2021 2020 Deep Learning Benchmarks Comparison: NVIDIA RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
NVIDIA RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
- Benchmarks
- Specifications
Best GPUs for Deep Learning, AI, compute in 2022 2023. Recommended GPUs. Recommended hardware for deep learning, AI research
Our deep learning, AI and 3d rendering GPU benchmarks will help you decide which NVIDIA RTX 4090, RTX 4080, RTX 3090, RTX 3080, A6000, A5000, or RTX 6000 ADA Lovelace is the best GPU for your needs. We provide in-depth analysis of each graphic card’s performance so you can make the most informed decision possible. We offer deep learning and 3d rendering benchmarks that will help you get the most out of your hardware.
- NVIDIA RTX 4090 vs. RTX 4080 vs. RTX 3090
- NVIDIA RTX 3080 vs. 3080 Ti vs. RTX 3090
- NVIDIA RTX 3090 vs. NVIDIA A6000
- NVIDIA A6000 vs.
A5000 vs. NVIDIA RTX 3090
- NVIDIA A100 vs. NVIDIA A6000
- NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti vs. Titan RTX vs Quadro RTX8000
- NVIDIA Titan RTX vs. Quadro RTX6000 vs. Quadro RTX8000
- NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 Ti
Deep Learning GPU Benchmarks 2022-2023
Resnet50 (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1071
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
2179
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
2922
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
8561
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
16797
Resnet50 (FP16 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Resnet50 (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
596
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
1001
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1625
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
3849
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
7557
Resnet50 (FP32 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Resnet152 (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
491
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
930
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1029
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
3557
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
6809
Resnet152 (FP16 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Resnet152 (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
223
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
409
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
434
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
1498
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
2851
Resnet152 (FP32 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Inception V3 (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
715
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
1283
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1720
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
5218
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
10122
Inception V3 (FP16 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Inception V3 (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
399
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
658
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1267
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
2568
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
5058
Inception V3 (FP32 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Inception V4 (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
383
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
616
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1022
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
2377
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
4532
Inception V4 (FP16 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Inception V4 (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
156
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
290
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
319
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
1031
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
1950
Inception V4 (FP32 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
VGG16 (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
577
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
1249
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1004
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
4989
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
10733
VGG16 (FP16 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
VGG16 (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
341
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
529
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
1077
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
2215
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
4278
VGG16 (FP32 XLA)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Googlenet (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Googlenet (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
3D, GPU Rendering Benchmarks 2022-2023
V-Ray
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
2185
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
1555
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Octane
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
769
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
498
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Redshift
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
2.
3
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Blender
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
6010.36
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
3788
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Luxmark
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
95123
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Unreal Engine
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
47.6
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
RELION Cryo-EM Benchmarks 2022-2023
Total run time
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
165.
9
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
178.9
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
57.1
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
50.3
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
BERT LARGE Training, Inference Benchmark 2022-2023
Training Time (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Performance (FP16)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Training Time (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Performance (FP32)
1 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
4 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
8 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3090
n/a
NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe)
n/a
Board Design
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 336 mm | 267 mm |
| Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Slot width | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
| TDP | 350 W | 250 W |
Clock Speeds
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| GPU Clock | 1395 MHz | 765 MHz |
| Memory Clock | 19500 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Graphics Card
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4. 0 x16 |
PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Generation | GeForce 30 | Tesla (Axx) |
Graphics Features
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| CUDA | 8.6 | 8.0 |
Graphics Processor
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Die Size | 628 mm2 | 826 mm2 |
| GPU Name | GA102-300-A1 | GA100 |
| Process Size | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | 28300 million | 54200 million |
Memory
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth | 936. 2 GB/s |
1555 GB/s |
| Memory Bus | 384 bit | 5120 bit |
| Memory Size | 24 GB | 40 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | HBM2e |
Render Config
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| ROPs | 112 | 160 |
| RT Cores | 82 | |
| Shading Units/ CUDA Cores | 10496 | 6912 |
| TMUs | 328 | 432 |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 432 |
Theoretical Performance
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| FP16 (half) performance | 35. 58 TFLOPS |
77.97 TFLOPS |
| FP32 (float) performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 19.49 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | 556 GFLOPS | 9746 GFLOPS |
| Pixel Rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 225.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 556 GTexel/s | 609.1 GTexel/s |
Price
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | 1499 $ | $ |
| Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 | Jun 22nd, 2020 |
Test bench configuration
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware | BIZON X5000 More details | BIZON X5000 More details |
| Software | 3D Rendering: Nvidia Driver: 456.  38VRay Benchmark: 5 Octane Benchmark: 2020.1.5 Redshift Benchmark: 3.0.28 Demo Blender: 2.90 Luxmark: 3.1 |
3D Rendering: Nvidia Driver: 461.09 VRay Benchmark: 5 Octane Benchmark: 2020.1.5 Redshift Benchmark: 3.0.28 Demo Blender: 2.90 Luxmark: 3.1 |
Recommended hardware
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 | NVIDIA A100 40 GB (PCIe) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best GPU workstations | BIZON X5500 | BIZON X5500 |
| Best NVIDIA GPU servers | BIZON X7000 |
Ultimate Comparison Nvidia Graphics Card [2023]
Sharing is caring!
