Fx 8320 vs 8350: AMD FX-8320 vs AMD FX-8350: What is the difference?

AMD FX-8320 vs AMD FX-8350: What is the difference?

39points

AMD FX-8320

35points

AMD FX-8350

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-8320

AMD FX-8350

Why is AMD FX-8320 better than AMD FX-8350?

• 38.36% higher PassMark result?
  8199vs5926
• 43.24% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
  9371vs6542
• 53.0 more performance per watt?
  75.0vs22.0
• 1 higher Turbo Core version?
  3vs2

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than AMD FX-8320?

• 14.29% faster CPU speed?
  8 x 4GHzvs8 x 3.5GHz
• 11.4% higher PassMark result (single)?
  1563vs1403

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-8320

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD FX-8320

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD FX-8320

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-8320

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD FX-8320

vs

AMD FX-8320E

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD FX-6300

AMD FX-8320

vs

AMD FX-6300

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD FX-8320

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD FX-8320

vs

Intel Core i5-3330

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD FX-8320

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-8320

0 User reviews

AMD FX-8320

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

AMD FX-8350

5 User reviews

AMD FX-8350

9.8/10

5 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

9.6/10

5 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

9.6/10

5 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

9.2/10

5 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

9.6/10

5 votes

Energy efficiency

No reviews yet

 

8.6/10

5 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 3.5GHz

8 x 4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.2GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

1MB/core

1MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9. L3 core

1MB/core

1MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1866MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

21GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-8320

✖AMD FX-8350

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-8320

✖AMD FX-8350

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8320

✖AMD FX-8350

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD FX-8350 vs. AMD FX-8320

AMD FX-8350

The AMD FX-8350 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2012

AMD FX-8320

The AMD FX-8320 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.75 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W. The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2012

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8320

Compare Detail

4.00 GHz	Frequency	3.50 GHz
8	Cores	8
4.20 GHz	Turbo (1 Core)	4.00 GHz
4.10 GHz	Turbo (All Cores)	3.75 GHz
No	Hyperthreading	No
Yes	Overclocking	Yes
normal	Core Architecture	normal
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
32 nm	Technology	32 nm
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
	DirectX Version
	Max. displays
	Memory	DDR3-1866
2	Memory channels	2
	Max memory
Yes	ECC	Yes
—	L2 Cache	—
8.00 MB	L3 Cache	8.00 MB
	PCIe version
	PCIe lanes
32 nm	Technology	32 nm
AM3+	Socket	AM3+
125 W	TDP	125 W
AMD-V	Virtualization	AMD-V
Q4/2012	Release date	Q4/2012
Show more data		Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.

5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD FX-8350		AMD FX-8320
125 W	Max TDP	125 W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per year	NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8320

AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8320

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-8350 on one side and the AMD FX-8320 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor		AMD FX-8350				AMD FX-8320
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Piledriver				Piledriver
Core name		Vishera				Vishera
Family		FX-8000				FX-8000
Part number(s), S-Spec		FD8350FRW8KHK, FD8350FRHKBOX, FX-8350 Black Edition				FD8320FRW8KHK, FD8320FRHKBOX
Release date		Q4 2012				Q4 2012
Lithography		32 nm SOI				32 nm SOI
Transistors		1. 200.000.000				1.200.000.000
Cores		8				8
Threads		8				8
Base frequency		4,0 GHz				3,5 GHz
Turbo frequency		4,2 GHz				4,0 GHz
Cache memory		8 MB				8 MB
Max memory capacity		32 GB				32 GB
Memory types		DDR3-1866				DDR3-1866
Max # of memory channels		2				2
Max memory bandwidth		29,9 GB/s				29,9 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes		16				16
TDP		125 W				125 W
Suggested PSU		650W ATX Power Supply				650W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		None				None
Socket		AM3+				AM3+
Compatible motherboard		Socket AM3+ Motherboard				Socket AM3+ Motherboard
Maximum temperature		61°C				61. 1°C
Drystone MIPS		97.114 DMIPS				—
CPU-Z single thread		231				243
CPU-Z multi thread		1.597				1.702
Cinebench R15 single thread		100				82
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		669				549
PassMark single thread		1.573				1.454
PassMark CPU Mark		5.944				5.355
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		2.738				2. 621
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		10.978				10.925
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		99,6 GFLOPS				105,2 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		88 pts / W				87 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-8350 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD FX-8320	243 1. 702
AMD FX-8350	231 1.597

