Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti: What is the difference?
37points
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
41points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
EVGAEVGA Superclocked
vs
54 facts in comparison
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Why is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
- 0.58 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
1.89 TFLOPSvs1.31 TFLOPS - 23 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
39.3 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s - 303MHz faster memory clock speed?
1653MHzvs1350MHz - 1212MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
6612MHzvs5400MHz - 18.14 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
58.94 GTexels/svs40.8 GTexels/s - 0.8 newer version of DirectX?
12vs11.2 - 19.4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
105.8GB/svs86.4GB/s
- 128 more shading units?
768vs640
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950?
- 30W lower TDP?
60Wvs90W - 36mm narrower?
145mmvs181mm - 8mm shorter?
111mmvs119mm
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX110
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
XFX HD 6950 XXX 1GB
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Super Gaming X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
XFX Radeon RX 550 2GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
1 User reviews
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
8. 0/10
1 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
10.0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
7.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Performance
8.0/10
1 votes
7.5/10
2 votes
Fan noise
10.0/10
1 votes
5.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1026MHz
1020MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1190MHz
1085MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3. pixel rate
39.3 GPixel/s
16.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
1.89 TFLOPS
1.31 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
58.94 GTexels/s
40.8 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1653MHz
1350MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
6612MHz
5400MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
105.8GB/s
86.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
128bit
128bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
HDMI 2.0
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
Asus GeForce GTX 950 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti: What is the difference?
35points
Asus GeForce GTX 950
41points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
EVGAEVGA Superclocked
vs
54 facts in comparison
Asus GeForce GTX 950
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Why is Asus GeForce GTX 950 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
- 0.
27 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
1.58 TFLOPSvs1.31 TFLOPS - 16.5 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
32.8 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s - 303MHz faster memory clock speed?
1653MHzvs1350MHz - 1212MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
6612MHzvs5400MHz - 8.4 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
49.2 GTexels/svs40.8 GTexels/s - 0.8 newer version of DirectX?
12vs11.2 - 19.4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
105.8GB/svs86.4GB/s - 128 more shading units?
768vs640
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Asus GeForce GTX 950?
- 30W lower TDP?
60Wvs90W - Supports 3D?
- 1 more DVI outputs?
2vs1 - 65.8mm narrower?
145mmvs210.8mm
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
XFX HD 6950 XXX 1GB
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX130
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX450 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Asus GeForce GTX 950
0 User reviews
Asus GeForce GTX 950
0. 0/10
0 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
10.0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
10.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
No reviews yet
8.5/10
2 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
7.5/10
2 votes
Fan noise
No reviews yet
5.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1026MHz
1020MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1190MHz
1085MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.pixel rate
32. 8 GPixel/s
16.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
1.58 TFLOPS
1.31 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
49.2 GTexels/s
40.8 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1653MHz
1350MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
6612MHz
5400MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
105.8GB/s
86.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
128bit
128bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Asus GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 950)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 950)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔Asus GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
HDMI 2.0
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950 Graphics cards Comparison
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 950, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 750 Ti stacks up against GeForce GTX 950, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Check Price
GeForce GTX 950
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 950 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 90 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.![]() |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pins |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 950 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 950 are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950 is 4 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 950 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 950 is 2 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 950 is 1 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.![]() |
||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 950 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.![]() |
||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 950 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.![]() |
||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.![]() |
||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.![]() |
||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.![]() |
||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.![]() |
||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.![]() |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 950 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM206 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 18 February 2014 | 20 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.![]() |
49.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,825 gflops |
Length | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) | 7.938″ (20.2 cm) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 6.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 105.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.![]() |
1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.25 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 640 | 768 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | 4 displays |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
3D Gaming | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
3D Vision Live | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 183 Mh/s | 233 Mh/s |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 0.![]() |
|
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.3 Mh/s | 9.97 Mh/s |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 74.4 Sol/s | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Blu Ray 3D | + | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX 560X mobile
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 560X mobile
- GeForce GTX 950 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
100%
-
GeForce GTX 950
151%
Relative performance
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
100%
-
GeForce GTX 950
122%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 950 |
22% higher gaming performance.![]() |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (4 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | GM107 (GM107-400-A2) | vs | GM206 (GM206-250-A1) | |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm | |
Die Size | 148 mm² | vs | 228 mm² | |
Transistors | 1,870 million | vs | 2,940 million | |
Shaders | 640 | vs | 768 | |
Compute Units | 5 | vs | 6 | |
Core clock | 1020 MHz | vs | 1024 MHz | |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 32 | |
TMUs | 40 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit | |
Memory Speed | 1350 MHz 5400 MHz effective |
vs | 1653 MHz 6612 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 60 watts | vs | 90 watts | |
Release Date | 18 Feb 2014 | vs | 20 Aug 2015 |
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
16.
32 GP/s
-
GeForce GTX 950
32.80 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
40.80 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 950
49.20 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
86.40 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 950
105.80 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1305.60 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 950
1572.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5610
-
GeForce GTX 950
8490
Points (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
30
-
GeForce GTX 950
41
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
23
-
GeForce GTX 950
31
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
-
GeForce GTX 950
31
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
34
-
GeForce GTX 950
45
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon Vega 8 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 560 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 460 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | GeForce GTX 1050 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
GTX 950 vs GTX 750 Ti: veja o comparativo de especificações das placas | Placas
Publicidade
Inferior tecnicamente, 750 Ti pode ser solução para quem quer economizar. Confira no confronto qual placa vale mais a pena.
Por Filipe Garrett, para o TechTudo
Direcionadas ao mercado de entrada, as Geforce GTX 750 Ti e GTX 950 são placas de vídeo da Nvidia que já têm alguns anos de mercado, mas ainda são encontradas à venda. No caso da 750 Ti, os três anos de vida reduziram um pouco o preço a ponto de torná-la alternativa interessante para quem precisa de placa de vídeo barata, sacrificando performance bruta. A GTX 950, mais rápida, pode servir para quem quer rodar games em Full HD, tendo uma placa com fôlego para acompanhar os lançamentos da indústria de jogos ainda por algum tempo. Abaixo, você compara melhor as diferenças entre as placas para saber o que é melhor para você.
