AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 / 65 nm
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 832 vs 193
- 4. 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1418 vs 335
Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 4 May 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 / 65 nm |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 832 vs 193 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1418 vs 335 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 694 vs 609
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 606 vs 547
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1. 9 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 35 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 694 vs 609 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 606 vs 547 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 609 | 694 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 547 | 606 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 832 | 193 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1418 | 335 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Lion | Trinidad / Tyler |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 4 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 2084 | 2478 |
Series | 2x AMD Athlon | AMD Turion 64 X2 Dual-Core Mobile Technology |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Family | AMD Turion | |
OPN Tray | TMDTL60HAX5DM | |
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 / 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1. 9 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Base frequency | 2 GHz | |
Die size | 147 mm | |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | |
Transistor count | 154 Million | |
Unlocked | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | S1 | S1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
PowerNow | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Supported memory frequency | 667 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR2 |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 with others
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-60
vs
Intel
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-60
vs
AMD
Turion X2 RM-70
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-60
vs
AMD
Turion II M520
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-60
vs
Intel
Atom E3825
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-60
vs
AMD
A6-6310
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-60
vs
Intel
Celeron 827E
What’s the Best Power Supply in 2021?
Sure, it’s not as exciting as graphic card shopping, but a PSU is the heart of your PC.
The last thing you want is an inefficient machine due to poor power, especially after spending all that cash on the best components.
Plus once it’s dying, you might not know until it’s too late.
And you want to get the right one from the start, as replacing one later is a pain.
Fortunately, we’ve ranked the best power supplies: overall, as well as for gaming, video editing and streaming, and budget options.
What Makes a Good Power Supply?
Wattage
Wattage is obviously the most important part of a power supply, and the first decision you need to make is: how much do you need?
There are huge leaps in price the stronger you go, so you don’t want to get more than necessary. Plus, higher wattage PSUs will mean a higher electricity bill and tend to generate more heat and noise.
You need to add up your motherboard, GPU and PSU power requirements to make a total. Then add a bit extra for security, and in case you plan on updating other components to something more power-hungry later.
As a rough guide, 750W or less will definitely be enough for most people. For gamers, 850W should do just fine. Only the most extreme gamers and 3D renderers will need to go beyond this.
Fortunately, there are tons of calculators around to make this easy for you:
- Seasonic Wattage Calculator
- MSI PSU Calculator
- be quiet! PSU Calculator
- Cooler Master Power Calculator
- Newegg PSU Calculator
Ratings and protection
PSUs come with some great certifications, such as efficiency ratings that (e.g. 80 Plus Gold) and noise ratings (e.g. LAMBDA-A+).
These instantly tell you the quality of the PSU.
Decent PSUs should also have decent protection features, such as OCP (Over-Current Protection) and SCP (Short Circuit Protection) to ensure everything runs safe and smooth.
The warranty is another big one. Because PSUs are so important and should last for the long term, they often come with long warranties. A long warranty also shows you the confidence the manufacturer has in its own product. They wouldn’t give out 10-year warranties if they weren’t sure of a quality, long-lasting build.
Compatibility
Finally, you’re going to want to make sure the PSU is actually compatible with your system, or you’re going to have major buyer’s remorse once you’ve unboxed it.
Check what connectors the PSU has, and make sure you’ve got the cables to match, with the right power supply.
Size is another big one to watch. Check the physical dimensions of the PSU to make sure it will fit inside your case. Just because you’ve got an ATX case doesn’t mean an ATX PSU is guaranteed to fit.
How We Choose Power Supplies
Features and Performance
The above features give a good idea of quality, but to really compare one PSU against another, you’ve got to perform real-life testing.
With power supplies, there’s a whole host of things you can measure, such as ripple measurements to measure ripple suppression, cross-load tests and infrared to measure temperature.
Sure, there’s an efficiency rating of 80 Plus Gold, but that only specifies a minimum. Testing can tell you exactly how efficient it is at different loads, compared to competitors.
The same goes for noise.
Purpose
We always bear the user purpose in mind, instead of just going for the flagship PSUs.
User purpose is crucial for PSU, as different activities will require different wattages.
For example, barely anyone needs above an 850W supply, so why spend the money?
Noise is a major issue for some, especially if you’re spending long hours editing video or want to stream without noise interference.
Value for money
The price has to be reasonable and fit for purpose. And the most important question is, can you get more for your money elsewhere?
Best Overall Power Supply
Corsair RM750x
Image credit: Corsair
Corsair RMx
Tech Specs
Form factor: ATX
Capacity: 750W
Efficiency rating: 80 Plus Gold
Modularity: Full
Pros
- Quiet
- High-quality build
- 10-year warranty
Cons
- 750W not enough for high-end gaming
- Short distance between peripheral connectors
750W is a very popular wattage that combines the capacity of high-end hardware with competitive prices. It will certainly be enough power for most.
And Corsair’s popular RM series has produced a model that’s currently the best of the bunch.
It’s fully modular, meaning no messy cables. It’s got an
80 Gold Plus efficiency rating with LAMBDA-A+ certification. And on top of that, it’s got a staggering 10-year warranty.
Compared to its predecessor, it’s 2cm shallower, has a second EPS connector, and more peripheral connectors, all of which is much more practical.
The connectors include the popular 8 four-pin Molex connectors, though the distance between them is 10cm, which is a little tight.
It’s very well-built. There’s a 135mm fan with a rifle bearing and microcontroller, which reduces noise. The ATX, EPS, and PCIe cables also come with capacitors to help reduce ripple.
These worked well, as ripple suppression on all rails was top-notch.
The real beauty of this PSU is its volume; it’s so quiet!
It’s average noise level (between 30-32°C) is just 19dbA. One of its main competitors at this price point, Seasonic’s SSR-750FX 35, was almost double at 35dbA.
That’s over 1.5 times the noise since a 10dbA increase represents double the apparent volume to human ears.
Even more remarkably, Corsair’s model even achieves near-silence at full load or overloads. It was just 30dbA at full load at 46°C, compared to the Seasonic SSR0750PX which reached 45dbA.
Performance is similar to the Seasonic, but the noise levels just edge it in front.
Honorable Mentions:
Seasonic SSR-750PX: another well-rounded modular performer with similar specs and price, but noisier.
Best Bang for the Buck Power Supply
Bitfenix BF450G
Image credit: Bitfenix
Bitfenix BF450G
Tech Specs
Form factor: ATX
Capacity: 450W
Efficiency rating: 80 Plus Gold
Modularity: None
Pros
- Very efficient
- Extremely quiet
- Compact
Cons
- Not modular
- Power may be too low for some
It’s got an 80 plus Gold efficiency rating, which is impressive for the price. Even within this, it tested over 89% efficiency, better than most competitors.
It’s very quiet, with a LAMBDA-A++ certification, which again is surprising at this budget, and shocking since it doesn’t even have a semi-passive mode and a small 120mm fan.
This is due to its excellent build. This well-designed PSU has minimal energy losses, which keeps it at a low temperature, enabling the fan to spin slowly and remain quiet.
Even at 100% load and over 46°C, the noise was below 40dbA. Below this, the fan never spun at its maximum speed and spun at its lowest speed most of the time.
3 +12V rails deliver 450w combined, and the 5VSB rail can deliver up to 2.5A.
In terms of protection features, OPP is set high and short circuit protection is on all rails.
Every rail had excellent ripple suppression, though in this aspect the EVGA 450 B3 does edge ahead. The ATX cable has capacitors to help reduce ripple on the PSU’s outputs.
Load regulation was tight on all rails, beating other 450 models like the EVGA 450 B3 and Corsair CX450.
Overall performance beat other popular 450 models (Corsair, EVGA), and was only very slightly behind the Seasonic SSR-550X.
There are 2 PCIe connectors and 2 4-pin Molex connectors. The distance between connectors is a nice 15cm. The PCIe and EPS connectors are powered by dedicated rails.
A big downside is it’s not modular, which makes cable management a bit difficult, but you can’t expect too much at this price point. And Bitfenix has chosen to sacrifice in this area, rather than the actual components, a wise choice.
At least the PSU is very compact at just 150 x 87 x 140mm, making it easier to install.
The warranty is 5 years too, which is very decent.
The power might not be enough for some, but if you can swing 450w, this is definitely the best all-round choice.
Honorable Mentions:
EVGA 500 B1 – another excellent budget option if you need slightly more power, but it only has an 80 Plus Bronze efficiency rating and isn’t as quiet.
BitFenix Whisper 450 M – a slightly more expensive version if you want a modular PSU.
Best Power Supply for Gaming
Corsair RM850x
Image credit: Corsair
Corsair RMx
Tech Specs
Form factor: ATX
Capacity: 850W
Efficiency rating: 80 Plus Gold
Modularity: Full
Pros
- Fully modular
- Quiet
- Great build
Cons
- Short distance between peripheral connectors
- Pricey
Another Corsair RM offering takes the lead for gaming, too, with a model with much more power than the 750x, but a similar great design and warranty.
Again its fully modular with 80 Plus Gold efficiency, and that 10-year warranty to reassure customers of Corsair’s confidence in the quality of its products.
Like the 750 model, there’s a 135mm rifle bearing fan. It’s 20mm shorter than its predecessor, meaning it’s more likely to fit into your build.
The +12V rail delivers the full capacity. The minor rails are too strong, with 150W maximum together, whilst the 5VSB rail has a maximum output of 3A.
Again there’s 2 EPS connectors, 6 PCIe ones, and lots of peripheral connectors, including 8 Molex connectors. Again though, there’s only 10cm distance between these, which is less than ideal.
The cables have decent length, though, and the ATX, EPS and PCIe cables include inline caps for improved ripple suppression. Ripple suppression overall is excellent.
Again, it wins in the noise arena; it’s one of the quietest 850W models out there. It’s got a LAMBDA-A+ noise rating, quite an achievement for an 850w power supply.
EVGA’s 850 G3 and Seasonic’s SSR-850FX are the main competition, and they don’t achieve the same noise rating (LAMBDA-S++).
The build is excellent. Despite being smaller than its predecessor, it’s even quieter and performs just as well. A microcontroller enables slower fan rotation, and there are different controllers on the primary and secondary sides.
Some would like to see an updated look, though, as this design has been around a while.
Honorable Mentions:
EVGA SuperNOVA 850 G3 – similar performance, but more pricey.
Seasonic’s SSR-850FX – similar specs, but not as quiet.
Best Power Supply for Video Editing
EVGA’s SuperNOVA 650 G3
Image credit: EVGA
EVGA G3
Tech Specs
Form factor: ATX
Capacity: 650W
Efficiency rating: 80 Plus Gold
Modularity: Full
Pros
- Modular
- Excellent value
Cons
- Only 1 EPS connector
- Not the quietest
650W should be enough for video-editing at resolutions at 4K and above.
And this is one of the cheapest 650W 80 Gold Plus models you can buy. It’s truly excellent value, especially for video editors who have probably already spent a whole heap on both a high-performing CPU and GPU.
You’d think this would mean certain sacrifices in performance, but no; it’s overall performance is actually one of the best of the 650W 80 Gold Plus models, including Corsair and Seasonic.
And the Super Flower build is solid (Super Flower are one of the best in the biz), with top-of-the-game ripple suppression and very tight load regulation on all rails.
The +12V rail delivers all of the PSU’s capacity, the minor rails are perfectly capable, and the 5VSB rail can deliver a large 3A.
However, noise-wise, it has a LAMBDA-A- noise certification. This isn’t the best, but it certainly doesn’t mean it’s ‘noisy’. It has an average noise of 27.31dbA. For comparison, this is louder than Corsair’s similar models.
