8700 vs 9400f: Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-8700 [in 14 benchmarks]

14 марта, 2023

Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i5-9400F Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8700 on one side and the Intel Core i5-9400F on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

Intel Core i7-8700

Intel Core i5-9400F
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Coffee Lake

Coffee Lake
Core name

Coffee Lake-S

Coffee Lake-S
Family

Core i7-8000

Core i5-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec

BX80684I78700,
BXC80684I78700,
CM8068403358316,
BOC80684I78700,
BO80684I78700,
SR3QS

BX80684I59400F,

CM8068403358819,

SRF6M
Release date

Q4 2017

Q1 2019
Lithography

14 nm++

14 nm++
Transistors

1. 800.000.000

—
Cores

6

6
Threads

12

6
Base frequency

3,2 GHz

2,9 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,6 GHz

4,1 GHz
Bus speed

8 GT/s

8 GT/s
Cache memory

12 MB

9 MB
Max memory capacity

128 GB

128 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2666

DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

41,6 GB/s

41,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

16

16
TDP

65 W

65 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)

None
GPU execution units

23

—
GPU shading units

184

—
GPU base clock

350 MHz

—
GPU boost clock

1200 MHz

—
GPU FP32 floating point

423,2 GFLOPS

—
Socket

LGA1151

LGA1151
Compatible motherboard

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

100°C

100°C
Crypto engine

AES New Instructions,

Secure Key

—
Security

Software Guard Extensions,

Memory Protection Extensions,

OS Guard,

Trusted Execution Technology,

Execute Disable Bit,

Boot Guard

—
Max display resolution

4096 x 2304@60Hz

—
CPU-Z single thread

489

443
CPU-Z multi thread

3. 865

2.525
Cinebench R15 single thread

184

177
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

1.396

987
Cinebench R23 single thread

1.151

1.010
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

8.956

5.571
PassMark single thread

2.665

2.470
PassMark CPU Mark

13.082

9.536
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

5.288

4.914
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

23. 378

19.012
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

406,6 GFLOPS

344,7 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

360 pts / W

292 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8700 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i5-9400F was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700

489

3.865
Intel Core i5-9400F

443

2. 525

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 53%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700

184

1.396
Intel Core i5-9400F

177

987

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 41%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700

1.151

8.956
Intel Core i5-9400F

1.010

5.571

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 61%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-8700

2.665

13.082
Intel Core i5-9400F

2.470

9. 536

In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 37%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700

5.288

23.378
Intel Core i5-9400F

4.914

19.012

In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700

6.041

26.876
Intel Core i5-9400F

5.288

19.278

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 39%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700

4.276

14.464
Intel Core i5-9400F

3.482

9.644

In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 50%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700

5. 742

25.519
Intel Core i5-9400F

5.289

21.232

In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i7-8700 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-9400F AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i7-870Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-8700TIntel Core i7-8705GIntel Core i7-8706G

Intel Core i5-9400Intel Core i5-9400HIntel Core i5-9400T

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i7-8700

Summary

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    100%

  • Intel Core i7-8700

    119%

Relative performance

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    100%

  • Intel Core i7-8700

    113%

Relative performance

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    100%

  • Intel Core i7-8700

    125%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-9400F
None
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-8700
13% higher single threaded performance.
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 25% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the Intel Core i5-9400F.
Around 19% higher average synthetic performance.

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-8700

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-8700

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features
Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i7-8700
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
HTT

Architecture
Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i7-8700
Architecture Intel_Coffelake vs Intel_Coffelake
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR4
Codename Coffee Lake vs Coffee Lake
Release Date Jan 2019 vs Jan 2018

Cores
Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i7-8700
Cores 6 vs 6
Threads 6 vs 12
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics No vs Intel UHD 630

Cache
Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i7-8700
L1 Cache 64K (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 9MB (shared) vs 12288 KB (shared)

Physical
Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i7-8700
Socket Intel Socket 1151 vs Intel Socket 1151
Max Case Temp 72°C vs 72°C
Package FC-LGA1151 vs FC-LGA1151
Die Size unknown vs 151mm²
Process 14 nm vs 14 nm

Performance
Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i7-8700
Cpu Frequency 2900 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Turbo Clock 4100 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage variable vs unknown
TDP 65 W vs 65 W

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    4920 points

  • Intel Core i7-8700

    5520 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    20880 points

  • Intel Core i7-8700

    27648 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Core i5-9400F (simulated)

    174. 25

  • Intel Core i7-8700 (simulated)

    197.7

points — higher is better

  • Intel Core i5-9400F (simulated)

    972.54

  • Intel Core i7-8700 (simulated)

    1221.19

points — higher is better

Intel Core i7 8700 vs i5 9400F:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i7 8700

Intel Core i5 9400F

Which is better: Intel Core i7 8700 at 3.2 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.6) or i5 9400F at 2.9 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.1)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Core i7 8700

56 56

Core i5 9400f

49

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003

Core i7 8700

30

Core i5 9400f

23

Energy efficiency

Energy Effect CHIP

Core i7 8700

45

Core

49,0002 49000 RICE RICE NANIST NANIST NANIST

Core i7 8700

44

Core i5 9400F

39

Key differences

What are the main differences between the 9400F and 8700

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700

  • Has 3 MB more L3 cache
  • Has an integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • 12% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 6 GHz vs 4.1 GHz)

