AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600: What is the difference?
47points
AMD FX-8350
56points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Comparison winner
vs
66 facts in comparison
AMD FX-8350
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Why is AMD FX-8350 better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600?
- 1.67x faster CPU speed?
8 x 4GHzvs6 x 3.2GHz - 0.6GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHzvs3.6GHz - 5MB bigger L2 cache?
8MBvs3MB - 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.5MB/core - Has FMA4?
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 1600 better than AMD FX-8350?
- 801MHz higher ram speed?
2667MHzvs1866MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12vs8 - 34°C higher maximum operating temperature?
95°Cvs61°C - 18nm smaller semiconductor size?
14nmvs32nm - 60W lower TDP?
65Wvs125W - 2.
09x higher PassMark result?
12398vs5926 - 8MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs8MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
AMD FX-8350
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD FX-8350
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD FX-8350
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 4100
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD FX-8350
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD FX-8350
5 User reviews
AMD FX-8350
9.
8/10
5 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
10.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.6/10
5 votes
7.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
9.6/10
5 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
9.2/10
5 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Reliability
9.6/10
5 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Energy efficiency
8.6/10
5 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
CPU speed
8 x 4GHz
6 x 3.2GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
3.6GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD FX-8350
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
1MB/core
2.
67MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance.
(Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
310.8seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
948.6seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing.
Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
Memory
RAM speed
1866MHz
2667MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✖AMD FX-8350
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD FX-8350
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads.
This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔AMD FX-8350
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD FX-8350
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD FX-8350
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-8350 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD FX-8350 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Piledriver | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Vishera | Pinnacle Ridge | ||||||
| Family | FX-8000 | Ryzen 5 1000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
FD8350FRW8KHK, |
YD1600BBAFBOX |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2012 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm SOI | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 200.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 4,0 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 16 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-1866 |
DDR4-2667 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 29,9 GB/s | 39,74 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 125 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 650W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM3+ Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 61°C | 95°C | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | 97. 114 DMIPS |
— | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 231 | 445 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.597 | 3.689 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 100 | 154 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 669 | 1.245 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 484 | 915 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.355 | 6.603 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.573 | 2.088 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 5. 944 |
12.346 | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD FX-8350 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-8350 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
445 3.689 |
| AMD FX-8350 |
231 1.597 |
In single core, the difference is 93%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 131%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
154 1.245 |
| AMD FX-8350 |
100 669 |
In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 86%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene.
The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
915 6.603 |
| AMD FX-8350 |
484 3.355 |
In single core, the difference is 89%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 97%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server.
This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
2.088 12.346 |
| AMD FX-8350 |
1.573 5.944 |
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 108%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting.