¿Puede correr el juego GTA V?
Su sistema
Colapsar el bloque
Requisitos oficiales del sistema de GTA V
Este es el hardware aconsejado por los desarrolladores para ejecutar el con los ajustes mínimos y recomendados. Estos requisitos suelen ser muy aproximados, pero pueden utilizarse para determinar el nivel de hardware indicativo que necesitas para jugar al juego.
Los requisitos mínimos
- Tarjeta gráfica:
- NVIDIA 9800 GT 1GB / AMD HD 4870 1GB (DX 10, 10.1, 11)
- Procesador:
- Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs) / AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core Processor (4 CPUs) @ 2.5GHz
- Memoria:
- 4 GB RAM
- Disco duro:
- 72 GB available space
- Sistema operativo:
- Windows 10 64 Bit, Windows 8.
1 64 Bit, Windows 8 64 Bit, Windows 7 64 Bit Service Pack 1
- DirectX:
- 10
Los requisitos recomendados
- Tarjeta gráfica:
- NVIDIA GTX 660 2GB / AMD HD7870 2GB
- Procesador:
- Intel Core i5 3470 @ 3.2GHz (4 CPUs) / AMD X8 FX-8350 @ 4GHz (8 CPUs)
- Memoria:
- 8 GB RAM
- Disco duro:
- 72 GB available space
- Sistema operativo:
- Windows 10 64 Bit, Windows 8.1 64 Bit, Windows 8 64 Bit, Windows 7 64 Bit Service Pack 1
- DirectX:
- 10
Los requisitos mínimos
Los requisitos recomendados
- Tarjeta gráfica:
- NVIDIA 9800 GT 1GB / AMD HD 4870 1GB (DX 10, 10.
1, 11)
- Tarjeta gráfica:
- NVIDIA GTX 660 2GB / AMD HD7870 2GB
- Procesador:
- Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs) / AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core Processor (4 CPUs) @ 2.5GHz
- Procesador:
- Intel Core i5 3470 @ 3.2GHz (4 CPUs) / AMD X8 FX-8350 @ 4GHz (8 CPUs)
- Memoria:
- 4 GB RAM
- Memoria:
- 8 GB RAM
- Disco duro:
- 72 GB available space
- Disco duro:
- 72 GB available space
- Sistema operativo:
- Windows 10 64 Bit, Windows 8.1 64 Bit, Windows 8 64 Bit, Windows 7 64 Bit Service Pack 1
- Sistema operativo:
- Windows 10 64 Bit, Windows 8.
1 64 Bit, Windows 8 64 Bit, Windows 7 64 Bit Service Pack 1
- DirectX:
- 10
- DirectX:
- 10
Calificación del usuario
Aquí puedes ver la calificación del usuario del juego, así como calificarlo tú mismo.
Otros juegos de Rockstar North
Tenemos los requisitos de algunos otros juegos desarrollados por la misma empresa.
GTA: Vice City
GTA IV
Manhunt
Grand Theft Auto IV: Episodes From Liberty City
Juegos como GTA V
Consulta las especificaciones de PC necesarias para otros juegos populares similares al que nos ocupa.
Red Dead Redemption 2
God of War
GTA: San Andreas
Grand Theft Auto III
Okami HD
Metal Gear Solid V
Batman: Arkham City
Batman: Arkham Asylum
Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood
UNCHARTED: Legacy of Thieves Collection
Mafia
Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice VR Edition
Comentarios
Aquí puedes hacer preguntas sobre GTA V, estar de acuerdo o no con nuestras valoraciones, o informar de errores e inexactitudes en el sitio.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
No se ha encontrado la página
No se ha encontrado la página — Technical City
No encontramos esta página en nuestro sitio web: /es/video/geforce-gtx-1080-sli-m%25c3%25b3vel
Comparaciones populares de tarjetas gráficas
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Tarjetas gráficas populares
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Comparaciones populares de procesadores
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Procesadores populares
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
RX 6600 vs RTX 3060: Compare AMD and Nvidia
graphics cards
Radeon RX 6600 XT and GeForce RTX 3060 are standard quality graphics cards from manufacturers AMD and Nvidia, respectively.
Dual GPUs support the latest games at 1440p and deliver outstanding performance without sacrificing graphics quality. On top of that, both Radeon and GeForce support ray tracing out of the box in much newer games. The differences, however, are as follows: the AMD model shines with its DLSS offering, while on the Nvidia device, the client finds FidelityFX and the promise of higher performance.
With associated costs starting from R$ 3,500, the choice between the two cards can be based on a small amount of data. Read the information and find out which plate is best for your situation.
? Razer launches gaming laptop with 240Hz OLED display
The RTX 3060 is Nvidia’s next-generation mid-range processor — Photo: Disclosure/Nvidia
? What’s the best cheap graphics card? Comment on the TecnoBreak 9 discussion forum0003
Between both cards, the Radeon RX 6600 XT is the last one.
