Gtx 770 vs r9 280x: R9 280X vs GTX 770 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-3770K vs i7-3770K)

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770: which is the best graphics card?

Graphics cards are big business for AMD and Nvidia, and both have released new product ranges this year. The Radeon R9 280X and GeForce GTX 770 are crucial for both companies: they’re within reach for many PC gamers, but they’re still powerful enough to function as their only graphics purchase for two or three years.

On paper there’s not much between AMD’s R9 280X and the GTX 770. The former card will set you back at least £239, and the latter costs a mere three pounds more. They’re not far apart on the spec sheet, either; the AMD card runs at 850MHz and churns out a maximum single precision performance figure of 3,315.2 GFLOPS, and the Nvidia hardware fights back with 3,213 GFLOPS.

You may also like:

  • Best Cheap Graphics Card Group Test
  • GTX 750 Ti vs R7 265 Comparison
  • Best SSD Group Test

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770: How we tested

To work out which is the best graphics card to buy we’ve run Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and Crysis 3 at each game’s toughest setting and 1,920 x 1,080 resolution and looked the idle and peak temperatures and power use of the two cards to see which is the most effecient.

Our test rig for this test consisted of an Asus X79-Deluxe motherboard, Intel Core i7-4960X processor, 16GB of RAM and a 1TB hard disk.

To get prices for each card we visited www.scan.co.uk and noted down the cheapest stock-speed card we could find, although we will be referring to the various overclocked and tweaked models available for each GPU, which will be more expensive, later on in the review.

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770: Battlefield 4 Performance

Battlefield 4 is the latest instalment in EA’s shooter franchise and
it’s been optimised for AMD graphics, so we had high hopes for the
Radeon R9 280X.

High at 1,920 x 1,080

The AMD card delivered in most of our benchmarks. The R9 280X returned
minimum and average framerates of 87fps and 103.4fps, with the GTX 770
behind on 79fps and 97.71fps.

Very High at 1,920 x 1,080

The two cards traded blows when we upgraded the quality to Ultra – Battlefield 4’s toughest test. The R9 280X’s minimum framerate of 42fps was two frames slower than the Nvidia hardware, but the AMD card fought back with an average framerate of 58.76fps – around one frame faster than the GTX 770.

It’s almost a clean sweep for the red team, then, and it’s no surprise – AMD’s gaming programme means its engineers have visited Battlefield developer DICE and optimised the game to take advantage of Radeon hardware. While the Nvidia card was faster in one test, that was a minimum framerate benchmark, and neither card struggled to play Battlefield 4 at a smooth framerate.

That means it’s a clear victory for the Radeon HD 280X: if you want to play Battlefield, AMD hardware is the kit to buy.

R9 280X vs GTX 770: which is the best graphics card for Battlefield 4?

SEE ALSO: 10 best games of 2013

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770: Bioshock Infinite Performance

Battlefield 4 was a clean sweep for AMD, but Bioshock Infinite saw Nvidia fight back.

Ultra at 1,920 x 1,080

We ran the game at 1,920 x 1,080 and at its Ultra settings, and the GTX
770 served up minimum and average framerates of 21.34fps and 84.03fps:
the former figure was marginally ahead of the R9 280X’s 20.25fps and
73.24fps scores.

Very High at 1,920 x 1,080

The result was less clear-cut when we ran the game at its less demanding Very High quality levels. While the GTX 770’s average framerate of 118.92fps trumped the 112.53fps scored by the AMD card, the R9 280X scored a minimum framerate of 29.99fps – a better score than the 21.82fps from the Nvidia card.

That minimum framerate figure means that there’s no clean sweep for Nvidia, but the GeForce GTX 770 convincingly takes the prize in this test – and the high average figures from the GTX 770 mean we’re not concerned about its slightly lower minimum result in one benchmark, especially when it took back its crown in a more demanding test.

While both cards will easily play this title across a single screen, the GTX 770 was between six and eleven frames ahead in both average-framerate benchmarks, and that makes it the winner here.

R9 280X vs GTX 770: which is the best graphics card for Bioshock Infinite?

SEE ALSO: 10 best Xbox One games

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770: Crysis 3 Performance

Crysis 3 comes from Crytek – the makers of the original Crysis, which
had a reputation for making PCs cry – so it’s fitting that this game is
the toughest out of the three we’ve measured in this battle.

Our
results showed a consistent difference between the two cards: while the
Radeon R9 280X usually had better minimum framerates, the GTX 770
always returned faster averages.

Very High at 1,920 x 1,080

Both cards hit a minimum of 32fps when the game was run at its standard
Very High settings, but the GTX 770 took a significant lead in the
average benchmark: its 49. 86fps score easily outpaced the 40.75fps of
the R9 280X.