Colocamos lado a lado especificações, desempenho para jogos, consumo, preço e custo-benefício dos dois modelos. Afinal, vale a pena investir em alguma das placas? Confira no comparativo das Geforces GTX 750 Ti e GTX 950.
Vale a pena comprar uma GTX 950? Veja os prós e contras da placa de vídeo
Geforce 950 tem especificações técnicas muito superiores — Foto: Divulgação/Asus
Especificações
A GTX 950 tem vantagem em termos de ficha técnica. Mais recente, a placa conta com processador mais rápido, operando entre 1. 024 e 1.188 MHz, contra a faixa um pouco mais baixa da 750 Ti, que fica em 1.020 e 1.085 MHz. A diferença de velocidade não é tão grande, mas a contagem de núcleos do processador gráfico (GPU) dá clara vantagem à 950: são 768 núcleos CUDA contra 640 na GTX 750 Ti.
Os núcleos Cuda de uma placa de vídeo da Nvidia são equivalentes aos núcleos de um processador de PC ou celular. Contados às vezes na casa dos milhares, esses são os componentes responsáveis por processar o grande volume de dados associado a tarefas intensas do ponto de vista gráfico. Quanto mais, portanto, melhor.
Em termos de memória RAM, a 950 também sai na frente. Ambas usam 2 GB de GDDR5 ligados ao processador por meio de interface de 128 bits. Entretanto, na GTX 950 a memória roda a 6,6 Gbps (gigabits por segundo) contra 5,4 Gbps de velocidade de RAM na 750 Ti.
Por fim, outro aspecto técnico que coloca a 950 em vantagem diz respeito à largura da banda pela qual os dados são trocados entre GPU e memória. Na Geforce GTX 950, essa via suporta um máximo de 105,6 GB/s, enquanto que na 750 Ti a velocidade fica em 86 GB/s.
Desempenho
GeForce GTX 750 Ti tem performance inferior — Foto: Divulgação/Gigabyte
Como você pode perceber, todos os referenciais técnicos mais importantes são melhores na GTX 950. Diante disso, é natural que a placa seja mais rápida que a 750 Ti.
Sites que organizam dados de benchmarks realizados no mundo todo mostram que a GTX 950 tem desempenho que pode chegar a ser 30% superior ao da 750 Ti, dependendo do restante do sistema e tipo de aplicação em que a métrica é obtida.
Na prática, isso significa que, das duas, a GTX 950 é melhor para jogos. Mais veloz e com RAM mais ágil, a placa terá mais fôlego para acompanhar lançamentos e permitir configurações de maior fidelidade gráfica.
Consumo
Baixa geração de calor torna a 750 Ti silenciosa e ideal para HTPCs — Foto: Divulgação/Nvidia
A GTX 750 Ti tem uma vantagem no consumo. De acordo com a Nvidia, esse modelo dissipa apenas 60 watts de energia, contra 95 da rival. O valor de dissipação térmica, também conhecido como TDP, classifica a quantidade de energia elétrica que a placa libera na forma de calor enquanto funciona. Como essa eletricidade está sendo desperdiçada (não está sendo convertida em informação gráfica), entende-se a TDP como uma noção de eficiência, que verifica a medida de eletricidade que a placa não aproveita durante o uso.
No resumo, a 750 Ti desperdiça um máximo de 60 watts durante uso sob alta demanda. A 950 vai a 95 watts. Nos números, portanto, a 750 Ti tende a gastar menos energia. Quanto menor o valor em watts associado à TDP, mais econômica é a placa e menor é a quantidade de calor que ela produz durante seu funcionamento. Isso significa também que uma placa com TDP menor vai depender de sistemas de refrigeração menos agressivos e mais silenciosos.
Pelos números, a 750 Ti consome bem menos, mas como também tem performance inferior, essa vantagem acaba sendo diluída, já que o preço do consumo menor acaba sendo a performance mais baixa. Entretanto, esse perfil torna a placa da Nvidia opção válida para quem deseja um computador de boa performance gráfica, mas que seja compacto e silencioso.
Preço e disponibilidade
GTX 950 tem preço salgado no momento, inclusive superior ao da GTX 1050 — Foto: Divulgação/Asus
Lançada em fevereiro de 2014, a Geforce GTX 750 Ti ainda é encontrada no mercado por preços na casa dos R$ 480 (no lançamento, a placa era vendida a R$ 599). Do outro lado, mais recente, a GTX 950 tem preços muito mais salgados, chegando aos R$ 930 para as unidades que ainda resistem nas prateleiras.
Custo-benefício
Na prática, não há muita razão para comprar a GTX 750 Ti atualmente. A GTX 1050, por exemplo, é muito superior a ambas e é vendida a preços na faixa dos R$ 530.
Numa perspectiva de economia acima de tudo, a GTX 750 Ti pode ser interessante, caso o consumidor consiga arrancar bons descontos. Entretanto, a valores atuais tão próximos da GTX 1050, fica difícil justificar o investimento no modelo.
Com relação à GTX 950, o preço inchado da placa atualmente é uma distorção. Embora seja superior à 750 Ti, a placa está posicionada numa faixa de valor que é frequentada por modelos muito mais rápidos e superiores.
Geforce GTX 750 Ti vs. Geforce GTX 950
Especificações | Geforce GTX 750 Ti | Geforce GTX 950 |
Lançamento | Fevereiro de 2014 | Julho de 2015 |
Preço | R$ 490 | R$ 930 |
Clock | 1.![]() |
1.024 a 1.188 MHz |
Núcleos CUDA | 640 | 768 |
Memória RAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 |
Velocidade da memória | 5,4 Gbps | 6,6 Gbps |
Interface | 128 bits | 128 bits |
Largura de banda | 105,6 GB/s | 85,4 GB/s |
TDP | 60 watts | 95 watts |
Crypto coins mining profit calculator compared to Ethereum Classic
Prefer websites without ads? Support WTM by subscribing for $5 per 3 months.
