Celeron g3930 vs c2q q9300: Please click the green button to continue.

Celeron G3930 vs Core 2 Quad Q9300

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core 2 Quad Q9300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core 2 Quad Q9300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 3221 days newer than the cheaper Core 2 Quad Q9300.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930

• Performs up to 14% better in Dishonored 2 than Core 2 Quad Q9300 — 174 vs 153 FPS
• Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 — 51 vs 95 Watts
• Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 doesn’t have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

• Up to 62% cheaper than Celeron G3930 — $38.1 vs $99.16
• Up to 56% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Celeron G3930 — $0.25 vs $0.57 per FPS
• Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 — 4 vs 2 threads

Dishonored 2

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

---

FPS

174

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0. 57/FPS

-28%

Price, $

$99.16

38%

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G3930 2.9 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread CPU Processor 2M 51W LGA 1151

Buy for $99.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 45 minutes ago

Core 2 Quad Q9300

Desktop • Mar 10th, 2008

---

FPS

153

86%

Value, $/FPS

$0.25/FPS

100%

Price, $

$38.1

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 SLAMX SLAWE 2.5GHz 6MB CPU Processor LGA775

Buy for $38.1 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 45 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

Core 2 Quad Q9300

Desktop • Mar 10th, 2008

211

FPS

184

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

855

FPS

755

FPS

League of Legends

369

FPS

322

FPS

VALORANT

226

FPS

196

FPS

Apex Legends

228

FPS

200

FPS

Fortnite

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

---

Single-Core

688

100%

Multi-Core

1263

100%

Core 2 Quad Q9300

Desktop • Mar 10th, 2008

---

Single-Core

Multi-Core

1099

85%

Intel Celeron G3930	vs	Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Jan 3rd, 2017	Release Date	Mar 10th, 2008
Celeron	Collection	Core 2 Quad
Kaby Lake	Codename	Yorkfield
Intel Socket 1151	Socket	Intel Socket 775
Desktop	Segment	Desktop
2	Cores	4
2	Threads	4
2. 9 GHz	Base Clock Speed	2.5 GHz
Non-Turbo	Turbo Clock Speed	Non-Turbo
51 W	TDP	95 W
14 nm	Process Size	45 nm
29.0x	Multiplier	7.5x
Intel HD 610	Integrated Graphics	None
No	Overclockable	No

Intel Celeron G3930 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Celeron G3930 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron G3930 on one side and the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor		Intel Celeron G3930				Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Kaby Lake				Penryn
Core name		Kaby Lake-S				Yorkfield-6M
Family		Celeron 3000				Core 2 Quad 9000
Part number(s), S-Spec		BXC80677G3930, BX80677G3930, SR35K				BX80580Q9300, EU80580PJ0606M, QAKY, SLAMX, SLAWE
Release date		Q1 2017				Q1 2008
Lithography		14 nm+				45 nm
Transistors		—				456. 000.000
Cores		2				4
Threads		2				4
Base frequency		2,9 GHz				2,5 GHz
Turbo frequency		—				—
Cache memory		2 MB				6 MB
Max memory capacity		64 GB				8 GB
Memory types		DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600				DDR2-2800
Max PCIe lanes		16				16
TDP		51 W				95 W
Suggested PSU		600W ATX Power Supply				600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		Intel HD Graphics 610				None
GPU execution units		12				—
GPU shading units		96				—
GPU base clock		350 MHz				—
GPU boost clock		1050 MHz				—
GPU FP32 floating point		201,6 GFLOPS				—
Socket		LGA1151				LGA775
Compatible motherboard		Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard				Socket LGA 775 Motherboard
Maximum temperature		100°C				71. 4°C
CPU-Z single thread		307				227
CPU-Z multi thread		648				911
Cinebench R15 single thread		118				68
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		232				272
PassMark single thread		1.785				1.072
PassMark CPU Mark		2.261				1.945
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		3.324				1.751
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		5. 534				4.917
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		43,7 GFLOPS				45,98 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		109 pts / W				52 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron G3930 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Celeron G3930 is lower. The Intel Celeron G3930 was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300	227 911
Intel Celeron G3930	307 648

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 41%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300	68 272
Intel Celeron G3930	118 232

In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Celeron G3930	1.785 2.261
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300	1.072 1.945

In single core, the difference is 67%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Celeron G3930	3.324 5.534
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300	1.751 4.917

In single core, the difference is 90%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Celeron G3930	3. 581 5.818
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300	1.723 4.385

In single core, the difference is 108%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Celeron G3930	3.202 5.428
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300	1.818 5.177

In single core, the difference is 76%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Intel Celeron G3930 AMD equivalentIntel Core 2 Quad Q9300 AMD equivalent

Comparison of Intel Celeron G3930 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

Comparative analysis of the Intel Celeron G3930 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology , Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).