Very High at 1,920 x 1,080 with 4xAA

We added 4x anti-aliasing to the game and the R9 280X’s 26fps
minimum was five frames ahead of the Nvidia card – but the GTX 770’s
38.23fps average was almost seven frames quicker than AMD.

Very High at 1,920 x 1,080 with 8xAA

That pattern was repeated when we bumped up to 8x anti-aliasing: the AMD card’s 21fps minimum framerate was four frames better than its rival, but the GTX 770 hit an average of 30.53fps – and the R9 280X could only manage 25.31fps. Crucially, that means the Nvidia card was the only one to return a playable framerate in Crysis 3.

The AMD card’s higher minimum framerates initially bode well for all-round performance in Crysis 3, but the GTX 770 was consistently quicker in average framerate tests – and it was the only card to remain playable when we ran this tough benchmark with 8x anti-aliasing. For that reason, this test goes to Nvidia.

R9 280X vs GTX 770: which is best graphics card for Crysis 3?

SEE ALSO: 10 best PS4 games

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770: Power, Heat and Noise

The Nvidia card might have taken the crown in two out of the three
gaming tests, but it didn’t need extra heat or power in order to take a
convincing lead.

Idle/peak power

When the GTX 770 was slotted into our high-end test rig, the entire
machine pulled 145W from the mains – eight Watts fewer than the R9 280X
demanded. The gap only widened when we stress-testing the cards: the GTX
770’s peak figure of 432W was significantly lower than the 474W pull of
the R9 280X.

Idle/peak temperature

The gap was closer in temperature tests. The GTX 770’s idle temperature of 34°C was two frames lower than the R9 280X, and both cards hit peak temperatures of 76°C. There’s little between the two cards, then, and temperature also depends on which card you buy: some will be overclocked and run hotter, while others will have better coolers.

Both cards churned out a comparable amount of noise from their dual-fan coolers during our more demanding games tests, but neither was particularly loud – speakers will easily drown them out. And, as with temperature figures, the noise level of a card will be determined by which third-party model you buy.

Once again, though, Nvidia runs out the winner in this category – chiefly because of its more frugal power use.

R9 280X vs GTX 770: which is the best for Power, Heat and Noise?

Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770: Other Things to Consider

We’ve tested reference cards in this battle, but the graphics card market includes a wide variety of cards with different features and price points.

AMD Radeon R9 280X cards range in price from £239 to a mighty £311, and cards at the top end of the scale always arrive overclocked, with the stock speed of 850MHz boosted to 1,150MHz in most cases – and with Boost speeds that tend to go between 50MHz and 70MHz higher still.

Other models aren’t as interested in overclocking – instead of trying to hit maximum performance, they have more efficient coolers that are quieter than standard models.

The situation is similar with Nvidia, although the GTX 770 is an older card, so there are more models to choose from. While you can pay £242 for a stock-speed model, this card could cost you a mighty £467. That’s an absurd amount, and it’s reserved for EVGA’s Hydro C card, which has 4GB of RAM and two in-built connections for water-cooling. The most expensive air-cooled GTX 770 costs £312, and it comes with a core that’s been overclocked from 1,085MHz to 1,137MHz.

GTX 770 cards are available in similar formats to their AMD rivals, with most arriving overclocked – GPUs typically high around 1,150MHz, with Turbo speeds hitting at around 1,200MHz.
There are plenty of cards to choose from – but also consider your own computer before shelling out on a new GPU. Both cards need single eight-pin and one six-pin power connectors, so make sure your PSU has the right plugs – and also ensure you’ve got at least a 500W unit inside your machine.

Also ensure that you have enough physical space inside your PC to accommodate these cards: our R9 280X and GTX 770 samples are 268mm and 272mm long respectively, and other cards could be larger. They’re also wide enough to occupy two slots on your motherboard.

Both of these cards plug in to PCI-Express x16 slots, so make sure you’ve got one free, and different cards will have different display outputs – find a card that matches your monitor or make sure you’ve got the right adapter.

AMD and Nvidia also try to tempt potential buyers with free games. AMD has its “Never Settle Forever” bundle, which generally grants gamers three free titles when they buy an R9 280X – although precisely which games are available is usually up to board partners. Nvidia, meanwhile, has its Pirates, Heroes and Spies bundle, which gives anyone who buys a GTX 770 free copies of Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag, Batman: Arkham Origins and Spinter Cell Blacklist.

R9 280X vs GTX770: which is the best graphics card?

It’s a close-run thing between these two cards at the checkout, but there’s a clear winner when it comes to actual performance. The GeForce GTX 770 takes a clear lead in Bioshock Infinite, and its average framerates in Crysis 3 are much higher – and in Battlefield 4, an AMD-branded game, it’s still easily able to handle top graphics levels. It does this using less power, too, which can never hurt.