The problem is the 130mm HDB fan gets a bit overly aggressive, rotating faster than most at lower temperatures.
There’s also only 1 EPS connector which may be an issue for some users, as well as 3 PCIe, 6 SATA and 4 Molex.
It’s fairly compact at 85 x 150 x 150mm and comes with a decent 7-year warranty.
Honorable Mentions:
Corsair AX1000 – if you need top-end power for things like 3D rendering, this is the best 1000W option.
Best Power Supply for Streaming
Seasonic SSR-600TL
Image credit: Seasonic
Seasonic
Tech Specs
Form factor: ATX
Capacity: 600W
Efficiency rating: 80 Plus Titanium
Modularity: Full
Pros
- Fanless
- Crazy efficient
- 12-year warranty
Cons
- Expensive
This PSU sets records in many ways.
The best streaming requires total silence, and that’s what you’ll get with this fanless PSU. It’s got the top Cybenetics noise rating of LAMBDA-A++, which promises silence.
Noise levels were always below 28dbA, which is basically a whisper.
Passive-cooling CPUs are typically reserved for lower wattages, but the Seasonic SSR-600TL bucks this trend.
It’s outfitted with high-quality 105c Japanese capacitors
Not only that, but it’s also got the highest Cybernetics efficiency rating of 80 Plus Titanium. This means a 94+% efficiency level at 50% load, and 90% at 100% load.
However, testing by third parties has shown it to be even better at 96% at 50% load, and 93.5% at full load.
With both top efficiency and noise, this makes it one of the highest-quality PSUs around.
It’s fully modular of course, and also very compact at 170 x 150 x 86 mm. Perfect for a streamer’s build.
There are 3 heatsinks and the entire thing is vented to allow maximum airflow.
The +12V rail can handle a stellar 50A, and the 5VSB rail an average 2.5A. However, the minor rails can only deliver 100W combined, which is a little weak, but they aren’t used much.
Load regulation is very tight, beating all major 650w competitors overall.
In terms of protection features, OPP is good and there’s short circuit protection on all rails. It’s well-protected from voltage spikes and large inrush currents as well.
Ripple suppression is solid, helped by high-grade 105c Japanese capacitors throughout. In fact, KitGuru found this model’s ripple suppression to be in the top 2% of all models.
It includes 2 EPS connections, 4 PCIe connectors, a rarity on fanless models, 6 SATA, and 5 Molex. There’s less than 15cm between the peripheral connectors, which isn’t ideal, but it’s limited by its overall size.
It’s overall performance beat all other major 650w models except for its own, the Seasonic SSR-650TD, which isn’t fanless.
650W should allow you enough headroom for components for game streaming at 1080p and even 1440p.
The only downside is the higher price you pay for fanless.
But at least Seasonic puts its money where its mouth is with a record 12-year warranty.
Honorable Mentions:
Seasonic SSR-650TD – if you’re not fussed about silent passive-cooling, this is another great option.
Best Budget Power Supply for Gaming
Cooler Master MasterWatt 650
Image credit: Cooler Master
Cooler Master
Tech Specs
Form factor: ATX
Capacity: 650W
Efficiency rating: 80 Plus Bronze
Modularity: Semi-modular
Pros
- Affordable
- Quiet
- Reliable brand
Cons
- Only 80 Plus Bronze
- Semi-modular
If you want to game on a budget, look no further than this solid Cooler Master series. It’s not the cheapest available, but sticking with a decent brand that’s safe and reliable is worth it when it comes to PSUs, especially if you’ve invested in a mid-range graphics card you plan to overclock.
It’s got 80 Plus Bronze efficiency and is a pretty impressive 86.6% at full load.
Compared to competitors, it really impresses with noise as well, which is a definite plus when spending long hours gaming.
Up to 15% load (i.e. around 100w), this model is silent. Up to 270W, it’s only 28dbA, which is just above a whisper. At 500W it’s around 33dbA. Max dbA is 34.9. So basically, it’s whisper-quiet up until around 500W.
This is due to the Silencio FP 120mm fan, which has an LDB (Loop Dynamic Bearing) design with low vibrations and an ultra-low current.
The design is a clean-looking black and the build is decent for the price point, with decent soldering quality and 85c capacitors.
It’s semi-modular, with 2 PCIe connectors and 2 SATAs.
Temperatures are around 62°C at full load, which definitely can’t match the premium 750w models, but you get what you pay for.
The +12V rail can deliver 54A, which is definitely enough for a gamer’s graphic card. The minor rails can deliver 22A combined.
Ripple suppression is good, hitting 50mV on the +12V rail at full load.
And finally, it comes with a nice 5-year warranty.
Honorable Mentions:
Cooler Master MasterWatt 750W – if you need more juice and have a bit more cash, Cooler Master also has a 750W in this series.
Which Power Supply Should I Buy?
Most users will be more than happy with the stellar Corsair RM750x, a great all-round performer with enough juice for everyone. It’s a high-quality fully-modular build with an 80 Plus Gold rating, and as a bonus, it is very quiet.
High-end gamers who need a bit more capacity for that power-hungry GPU should go for its big bro, the Corsair RM850x. Gamers on a budget can’t go wrong with the Cooler Master MasterWatt 650.
Most video editors and streamers can get away with slightly less power. The super silent Seasonic SSR-600TL is perfect for streamers, whilst the EVGA’s SuperNOVA 650 G3 is the strongest performer in its field, and one of the cheapest, suiting video editors.
Finally, those on a strict budget will be best off with Bitfenix BF450G, if they can get away with the lower wattage.
AMD Turion Vs. AMD Athlon | Portátiles
Anonymous
Guest
-
-
#1
Buenas tardes:
Estoy mirando una configuración para un 17″ en la página de DELL y la verdad es que los Intel Core 2 Duo se me van de presupuesto y los AMD son bastante más baratos. El uso que daría al portátil sería internet, office, música, pelis y poco más, nada de juegos ni de diseño, creo que un AMD me valdría.
