Snapdragon 865 vs A13 Bionic: tests and benchmarks
VS
Snapdragon 865
A13 Bionic
We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (Adreno 650) with the older 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 Bionic GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v9
- GeekBench 5
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (19)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 865
68
A13 Bionic
78
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 865
60
A13 Bionic
69
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 865
79
A13 Bionic
81
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 865
68
A13 Bionic
77
Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- Performs 67% better in floating-point computations
- Has 2 more cores
- 7% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2660 MHz)
- Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 9 score – 661K vs 632K
Pros of Apple A13 Bionic
- Better instruction set architecture
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 865
vs
A13 Bionic
AnTuTu 9
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 865
+5%
661945
A13 Bionic
632312
| CPU | 185438 | 166601 |
| GPU | 217870 | 255111 |
| Memory | 117733 | 90801 |
| UX | 136946 | 116310 |
| Total score | 661945 | 632312 |
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won’t affect NanoReview scores.
Submit your AnTuTu result
GeekBench 5
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Snapdragon 865
939
A13 Bionic
+42%
1338
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 865
3484
A13 Bionic
+1%
3511
| Image compression | 173. 2 Mpixels/s |
155.7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 25.2 images/s | 30.2 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 52.6 words/s | 89.8 words/s |
| Machine learning | 55.8 images/s | 73.1 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 29.5 images/s | 33.8 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 2.95 Mnodes/s | 3.81 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 997.7 Krows/s | 899.2 Krows/s |
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Snapdragon 865
3871
A13 Bionic
+95%
7549
| Stability | 91% | 71% |
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | 45 FPS |
| Score | 3871 | 7549 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
| PUBG Mobile | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
57 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 61 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | 30 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [High] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
59 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 1080 x 2340 |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro 828 x 1792 |
We provide average results.
FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 and A13 Bionic
| Architecture | 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
2x 2.66 GHz – Lightning 4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2660 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 832 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | — |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 10. 3 billion |
8.5 billion |
| TDP | 10 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 650 | Apple A13 Bionic GPU |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | — |
| GPU frequency | 587 MHz | — |
| Execution units | 2 | 4 |
| Shading units | 512 | — |
| FLOPS | 1228 Gigaflops | 736 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12.1 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | — |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 34. 1 Gbit/s |
— |
| Max size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 698 | Yes, Neural Engine |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 | NVMe |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2688 x 1242 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | — |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ |
Connectivity
| Modem | X55 | — |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 |
LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 220 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| Announced | December 2019 | September 2019 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | SM8250-AB | — |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site | — |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose?
Snapdragon 865
3877 (52%)
A13 Bionic
3581 (48%)
Total votes: 7458
Related Comparisons
1.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Google Tensor
4.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and MediaTek Helio G99
5.
Apple A13 Bionic and Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
6.
Apple A13 Bionic and Apple A14 Bionic
7.
Apple A13 Bionic and Apple A10 Fusion
Compare other chipsets (140+)
Snapdragon 865 Plus vs A13 Bionic: tests and benchmarks
VS
Snapdragon 865 Plus
A13 Bionic
We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus (Adreno 650) with the older 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 Bionic GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v9
- GeekBench 5
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (6)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 865 Plus
70
A13 Bionic
78
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 865 Plus
66
A13 Bionic
69
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 865 Plus
79
A13 Bionic
81
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 865 Plus
72
A13 Bionic
77
Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
- Performs 85% better in floating-point computations
- Has 2 more cores
- 17% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 2660 MHz)
- Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 9 score – 729K vs 632K
- Announced 10-months later
Pros of Apple A13 Bionic
- Better instruction set architecture
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 865 Plus
vs
A13 Bionic
AnTuTu 9
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 865 Plus
+15%
729840
A13 Bionic
632312
| CPU | 192608 | 166601 |
| GPU | 243249 | 255111 |
| Memory | 133307 | 90801 |
| UX | 155856 | 116310 |
| Total score | 729840 | 632312 |
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won’t affect NanoReview scores.
Submit your AnTuTu result
GeekBench 5
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Snapdragon 865 Plus
922
A13 Bionic
+45%
1338
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 865 Plus
3320
A13 Bionic
+6%
3511
| Image compression | — | 155. 7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | — | 30.2 images/s |
| Speech recognition | — | 89.8 words/s |
| Machine learning | — | 73.1 images/s |
| Camera shooting | — | 33.8 images/s |
| HTML 5 | — | 3.81 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | — | 899.2 Krows/s |
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Snapdragon 865 Plus
4179
A13 Bionic
+81%
7549
| Stability | 82% | 71% |
| Graphics test | 25 FPS | 45 FPS |
| Score | 4179 | 7549 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
| PUBG Mobile | 74 FPS [Ultra] |
57 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | 28 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [High] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 104 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | 56 FPS [Ultra] |
59 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [High] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Asus ROG Phone 3 1080 x 2340 |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro 828 x 1792 |
We provide average results.
FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 Plus and A13 Bionic
| Architecture | 1x 3.1 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
2x 2.66 GHz – Lightning 4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2660 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 832 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | — |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | — | 8. 5 billion |
| TDP | 10 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 650 | Apple A13 Bionic GPU |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | — |
| GPU frequency | 645 MHz | — |
| Execution units | 2 | 4 |
| Shading units | 512 | — |
| FLOPS | 1365 Gigaflops | 736 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12.1 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | — |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | — |
| Max size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 698 | Yes, Neural Engine |
| Storage type | UFS 3. 0, UFS 3.1 |
NVMe |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2688 x 1242 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | — |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ |
Connectivity
| Modem | X55 | — |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 220 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5. 2 |
5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| Announced | July 2020 | September 2019 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | SM8250-AB | — |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus official site | — |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose?
Snapdragon 865 Plus
1162 (66.3%)
A13 Bionic
590 (33.7%)
Total votes: 1752
Related Comparisons
1.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
2.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
3.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Apple A13 Bionic
4.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and Apple A13 Bionic
5.
Apple A15 Bionic and Apple A13 Bionic
6.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Apple A13 Bionic
7.
Apple A14 Bionic and Apple A13 Bionic
8.
Apple A12 Bionic and Apple A13 Bionic
9.
Apple A10 Fusion and Apple A13 Bionic
Compare other chipsets (140+)
Snapdragon 865 vs A13 Bionic:
benchmarks and specs
VS
Snapdragon 865
A13 Bionic
We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (Adreno 650) with its older rival, the 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 Bionic GPU). See the table of characteristics, the advantages of each of the chips, as well as the results of testing benchmarks AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Overview
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v9
- GeekBench 5
- Games
- Features
- Comments (3)
Overview
Comparison of performance and energy consumption scores (from 1 to 100)
CPU performance
CPU speed
Snapdragon 865
68
A13 Bionic
78
Gaming performance
Main differences
List of the main advantages of each of the processors
Benefits of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- Shows 67% better floating point performance
- Has 2 more cores
- 7% higher CPU frequency (2840 vs 2660 MHz)
- ) points in AnTuTu 9 — 661K vs 632K
Benefits of Apple A13 Bionic
- Best instruction set architecture
Benchmark tests
Test results in Geekbench, AnTuTu and other benchmarks
Chip:
Snapdragon 865
vs
A13 Bionic
AnTuTu 9
AnTuTu Benchmark measures the speed of CPU, GPU, memory and other system components
Snapdragon 865
+5%
661945
A13 Bionic
632312
| CPU | 185438 | 166601 |
| GPU | 217870 | 255111 |
| Memory | 117733 | |
| UX | 136946 | 116310 |
| Total score | 661945 | 632312 |
AnTuTu results obtained on different platforms are incompatible with each other! These data are not taken into account in the final grade.
Add your AnTuTu test result
GeekBench 5
GeekBench shows single-threaded and multi-threaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Snapdragon 865
939
A13 Bionic
+42%
1338
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 865
3484
A13 Bionic
+1%
3511
| Image compression | 173.2 Mpixels/s | 155.7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 25.2 images/s | 30.2 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 52.6 words/s | 89.8 words/s |
| Machine learning | 55.8 images/s | 73.1 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 29.5 images/s | 33.8 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 2.95 Mnodes/s | 3.81 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 997.7 Krows/s | 899. 2 Krows/s |
3DMark
Cross-platform benchmark that evaluates graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal).
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Snapdragon 865
3871
A13 Bionic
+95%
7549
| Stability | 91% | 71% |
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | 45 FPS |
| Score | 3871 | 7549 |
Games
Average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
| PUBG Mobile | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
57 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 61 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | 30 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [High] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
59 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Smartphone | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 1080 x 2340 |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro 828 x 1792 |
FPS may vary based on game version, operating system, and other variables.