Both of these cards are able to handle top-end games, but Nvidia’s GPU is ahead in more of our benchmarks. That’s why it’s our choice if you want to buy a graphics card for a little over £200.

Next, read Steam OS Guide: Steam OS and Steam Machines Explained

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 770: What is the difference?

45points

AMD Radeon R9 280X

43points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

MSI GamingXFX Double DMSI Gaming OCAsus ROG MatrixAsus DirectCU II

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon R9 280X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Why is AMD Radeon R9 280X better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 770?

  • 0. 27 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    3.48 TFLOPSvs3.21 TFLOPS
  • 40W lower TDP?
    190Wvs230W
  • 1.5x more VRAM?
    3GBvs2GB
  • 64GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    288GB/svs224GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus width?
    384bitvs256bit
  • 512 more shading units?
    2048vs1536
  • 773million more transistors?
    4313 millionvs3540 million
  • 19°C lower load GPU temperature?
    63°Cvs82°C

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 better than AMD Radeon R9 280X?

  • 196MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1046MHzvs850MHz
  • 6.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    33.5 GPixel/svs27.2 GPixel/s
  • 253MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1753MHzvs1500MHz
  • 1012MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    7012MHzvs6000MHz
  • 25 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    134 GTexels/svs109 GTexels/s
  • 85MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1085MHzvs1000MHz
  • 1171 higher PassMark (G3D) result?
    6289vs5118
  • Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

AMD Radeon R9 370X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

AMD Radeon R9 280

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX350

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

AMD Radeon R9 280X

vs

AMD Radeon R9 380

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

850MHz

1046MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1000MHz

1085MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

27.2 GPixel/s

33.5 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

3.48 TFLOPS

3.21 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

109 GTexels/s

134 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1500MHz

1753MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

6000MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2. maximum memory bandwidth

288GB/s

224GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

384bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon R9 280X

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon R9 280X

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon R9 280X

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon R9 280X

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon R9 280X

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1. has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon R9 280X

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 280X)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 280X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 770)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 280X



  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 280X
  • GeForce GTX 770

    102%

  • Radeon R9 280X

    100%

Relative performance

  • GeForce GTX 770

    100%

  • Radeon R9 280X

    114%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 770
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 280X
14% higher gaming performance.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Mantle
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (39 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 770 Radeon R9 280X
GPU Name GK104 (GK104-425-A2) vs Tahiti (Tahiti XTL)
Fab Process 28 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 294 mm² vs 352 mm²
Transistors 3,540 million vs 4,313 million
Shaders 1536 vs 2048
Compute Units 8 vs 32
Core clock 1046 MHz vs 850 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 32
TMUs 128 vs 128

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 770 Radeon R9 280X
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 256 bit vs 384 bit
Memory Speed 1753 MHz


7012 MHz effective
vs 1500 MHz


6000 MHz effective
Memory Size 2048 Mb vs 3072 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 770 Radeon R9 280X
TDP 230 watts vs 250 watts
Release Date 30 May 2013 vs 8 Oct 2013
  • GeForce GTX 770

    33. 50 GP/s

  • Radeon R9 280X

    27.20 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 770

    134.00 GT/s

  • Radeon R9 280X

    109.00 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 770

    224.00 GB/s

  • Radeon R9 280X

    288.00 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 770

    3213.00 GFLOPs

  • Radeon R9 280X

    3482.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 770

    11180

  • Radeon R9 280X

    10960

Points (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    36

  • Radeon R9 280X

    40

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    21.7

  • Radeon R9 280X

    26.7

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    85.2

  • Radeon R9 280X

    86. 9

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    56.1

  • Radeon R9 280X

    54.3

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait

  • GeForce GTX 770

    40

  • Radeon R9 280X

    40

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    86.1

  • Radeon R9 280X

    100.7

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    64.8

  • Radeon R9 280X

    66.5

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    33.8

  • Radeon R9 280X

    32.9

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    58

  • Radeon R9 280X

    63

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    29

  • Radeon R9 280X

    30

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Details

  • GeForce GTX 770

    46

  • Radeon R9 280X

    47

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    24

  • Radeon R9 280X

    30

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    11. 3

  • Radeon R9 280X

    15.5

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    52.9

  • Radeon R9 280X

    56.5

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    36.6

  • Radeon R9 280X

    36

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait

  • GeForce GTX 770

    30

  • Radeon R9 280X

    33

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    52

  • Radeon R9 280X

    48

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    63.7

  • Radeon R9 280X

    77.9

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    44.8

  • Radeon R9 280X

    49.9

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    20.1

  • Radeon R9 280X

    21.1

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    41

  • Radeon R9 280X

    47

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 770

    45

  • Radeon R9 280X

    51

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    23

  • Radeon R9 280X

    25

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Details

  • GeForce GTX 770

    33

  • Radeon R9 280X

    36

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    14

  • Radeon R9 280X

    18

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    10. 4

  • Radeon R9 280X

    12.7

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    25.1

  • Radeon R9 280X

    28.1

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    17.6

  • Radeon R9 280X

    18.3

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    37

  • Radeon R9 280X

    46.9

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    26.5

  • Radeon R9 280X

    33.7

FPS (higher is better)

