Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/athlon-xp-3000-plus%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
12100F
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/athlon-xp-3000-plus%23benchmarks
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
12100F
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ — 16 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
- Number of Cores
PassMark CPU
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ score:
248
Best score:
89379
Test results
AMD Athlon XP 3000+:
1942
Best score:
Performance
AMD Athlon XP 3000+:
882
Best score:
Interfaces and communications
AMD Athlon XP 3000+:
500
Best score:
Main Features of
AMD Athlon XP 3000+:
1581
Best score:
Description
In this case, the maximum frequency in Boost mode reaches 2.17 Hz. 1 cores available. The L1 cache is 128 KB, L2 0. 512 MB and L3 1 MB. Power consumption at peak times can reach 68 watts.
The maximum number of threads that AMD Athlon XP 3000+ can handle is 1.
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ works on 130 nm architecture. Total number of transistors 63 million
Regarding memory specification.
Now about AMD Athlon XP 3000+ tests. According to PassMark, the processor scored 248 out of a possible score. Based on the analysis of more than 4000 processors, AMD Athlon XP 3000+ took 3728 place in the ranking of the best.
Why AMD Athlon XP 3000+ is better than others
No merits
- PassMark CPU score 248 . This parameter is lower than 51% of products
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 68 W. This parameter is higher than 61% of products
- Process 130 nm. This parameter is higher than 91% of products
- Number of transistors 63 million. This parameter is lower than that of 46% of goods
- Number of cores 1 . This parameter is lower than 99% of goods
- Number of flows 1 . This parameter is lower than that of 86% of products
- L2 cache size 0.512 MB. This parameter is lower than that of 66% of products
- L1 cache size 128 KB. This parameter is lower than that of 53% of goods
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ Review
Test results
Performance
Interfaces and communications
Main characteristics
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ Review: Highlights
PassMark CPU score
The PassMark test considers read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
248
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
89379
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
1
max 256
Average: 10.7
256
L1 cache size
Large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in CPU and system performance settings
Show all
128KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
4608KB
L2 Cache Size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
0.512MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
512MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed
When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
2.17GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
5.5GHz
Number of cores
1
max 72
Mean: 5.8
72
Max. number of processors in configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
8
Socket
A
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
130 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
5 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
63 million
max 57000
Average: 1517. 3 million
57000 million
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
Thermal Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
68W
Average: 67.6 W
0.025W
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system, unlike a 32-bit system, can support more than 4 GB of RAM. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all
No
Code name
Barton
Purpose
Desktop
FAQ
How many cores does the AMD Athlon XP 3000+ have?
1 core
What is the AMD Athlon XP 3000+ socket
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ is installed using A.
Is the AMD Athlon XP 3000+ a 64-bit processor?
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ is based on the Barton architecture.
What is the maximum frequency of the AMD Athlon XP 3000+ processor?
In this case, the maximum frequency in Boost mode reaches 2.17 Hz.
How big is the AMD Athlon XP 3000+ cache?
L1 cache is 128 KB, L2 0.512 MB and L3 1 MB.
How many watts does the AMD Athlon XP 3000+ consume?
Power consumption at peak times can be up to 68 watts.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i5-12450H
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i5-12400
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i5-12600T
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i3-12300
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i7-12800H
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i7-1260P
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i5-1245U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i5-1235U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Core i7-1265U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Pentium Gold G7400
Intel Core i7-980XEE
VS
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
Intel Celeron G6900
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
leave your feedback
Comparison AMD Athlon XP 3000+ vs AMD Athlon 64 4000+ which is better?
General | |
Type |
|
Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture code name |
|
Barton | San Diego |
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
1 | 1 |
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
1 | 1 |
Process |
|
130 nm | 130 nm |
Chip size |
|
101 mm2 | 230 mm2 |
Number of transistors |
|
63 million | 233 million
170 million (269.8%) better than |
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
2.17GHz | 2.6 GHz
Better than at 0. 43 GHz (19.8%) |
Support 64 bit |
|
Max. number of processors in configuration |
|
1 | 1 |
Socket |
|
A | 939 |
Release price |
|
$78
-82 $ (-51.2%) better than |
160 $ |
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
0.5% | 4.1%
3.6% (720%) better than |
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. |
|
128 Kb | 128 Kb |
Level 2 cache |
|
512 KB | 512K |
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output indicates the average heat dissipation in load operation, |