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 9400F

  • Launched 1 year and 3 months later than rival

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i7 8700
+20%

1231

Core i5 9400F

1026

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i7 8700
+28%

7167

Core i5 9400F

5588

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i7 8700
+8%

2657

Core i5 9400F

2467

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i7 8700
+36%

13019

Core i5 9400F

9581

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i7 8700
+9%

1179

Core i5 9400F

1078

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i7 8700
+28%

6229

Core i5 9400F

4859

Add your Cinebench R23 results

Specifications

List of full specifications of the Intel Core i7 8700 and i5 9400F

General information

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Release date October 5, 2017 January 7, 2019
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Model number i7-8700 i5-9400F
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 No

Processor

Performance Cores
Cores 6 6
threads 12 6
Frequency 3. 2 GHz 2.9 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.6 GHz 4.1 GHz
General
Number of cores 6 6
Number of threads 12 6
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 32x 29x
Tire speed 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 256KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 12MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier No No
Process 14 nanometers 14 nanometers
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 65 W
Critical temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 —
GPU frequency 350 MHz —
Boost GPU frequency 1200 MHz —
Shader blocks 192 —
TMUs 24 —
ROPs 3 —
Computer units 24 —
TGP 15W —
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz —

iGPU FLOPS

Core i7 8700

0.38 teraflops

Core i5 9400F

n/a

memory support

Memory type DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
Max. size 128 GB 128 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
ECC 9 support0180

 No No

Other

Official site Site Intel Core i7 8700 Site Intel Core i5 9400F
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i7 8700

23 (60.5%)

Core i5 9400F

15 (39.5%)

Total votes: 38

Competitors

1.
Intel Core i7 8700 or i7 12700K

2.
Intel Core i7 8700 or i5 12600K

3.
Intel Core i7 8700 or i5 12400F

4.
Intel Core i7 8700 or i7 12700KF

5.
Intel Core i7 8700 or i3 12100

6.
Intel Core i7 8700 or i3 12100F

Compare other CPUs (480+)

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i7-8700

  • Main

    • &nbsp/&nbsp

  • CPU comparison

    • &nbsp/&nbsp

Overall rating

Issued
Q1/2019

Issued
Q4/2017

Overall rating

What is better to choose Intel Core i5-9400F or Intel Core i7-8700?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.

The Intel Core i5-9400F has a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. 6 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q1/2019.

The Intel Core i7-8700 has a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. 6 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q4/2017.

Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews

Differences

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i5-9400F

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core i5-9400F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

    278 place

  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

    252 place

  • Cinebench R20 (Single Core)

    274 place

  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

    242 place

  • Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

    230 place

  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

    316 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    343 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    1075 place

  • Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

    97 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

    29 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    163 place

  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

    307 place

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i7-8700

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core i7-8700 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

    224 place

  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

    205 place

  • Cinebench R20 (Single Core)

    163 place

  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

    185 place

  • Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

    118 place

  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

    223 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    269 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    305 place

  • iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

    647 place

  • Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

    132 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

    13 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    127 place

  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    13 place

  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    110 place

  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

    32 place

  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

    283 place

Characteristics

Technical data

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700

CPU group and family

Reference information about compared processors, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment

    Desktop / Server Desktop / Server

  • Series

    Intel Core i5 Intel Core i7

  • Generation

    9 8

  • CPU group

    Intel Core i 9000 Intel Core i 8000

  • Previous model

    Intel Core i5-8400 Intel Core i7-7700

  • Successor

    Intel Core i5-10400F Intel Core i7-9700

CPU specifications

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size. These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.

  • Frequency

    2.90 GHz 3.20 GHz

  • CPU cores

    6 6

  • Turbo (1 Core)

    4.10 GHz 4.60 GHz

  • Threads

    6 12

  • Turbo (6 Cores)

    3.90 GHz 4.30 GHz

  • Hypertrading

    No Yes

  • Acceleration

    No No

  • Kernel architecture

    normal normal

IGPU

Internal graphics does not affect CPU performance, performs the work of a graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU

    no iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • GPU frequency

    0.35GHz

  • GPU (Turbo)

    no turbo 1.15 GHz

  • Processing units

    24

  • Shaders

    192

  • Max. GPU Memory

    — 64GB

  • Max. displays

    3

  • Generation

    9.5

  • DirectX Version

    12

  • Tech. process

    14nm

  • Issue

    Q4/2017

Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speed up the work with the required operations.

RAM & PCI Specifications

Types, number of channels of RAM supported by Intel Core i7-8700 and Intel Core i5-9400F. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.

  • Memory type

    DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666

  • Maximum memory

    128GB 128GB

  • ECC

    No No

  • Memory channels

    2 2

  • PCIe version

    3. 0 3.0

  • PCIe channels

    16 16

Encryption

  • AES-NI

    Yes Yes

Power Consumption

Compare the TDP requirements of Intel Core i5-9400F and Intel Core i7-8700 for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by Intel Core i5-9400F and Intel Core i5-9400F, virtualization technology and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)

    x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)

  • Virtualization

    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

  • ISA Extensions

    SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2

  • Cash L3

    9.00 MB 12.00 MB

  • Architecture

    Coffee Lake S Refresh Coffee Lake S

  • Tech. process

    14 nm 14 nm

  • Socket

    LGA 1151-2 LGA 1151-2

  • Issue

    Q1/2019 Q4/2017

Benchmarks (tests)

CPUs performance tests

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between the Intel Core i5-9400F and Intel Core i7-8700.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor! Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 SC — high load processor test for long tasks on a desktop or laptop, uses a single processor core, no hyper-threading .

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU benchmark for long running tasks on desktop or laptop using multi-core mode and hyper trading.

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 SC pushes desktop or laptop compute modules to the limit and accurately captures key hardware performance parameters.

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 MC maximizes desktop or laptop compute modules and accurately detects hardware performance in multi-core mode.

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive.

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive and multi-threaded.