If you think which one is better, if the comparison is made between Nvidia GTX and RTX series, then you will get your answer here in this article as we are going to cover GTX VS RTX: The Ultimate Comparison Nvidia Graphics Card in this article.
The Graphics card today is one of the most essential PC components that you cannot run your system without, or, if you try to run it, the performance won’t be as smooth as you expect it to be. In today’s market, you will come across two major companies when it comes to graphic cards, NVIDIA and AMD. Today we are going to talk about the NVIDIA one.
GTX VS RTX- Ultimate Comparison Nvidia Graphics Card
Though it is not an easy task to simply pick an NVIDIA graphics card. You will likely stumble on the suffixes like RTX and GTX and will start wondering what they are. Don’t worry as we’ve got you covered.
Initially, whenever an individual wanted to go for a new graphics card, the simple option was to go with NVIDIA. Further down this lane, you would have likely encountered both the RTX and GTX series. If you’re confused as to which one of them you should go for, you’ve come to the right place.
GTX VS RTX: The Ultimate Comparison Nvidia Graphics Card
Table of Contents
What is GTX?
GTX stands for Giga Texel shader eXtreme and is one of the graphics card variants under the brand GeForce, owned by Nvidia.
The GTX cards were first introduced in 2008 with series 200, and this series was codenamed, Tesla.
The first product down the line of the GTX series was GTX 260, and if you wanted to opt for the expensive one, then GTX 280 was the one to go for. The introduction of the GTX series cards impacted the naming scheme of the graphics card, and from their release onwards, Nvidia used a naming scheme that has GTX/GT as a prefix followed by each of their model numbers.
Also Read: 5 Cheapest 4K Graphics Cards for Gaming PC [2022]
A good thing about the graphics card series was that with every other major release in the series, NVIDIA kept on changing the microarchitecture on which its cards were based.
For example; series 200 & 300 used Tesla architecture, series 400 & 500 used Fermi architecture, etc. The latest of all in the series is the GTX series 16 based on Turing architecture that came into existence in 2019 and consists of GTX 1650, GTX 1660, GTX 1660Ti, and its Super counterparts.
What is GTX
GTX VS RTX Comparison [2022]
If we want to compare the GTX and RTX, there are some basic differences between the two cards which can be presented with the help of an example of GTX 1080Ti and RTX 2080. It is seen that if we talk about 4K gaming, then the RTX 2080 card is capable of beating the GTX 1080Ti. As the RTX 2080 uses a faster GDDR6 memory, it results in better resolutions.
Must Read: 7 Best Mini ITX Motherboard for Gaming PC in 2022 [Review]
The RTX 2080 also offers additional rendering improvements and even supports Real-Time Ray Tracing and DLSS with less money to spend. Though it might sound impressive to you, if you are someone who isn’t much involved in visuals, then the RTX card is not for you.
Since 4K monitors are one of the most expensive ones in the market and allowing Ray Tracing may further reduce your frame rates, the GTX 1080Ti, on the other hand, performs better in some games today compared to the RTX 2080.
