AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-4370
UserBenchmark: AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-4370
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80646I34370
FD6300WMHKBOX
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 284,812 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
1,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 3.8 GHz
Worst Bench: 52% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 52%
Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 438th / 1368
Gaming 66% Battle cruiser |
Desktop 75% Battleship |
Workstation 48% Yacht |
283,304 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Base clock 4. 45 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48%
Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 578th / 1368
Gaming 58% Gunboat |
Desktop 61% Destroyer |
Workstation 42% Speed boat |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
66.1 % | Faster effective speed. +14% |
57.9 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
86.2 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +7% |
80. 9 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
101 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +59% |
63.4 Pts | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
177 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +54% |
115 Pts | |||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
268 Pts | Much faster quad-core speed. +37% |
196 Pts | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
272 Pts | Faster octa-core speed. +10% |
247 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
94. 7 Pts | +5% | 90.2 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
113 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed. +56% |
72.3 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
211 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +54% |
137 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
301 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed. +30% |
231 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
301 Pts | +2% | 295 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 56,218,291 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0 % | 0.08 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
78.5 % | 79 % | +1% | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
52 % | 56 % | Slightly more popular. +8% |
|||
Price Price (score) |
$149 | $90 | Much cheaper. +40% |
Age Newest |
97 Months | More recent. +19% |
120 Months | |||
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
54 Watts | Much more energy efficient. +43% |
95 Watts | |||
Cores CPU Processing Cores |
2 cores | 6 cores | Hugely higher core count. +200% |
|||
Threads CPU Processing Threads |
4 threads | 6 threads | Much higher thread count. +50% |
|||
Lithography Manufacturing process |
22 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +31% |
32 nm | |||
Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3.8 GHz | Slightly faster base frequency. +9% |
3.5 GHz | |||
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz | Slightly faster turbo frequency. +8% |
|||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
302 Pts | 306 Pts | +1% | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
273 Pts | Slightly faster 64-core speed. +9% |
251 Pts |
Series CPU Architecture |
Haswell | Piledriver | ||||
Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1150 | AM3+ | ||||
Graphics Integrated Graphics |
HD 4600 | None |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD FX-4350 vs Intel Core i3-4370
UserBenchmark: AMD FX-4350 vs Intel Core i3-4370
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80646I34370
FD4350FRHKBOX
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 13,650 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
1,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 3. 8 GHz
Worst Bench: 52% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 52%
Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 438th / 1368
Gaming 66% Battle cruiser |
Desktop 75% Battleship |
Workstation 48% Yacht |
12,142 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 45% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 45%
Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 582nd / 1368
Gaming 58% Gunboat |
Desktop 63% Destroyer |
Workstation 41% Speed boat |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
66. 1 % | Faster effective speed. +15% |
57.7 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
86.2 Pts | +5% | 82.2 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
101 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +48% |
68.4 Pts | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
177 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +43% |
124 Pts | |||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
268 Pts | Much faster quad-core speed. +38% |
194 Pts | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
272 Pts | Much faster octa-core speed. +38% |
197 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
94.7 Pts | +3% | 92.1 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
113 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed. +44% |
78.6 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
211 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +45% |
146 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
301 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed. +33% |
227 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
301 Pts | Much faster OC octa-core speed. +32% |
228 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 56,218,291 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0 % | 0.01 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
78.5 % | Slightly better value. +10% |
71.4 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
52 % | 52 % | ||||
Price Price (score) |
$149 | $128 | Cheaper. +14% |
Age Newest |
97 Months | More recent. +14% |
113 Months | |||
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
54 Watts | Much more energy efficient. +43% |
95 Watts | |||
Cores CPU Processing Cores |
2 cores | 4 cores | Hugely higher core count. +100% |
|||
Threads CPU Processing Threads |
4 threads | 4 threads | ||||
Lithography Manufacturing process |
22 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +31% |
32 nm | |||
Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz | Faster base frequency. +11% |
|||
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
3.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz | Faster turbo frequency. +13% |
|||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
302 Pts | Much faster OC 64-core speed. +32% |
228 Pts | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
273 Pts | Much faster 64-core speed. +38% |
198 Pts |
Series CPU Architecture |
Haswell | Piledriver | ||||
Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1150 | AM3+ | ||||
Graphics Integrated Graphics |
HD 4600 | None |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Intel Core i3-4370 or AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core
- Come
- >
- Processors
- >
- Intel Core i3-4370 VS AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core
Family
- Core i3-4330
Compare - Core i3-4340
Compare - Core i3-4350
Compare - Core I3-4360
0022 Compare - FX-4130 QUAD-Core
Compare - FX-4300
Compare - FX-4350
Compare
Speed in games
Core i3-4370
57.4 (+8.4%)
9005 900 FX 4170 Quad-Core
52.6
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i3-4370
63.7 (+12.1%)
FX-4170 Quad-Core
56
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i3-4370
30.9 (+9.7%)
FX-4170 Quad-Core
27.9
maximum
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Core i3-4370 61.1 (+20.9%) FX-4170 Quad-Core 48.3 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Core i3-4370 24.9 (+14.5%) FX-4170 Quad-Core 21.3 |
Extreme |
Core i3-4370 4.9 (+14.3%) FX-4170 Quad-Core 4.2 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
Intel Core i3-4370
3682 (+15.2%)
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core
3121
existing features.
Basic
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i3-4370 Processor (4M Cache, 3.80 GHz) | |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Haswell | |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 22 | No data |
Date of Issue The month and year the processor was released. | 10-2017 | 10-2016 |
Model Official name. | i3-4370 | |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 2 | 2 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | No data | 4.15 |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 4 | No data |
Instructions | 64-bit | |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | |
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 54 | No data |
Cooling system specifications | PCG 2013C |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | 350 | No data |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | 1150 | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | No data | |
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 32 | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
RAM bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | No data | No data |
PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Protection
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i3-4370
- On average, gaming performance is 5% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 8%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and 1% better.
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core
- The base frequency is 0.4 GHz higher.
What are the similarities
- Prices for new processors are approximately equal.
- The number of physical cores is equal.
- The number of threads is equal.
Compare Intel Core i3 4370 and AMD FX 4300
Intel Core i3 4370
3.8 GHz | 2 cores
VS
AMD FX 4300
3.8GHz | 4 cores | AM3+
Benchmarks
Overall result
Based on 5 tests:
Intel Core i3 4370 is 61% faster
- Smaller CPU (22nm vs 32nm) allows for more performance with less heat dissipation
- Larger L3 cache per core: 2MB/core vs 1MB/core
- Built-in GPU eliminates the need for an external graphics card
Reasons to choose AMD FX 4300
- More cores (4 vs.