The AMD FirePro W9000 & W8000 Review: Part 1
by Ryan Smithon August 14, 2012 4:00 AM EST
- Posted in
- GPUs
- AMD
- FirePro
- Tahiti
35 Comments
|
35 Comments
AMD’s FirePro W SeriesIntroducing the FirePro W SeriesSetting the Scene: The Professional Graphics MarketAMD’s Plan of AttackGraphics Core Next: Compute for ProfessionalsThe Rest of the FirePro W Series Feature SetR.I.P: FireStream (2006 — 2012)More to Come, So Stay Tuned
Despite the wide range of the GPU coverage we do here at AnandTech, from reading our articles you would be hard pressed to notice that AMD and NVIDIA have product lines beyond their consumer Radeon and GeForce brands. Consumer video cards compose the bulk of all video cards shipped, the bulk of revenue booked, and since they’re targeted at a very wide audience, the bulk of all marketing attention. Consequently consumer cards also take up the bulk of the press’s attention, especially since new GPUs are almost always launched in a consumer video card first.
The truth of course is that there’s a great deal more to the GPU marketplace than consumer video cards; abutting the consumer market is the smaller, specialized, but equally important professional market that makes up the rest of the desktop GPU marketplace. Where consumers need gaming performance and video playback, professionals need compute performance, specialized rendering performance, and above all a level of product reliability and support beyond what consumers need. They need the same basic product as consumers – a high performance, feature-packed GPU – but they need to use it in entirely different ways.
As a result of these different needs the GPU marketplace is traditionally split up into three segments: consumer, professional graphics, and compute. Among these segments consumer products typically launch first, with professional and compute products following 6 to 12 months later based on further driver development and qualification needs. The end result is an interesting product cascade that sees the true, unrestricted performance of a GPU only finally unveiled several months after it launches.
This leads us to today’s product review: AMD’s FirePro W9000 video card. Having launched their Graphics Core Next architecture and the first GPUs based on it at the beginning of the year, AMD has been busy tuning and validating GCN for the professional graphics and compute markets, and that process has finally reached its end. This month AMD is launching a complete family of professional video cards, the FirePro W series, led by the flagship W9000.
AMD FirePro W Series Specification Comparison | ||||||
AMD FirePro W9000 | AMD FirePro W8000 | AMD FirePro W7000 | AMD FirePro W5000 | |||
Stream Processors | 2048 | 1792 | 1280 | 768 | ||
Texture Units | 128 | 112 | 80 | 48 | ||
ROPs | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | ||
Core Clock | 975MHz | 900MHz | 950MHz | 825MHz | ||
Memory Clock | 5. 5GHz GDDR5 | 5.5GHz GDDR5 | 4.8GHz GDDR5 | 3.2GHz GDDR5 | ||
Memory Bus Width | 384-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | ||
VRAM | 6GB | 4GB | 4GB | 2GB | ||
Double Precision | 1/4 | 1/4 | 1/16 | 1/16 | ||
Transistor Count | 4. 31B | 4.31B | 2.8B | 2.8B | ||
TDP | 274W | 189W | <150W | <75W | ||
Manufacturing Process | TSMC 28nm | TSMC 28nm | TSMC 28nm | TSMC 28nm | ||
Architecture | GCN | GCN | GCN | GCN | ||
Warranty | 3-Year | 3-Year | 3-Year | 3-Year | ||
Launch Price | $3999 | $1599 | $899 | $599 |
As always, the latest rendition of the FirePro family will be taking their place as AMD’s professional graphics card lineup. Having a dedicated professional graphics card lineup allows AMD to offer features and functionality – primarily rigorous application certification against a driver set tuned for high reliability – that while not necessary for consumer cards are critical for professional users; and of course to charge those users accordingly. FirePro also is distinct for being AMD’s only in-house video card offering, with AMD directly producing, selling, and supporting the products as opposed to farming that work out to third party partner companies (as is the case with Radeon cards).