Launched in July 2021, the AMD GPU has 2,048 GPU cores and is capable of 1.9GHz base clock, 2.5GHz turbo, and 2.3GHz gaming performance. In addition to the liquid 2048 processors, the AMD card is equipped with 32 cores used to process ray tracing effects.
From Nvidia’s side, the RTX 3060 will hit the market in the first month of 2021. The card has 3,584 CUDA processor cores and can run at the regular stock 1.3GHz or up to 1.7GHz in turbo mode. The GeForce also comes with ray tracing through 28 RT cores and, unlike the AMD variant, also has a boost of 112 Tensor cores used in AI (artificial intelligence) tasks.
An essential aspect for evaluating the GPUs of these cards is that there is no direct comparison of the ratio of cores from one brand to another: AMD and Nvidia develop their own technologies and architectures. Therefore, Radeon cores are not the same as GeForce cores.
However, one point that can be equated much more directly is memory, since the two cards use the same technology. The RTX 3060 comes with 12GB of GDDR6 memory, which is connected to the GPU via 19A 2-bit work platform large enough that these modules can communicate at up to 360 GB/s with a GPU.
As for AMD, the Radeon RX 6600 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory connected via a 128-bit working platform to the processor. Thus, the amount of data exchange between the two elements is 256 GB / s.
Ray tracing is present in both GeForce and Radeon — Photo: Disclosure / Nvidia
In terms of performance, the RX 6600 XT is much faster overall: data summarized User tests of the GPU point to AMD’s overall profit in the 18% range. Until then, performance comparison sites like windows center y ThePCEnthusiast Aim for similar results: Radeon will render slightly more, achieve much higher resolutions, and much more balanced FPS.
The realm is changing in games that are more suited to Nvidia hardware as games that support DLSS and use ray tracing effects tend to run better on the RTX 3060. While AMD is adopting RT graphics at the same time, Radeon has no alternative for DLSS . . A technique that optimizes image quality by improving card performance through AI (artificial intelligence) has not yet been found in the model.
AMD’s FidelityFX doesn’t give the same results as Nvidia’s DLSS — Photo: Brochure/AMD
Both cards are very similar in terms of elements, with a focus on ray tracing support, except for a lot of quirks related to the control program and drivers both GPUs. There are, for example, tools for modifying the map and creating high-definition game screenshots.
One big difference between the two GPUs is free DLSS on Nvidia hardware.
This technique performs a genre of image optimization where the game initially runs at a low resolution, but is displayed on the screen at a much higher resolution. This increase in resolution is driven by AI (Artificial Intelligence) and requires a cleaner screen image and higher performance.
On the AMD side, there is FidelityFX, which wants to achieve exactly the same goal, but without the use of AI (artificial intelligence). AMD’s solution isn’t as advanced as the one used by GeForce and shouldn’t offer the same quality and performance gains.
Much more efficient Radeon, generally much cheaper on energy bills — Photo: Playback/AMD
According to Nvidia, the GeForce RTX 3060 needs 170W to work properly in high-demand situations, higher than the 160W that AMD is counting for the RX 6600 XT.
These measurements are not a direct indicator of electricity consumption, as your electricity bill’s consumption is calculated continuously.
On top of that, it’s really hard for cards to run at peak performance all the time. These values serve as an indicator of the level of efficiency of the cards: Radeon, as we have seen, is much faster and requires less power to operate.
That note aside, both Nvidia and AMD make suggestions when it comes to the power supply you need in your PC to drive the cards. While Nvidia offers a 550W drive, Advanced Micro Devices understands that a 500W PSU is enough to power an entire PC and Radeon.
The RTX 3060 seems much more affordable now — Photo: Disclosure / Nvidia
The two competitors are easy to find in the Spanish market, and their prices fluctuate in the same range. In our searches, we can find RTX 2 in Palit version from 3060 reais. Other release announcements of Galax and Asus were found in our searches for 3.835 reais and 3.699 reais, respectively.
As for the Radeon, we can find prices from 3.499 reais for the XFX version. Another alternative is from ASRock, which is sold in the national market at a price of 3.590 reais. It is important to take into account what our searches think of accredited stores and that they have the opportunity to learn from lower or higher prices in the markets.
Both cards are fairly equivalent in performance and price, and it’s hard to fault one against the other. Perhaps a much more important method, besides possibly prioritizing one brand over the other, could be related to the technologies each card provides: Ray tracing is on both, but it’s favored on GeForce. If the games you love now have DLSS, the RTX 3060 is a superb alternative.
This doesn’t mean that Radeon doesn’t have its merits either. AMD’s trump card is wild performance: The card performs much better and will offer much more performance at levels where ray tracing and DLSS aren’t a concern.
Keeping in mind that most games don’t use these two technologies, the 2XT could be a better alternative as it will perform much better, cost exactly the same price, and generally use less power.
