|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
With the Athlon, AMD had accomplished their trend-setting goals, and observers could
This contrasts pure 64-bit processors which translate into expensive purchases of new hardware
© Copyright 1999-2022 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 3200+ processor released by AMD; release date: January 2001. At the time of release, the processor cost $150. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Clawhammer microarchitecture.
CPU is locked to prevent overclocking. Total number of cores — 1. Maximum CPU clock speed — 2.2 GHz. Manufacturing process technology — 130 nm.
Cache size: L1 — 128 KB, L2 — 512 KB.
Supported socket types: 754. Maximum number of processors in a configuration — 1. Power consumption (TDP): 89 Watt.
Benchmarks
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 DesktopBitcoin Mining |
|
|
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 577 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 491 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 196 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 197 |
CompuBench 1._F.jpg) 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining |
0.260 mHash/s |
Specifications (specs)
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer |
| Launch date | January 2001 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $150 |
| Place in performance rating | 2653 |
| Price now | $149.95 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.97 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | |
| Die size | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 |
| Transistor count | 105 million |
|
|
|
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon 64 3200+ with others
AMD
Athlon 64 3200+
vs
Intel
Pentium III 1400
AMD
Athlon 64 3200+
vs
Intel
Celeron 220
AMD
Athlon 64 3200+
vs
AMD
Phenom X4 9750 (125W)
AMD
Athlon 64 3200+
vs
Intel
Atom 230
AMD
Athlon 64 3200+
vs
AMD
Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
AMD
Athlon 64 3200+
vs
AMD
Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
Athlon 64 3200+ processor [in 1 benchmark]
AMD
Athlon 64 3200+
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD Athlon 64 3200+ sales in January 2001 at a suggested price of $150.
This is a Clawhammer architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread and is manufactured in 130 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2000 MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket 754 processor with a TDP of 89W.
We don’t have any test results for the Athlon 64 3200+.
General
Information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of the Athlon 64 3200+, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
| Place in the performance rating | does not participate | $87 (0.6x) | of 18494 (Xeon Platinum 8280M) |
Specs
Athlon 64 3200+ quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
| Core | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Support 64 bits | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compatibility with Windows 11 | — |
Also includes a separate single-threaded test. | Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 0.3 Mh/s |
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the one considered.
Recommended video cards
According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with Athlon 64 3200+:
GeForce
7300 GT
5.8%
Radeon RX
Vega 3
4%
GeForce GT
430
4%
GeForce
9500 GT
3.
5%
GeForce
9600 GT
3.5%
GeForce
6600
2.3%
GeForce
210
2.3%
GeForce GT
240
2.3%
GeForce GTS
250
2.3%
GeForce GTX
460
2.3%
User rating
Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Lima: TESTS, competitors, price
- Home0019
Processor Athlon 64 3200+
Number of cores — 1, manufactured according to 65 nm process technology, Lima architecture.
Athlon 64 3200+ base frequency — 2 GHz. Please note that the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 45W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase.
Thanks to the built-in N/A video core, the computer can work without a discrete graphics card because the monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard.
Price in Russia
Want to buy Athlon 64 3200+ cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
- Athlon 64 4000+
- Athlon 64 3800+
- Athlon 64 3400+
- Athlon 64 3500+
- Athlon 64 3000+ 9000
AMD Athlon Athlon Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Minimum Average Maximum 28 Memory: 60 94 Memory
61.9
11 1 core: 25 33 1 core
10.5
13 2 cores: 25 32 2 cores
5.
4 Demanding games and tasks
Minimum Average Maximum 16 4 cores: 26 33 4 cores
2.8
18 8 cores: 26 33 8 cores
1.5
Extreme
Minimum Average Maximum 19 All cores: 27 32 9003
All cores
0.
5 Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Compare
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
Intel Atom 330
371
AMD Sempron 3600+
364
AMD E-300 APU
359
AMD V120
352
Intel Pentium 4 3.
20GHz 337
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
332
Intel Atom N2600
323
AMD Athlon 64 4000+
321
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHZ
9000 318
005
AMD C-60 APU
311
Tests in games
FPS measured by us in popular games on AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and compliance with system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.
On average for all gaming tests, the processor scored 27.3 points out of 100, where 100 is the fastest gaming processor to date.
SSD
- A400 240GB
- A400 480GB
Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.
The most popular config: motherboard for AMD Athlon 64 3200+ — bin bin, video card — SVGA 3D, SSD — A400 240GB.
Features
Basic
| Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | AMD Socket AM2 |
| Manufacturer Firm | AMD |
| Presentation datePresentation in the media, official information. | 2007-02-20 |
| Codename of the Microarchitecture family. | Lima |
| GenerationCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Athlon 64 (Lima) |
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | Yes |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. |
Yes |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing |
| Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 2 GHz |
BCLK System bus frequency. Some motherboards allow you to achieve a good performance boost by slightly raising the bus frequency. Often this has a bad effect on the stability of the system. |
200 |
| CPU multiplier. The final CPU frequency is determined by the simple formula BCLK * CPU multiplier. Modern processors instantly change the multiplier of each of the cores, taking into account the type of load, temperature, consumption and settings in the BIOS. | 10 |
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 45 W |
Cache and RAM
| L1 Cache First level cache. Modern processors use a multi-level cache. The first is the fastest, but the smallest. In the case of an L1 access and a miss, the L2 cache is searched for the next stage. | 128K |
L2 Cache Second level cache. Holds more data, but is slower. |
512K |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR2 Dual-channel |
Video core
| Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | N/A |
PCI
| PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | Gen 2 |
Details
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. |