  • GeForce GTX 770

    13.1

  • Radeon R9 280X

    14.8

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    13

  • Radeon R9 280X

    16

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Details

  • GeForce GTX 770

    6

  • Radeon R9 280X

    18

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality,2x MSAA,16x AF, HBAO

  • GeForce GTX 770

    67

  • Radeon R9 280X

    72

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality,DDOD, FX AA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    81

  • Radeon R9 280X

    69

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Very High Quality, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    49

  • Radeon R9 280X

    42

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 770

    61

  • Radeon R9 280X

    69

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 770

    64

  • Radeon R9 280X

    67

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, AAA standard, 16xAF, Motion Blur normal, Tesselation normal

  • GeForce GTX 770

    50

  • Radeon R9 280X

    50

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 770 Radeon R9 380
VS
GeForce GTX 770 Radeon R9 285
VS
Radeon R9 280X Radeon R9 380X
VS
Radeon R9 280X Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
VS
Radeon RX 470D GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770

At a Glance

Our Verdict

The decision over which GPU to choose will come down largely to money. Neither GPU offers much in the way of new technology (although the Mantle support on the 280X might prove a significant innovation in years to come), but the GTX 770 is less power-intensive, and operates more quietly. Crucially, it’s also a faster GPU, even if there isn’t usually more than a few frames in it. So price becomes the crucial issue. The MSI GTX 770 ends up being the cheapest of all cards, making this the best buy. In truth, though, if there’s a difference in price of less than £20, the GTX 770 is the product to have. There would be a slight concern about the memory, and the 3GB of the 280X is likely to look better two years from now. But assuming you’re not looking to run games with multi-monitors, the memory is unlikely to be a killer. The GTX 770, then, looks the slightly better deal. Both, though, are very impressive pieces of silicon that offer superb frame rates for the money.

While the majority of consumers are looking to spend £200 or less on their graphics card, the AMD Radeon R9 280X and nVidia GTX 770 GPUs are the products for those who wish to spend a little extra in pursuit of high speeds – but without pushing into the bank-busting territory of the R9 290X and GTX 780 ranges. We’ll have a look at the specifications of the 280X and GTX 770, and try to cast some light on which of the two offers the more compelling deal. (For more, see
AMD Radeon HD 7970 vs nVidia GTX 770 graphics card comparison review: best GPU for £250-£260.)

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: out with VLIW and in with GCN

When AMD disbanded its old VLIW (Very Long Instruction Word) architecture in 2012, and replaced it with an all-new GCN (Graphics Core Next) platform, this marked a seachange in the company’s thinking. The older VLIW technology had been very good at simply hurling pixels and texels at the screen, but lacked finesse when it came to applications other than straightforward 3D graphics.

With big rival nVidia have long adopted ‘scalar’ architecture that could think on the spot more easily, and try its hand at a number of different application types (including the increasingly important Compute code), it was important that AMD brought its main GPU framework into line with modern developments. Having done that with GCN (Tahiti), the company now feels it can spend a bit of time developing the platform rather than coming up with another dramatic overhaul. The Radeon R9 280X, then, is less a radical new product, but more a culmination of everything that’s good about the GCN architecture.

To a certain extent, the same could be said of the GTX 770. This GPU is built around the GK104 (Kepler), a splendid chip which has seen service in a range of nVidia products, from the older GTX 660 and 680s, to the GTX 750 and 760. The GTX 770 refresh came in 2013, but the GK104 is considerably older than that. As such, it’s perhaps unsurprising to notice the GTX 770 looking relatively unsophisticated in contrast with even the R9 280X.

Both the GTX 770 and R9 280X are created using the 0.28nm manufacturing process, but the AMD is stuffed with considerably more transistors – 4.31 billion rather than the 3.5 billion of the GTX 770. And while the R9 280X has a healthy 3GB of memory as its default configuration (in line with many previous GCN GPUs), the GTX 770 starts with a mere 2GB. You can buy a 4GB version of the 770, but this will cost you around an extra £50. We’ll look later at whether this is necessary or not.

In many respects, the R9 280X is rather like the older HD 7970. That 7970 pushed the Tahiti chip to its limits, enabling all 32 of its CUs (computing units), and achieving 2048 stream processors and 128 texture units. The R9 280X follows in almost identical footsteps, offering the same complement of stream processors and texture units. The GTX 770 is much of the same mind, enabling all eight of the GK104’s SMXes (Streaming Multiprocessors), and delivering the same 128 texture units.

