A6 4400m specs: AMD A-Series A6-4400M Notebook Processor

Technologies supported by A6-4400M that speed up virtual machines are listed.

RAM support

Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A6-4400M. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

Integrated video — specifications

General parameters of the integrated video card in A6-4400M.

Benchmarks

These are the results of the A6-4400M performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4400M
1.01

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• WinRAR 4.0
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-4400M
1020

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A6-4400M
342

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A6-4400M
500

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A6-4400M
2292

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-4400M
3407

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-4400M
1804

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A6-4400M
1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A6-4400M
0.8

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a program no longer maintained by developers that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-4400M
1

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A6-4400M
1353

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A6-4400M
8

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A6-4400M
39

Relative capacity

Overall performance of the A6-4400M compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.

Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800
100

Intel Pentium J2850
100

Intel Core i5-560UM
100

AMD A6-4400M
100

Intel Celeron N2930
99.01

AMD A4 Micro-6400T
99.01

Intel Core i3-3229Y
99.01

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to A6-4400M from Intel is Pentium J2850, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating.

Pentium
J2850

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A6-4400M:

Intel Pentium 3556U
100.99

Intel Pentium J2850
100

Intel Core i5-560UM
100

AMD A6-4400M
100

Intel Pentium 2127U
99.01

Intel Core i3-3229Y
99.01

Intel Celeron N2930
99.01

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Pentium
J2850

Compare

Core i5
560UM

Compare

A6 Pro
7050B

Compare

Pentium
2127U

Compare

Pentium
3556U

Compare

A6
7000

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

According to our statistics, these graphics cards are most often used with A6-4400M:

Radeon HD
7520G

40. 7%

Radeon HD
7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

21.3%

Radeon HD
7670M

11%

Radeon
Graphics

3.7%

Radeon HD
7600G

1.7%

HD
Graphics 4000

1.3%

Radeon HD
7570

1.1%

Radeon HD
7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

0.7%

Radeon HD
7650M

0.7%

Radeon RX
Vega 8

0.5%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.

Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the A6-4400M processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

characteristics AMD A6-4400M APU, price, competitors, competitors

• Home
• >
• Processors
• AMD
• >
• A6-4400M APU 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 APU APU APU APU Number of cores — 2.

  A6-4400M APU core frequency — 2.7 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 2.85 GHz.

  Price in Russia

  Want to buy cheap A6-4400M APU? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.

  Family

  • A6-4455M APU

  Benchmarks AMD A6-4400M APU

  Game performance

  Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

  The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

  The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

  Speed ​​in office use

  Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

  The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

  Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

  Speed ​​in heavy applications

  Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

  The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

  At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

  Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

  Speed ​​of numerical operations

  Simple household tasks
  Minimum	Average	Maximum
  36	Memory: 67

  85 9000
  

  Memory 70.6
  19	1 core: 44	59
  1 core 21. 6
  31	2 cores: 69	86
  2 cores 17.1

  Demanding games and tasks
  Minimum	Average	Maximum
  37	4 cores: 70

  86 900
  

  4 cores 8.8
  40	8 cores: 71	86
  8 cores 4. 6

  Extreme
  Minimum	Average	Maximum
  36	All cores: 71	085 9006
  All cores 1.3

  Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

  We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

  Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

  When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

  Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

  Benchmarks

  Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

  Passmark

  Intel Core2 Duo T9500

  1010

  AMD Athlon II X2 220

  1003

  Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9000,1001 9000 9000 9000 Duo e8200 9000 Duo e82000002 1001

  Intel Pentium E6600

  998

  AMD A6-4400M APU

  995

  Intel Core2 Duo T9300

  991

  Intel Pentium E5500

  986

  Intel Celeron N2930

  983

  Intel Core2 Duo E7400

  974

  AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+

  967

  Game Benchmarks

  FPS we measured in popular games on AMD A6-4400M APU and meets system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.

• HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHZ)
• HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHZ)
• HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHZ) 9000

9000 9000 9000 9000

9000

240GB

We have put together a list of parts that users most often choose when building a computer based on A6-4400M APU. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.

The most popular config: motherboard for AMD A6-4400M APU — HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC, graphics card — GTX Titan Z (SLI Disabled), SSD — A400 240GB.

Characteristics

The data is not yet complete, so the tables may be missing information or missing existing features.

Basic

Manufacturer	AMD
Date of release The month and year the processor was released.	10-2016
Cores The number of physical cores.	2
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	2
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	2.7 GHz
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	2.85 GHz
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No

Video core

RAM

PCI

Data protection

Design

Competitors

Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.

Compare

AMD A6-4400M APU vs Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

AMD A6-4400M APU vs Intel Core i7 L 640

AMD A6-4400M APU vs Intel Core2 Duo T9400

AMD A6-4400M APU vs Intel Pentium E5700

AMD A6-4400M APU vs Intel Celeron 1007U

AMD A6-4400M APU vs Intel Core2 Duo P9400

AMD A6-4400M processor review: specifications, benchmark tests

The A6-4400M processor was released by AMD, release date: 15 May 2012. The processor is designed for laptop computers and is built on the Trinity architecture.

Processor locked for overclocking. The total number of cores is 2. The maximum clock frequency of the processor is 3.2 GHz. Technological process — 32 nm. Cache size: L1 — 96 KB, L2 — 1024 KB.

Supported socket type: FS1r2. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 35 Watt.

Benchmarks

PassMark Single thread mark	Top1 CPU This CPU
PassMark CPU mark	Top1 CPU This CPU	118142
Geekbench 4 Single Core	Top1 CPU This CPU
Geekbench 4 Multi-Core	Top1 CPU This CPU
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection	Top1 CPU This CPU	56.680 mPixels/s 3.341 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation	Top1 CPU This CPU	741.453 Frames/s 123.579 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex	Top1 CPU This CPU	3. 237 Frames/s 0.338 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition	Top1 CPU This CPU	49.002 Frames/s 8.280 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining	Top1 CPU This CPU	218.231 mHash/s 0. 585 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen	Top1 CPU This CPU	9047 Frames 496 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan	Top1 CPU This CPU	7128 Frames 2268 Frames
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex	Top1 CPU This CPU	12887 Frames 4945 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen	Top1 CPU This CPU	9047.000 Fps 496.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan	Top1 CPU This CPU	7128. 000 Fps 2268.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex	Top1 CPU This CPU	12887.000 Fps 4945.000 Fps

Name	Meaning
PassMark — Single thread mark	1040
PassMark — CPU mark	1020
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	331
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	484
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection	3.341 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation	123.579 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex	0.338 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition	8.280 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining	0.585 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen	496 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	2268 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	4945 Frames
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen	496.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	2268.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	4945.000 Fps

Features

configuration

Architecture name	Trinity
Issue date	15 May 2012
Place in the ranking	1372
Series	AMD A-Series
Applicability	Laptop
Support 64 bit
Crystal area	246mm
Level 1 cache	96KB
Level 2 cache	1024KB
Process	32nm
Maximum frequency	3. 2 GHz
Number of cores	2
Number of transistors	1303 Million
Maximum number of processors in	1
Supported sockets	FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

Navigation

Choose a processor

Processor comparison

AMD A6-4400M vs.