Dual Intel Xeon E5450 vs Intel Core i5-11500
|
|
|
|
|
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 vs Intel Core i5-11500
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Dual Intel Xeon E5450 on one side and the Intel Core i5-11500 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Dual Intel Xeon E5450 | Intel Core i5-11500 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Server | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Penryn | Rocket Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Harpertown | Rocket Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Xeon E5400 | Core i5-11000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80574E5450A, BX80574E5450P, AT80574KJ080N, EU80574KJ080N, Q5YQ, QFUF, SLANQ, SLBBM |
BX8070811500, BXC8070811500, CM8070804496809, QWJX, SRKNY |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2007 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm+++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 640.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,0 GHz | 2,7 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 4,6 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 2,66 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 24 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR2 SDRAM, DDR3 SDRAM | DDR4-3200 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 6 | 2 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 56 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 160 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 700W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 32 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 256 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 460,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA771 | LGA1200 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 771 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 67°C | 100°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator | — | Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost |
||||||
| Crypto engine | — | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
| Security | Execute Disable Bit | OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 278 | 594 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2. 280 |
4.341 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 102 | 232 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 676 | 1.584 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 236 | 536 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.412 | 4.015 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.266 | 3.038 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 4.674 | 17.531 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit | Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.963 | 6.505 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit | Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
10. 256 |
26.149 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 single core |
453 | 1.629 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
2.362 | 7.084 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
126,9 GFLOPS | 460,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
64 pts / W | 402 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i5-11500 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-11500 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-11500 is less. The Intel Core i5-11500 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
594 4.  341 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
278 2.280 |
In single core, the difference is 114%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 90%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
232 1.584 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
102 676 |
In single core, the difference is 127%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 134%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
536 4.015 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
236 1.412 |
In single core, the difference is 127%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 184%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
3.038 17.531 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
1.266 4.674 |
In single core, the difference is 140%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 275%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
6.505 26.149 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
1.824 8.904 |
In single core, the difference is 257%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 194%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
1.534 6.970 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
428 2.  456 |
In single core, the difference is 258%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 184%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
1.629 7.084 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
453 2.362 |
In single core, the difference is 260%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 200%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 |
1.279 5.840 |
| Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
437 1.977 |
In single core, the difference is 193%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 195%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-11500 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Xeon E5450
Intel Core i5-11500BIntel Core i5-11500HIntel Core i5-11500HEIntel Core i5-11500T
Dell Latitude E5450 14″ vs Latitude E5550 15″
- Laptop vs Laptop
- Finder
- Budget Laptops
- Dell Latitude E5450 14″ (Latitude) vs Latitude E5550 15″ (NB-DL-LATITUDEE5550-NB-i5-2.
3-8-512SSD)
$229.00
$228.00
Buy on Amazon.com
Buy on Amazon.com
Comparison summary
For performance Dell Latitude E5450 14″ has a better performing processor.
Dell Latitude E5550 15″ has a bigger screen. For portability E5450 14″ is lighter and smaller in size.
E5550 15″ has more SSD storage.
Dell Latitude E5450 14″ (Latitude)
Dell Latitude E5550 15″ (NB-DL-LATITUDEE5550-NB-i5-2.3-8-512SSD)
Customer Reviews
Compare vs other laptops
Customer Reviews
Compare vs other laptops
Compare specifications
| Dell Latitude E5450 14″ (Latitude) | Dell Latitude E5550 15″ (NB-DL-LATITUDEE5550-NB-i5-2.3-8-512SSD) |
|---|---|
| Processor (CPU)?Central Processing Unit is the heart of a laptop and is responsible for executing programs. Read more |
|
| Intel Core i7-5600U | Intel Core i5-5300U |
Memory (RAM)?Memory increases the general speed and multiprocessing capabilities of a laptop. Read more |
|
| 8gb | 8gb |
| Screen size | |
| 14″ | 15.6″ |
| Screen resolution | |
| HD (1366 x 768 pixels) | — |
| Weight | |
| 3.99 lbs (1.81 kg) | 4.71 lbs (2.14 kg) |
| Size (length x width x height) | |
| 13.2 x 9.1 x 0.9 inches | 14.84 x 8.87 x 0.92 inches |
| (33.53 x 23.11 x 2.29 cm) | (37.69 x 22.53 x 2.34 cm) |
| Operating system (OS) | |
| Windows 10 Pro | Windows 10 Pro |
| Hard drives | |
| 250gb SSD | 500gb SSD |
| Release date | |
| August 8, 2019 | March 3, 2020 |
| Amazon.com List Price | |
| $229.00 | $228.00 |
| Amazon.com Lowest New Price | |
| $229.00 | $228.
|