The streaming processors are a little down in number, though, and even this maximum version of the GK104 can offer no more than 1536 stream processors. It’s important not to get too hung up on that difference, though. Directly comparing the AMD and nVidia architectures has frequently been a rather misleading activity, and AMD’s solutions have frequently housed larger numbers of streaming processors, but not always with apparent benefit. We’ll see presently whether the AMD architecture delivers on its promise.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: core clock speeds

It’s not as though AMD hasn’t pulled back the throttle elsewhere. Strangely, despite the R9 280X seeming, in many respects, to be like the older HD 7970, the R9 falls back in terms of clock speeds. The standard factory settings allow for a core clock rate of just 850MHz – the 7970 offered 9. 25GHz. However, unlike the standard 7970, the 280X does at least have a Boost facility, allowing it to hit 1GHz. Not that this allows it to match up to its nVidia rival, and the GTX 770 starts off with a simple 1046MHz clock rate, before building on it with a Boost that propels the card to 1085MHz.

Board manufacturers have tried to squeeze the extra potential from both cards. Typical 280X boards top out at about 1,070MHz, although it’s certainly possible to find 1,100MHz, and even 1,150MHz models. Such a figure is fairly average for the GTX 770, where speeds in the region of 1,189MHz to 1,202MHz are available in large numbers. In short, the GTX 770 definitely seems to have a sizeable advantage in terms of core clock speeds.

The 770 and the R9 280X both have the same number of texture units (128), so that rise in clock speeds becomes significant when we look at texture fill rates. Using the factory settings of both GPUs, the GTX 770 is noticeably faster, hitting a figure of 138. 9GT/sec in reply to the 280X’s less impressive 128GT/sec. The lead increases if you look at typical third-party boards that use these GPUs. A good number of GTX 770 cards reach texture fill rates of between 152.2GT/sec to 153.9GT/sec, whereas the majority of the 280X boards are stuck in the region of 134.4GT/sec to 140.8GT/sec. The GTX 770 seems to have a healthy lead here, then.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: memory clock speeds

The relative lack of complexity in the GTX 770 means that it can run higher clock speeds across the board. It repeats the trick with the memory, and its 1.75GHz rate works out as an effective 7GHz when the quadrupling effect of the RAM is taken into account. That 7GHz is right at the edge of what’s achievable with the current memory chips, and so comprises an impressive achievement. The R9 280X makes no attempt to match this, plumping instead for a 1,502MHz (6,008MHz DDR effective) memory clock. This is by no means poor, and many other cards (the GTX 760 amongst them) offer similar figures. However, it is still advantage to the GTX 770 in terms of raw clock rates.

That advantage doesn’t last, though. That’s primarily down to a disparity in memory interfaces. While the GTX 770 is saddled with a middling 256bit interface, the 280X’s extends to a sizeable 384 bits. Bandwidth calculations show that this gives the Radeon a very great boost in terms of its ability to juggle graphics data, and its rate of 288.4GB/sec destroys the GTX 770’s comparatively meagre figure of 224GB/sec. The very best third-party 280X cards stretch the memory clock to 6.4GHz, giving the Radeon an unassailable 307.2GB/sec – even the most powerfully overclocked GTX 770 can only reach 230.4GB/sec. This section, then, hands a victory to the 280X.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: is 2GB sufficient?

While the Radeon has a default figure of 3GB, the GTX 770 starts at just 2GB – although you can buy a 4GB version of the GTX as well. For standard single-screen gaming, 2GB will be more than sufficient, and you’re unlikely to see a difference of more than a frame or two unless the game is incredibly complex. However, if you’re going up to a dual-screen setup, and pushing the resolution beyond 2560×1440/1600, the 2GB complement could feel inadequate.

The question really is how ambitious are you as a gamer? The 2GB GTX 770 is well-priced for a card that should give you powerful frame rates for the next two years. Whether it’ll retains its freshness in 2016/2017, though, is hard to say. Certainly 4GB will make it more future-proof. For standard gaming, though, 2GB will be more than sufficient.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: other features

Both GPUs offer an identical number of Raster Operations – 32. Both are also capable of impeccable three-display gaming, although the GTX 770 adds the potential of PhysX support. This feature is unlikely to be a ncher though, as we have yet to see gamers programmers produce the support that makes it a must-have. The GTX 770 is superior in terms of power output, and works on a more efficient and less hungry design. The 770 is also the quieter card, so those who like to watch their decibels may be swayed by the nVidia.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: higher-end for higher-compute?

The difference between gaming systems and higher-end machines – which traditionally have used Quadro-Tesla chips – has been falling in recent years. The new generation of GPUs are the first ‘home’ versions that can be expected to produce strong performance in high-end calculations, such as those practised by Compute. Or, at least, that’s the idea. Although the GTX 770 could, theoretically, offer strong Compute capabilities, such features have been heavily limited by nVidia.