La pregunta es: ¿que es mejor Turion (más baratos) o Athlon?
Gracias desde ya.
Anonymous
Guest
-
-
#2
Hola. El AMD Turion está diseñado específicamente para ordenadores portátiles, no así como el AMD Athlon. ¿En qué puede verse esto reflejado? Pues por ejemplo en la duración de la batería o en el rendimiento, es decir, el Turion tiene la desventaja de que te dará menor rendimiento que el Athlon, puesto que tiene menos componentes en la CPU, pero la principal ventaja es que también consume menos que el Athlon, y eso hará que te dure más tiempo la batería.
Tu elección depende del uso que le vayas a dar. Si es solamente lo que has dicho (sin juegos ni cosas de ese estilo) yo te recomendaría un Turion de 64 bits (y si es posible que sea con doble núcleo, X2, que se nota bastante).
Un saludo, espero haberte ayudado
Anonymous
Guest
-
-
#3
Muchas gracias «topocerdo»
Al ser un 17″ la movilidad sería casi nula por tanto el tema de la batería no es determinante (aunque si importante). También me gustaría preguntaros por el tema de temperaturas y rendimiento. Aquí tenéis los diferentes procesadores.
Una ayudita para elegir, please.
http://www1.euro.dell.com/content/products/features.aspx/inspn_1721?c=es&cs=esdhs1&l=es&s=dhs
MUUUUUUUUUUCHAS GRACIAS!!!
Anonymous
Guest
-
-
#4
Hola de nuevo. Yo te recomendaría de cara al futuro el más completo (el de 849 €), por una razón: los 2 tienen más o menos las mismas prestaciones, pero por 150 € más tienes un procesador algo mejor, 1 GB más de RAM y 40 GB más de disco duro, y eso dentro de un tiempo lo puedes agradecer. ..
En cuanto a consumo eléctrico, prácticamente los 2 procesadores que me dices consumen lo mismo. La temperatura que alcanzan es lo que ya no sé decirte, pero supongo que será muy similar la de ambos. Te paso una web en la que puedes ver las comparativas de los procesadores AMD Turion X2:
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Turion_64_X2
En esta otra ya puedes ver información más específica ofrecida por AMD:
http://www.amd.com/es-es/Processors/Pro … 09,00.html
Saludos
alex555
Usuari@ ADSLzone
-
-
#5
Si buscas un AMD, opta por los Turion X2, lo Athlon son mas antiguos, tambien puedes mirarte los CoreDuo, que son mas baratos que los Core2Duo, en AMD, minimo un TL-52 e Intel, CoreDuo T2080, para el uso que le daras, tienes micro de sobra con ambos modelos anteriormente citados.
Saludos
Comparison of AMD Athlon 64 L110 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 L110 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
AMD Athlon 64 L110
versus
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Advantages
reasons to select AMD Athlon 64 L1110
- Reveal processor, difference in production dates 2 year (s)
24 June 2009 vs 4 May 2007 |
Reasons to choose AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
- 1 more cores, ability to run more applications simultaneously: 2 vs 1
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- About 67% more clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1. 2 GHz
- 2x L2 cache(s) more means more data can be saved in it for quick access
- 3.1 times more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 694 vs 223
- 3.1 times more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 606 vs 197
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz |
Level 2 cache | 1 MB vs 512 KB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 694 vs 223 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 606 vs 197 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 L110
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
Name | AMD Athlon 64 L110 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 223 | 694 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 197 | 606 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 193 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 335 |
Performance comparison
AMD Athlon 64 L110 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 | |
---|---|---|
Production date | 24 June 2009 | May 4, 2007 |
Place in the ranking | 2691 | 2478 |
Series | AMD Athlon 64 | AMD Turion 64 X2 Dual-Core Mobile Technology |
Applicability | Laptop | Laptop |
Architecture name | Trinidad / Tyler | |
Family | AMD Turion | |
OPN Tray | TMDTL60HAX5DM | |
Support 64 bit | ||
System bus (FSB) | 800MHz | 800MHz |
Level 2 cache | 512KB | 1MB |
Maximum frequency | 1. 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
Number of threads | 1 | 2 |
Base frequency | 2 GHz | |
Crystal area | 147mm | |
Level 1 cache | 256KB | |
Process | 90 / 65 nm | |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | |
Number of transistors | 154 Million | |
Unlocked | ||
Supported memory frequency | 667MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR2 | |
Supported sockets | S1 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 — frwiki.
wiki
The Athlon 64 X2 is a standard dual-heart microprocessor proposed by AMD as a result of the evolution of performance competition that turns away from the race for frequency to start multithreading. Starting with the second generation of the Brisbane series, dual-core microprocessors are now called Athlon X2 .
Launched in April — May 2005, AMD chose a policy radically different from that of its rival Intel, which chose to combine two Prescott cores on a single die to develop its Pentium Ds. From their point of view, the AMD X2 cores use the same memory controller and can therefore communicate with each other without having to go over the HyperTransport link. They also have their own L2 cache and shared L3 cache for K10 9 cores0386 ( Kuma ). Finally, the Athlon X2 supports the same socket as the Athlon, unlike the Intel Pentium D, and supports all of Intel’s software optimizations for Hyperthreading.
Summary
-
1 Athlon 64X2
- 1. 1 Manchester
- 1.2 Toledo
-
1.3 Windsor
- 1.3.1 Standard
- 1.3.2 Energy efficiency
- 1.3.3 Energy Efficient Small Form Factor
- 1.4 Brisbane
-
2 Athlon X2
- 2.1 Brisbane
-
2.2 Kuma
- 2.2.1 Prototypes
- 2.2.2 Final models
-
3 applications
- 3.1 External links
- 3.2 Notes
- 3.3 Links
Athlon 64 X2
Manchester
Athlon X2 logo
MMX extended 3DNow! , SSE , SSE2 , SSE3 , AMD64 , Cool’n’Quiet , NX Bit
Cores The Toledo and Manchester launched AMD’s line of dual-core processors in 2005 in response to Intel’s development of the Pentium D. Although the Manchester series entered the market after the Toledo, it is distinguished by an earlier version (E4), but above all by a smaller L2 cache.
