GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti Graphics cards Comparison
When comparing GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Check Price
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 150% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti — with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 4 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 1 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 August 2012 | 18 February 2014 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 102. 5 billion/sec | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Length | 9.5″ (24.1 cm) | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1. 1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.25 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | 640 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | 4 displays |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | + |
3D Vision | + | + |
3D Vision Live | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 99 Mh/s | 183 Mh/s |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 0. 51 Gh/s | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.3 Mh/s | |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 74.4 Sol/s | |
Blu Ray 3D | + | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 M390X
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro P1000
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 M390X
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro P1000
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti: What is the difference?
41points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
40points
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
EVGAEVGA Superclocked
vs
54 facts in comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti?
- 105MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1020MHzvs915MHz - 90W lower TDP?
60Wvs150W - 105MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1085MHzvs980MHz - 13°C lower load GPU temperature?
62°Cvs75°C - 6°C lower idle GPU temperature?
25°Cvs31°C - 9. 6dB lower load noise level?
38.3dBvs47.9dB - 4dB lower idle noise level?
37.8dBvs41.8dB - 38W lower power consumption when idle?
73Wvs111W
Why is Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
- 1.15 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
2.46 TFLOPSvs1.31 TFLOPS - 9.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
25.6 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s - 152MHz faster memory clock speed?
1502MHzvs1350MHz - 608MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
6008MHzvs5400MHz - 61.2 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
102 GTexels/svs40.8 GTexels/s - 57.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
144GB/svs86.4GB/s - 64bit wider memory bus width?
192bitvs128bit - 704 more shading units?
1344vs640
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
MSI Radeon RX 580
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti WindForce X2 OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
10. 0/10
2 User reviews
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
0 User reviews
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
8.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
7.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Fan noise
5.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1020MHz
915MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1085MHz
980MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.pixel rate
16. 3 GPixel/s
25.6 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
1.31 TFLOPS
2.46 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
40.8 GTexels/s
102 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1350MHz
1502MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
5400MHz
6008MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
86.4GB/s
144GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
128bit
192bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✖Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✔Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✖Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✔Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✖Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✔Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti)
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
156%
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
100%
Relative performance
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
120%
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
20% higher gaming performance. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
90 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 660 Ti . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (6 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | GK104 (GK104-300-KD-A2) | vs | GM107 (GM107-400-A2) | |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm | |
Die Size | 294 mm² | vs | 148 mm² | |
Transistors | 3,540 million | vs | 1,870 million | |
Shaders | 1344 | vs | 640 | |
Compute Units | 7 | vs | 5 | |
Core clock | 915 MHz | vs | 1020 MHz | |
ROPs | 24 | vs | 16 | |
TMUs | 112 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | |
Memory Speed | 1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective |
vs | 1350 MHz 5400 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 150 watts | vs | 60 watts | |
Release Date | 16 Aug 2012 | vs | 18 Feb 2014 |
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
25. 60 GP/s
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
16.32 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
102.00 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
40.80 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
144.00 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
86.40 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
2460.00 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1305.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
8790
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5610
Points (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
36
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
30
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
29
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality,DDOD, FX AA
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
59
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
48
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Very High Quality, FXAA
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
37
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
25
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
47
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
43
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 550 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 370X |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon Vega 8 |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 560X | Radeon RX 560D |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 560D | Radeon RX 560 |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
0024 1020MHz vs 915MHz
60W vs 150W
1085MHz vs 980MHz
62°C vs 75°C
25°C vs 31°C
38.3dB vs 47.9dB
37.8dB vs 41.8dB
73W vs 111W
- 1.15 TFLOPS over FLOPS?
2.46 TFLOPS vs 1.31 TFLOPS - 9.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
25.6 GPixel/s vs 16.3 GPixel/s - 152MHz faster memory speed?
1502MHz vs 1350MHz - 608MHz higher effective clock speed?
6008MHz vs 5400MHz - 61. 2 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
144GB/s vs 86.4GB/s - 64bit wider memory bus?
192bit vs 128bit - 704 more stream processors?
1344 vs 640
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
MSI Radeon RX 580
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Nvidia GeForce GTX 9003 vs 9003
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 970
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 750 TI
VS
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Palit GeForce GTX 660 TS
NVIDIA GTX 660 9000 9000 9000 GTX 660 9000 9000 GTX 660 9000 9000 GTX 660 9000 GTX 660 9000 GTX 660 9000 GTX0003
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti WindForce X2 OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
0021
General rating
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2 Reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 TI
10. 0 /10
9000 4000 TIETX 660 TITX 660 TITX 6604 GeForce GTX 660 Ti
0.0 /10
0 User Reviews
Features
Value for Money
10.0 /10
2 votes0003
reviews yet not
Games
8.5 /10
2 Votes
Reviews are not
7.5 /10
2 votes 9000
Fan noise
5.5 /10
2 Votes
003
No reviews yet
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1020MHz
915MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.turbo GPU
1085MHz
980MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel speed
16.3GPixel/s
25.6 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
1.31 TFLOPS
2.46 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
40.8 GTexels/s
102 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1350MHz
1502MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
5400MHz
6008MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
86.4GB/s
144GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
128bit
192bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5. GDDR memory versions
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory debug code
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✖Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✔Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.GPU Temperature at Boot
Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✖Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✔Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✖Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
✔Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti)
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices such as game consoles and TVs at the same time.
HDMI version 3
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti)
New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.
Price match
Cancel
Which graphic cards are better?
Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti which is better?