Intel Celeron G3930

versus

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Celeron G3930

• Newer processor, release date difference 8 year(s) 10 month6

  approximately

  2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz

• Approximately 40% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 71.4°C
• A newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 45 nm
• About 86% less power consumption: 51 Watt vs 95 Watt
• About 65% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1787 vs 1082
• About 15% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 2250 vs 1955
• About 98% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 689 vs 348
• About 18% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1267 vs 1074
• 29. 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 13.874 vs 0.473
• 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark : 126.642 vs 24.465

Release date	January 2017 vs March 2008
Maximum frequency	2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
Maximum core temperature	100°C vs 71.4°C
Process	14 nm vs 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt vs 95 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark	1787 vs 1082
PassMark — CPU mark	2250 vs 1955
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	689 vs 348
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1267 vs 1074
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.874 vs 0.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	126.642 vs 24.465

Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

• 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
• L1 cache is 2x larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
• L2 cache is 12x larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

Number of cores	4 vs 2
Level 1 cache	256 KB vs 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	6144 KB vs 256 KB (per core)

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Celeron G3930
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	13.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	126.642 24.465

Name	Intel Celeron G3930	Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
PassMark — Single thread mark	1787	1082
PassMark — CPU mark	2250	1955
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	689	348
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1267	1074
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	1407
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.874	0.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	126.642	24.465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	4.015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	13.648
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1000
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	1837
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3278
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1000
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	1837
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3278

Performance comparison

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Celeron G3900

47.7 (+30%)

Core2 Quad Q9300

36.7

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Celeron G3900

20.3 (+10%)

Core2 Quad Q9300

18.5

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading up to 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

	Intel Celeron G3930	Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Architecture name	Kaby Lake	Yorkfield
Production date	January 2017	March 2008
Place in the ranking	1401	2565
Price now	$51. 17	$49.99
Processor Number	G3930	Q9300
Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Launched	Discontinued
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	17.48	18.63
Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	2. 90 GHz	2.50 GHz
Bus Speed ​​	8 GT/s DMI3	1333 MHz FSB
Level 1 cache	64 KB (per core)	256KB
Level 2 cache	256 KB (per core)	6144KB
Level 3 cache	2048 KB (shared)
Process	14nm	45nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	71 °C
Maximum core temperature	100°C	71. 4°C
Maximum frequency	2.9 GHz	2.5 GHz
Number of cores	2	4
Number of QPI Links	0
Number of threads	2
Crystal area		164 mm2
Number of transistors		456 million
Permissible core voltage		0.8500V-1.3625V
Maximum number of memory channels	2
Maximum memory size	64GB
Supported memory types	DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600 @ 1. 35V	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Device ID	0x5902
Graphics base frequency	350MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1.05 GHz
Maximum GPU clock	1.05 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® Clear Video Technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Video memory size	64GB
Integrated graphics	Intel® HD Graphics 610
Maximum number of monitors supported	3
4K support
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via eDP	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4	[email protected]
DirectX	12
OpenGL	4.4
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in configuration	1	1
Package Size	37.5mm x 37.5mm	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Supported sockets	FCLGA1151	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	95 Watt
Thermal Solution	PCG 2015C (65W)
Number of PCI Express lanes	16
PCI Express revision	3. 0
PCIe configurations	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability	1S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Secure Boot
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Parity FSB
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Simple household tasks

Celeron G3900 45.6 (+53%) Core2 Quad Q9300 29.8

Demanding games and tasks

Celeron G3900 13.4 (+9%) Core2 Quad Q9300 12.3

Extreme

Celeron G3900 2.6 (+8%) Core2 Quad Q9300 2.4

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Passmark

Intel Celeron G3900

2190 (+12%)

Intel Core2 Quad Q9300

1957

Characteristics

Main

Social -appropriations with suitable wards with a suitable coat with suitable coat. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS.	LGA 1151	LGA 775
Manufacturer Firm	Intel	Intel
Presentation datePresentation in mass media, official information.	2015-09-01	2008-03-10
Code name of the Microarchitecture family.	Skylake	Yorkfield
GenerationCode name for the microarchitecture generation.	Celeron (Skylake)	Core 2 Quad (Yorkfield)

Performance

Cores The total number of physical cores.	2	4
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	2	4
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Missing	Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in case of corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	2.8 GHz	2.5 GHz
BCLK System bus frequency. Some motherboards allow you to achieve a good performance boost by slightly raising the bus frequency. Often this has a bad effect on the stability of the system.	100	333
CPU multiplier. The final CPU frequency is determined by the simple formula BCLK * CPU multiplier. Modern processors instantly change the multiplier of each of the cores, taking into account the type of load, temperature, consumption and settings in the BIOS.	28	7.5
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	51W	95 W
tCaseMax Permissible IHS (heat spreading plate, «cover») temperature.	65 °C	71 °C

Cache and RAM

L1 Cache First level cache. Modern processors use a multi-level cache. The first is the fastest, but the smallest. In the case of an L1 access and a miss, the L2 cache is searched for the next stage.	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 Cache Second level cache. Holds more data, but is slower.	256K (per core)	6MB (shared)
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.	DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Dual-channel	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Dual-channel

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.

Intel HD 510

N/A

PCI

PCI-E PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.

Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only)

Gen2

Detailed information

Model Official name.	G3900	Q9300
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.	Skylake	Yorkfield
Chip manufacturer A company that manufactures chips in its own factory.	Intel	Intel
Number of transistors	1,000,000	456,000,000
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied.	14 nm	45 nm
Die size Depends on process technology and number of transistors. For chiplet Ryzen, the area of ​​​​all CCDs is indicated.	150 mm²	2×82 mm²
Spec Code	SR2HV	SLAWE
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.	Intel® Celeron® Processor G3900 (2M Cache, 2.80 GHz)	Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9300 (6M Cache, 2.50 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB)
Instructions	64-bit	64-bit
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.