GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro P600 Graphics cards Comparison
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro P600. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro P600. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Check Price
Quadro P600
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P600 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro P600.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro P600.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro P600 are build with Pascal architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P600 is 139 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro P600 — by 14 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 145 mm.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 1996 MHz higher, than Quadro P600.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro P600 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro P600 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Fortnite is 81% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro P600. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro P600. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P600 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | N17P-G1 | GP107 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 October 2016 | 14 November 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1291 MHz | 1430 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66. 82 | 37.37 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 1,117 gflops |
Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1. 2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.3 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 326 Mh/s | |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 1.01 Gh/s | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 12.62 Mh/s | |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 156.48 Sol/s | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T1000
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
- Quadro P600 vs Quadro T1000
- Quadro P600 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon Pro 560
- Quadro P600 vs GeForce GTX 960M
- Quadro P600 vs Radeon Pro 560
NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA Quadro P600
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 477 vs 323
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 75 Watt |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 477 vs 323 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1557 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 5919 vs 3254
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 21864 vs 11181
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 35.134
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 141.164
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4662
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4662
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1557 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 1,117 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 5919 vs 3254 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 21864 vs 11181 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 35.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 141.164 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 4662 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 3254 | 5919 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 477 | 323 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 11181 | 21864 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP107 | GP106B |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Place in performance rating | 516 | 434 |
Price now | $169. 99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 2,488 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 34. 92 GTexel / s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
DirectX | 12. 0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro P600 GPU Comparison
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
GPU Comparison
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
Overall Score
General gaming and workstation score
14 %
16%
slightly better overall score
Flux Core frame rate
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
17 FPS
3 FPS
slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
14 FPS
Electron frame rate
Randomly generated noise sphere test
12 FPS
2 FPS
slightly higher Electron frame rate
10 FPS
City frame rate
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
12 FPS
2 FPS
slightly higher City frame rate
10 FPS
Clouds frame rate
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
9 FPS
0 FPS
slightly higher Clouds frame rate
Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and the Quadro P600? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
Download GPU Benchmark
Geekbench (CUDA) score
CUDA compute benchmark
18,936
78%
significantly higher Geekbench (CUDA) score
10,634
Geekbench (OpenCL) score
OpenCL compute benchmark
20,678
84%
significantly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score
11,181
Geekbench (Vulkan) score
Vulkan compute benchmark
18,970
83%
significantly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score
10,334
Core Clock Speed
Nominal chip frequency
1,151 MHz
1,354 MHz
17%
slightly higher core clock speed
Boost Clock Speed
Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met
1,291 MHz
1,557 MHz
20%
slightly higher boost clock speed
Memory
Onboard memory size for textures and vertices
4 GiB
100%
significantly more memory
Memory Bus Width
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit
Memory Bandwidth
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
112 GB/s
74%
significantly higher memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
TDP
Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU
40 W
87%
significantly lower TDP
Pixel Rate
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
41 Gigapixels/s
65%
significantly higher pixel rate
25 Gigapixels/s
Texture Rate
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
62 Gigatexels/s
65%
significantly higher texture rate
37 Gigatexels/s
Shading Units
Number of processors dedicated to shader processing
768
100%
significantly more shading units
Texture Mapping Units
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
48
100%
significantly more texture mapping units
Render Output Processors
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
32
100%
significantly more render output processors
Rank
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
203rd
of 526
225th
of 526
Release date
The official date of release of this chip
January 2018
February 2017
Memory Type
The type of memory used by this chip
GDDR5
GDDR5
DirectX Support
Maximum version of DirectX supported
12. 0
12.0
OpenGL Support
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
4.6
4.5
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro P600 benchmarks
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GPU is faster than the Quadro P600 in gaming.
Our database shows that the Quadro P600 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro P600 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.
Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn’t directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.
In addition, the Quadro P600 has a significantly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.
In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q over the Quadro P600.
Latest posts
How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022
How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022
Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022
Popular GPU Comparisons
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3060
Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comparison which is better?
