of them is better suited to your needs. We will be looking at their specifications, their features, their performance, and importantly the pricing. The focus will be on seeing how they compare on the same thing – gaming!
To compare them we have spent hours researching each of the models, looking at the specifications of each on Samsung’s website in detail, and reading reviews from other customers to see how each of them fare.
The process is a detailed one, but that is only to ensure that you have as much information as possible so that you can really get a feel for them without having to physically see the difference by buying them both.
Of course, they come in a variety of sizes, but for the sake of this article, we have chosen to look at the 1TB versions for each of them as these tend to be the most popular sizes.
Are you currently building a laptop or PC for personal use? Perhaps the focus will be on gaming? Maybe you are just considering the ways in which you need to go about building a PC and putting together a list of components you may be interested in including.
Whatever the case may be, and whatever may have brought you here, this is the perfect article for you if you are looking for the perfect SSD for your PC building journey and are considering a Samsung model. This article will prove very useful giving you detailed information about two of these very popular models.
So without further ado, we are going to get right into the article.
Samsung 870 Qvo Vs 860 Evo [2023] (The Ultimate Comparison)
It’s hard to keep up with all of the new SSD releases, but Samsung’s newest 860 Evo and 870 qvo are definitely worth taking a look at.
So which one should you choose?
In this post, we’ll compare the two drives to help you decide.
We’ll cover features, performance, and price to help you make the best decision for your needs.
Stay tuned for our full reviews of samsung 870 qvo vs 860 evo hard drive!
Samsung 870 qvo vs 860 Evo
See other Articles:
Crucial mx500 vs Samsung 860 Evo
Fitbit Versa 3 vs Samsung Active 2
Samsung galaxy s9 vs s10e
Table of Contents
First, What is QVO?
SAMSUNG 870 QVO SATA III 2.5″ SSD 1TB (MZ-77Q1T0B)
VS.
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB M.2 SATA Internal SSD (MZ-N6E1T0BW)
Samsung’s new QVO range of SSDs, which went on sale on June 30th, 2020, provided large capacity storage and speeds equivalent to far higher-end SSDs, all for a price that was nearly half that of a similar-sized Samsung PRO SSD, according to Samsung.
In addition, when I say “high capacity,” I really mean “high capacity.” From 1TB up to 8TB, Samsung offered SSDs in capacities that were unmatched by any other SSDs available in the broad consumer market at the time of their introduction in 2007.
Solid-state drives (SSDs) with capacities more than 2TB or even 1TB have traditionally been designated for enterprise applications or for power users who wish to be on the cutting edge of technology.
Each of this hard drive could cost upwards of $200 or more, and could potentially cost a thousand dollars.
For the typical Joe or Jill who didn’t require the absolute finest of the best, they weren’t a prudent investment, especially when the most storage-intensive task that they needed to do was general photo/video editing.
Especially when they can just as easily purchase an HDD that was comparable in size and had usable speeds for a tiny fraction of the price.
Samsung qvo
But what about QVO, do you think?
You could easily acquire a 1TB QVO model for around $90 if you shop around.
While the EVO and PRO editions cost roughly $110 and $200, respectively, the Samsung QVO is a significantly more cheap and fair alternative to these models.
Samsung Quality of Life and Longevity Comparison
Where have all the hard drives gone?
If they are so good, why isn’t everyone moving to them?
There’s a little more to it than that, to be honest.
All of those enticing advantages come at a price, as is the case with most things.
And the price for this is both speed and longevity. But for the most part, it’s just about living a long life.
See, before I can describe what it is, I need to first explain how solid-state drives (SSDs) function. Don’t be concerned, it is not overly technical.
SSDs, as opposed to hard disk drives (HDDs), do not store data on platters but instead use a technology known as NAND Flash to physically store data on the SSD.
When using NAND Flash, electrons are used to represent 1s and 0s, or charged and not charged states, respectively.
Everything digital, as you may be aware, is ultimately comprised of billions upon billions of 1s and 0s, which when added together form the same article you’re currently reading and everything else that you see on your computer screen right now.
When you change the memory that is contained within them in any manner, these electrons move and bounce between the numbers 1 and 0 an unimaginable number of times.
This is referred to as a “P/E cycle,” which stands for Program/Erase cycle.
This is a process that gradually wears down and damages the SSD’s internal hardware components.
This isn’t a lightning-fast procedure, to be sure.