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
| news | Radeon RX 6600 XT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| Publish | July 2021 | January 2021 |
| core | 2048 fluid processors | 3584 CUDA cores |
| Agility | 1.9 GHz, 2.3 GHz (gaming) and 2.5 GHz (turbo) | 1.3 GHz and 1.7 GHz (turbocharged) |
| RAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| memory operability | 16Gb/s | 15 Gb/s |
| working memory platform | 128 bits | 192 bits |
| band width | 256 Gb/s | 360 Gb/s |
| TBF | 160 W | 170 W |
see also : How to find out your motherboard model
How to find out the motherboard model
RX 6600 vs RTX 3050: compare AMD and Nvidia graphics cards
AMD Radeon RX 6600 and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 — two graphics cards for entry-level PCs.
They are intended for players who are passionate about creating games in Full HD, although they have the ability to use even at much higher resolutions, with a certain sacrifice in performance. Both are compatible with Ray Tracing technology, a feature that reproduces light and shadows more accurately in games.
Although these are entry-level models, the GPUs are of a new generation and are priced in the R$2,500 range in the Spanish market. Now we have laid out the basic technical information about the two elements, performance scenarios, and technologies and specifications that allow you to distinguish one from the other, as well as better inform you about the purchase.
? Samsung launches Smart TV with gamer-demanding features; see price
Radeon RX 6600 has 8 GB of memory — Photo: Disclosure / Sapphire
? How to build a gaming PC with the best value for money? A comment on the TecnoBreak discussion forum
The two intermediate cards, AMD and Nvidia cards are similar in many ways, for example in that ray tracing offers hardware at the same time.
Between them, the 2 RX 6600 is much older on the market: Radeon comes with a GPU with 1792 smooth processors organized into 28 balanced objects plus 28 RT cores for ray tracing.
The
GeForce provides a GPU with 2560 CUDA cores and 20 processors for ray tracing effects. Unlike the AMD solution, the Nvidia card also has 80 tensor cores used for AI (artificial intelligence) processing, as well as required for the DLSS application, AI (artificial intelligence) scaling and image reconstruction technology.
The RTX 3050 GPU hit the market in the first month of the year — Photo: Disclosure / Nvidia
In terms of flexibility, AMD runs at much higher clock speeds. The Radeon standard is 1626 MHz turbo to a maximum frequency of 2491 MHz, as well as a game speed range of 2044 MHz.
The situation with RAM is very similar: both are 8 GB GDDR6 cards connected via a 128-bit working platform to the GPU.
This gives both GPUs 224 GB/s of bandwidth to exchange data between the two elements.
Both GPUs support ray tracing — Photo: Disclosure/Nvidia
Both cards are very similar, but overall the RX 6600 is much faster. Results added to GPU User’s Guide they note that the Radeon is on average 7% much faster in normal use and in games, especially considering games that work with non-ray tracing bitmap lighting techniques.
With ray tracing in the scene, the GeForce tends to recover. Nvidia’s technology is much more mature and better supported right now, which could argue for a GeForce 17% advantage in simulation at the same time the light fires.
Both GPUs are very close in terms of elements, but there is a significant difference that can only be found on Nvidia: DLSS. This method uses AI (artificial intelligence) to create a higher resolution final image from a much lower internal resolution, delivering higher quality graphics without significant performance degradation.
Artificial intelligence technology has no analogues in AMD cards yet, but there is an alternative: FSR. This is AMD’s scaling technology, which on the one hand owes the quality and performance gains of DLSS, but has the advantage of being suitable for many more games. In addition, FSR can run on both Radeon and GeForce.
With the same performance, both cards must register similar consumption scenarios. Photo: Disclosure/Asus
Another point of similarity between the two articles has to do with expected power consumption. According to both manufacturers, both GPUs should reach up to 2W when they are in 130% operating mode. This note, it’s handy to remember, doesn’t mean both cards are consuming 100W, as they are unlikely to be used at 130% all the time.
In addition to specifying the amount of power the models need to run, both AMD and Nvidia also list the minimum power supply for your PC.
In both cases, 300 watts are required.
The AMD card is the much more expensive of the two, at least for now and according to our cost research. The Radeon versions produced by AsRock and Sapphire are currently priced at R$2,799, although versions with more information and functionality are likely to cost much more.
GeForce is readily available in the national market starting at R$2.299 in the Palit edition. EVGA, a big colleague of Nvidia, is also bringing a version to market starting at R$2,365, while there are Asus versions for R$2,399.
The two entry-level graphics cards offer very similar levels of performance and features. The performance is on par and both cards will hold your breath for the latest Full HD games with optimal levels of graphical loyalty.
The difference becomes clear when you look at the comparison from other perspectives: do you like games that use DLSS? If so, GeForce works as a much more recommended option.