Athlon 64 x2 tk 55: Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 [in 2 benchmarks]

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 [in 2 benchmarks]

AMD
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

Buy

Interface

Core clock speed

Max video memory

Memory type

Memory clock speed

Maximum resolution

Summary

This is a Taylor / Hawk-256 architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 65 manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1800 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is processor with a TDP of 31 Watt.

We have no data on Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 benchmark results.

General info

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	not rated
Market segment	Laptop
Series	2x Athlon 64
Architecture codename	Taylor / Hawk-256
Release date	no data
Current price	$18. 49	of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L)

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2
Boost clock speed	1.8 GHz	of 6 (Core i9-13900KS)
Bus support	667 MHz
Chip lithography	65 nm	of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
64 bit support	+
Windows 11 compatibility	—

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Thermal design power (TDP)

31 Watt

of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

3DMark06 CPU

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
518

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
1316

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, according to our PC configuration statistics.

Radeon
Xpress 1150

14.3%

Radeon
Xpress X1200

14.3%

GeForce
7000M + nForce 610M

11. 4%

Mobility
Radeon HD 2400

11.4%

GeForce
7000M

8.6%

Mobility
Radeon X2300

5.7%

Radeon
Xpress 1250

5.7%

GeForce
8400M G

2.9%

Radeon HD
5450

2.9%

Radeon RX
6900

2.9%

These are the fastest graphics cards for Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 in our user configuration statistics.

There is a total of 35 configurations based on Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 in our database.

GeForce GTX
1650 SUPER

2.9% (1/35)

GeForce
9600 GT

2.9% (1/35)

GeForce
9800 GT

2.9% (1/35)

GeForce
610M

2.9% (1/35)

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK 55 TK-55 AMDTK55HAX4DC 1.8GHz Socke

Consultation +49 2 31 / 47 77 77 57

Fast delivery

Free Shipping — from 500€ within Germany

JavaScript is disabled! Not all shop functions are available. Please check your browser settings.

AllHardwareComputerPrinter / ScannerElectric ComponentsSpare PartsPhoto & VideoMobile, Phone & PDACables & adaptersMonitor / TFT / projectorLaptops / TabletsGame consoles & accessoriesTV & Audio

Home
Languages
Your account
Shopping cart

E-mail address:

Password:

AfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegowinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEast TimorEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Faroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-bissauGuyanaHaitiHeard and Mc Donald IslandsHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran (Islamic Republic of)IraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Republic ofKosovoKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacauMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth MacedoniaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarReunionRomaniaRussian FederationRwandaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpainSri LankaSt. HelenaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan Mayen IslandsSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailandTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVatican City State (Holy See)VenezuelaViet NamVirgin Islands (British)Virgin Islands (U.S.)Wallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZaireZambiaZimbabwe

90,000 characteristics AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55: TESTS, competitors, price

Home Processor Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55

Number of cores — 2.

The base frequency of Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55 cores is 1.8 GHz.

Price in Russia

Want to buy Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55 cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.

Family

Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53

Benchmarks AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55

Game Speed

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed in office use

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CAD programs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed in heavy applications

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.

Speed of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Minimum	Average	Maximum
26	Memory: 49	66 9007
Memory 50.6
13	1 core: 25	27
1 core 10. 6
23	2 cores: 45	53
2 cores 9.9

Demanding games and tasks

Minimum	Average	Maximum
23	4 Cores: 46	53
4 cores 5.1
22	8 cores: 47	53
8 cores 2. 7

Extreme

Minimum	Average	Maximum
23	All Cores: 47	53 9007
All cores 0.9

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Compare

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.