Typically, you’ll have to read and write to the SSD hundreds of thousands of times per second in order for a typical current SSD to degrade to the point where it starts losing data.
Fortunately, modern SSDs are extremely durable.
Furthermore, there is a significant variance in the number of P/E cycles that different NAND Flash types can handle.
The many types are as follows:
- SLC is an abbreviation for Specialty Liquors Corporation (Single-Level Cell)
- MLC is an abbreviation for Multi-Language Corporation (Multi-Level Cell)
- Tender loving care (Triple-Level Cell)
- QLC is an abbreviation for Quality Leadership and Compliance (Quad-Level Cells)
- And, if certain speculations are to be believed, the impending PLC (Penta-Level Cells) technology.
What are Evo and its transfer speeds?
We need something to use as a baseline against which to measure everything.
So let’s have a look at how a 1TB Samsung EVO drive may perform in this situation.
The write performance of Samsung EVO drives without Intelligent TurboWrite is in the range of 300MB/s.
Write performance with Intelligent TurboWrite is approximately 530 megabytes per second.
For that 30GB transfer process to be completed, it would take an incredible 56 seconds.
Eh? What’s the deal with that?
Is it true that the more costly EVO is in fact slower?
Actually, this isn’t true at all.
I’d think that it’s well within the acceptable range of variation.
The EVO performs exceptionally well during the second operation, or when your transfers are larger than the QVO buffer.
What do you think will happen in this situation?
The speed of your transfer will decrease down after transferring 12GB of the file at the same rate. Your transfer will then operate at speeds of approximately 300MB/s.
I was able to complete it in almost exactly one minute.
QVO is four times as fast as this!
Comparison Between Samsung 870 qvo vs 860 Evo
Aspects that distinguish the Samsung SSD 860 EVO from the Samsung SSD 870 QVO
- In addition to 2.5-inch SATA iii SSDs, M.2 SATA SSDs and mSATA SSDs are also available.
- TLC memory that is more rapid
- Improved performance when not using TurboWrite buffer memory.
- TBW levels that are higher
- With a 5-year manufacturer’s warranty, you can rest easy.
When comparing Samsung SSD 870 QVO to Samsung SSD 860 EVO, there are several advantages.
Samsung SSD 870 QVO to Samsung SSD 860 EVO
- Capacity up to 8 TB Price is likely to decrease as QLC memory becomes more prevalent.
- Power usage has been reduced.
Performance and Speed
Because of the limitations of the SATA interface, the performance of the Samsung SSD 870 QVO and the Samsung SSD 860 EVO are extremely close to one another on a high-level comparison.
In sequential reading, the former is just 10 MB/s faster than the latter, with up to 560 MB/s compared to 550 MB/s.
When it comes to sequential writing, the two Samsung SSD series under consideration are accelerated to 530 MB/s and 520 MB/s, respectively, by using TurboWrite technology, which first stores the data in a predefined buffer area before being written to the disk.
Consider the greater capacities as an example: the TurboWrite buffer is the same size across the board, measuring 42 GB for the 1 TB models and 78 GB for the 2 TB and larger capacities.
Identifying the differences between flash memory and turbo write
The NAND flash used by the Samsung SSD 860 EVO and the Samsung SSD 870 QVO is the most significant difference between the two SSDs.
The 860 EVO is equipped with TLC memory, which is capable of storing three bits per cell and has a propensity to be speedier.
The 870 QVO is equipped with 4-bit QLC memory, which is more cost-effective due to the increased storage density than previous generations.
While copying particularly large files at 500 MB/s compared to 80 MB/s on the 1 TB SSD, the EVO series can demonstrate its superiority over the QVO series in this area because its write speed drops less sharply when using the TurboWrite buffer memory (as opposed to the QVO series’ write speed of 80 MB/s on the 1 TB SSD).
While this unique condition is unlikely to occur in normal life, the reading speed is not adversely affected in any way by it.
Differences in warranty and lifetime are discussed below.
Apart from the drive itself, there are no screws or connections on either of the Samsung SSD 870 QVO or Samsung SSD 860 EVO.
This results in a lean layout for both drives.
It is possible to obtain the useful in-house tools Samsung Magician Software for controlling and optimizing the SSD and Samsung Data Migration Software for cloning data from the old hard drive from the manufacturer’s website.
