Core i3 vs pentium n3540: Pentium N3540 vs Core i3-6006U [17-Benchmark Showdown]

CPU Specs, Prices, and FPS in Games

Refine results to filter 679 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.

Calculation Parameters


Graphics Card

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Graphics Preset

Upscaling

Native

Ray Tracing

Game Mode

Singleplayer

Sort By

Popularity

Filters


Performance Rating


Value Rating

CPU Type

Desktop

25

Mobile

0

Server

0

Found 679 CPUs.

Popularity

Processor

Performance

Ryzen 5 5600X

Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


$148.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Apr 20th, 2022


Performance Rating


$289.06 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5800X

Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


$208.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-13900K

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$568. 99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 5600G

Apr 13th, 2021


Performance Rating


$121.57 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-12700K

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$267.27 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 9 5900X

Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


$306.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5700G

Apr 13th, 2021


Performance Rating


$167.91 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Jan 4th, 2023


Performance Rating


$439 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5700X

Apr 4th, 2022


Performance Rating


$189.98 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 5500

Apr 4th, 2022


Performance Rating


$89 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 5600

Apr 20th, 2022


Performance Rating


$129.21 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 7700X

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$311. 24 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-13700K

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$407.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 9 7900X

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$411.68 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 3600

Jul 7th, 2019


Performance Rating


$89 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-12900K

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$359.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-13600K

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$309.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-12600K

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$215 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-13900KF

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$536.12 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 7600X

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$240.25 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i3-12100F

Jan 11th, 2022


Performance Rating


$89. 98 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 7600

Jan 14th, 2023


Performance Rating


$219.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-12700KF

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$273.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-13600KF

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$291.99 on Amazon

In Stock


  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • Next

Intel Pentium N3540 vs Intel Core i3-1000NG4 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences








Intel Pentium N3540 vs Intel Core i3-1000NG4

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium N3540 on one side and the Intel Core i3-1000NG4 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the entry-level laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,7GHz. The second is used on the ultrabook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

Intel Pentium N3540

Intel Core i3-1000NG4
Market (main)

Entry-level laptop

Ultrabook
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Silvermont

Sunny Cove
Core name

Bay Trail-M

Ice Lake-Y
Family

Pentium 3000

Core i3-1000
Part number(s), S-Spec

FH8065301919700,

SR1YW

i3-1000NG4


Release date

Q3 2014

Q2 2020
Lithography

22 nm

10 nm+
Cores

4

2
Threads

4

4
Base frequency

2,16 GHz

1,1 GHz
Turbo frequency

2,66 GHz

3,2 GHz
High performance cores

4 Cores 4 Threads @ 2,16 / 2,66 GHz

2 Cores 4 Threads @ 1,1 / 3,2 GHz


Cache memory

2 MB

4 MB
Max memory capacity

8 GB

32 GB
Memory types

DDR3L 1333

LPDDR4-3733


Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

21,32 GB/s

58,3 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

4

16
TDP

8 W

9 W
GPU integrated graphics

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4
GPU execution units

4

48
GPU shading units

32

384
GPU base clock

313 MHz

300 MHz
GPU boost clock

896 MHz

900 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

42,69 GFLOPS

806,4 GFLOPS
Socket

BGA1170

BGA1526
Maximum temperature

100°C

100°C
AI accelerator

Gaussian & Neural Accelerator,

Deep Learning Boost


Crypto engine

Secure Key

AES New Instructions,

Secure Key


Security

Execute Disable Bit

Software Guard Extensions,

OS Guard,

Trusted Execution Technology,

Execute Disable Bit,

Boot Guard


Max display resolution

4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI),

5120 x 3200@60Hz (DP),

5120 x 3200@60Hz (eDP)


Cinebench R15 single thread

42

143
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

155

304
PassMark single thread

702

1. 977
PassMark CPU Mark

1.226

4.455
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core

1.178

4.367
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

3.153

6.833
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core

228

958
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

748

1.792
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

25,4 GFLOPS

155,3 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

420 pts / W

759 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Pentium N3540 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-1000NG4 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Pentium N3540 is lower. The Intel Core i3-1000NG4 was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i3-1000NG4

143

304
Intel Pentium N3540

42

155

In single core, the difference is 240%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 96%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i3-1000NG4

1.977

4.455
Intel Pentium N3540

702

1.226

In single core, the difference is 182%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 263%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i3-1000NG4

4.367

6.833
Intel Pentium N3540

1.178

3.153

In single core, the difference is 271%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 117%.

On Android:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i3-1000NG4

3. 915

5.953
Intel Pentium N3540

1.309

3.534

In single core, the difference is 199%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 68%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i3-1000NG4

958

1. 792
Intel Pentium N3540

228

748

In single core, the difference is 320%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 140%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Pentium N3540 AMD equivalentIntel Core i3-1000NG4 AMD equivalent

Comparison Intel Core i3-2377M vs Intel Pentium N3540 which is better?

Main / Processor / Intel Core i3-2377M vs Intel Pentium N3540

Intel Core i3-2377M

12%

DeviceList Score

vs

Intel Pentium N3 540

16%

DeviceList score

We compared specifications of Intel Core i3-2377M and Intel Pentium N3540 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023.