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult. | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4600+ | 2.4 GHz | 2×512 KB | E4 | x12 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 110 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4600DAA5BV | |
4200+ | 2.2 GHz | 2×512 KB | E4 | x11 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4200DAA5BV | |
3800+ | 2. 0 GHz | 2×512 KB | E4 | x10 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA3800DAA5BV | |
3600+ | 2.0 GHz | 2×256 KB | E4 | x10 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s |
Toledo
MMX extended 3DNow! , SSE , SSE2 , SSE3 , AMD64 , Cool’n’Quiet , NX Bit
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult. | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4800+ | 2.4 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | E6 | x12 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 110 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4800DAA6CD | |
4600+ | 2.4 GHz | 2×512 KB | E6 | x12 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 110 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4600DAA5CD | |
4400+ | 2. 2 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | E6 | x11 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 110 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4400DAA6CD | |
4200+ | 2.2 GHz | 2×512 KB | E6 | x11 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4200DAA5CD | |
3800+ | 2. 0 GHz | 2×512 KB | E6 | x10 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA3800DAA5CD |
Windsor
Cool’n’Quiet , MMX , 3DNow! extended , SSE , SSE2 , SSE3 , x86-64 , NX bit , AMD Virtualization
Standard
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6400+ Black Edition | 3.2 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F3 | unlocked | 1. 35 — 1.40 V | 125 W | 1000 MT/s | ADX6400IAA6CZ | |
6000+ | 3.0 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F3 | x15 | 1.35 — 1.40 V | 125 W | 1000 MT/s | ADX6000IAA6CZ | |
6000+ | 3.0 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F3 | x15 | 1. 30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA6000IAA6CZ | |
5600+ | 2.8 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F3 | x14 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA5600IAA6CZ | |
5400+ | 2.8 GHz | 2×512 KB | F3 | x14 | 1. 30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA5400IAA5CZ | |
5200+ | 2.6 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F2 F3 |
x13 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADA5200IAA6CS ADA5200IAA6CZ |
|
5000+ | 2.6 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 F2 F3 |
x13 | 1. 20 — 1.25 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADA5000IAA5CS ADA5000IAA5CU ADA5000IAA5CZ |
|
4800+ | 2.4 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F2 | x12 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4800IAA6CS | |
4600+ | 2.4 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 | x12 | 1. 30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4600IAA5CU | |
4400+ | 2.2 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F2 | x11 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4400IAA6CS | |
4200+ | 2.2 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 | x11 | 1. 30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4200IAA5CU | |
4000+ | 2.0 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F2 | x10 | 1.30 — 1.35 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA4000IAA6CS | |
3800+ | 2.0 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 | x10 | 1. 20 — 1.25 V | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADA3800IAA5CU |
Energy efficient
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5200+EE | 2.6 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F3 | x13 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO5200IAA6CZ | |
5000+ EE | 2. 6 GHz | 2×512 KB | F3 | x13 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO5000IAA5CZ | |
4800+EE | 2.4 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 | x12 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO4800IAA6CS | |
4600+EE | 2. 4 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 F2 F3 |
x12 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO4600IAA5CS ADO4600IAA5CU ADO4600IAA5CZ |
|
4400+EE | 2.2 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F2 | x11 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO4400IAA6CS | |
4200+EE | 2. 2 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 | x11 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO4200IAA5CU | |
4000+ EE | 2.0 GHz | 2 x 1 MB | F2 | x10 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO4000IAA6CS | |
3800+EE | 2. 0 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 F2 F3 |
x10 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO3800IAA5CS ADO3800IAA5CU ADO3800IAA5CZ |
|
3600+EE | 2.0 GHz | 2×256 KB | F2 | x10 | 1.20 — 1.25 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO3600IAA4CU |
Energy Efficient Small Form Factor
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3800+ EE-SFF | 2. 0 GHz | 2×512 KB | F2 | x10 | 1.075 — 1.100V 1.025 — 1.075V |
35 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADD3800IAA5CU ADD3800IAT5CU |
Brisbane
MMX , extended 3DNow! , SSE , SSE2 , SSE3 , AMD64 , Cool’n’Quiet , NX Bit , AMD virtualization
Brisbane is Conservative Windsor. It features fine engraving, as well as a smaller L2 cache, which is explained by AMD’s desire to respond as quickly as possible to sufficiently high demand. Indeed, the manufacturing process of the processor is faster if the cache is reduced. Also, the steps are 100 MHz, instead of 200 MHz, as on Windsor, which allows you to get multipliers in x, 5.
According to the nomenclature, the term EE (energy efficiency) is associated with Brisbane. This element is confusing because the Brisbane series does not actually have EE models, but is explained by a TDP similar to the EE Windsor models (65 W ).
