Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti: comparisions
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Rating: 16 points
WINNER
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060
Rating: 27 points
Performance
Memory
General information
Functions
Benchmark tests
Top specs and features
- Passmark test score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark score
- 3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
Passmark test score
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti: 3852
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060: 10047
3DMark Fire Strike Score
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti: 3942
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060: 10818
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark score
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti: 4208
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060: 12560
3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti: 21176
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060: 42843
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti: 30722
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060: 74947
Description
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti video card is based on the Maxwell architecture. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 on the Pascal architecture. The first has 1870 million transistors. The second is 4400 million. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a transistor size of 28 nm versus 16.
The base clock speed of the first video card is 1020 MHz versus 1506 MHz for the second.
Let’s move on to memory. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 has 2 GB installed. The bandwidth of the first video card is 86.4 Gb/s versus 192.2 Gb/s of the second.
FLOPS of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 1.4. At Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 3.74.
Goes to tests in benchmarks. In the Passmark benchmark, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti scored 3852 points. And here is the second card 10047 points. In 3DMark, the first model scored 4208 points. Second 12560 points.
In terms of interfaces. The first video card is connected using PCIe 3.0 x16. The second is PCIe 3.0 x16. Video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has Directx version 12. The OpenGL version is 4.6. Video card Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 — Directx version — 12.
The OpenGL version is 4.5.
Regarding cooling, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 60W heat dissipation requirements versus 120W for Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060.
Why Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 is better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060: highlights
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060
GPU base clock speed
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1020 MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
1506 MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
Gpu memory speed
This is an important aspect for calculating memory bandwidth.
1350 MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
2002 MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
FLOPS
Measuring the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
1.4 TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
3.74 TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
RAM
2 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
6 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
Turbo gpu
If the GPU speed has dropped below its limit, then to improve performance, it can go to a high clock speed.
1085 MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
1746 MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
40.8 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
120.5 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Maxwell
Pascal
GPU
GM107
GP106
Shared memory
Not available
Not available
Memory bandwidth
This is the rate at which the device stores or reads information.
86.4 GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
192.2 GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock is calculated from the size and transfer rate of the memory information.
The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show more
5400 MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
8008 MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
2 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
6 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR memory versions
Latest versions of GDDR memory provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
5
Average: 4.9
5
Average: 4.
9
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects memory performance as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show more
128 bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9 bit
192 bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9 bit
Power Consumption (TDP)
Heat Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum possible amount of energy dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed
Show more
60 W
Average: 160 W
120 W
Average: 160 W
Technological process
The small size of the semiconductors means this is a new generation chip.
28 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
16 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power this indicates.
1870 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
4400 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
PCIe connection interface
A considerable speed of the expansion card used to connect the computer to the peripherals is provided. The updated versions offer impressive bandwidth and high performance.
Show more
3
Average: 3
3
Average: 3
Width
145 mm
max 421.
7
Average: 192.1 mm
278 mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1 mm
Height
111 mm
max 619
Average: 89.6 mm
114 mm
max 619
Average: 89.6 mm
Appointment
Desktop
There is no data
Sales start date
2014-02-18 00:00:00
There is no data
Price at the time of release
149 $
max 419999
Average: 5679.5 $
$
max 419999
Average: 5679.5 $
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing improved graphics
12
max 12.
2
Average: 11.4
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.4
OpenGL
Used by some applications to harness the power of the GPU for non-graphical computations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
3
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
OpenGL
Later versions provide high quality gaming graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.
2
Shader model
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5
6.1
Has hdmi output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can send video and audio to the display.
Available
Available
DVI Outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI
2
Average: 1.4
1
Average: 1.4
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
HDMI
Available
Available
Passmark test score
3852
max 29325
Average: 7628.
6
10047
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
30722
max 191204
Average: 80042.3
74947
max 191204
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3942
max 38276
Average: 12463
10818
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark score
4208
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
12560
max 49575
Average: 11859.
1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU Benchmark
5270
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
16942
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark
21176
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
42843
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
Unigine Heaven 3.0 test score
53
max 60072
Average: 2402
8909
max 60072
Average: 2402
Unigine Heaven 4.0 test score
530
max 4818
Average: 1291.
1
max 4818
Average: 1291.1
Octane Render OctaneBench test score
34
max 125
Average: 47.1
max 125
Average: 47.1
FAQ
How does the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti processor perform in benchmarks?
Passmark NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti scored 3852 points. The second video card scored 10047 points in Passmark.
What FLOPS do video cards have?
FLOPS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 1.4 TFLOPS. But the second video card has FLOPS equal to 3.74 TFLOPS.
What power consumption?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 60 Watt. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 120 Watt.
How fast are NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti operates at 1020 MHz. In this case, the maximum frequency reaches 1085 MHz.
The clock base frequency of Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 reaches 1506 MHz. In turbo mode it reaches 1746 MHz.
What kind of memory do graphics cards have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti supports GDDR5. Installed 2 GB of RAM. Throughput reaches 86.4 GB/s. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 works with GDDR5. The second one has 6 GB of RAM installed. Its bandwidth is 86.4 GB/s.
How many HDMI connectors do they have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has There is no data HDMI outputs. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 is equipped with 1 HDMI outputs.
What power connectors are used?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses There is no data. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 is equipped with There is no data HDMI outputs.
What architecture are video cards based on?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 uses the Pascal architecture.
What graphics processor is being used?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is equipped with GM107. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 is set to GP106.
How many PCIe lanes
The first graphics card has There is no data PCIe lanes. And the PCIe version is 3. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 There is no data PCIe lanes. PCIe version 3.
How many transistors?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 1870 million transistors. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 has 4400 million transistors
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
AMD Radeon 550X
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
MSI GeForce GTX 970
VS
MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 G1 Gaming
VS
MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming LE
EVGA GeForce GTX 550 Ti 2GB
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Galax GeForce GTX 1070 Ti EX
VS
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X
AMD Radeon RX 470
VS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 OC 2GB
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
VS
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
NVIDIA Quadro 600
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VS
XFX Radeon HD 7850 1GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
VS
Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Super Mini
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 410
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Gainward GeForce GTX 760
VS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
VS
Sapphire Radeon RX 460
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
NVIDIA Quadro K600
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K6000
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
VS
Nvidia Tesla K20
AMD Radeon RX 460
VS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950 CN
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 3.
1x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s - 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 1601.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 10067 vs 3899
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 760 vs 505
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 31204 vs 11251
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 42.463
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 642.715
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 2.933
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.
799 vs 133.458 - 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 4843
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 4843
- 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 4178 vs 1270
| Launch date | 19 July 2016 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 5. 4 GB/s |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 10067 vs 3899 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 760 vs 505 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 31204 vs 11251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 vs 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 vs 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 vs 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 vs 133. 458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 4178 vs 1270 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 21.766
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 21.766 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 10067 | 3899 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 760 | 505 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 31204 | 11251 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
119.148 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3691 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 4178 | 1270 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP106 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 19 July 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $149 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 623 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $299. 01 |
|
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 136. 7 GTexel / s |
43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini… |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.
|