Taking a quick look at the specifications, if you’re familiar at all with AMD’s Radeon HD 7000 series lineup, then the FirePro W series lineup should look very familiar. As with the FirePro V series and past iterations of the FirePro, the latest rendition of the FirePro family is effectively comprised of professional certified versions of existing Radeon HD 7000 series video cards, which means the hardware is nearly identical to AMD’s consumer products.
The big new with this week’s launch of course isn’t just that AMD will be replacing the 40nm FirePro V series with the 28nm FirePro W series, but that they’re doing so with Graphics Core Next, their modern compute-oriented GPU architecture. With FirePro pulling double-duty as both AMD’s professional graphics card and their compute card, this makes GCN all the more important as it brings with it potentially massive compute performance improvements that significantly shore up the V series’ weakness in compute. We’ve often said that the full power of GCN hasn’t been tapped by the consumer-oriented Radeon series, so now with FirePro we’ll finally get to see everything GCN can do.
We’ll dive into greater detail later about the individual products and their specifications, but for now we’ll offer a quick overview of the FirePro W series. Altogether the W series is to initially be composed of 4 cards, the W9000, W8000, W7000, and W5000. The former two are based around AMD’s high-end Tahiti GPU while the latter two are based around their mid-tier Pitcairn GPU, which creates a clear distinction between the two groups. Whereas Tahiti was built for both strong graphics and strong compute performance, Pitcairn is more tuned for graphics, and as FirePro products that distinction has not changed.
As a result high performance computing – particularly double precision – is going to be the domain of W8000 and W9000, along with AMD’s best graphical performance. W7000 and W5000 on the other hand still offer respectable single precision compute performance but lack the double precision performance of the larger cards, making them better suited for pure graphical workloads than for compute or compute mixed with graphics.
Moving on, much like AMD’s consumer product launch earlier this year they will enjoy a couple month lead over NVIDIA in getting 28nm cards out into the professional market. So for the time being AMD will have a generational lead over NVIDIA’s competing products, the Fermi based Quadro series. Unlike the consumer space though the hardware upgrade pace in the professional market is much slower, so while this still gives AMD an advantage it won’t be as significant as their launch advantage in the consumer space.
On that note, when it comes to competition, pricing has been a big part of AMD’s strategy. Typically, AMD has undercut NVIDIA on pricing for equivalent professional products in order to cut into NVIDIA’s very large share of the market. Professional graphics margins are high enough that AMD can afford to sacrifice some of their margin for market share.
For the initial launch however this won’t strictly be the case, due to the fact that the Fermi Quadro series is slowly on its way out – to be replaced by the K5000 and future cards. With a SRP of $3999 for the W9000 it’s roughly as expensive as the Quadro 6000 at current prices, and the situation is similar for the $1599 W8000 compared to the Quadro 5000. Eventually NVIDIA will finish refreshing the Quadro series for Kepler, and when they do it would be reasonable to expect that AMD’s pricing will undercut NVIDIA’s new prices; the Quardo 6000 did have a launch MSRP of $4999, after all.
Summer 2012 Workstation Video Card Price Comparison | |||||
AMD | Price | NVIDIA | |||
FirePro W9000 | $3999 | Quadro 6000 | |||
FirePro W8000 | $1599-$1799 | Quadro 5000 | |||
FirePro W7000 | $749-$899 | Quadro 4000 | |||
FirePro W5000 | $599 | ||||
$399 | Quadro 2000 |
Finally, on a quick housekeeping note, as you may have noticed in the title we are splitting up this article into two parts. Part 1 will be focusing on the tech, the specs, and the market, while part 2 will focus on benchmarking and our performance analysis. This is so we can get the first part out at the start of this week, as opposed to holding it our extended benchmarking is complete. So if you’re looking for specific figures and performance numbers, please be sure to check back later this week for the full performance rundown.