Using Fast Timings with 0.7-0.9V, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
6900XT
Using Fast Timings with 0.7-0.9V, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
6800XT
Using Fast Timings with 0.7-0.9V, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
6800
Using Fast Timings with 0.7-0.9V, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
6700XT
Using Fast Timings with 0.7-0.9V, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
6600XT
Using 1750/1000 with 0.95V<br>For Ethash, BEAM, ProgPow, NeoScrypt and Verthash 1500/1000 with 0.88V<br>For KawPow 1100/1000 with 0.825V» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
VII
Using 1300/915 with 0.78V and ETH bios mod<br>For BEAM and GRIN algos 1550/915 with 0.85V» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
5700XT
Using 1300/915 with 0.78V and ETH bios mod<br>For BEAM and GRIN algos 1550/915 with 0.85V» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
5700
Using 1100/900 with 0.78V<br>For BEAM and GRIN algos 1300/900 with 0.85V» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
5600XT
Using 950/1020 with 0.85V<br>For BEAM 1200/1020 with 0. 87V<br>For CryptoNight and GRIN algos 1570/1020″ data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
Vega64
Using 950/900 with 0.85V<br>For BEAM 1200/900 with 0.87V<br>For CryptoNight and GRIN algos 1480/900″ data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
Vega56
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3090Ti
Using +100/+0 with 80-90% TDP<br>For Ethash -100/+500 with 90% TDP<br><br>Some models suffer from memory throttling which severly reduces hashrate for algos like ETH.» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
3090
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified<br><br>Some models suffer from memory throttling which severly reduces hashrate for algos like ETH.» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3080Ti
Using +100/+500 with 65% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+500 with 60% TDP<br><br>Some models suffer from memory throttling which severly reduces hashrate for algos like ETH.» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3080
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3080L
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
3070Ti
Using +100/+500 with 70% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+800 with 50% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3070
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3070L
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3060Ti
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3060TiL
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified<br>Ethash limited» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
3060
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
3060L
Using Fast Timings with 0.7-0.9V, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
6600
Using 0.78V, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
5500XT
Using 1150/2150 with 0.1V undervolt and ETH bios mod» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
580
Using 1100/2000 with 0. 1V undervolt and ETH bios mod» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
570
Using 1150/2150 with 0.1V undervolt and ETH bios mod» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
480
Using 1050/1870 with 0.1V undervolt and ETH bios mod» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
470
Using 1020/500 with 0.1V undervolt» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
Fury
Using 1000/1500 with 0. 1V undervolt» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
380
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
A5000
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
A4500
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
A4000
Using 60-80% TDP, unverified» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
A2000
Using +100/+200 with 75% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+500 with 60% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
2080Ti
Using +100/+200 with 75% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+500 with 60% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
2080
Using +100/+200 with 75% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+500 with 70% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
2070
Using +100/+200 with 70% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+500 with 65% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
2060
Using +100/+500 with 65% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+500 with 65% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
1660S
Using +100/+500 with 75% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+500 with 60% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
1660Ti
Using +100/+250 with 70% TDP<br>For Ethash +0/+250 with 60% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
1660
Using +125/+500 with 75% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
1080Ti
Using +125/+500 with 70% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
1080
Using +150/+500 with 75% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
1070Ti
Using +150/+500 with 75% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
1070
Using +150/+500 with 65% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > .container»>
1060
Using +150/+500 with 75% TDP» data-bs-placement=»bottom» data-bs-trigger=»hover» data-bs-html=»true» data-bs-container=»body» data-boundary-selector=»body > . container»>
1050Ti
custom
Partner
SimpleMining.net: Monitor and configure your GPU mining farm in one place.
Ethash
Mh/s
W
Ethash5G
Mh/s
W
Zhash
h/s
W
CNHeavy
h/s
W
CNGPU
h/s
W
CNFast
h/s
W
Cortex
h/s
W
Aion
h/s
W
CuckooCycle
h/s
W
Cuckaroo(d)29
h/s
W
kHeavyHash
Mh/s
W
Cuckatoo32
h/s
W
Beam
h/s
W
RandomX
h/s
W
NeoScrypt
kh/s
W
Autolykos
Mh/s
W
Octopus
Mh/s
W
EquihashZero
h/s
W
ZelHash
h/s
W
KawPow
Mh/s
W
ProgPow
Mh/s
W
X25X
Mh/s
W
FiroPow
Mh/s
W
Verthash
Mh/s
W
Cost
$/kWh
Sort by
DifficultyNetHashEstimated RewardsEstimated Rewards 24Market CapExchange VolumeCurrent RevenueCurrent ProfitProfit 24hProfitability 24hProfitability 3 daysProfitability 7 days
Volume filter
Any volumeVolume > 0. 1Volume > 0.5Volume > 1Volume > 5Volume > 10Volume > 50Volume > 100
Averages for revenue $
Current valuesAverage last 1hAverage last 24hAverage last 3 daysAverage last 7 days
Selected exchanges
BinanceBitfinexBitForexBittrexCoinExExmoGate.ioGraviexHitBTCTradeOgrePoloniexStex
Defaults
Using below table, you can check how profitable it is to mine selected altcoins in comparison to ethereum classic. Please note that calculations are based on mean values, therefore your final results may vary. For best results fill all fields with your hash rate and power consumption. Default values are adapted for three 480 cards.