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult. | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5800+ | 2×512 KB | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO5800IAA5DO | |||||
5600+ | 2×512 KB | 89 W | 1000 MT/s | ||||||
5600+ | 2. 9 GHz | 2×512 KB | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | |||||
5400+ | 2.8 GHz | 2×512 KB | G2 | x14 | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO5400IAA5DO | ||
5200+ | 2.7 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x13. 5 | 1.300 — 1.325 — 1.350 V 1.325 — 1.350 — 1.375 V |
65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO5200IAA5DD ADO5200IAA5DO |
|
5000+ Black Edition | 2.6 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 | unlocked | 1.25 — 1.35 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO5000IAA5DS | |
5000+ | 2. 6 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x13 | 1.300 — 1.325 — 1.350 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO5000IAA5DD ADO5000IAA5DO |
|
4800+ | 2.5 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x12.5 | 1.300 — 1.325 — 1.350 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO4800IAA5DD ADO4800IAA5DO |
|
4600+ | 2. 4 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x12 | 1.30 — 1.325 — 1.35 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ||
4400+ | 2.3 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x11.5 | 1.25 — 1.30 — 1.35V 1.325 — 1.350 — 1.375V |
65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO4400IAA5DD ADO4400IAA5DO |
|
4200+ | 2. 2 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x11 | 1.250 — 1.300 — 1.325 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO4200IAA5DD ADO4200IAA5DO |
|
4000+ | 2.1 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 | x10.5 | 1.250 — 1.300 — 1.325 V | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | ADO4000IAA5DD | |
3800+ | 2. 0 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 | x10 | 65 W | 1000 MT/s | |||
3600+ | 1.9 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 | x9.5 | 1.20 — 1.25 — 1.30 V 1.20 — 1.30 — 1.35 V |
65 W | 1000 MT/s |
ADO3600IAA5DD ADO3600IAA5DL |
Athlon X2
The arrival of the second generation of the Brisbane series is accompanied by a change in terminology. Indeed, the dual-core Athlon loses the 64 term and becomes the Athlon X2. This change follows the generalization of 64-bit processors in the AMD catalog.
Brisbane
MMX, extended 3DNow! , SSE , SSE2 , SSE3 , AMD64 , Cool’n’Quiet , NX Bit , AMD virtualization
With the announcement of K10 architecture processors, AMD is changing the nomenclature of this second generation Brisbane to BE-2xxx. Improved manufacturing processes allow the founder to offer processors with permanent engraving (65nm), TDP and lower voltage.
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult. | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE-2400 | 2.3 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x11. 5 | 1.15 — 1.2 — 1.25V 1.25V |
45 W | 2000 MT/s |
ADh3400IAA5DD ADh3400IAA5DO |
|
BE-2350 | 2.1 GHz | 2×512 KB | G1 G2 |
x10.5 | 1.15 — 1.2 — 1.25 V | 45 W | 2000 MT/s |
ADh3350IAA5DD ADh3350IAA5DO |
|
BE-2300 | 1.9 GHz | 2 x 512 KB | G1 G2 |
x9. 5 | 1.15 — 1.2 — 1.25 V | 45 W | 2000 MT/s |
ADh3300IAA5DD ADh3300IAA5DO |
In the second quarter of 2008, AMD is once again reviewing its nomenclature to better match the nomenclature of its K10 line based on the Kuma (6xx0) generation. In addition, their denomination is very similar to that of the first Brisbane generations in terms of frequency. While version 4850 e is new, 4450 e and 4050 e are actually rebranded BE-2400 and BE-2350 models.
Model | Frequency | L2 cache | Revision | Mult. | Voltage | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Athlon X2 standard | ||||||||||
5050th | 2. 6 GHz | 2×512 KB | G2 | x13 | 1.15 — 1.25 V | 45 W | ADH5050IAA5DO | |||
4850th | 2.5 GHz | x12.5 | ADh5850IAA5DO | |||||||
4450th | 2.3 GHz | x11. 5 | 2000 MT/s | ADh5450IAA5DO | ||||||
4050s | 2.1 GHz | x10.5 | 2000 MT/s | ADh5050IAA5DO | ||||||
Athlon X2 Low Power | ||||||||||
4200+ | 2 x 512 KB | 35 W | 2 d cut. 2008 | |||||||
3600+ | 2×512 KB | 35 W | 2 d cut. 2008 | |||||||
3400th | 2×512 KB | 22 W | 2 d cut. 2008 |
Kuma
Prototypes
AMD has developed a dual-core version of its K10 architecture called Kuma. The first range includes three models: GE-6600 (2.3GHz ), GE-6500 (2.1GHz ) and GE-6400 (1.9GHz ), all of which have a TDP of 45W (GE class). Two other higher TDP models 6250 and 6050 were also mentioned (65 W ), but without specifying their frequency. Despite a timid appearance on some online sales sites a year later, these models were finally abandoned. The lack of communication and marketing almost a year after the quad-core models leads to rumors about the final abandonment of the dual-core K10 at 65 nm . Rumors that were later denied by AMD.
Final Models
Finally, AMD sold two models in early 2009 and then added a third in April. The delay in their marketing is the result of many internal discussions debating interest in going out of this range because Kuma is being penalized by their performance and low sales of Toliman’s tri-core models. In reality, Kuma is none other than Phenom, who has two of his hearts deactivated. This configuration, of course, allows you to limit losses at the end of the production chain, but increases the consumption and heating of the processor. In addition, their marketing is adjacent to that of the Phenom II engraved 45 nm , so interest in such a proposal is limited, especially since versions of the Athlon II were scheduled for the next quarter.
Model | Number of cores |
Frequency | Hidden | Mult. | Voltage | Revision | TDP | Hypertransport | Help | Marketing | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | L2 | L3 | Start | End of life | ||||||||||
Athlon X2 7×50 Black Edition | ||||||||||||||
7850 BE | 2 | 2.8 GHz | 2 × 128 KB | 2 x 512 kb | 2 MB | 1. 20 — 1.25 V | B3 | 95 W | 1800 MHz | AD785ZWCJ2BGH | ||||
7750 BE | 2 | 2.7 GHz | 2 × 128 KB | 2 x 512 kb | 2 MB | 1.05 — 1.325 V | B3 | 95 W | 1800 MHz | AD775ZWCJ2BGH | ||||
Athlon X2 7×50 | ||||||||||||||
7550 | 2 | 2. 5 GHz | 2 × 128 KB | 2 x 512 kb | 2 MB | 1.05 — 1.325 V | B3 | 95 W | 1800 MHz | AD7550WCJ2BGH | ||||
7450 | 2 | 2.4 GHz | 2 × 128 KB | 2 x 512 kb | 2 MB | 1. 05 — 1.325 V | B3 | 95 W | 1800 MHz | AD7450WCJ2BGH |
Test List for Athlon X2 — Kuma
- 7850 BE
- (en) Anandtech , bit-tech.net , Bjorn3d.com , guru3d , « http://en.hardspell.com/doc/enshowcont.asp?id=5801&pageid=3948 HarSpell » ( Archive • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • What to do? ) , Overclockers Club
- 7750 BE
- (fr) Clubic, Hardware.fr, Matbe.
