Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti vs 960M
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,105,485 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
68,656 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 19% MSI(1462 115A) 2GB
Worst Bench: 13% Legend(17AA 3978) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 13%
Great: 19%
SPEED RANK: 204th / 688
1,036,829 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 35% MSI(1462 3351)
Worst Bench: 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 29%
Great: 35%
SPEED RANK: 147th / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
17. 7 % | 30.9 % | Much faster effective speed. +75% |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
21.3 fps | 37.6 fps | Much better lighting effects. +77% |
|||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
19.8 fps | 41.5 fps | Hugely better reflection handling. +110% |
|||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
23.9 fps | 37.8 fps | Much faster multi rendering. +58% |
|||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
22. 4 fps | 39.2 fps | Much faster NBody calculation. +75% |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
23.1 fps | 44.1 fps | Hugely better peak lighting effects. +91% |
|||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
26 fps | 48.1 fps | Hugely better peak reflection handling. +85% |
|||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
24.8 fps | 38.9 fps | Much faster peak multi rendering. +57% |
|||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
24. 1 fps | 43.4 fps | Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. +80% |
CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
102 Fps | 120 Fps | Better CSGO Fps. +18% |
|||
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
32 Fps | 43 Fps | Much Better GTAV Fps. +36% |
|||
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
100 Fps | 135 Fps | Much Better LoL Fps. +34% |
|||
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
54 Fps | 75 Fps | Much Better Overwatch Fps. +38% |
|||
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
56 Fps | 102 Fps | Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps. +82% |
Market Share
Based on 55,823,353 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.13 % | 2.53 % | Insanely higher market share. +1,846% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
55 % | 79 % | Much more popular. +44% |
Age Newest |
89+ Months | 72 Months | More recent. +19% |
|||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
22.8 fps | 41.7 fps | Hugely better peak texture detail. +83% |
|||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
17 fps | 29.1 fps | Much faster peak complex splatting. +71% |
|||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
20.1 fps | 38.2 fps | Hugely better texture detail. +90% |
|||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
15.2 fps | 26.7 fps | Much faster complex splatting. +76% |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
-
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960M Graphics cards Comparison
When comparing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 960M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 960M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Check Price
GeForce GTX 960M
Check Price
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
GeForce GTX 960M Laptops
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce GTX 960M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 960M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 960M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 960M — in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 960M — with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 195 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 960M — by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 4508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 960M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 960M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce GTX 960M | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | N17P-G1 | N16P-GX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 25 October 2016 | 12 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1291 MHz | 1096 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66. 82 | 47.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 1,505 gflops |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1. 2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.3 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 768 | 640 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 326 Mh/s | 175 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 1.
|