Name(Tag) Algorithm |
Block Time Block Reward Last Block |
Difficulty NetHash |
Est. Rewards Est. Rewards 24h |
Exchange Rate | Market Cap Volume |
Rev. BTC Rev. 24h |
Rev. $ Profit |
Profitability Current | 24h 3 days | 7 days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neoxa(NEOX) |
BT: 1m BR: 4,250. ![]() LB: 188,298 |
37,924.077 2.71 Th/s |
87.9197 91.4654 |
0.00007216 (TradeOgre) (L) -1.6% |
$3,666,974 200.16 LTC |
0.000018 0.000018 |
$0.36 -$0.87 |
133% | 134% 134% | 137% |
Ravencoin(RVN) |
BT: 1m BR: 2,500.00 LB: 2,469,849 |
216,623.066 15.51 Th/s |
9.0543 8.7999 |
0.00000195 (Binance) -0.7% |
$443,837,299 40.50 BTC |
0.000018 0.000017 |
$0.33 -$0.89 |
133% | 126% 130% | 131% |
Nicehash-KawPow |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 2.40 Th/s |
0.000017 0.000017 |
0.![]() (Nicehash) -1.8% |
— 0.99 BTC |
0.000017 0.000017 |
$0.33 -$0.89 |
126% | 125% 134% | 137% |
Ubiq(UBQ) |
BT: 20s BR: 1.50 LB: 2,823,561 |
1,435,121M 71.76 Gh/s |
8.1174 9.5518 |
0.00000169 (Bittrex) 1.0% |
$1,400,293 0.10 BTC |
0.000014 0.000016 |
$0.31 -$0.69 |
104% | 118% 112% | 108% |
Beam(BEAM) |
BT: 1m BR: 40.00 LB: 1,955,705 |
90,847,072 1.51 Mh/s |
1.6805 1.6379 |
0.00000954 (BitForex) -0.0% |
$22,961,716 18.43 BTC |
0.000016 0.000016 |
$0.![]() -$0.70 |
121% | 115% 121% | 124% |
Nicehash-Etchash |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 4.11 Th/s |
0.000013 0.000016 |
0.00014639 (Nicehash) -18.5% |
— 0.78 BTC |
0.000013 0.000016 |
$0.30 -$0.71 |
95% | 114% 130% | 122% |
Nicehash-Ethash |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 4.77 Th/s |
0.000013 0.000015 |
0.15246822 (Nicehash) -14.7% |
— 0.87 BTC |
0.000013 0.000015 |
$0.30 -$0.71 |
99% | 113% 137% | 125% |
Firo(FIRO) |
BT: 2m 45s BR: 1. ![]() LB: 545,181 |
11,766.081 306.27 Gh/s |
0.1104 0.1056 |
0.00014580 (Binance) -1.3% |
$32,726,704 4.24 BTC |
0.000016 0.000015 |
$0.30 -$0.92 |
121% | 113% 108% | 101% |
Nicehash-NeoScrypt |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 1.46 Gh/s |
0.000016 0.000015 |
0.00681685 (Nicehash) 5.4% |
— 0.01 BTC |
0.000016 0.000015 |
$0.30 -$0.78 |
122% | 112% 114% | 118% |
Nicehash-BeamV3 |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 605.64 kh/s |
0.000015 0.000015 |
0.00033633 (Nicehash) -1. |
— 0.20 BTC |
0.000015 0.000015 |
$0.30 -$0.71 |
113% | 111% 121% | 123% |
Sero(SERO) |
BT: 13.11s BR: 5.22 LB: 8,674,105 |
2,050,338M 156.41 Gh/s |
3.4118 3.9583 |
0.00000372 (Gate.io) -2.8% |
$26,696,283 7.47 BTC |
0.000013 0.000015 |
$0.29 -$0.72 |
96% | 108% 107% | 104% |
EthereumPoW(ETHW) |
BT: 13.4s BR: 2.01 LB: 15,615,514 |
618,241G 46.14 Th/s |
0.0253 0.0245 |
0.00057931 (Gate.io) 6.6% |
$1,379,376,470 630.20 BTC |
0.000015 0.000014 |
$0.![]() -$0.73 |
111% | 104% 125% | 154% |
Kaspa(KAS) |
BT: 1.0s BR: 349.23 LB: 27,789,794 |
62,034.625 267.16 Th/s |
53.2546 57.9774 |
0.00000024 (TradeOgre) 8.4% |
$59,969,047 2.01 BTC |
0.000013 0.000014 |
$0.27 -$0.74 |
96% | 101% 108% | 112% |
EthereumClassic(ETC) |
BT: 13.15s BR: 2.48 LB: 16,023,096 |
2,145,570,922M 163.11 Th/s |
0.0090 0.0093 |
0.00147200 (Binance) -0.7% |
$3,923,670,362 197.77 BTC |
0.000013 0.000014 |
$0.27 -$0.74 |
100% | 100% 100% | 100% |
Trezarcoin(TZC) |
BT: 1m BR: 50. ![]() LB: 2,535,451 |
1.569 112.31 Mh/s |
1,543.2277 1,237.7411 |
0.00000001 (Graviex) 0.0% |
$58,773 0.00 BTC |
0.000017 0.000014 |
$0.26 -$0.82 |
128% | 100% 101% | 100% |
Callisto(CLO) |
BT: 12.7s BR: 38.93 LB: 10,800,601 |
6,594,313M 519.44 Gh/s |
45.9006 47.8766 |
0.00000028 (Bitfinex) 5.4% |
$17,050,172 9.04 BTC |
0.000013 0.000014 |
$0.26 -$0.75 |
98% | 99% 112% | 145% |
Vertcoin(VTC) |
BT: 2m 33s BR: 12.50 LB: 1,848,111 |
217.577 6.11 Gh/s |
1.4490 1. ![]() |
0.00000945 (Bittrex) -0.8% |
$11,963,169 0.29 BTC |
