GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon RX 570 Graphics cards Comparison
When comparing GeForce GTX 750 and Radeon RX 570, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 750 and Radeon RX 570 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 750
Check Price
Radeon RX 570
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 | Radeon RX 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 570 has 118% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon RX 570 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 750 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 570 — with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 570 is 148 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750.
- GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 570 — by 14 nm process technology.
- Radeon RX 570 is 236 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 750.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 570 is 6995 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 750 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 750 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 750. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 570 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 | Radeon RX 570 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 20 Ellesmere |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 18 February 2014 | 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1244 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 34. 72 | 159.2 |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 5,095 gflops |
Length | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) | 241 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3. 0 | |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
Multi monitor support | 3 displays | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
3D Gaming | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
3D Vision Live | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 143 Mh/s | |
Blu Ray 3D | + | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon Pro 460
- GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon R9 M470X
- Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon Pro 460
- Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon R9 M470X
- GeForce GTX 750 vs Quadro P3200
- GeForce GTX 750 vs Quadro P3200
- Radeon RX 570 vs Quadro P3200
- Radeon RX 570 vs Quadro P3200
AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon RX 570
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 3668. 9x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 1400x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 6967 vs 3900
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 626 vs 505
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 40810 vs 12753
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 42.463
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 642.715
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 2.933
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 26.532
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 133.458
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 4843
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3329
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 4843
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3329
- 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 3854 vs 1271
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 18 February 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5. 4 GB/s |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 6967 vs 3900 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 626 vs 505 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 40810 vs 12753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 vs 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 26. 532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 3854 vs 1271 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- 272. 4x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3624
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3624
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3624 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 6967 | 3900 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 626 | 505 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 40810 | 12753 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 3854 | 1271 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | GCN 4. 0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GM107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 315 | 621 |
Price now | $149. 99 | $299.01 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | 15.02 |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 39. 81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini. .. |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2. 0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
4K h364 Decode | ||
4K h364 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
h365/HEVC Decode | ||
h365/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |
0026 1168MHz vs 1020MHz
5.09 TFLOPS vs 1.31 TFLOPS
39.8 GPixel/s vs 16.3 GPixel/s
1750MHz vs 1350MHz
4GB vs 2GB
7000MHz 9Is 0028 vs 5400MHz
12 vs 11.2
159.2 GTexels/s vs 40.8 GTexels/s
- 60W below TDP?
60W vs 120W - 12°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
62°C vs 74°C - Supports 3D?
- 6°C lower GPU idle temperature?
25°C vs 31°C - 1 more DVI outputs?
2 vs 1 - 101mm narrower?
145mm vs 246mm - 19mm lower?
111mm vs 130mm
Which comparisons are the most popular?
MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
vs
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 570 8GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
vs
ASRock Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX 570 OC 4GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
MSI Radeon RX 580
MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
VS
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 750 TI
VS
NVIDIA GTORCE GTRITRENA 9000 DDRI 9000 9000 DDRI 9000 9000 DDRI 9000 9000 DDRA 9000 9000 DDRA 9000 MSITA0003
vs
MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming 4GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 10500003
MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
vs
Galax GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
vs
MSI Radeon RX 570 Mech 2 OC 8GB
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 750 Ti
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 960
MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 3060 TI
0003
2 reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
10. 0266 /10
2 Reviews of users
Functions
Cost ratio
Reviews yet not
9000 votes
Games
No reviews yet
8.5 /10
2 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
003
7.5 /10
2 VOTES
SIMENTION OF WORK
Reviews are not
5.5 /10
2 VOTES
Reliability
Reviews yet not
9000 9000 /
2 votes
Performance
GPU clock speed
1168MHz
1020MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
1244MHz
1085MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
pixel rate
39.8 GPixel/s
16.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
FLOPS
5.09 TFLOPS
1.31 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
texture size
159.2 GTexels/s
40.8 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
GPU memory speed
1750MHz
1350MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
Shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
texture units (TMUs)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
effective memory speed
7000MHz
5400MHz
The effective memory clock is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
maximum memory bandwidth
224GB/s
86.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
memory bus width
256bit
128bit
Wider memory bus — this means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
GDDR version
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
version of OpenCL
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
Supports multi-monitor technology
✔MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
GPU temperature at boot
Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
supports ray tracing
✖MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
Supports 3D
✖MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
supports DLSS
✖MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
has HDMI output
✔MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.
HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI version
HDMI 2.0
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.
DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003
Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Which graphic cards are better?
Compare AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop)
versus
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop)
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 3 year(s) 2 month3(s)
- Boost 11% more: 1206-1244 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 3668.9 times more texturing speed: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Number of shader processors 3.2 times more: 2048 vs 640
- A newer production process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- The maximum memory size is 4 times more (and ): 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Memory frequency 1400 times more: 7000 MHz vs 5. 4 GB/s
Release date | 18 April 2017 vs 18 February 2014 |
Boost core clock | 1206-1244 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texturing speed | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel/s |
Number of shaders | 2048 vs 640 |
Process | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8GB vs 2GB |
Memory frequency | 7000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- About 10% more core clock: 1020 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- 272. 4 times greater floating point performance: 1.389 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- 2.5 times less power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
Core clock | 1020 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
Floating point performance | 1.389 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 3900 | |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 505 | |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 12753 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 1271 |
Performance comparison
AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | GCN 4. 0 | Maxwell |
Codename | Ellesmere | GM107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Generation GCN | 4th Gen | |
Issue date | April 18, 2017 | February 18, 2014 |
Price at first issue date | $599.99 | $149 |
Place in the rating | not rated | 621 |
Price now | $149. 99 | $299.01 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 59.00 | 15.02 |
Boost core clock | 1206-1244 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core frequency | 926-1168 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Floating point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 1.389 gflops |
Process | 14nm | 28nm |
Number of shaders | 2048 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 39. 81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texturing speed | 159.23 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
Number of CUDA conveyors | 640 | |
Video connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini. .. |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum resolution VGA | 2048×1536 | |
Multi-monitor support | ||
CrossFire without bridge | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3. 0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Notebook size | large | |
Recommended power supply | 450 Watt | |
Tire | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) | |
Additional power connectors | None | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12. 0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Maximum memory size | 8GB | 2GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256bit | 128 Bit |
Memory frequency | 7000MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
4K h364 Decode | ||
4K h364 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.
|