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD FX-8350	100 669
AMD FX-8320	82 549

In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 22%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD FX-8350	1.573 5.944
AMD FX-8320	1.454 5.355

In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD FX-8350	2.738 10.978
AMD FX-8320	2.621 10.925

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD FX-8320	2. 849 11.033
AMD FX-8350	2.755 10.794

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD FX-8350	2.688 11.071
AMD FX-8320	2.448 9.539

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD FX-8350 Intel equivalentAMD FX-8320 Intel equivalent

See also:

AMD FX-8320E

AMD FX-8320 vs AMD FX-8350: What is the difference?

Smartphone-graphic wire headphones

39 BALLLA

AMD FX-8320

35 BALLLA

AMD FX-8350

VS

64 AMD FX-8320

AMD FX-8350 9000 9000 AMD FX-835520 Is 8320 better than AMD FX-8350?

• 38.36% higher PassMark score?
  8199 vs 5926
• 43.24% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
  9371 vs 6542
• 53.0 higher performance per watt?
  75.0 vs 22.0
• 1 newer version of Turbo Core?
  3 vs 2

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than AMD FX-8320?

• 14. 29% higher CPU speed?
  8 x 4GHz vs 8 x 3.5GHz
• 11.4% higher PassMark score (single)?
  1563 vs 1403

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-8320

VS

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD FX-8320

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 AMD AM -8350

VS

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD FX-8320

VS

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD Phenom II X4

9000 9000.

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD FX-8320

vs

AMD FX-8320E

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD FX-6300

1600

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD FX-8320

VS

Intel Core i5-3330

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD RYZEN 3 2200G

9000 AMD FX-8320 9000 9000 9000 VS 9000 AM Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Price comparison

users reviews

total0002

0. 0 /10

0 reviews of users

AMD FX-8350

5 reviews of users

AMD FX-8350

/10

5 Reviews Users

Functions

Cost.

reviews are not yet

9.6 /10

5 Votes

Games

reviews yet there are no

/10

5 Votes

performance

reviews yet not

/10

5 Votes

Reliability

reviews yet there are no

9.6 /10

5 Votes

9000

8.6 /10

5 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 3.5GHz

8 x 4GHz

8 x 4GHz0003

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.2GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

Some processors come with unlocked multipliers and are easier to overclock, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

1MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1MB/core

1MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1866MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

21GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3rd DDR memory version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5. max memory

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

6.baud rate bus

5.4GT/s

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory error recovery code

✖AMD FX-8320

✖AMD FX-8350

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9. bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multi-threading

✖AMD FX-8320

✖AMD FX-8350

processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8320

✔AMD FX-8350

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. TrustZone enabled

✖AMD FX-8320

✖AMD FX-8350

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming .

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8320)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

This page is currently only available in English.

AMD FX-8350 or AMD FX-8320

• Main page
• FX-8370
  Compare
• FX-8370E
  Complete

Speed ​​in games

FX-8350

57.8 (+4.5%)

FX-8320

55.2

Productivity in games and similar apparatus and similar apparatus and similar applications and similar applications. according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

FX-8350

58.6 (+4.4%)

FX-8320

56

Performance in daily activities such as browsers and office applications.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

FX-8350

35.1 (+5.7%)

FX-8320

33.1

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

FX-8350 50.2 (+4.8%) FX-8320 47.8

Demanding games and tasks

FX-8350 31.3 (+9.9%) FX-8320 28.2

Extreme

FX-8350 8.4 (+10.7%) FX-8320 7.5

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R20 Single Core

AMD FX-8350

209 (+10%)

AMD FX-8320

188

Cinebench R20 Multi Core

AMD FX-8350

1298 (+16.6%)

AMD FX-8320

1082

Cinebench R15 Multi Core

AMD FX-8350

665 (+8.6%)

AMD FX-8320

Geekbench 3 multi core

AM

11164 (+8.5%)

AMD FX-8320

10211

Cinebench R11.5

AMD FX-8350

6.94 (+8.5%)

AMD FX-8320

6.35

Data data, be skipped existing functions.