0.000014 0.000013 |
$0.26 -$0.60 |
103% | 98% 99% | 97% |
Zano(ZANO) |
BT: 2m BR: 1.00 LB: 1,775,549 |
3,388,722M 28.24 Gh/s |
0.6465 0.6586 |
0.00001980 (Stex) 0.3% |
$5,154,638 2.62 BTC |
0.000013 0.000013 |
$0.25 -$0.75 |
97% | 96% 105% | 105% |
Cortex(CTXC) |
BT: 13.34s BR: 7.00 LB: 7,015,462 |
855,834.000 64.17 kh/s |
2.0987 2.2296 |
0.00000566 (Binance) -1.5% |
$22,167,577 6.86 BTC |
0.000012 0. ![]() |
$0.25 -$0.62 |
90% | 93% 92% | 95% |
HavenProtocol(XHV) |
BT: 2m BR: 3.40 LB: 1,197,869 |
1,403,587,442 11.70 Mh/s |
0.6031 0.5597 |
0.00002218 (TradeOgre) -0.2% |
$12,328,869 0.05 BTC |
0.000013 0.000012 |
$0.24 -$0.55 |
101% | 91% 93% | 98% |
Ryo(RYO) |
BT: 4m 11s BR: 39.48 LB: 686,284 |
573,209,257 2.28 Mh/s |
13.5561 12.5408 |
0.00000092 (TradeOgre) 0.5% |
$728,672 0.01 BTC |
0.000012 0.000012 |
$0.22 -$0.64 |
94% | 85% 87% | 90% |
GoByte(GBX) |
BT: 2m 38s BR: 2. ![]() LB: 957,600 |
3.242 88.12 Mh/s |
42.4675 39.4429 |
0.00000028 (Stex) -7.3% |
$52,133 0.00 BTC |
0.000012 0.000011 |
$0.21 -$0.87 |
90% | 81% 87% | 89% |
QuarkChain(QKC) |
BT: 9.57s BR: 2.21 LB: 10,960,768 |
357,144M 74.60 Gh/s |
20.4696 18.4043 |
0.00000060 (Binance) -0.2% |
$74,671,510 110.55 BTC |
0.000012 0.000011 |
$0.21 -$0.79 |
93% | 81% 78% | 66% |
Bloc.money(BLOC) |
BT: 2m 2s BR: 12.63 LB: 1,112,165 |
10,543,805 86.42 kh/s |
288.3621 356. ![]() |
0.00000003 (TradeOgre) 0.0% |
$12,664 0.00 BTC |
0.000009 0.000011 |
$0.21 -$0.58 |
65% | 78% 68% | 62% |
Conceal(CCX) |
BT: 2m BR: 6.00 LB: 1,124,584 |
342,000,000 2.85 Mh/s |
3.4532 3.3060 |
0.00000320 (TradeOgre) -4.0% |
$908,220 0.25 BTC |
0.000011 0.000011 |
$0.21 -$0.66 |
83% | 78% 75% | 76% |
Feathercoin(FTC) |
BT: 1m 2s BR: 20.00 LB: 4,355,744 |
14.131 978.91 Mh/s |
69.8642 49.9114 |
0.00000021 (Bittrex) 0.0% |
$966,194 0.01 BTC |
0.![]() 0.000010 |
$0.20 -$0.88 |
111% | 77% 99% | 95% |
Grin-CT32(GRIN) |
BT: 1m BR: 60.00 LB: 1,937,547 |
772,113 12.87 kh/s |
3.0615 3.2020 |
0.00000325 (Gate.io) 1.2% |
$6,202,829 1.85 BTC |
0.000010 0.000010 |
$0.20 -$0.66 |
75% | 76% 81% | 83% |
Nicehash-ZelHash |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 2.14 Mh/s |
0.000013 0.000010 |
324.10298854 (Nicehash) 28.1% |
— 0.52 BTC |
0.000013 0.000010 |
$0.20 -$0.67 |
99% | 75% 79% | 81% |
Nicehash-CuckooCycle |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 58. |
0.000010 0.000010 |
0.00134246 (Nicehash) -1.5% |
— 0.09 BTC |
0.000010 0.000010 |
$0.20 -$0.74 |
76% | 75% 80% | 82% |
Aeternity(AE) |
BT: 3m 1s BR: 72.17 LB: 662,030 |
19,329,850 106.79 kh/s |
2.5160 2.5677 |
0.00000393 (Gate.io) -1.2% |
$26,788,548 1.54 BTC |
0.000010 0.000010 |
$0.20 -$0.74 |
75% | 74% 80% | 81% |
Swap(XWP) |
BT: 14.81s BR: 0.64 LB: 8,097,809 |
19,136 1.29 kh/s |
20.6235 23.3371 |
0.00000043 (TradeOgre) -0.2% |
$131,869 0. ![]() |
0.000009 0.000010 |
$0.20 -$0.74 |
67% | 74% 80% | 80% |
Flux(FLUX) |
BT: 2m 2s BR: 37.50 LB: 1,217,482 |
86,277.076 5.79 Mh/s |
0.2888 0.2181 |
0.00004525 (Gate.io) 1.2% |
$243,842,330 24.73 BTC |
0.000013 0.000010 |
$0.19 -$0.67 |
99% | 72% 73% | 73% |
Etho(ETHO) |
BT: 13.22s BR: 0.30 LB: 10,112,580 |
329,131M 24.89 Gh/s |
7.0622 7.3626 |
0.00000134 (Stex) 0.0% |
$2,081,941 0.00 BTC |
0.000009 0.000010 |
$0.19 -$0.82 |
71% | 72% 73% | 71% |
Aion(AION) |
BT: 10.![]() BR: 4.50 LB: 13,102,994 |
8,870,806 887.08 kh/s |
5.3695 4.9403 |
0.00000198 (Binance) -1.1% |
$19,309,480 1.85 BTC |
0.000011 0.000010 |
$0.19 -$0.67 |
80% | 72% 74% | 73% |
Nicehash-Cuckatoo32 |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 2.66 kh/s |
0.000010 0.000010 |
0.02069012 (Nicehash) -0.8% |
— 0.04 BTC |
0.000010 0.000010 |
$0.19 -$0.68 |
72% | 70% 76% | 78% |
BitcoinZ(BTCZ) |
BT: 2m 31s BR: 5,937.50 LB: 1,018,525 |
4,854.187 263.35 kh/s |
812.![]() 775.6067 |