Introducing the FirePro W Series
AMD’s FirePro W SeriesIntroducing the FirePro W SeriesSetting the Scene: The Professional Graphics MarketAMD’s Plan of AttackGraphics Core Next: Compute for ProfessionalsThe Rest of the FirePro W Series Feature SetR.I.P: FireStream (2006 — 2012)More to Come, So Stay Tuned
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
FirePro W8000 [in 1 benchmark]
FirePro W8000
Buy
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 900 MHz
- Max video memory 4096 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 5500 MHz
- Maximum resolution 4096×2160
Summary
AMD started FirePro W8000 sales 14 June 2012 at a recommended price of $1,599. This is a GCN 1.0 architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 5.5 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 176 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 279 mm. Two 6-pin power connectors are required, and power consumption is at 225 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
10.43%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX4090
Compare
General info
Some basic facts about FirePro W8000: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
Place in performance ranking | 351 | |
Value for money | 6. 51 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | |
GPU code name | Tahiti | |
Market segment | Workstation | |
Release date | 14 June 2012 (11 years old) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Current price | $215 (0.1x MSRP) | of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
FirePro W8000’s specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of FirePro W8000’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 4,313 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
Texture fill rate | 100. 8 | of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Size and compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of FirePro W8000 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Width | 2-slot | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on FirePro W8000: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Memory bandwidth | 176 GB/s | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on FirePro W8000. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
StereoOutput3D | 1 | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | 1 |
API support
APIs supported by FirePro W8000, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of FirePro W8000. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FirePro W8000
10.43
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
FirePro W8000
4095
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of FirePro W8000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 391 Mh/s |
Gaming performance
Let’s see how good FirePro W8000 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Relative perfomance
Overall FirePro W8000 performance compared to nearest competitors among server video cards.
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
105.47
AMD FirePro W7000
103.74
NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
103.74
AMD FirePro W8000
100
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
96.93
AMD FirePro D500
96.36
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
95.97
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to FirePro W8000 is Quadro K5000, which is slower by 3% and lower by 7 positions in our ranking.
QuadroK5000
Compare
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to FirePro W8000:
NVIDIA Tesla K20m
105.75
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
105.47
NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
103.74
AMD FirePro W8000
100
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
96.93
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
95.97
NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
94.82
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
QuadroK5000
Compare
FirePro
D500
FireProW7000
Compare
QuadroK4200
Compare
Tesla
K20m
Tesla
K40c
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with FirePro W8000 according to our statistics.
Core i5
1035G1
11.8%
A9
9425
5.9%
Core i7
8565U
5.9%
Ryzen Threadripper
PRO 5995WX
5.9%
Core i9
12900K
5.9%
Core i7
8700
5.9%
Athlon Gold
3150U
5.9%
Core i7
1165G7
5.9%
Core i5
1035G4
5.9%
A8
7680
5. 9%
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about FirePro W8000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
performance overview and gaming performance tests
The FirePro W8000 graphics card was released by AMD, release date: 14 June 2012. At the time of release, the graphics card cost $1,599. The video card is designed for workstation computers and is built on the GCN 1.0 architecture, codenamed Tahiti.
Core frequency — 900 MHz. Texturing speed — 100.8 GTexel / s. Number of shader processors — 1792. Floating point performance — 3,226 gflops. Technological process — 28 nm. The number of transistors is 4,313 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 350 Watt.
Memory type: GDDR5. The maximum memory size is 4 GB. Memory bus width — 256 Bit. Memory frequency — 5500 MHz. The memory bandwidth is 176 GB / s.