General information | |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
57.2% | 59.7%
2.5% (4.4%) better than |
Architecture |
|
Pascal | Pascal |
Codename |
|
GP107 | GP107 |
Type |
|
For workstations | Desktop |
Release price |
|
178 $ | $139
-39 $ (-21.9%) better than |
Number of shaders |
|
384 | 768
384 (100%) better than |
Core clock |
|
1430MHz
139 MHz (10.8%) better than |
1291 MHz |
Boost frequency |
|
1557 MHz
165 MHz (11. 9%) better than |
1392 MHz |
Number of transistors |
|
3.300 million | 3.300 million |
Process |
|
14 nm | 14 nm |
Interface |
|
PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
40W
-35 W (-46.7%) better than |
75 W |
Length |
|
145 mm | 145 mm |
Additional power connectors |
|
no | no |
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
Multi Monitor |
|
+ | + |
3D Vision |
|
n/a | + |
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies. |
|
n/a | + |
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
+ | + |
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously. |
|
n/a | + |
Maximum temperature |
|
n/a | 97 °C |
Ansel |
|
Decred / DCR (Decred) |
|
n/a | 1.01 Gh/s |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) |
|
n/a | 1 Sol/s |
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
n/a | 768 |
Video connectors |
|
4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DirectX |
|
12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Floating point performance |
|
1. 117 gflops | 2.138 gflops |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
n/a | 12.62 Mh/s |
Memory | |
Memory type |
|
GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
2 GB | 4 GB
2 GB (100%) better than |
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
128bit | 128 bit |
Shared memory |
|
— | — |
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
4008 MHz | 7008 MHz
At 3000 MHz (74.9%) better than |
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
64.13 | 112
47.87 (74.6%) better than |
Comparison of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA Quadro P600
versus
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA Quadro P600
- A newer graphics card manufacturing process makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption 9 6 90 nm5: 14 90 nm5: 14 90 nm5 Approximately 88% less power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
- PassMark — G2D Mark performance approximately 48% greater: 477 vs 323
- About 1% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3687
- About 1% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
- GFX benchmark 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) about 1% more: 3715 vs 3687
- GFXBench 4.0 performance — T-Rex (Fps) about 1% more: 3359 vs 3336
Workflow0006 | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 75 Watt |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 477 vs 323 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3336 |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- About 12% faster core clock: 1493 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 4% faster core clock in Boost mode: 1620 MHz vs 1557 MHz 34. 92 GTexel / s
- 2x more shader processor(s): 768 vs 384
- 2.2x greater floating point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
- 2x more max memory size ): 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 75% faster memory clock: 7008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- About 82% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 5919 vs 3254
- About 96% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 211864 vs 10186
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 75.758 vs 35.134
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark: 301.168 vs 141.164
- About 82% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 8496 vs 4662
- About 82% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 8496 vs 4662
- 1. 49 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
1.73 TFLOPS vs 0.25 TFLOPS - 33.87 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
36.43 GPixel/s vs 2.56 GPixel/s - 952MHz faster memory speed?
1752MHz vs 800MHz - 5408MHz higher effective clock speed?
7008MHz vs 1600MHz - 2x more VRAM?
2GB vs 1GB - 62.66 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
72.86 GTexels/s vs 10.2 GTexels/s - 1 newer version of DirectX?
12 vs 11 - 35W below TDP?
40W vs 75W - Supports multi-monitor technology?
- Supports 2 more displays?
2 vs 0
9
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 3254 | 5919 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 477 | 323 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 11181 | 21864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35. 134 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 2340 |
Feature comparison
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Codename | GP107 | GP106B |
Production date | February 7, 2017 | February 1, 2017 |
Price at first issue date | $178 | |
Place in the ranking | 516 | 434 |
Price now | $169. 99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 11/22 | |
Boost core clock | 1557 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Core frequency | 1329MHz | 1493 MHz |
Floating point performance | 1.117 gflops | 2.488 gflops |
Process | 14nm | 16 nm |
Number of shaders | 384 | 768 |
Texturing speed | 34. 92 GTexel/s | 77.76 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Video connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC 9 support0006 | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145mm | |
Additional power connectors | None | |
Notebook size | large | |
DirectX | 12. 0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulcan | ||
Maximum memory size | 2GB | 4GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory frequency | 4012 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Multi-monitor support | ||
Multi-Projection |