0.00000436 (Stex) (L) -4.0% |
$2,735,461 510.37 LTC |
0.000010 0.000009 |
$0.18 -$0.68 |
74% | 69% 72% | 74% |
EtherGem(EGEM) |
BT: 11.92s BR: 0.48 LB: 11,398,262 |
119,579M 10.03 Gh/s |
30.9359 31.6960 |
0.00000029 (Graviex) 3.8% |
$108,735 0.04 BTC |
0.000009 0.000009 |
$0.18 -$0.83 |
67% | 67% 68% | 64% |
BitcoinGold(BTG) |
BT: 9m 42s BR: 6.25 LB: 757,720 |
544,303.026 7.66 Mh/s |
0.0076 0.0077 |
0.00109600 (Binance) -0.3% |
$373,270,838 5.65 BTC |
0.![]() 0.000008 |
$0.16 -$0.70 |
63% | 62% 65% | 65% |
Nicehash-Zhash |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 651.28 kh/s |
0.000007 0.000008 |
0.12096287 (Nicehash) -8.2% |
— 0.13 BTC |
0.000007 0.000008 |
$0.15 -$0.71 |
55% | 58% 62% | 64% |
Gemlink(GLINK) |
BT: 59s BR: 9.00 LB: 2,482,826 |
229.292 31.84 kh/s |
18.7410 20.7718 |
0.00000035 (Stex) 0.7% |
$418,144 0.00 BTC |
0.000007 0.000007 |
$0.14 -$0.72 |
50% | 53% 59% | 59% |
Expanse(EXP) |
BT: 21s BR: 4. ![]() LB: 6,808,174 |
1,738,211M 82.77 Gh/s |
17.8748 17.7970 |
0.00000040 (Bittrex) 1.4% |
$146,273 0.01 BTC |
0.000007 0.000007 |
$0.14 -$0.87 |
54% | 52% 49% | 37% |
BitTubeCash(TUBE) |
BT: 15.3s BR: 7.30 LB: 4,517,233 |
11,520 753.00 h/s |
401.7891 340.7413 |
0.00000002 (TradeOgre) 0.0% |
$138,023 0.01 BTC |
0.000008 0.000007 |
$0.13 -$0.80 |
61% | 50% 55% | 58% |
Dagger(XDAG) |
BT: 1m 4s BR: 64.00 LB: 2,270,069 |
705,512,486 11.02 Mh/s |
11.0498 8. ![]() |
0.00000073 (CoinEx) -3.6% |
$17,011,471 0.16 BTC |
0.000008 0.000006 |
$0.12 -$0.52 |
61% | 47% 48% | 46% |
Equilibria(XEQ) |
BT: 2m 1s BR: 2.33 LB: 925,831 |
293,713,855 2.43 Mh/s |
1.5616 1.8912 |
0.00000335 (TradeOgre) -1.5% |
$0 0.18 BTC |
0.000005 0.000006 |
$0.12 -$0.74 |
39% | 46% 47% | 50% |
Nicehash-Autolykos |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 1.34 Th/s |
0.000006 0.000006 |
0.00003525 (Nicehash) -2.4% |
— 0.05 BTC |
0.000006 0.000006 |
$0.![]() -$0.82 |
45% | 45% 44% | 43% |
Ergo(ERG) |
BT: 9m 39s BR: 48.14 LB: 843,964 |
16,610,580G 28.69 Th/s |
0.0425 0.0425 |
0.00013501 (Gate.io) -2.9% |
$153,955,187 15.77 BTC |
0.000006 0.000006 |
$0.11 -$0.82 |
43% | 42% 38% | 37% |
Masari(MSR) |
BT: 1m BR: 1.43 LB: 2,268,460 |
42,013,933 700.23 kh/s |
14.4596 14.4014 |
0.00000037 (TradeOgre) 0.0% |
$120,349 0.00 BTC |
0.000005 0.000005 |
$0.10 -$0.69 |
40% | 39% 43% | 46% |
Conflux(CFX) |
BT: 0.![]() BR: 1.99 LB: 55,156,649 |
1,564,021M 3.12 Th/s |
1.6179 1.6180 |
0.00000226 (Gate.io) -0.6% |
$91,760,286 10.27 BTC |
0.000004 0.000004 |
$0.07 -$0.79 |
28% | 27% 29% | 30% |
Nicehash-Octopus |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 857.60 Gh/s |
0.000003 0.000003 |
0.00023439 (Nicehash) -1.4% |
— 0.21 BTC |
0.000003 0.000003 |
$0.07 -$0.80 |
25% | 25% 26% | 27% |
Quantum R L(QRL) |
BT: 58s BR: 1.83 LB: 2,247,581 |
937,216,660 16.16 Mh/s |
0.2381 0.2572 |
0.![]() (Bittrex) -0.2% |
$10,785,575 0.01 BTC |
0.000002 0.000002 |
$0.04 -$0.61 |
13% | 14% 15% | 16% |
Sinovate(SIN) |
BT: 59s BR: 12.47 LB: 1,157,116 |
5.409 393.75 Mh/s |
114.7557 92.7771 |
0.00000002 (TradeOgre) 0.0% |
$359,465 0.01 BTC |
0.000002 0.000002 |
$0.04 -$0.54 |
17% | 14% 13% | 13% |
Monero(XMR) |
BT: 1m 59s BR: 0.60 LB: 2,720,767 |
363,368,864,360 3.05 Gh/s |
0.0002 0.0002 |
0.00759100 (Binance) 0.6% |
$2,683,574,056 251.18 BTC |
0.000002 0.000002 |
$0.![]() -$0.62 |
12% | 12% 13% | 14% |
Nicehash-RandomX |
BT: — BR: — LB: — |
— 133.22 Mh/s |
0.000001 0.000002 |
0.00108299 (Nicehash) -4.5% |
— 0.15 BTC |
0.000001 0.000002 |
$0.03 -$0.62 |
11% | 11% 12% | 13% |
Last update at 2022-09-27 01:16:02 UTC
0025 1.31 TFLOPS
32.8 GPixel/s vs 16.3 GPixel/s
1653MHz vs 1350MHz
6612MHz vs 5400MHz
49.2 GTexels/s vs 40.

12 vs 11.2
105.8GB/s vs 86.4GB/s
768 vs 640
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Asus GeForce GTX 950?