That’s not so in the case of the R9 280X, where AMD has allowed it to offer searing FP64 (64bit double-precision) calculations. In this area, the 280X manages to beat the 7970 (itself no slouch at Compute). It still lags behind the nVidia Titan, but then, that card costs twice as much, and is very much tailored towards higher-end users.

Should gamers care too much about the 280X’s Compute capabilities? Well, it shouldn’t be a deal-clincher, certainly, but it does hint at the huge versatility within the R9 280X. If you’re looking to the future, the Radeon looks better-placed to ride the trends.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: the might of mantle?

A potential powder keg comes courtesy of AMD – in the shape of Mantle. This is an API (Application Programming Interface) that’s designed to squeeze extra performance and capabilities from AMD’s GCN hardware that existing generic APIs (such as OpenGL and Direct3D) simply can’t deliver. The problem is that games programmers will need to support Mantle directly, raising the prospect of games being released that require AMD hardware to work – or to work to their fullest.

This would potentially fragment the market, taking us back to the PC’s earlier days, when picking a brand of graphics card meant far more than a trimmer price tag or a bit of extra speed. Whether AMDs’s attempt to grab a stranglehold succeeds will depend on gaming companies. AMD should get an extra boost there thanks to Mantle’s strong crossover appeal with the Xbox One games console. In truth, it’s unlikely to be significant for the next year or so, but it’ll be interesting (and will perhaps pose something of a dilemma) to see whether, one day, a GPU-specific API like Mantle looks like genuinely splitting the graphics card market. (See also:
nVidia GTX 760 v Radeon HD 7950 GPU comparison: which is the best mid-range graphics card?)

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: benchmark tests

While the specifications tend to be fairly important, the best technology in the world can’t help the card if it doesn’t hit the heights in real-world gaming. We’ve witnessed the clash of these two powerful cards, setting them against one another at default settings, and across four different titles and three resolutions. So that you have some sort of benchmark to compare them to, we’ve also dropped in a GTX 760 (at round about £200), so that you have a yardstick.

Crysis 3
  Crysis 3 Crysis 3 Crysis 3
  1,680×1,050 1,900×1,200 2,560×1,600
GTX 770 54. 8 45.1 28.4
Rad R9 280X 50.5 39.8 24.6
       
GTX 760 42.9 33.8 18.7

The 770 squeezes out a noticeable but not massive lead at the lowest resolution of 1680×1,050, scooping up an extra 4.3fps. This lead falls only slightly as the detail levels climb, resulting in a 3.8fps deficit at 2,560×1,600 – this is actually a larger lead in terms of percentages. The 760 is substantially behind both the 770 and 280X, finishing 7.6fps behind the latter at the lowest resolution, and closing that marginally (to 5.9fps) over the highest mode.

Bioshock Infinite Rage
  Bioshock
Infinite Rage
Bioshock
Infinite Rage
Bioshock
Infinite Rage
  1,600×900 1,900×1,200 2,560×1,600
GTX 770 99.6 76.4 44. 0
Rad R9 280X 96.3 74.2 42.3
       
GTX 760 78.9 59.9 34.7

The GTX 770 wins again here, but not by much. The 280X is within 3.3fps of it at 1,600×900, and just 1.7fps away at 2,560×1,600. The GTX 760 is a long way behind both, falling back some 17.4fps from the 280X at the lowest resolution. It does partially bridge that gap as the detail levels are piled on though, and strangely, the lead is just 7.6fps at 2,560×1,600.

Battlefield 3
  Battlefield 3 Battlefield 3 Battlefield 3
  1,600×900 1,920×1,080 2,560×1,600
GTX 770 101.0 80.6 39.7
Rad R9 280X 92.8 73.7 36.3
       
GTX 760 85.3 66.6 33. 8

Battlefield 3 is a very straightforward benchmark, and the GTX 770 obliges with a monster three-figure score at 1,600×900, placing it some 8.2fps ahead of the 280X. At the highest resolution, that gap is closed very significantly, with the 280X just 3.4fps behind as the detail reaches its stickiest levels. The GTX 760 is a further 7.5fps back from the 280X at the lowest resolution, but a more respectable 2.5fps behind at 2,560×1,600.

Assassin’s Creed 3
  Assassin’s Creed 3 Assassin’s Creed 3 Assassin’s Creed 3
  1,600×900 1,920×1,080 2,560×1,600
GTX 770 83.2 69.1 46.8
Rad R9 280X 78.6 64.8 44.1
       
GTX 760 66.8 54.0 37.7

The GTX 770 finishes with another capable but not gigantic lead, its 1,600×900 resolution yielding a lead of 4. 6fps, while the top resolution sees it just 2.7fps ahead – noticeable, but only just. The GTX 760 is a rather gaping 11.8fps behind the 280X at the lowest resolution, but closes to within 6.4fps at the top 2,560×1,600 mode.