Another difference between the 870 QVO and the 860 EVO is the warranty period offered, which is three years rather than the far more customer-friendly five years offered by the 860 EVO, despite the fact that the TBW values are the same.
The interface and storage capabilities are similar in both cases.
Connections to the system are made by means of a third-generation SATA interface (SATA III, SATA 6 Gb/s), which is used by the Samsung SSD 860 EVO and Samsung SSD 870 QVO.
Unlike the 870 QVO, which is only available in the widely used 2.5-inch form factor, the 860 EVO gives users the option of choosing between an M.
2 2280 drive and a plug-in card with a SATA interface connection.
EVO series hard drives are available in a wide range of capacities that vary depending on the format.
The capacities range from 250GB to a maximum of 4TB depending on the format.
The QVO series begins with a flash memory storage capacity of 1 TB ssd, with the option of massive storage capacities of up to 8 TB with SSD ratios hard drive.
EVO vs QVO: Which is better?
Which is better?
So what’s the point of it all, you could ask.
EVO is the only way to go! Hold on to that for a moment.
This is the problem.
That is merely one example of a possible burden.
There are many more.
That something like that was chosen to showcase is almost unfair to QVO, but that’s exactly the goal of the exercise.
That test demonstrates what the QVO was not intended to do.
It reveals the flaws in QVO’s operations.
Which is write performance exceptionally big files to the drive (for example, extremely high-quality video capture)—reading on the other hand is often untouched or only marginally affected.
EVO wasn’t really designed for this purpose, but thanks to its MLC memory, it is substantially faster than Samsung QVO SSD even when the Intelligent TurboWrite feature is disabled.
But what if you don’t want to take part in this activity?
What if you only require a drive for general-purpose tasks and nothing more? Alternatively, how about gaming?
Would QVO be effective for the average layperson?
Yes! It would actually work fairly well, in my opinion.
Generally, you will not notice a difference between a QVO and, for example, a PRO in terms of sound quality and hard drive.
Due to the fact that these programs do not demand that much speed, it becomes somewhat redundant after a while, and they do not pound the SSD as much as a single large file would.
A QVO drive is typically capable of running the majority of the ordinary person’s general applications flawlessly.
Our Final Thoughts
Despite the fact that Samsung EVO outperforms QVO in almost every application, the value is not necessarily higher in every case.
If you need to deal with exceptionally huge, high-quality files and need to transmit them at high speeds without experiencing any slowness, an EVO or a PRO is the best choice.
If you need to do anything else, such as normal computer usage, gaming, or other workloads that don’t necessitate great storage performance, a QVO SSD will suffice, and you’ll save a few dollars in the process.
SAMSUNG 870 QVO SATA III 2.5″ SSD 1TB (MZ-77Q1T0B)
VS.
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB M.2 SATA Internal SSD (MZ-N6E1T0BW)
Frequently Ask Questions
What exactly is Samsung QVO stand for?
According to what I can tell, Quality and Value have been optimized.
What exactly does the term EVO mean?
I have no idea.
However, it is possible that it refers to Evolution and Value Optimization.
It doesn’t make much sense, but considering that the word “evolution” appears all over the box for an EVO, it appears to be a safe bet to assume such.
Is DRAM available in the Samsung QVO ssd?
Yes, it does. It is equipped with LPDDR4 qlc memory. Starting at 1GB, it doubles as the storage capacity increases starting with 1TB (2TB – 2GB | 4TB – 4GB | 8TB – 8GB), and it continues to double as the storage space increases.
Samsung 860 EVO vs 860 QVO: Technical comparison of
SSDs May 12, 2020
Matt Mills
Hardware Tips and Tricks
0
After the introduction of , buy SSD There are so many models on the market that it is often difficult to know which one is better, and you end up only looking at theoretical performance and speed. In this article we are going to make a technical comparison of between Samsung 860 EVO vs 860 QVO SSD to see which of the manufacturer’s two best-selling models is better, and especially which one is worth buying.
If we stick to cost alone, both SSDs are fairly evenly priced (although the QVO model often sells for less).
For reference, these are the prices for the 1TB variants of both models:
But let’s see what specifications these two solid state devices offer to check if one of them is superior to the other, or vice versa, neither is superior to the other, and it is worth just look at the price when buying them.