- 30W below TDP?
60W vs 90W - Support 3D?
- 1 more DVI outputs?
2 vs 1 - 65.8mm narrower?
145mm vs 210.8mm
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
0004 XFX HD 6950 XXX 1GB
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX130
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX450 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia Quadro K4900
GeForce0003
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Asus GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Price Match
User Reviews
Overall Rating
Asus GeForce GTX 950
0 User Reviews
Asus GeForce GTX 950
0. 0 /10
0 reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2 Reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 TI
/10 9000 9000 2 Reviews 9000 9000 2 Exploration 9000 2 Reviews 9000 9000) Prices and quality
reviews are not
10.0 /10
2 Votes
reviews yet there are no
8.5 9 /10
2 Votes
performance
Reviews not yet
7.5 /10
2 Votes
Fan noise
Reviews are not yet
5.5 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 Votes clock speed0003
1020MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.turbo GPU
1190MHz
1085MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
32.8 GPixel/s
16. 3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
1.58 TFLOPS
1.31 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
49.2 GTexels/s
40.8 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1653MHz
1350MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs imaging units
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
6612MHz
5400MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
105.8GB/s
86.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4. memory bus width
128bit
128bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5.GDDR memory versions
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Asus GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5. GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 950)
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Asus GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 950)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Asus GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI 3.Version
HDMI 2.0
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003
Why is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
- 0.58 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
1.89 TFLOPS vs 1.31 TFLOPS - 23 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
39.3 GPixel/s vs 16.3 GPixel/s - 303MHz faster memory speed?
1653MHz vs 1350MHz - 1212MHz higher effective clock speed?
6612MHz vs 5400MHz - 18.
14 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
58.94 GTexels/s vs 40.8 GTexels/s - 0.8 newer version of DirectX? more memory bandwidth?
105.8GB/s vs 86.4GB/s - 128 more stream processors?
768 vs 640
fifty?
- 30W below TDP?
60W vs 90W - 36mm narrower?
145mm vs 181mm - 8mm lower?
111mm vs 119mm
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Gigabyte00003
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX110
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 003
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
XFX HD 6950 XXX 1GB
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GIGABYTE GEFORCE GTX 950
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE MX150
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 750 TI 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS0003
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Super Gaming X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
vs
XFX Radeon RX 550 2GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
User reviews Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Price comparison
0003
10. 0 /10
2 Votes
Games
7.0237 /10
1 VOTES
8.5 /10
2 Votes
9000
7.5 /10
2 VOTES
Fan noise
10.0 /10
1 Votes
5.5 /10
9000 2 Votes
9000
236 10.0
/10
1 Votes
10.0 /10
2 VOTES
performance
1. TECTION FECTION GP
1026MHz
1020MHZ
GPU (GPU) has a higher bore.
2.turbo GPU
1190MHz
1085MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
39.3 GPixel/s
16.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
1.89 TFLOPS
1.31 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
58.94 GTexels/s
40.8 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1653MHz
1350MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
6612MHz
5400MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
105.8GB/s
86.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4. memory bus width
128bit
128bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5. GDDR memory versions
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory debug code
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5. GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950)
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI 3.Version
HDMI 2.0
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
1026MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1350MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326. 6 MHz
1653MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
FLOPS
A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
1.4TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
1.52TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1085MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
1190MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375. 8 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
40.8 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
49.2 GTexels/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
105.8GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
5400MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984. 5 MHz
6612MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
2GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
2GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
5
Average: 4.5
5
Average: 4.5
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
128bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
128bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
Release date
2014-02-18 00:00:00
n/a
The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
60W
Average: 140.4W
90W
Average: 140.4W
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
28 nm
Average: 47. 5 nm
28 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
1870 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
2940 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Mean: 2.8
3
Mean: 2. 8
Width
145mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
210.8mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
Height
111mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
114.3mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
Purpose
Desktop
n.a.
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
3
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4
Shader model version
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5. 5
version VULKAN
1.3
1.1
version CUDA
5
is
HDMI Output
HDMI exit allows you to connect devices with ports of HDMI or Mini-HDMI. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show all
Yes
Yes
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
2
Mean: 1.4
one
Mean: 1.4
HDMI
Yes
Yes
Passmark score
3852
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
5301
max 29325
Average: 7628. 6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
30722
max 1
Average: 80042.3
36705
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3942
max 38276
Average: 12463
5493
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
4208
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
6084
max 49575
Average: 11859. 1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
5270
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
8184
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance score
21176
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
Unigine Heaven 3.0 score
53
max 60072
Average: 2402
max 60072
Average: 2402
Unigine Heaven 4.0 score
530
max 4818
Average: 1291. 1
max 4818
Average: 1291.1
Octane Render test score OctaneBench
34
max 125
Average: 47.1
39
max 125
Average: 47.1
Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 which is better?