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: verdict

The decision over which GPU to choose will come down largely to money. Neither GPU offers much in the way of new technology (although the Mantle support on the 280X might prove a significant innovation in years to come), but the GTX 770 is less power-intensive, and operates more quietly. Crucially, it’s also a faster GPU, even if there isn’t usually more than a few frames in it.

So price becomes the crucial issue. The MSI GTX 770 ends up being the cheapest of all cards, making this the best buy. In truth, though, if there’s a difference in price of less than £20, the GTX 770 is the product to have. There would be a slight concern about the memory, and the 3GB of the 280X is likely to look better two years from now. But assuming you’re not looking to run games with multi-monitors, the memory is unlikely to be a killer. The GTX 770, then, looks the slightly better deal. Both, though, are very impressive pieces of silicon that offer superb frame rates for the money. (See also:
GTX 760 vs GTX 770 GPU comparison review: Which GK104 Kepler graphics card is best?)

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs nVidia GeForce GTX 770: available graphics cards

GTX 770

£252 – MSI GTX 770 Twin Frozr – 2GB, Core Clock 1,098MHz (1,150MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7GHz, 2yr Warranty
£270 – Asus GeForce GTX 770 DirectCU OC – 2GB, Core Clock 1,058MHz (1,110MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7GHz, 3yr Warranty
£276 – Gigabyte GeForce GTX 770 WindForce 3x OC – 2GB, Core Clock 1,137MHz (1,189MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7GHz, 3yr Warranty
£300 – KFA2 GeForce GTX 770 LTD OC – 2GB, Core Clock 1,150MHz (1,202MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7GHz, 2yr Warranty
£320 – Gainward GeForce GTX 770 Phantom – 4GB, Core Clock 1,046MHz (1,085MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7GHz, 2yr Warranty
£330 – Inno3D GeForce GTX 770 iChill Herculez 4096MB – 4GB, Core Clock 1,150MHz (1,196MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7. 2GHz, 3yr Warranty
£360 – EVGA GeForce GTX 770 Classified ACX 4096MB – 4GB, Core Clock 1,150MHz (1,202MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7GHz, 3yr Warranty

Verdict – For the very best of value, look to those 2GB cards, as you won’t generally see more than a frame-rate or two extra when lashing for the more expensive 4GB versions.The Gigabyte and KFA2 offer some very juicy stats, especially when you’re focusing on the Boost clock speed. But you don’t need to eke out every last drop of pace. Purely as a value buy, the MSI is fantastic, and its highly-capable 1,150MHz Boost clock means you’ll hardly notice the difference between this and the KFA2. If you’re looking to the longer term, you may find the extra RAM worth it though. The Inno3D is probably the best choice here, and the 1,196MHz Boost clock means that the £330 price tag isn’t too bitter a pill to swallow.

Radeon R9 280X

£260 – Powercolor Radeon R9 280X TurboDUO – 3GB, Core Clock 880MHz (1,030MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 6,008MHz, 2yr Warranty
£270 – Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Dual-X OC – 3GB, Core Clock 870MHz (1,020MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 6,008MHz, 2yr Warranty
£290 – Gigabyte Radeon R9 280X WindForce 3X OC – 3GB, Core Clock 1GHz (1. 1GHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 6,008MHz, 3yr Warranty
£300 – MSI Radeon R9 280X Gaming Edition OC – 3GB, Core Clock 1GHz (1,050MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 6,008MHz, 3yr Warranty
£300 – Asus Radeon R9 280X DirectCUII – 3GB, Core Clock 970MHz (1,070MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 6.4GHz, 3yr Warranty
£320 – Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Toxic OC – 3GB, Core Clock 1.1GHz (1,150MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 6.4GHz, 2yr Warranty

Verdict – The 280X cards all come with 3GB of RAM as standard, so you won’t need to make any tricky decisions about memory capacities. However, there’s still a decent range of prices, going from the £260 Powercolor to the highly expensive £320 Sapphire Toxic. In fairness to Sapphire, the Toxic does come with some fantastic specifications, and a 1,150MHz Boost clock and 6.4GHz memory are peerless. At the other end of the scale, the Powercolor comes with very meagre clock speeds, but will still offer the majority of the power, but for £60 less. A good compromise would be the Gigabyte. This offers a 1GHz core clock, with a fantastic Boost to 1.1GHz. Yet it costs just £30 more than the Powercolor.