In short, you can say that Nvidia’s GTX 1080Ti will perform better in some games; however, it is not worth the extra cash that you put in, and since the RTX graphics cards these days come with extra features of Ray Tracing and DLSS, it is a better choice for mid to high-end PCs.
Also Read: 10 Best Motherboard for Ryzen 9 5900x in 2022
| GTX VS RTX: Parameters of Comparison |
|---|
| 1. Price |
| 2. Ray Tracing and RT Cores |
| 3. Performance |
| 4. Size and Dimensions |
| 5. GPU Architecture |
Price
Price is one of the most important differences between the GPUs. The RTX series that we see today comprises newer models if we compare them to the GTX series. So, for this reason, the RTX series is more expensive compared to the GTX ones. The difference lies at around $100 for every model that you go for.
Related: MSI Gaming GS63 Review in 2022 [Powerful Gaming Laptop]
Though the price difference is considered to be reasonable for the RTX series that we see today as they have newer models along with some additional features. However, you won’t see a lot of performance differences between the two.
Price Comparison between GTX VS RTX
Ray Tracing and RT Cores
Ray Tracing is one of the few features that make the Nvidia RTX series really different from the GTX ones. Though playing games without ray tracing is possible, however, with ray tracing, the in-game graphics seem more realistic. The shades and lights can be better seen when Ray Tracing is in use.
Must Read: Acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop Review 2022 [Things to Know]
The RTX series has hardware specifically dedicated to Ray Tracing purposes, which is not the case with the GTX series. You will see that with the Ray Tracing in real-time the RTX series are the only GPUs to include RT cores.
Ray Tracing and RT Cores Comparison between GTX VS RTX
Performance
If we talk about the Performance between the GTX and RTX series, the RTX is said to perform better because of features like Ray Tracing and RT cores and also because it is newer compared to the GTX series. However, in terms of numbers, the difference isn’t huge and you won’t be dissatisfied if you go for the GTX series either.
Performance of GTX and RTX
Size and Dimensions
The isn’t a lot of difference between the GTX and the RTX series in terms of size and dimensions, as both GPUs these days can easily fit in modern PCs irrespective of their class.
Size & Dimensions of GTX and RTX
GPU Architecture
The architecture of the GPU determines its performance as it deals with factors like clock speeds, performance, and the quality of graphics. In terms of architecture, there is a really small difference that we see between the both of them.
The GTX and the RTX series use the Nvidia Turing architecture, and it is the best in the market right now.
GPU Architecture: GTX VS RTX
Frequently Asked Questions
FAQ 1: Which one should I buy, RTX or GTX?
Answer: You should go for the RTX series if you want good graphics performance from your system.
FAQ 2: In terms of overall performance which is better, RTX or GTX?
Answer: The RTX series is better than the GTX one.
We have now ended our guide on GTX VS RTX: The Ultimate Comparison Nvidia Graphics Card. We hope the GTX VS RTX series guide gives you a better understanding of these two Graphics Card Series from Nvidia.
If you like this article on GTX VS RTX, share it with your friends and keep visiting omggamer.com for more updates on gaming, upcoming games, gaming builds, and much more.
How useful was this post?
Click on a star to rate it!
Average rating 0 / 5.
Vote count: 0
No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.
Video card Nvidia GeForce 315 OEM 1 GB
Home / Video cards / Nvidia GeForce 315 OEM 1 GB
- Issue date: February, 2011;
- Video card memory size: 1024 MB;
- Video memory type: DDR3;
- GPU clock: 589 MHz.