General information | |
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
54%
0.5% (0. 000000001%) better than |
53.5% |
Architecture |
|
Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Codename |
|
GM107 | GM206 |
Type |
|
Desktop | Desktop |
Exit price |
|
$149
-10 $ (-6. |
159 $ |
Number of shaders |
|
640 | 768
128 (20%) better than |
Core clock |
|
1020MHz | 1024 MHz
At 4 MHz (0.40000000000001%) better than |
Boost frequency |
|
1085 MHz | 1188 MHz
103 MHz (9.5%) better than |
Number of transistors |
|
1.870 million | 2.940 million |
Process |
|
28 nm | 28 nm |
Interface |
|
PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
60W
-30 W (-33.3%) better than |
90W |
Length |
|
14.5 cm | 20.2 cm |
Additional power connectors |
|
no | 1x 6-pin |
G-SYNC support NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
SLI support |
|
n/a | + |
3D Vision |
|
+ | + |
GPU Boost |
|
+ | + |
GeForce Experience |
|
+ | + |
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
Surround |
|
n/a | + |
Adaptive Vertical Sync |
|
n/a | + |
Recommended power supply |
|
n/a | 350 Watt |
Multi-monitor support |
|
4 | 4 |
Decred / DCR (Decred) |
|
0.51 Gh/s | n/a |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) |
|
1 Sol/s | n/a |
Tire |
|
PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
640 | 768
128 (20%) better than |
Height |
|
11.1 cm | 11.1 cm |
HDCP |
|
+ | + |
Maximum resolution via VGA |
|
2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
Audio input for HDMI |
|
internal | internal |
GameStream |
|
n/a | + |
GeForce ShadowPlay |
|
GameWorks |
|
HDMI |
|
Blu Ray 3D |
|
+ | n/a |
3D Gaming |
|
+ | n/a |
3D Vision Live |
|
+ | n/a |
FXAA |
|
TXAA |
|
Adaptive VSync |
|
+ | n/a |
Video connectors |
|
1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x mini-HDMI | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2. |
DirectX |
|
12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Floating point performance |
|
1.389 gflops | 1.825 gflops |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
2.3 Mh/s | 9.97 Mh/s |
Memory | |
Memory type |
|
GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
128 bit | 128 bit |
Shared memory |
|
— | — |
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
5.4MHz | 6.6 MHz
1.2 MHz (22.2%) better than |
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
86.4 | 105.6
19.2 (22.2%) better than |
Comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti. What to choose?
GeForce GTX 950 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
August, 2015 | 1GHz | 2GB GDDR5 |
February, 2014 | 1GHz | 2GB GDDR5 |
Edelmark rating |
Edelmark rating |
Overall Comparison
Game Performance
Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation , Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
GeForce GTX 950 | 6.3 out of 10 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 5.9 out of 10 |
GeForce GTX 960 | 6.7 out of 10 |
Graphics
Tested on: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.
GeForce GTX 950 | 6.1 out of 10 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 7.2 out of 10 |
GeForce GTX 960 | 8. |
Computing power
The video card was tested on: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.
GeForce GTX 950 | 6.8 out of 10 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 6.0 out of 10 |
GeForce GTX 960 | 6.4 out of 10 |
Output per W
Tested with: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.
GeForce GTX 950 | 8.1 out of 10 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 8.4 out of 10 |
GeForce GTX 960 | 8.4 out of 10 |
Price-Performance
Tested with: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070 , Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, Best new price.
GeForce GTX 950 | n/a |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | n/a |
GeForce GTX 960 | n/a |
Noise and Power
Tested on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.
GeForce GTX 950 | 9.4 out of 10 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 9.6 out of 10 |
GeForce GTX 960 | 9.1 out of 10 |
Benefits
Why is the GeForce GTX 950 better?
Higher effective memory clock speed | 6.612 MHz | vs | 5.400 MHz | More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Faster pixel fill rate | 32.8GPixel/s | vs | 16.32 GPixel/s | More than 2x faster pixel fill rate |
Higher memory bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | More than 20% more memory bandwidth |
More raster operation blocks | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many raster operation blocks |
Higher memory clock speed | 1.653 MHz | vs | 1. |
More than 20% higher memory clock speed |
Better test Fire Strike | 44.05 | vs | 33.8 | More than 30% better Fire Strike test |
Overclocked turbo | 1.188 MHz | vs | 1.085 MHz | Approximately 10% higher turbo clock speed |
Slightly better bitcoin mining rating | 214.87 mHash/s | vs | 173.22 mHash/s | Approximately 25% better Bitcoin mining rating |
Higher frame rate in battlefield 4 | 48 | vs | 35 | More than 35% higher frame rate in battlefield 4 |
Why is the GeForce GTX 750 Ti better?
Lower power consumption | 60W | vs | 90W | Approximately 35% lower power consumption |
---|
Comparative benchmarks (benchmarks)
Bitcoin mining
GeForce GTX 950 | 214. |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 173.22 mHash/s |
Face Recognition
GeForce GTX 950 | 60.21 mPixels/s |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 44.94 mPixels/s |
Fire Strike test
GeForce GTX 950 | 44.05 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 33.8 |
Sky Diver test
GeForce GTX 950 | 302.89 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 255.03 |
Cloud Gate test
GeForce GTX 950 | 18.45 |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 17.81 |
Battlefield 4
90Radeon RX 580 XTRRadeon RX 580Radeon RX 570Radeon RX 560Radeon RX 550Radeon RX 480Radeon RX 470Radeon RX 460Radeon R9 Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770 HD 7770Radeon90Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4290 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 ( IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT50 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum Edition Radeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire Edition ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBRadeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4080 16GBGeForce RTX 4080 12GBGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev.
2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.
2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128 9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 43500 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT 128MBRadeon X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBR adeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4080 16GBGeForce RTX 4080 12GBGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev.
2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev.
2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.
2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128
You can simultaneously select
up to 10 video cards by holding Ctrl
Reviews of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950:
-
Review and testing of the top version of the GeForce GTX 950 from Gigabyte
Gigabyte GV-N950XTREME-2GD
-
Review and testing of the video card EVGA GeForce GTX 950 FTW ACX 2.0
EVGA GeForce GTX 950 FTW ACX 2.