Core i7-8700K vs A10-6790K — How Many FPS Germany
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms A10-6790K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1438 days newer than A10-6790K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 36% better in Grand Theft Auto V than A10-6790K — 270 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than AMD A10-6790K — 95 vs 100 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD A10-6790K — 12 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€335
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-8700K Prozessor (12 MB Cache, bis zu, 6 core, 3. 70 GHz)
Buy for €335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
A10-6790K
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2013
FPS
198
64%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
A10-6790K
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2013
270
FPS
198
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
1079
FPS
808
FPS
League of Legends
1438
FPS
1086
FPS
Minecraft
471
FPS
347
FPS
VALORANT
663
FPS
489
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1240
100%
Multi-Core
6477
100%
A10-6790K
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2013
Single-Core
522
-38%
Multi-Core
1399
-263%
|
Intel Core i7-8700K |
vs |
AMD A10-6790K |
|---|---|---|
|
Oct 5th, 2017 |
Release Date | Oct 28th, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | A10 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Richland |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket FM2 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
|
6 |
Cores | 4 |
|
12 |
Threads | 4 |
3. 7 GHz |
Base Clock Speed |
4.0 GHz |
|
4.7 GHz |
Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
|
95 W |
TDP | 100 W |
|
14 nm |
Process Size | 32 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier |
40.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 8670D |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
AMD A10-6790K vs Intel Core i5-3470
Summary
-
AMD A10-6790K
100%
-
Intel Core i5-3470
148%
Relative performance
-
AMD A10-6790K
100%
-
Intel Core i5-3470
140%
Relative performance
-
AMD A10-6790K
100%
-
Intel Core i5-3470
156%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD A10-6790K |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-3470 |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 40% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 56% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 48% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-3470
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-3470
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD A10-6790K | Intel Core i5-3470 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 |
||||
| AVX | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
Architecture
| AMD A10-6790K | Intel Core i5-3470 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Piledriver | vs | Intel_IvyBridge | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Richland | vs | Ivy Bridge | |
| Release Date | Oct 2013 | vs | Jun 2012 |
Cores
| AMD A10-6790K | Intel Core i5-3470 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 4 | vs | 4 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 8670D | vs | Intel HD 2500 |
Cache
| AMD A10-6790K | Intel Core i5-3470 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 6144 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD A10-6790K | Intel Core i5-3470 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FM2 | vs | Intel Socket 1155 | |
| Max Case Temp | 74°C | vs | 67°C | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | FC-LGA12C | |
| Die Size | 246mm² | vs | 132mm² | |
| Process | 32 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| AMD A10-6790K | Intel Core i5-3470 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 4000 MHz | vs | 3200 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4300 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | 1. 475 V |
vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 100 W | vs | 77 W |
-
AMD A10-6790K
2623 points
-
Intel Core i5-3470
3708 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-6790K
8003 points
-
Intel Core i5-3470
13184 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-6790K
5866
-
Intel Core i5-3470
9192
points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-6790K
2067
-
Intel Core i5-3470
2894
points — higher is better
Intel Core i7-4702HQ or AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.RI)
- Home
- >
- Processors
- >
- Comparison
- >
- Intel Core i7-4702HQ VS A10-6790k APU (2013 d.
ri)
Family
- Core i7-4770HQ
Compare - Core i7-4710HQ
Compare - Core i7-4720HQ
Core Core I7-4700HQ 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 Core 9000 9000 Core nine0056The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Office speed
Core i7-4702HQ
50.8 (+0%)
A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
50.7
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CAD programs ignore multi-threaded performance. nine0056
Speed in heavy applications
Core i7-4702HQ
29 (+17%)
A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
24.8 maximum
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. nine0056
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Core i7-4702HQ
45.5 (+12%)
A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
40.5
nine0111
Demanding games and tasks
Core i7-4702HQ
25.8 (+42%)
A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
18.2
Extreme
Core i7-4702HQ
6.
7 (+86%) nine0055 A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
3.6
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS. nine0056
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads. nine0056
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Features
Main
Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. nine0110 BGA 1364 Manufacturer Firm Intel AMD Performance
Cores The total number of physical cores. 
4 2 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. nine0110 8 4 Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can try to disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). nine0110 SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS you can try to disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. 