- 7550
- (ru) Matbe .
- 6500?
- (en) Expreview .
Applications
External links
- (en) Athlon X2 64 — K8 on CPU World
Notes
- ↑ This configuration allows the Phenom II image to unlock two inactive cores, as stated on the Korean site GiggleHD.com.
- ↑ There is also a non-BE version with part number part of the AD775ZWCJ2BGH processor.
Recommendations
- ↑ (ru) Julien Jay. Test AMD/Intel melee for dual core on Clubic 1 — th August 2005.
- ↑ (in) Test. AMD 6000+ AM2 X2 Processor at OverclockerClub, August 20, 2007
- ↑ (fr) Stéphane Charpentier. Athlon 64 X2: Brisbane (65nm ) vs. Windsor (20nm ) on matba, December 20, 2006
- ↑ (ru) Anand Lal Shimpi. Testing 65- nm AMD Cores Brisbane Preview: Reviews AMD’s most power efficient processor to date at AnandTech, December 14, 2006
- ↑ a and b (ru) Anand Lal Shimpi. Test AMD 65 nm Preview, Part 2 — Plot Enhanced (Updated with AMD info) at AnandTech, December 21, 2007
- ↑ a and b (c) Scott Wasson. Test Overview 65- nm AMD Athlon 64 X2 Processors in Technical Report, December 20, 2006
- ↑ (ru) Julien Jay. Testing AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Brisbane 90 nm vs 65 nm at Clubic Jan 10, 2007
- ↑ (ru) C. Sun. Testing AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ 65 nm processor. Reviewed at PCStats, March 7, 2007
- ↑ (in) AMD Athlon™ Dual Core 45W Processor — AMD FAQ
- ↑ (in) Jeff Button. Testing AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 and BE-2300 «Brisbane» Processors at HotHardware, June 5, 2007
- ↑ (in) Hubert Wong. Test AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 at VIPERLAI R.com, June 5, 2007
- ↑ (ru) David Legrand. Undervoltage X2 BE-2350: possible and very useful? on INpact PC, July 20, 2007
- ↑ (ru) David Legrand. PCi: TR Ultra 120 eXtreme passive and BE-2350, a dream? on INpact PC, July 14, 2007
- ↑ a b c ( f ) Bruno Cormier. AMD Launches Athlon X2 22 W in PC Storage Industry INpact.com, April 7, 2008
- ↑ Bruno Cormier. AMD Prepares Phenom X2 GE Lineup: TDP 45 W on INpact PC, July 4, 2007
- ↑ Bruno Cormier. AMD expects the tri-core Phenom to arrive in February 2008 at PC INpact on November 29, 2007.
- ↑ David Legrand. Will the Phenom X2 from the GE line go on sale soon? on PC INpact, August 27, 2008
- ↑ David Legrand. AMD Denies Canceling Their Dual-Core K10 on INpact PC June 13, 2008
AMD Processors |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current |
|
||||||||||
Abandoned |
|
||||||||||
Microarchitectures |
|
||||||||||
Sockets |
|
||||||||||
wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAutoLogin/start?type=1×1″ alt=»» title=»»>
AMD Athlon 64 X2 — gebiao-medical. com
This article is about the AMD Athlon 64 X2 desktop processor. For the mobile processor of the same name, see AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Mobile).
AMD Athlon 64 X2 is a microprocessor for computers. He belongs to the K9 generationand is a dual-core variant with the Athlon 64.
Since mid-2007, AMD has also been offering notebook processors under the name Athlon 64 X2. While these mobile processors are related to the desktop Athlon 64 X2, they are based on a different processor core and were only offered for a different processor socket.
contents
- 1 General
- 2 production
- 3 Black Edition
- 4 successors
-
5 Model database 939
- 5.1 Manchester
- 5.2 Toledo
-
6 Model AM2 database
- 6.1 Energy classes
- 6.2 Windsor
- 6. 3 Brisbane
- 7 incompatibilities with Windows 8.1 / 10 64 bit
- 8 See also
- 9 individual proofs
General
The Athlon 64 X2 contains two processor cores and behaves like a two processor system from a software point of view. This means that performance gains can only be achieved by using multiple programs at the same time, unless specially adapted programs are used.
The processor was designed for Socket 939 and Socket AM2 and has a dual-channel memory controller (DDR for Socket 939, DDR2 for Socket AM2) that is shared by both cores. The processor also served as the basis for AMD LIVE! .
production
AMD also offered special versions of the corresponding processor cores with partially disabled L2 cache. The reason for this was that it often happened during production that part of the L2 cache was faulty. Because the processor was actually healthy, the failed part of the cache was deactivated.
There have also been cases where a defect in one of the processor cores deactivated it, and the processor was then sold as a single-core Athlon 64 or Athlon processor.
Black Edition
AMD has offered the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ (based on the Brisbane core) a so-called «Black Edition», which, like the Athlon 64 FX, has an open top multiplier. This provides relatively easy overclocking. With this affordable product, AMD is directly targeting the target group of hardware enthusiasts. Black Edition processors were produced in the new G2 stepping.