Technical comparison Samsung 860 EVO vs 860 QVO
Samsung 860 EVO vs 860 QVO
| Samsung 860 EVO | Samsung 860 QVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 2.5″, M.2, mSATA | 2.5″ |
| Interface | SATA 3 | SATA 3 |
| Capacity (GB) | 2 50, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 | 1000, 2000, 4000 |
| Vel. reading | 550 MB/s | 550 MB/s |
| Vel. Writing | 520 MB/s | 520 MB/s |
| MTBF | Up to 2400 TBT (4 TB). 600 TBW in 1 TB model. | Up to 1,440 TBT (4 TB). 360 TBW in 1 TB model. |
| Technologies | Samsung V-NAND | 3D NAND QLC |
| Warranty | 5 years | 3 years |
Obviously, in terms of theoretical performance, we have no winner, because their the speeds are exactly the same. Both SSDs use Samsung MJX controller and have 1GB DDR4LP SDRAM cache so it’s perfectly normal.
We found differences in terms of interfaces offered, since 860 QVO is only available in 2.5-inch format, 860 EVO is also offered in M.2 and mSATA formats.
Twin Flame Signals
Please enable JavaScript
Twin Flame Signals
The main difference between the two SSDs is the type of chips used; While the Samsung 860 EVO uses 3D NAND QLC chips, 860 EVO uses Samsung V-NAND chips which are MLC chips. As a result, Samsung 860 EVO has much longer durability than 860 QVO, and therefore its warranty period is also much longer.
Additional Specifications
The Samsung 860 EVO boasts TRIM support, AES 256-bit encryption, SMART support, DevSleep and garbage collection, and has a lifespan of 1.5 million hours.
For its part, the Samsung 860 QLC expands on these features a bit, because in addition to supporting TRIM, SMART, DevSleep and Garbage Collection, it expands encryption compatibility with AES-256, TCG / Opal and IEEE1667, and also adds support for WWN.
Otherwise, these are two identical SSDs in terms of their additional features, including, of course, compatibility with the Samsung Magician software.
Which of the two should I buy?
As we have seen in this Samsung 860 EVO vs 860 QVO SSD comparison method, they are two very similar SSDs in terms of features and performance, but the EVO model wins in terms of durability and also does it with a landslide.
In other words, unless there is a very good deal for the 860 QVO that makes the price difference significant, the 860 EVO is the best SSD because for equal performance it has much better durability and will be a device that will last a long time.
full power much longer.
- Samsung
- SSD
Samsung 870 EVO test: without a doubt the best SATA SSD to date
As the name suggests, the new Samsung 870 EVO SSD officially announced today is a two-year-old release of the 860 EVO level. And it is indeed true to share similar material components, but still much faster.
However, this new peripheral interior actually looks more like an improved version of the 870 QVO. They have a lot in common in performance characteristics. And once again, the 870 EVO also seemed to be more powerful, capable of continuous operation without braking.
This new SSD is the perfect choice for anyone looking for maximum SATA performance and storage capacity. In most cases, you won’t be able to get the best performance if you upgrade to an NVMe peripheral.
This, in addition to a relatively high endurance and a convincing price of only 13 to 20 cents per gig depending on the capacity, which varies from 250 Go to 4 To, the Samsung 870 EVO makes a simple recommendation.
Get one today!
Samsung 870 EVO: SATA SSD for higher performance
In terms of equals, 870 EVO to 860 EVO are the same as 870 QVO to 860 QVO. This is the next generation of standard Samsung SATA devices.
But as I said, these four SSDs are almost identical and do not differ from each other in color. All of them are SATA 3 (6 Gb/s) standard and can work in all applications that use a standard internal drive, be it a hard drive or another SSD.
However, in terms of performance, the 870 EVO outperforms the 870 QVO and 860 EVO.
Material characteristics: Samsung 870 EVO vs. 870 QVO vs 860 EVO
In fact 870 EVO has the same capacity, same memory type and same lifespan as 860 EVO. Sleep mode with cache and improved control unit provides much better performance.