General information | |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
54%
17.5% (47.9%) better than |
36. 5% |
Architecture |
|
Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename |
|
GM107 | GK104 |
Type |
|
Desktop | Desktop |
Release price |
|
$149
-150 $ (-50.2%) better than |
$299 |
Number of shaders |
|
640 | 1344
704 (110%) better than |
Core clock |
|
1020MHz
105 MHz (11.5%) better than |
915 MHz |
Boost frequency |
|
1085 MHz
105 MHz (10.7%) better than |
980 MHz |
Number of transistors |
|
1.870 million | 3.540 million |
Process |
|
28 nm | 28 nm |
Interface |
|
PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power indicates the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
60 W
-90 W (-60%) better than |
150 W |
Length |
|
14.5 cm | 24.1 cm |
Additional power connectors |
|
no | 2x 6-pin |
G-SYNC support NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
SLI support |
|
n/a | + |
3D Vision |
|
+ | + |
GPU Boost |
|
+ | + |
GeForce Experience |
|
+ | no data |
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
Multi-monitor support |
|
4 | 4 |
Decred / DCR (Decred) |
|
0.51 Gh/s | no data |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) |
|
1 Sol/s | n/a |
Bus |
|
PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
640 | 1344
704 (110%) better than |
Height |
|
11.1 cm | 11.1 cm |
HDCP |
|
+ | + |
Maximum resolution via VGA |
|
2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
Audio input for HDMI |
|
internal | internal |
HDMI |
|
Blu Ray 3D |
|
+ | no data |
3D Gaming |
|
+ | + |
3D Vision Live |
|
+ | no data |
FXAA |
|
TXAA |
|
Adaptive VSync |
|
+ | + |
3D Blu-ray |
|
n/a | + |
Video connectors |
|
1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DirectX |
|
12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Floating point performance |
|
1. 389 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
2.3 Mh/s | no data |
Memory | |
Memory type |
|
GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games. |
|
128bit | 192 bit
64 bit (50%) better than |
Shared memory |
|
— | — |
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
5.4MHz | 6 MHz
0.6 MHz (11.1%) better than |
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
86.4
Average: 938 MHz 1020MHz max 2457 Average: 938 MHz GPU memory frequency This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth 1502MHz max 16000 Average: 1326.6 MHz 1350MHz max 16000 Average: 1326.6 MHz FLOPS A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS. 2.42TFLOPS max 1142.32 Average: 92.5 TFLOPS 1.4TFLOPS max 1142.32 Average: 92.5 TFLOPS Turbo GPU If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance. 980MHz max 2903 Average: 1375.8 MHz 1085MHz max 2903 Average: 1375.8 MHz Texture size A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second. 102 GTexels/s max 756. 8 Average: 145.4 GTexels/s 40.8 GTexels/s max 2656 Average: 198.3 GB/s 86.4GB/s max 2656 Average: 198.3 GB/s Effective memory speed The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better. 6008MHz max 19500 Average: 6984.5 MHz 5400MHz max 19500 Average: 6984.5 MHz RAM 2GB max 128 Average: 4. 6 GB 2GB max 128 Average: 4.6 GB GDDR Memory Versions Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance 5 Average: 4.5 5 Average: 4.5 Memory bus width A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card. 192bit max 8192 Average: 290.1bit 128bit max 8192 Average: 290. 1bit Date of Release 2012-08-16 00:00:00 2014-02-18 00:00 Heat release (TDP) Requirements for heat car (TDP)-the maximum possible amount energy dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed. 150W Average: 140.4W 60W Average: 140.4W Process technology The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip. 28 nm Average: 47.5 nm 28 nm Average: 47.5 nm Number of transistors The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates 3540 million max 80000 Average: 5043 million 1870 million max 80000 Average: 5043 million PCIe version Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance. 3 Mean: 2.8 3 Mean: 2.8 Width 241mm max 421.7 Average: 242.6mm 145mm max 421.7 Average: 242.6mm Height 111mm max 180 Average: 119.1mm 111mm max 180 Average: 119.1mm Purpose Desktop Desktop DirectX Used in demanding games, providing improved graphics eleven max 12. 2 Average: 11.1 12 max 12.2 Average: 11.1 OpenCL version Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be 1.1 max 4.6 Average: 1.7 3 max 4.6 Average: 1.7 opengl version Later versions provide better game graphics 4.3 max 4.6 Average: 4 4.6 max 4. 6 Average: 4 Shader model version 5.1 max 6.6 Average: 5.5 5.1 max 6.6 Average: 5.5 version VULKAN 1.1 1.3 version CUDA is 5 HDMI Output HDMI Availability HDMI allows you to connect devices with ports of HDMI or Mini-HDMI. They can transmit video and audio to the display. Yes Yes DisplayPort Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort one Average: 2 Average: 2 DVI outputs Allows connection to a display using DVI 2 Mean: 1. 4 2 Mean: 1.4 HDMI Yes Yes Passmark score 4281 max 29325 Average: 7628.6 3852 max 29325 Average: 7628.6 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score 37003 max 1
Average: 80042.3 30722 max 1
Average: 80042.3 3DMark Fire Strike Score 4639 max 38276 Average: 12463 3942 max 38276 Average: 12463 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score 5323 max 49575 Average: 11859. 1 4208 max 49575 Average: 11859.one 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score 8247 max 57937 Average: 18799.9 5270 max 57937 Average: 18799.9 3DMark Vantage Performance score 23251 max 97887 Average: 37830.6 21176 max 97887 Average: 37830.6 Unigine Heaven 3.0 score 77 max 60072 Average: 2402 53 max 60072 Average: 2402 Unigine Heaven 4. |