Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB vs 1660
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Watch Gameplay
CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max |
221 EFps | 221 EFps | ||||
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max |
72 EFps | +4% | 69 EFps | |||
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max |
83 EFps | Better Overwatch EFps. +14% |
73 EFps | |||
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max |
79 EFps | 79 EFps | ||||
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max |
101 EFps | Better Fortnite EFps. +20% |
84 EFps |
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,608,504 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
220,505 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Asus(1043 86BB)
Worst Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3793) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63%
Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 688
1,387,999 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% PNY(196E 119F)
Poor: 53%
Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 94th / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
68.7 % | Faster effective speed. +21% |
57 % |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
91.6 fps | Better lighting effects. +30% |
70.6 fps | |||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
92 fps | Better reflection handling. +17% |
78.9 fps | |||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
66 fps | 67.1 fps | +2% | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
79.6 fps | Faster NBody calculation. +12% |
71.2 fps |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
98. 3 fps | Better peak lighting effects. +28% |
76.6 fps | |||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
124 fps | Better peak reflection handling. +11% |
112 fps | |||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
71.7 fps | +1% | 70.9 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
84.3 fps | Faster peak NBody calculation. +11% |
75.9 fps |
Market Share
Based on 55,614,409 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0. 74 % | 2.35 % | Hugely higher market share. +218% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
85.7 % | 234 % | Hugely better value. +173% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
77 % | 89 % | More popular. +16% |
|||
Price Price (score) |
$190 | $58 | Much cheaper. +70% |
Age Newest |
43 Months | Much more recent. +43% |
75 Months | |||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
85. 8 fps | Better peak texture detail. +13% |
75.8 fps | |||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
76 fps | Slightly faster peak complex splatting. +6% |
71.8 fps | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
77.3 fps | Better texture detail. +13% |
68.4 fps | |||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
69.8 fps | Slightly faster complex splatting. +5% |
66.4 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
-
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB vs 1660S (Super)
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Watch Gameplay
CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max |
232 EFps | +5% | 221 EFps | |||
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max |
86 EFps | Better GTAV EFps. +25% |
69 EFps | |||
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max |
97 EFps | Much Better Overwatch EFps. +33% |
73 EFps | |||
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max |
93 EFps | Better PUBG EFps. +18% |
79 EFps | |||
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max |
116 EFps | Much Better Fortnite EFps. +38% |
84 EFps |
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,792,069 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
404,070 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 74% MSI(1462 C75A)
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 1068)
Poor: 65%
Great: 74%
SPEED RANK: 80th / 688
1,387,999 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% PNY(196E 119F)
Poor: 53%
Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 94th / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
70. 5 % | Faster effective speed. +24% |
57 % |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
90.1 fps | Better lighting effects. +28% |
70.6 fps | |||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
93.1 fps | Better reflection handling. +18% |
78.9 fps | |||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
112 fps | Much faster multi rendering. +67% |
67.1 fps | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
79. 1 fps | Faster NBody calculation. +11% |
71.2 fps |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
96 fps | Better peak lighting effects. +25% |
76.6 fps | |||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
125 fps | Better peak reflection handling. +12% |
112 fps | |||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
117 fps | Much faster peak multi rendering. +65% |
70.9 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
82. 8 fps | Slightly faster peak NBody calculation. +9% |
75.9 fps |
Market Share
Based on 55,614,409 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
1.77 % | 2.35 % | Much higher market share. +33% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
72.7 % | 234 % | Hugely better value. +222% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
94 % | Slightly more popular. +6% |
89 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$230 | $58 | Much cheaper. +75% |
Age Newest |
35 Months | Much more recent. +53% |
75 Months | |||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
92.3 fps | Better peak texture detail. +22% |
75.8 fps | |||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
74.9 fps | +4% | 71.8 fps | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
83.2 fps | Better texture detail. +22% |
68.4 fps | |||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
70. 6 fps | Slightly faster complex splatting. +6% |
66.4 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
The GTX 1660 Super has a launch price of just $230 USD with comparable performance to the $280 USD 1660 Ti. The 1660 Super has 14 Gbps GDDR6 (versus 12Gbps GDDR6 for the 1660 Ti and 8Gbps GDDR5 for the 1660). The 1660 range of cards sit in the sweet spot for many gamers because they offer superb 1080p EFps in popular titles and they are relatively hassle free in terms of noise, compatibility and stability. The 1660S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Shop prices will determine which 1660 series card represents the best value over time but at today’s prices the 1660 Super effectively undercuts the 1660 Ti by $50 USD thus challenging the RX 590 in terms of overall value at 1080p. The next step up from the 1660S would be to the $325 RTX 2060. [Oct ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card provided prices settle appropriately. [Jul ’16 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (7,141)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (5,668)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (4,854)
- Asus PRIME B450M-A (3,761)
- Asrock B450M Pro4 (3,378)
- MSI B450M PRO-VDH MAX (MS-7A38) (3,303)
- Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (3,162)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (4,940)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (3,303)
- MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) (3,220)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (2,976)
- Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (2,753)
- Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (2,692)
- MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (2,298)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
-
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB vs 1660
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Watch Gameplay
CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max |
221 EFps | Better CSGO EFps. +27% |
174 EFps | |||
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max |
72 EFps | Better GTAV EFps. +20% |
60 EFps | |||
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max |
83 EFps | Better Overwatch EFps. +15% |
72 EFps | |||
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max |
79 EFps | Slightly Better PUBG EFps. +10% |
72 EFps | |||
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max |
101 EFps | Better Fortnite EFps. +28% |
79 EFps |
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 807,312 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
220,505 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Asus(1043 86BB)
Worst Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3793) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63%
Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 688
586,807 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% EVGA(3842 6160)
Worst Bench: 50% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
Poor: 50%
Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 103rd / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
68. 7 % | Much faster effective speed. +30% |
52.7 % |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
91.6 fps | Much better lighting effects. +42% |
64.3 fps | |||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
92 fps | Much better reflection handling. +30% |
70.6 fps | |||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
66 fps | +0% | 65.9 fps | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
79.6 fps | Faster NBody calculation. +20% |
66.5 fps |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
98.3 fps | Much better peak lighting effects. +43% |
68.6 fps | |||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
124 fps | Better peak reflection handling. +24% |
99.9 fps | |||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
71.7 fps | +5% | 68.5 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
84.3 fps | Faster peak NBody calculation. +20% |
70 fps |
Market Share
Based on 55,614,409 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.74 % | 1.1 % | Much higher market share. +49% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
85.7 % | Much better value. +58% |
54.3 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
77 % | More popular. +17% |
66 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$190 | Cheaper. +17% |
$230 |
Age Newest |
43 Months | Much more recent. +42% |
74 Months | |||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
85.8 fps | Better peak texture detail. +28% |
67.2 fps | |||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
76 fps | Faster peak complex splatting. +17% |
64.8 fps | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
77.3 fps | Better texture detail. +26% |
61.3 fps | |||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
69.8 fps | Faster complex splatting. +16% |
60.2 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.