Benefits Intel Core i3-2377M

Release price

$250

-1$ (-0.40000000000001%) better than

vs

251 $

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

1850

486 (35.6%) better than

vs

1364

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

956

914 (2176.2%) better than

vs

42

Permissible memory size

16 GB

8 GB (100%) better than

vs

8 GB

Benefits of Intel Pentium N3540

Comparison winner

Core

4

2 (100%) better than

vs

2

Maximum frequency

2.66 GHz

At 1. 16 GHz (77.3%) better than

vs

1.5 GHz

Process

22 nm

-10 nm (-31.2%) better than

vs

32 nm

Value for money

61.2%

9.8% (19.1%) better than

vs

51.4%

Power Demand (TDP)

7.5 W

-9.5 W (-55.9%) better than

vs

17W

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

4752

504 (11.9%) better than

vs

4248

General information

Type

For laptops For laptops

Architecture code name

Sandy Bridge Baytrail-M

Cores

A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.

2 4

2 (100%) better than

Threads

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

4 4

Process

32 nm 22 nm

-10 nm (-31.2%) better than

Chip size

149 mm2 no data

Number of transistors

624 million no data

Maximum frequency

Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.

1.5GHz 2. 66 GHz

At 1.16 GHz (77.3%) better than

Support 64 bit

Max. number of processors in configuration

1 1

Socket

FCBGA1023 FCBGA1170

AMD-V

Series

Intel Core i3 Intel Pentium

Release price

$250

-1 $ (-0.40000000000001%) better than

251 $

Value for money

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

51.4% 61.2%

9.8% (19. 1%) better than

Maximum core temperature

100 °C 100 °C

vPro

TXT

Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

PCI Express revision

2.0 2.0

Number of PCI-Express lanes

16 4

Demand Based Switching

no data

Secure Key

Identity Protection

+ no data

Flex Memory Access

+ no data

Quick Sync

+ +

eDP

+ no data

HDMI

+ no data

FMA

+ no data

My WiFi

+ no data

Total number of SATA ports

n/a 2

Number of USB ports

n/a 5

FDI

+ no data

Anti-Theft

+

Fast Memory Access

+ no data

CRT

+ no data

Smart Connect

n/a +

Level 1 Cache

The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.

64K (per core) 224 Kb

L2 cache

256K (per core) 2 Mb

Level 3 cache

3 MB (total) no data

Power Demand (TDP)

Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

17W 7.5 W

-9.5 W (-55.9%) better than

EDB

+ +

InTru 3D

+

DisplayPort

+ no data

USB revision

no data 3. 0 and 2.0

SDVO

+ no data
Benchmarks

Passmark

n/a 1140

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

1850

486 (35.6%) better than

1364

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

4248 4752

504 (11.9%) better than

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

956

914 (2176.2%) better than

42

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

n/a 157

WinRAR 4.0

n/a 1210

x264 encoding pass 1

n/a 54

x264 encoding pass 2

n/a 11

3DMark06 CPU

1808 no data

Geekbench 2

n/a 3490

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

n/a 988

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

n/a 3254
Technologies and Supplementary Instructions

Advanced Instructions

no data

Turbo Boost

Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to a minimum frequency to save power when the processor is idle.

Thermal Monitoring

Hyper-Threading

Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.

AVX

The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations
applications.

RAM parameters

RAM types

DDR3L-1333

Allowable memory

The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.

16 GB

8 GB (100%) better than

8 GB

Number of memory channels

2 2
Virtualization technologies

EPT

VT-d

Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

Integrated graphics

Maximum GPU clock

1.00 GHz 896 MHz

Maximum number of monitors

2 2

Clear Video HD

Video core

The presence of a video core allows you to use a computer without using a video card.

+ Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series

DirectX

n/a 11.2

Intel Core i3-3120M or Intel Pentium N3530

  • Home
  • >
  • Processors
  • >
  • Compare
  • >
  • Intel Core i3-3120M vs Intel Pentium N3530

Family 49 Compare

Family

  • Pentium N3510
    Compare
  • Pentium N3520
    Compare
  • Pentium N3540
    Compare
  • Pentium N4200
    Compare

Game speed

Core i3-3120M

36. 7 (+43%)

Pentium N3530

25.7

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Office speed

Core i3-3120M

41.4 (+53%)

Pentium N3530

27.1

Performance in daily activities such as browsers and office applications.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Core i3-3120M

20 (+46%)

Pentium N3530

13.7

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Price

The data is obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Core i3-3120M

36.4 (+73%)

Pentium N3530

21.1

Demanding games and tasks

Core i3-3120M

12.3 (+81%)

Pentium N3530

6.8

Extreme

Core i3-3120M

2. 5 (+79%)

Pentium N3530

1.4

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is indicated in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Passmark

Intel Core i3-3120M

1682 (+41%)

Intel Pentium N3530

1192

Features

Main

Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. G2 BGA 1170
Manufacturer Company Intel Intel
Code name of the Microarchitecture family. Ivy Bridge Bay Trail

Performance

Cores The total number of physical cores. 2 4
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 4
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can try disabling the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in case of corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 2.5 GHz 2.16 GHz
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 35 W 7. 5 W

Cache and RAM

Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 32 GB 8 GB
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3
Dual-channel
DDR3L 1333
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel HD 4000 Intel® HD Graphics
GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation. 650 MHz 313MHz
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. 1100MHz 896MHz
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data No data
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 2

PCI

Details

Model Official name. i3-3120M N3530
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Ivy Bridge Bay Trail
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied. 22 nm 22 nm
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i3-3120M Processor (3M Cache, 2.

2024 © All rights reserved