Gtx 460 vs hd 7570: AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs Nvidia GTX 460

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 7570

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 460

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.

Supports PhysX

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7570

100 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 460 .

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

---

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 460

Based on theoretical specifications.

Core Configuration

	GeForce GTX 460		Radeon HD 7570
GPU Name	GF104 (GF104-300-KB-A1)	vs	Turks (Turks PRO-L)
Fab Process	40 nm	vs	40 nm
Die Size	332 mm²	vs	118 mm²
Transistors	1,950 million	vs	716 million
Shaders	336	vs	480
Compute Units	7	vs	6
Core clock	675 MHz	vs	650 MHz
ROPs	32	vs	8
TMUs	56	vs	24

Memory Configuration

	GeForce GTX 460		Radeon HD 7570
Memory Type	GDDR5	vs	GDDR3
Bus Width	256 bit	vs	128 bit
Memory Speed	900 MHz 3600 MHz effective	vs	800 MHz 1600 MHz effective
Memory Size	1024 Mb	vs	1024 Mb

Additional details

	GeForce GTX 460		Radeon HD 7570
TDP	160 watts	vs	60 watts
Release Date	12 Jul 2010	vs	5 Jan 2012

• GeForce GTX 460

  9. 45 GP/s

• Radeon HD 7570

  5.20 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

• GeForce GTX 460

  37.80 GT/s

• Radeon HD 7570

  15.60 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

• GeForce GTX 460

  115.00 GB/s

• Radeon HD 7570

  25.60 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

• GeForce GTX 460

  907.20 GFLOPs

• Radeon HD 7570

  624.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

	VS
GeForce GTX 460		GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

	VS
GeForce GTX 460		Radeon R7 250X

	VS
Radeon HD 7570		GeForce GT 730 GDDR5

	VS
Radeon HD 7570		Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7850K)

	VS
Radeon R7 360E		GeForce GTX 750 v2

	VS
GeForce GTX 750 v2		Radeon R7 360

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Buy on Amazon

vs

AMD Radeon HD 7570

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 17. 98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 2249 vs 608
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 471 vs 256
• 5.1x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 6869 vs 1344
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 4.874
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 259.769
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.487
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 vs 14. 033
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 57.396
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1389
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1389

Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 5 January 2012
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark	2249 vs 608
PassMark — G2D Mark	471 vs 256
Geekbench — OpenCL	6869 vs 1344
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.112 vs 4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	297.631 vs 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.427 vs 0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.363 vs 14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	99.125 vs 57.396
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970 vs 1389
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970 vs 1389

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2490
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3329
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2490
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3329

Pipelines	480 vs 384
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	2724 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	2724 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570

PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	297.631 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.363 14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.125 57.396
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K620	AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark — G3D Mark	2249	608
PassMark — G2D Mark	471	256
Geekbench — OpenCL	6869	1344
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.112	4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	297.631	259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.427	0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.363	14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	99.125	57.396
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970	1389
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	2490	2724
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3329	3355
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970	1389
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	2490	2724
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3329	3355
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	702

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K620	AMD Radeon HD 7570
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Code name	GM107	Turks
Launch date	22 July 2014	5 January 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$189. 89
Place in performance rating	844	1148
Price now	$189.93
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	15.23
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	863. 2 gflops	624 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	480
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s	15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	716 million
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Interface	PCIe 2.