970 vs rtx 2060: Nvidia GTX 970 vs RTX 2060

6 января, 2023

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce GTX 970



  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce GTX 970

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    188%

  • GeForce GTX 970

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2060
88% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 970
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (29 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce RTX 2060 GeForce GTX 970
GPU Name TU106 (TU106-200A-KA-A1) vs GM204 (GM204-200-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 445 mm² vs 398 mm²
Transistors 10,800 million vs 5,200 million
Shaders 1920 vs 1664
Compute Units 30 vs 13
Core clock 1365 MHz vs 1050 MHz
ROPs 48 vs 56
TMUs 120 vs 104

Memory Configuration
GeForce RTX 2060 GeForce GTX 970
Memory Type GDDR6 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 192 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective		 vs 1753 MHz

7012 MHz effective
Memory Size 6144 Mb vs 4096 Mb
Additional details
GeForce RTX 2060 GeForce GTX 970
TDP 160 watts vs 148 watts
Release Date 15 Jan 2019 vs 19 Sep 2014

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    80. 64 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 970

    58.80 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    201.60 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 970

    109.20 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    336.00 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 970

    224.40 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    6451.00 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 970

    3494.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    117

  • GeForce GTX 970

    65

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    123

  • GeForce GTX 970

    75

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    103

  • GeForce GTX 970

    53

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    123

  • GeForce GTX 970

    79

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    89

  • GeForce GTX 970

    49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    93

  • GeForce GTX 970

    47

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    86

  • GeForce GTX 970

    44

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    131

  • GeForce GTX 970

    78

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    115

  • GeForce GTX 970

    66

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    106

  • GeForce GTX 970

    53

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    82

  • GeForce GTX 970

    45

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    76

  • GeForce GTX 970

    37

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    105

  • GeForce GTX 970

    55

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    57

  • GeForce GTX 970

    29

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    65

  • GeForce GTX 970

    31

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    57

  • GeForce GTX 970

    29

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    84

  • GeForce GTX 970

    49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    83

  • GeForce GTX 970

    45

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    76

  • GeForce GTX 970

    42

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    45

  • GeForce GTX 970

    22

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    50

  • GeForce GTX 970

    29

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    39

  • GeForce GTX 970

    18

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    56

  • GeForce GTX 970

    27

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    28

  • GeForce GTX 970

    14

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    39

  • GeForce GTX 970

    19

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    29

  • GeForce GTX 970

    14

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    48

  • GeForce GTX 970

    25

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    45

  • GeForce GTX 970

    25

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce RTX 2060

    41

  • GeForce GTX 970

    25

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Radeon RX 6600
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Radeon RX 6600 XT
VS
GeForce GTX 970 GeForce GTX 1650
VS
GeForce GTX 970 Radeon RX 570
VS
Radeon RX 6650 XT GeForce RTX 2060 Super
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Super Radeon RX 5700

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 1664 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,2 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2176 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q3 2014

Q3 2019
Model number

GM204-200-A1

TU106-410-A1
GPU name

GM204

TU106
Architecture

Maxwell 2. 0

Turing
Generation

GeForce 900

GeForce 20
Lithography

28 nm

12 nm
Transistors

5.200.000.000

10.800.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

1,05 GHz

1,47 GHz
GPU boost clock

1,18 GHz

1,65 GHz
Memory frequency

1.753 MHz

1.750 MHz
Effective memory speed

7 GB/s

14 GB/s
Memory size

4 GB

8 GB
Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR6
Memory bus

256 Bit

256 Bit
Memory bandwidth

224,4 GB/s

448,0 GB/s
TDP

148 W

175 W
Suggested PSU 500W ATX Power Supply 550W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

4-way SLI

—
Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort

1x DVI
1x HDMI
2x DisplayPort
1x USB Type-C
Maximum GPU Temperature

98°C

89°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

13

34
Shading units (cuda cores)

1. 664

2.176
TMUs

104

136
ROPs

56

64
Cache memory

2 MB

4 MB
Pixel fillrate

66,0 GP/s

105,6 GP/s
Texture fillrate

122,5 GT/s

224,4 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

3,9 TFLOPS

7,2 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

122,5 GFLOPS

224,4 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

7.181
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

3.920

The difference is 83%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.