Intel Core i5-3470 vs Intel Core i5-2400 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-3470 vs Intel Core i5-2400
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-3470 on one side and the Intel Core i5-2400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-3470 | Intel Core i5-2400 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Ivy Bridge | Sandy Bridge | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-3000 | Core i5-2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80637I53470, |
BX80623I52400, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2012 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 |
1.160.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 3,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 6 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3 1333/1600 |
DDR3 1066/1333 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 25,6 GB/s | 21 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 77 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 6 | 6 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 48 | 48 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 650 MHz | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 110,4 GFLOPS | 110,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 67. 4°C |
72.6°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 348 | 308 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.335 | 1.212 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 124 | 119 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 440 | 421 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 687 | 620 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.560 | 2.351 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.925 | 1.567 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 4. 627 |
3.811 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.482 | 3.247 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
9.925 | 9.282 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
149,5 GFLOPS | 139,74 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
129 pts / W | 98 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-3470 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Core i5-3470 is lower. The Intel Core i5-3470 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
348 1.  335 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
308 1.212 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
124 440 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
119 421 |
In single core, the difference is 4%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
687 2.560 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
620 2.351 |
In single core, the difference is 11%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 9%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
1.925 4.627 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
1.567 3. /i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_08fbf48bc0524877943fe86e43087e7a/internal_photos/bs/2020/7/l/o2BSBJS8CcORS4xY8eGw/processador-intel-core-i5-3470-32ghz-lga-1155-360ghz-turbo-d-nq-np-719026-mlb31145382724-062019-f.jpg) 811 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
3.482 9.925 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.247 9.282 |
In single core, the difference is 7%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.425 9.109 |
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
3.252 6.720 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
2.961 8.591 |
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
1.712 3.659 |
In single core, the difference is 73%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 135%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-3470 |
3.566 10.256 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.040 8.635 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-3470 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-2400 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-3470SIntel Core i5-3470T
Intel Core i5-2400S
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1060 6GB Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1060 6GB with
Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz
Just Cause 4
GTX 1060 6GB with
Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz
i5-3470
i5-2400
Multi-Thread Performance
6690 Pts
5953 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1914 Pts
1747 Pts
Just Cause 4
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1060 6GB — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i5-3470
i5-2400
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
45.
|
| 1080p |
41.4 FPS
|
| 1440p |
33.4 FPS
|
| 1440p |
30.6 FPS
|
| 2160p |
17.4 FPS
|
| 2160p |
15.9 FPS
|
| w1440p |
27.1 FPS
|
| w1440p |
24.9 FPS
|
2 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
80.2 FPS
|
| 1080p |
74.
|
| 1440p |
61.8 FPS
|
| 1440p |
57.3 FPS
|
| 2160p |
35.0 FPS
|
| 2160p |
32.4 FPS
|
| w1440p |
51.5 FPS
|
| w1440p |
47.9 FPS
|
4 FPSMedium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
115.2 FPS
|
| 1080p |
107.3 FPS
|
| 1440p |
90.
|
| 1440p |
83.9 FPS
|
| 2160p |
52.6 FPS
|
| 2160p |
48.8 FPS
|
| w1440p |
76.0 FPS
|
| w1440p |
70.9 FPS
|
2 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
185.2 FPS
|
| 1080p |
173.2 FPS
|
| 1440p |
146.9 FPS
|
| 1440p |
137.
|
| 2160p |
87.9 FPS
|
| 2160p |
81.7 FPS
|
| w1440p |
124.9 FPS
|
| w1440p |
116.9 FPS
|
3 FPSi5-3470
i5-2400
Compare i5-3470 vs i5-2400 specifications
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 Architecture
| i5-3470 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 Cache
| i5-3470 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 Cores
| i5-3470 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 Features
| i5-3470 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 Notes
| i5-3470 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 Performance
| i5-3470 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i5-3470 vs i5-2400 Physical
| i5-3470 | i5-2400 |
|---|
Share Your Comments 89
Compare i5-3470 vs i5-2400 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Civilization: Beyond Earth
2014
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
Far Cry 4
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Thief
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Bioshock Infinite
2013
Company of Heroes 2
2013
Crysis 3
2013
GRID 2
2013
Metro: Last Light
2013
Total War: Rome 2
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Crysis: Warhead
2008
Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?
Smartphone-graphic wire headphones
33 ballla
Intel Core i5-2400
42 Ballla
Intel Core i5-3470
Winner when comparing
VS
66 facts compared i5-3470
Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i5-3470?
- 5.
2°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
72.6°C vs 67.4°C - GPU frequency 200MHz higher?
850MHz vs 650MHz
- 267MHz higher RAM speed?
1600MHz vs 1333MHz - Semiconductor size 10nm smaller?
22nm vs 32nm - 0.2GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.6GHz vs 3.4GHz - 18W below TDP?
77W vs 95W - 13.88% higher PassMark score?
6606 vs 5801 - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - 4.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/s vs 21GB/s - 11.32% higher PassMark result (single)?
1908 vs 1714
What are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core I5-2400
VS 9000.
3770
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core I3-3220
Intel Core I5-3470
VS VS VS
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core I50002 Intel Core
Intel Core Core
Intel Core Core
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel
Intel
Intel Core
vs
Intel Core i3-7100
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i5-2500k
Intel Core i5-2400 9000) VS
Intel Core 10100
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core I5-3470
VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS -3470S
Price comparison
Reviews of users
General rating
Intel Core i5-2400
3 Reviews of users
Intel Core i5-2400
5.
3 /10
3 reviews of users
Intel Core I5000 9000 3000 3 users
Intel Core i5-3470
8.3 /10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
6.7 / 1002230002 3 votes
/10
3 Votes
Games
2.0 /10
3 Votes
8.0 /10
Votes
9000
3 Votes
8.3 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
4.7 /10
3 Votes
/10
9000 3 Votes
Energy Energy Activity
003
5.0 /10
3 Votes
/10
3 Votes
Code
4 x 3.1GHZ
4 X 3.2GHZ
The central processor speed shows how many cycles show how many cycles show how many cycles show processing per second can be performed by the processor, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.4GHz
3.6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i5-2400
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
850MHz
650MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
1100MHz
1100MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Execution Units
A Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
version of DirectX
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
version of OpenCL
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric location of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(Intel Core i5-3470)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1333MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Core i5-2400
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
✖Intel Core i5-2400
✖Intel Core i5-3470
, Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-2400
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-2400
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✖Intel Core i5-2400
✔Intel Core i5-3470
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-2400
✔Intel Core i5-3470
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-2400
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM) technology .
interface width
Unknown.