It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. nine0110
2.2 GHz 4.4 GHz Cache and RAM
Video core
PCI
Detailed information
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 42%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 86%. nine0004
- The number of physical cores is 2 more.
- The number of threads is 4 more.
Comparison AMD A10-6790K vs Intel Core i7-2600 which is better?
Home / processor / AMD A10-6790K VS Intel Core i7-2600
AMD A10-6790K
4%
Devicelist
VS
Intel Core I7-2600
7%
7%0056
We have compared the specifications of AMD A10-6790K and Intel Core i7-2600 and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you.
Find out which one to choose in 2023.
Advantage AMD A10-6790K
|
Base frequency |
|
4 GHz 0.6 GHz (17.6%) better than vs 3.4 GHz |
| nine0055 Maximum frequency |
|
4.3 GHz At 0.5 GHz (13.2%) better than vs 3.8 GHz |
|
Value for money |
|
89.6% 51.9% (137.7%) better than vs 37.7% |
Benefits of Intel Core i7-2600
Comparison winner
|
Threads |
|
8 4 (100%) better than vs 4 |
|
64 bit support |
|
vs |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
73°C -1 °C (-1. vs 74 °C |
|
Power Demand (TDP) |
|
95 W -5 W (-5%) better than vs 100 W |
|
Passmark |
|
5375 2234 (71.1%) better than vs 3141 |
|
AVX |
|
vs |
4%) better than | General | |
|
Type |
|
| Desktop | Desktop |
|
Architecture code name |
|
| Richland | Sandy Bridge |
|
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 4 | 8
4 (100%) better than |
|
Base frequency |
|
| 4 GHz nine0055 Better at 0.6 GHz (17.6%) than |
3.4 GHz |
|
Process |
|
| 32 nm | 32 nm |
|
Chip size |
|
| 246 mm2 | 216 mm2 |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 1 million | |
|
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
4. 3GHz
At 0.5 GHz (13.2%) better than |
3.8 GHz |
|
Support 64 bit |
|
|
Max. number of processors per configuration |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| FM2 | LGA1155 |
|
AMD-V |
|
|
Release price |
|
| n/a | 247 $ |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| 89.6%
51.9% (137.7%) better than |
37.7% |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| 74 °C | 73°C
-1 °C (-1. |
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. nine0056 |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| 2.0 | 2.0 |
|
Number of PCI-Express lanes |
|
| n/a | 16 |
|
Identity Protection |
|
| n/a | |
|
Flex Memory Access |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Quick Sync |
|
| n/a | + |
|
HDMI |
|
| + | n/a |
|
FMA |
|
| FMA4 | n/a |
|
PowerNow |
|
| + | n/a |
|
PowerGating |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VirusProtect |
|
| + | n/a |
|
IOMMU 2. |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 384 | n/a |
|
Enduro |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Switchable graphics |
|
| + | n/a |
|
UVD |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VCE |
|
| + | n/a |
|
FDI |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Fast Memory Access |
|
| n/a | |
|
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. |
|
| 192 Kb | 64 KB (per core) |
|
Level 2 cache |
|
| 4096 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
|
Level 3 cache |
|
| n/a | 8192 Kb (total) |
|
Maximum case temperature (TCase) |
|
| 74 °C | n/a |
|
Free multiplier |
|
|
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 100W | 95 W
-5 W (-5%) better than |
|
EDB |
|
| n/a | + |
|
InTru 3D |
|
| n/a | + |
|
DisplayPort |
|
| + | |
4%) better than 
0 
nine0056 | 5375
2234 (71.1%) better than |
||
|
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
||
| n/a | 5020 | |
| Technology and additional instructions | |
|
Extended instructions |
|
| n/a | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| n/a | 2.0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced Speed Step (EIST) A technology from Intel that allows you to lower the processor frequency to a minimum value to save power consumption during processor idle periods. |
|
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
|
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. nine0056 |
|
|
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process. |
|
| + | + |
|
AVX The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations |
|
| RAM options | |
|
RAM types |
|
| DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 |
|
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| n/a | 32 GB |
|
Number of memory channels |
|
| 2 | 2 |
| Virtualization technologies | ||
|
EPT |
||
|
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
||
| Integrated graphics | |
|
Maximum GPU clock |
|
| no data | 1.35 GHz |
|
Maximum number of monitors |
|
| n/a | 2 |
|
Clear Video HD |
|
|
Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card. | |