Specifications Nvidia GeForce 315 OEM 1 GB
GPU
| GPU manufacturer | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | GT218 |
| Platform | Desktop |
| Clock frequency | 589MHz |
| Two processors | No |
| Reference card | Nvidia GeForce 315 OEM 506 MHz 256 MB |
Performance
| Number of shaders | 16 |
|---|---|
| Number of texture units (TMU) | 8 |
| Number of ROPs | 4 |
| Pixel fill rate | 2. 36GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 4.71 GTexel/s |
| Number of floating point operations (FLOPS) | 44.86GFLOPS |
Memory
| Memory clock | 600MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory frequency | 1.200 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 64bit |
| Video memory size | 1.024MB |
| Memory type | DDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB/s |
Energy consumption
| Energy consumption | 33W |
|---|
Benchmarks GeForce 315 OEM 1 GB
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)
| GeForce 315 | 1,839.9 | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GT 610 | 1,526.66 | |
| GeForce GT 8800 | no data | 9.6 GB/s |
| GeForce GT 8800 | 64.6 GB/s | |
| GeForce GT 610 | 9.6 GB/s |
peersPixel fill rate
The number of pixels that the video card can display on the screen every second
| GeForce 315 | 2.36GPixel/s |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 8800 | 11.2GPixel/s |
| GeForce GT 610 | 1.62 GPixel/s |
Texture Fill Rate
Rate at which the graphics card renders textures
| GeForce 315 | 4.71 GTexel/s |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 8800 | 39.2 GTexel/s |
| GeForce GT 610 | 6.48 GTexel/s |
Number of floating point operations (FLOPS)
Video card calculation speed
| GeForce 315 | 44.86GFLOPS |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 8800 | 392 GFLOPS |
| GeForce GT 610 | 155. 52GFLOPS |
Number of shader units
Shaders — GPU subcomponents that work with three-dimensional graphics
| GeForce 315 | 16 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 8800 | 112 |
| GeForce GT 610 | 48 |
Number of texture units (TMU)
Reviews of the GeForce 315 OEM 1 GB
Pizdabol!!!! Guys, don’t believe him, I have the same components and the graphics are almost at a minimum, while the friezes are so terrible, it’s simply not possible to play !!!!!
no, well, it’s clear that another is needed.
I, too, have had a performance for a long time. But if a freebie is attached … It will come in handy. You can cool powerful LEDs
Intel core i3 2120 3.30 3.30 2 cores 4 threads, geforce gts 250 1gb 256bit, 8gb ram will go with a resolution of 1366 × 768 and with fxaa 9 anti-aliasing0004
I have freezes due to the fact that there is only 4 GB of RAM, Windows eats 2 GB and only 2 GB remains for the game and I watched the program, everything is bad
Tags:1024 MB, 589 MHz, DDR3, GeForce 315 OEM 1 GB, GPU, Nvidia
Nvidia MX130 (notebook) — test in 23 games, including the most demanding
Nvidia MX130
-laptop 2018, with an Intel Core i7-8650U processor and an Nvidia GeForce MX130 base-level graphics card. The laptop is not a gaming laptop, but the result of this fairly new video card in comparison with older gaming ones is interesting. The emphasis is solely on testing hardware, those who want to see a review of this particular laptop can find enough materials on the Internet.
Jurassic World Evolution
Doom (2016)
Borderlands 3
Metro Exodus
Just Cause 4
PUBG
Forza Horizon 4
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Watch Dogs 20368 FIFA 2020
Results
Additional information
A couple of screenshots of the tested iron:
Processor: Intel Core I7-8650U, Frequencies 8, Frequences, Frequencies, Frequencies, Frequent .
Core i7-8650U
Video card Nvidia GeForce MX130 2 Gb.
Nvidia GeForce MX130
For testing, the laptop was equipped with 16 GB of RAM and a Micron M600 512 GB SSD.
Synthetic tests
RealBench 2.
56
Benchmark from the Asus ROG website, consists of several Image Editing, Encoding, OpenCl, Heavy multitasking subtests. The result is given in points and plus the execution time.
RealBench
Corona v 1.3
Multi-threaded benchmark that performs 3D scene rendering. In our testing, the laptop scored 1,557,940 Rays/sec, and finished the test in 5:11 minutes.
Corona v 1.3
Cinebench 11.5
Popular benchmark based on Cinema 4D animation software. The processor test renders a photorealistic scene consisting of about 2,000 objects and 300,000 polygons.
In our testing, the laptop scored points in the CPU test 7.7.
Cinebench 11.5
Cinebench R15
Updated version of the benchmark.
In our testing, the laptop scored 701 points.
Cinebench R15
3D Mark
The de facto standard for testing graphics cards and 3D performance.
