Nvidia GTX 750-Ti vs 950
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
▲
5820,071
▼
BUY • $100
Release date: Q3 2015.
950
960
NVIDIA vs AMD BOTTLENECK
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 412,918 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
119,522 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 29% EVGA(3842 2956) 2GB
Worst Bench: 23% MSI(1462 8C92)
Poor: 23%
Great: 29%
SPEED RANK: 160th / 688
293,396 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 20% EVGA(3842 3757)
Worst Bench: 17% Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
Poor: 17%
Great: 20%
SPEED RANK: 201st / 688
| Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
26 % | Much faster effective speed. +43% |
18.2 % |
| Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
32.1 fps | Much better lighting effects. +49% |
21.6 fps | |||
| Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
38.2 fps | Hugely better reflection handling. +101% |
19 fps | |||
| MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
34.6 fps | Much faster multi rendering. +37% |
25.2 fps | |||
| Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
31.8 fps | Much faster NBody calculation. +36% |
23.3 fps |
| Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
36.4 fps | Much better peak lighting effects. +49% |
24.4 fps | |||
| Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
47.7 fps | Hugely better peak reflection handling. +89% |
25.3 fps | |||
| MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
36.3 fps | Much faster peak multi rendering. +33% |
27.2 fps | |||
| Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
35 fps | Much faster peak NBody calculation. +36% |
25.8 fps |
| CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
122 Fps | Better CSGO Fps. +11% |
110 Fps | |||
| Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
50 Fps | Slightly Better Fortnite Fps. +9% |
45 Fps | |||
| GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
38 Fps | Slightly Better GTAV Fps. +7% |
36 Fps | |||
| LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
119 Fps | Slightly Better LoL Fps. +9% |
109 Fps | |||
| Overwatch Avg.  Fps @ 1080p on Max
|
69 Fps | Much Better Overwatch Fps. +35% |
51 Fps | |||
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
33 Fps | Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +34% |
25 Fps | |||
| Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
133 Fps | +4% | 128 Fps | |||
| DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
84 Fps | Much Better DOTA 2 Fps. +56% |
54 Fps | |||
| WoW Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
45 Fps | 46 Fps | +2% | |||
| WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
66 Fps | Much Better WoT Fps. +44% |
46 Fps |
Market Share
Based on 55,916,855 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.2 % | 0.48 % | Hugely higher market share. +140% |
|||
| Value Value For Money |
61.5 % | Better value. +11% |
55.4 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
58 % | 62 % | Slightly more popular. +7% |
|||
| Price Price (score) |
$100 | $78 | Cheaper. +22% |
| Age Newest |
86 Months | More recent. +17% |
104 Months | |||
| Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
33.5 fps | Much better peak texture detail. +44% |
23.3 fps | |||
| Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
31.2 fps | Much faster peak complex splatting. +65% |
18.9 fps | |||
| Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
30.4 fps | Much better texture detail. +44% |
21.1 fps | |||
| Splatting Avg.  Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
|
27.4 fps | Much faster complex splatting. +65% |
16.6 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
The GTX 950 is Nvidia’s latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia’s energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it’s also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn’t offer improved value for money.
Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here. [Aug ’15 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- Asus G11CD (439)
- bin bin (358)
- Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (352)
- Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (276)
- Acer Predator G3-710 (275)
- Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (257)
- Asus M5A97 R2.0 (219)
- bin bin (1,194)
- Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (676)
- Asus H81M-K (604)
- Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (572)
- MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) (569)
- Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (558)
- Asus B85M-G (537)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
|
|
|
|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 640 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,2 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Graphics card | Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2014 | Q3 2015 | ||||||
| Model number | GM107-400-A2 | GM206-250-A1 | ||||||
| GPU name | GM107 | GM206 | ||||||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2. 0 |
||||||
| Generation | GeForce 700 | GeForce 900 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1.870.000.000 | 2.940.000.000 | ||||||
| Bus interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 1,02 GHz | 1,02 GHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1,09 GHz | 1,19 GHz | ||||||
| Memory frequency | 1.350 MHz | 1.653 MHz | ||||||
| Effective memory speed | 5,4 GB/s | 6,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Memory size | 2 GB | 2 GB | ||||||
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | ||||||
| Memory bus | 128 Bit | 128 Bit | ||||||
| Memory bandwidth | 86,4 GB/s | 105,8 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 60 W | 90 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 300W ATX Power Supply | 350W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| Multicard technology | — | 2-way SLI | ||||||
| Outputs |
2x DVI |
1x DVI |
||||||
| Maximum GPU Temperature | 95°C | 95°C | ||||||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 5 | 6 | ||||||
| Shading units (cuda cores) | 640 | 768 | ||||||
| TMUs | 40 | 48 | ||||||
| ROPs | 16 | 32 | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
| Pixel fillrate | 17,4 GP/s | 38,0 GP/s | ||||||
| Texture fillrate | 43,4 GT/s | 57,0 GT/s | ||||||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 1,4 TFLOPS | 1,8 TFLOPS | ||||||
| Performance FP64 (double) | 43,4 GFLOPS | 57,0 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 |
1.825 |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
1.389 |
The difference is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
See also:
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 (OEM)Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M
Equivalence:
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 950 AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.