A8 6600k vs q9400: AMD A8-6600K APU vs Intel Core2 Quad Q9400

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a8-6600k-vs-core-2-quad-q9400%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



Radeon RX
580



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U











Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a8-6600k-vs-core-2-quad-q9400%23characteristics

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



Radeon RX
580



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U











Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 vs.

Intel Core2 Duo E6600

Intel Core2 Extreme X6800

Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 runs with 2 and 2 CPU threads It runs on — base — all cores while TDP is set to 75 W . Processor connects to LGA CPU socket 775 This version includes — L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen. Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Conroe (Core) architecture is advanced beyond 65 nm and supports VT-x . The product was launched Q3/2006

Intel Core2 Duo E6600

Intel Core2 Duo E6600 runs with 2 and 2 CPU threads It runs on — basic — all cores while the TDP is set to 65 W . The processor connects to an LGA 775 CPU socket This version includes — L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen. Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Conroe (Core) architecture is advanced beyond 65 nm and supports VT-x . The product was launched Q3/2006

Intel Core2 Extreme X6800

Intel Core2 Duo E6600

Frequency 2. 40 GHz 2 Kernels 2 — Turbo (1 core) — — Turbo (all cores) — No.

nine0026 Hyper Threading No. Yes Acceleration Yes normal Basic architecture normal no iGPU GPU no iGPU no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo 65nm Technology 65nm no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo DirectX Version Max. displays DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 memory size DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory size No. ECC No. 4.00MB L2 Cache 4.00 MB — L3 Cache — PCIe version PCIe lanes 65nm Technology 65nm LGA 775 Connector LGA 775 75 W TDP 65W VT-x Virtualization VT-x Q3/2006 Release date Q3/2006

Show more details

Show more details

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd. nine0003

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

nine0032

Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 Intel Core2 Duo E6600
75 W Max TDP 65W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Operating cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Operating cost per year NA

Popular comparison

AMD A8 6600K

3. 9GHz | 4 cores

VS

Intel Core i5 4590S

3GHz | 4 cores | LGA 1150

Benchmarks

Overall result

Based on 11 tests:

Intel Core i5 4590S 26.23% faster

AMD A8 6600K

91

Intel Core i5 4590S

6288

Reasons to choose AMD A8 6600K

  • High frequency (3.9 GHz vs 3 GHz) means more operations per second
  • High turbo frequency : 4.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
  • Unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • Larger L2 cache (4MB vs 1MB) allows processor to access data faster
  • Larger L2 cache per core: 1 MB/core vs. 0.25 MB/core
  • A high critical temperature (74°C vs. 71.35°C) allows the processor to work in harsher temperature conditions
  • A higher frequency of the integrated video processor: 844 MHz vs. 350 MHz (22nm vs. 32nm) allows you to get more performance with less heat
  • Larger L3 cache (6MB vs.