Consists of several tests of varying complexity. It is this benchmark that is used by video chip and video card manufacturers, test labs, computer magazines and gamers.
Cloud Gate tableCloud GateSky Diver tableSky DiverFire Strike table
Time Spy tableTime Spy
Games
World of Tanks Encore
A benchmark was released during the redesign of the popular online game World of Tanks. Allows you to test on low, medium and ultra graphics settings, you can also change the resolution and quality of anti-aliasing.
WoT Encore tableWoT Encore fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Game of 2015, still popular game, with open world and good graphics. There is a built-in benchmark, which makes it easy to use it for testing hardware.
GTA V tableGTA V fps
GRID 2
The game is from 2013, but the built-in benchmark and a rich selection of graphics presets make it convenient for testing and comparison. Despite the year of release in 2013, at ultra graphics settings, the performance of the video card should be quite good even by modern standards.
GRID 2 tableGRID 2 fps
Fallout 4
Cult and very popular game of 2015, graphics and system requirements are still relevant today. The only negative for testing is the 60 fps limit, the test laptop gives out these 60 fps in any mode, so in this case the game is not suitable for testing.
Fallout 4 tableFallout 4 fps
Witcher 3
The third Witcher game of 2015, but it is one of the most popular games until today. Very high graphics standards, even at the minimum settings the game will run only on powerful hardware.
Witcher 3 tableWitcher 3 fps
Far Cry 5
Game of 2018, with high requirements and excellent graphics, there is a built-in benchmark.
Far Cry 5 tableFar Cry 5 fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands
Game of 2017, correspondingly high requirements and excellent graphics, there is a built-in benchmark.
Ghost Recon Wildlands tableGhost Recon Wildlands fps
Bonus
And as a bonus popular games, only videos without detailed testing.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Popular multiplayer first-person shooter.
Fortnite
A multi-platform battle royale video game developed and published by Epic Games. Up to 100 players compete in a «battle royale» where players fight against each other to be the last survivor. Players can choose how to enter the match: alone, in pairs or in a squad of four. In either case, the last person or team left alive wins the match.
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
A multi-platform Action/RPG video game developed by Ubisoft Quebec and published by Ubisoft.
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey puts even more emphasis on role-playing than previous games in the series. The game has an interactive dialogue system, non-linear quests, various endings.
Battlefield 5
First-person shooter computer game, the fifteenth in the Battlefield series, developed by EA DICE and published by Electronic Arts.
Jurassic World Evolution
An economic simulation video game developed by Frontier Developments for Xbox One, Windows and PlayStation 4 and released on June 12, 2018. The game is based on the movie series of the same name.
Doom (2016)
A first-person shooter computer game that is the second reboot of the series of the same name.
Developed by id Software in collaboration with Certain Affinity and published by Bethesda Softworks.
Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3, like the previous games in the series, is an RPG first-person shooter with the possibility of cooperative play.
Metro Exodus
First-person shooter with elements of survival horror and stealth action. Actions take place in the post-apocalyptic wastelands of Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan, where the player must cope with the new dangers of the world and participate in the fight against mutated creatures, as well as hostile people.
Just Cause 4
The game takes place in a fictional South American country called Solis.
In this part of Just Cause, Rico Rodriguez will fight the Black Hand organization.
PUBG
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds is an action game in which up to 100 players fight in a «battle royale».
Forza Horizon 4
An open-world arcade racing game. The game takes place in the UK, the gameplay is focused on the interaction between players in multiplayer mode.
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Like previous games in the series, Mass Effect: Andromeda is a third-person action/RPG; the player controls the hero — one of the two Riders, Scott or Sarah.
Watch Dogs 2
Watch Dogs 2 has a set of main missions, set up missions, and side quests. In terms of structure, key operations are reminiscent of a robbery in GTA 5 and murders in Assassin’s Creed 2. However, unlike the protagonists of these games, the heroes here are not criminals or murderers, but hackers.
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided is an action/RPG game with elements of stealth action. As in Human Revolution, the player takes control of Adam Jensen. For most of the game, the player is free to roam through several open locations, where they can complete main and side quests, buy and upgrade weapons, eliminate opponents, communicate with characters, and explore the game world.