Intel Pentium E6600 Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser
Benchmark results for the Intel Pentium E6600 can be found below. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser.
Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). Higher scores are better, with double the score indicating double the performance.
CPU Benchmark Scores
377
Single-Core Score
658
Multi-Core Score
Processor Information
| Processor | Intel Pentium E6600 |
| Frequency | 3060 MHz |
| Cores | 2 |
| Threads | 2 |
| TDP | 65 W |
| Codename | Wolfdale |
| Package | LGA775 |
Wolfdale Benchmarks
- Single-Core
- Multi-Core
| Processor | Score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
3. |
800 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
3.2 GHz (2 cores) |
766 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
3.0 GHz (2 cores) |
716 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E6800
3.3 GHz (2 cores) |
710 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
3.1 GHz (2 cores) |
681 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E8300
2.8 GHz (2 cores) |
679 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
2.7 GHz (2 cores) |
677 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E6700
3.2 GHz (2 cores) |
676 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E6600
3.1 GHz (2 cores) |
658 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
2.9 GHz (2 cores) |
657 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E5800
3.2 GHz (2 cores) |
650 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E6500
2. |
635 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E6300
2.8 GHz (2 cores) |
615 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E5700
3.0 GHz (2 cores) |
601 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
2.8 GHz (2 cores) |
600 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
2.7 GHz (2 cores) |
582 |
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
2.5 GHz (2 cores) |
573 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E5500
2.8 GHz (2 cores) |
565 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E5400
2.7 GHz (2 cores) |
554 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E5300
2.6 GHz (2 cores) |
552 |
|
|
Intel Pentium E5200
2.5 GHz (2 cores) |
533 |
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2.6 GHz (2 cores) |
526 |
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2. |
522 |
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2.5 GHz (2 cores) |
505 |
|
|
Intel Celeron E3500
2.7 GHz (2 cores) |
433 |
|
9 GHz (2 cores)
4 GHz (2 cores)Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 on one side and the Intel Pentium Silver N5030 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,4GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,1 GHz.
The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | Intel Pentium Silver N5030 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Entry-level notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Core | Goldmont Plus | ||||||
| Core name | Conroe | Gemini Lake Refresh | ||||||
| Family | Core 2 Duo 6000 | Pentium 5000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80557E6600, |
FH8068003067442, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2006 | Q4 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 291. 000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,4 GHz | 1,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 3,1 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR2-800 |
DDR4/LPDDR4 |
||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 6 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 6 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 18 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 144 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 750 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 230,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA1090 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 775 Motherboard | — | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 60. 1°C |
105°C | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 63 | 82 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 119 | 256 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 127 | 192 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 236 | 488 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 942 | 1.329 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 872 | 2.524 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.475 | 2.200 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
2. 368 |
5.817 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
321 | 485 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
549 | 1.277 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
18,18 GFLOPS | 42,42 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
36 pts / W | 970 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Pentium Silver N5030 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium Silver N5030 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium Silver N5030 is less. The Intel Pentium Silver N5030 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N5030 |
82 256 |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 |
63 119 |
In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 115%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N5030 |
192 488 |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 |
127 236 |
In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 107%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N5030 |
1.329 2.524 |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 |
942 872 |
In single core, the difference is 41%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 189%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N5030 |
2.  2005.817 |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 |
1.475 2.368 |
In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 146%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N5030 |
485 1.  277 |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 |
321 549 |
In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 133%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N5030 |
546 1.554 |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 |
333 591 |
In single core, the difference is 64%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 163%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers.
This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 AMD equivalentIntel Pentium Silver N5030 AMD equivalent
Comparison of Intel Pentium E6600 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium E6600 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Pentium E6600
versus
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium E6600
- Newer processor, 8 month(s) difference in release dates
- can be saved in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 1% higher: 1141 vs 1134
| Issue date | January 2010 vs May 2009 |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1141 vs 1134 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
- L2 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 5% higher: 1270 vs 1209
- Performance in the Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark is approx.
2% more: 400 vs 392 - About 5% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 702 vs 666
| Max frequency | 3.07 GHz vs 3.06 GHz |
| Level 2 cache | 3072 KB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1270 vs 1209 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 400 vs 392 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 702 vs 666 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium E6600
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
| Name | Intel Pentium E6600 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1209 | 1270 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1141 | 1134 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 392 | 400 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 666 | 702 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.756 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.087 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.414 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Pentium E6600 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Wolfdale | Wolfdale |
| Production date | January 2010 | May 2009 |
| Price at first issue date | $16 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2242 | 2748 |
| Price now | $100 | $119. 95 |
| Processor Number | E6600 | E7600 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 5.53 | 4.84 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 06 GHz |
3.06 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 82 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64KB |
| Level 2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 3072KB |
| Technological process | 45nm | 45nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 74.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 06 GHz |
3.07 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | 228 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.8500V — 1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Supported sockets | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
|
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Parity FSB | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Comparison of Intel Pentium E6600 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium E6600 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Pentium E6600
versus
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium E6600
- Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 3 month(s) approx 9019
- The L1 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 9% more: 1209 vs 1108
- About 15% more performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark: 1141 vs 993
- About 4% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 392 vs 377
- Performance in Geekbench4 benchmark — Multi-Core about 3% more: 666 vs 646
3.06 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
| Release date | January 2010 vs October 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 06 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1209 vs 1108 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1141 vs 993 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 392 vs 377 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 666 vs 646 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
- L2 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
| Level 2 cache | 3072 KB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium E6600
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
| Name | Intel Pentium E6600 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1209 | 1108 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1141 | 993 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 392 | 377 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 666 | 646 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.307 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.088 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.081 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.639 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.262 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Pentium E6600 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Wolfdale | Wolfdale |
| Production date | January 2010 | October 2008 |
| Price at first issue date | $16 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2242 | 2815 |
| Price now | $100 | $28. 99 |
| Processor Number | E6600 | E7400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 5.53 | 18.04 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 06 GHz |
2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 82 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64KB |
| Level 2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 3072KB |
| Technological process | 45nm | 45nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 74.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 06 GHz |
2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | 228 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.8500V — 1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Supported sockets | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Package Size | 37.
|