Specifications
Snapdragon 865 and A13 Bionic performance comparison chart
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.84 GHz — Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz — Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz — Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
2x 2.66 GHz — Lightning 4x 1.6 GHz — Thunder |
| Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2660 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 832 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | — |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 10.3 billion | 8.5 billion |
| TDP | 10W | 6W |
GPU
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Apple A13 Bionic GPU |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | — |
| GPU frequency | 587 MHz | — |
| Computer units | 2 | 4 |
| Shader units | 512 | — |
| FLOPS | 1228 Gflops | 736 Gflops |
| Vulcan version | 1. 1 |
1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| DirectX Version | 12 | 12.1 |
RAM
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | — |
| Tire | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Capacity | Up to 34.1 Gbps | — |
| Volume | Up to 16 GB | Up to 4 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor | Hexagon 698 | Yes, Neural Engine |
| Accumulator type | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 | NVMe |
| Max. display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2688 x 1242 |
| Max. camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | — |
| Video recording | 8K@30FPS, 4K@60FPS | 4K @ 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K@30FPS, 4K@60FPS | 4K @ 60FPS |
| Codec support | H. 264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
| Audio | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ |
Communications and networks
| Modem | X55 | — |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Download speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 220 Mbps |
| WiFi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
General information
| Announcement date | December 2019 | September 2019 |
| Grade | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | SM8250-AB | — |
| Official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 website | — |
Poll
Smartphone on which of the chips would you prefer?
Snapdragon 865
3877 (52%)
A13 Bionic
3581 (48%)
Total votes: 7458
Competitive comparisons
1.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Google Tensor
4.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and MediaTek Helio G99
5.
Apple A13 Bionic and Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
6.
Apple A13 Bionic and Apple A14 Bionic
7.
Apple A13 Bionic and Apple A10 Fusion
Compare other SoCs (140+)
Does the Snapdragon 865 surpass the legend A13 Bionic in terms of speed and performance? IPhone Islam
A few months ago when the iPhone 11 was released, we shared an article with you about Apple A13 Bionic Processor New and we wrote about it in poetry and prose as it was a revolutionary magician with tremendous performance at the time and at that time, we have made it clear how much it outperforms other processors, but after the launch of Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon 865 processor last month, everything is as it is? This is what we will talk about today, conducting performance tests with us!
Apple A vs Snapdragon
Processor Comparison Mode Over the past three years, Apple has always made significant progress in its processors in exchange for what the Android world has to offer in terms of processors, which is a huge world that has Kirin processors from Huawei, Exynos from Samsung, Snapdragon from Qualcomm in addition.
to many slow processors from MediaTek! But in fact So, the Apple A11 processor, for example, which appeared with the iPhone 8 in 2017, it showed excellent performance compared to the processor. Snapdragon 855 He is the Wizard of the Year 2019! Roughly speaking, both therapists acted in the same way.
If we download Snapdragon 855 again and compare it with Apple A13 Bionic Processor This is the Apple processor of the same 2019, we will find that the Apple processor has reached up to 25% advantage, and you may know this information, but if we took this information into the direct comparison space and mentioned that Al Jadeed’s Snapdragon 865 processor delivers 20-25% better performance than its predecessor, so we’ll find that in numbers. Snapdragon 865 performance = Apple A13 Bionic performance!
banknote : The term «processor» is used metaphorically for the smartphone chipset, SoC — System on a Chip, which is actually more than just processors, because it includes chips that include many things, including the processor itself! For example, the Apple A13 chip includes a CPU, a GPU, a neural engine.
.. and more!
Benchmarks: Apple A13 vs Snapdragon 865
Benchmark tests were done on the iPhone 11 Pro Max to measure the best possible performance for the Apple A13 processor, while the same tests were done on a standard device designed by Qualcomm, and this is because the new Snapdragon processors were not released to the market yet! This device is known as the Qualcomm Reference Device (QRD) or Qualcomm Reference Device.
As far as tests for the older Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus was used! This is because the tests included three processors, not just new processors, and they were also run using SpeedTest GX 2.0.
New Snapdragon 865 processor in green, Apple processor in yellow and old Snapdragon 855 processor in orange on top.
As you can see from the tests prepared by AndroidAuthority, the new Snapdragon processor is the winner, but undoubtedly the Apple A13 Bionic processor is still tipping the scales.
GPU performance, Here, the iPhone 11 Pro Max processor completed its 3D Unity performance tests. 14.5 seconds vs 16.9 seconds New Snapdragon 865 processor! Of course, the GPU’s GPU is the controller of the device’s ability to run high quality games and videos.
AnTuTu performance tests.. Will they give the same results?
Before we finish the article with you, there is no objection to sharing AnTuTu performance tests for each of the Apple A13 Bionic processor and the new Snapdragon 865 processor with the old Snapdragon 855 processor, and this is because many supporters of the technical field give more Trust in the AnTuTu platform than others and here are the results (which are not much different):0003
So.