However, the addition of the Black Edition does not automatically mean a randomly selected multiplier. The Athlon 64 X2 6400+, which was also available as a «Black Edition», does not have this feature. However, AMD enthusiasts also liked this processor because it was AMD’s fastest desktop processor for a long time before the introduction of the K10 processors.
successor to
In 2009, the Athlon 64 X2 processors were replaced by processors based on the K10 architecture and removed from the market. Prior to this, the Athlon 64 X2 and Athlon X2 processors were offered alongside the new AMD Phenom and AMD Athlon II processors.
Data socket model 939
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Rev. E6)
All processors for Socket 939 have a dual channel memory controller (128 bit, dual channel operation) for DDR-SDRAM.
Manchester
Dual-core processor
- Revision E4
- L1 cache: per core 64 + 64 KB (data + instructions)
- L2 Cache: 512 KB per core with
- MMX, extended 3DNow! , SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool’n’Quiet, NX-Bit
- Socket 939, HyperTransport @ 1.0 GHz (HT 2000)
- Manufacturing technology: 90 nm ( SOI )
- Size: 147 mm² with 154.0 million transistors
- Clock frequencies: 2.0-2.4 GHz
- Models: Athlon 64 X2 3600+ to 4600+
processor speed
Toledo
Dual Core
- Revision E6
- L1 cache: per core 64 + 64 KB (data + instructions)
- L2 cache: per 512 or 1024 KB core with processor clock speed
- MMX, extended 3DNow! , SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool’n’Quiet, NX-Bit
- Socket 939, HyperTransport @ 1. 0 GHz (HT 2000)
- Manufacturing technology: 90 nm ( SOI )
- Size: 199 mm² with 233.2 million transistors
- Clock frequencies: 2.0-2.4 GHz
- Models: Athlon 64 X2 3800+ to 4800+
Model AM2 data socket
AM2 socket
All processors for socket AM2 have a dual channel (128 bit, dual channel) memory controller for DDR2-SDRAM.
Energy classes
The AMD Athlon 64 X2 has been manufactured in different energy classes. The distinction between models is only possible based on the OPN . This number is located on the processor package under the processor designation.
Start OPN | maximum power input | Energy class |
ADDxxxxxxxxxx | 35 W | EE SFF |
ADHxxxxxxxxxx | 45 W | be |
ADOxxxxxxxxxx | 65 W | EE |
ADAxxxxxxxxxx | 89 W | default |
ADXxxxxxxxxxx | 125 W | SE |
Abbreviations
- EE : E nergy E fficient means that the CPU consumes less power compared to this and therefore the power loss is lower.
- SFF : S mall F orm F means that the power loss is again significantly reduced compared to EE. Therefore, the CPU requires less complicated cooling and is therefore suitable for small computer cases.
Windsor
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Rev. F2)
Dual-core processor
- Revision F2, F3
- L1 cache: per core 64 + 64 KB (data + instructions)
- L2 Cache: per 512 or 1024 KB core with CPU clock speed
- Memory controller: dual channel DDR2-SDRAM
- MMX, extended 3DNow! , SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool’n’Quiet, NX-Bit, AMD-V
- Socket AM2, HyperTransport @ 1.0 GHz (HT 2000)
- Manufacturing technology: 90 nm ( SOI )
- Size: 183mm² with 153.8M transistors (512 KiB L2 cache physically available)
- Die size: 230 mm², 227.4 million transistors (1024 KB L2 cache physically available)
- Clock frequencies: 2. 0-3.2 GHz
- Models: Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE to 6400+ Black Edition
Brisbane
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+, Brisbane.
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ without integrated heatsink
Dual core processor
- Edition G1, G2
- L1 cache: per core 64 + 64 KB (data + instructions)
- L2 Cache: 512 KB per core with
- Memory controller: dual channel DDR2-SDRAM
- MMX, extended 3DNow! , SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool’n’Quiet, NX-Bit, AMD-V
- Socket AM2, HyperTransport @ 1.0 GHz (HT 2000)
- Manufacturing technology: 65 nm ( SOI )
- Size: 118 mm² with 221 million
- Clock frequencies: 1.9-3.1 GHz
- Models: Athlon 64 X2 3600+ to 6000+
processor speed
transistors
Incompatible with Windows 8.1 / 10 64 bit
Athlon 64 / X2 and Sempron versions for socket 939/940 do not support the so called CMPXCHG16b instructions which are required by Windows 8. 1/10 x64. For 64-bit versions of Windows 7 and 8.0, Microsoft has programmed a software workaround in the Windows kernel that was removed from Windows 8.1 for security reasons. As an alternative to modern Windows, it is possible to work with a 32-bit version. However, it can only address a maximum of 4 GB of RAM. Processors for socket AM2 and later support the necessary instructions.
See also
- List of AMD Athlon 64 X2 processors
Individual evidence
- ↑ Windows 8.1: No support for some older AMD processors. October 24, 2013, accessed June 21, 2019.
AMD • AMD History • AMD Microprocessor List • Order Part Numbers (OPN)
Microarchitectures |
Am29000 • Am286 • Am386 • Am486 • 5×86 • K5 • K6 • K6-2 • K6-III • K7 • K8 / K8L • K9• K10 • Bobcat • Bulldozer • Jaguar • Steamroller • Puma • Zen/Zen+ • Zen 2 • Zen 3 |
||||||||||
Technology |
AMD64 • AMD-V • HSA • Mantle • live! • Quad FX • QuantiSpeed • Turbo Core |
||||||||||
Ryzen |
|
||||||||||
APU Fusion |
|
||||||||||
Opteron |
|
||||||||||
Hairdryer |
|
||||||||||
Athlon |
|
||||||||||
Turion |
|
||||||||||
Sempron |
|
||||||||||
Duron |
|
||||||||||
Geode |
|
||||||||||
Alchemy |
|
||||||||||
Chipsets |
690 series • 700 series • 800 series • 900 series • AM4 chipsets • STRX4 chipsets |
AMD FX • AMD K10 Processor List (Desktop)