Basic

Manufacturer	AMD	AMD
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption.	No data	No data
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability.	10-2015	10-2015
Model Official name.
Cores The number of physical cores.	8	8
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	8	8
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Missing	Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	4 GHz	3.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency The maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	No data	No data
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume.	No data	No data
Instructions
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No	No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	No data	No data
Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle.	No data	No data
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency.	No data	No data
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.

RAM

Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor.	No data	No data
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.
RAM bandwidth
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread.	No data	No data

PCI

configuration options

PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.	No data	No data
PCI
Number of PCI lanes	No data

Data security

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption.	No data	No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator.	No data	No data

Decoration

Dimensions	No data	No data
Supported sockets	No data	No data
Maximum processors per motherboard	No data	No data

Which is better

AMD FX-8350

• On average, gaming performance is 3% better.
• The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 3%.
• In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 1%.
• Price lower by $544
• Base clock higher by 0.5 GHz.

How are they similar

• The number of physical cores is the same.
• The number of threads is equal.

Compare AMD FX-8320E and AMD FX-8350

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8320E and AMD FX-8350 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s).

AMD FX-8320E

versus

AMD FX-8350

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8320E

• Newer processor, release date difference Approx. : 70.50°C vs 61°C
• Approximately 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt

Release date	2 September 2014 vs 23 October 2012
Maximum core temperature	70.50°C vs 61°C
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt vs 125 Watt

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8350

• About 5% more clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
• PassMark — Single thread mark about 11% faster: 1577 vs 1423
• PassMark — CPU mark about 19% better: 5997 vs 5054
• Geekbench 4 — Single Core about 14 % more: 566 vs 495
• About 22% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 2751 vs 2254
• About 19% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark% more: 3132 vs 2625
• About 21% more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 9.886 vs 8.196
• About 21% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark 22% more: 21.912 vs 17.954
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) approximately 13% more: 0.424 vs 0.374
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) approximately 10% more: 7.137 vs 6.463

Maximum frequency	4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
PassMark — Single thread mark	1577 vs 1423
PassMark — CPU mark	5997 vs 5054
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	566 vs 495
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	2751 vs 2254
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	3132 vs 2625
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.886 vs 8.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	21.912 vs 17.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.424 vs 0.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	7.137 vs 6.463

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-8320E
CPU 2: AMD FX-8350

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	17.954 21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD FX-8320E	AMD FX-8350
PassMark — Single thread mark	1423	1577
PassMark — CPU mark	5054	5997
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	495	566
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	2254	2751
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	2625	3132
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.196	9.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	17.954	21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.374	0.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.463	7.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		1.199

Feature comparison

	AMD FX-8320E	AMD FX-8350
Architecture name	Vishera	Vishera
Family	AMD FX-Series Processors	AMD FX-Series Processors
Issue date	September 2, 2014	October 23, 2012
OPN PIB	FD832EWMHKBOX	FD8350FRHKBOX
OPN Tray	FD832EWMW8KHK	FD8350FRW8KHK
Place in the rating	1797	1723
Price now	$94. 42	$79.99
Series	AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors	AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	23.45	32.95
Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	3.2 GHz	4 GHz
Crystal area	315 mm	315 mm
Level 1 cache	384KB	384KB
Level 2 cache	8MB	8MB
Level 3 cache	8MB	8MB
Process	32nm SOI	32nm SOI
Maximum core temperature	70.