| 870 KVO | 870 EVO | 860 EVO | |
| Tank | 1k, 2k, 4k, 8k | 250 Go, 1 To, 2 To, 4 To | 250 Go, 1 To, 2 To, 4 To |
| Interface | SATA 6Gb/s | SATA 6Gb/s | SATA 6Gb/s |
| Shape factor | 2. 5 lbs |
2.5 lbs | 2.5 lb mSATA m2 |
| Storage memory | Samsung V-NAND MLC 4 bit (QLC) | Samsung V-NAND MLC 3 bit (TLC) | Samsung V-NAND MLC 3 bit (TLC) |
| Check | Manette Samsung MKX | Controller Samsung MJX | Controller Samsung MJX |
| DRAM (cache) | LPDR4: 1 time (1 time) 2 Jump (2V) 4 Jump (4V) 8 Jump (8 to) |
LPDDR4: 512 mo. (250 / 500 years) 1 Jump (1 to) 2 Jump (2 V) 4 Jump (4 V) |
LPDDR4: 512 mo. (250 / 500 years) 1 Jump (1 to) 2 Jump (2 V) 4 Jump (4 V) |
| Sequential reading | Up to 560 Mo/s | Up to 560 Mo/s | 550 Mo/s |
| Sequential letter | Up to 530 Mo/s | Up to 530 Mo/s | 520 Mo/s |
| Random Read 4 Ko | Up to 98,000 IOPS | Up to 98,000 IOPS | Up to 10,000 IOPS |
| Random spelling 4 Ko | Up to 88,000 IOPS | Up to 88,000 IOPS | Up to 42,000 IOPS |
| TurboWrite cache | 42 Jump (1 To) 78 Eid (2 To, 4 To, 8 To) |
Unspecified amount from SLC NAND flash |
Unspecified amount from SLC NAND flash |
| Control software | Assistant Samsung | Assistant Samsung | Assistant Samsung |
| Endurance (Total number of written documents) |
360 TBW (1k) 720 TBW (2t) 1440 TBW (4K) 2880 TBW (8t) |
150 TBW (250 lb) 300 TBW (500 Go) 600 TBW (1 to) 1200 TBW (2 to) 2400 TBW (4 to) |
150 TBW (250 lb) 300 TBW (500 Go) 600 TBW (1 to) 1200 TBW (2 to) 2400 TBW (4 to) |
| USA (During start-up) |
$129. 99 (1 to) 2K ($249.99) 4K ($499.99) 8K (to be determined) |
$49.99 (250 years) $79.99 (500 years) $139.99 (1 to) $269.99 (2 to) $529.99 (4 to) |
$49.99 (250 years) $79.99 (500 years) $139.99 (1 to) $649.99 (2 to) $1399.99 (4 to) |
| Warranty | 3 years | 5 years | 5 years |
Compared to the 870 QVO, the 870 EVO uses the same speed classes. However, now it can manage long running without slowing down. QVO can’t be faster than in the shower.
Samsung 870 EVO detailed images
Endurance relatively high
870 EVO has the same endurance rating as the same as the 860 EVO, almost twice as much as the 870 QVO.
More precisely, the smaller capacity of 250 GB has a capacity of 150 teroctets.
This means that if you write 50 Go a day and every day on this device, you will need more than one year to meet the deadline.
And each superior ability doubles stamina as a result. 4 That’s 2400 teroctets and it will take you about 128 years to see your records at the same rate of 50 GB/day. I 2 That’s with me and I’m starting today. Come on at 64!
So even if the 870 EVO’s endurance isn’t the best — it’s always slower than the 860 PRO or any other NVMe SSD — it’s prudent to say that longevity isn’t something to worry about.
Useful programs of the Samsung Magician family
The 870 EVO uses the Samsung Magician family tablet, the best SSD tablet.
In addition to SSD status monitoring and firmware updates, open application of many features, the most useful of which are provisioning and RAPID mode.
Control allows users to enter a device percentage for the in-place recovery process to improve capture efficiency. This is a common feature of most SSDs.
RAPID mode, on the other hand, is a Samsung specific feature. Available for the first time in the 850 series, this exciting technology converts part of a cached computer’s memory (RAM) system to speed up an SSD.
RAPID works best when an SSD is used as a startup peripheral.
Overall, the Samsung Magician greatly enhances the value of the Samsung SSD in general and the 870 EVO in particular. This makes using the device enjoyable.
Samsung 870 EVO: excellent performance
I tested the 870 EVO with the 2 To version and it was very good. In fact, it is in the lists of all SATA drives that I have tested.
More precisely, during the copy test, the device delivered a supported speed of up to 500 Mo / s when writing and up to 530 Mo / s when reading. These were the closest to the speed required by the provider to view.
In tests that are written and read at the same time, it is fixed at 270 Mo/s. More importantly, I got these numbers even when sending hundreds of gigaoctets twice.