Benchmarks
PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|||||
PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
Name | Meaning |
---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 4096 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 464 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 82941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection | 64.628 mPixels/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 387.109 mHash/s |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 7400 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 3717 Frames |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex | 3357 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 7400.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 3717.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3357.000 Fps |
Features
Architecture | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Tahiti |
Production date | 14 June 2012 |
Price at first issue date | $1,599 |
Ranking | 365 |
Type | Workstation |
Core frequency | 900MHz |
Floating point performance | 3. 226 gflops |
Technological process | 28nm |
Number of shaders | 1792 |
Texturing speed | 100.8 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt |
Number of transistors | 4,313 million |
Video connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Number of DisplayPort | 4 |
Dual-link DVI support | |
StereoOutput3D | |
Tire | PCIe 3. 0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279mm |
Additional power connectors | 2x 6-pin |
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 |
Maximum memory size | 4GB |
Memory bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit |
Memory frequency | 5500MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose your graphics card
Compare graphics cards
Compare AMD FirePro W8000 with other graphics cards
AMD
FirePro W8000
versus
NVIDIA
Tesla K20m
AMD
FirePro W8000
versus
AMD
FirePro R5000
AMD
FirePro W8000
versus
AMD
Radeon HD 7990
AMD
FirePro W8000
versus
AMD
Radeon R9 370
AMD
FirePro W8000
versus
AMD
Radeon R9 M470X
AMD
FirePro W8000
versus
AMD
Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
FirePro W8000 video card [in 1 benchmark]
FirePro W8000
- PCIe 3. 0 x16 interface
- Core frequency 900 MHz
- Video memory size 4096 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory frequency 5500 MHz
- Maximum resolution 4096×2160
Description
AMD started FirePro W8000 sales on June 14, 2012 with a suggested price of $1,599. This is a desktop video card based on the GCN 1.0 architecture and 28 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at designers. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory at 5.5 GHz, and coupled with a 256-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 176 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a two-slot PCIe 3.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 279 mm. Two 6-pin additional power cables are required for connection, and the power consumption is 225 watts.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
10.43%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX 4090
Compare
General Information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the FirePro W8000, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Performance ranking | 351 | |
Value for money | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012-2020) | |
GPU | Tahiti | |
Type | For workstations | |
Release date | June 14, 2012 (11 years ago) | |
Release price | $1,599 900 15 | |
Price now | $215 (0.1x) | of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) 9001 5 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher the better.
Features
FirePro W8000’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of FirePro W8000’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Number of stream processors | 1792 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
900MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) | |
Number of transistors | 4.313 million | out of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (mobile)) | Technological process | 28nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
TDP | 225 W | out of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
Texturing speed | 100.8 | of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
07 3.226 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on FirePro W8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
Bus | PCIe 3.0 | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||
Thickness | 2 slots | ||
Form factor | full height / full length | ||
Additional power connectors | 2x 6-pin |
RAM
Parameters of the memory installed on the FirePro W8000 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum memory | 4 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width 90 015 | 256bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory frequency | 5500 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Memory bandwidth | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
Video outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the FirePro W8000. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Video connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
StereoOutput3D 9001 5 | 1 | |
Number of DisplayPort connectors | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | 1 |
API support
APIs supported by the FirePro W8000, including their versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | ||
Shader Model | 5.1 | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2. 131 |
Benchmark tests
These are the results of the FirePro W8000 rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FirePro W8000
10.43
Passmark
This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation by running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the latter is done in 4K resolution if possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
FirePro W8000
4095
Mining hashrates
FirePro W8000 performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 391 Mh/s |
FirePro W8000 in games
FPS in popular games on FirePro W8000, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
Relative capacity
Overall performance of the FirePro W8000 compared to its closest competitor in workstation graphics cards.
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
105.47
AMD FirePro W7000
103.74
NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
103.74
AMD FirePro W8000
100
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
96.93
AMD FirePro D500
96.36
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
95.97
Competitor from NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to FirePro W8000 from NVIDIA is Quadro K5000, which is slower by 3% and lower by 7 positions in our rating on average.
Quadro K5000
Compare
Here are some of NVIDIA’s closest competitors to the FirePro W8000:
NVIDIA Tesla K20m
105.75
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
105.47
NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
103. 74
AMD FirePro W8000
100
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
96.93
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
95.97
NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
94.82
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Quadro K5000
Compare
firepro
D500
FirePro W7000
Compare
Tesla
K20m
Tesla
K40c
Recommended Processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most commonly used with the FirePro W8000.
Core i5
1035G1
11.8%
A9
9425
5.9%
Core i7
8565U
5.