Specs

nVidia GeForce GTX 770: Specs

  • nVidia GeForce GTX 770
  • 2GB GDDR5
  • 1006MHz core clock (1058MHz Boost)
  • 1.75GHz memory clock (7010MHz DDR effective)
  • 400MHz RAMDAC
  • 256-bit memory interface
  • 1536 stream processors
  • 128 texture units
  • 32 ROP units
  • PCI Express interface
  • DirectX 11
  • 2x DVI, 1x HDMI
  • 1x DisplayPort
  • 1x 6-pin, 1x 8-pin PSU connector needed
  • 3-year warranty

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 770








AMD Radeon R9 280X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 280X on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2048 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 1536 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

AMD Radeon R9 280X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q4 2013

Q2 2013
Model number

215-0821065, Tahiti XTL

GK104-425-A2
GPU name

Tahiti

GK104
Architecture

GCN 1. 0

Kepler
Generation

Volcanic Islands R9 200

GeForce 700
Lithography

28 nm

28 nm
Transistors

4.313.000.000

3.540.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

850 MHz

1,05 GHz
GPU boost clock

1,00 GHz

1,09 GHz
Memory frequency

1.500 MHz

1.753 MHz
Effective memory speed

6 GB/s

7 GB/s
Memory size

3 GB

2 GB
Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR5
Memory bus

384 Bit

256 Bit
Memory bandwidth

288,0 GB/s

224,4 GB/s
TDP

250 W

230 W
Suggested PSU 600W ATX Power Supply 600W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

SLI-ready
Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort

2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort


Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

32

6
Shading units (cuda cores)

2. 048

1.536
TMUs

128

128
ROPs

32

32
Cache memory

768 KB

512 KB
Pixel fillrate

32,0 GP/s

34,7 GP/s
Texture fillrate

128,0 GT/s

138,9 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

4,1 TFLOPS

3,3 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

1,0 TFLOPS

138,9 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 280X

4.096
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

3.333

The difference is 23%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 280AMD Radeon R9 280X2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R9 280X Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 770 AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 270X Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 770 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 770

Check Price

Radeon R9 270X

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 770 Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 180 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors One 8-pin and one 6-pin 2 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 770 has 27% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 270X.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 270X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 770 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 270X — with GCN.
  • GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 35−40 24−27
ultra / 1080p 21−24 14−16
QHD / 1440p 16−18 10−11
4K / 2160p 10−11 6−7
low / 720p 60−65 45−50
medium / 1080p 40−45 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p 55−60 40−45
ultra / 1080p 45−50 30−35
QHD / 1440p 35−40 18−20
4K / 2160p 18−20 10−12
low / 720p 100−110 80−85
medium / 1080p 60−65 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 240−250
medium / 768p 220−230 210−220
ultra / 1080p 180−190 140−150
QHD / 1440p 110−120 110−120
4K / 2160p 70−75 60−65
high / 768p 210−220 180−190
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p 60−65 60−65
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 100−110 90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p 45−50 30−35
ultra / 1080p 40−45 27−30
QHD / 1440p 27−30 21−24
4K / 2160p 14−16 10−11
low / 720p 80−85 60−65
medium / 1080p 45−50 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p 60−65 40−45
ultra / 1080p 45−50 30−35
QHD / 1440p 27−30 18−20
4K / 2160p 27−30
low / 720p 180−190 140−150
medium / 1080p 110−120 85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p 60−65 40−45
ultra / 1080p 45−50 30−35
QHD / 1440p 30−35 18−20
4K / 2160p 24−27 16−18
low / 720p 100−110 80−85
medium / 1080p 65−70 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p 140−150 110−120
medium / 768p 120−130 100−110
high / 1080p 70−75 50−55
ultra / 1080p 30−35 21−24
QHD / 1440p 21−24 10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p 24−27 16−18
ultra / 1080p 20−22 12−14
QHD / 1440p 16−18 12−14
4K / 2160p 8−9 4−5
low / 720p 65−70 45−50
medium / 1080p 30−35 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p 130−140 120−130
medium / 1080p 120−130 110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 100−110 80−85
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p 24−27 18−20
ultra / 1080p 16−18 12−14
QHD / 1440p 10−11 4−5
4K / 2160p 7−8 3−4
low / 720p 65−70 45−50
medium / 1080p 35−40 24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p 130−140 90−95
medium / 768p 85−90 55−60
high / 1080p 45−50 30−35
ultra / 1080p 24−27 18−20
4K / 2160p 16−18 10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 50−55 45−50
high / 768p 60−65 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 270X.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 770 Radeon R9 270X
Architecture Kepler GCN
Code name GK104 Curacao XT
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 30 May 2013 8 October 2013
Pipelines 1536 1280
Core clock speed 1046 MHz
Boost Clock 1085 MHz 1050 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 134 billion/sec 84. 00
Floating-point performance 3,333 gflops 2,688 gflops
Length 10.5″ (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7012 MHz
Memory bandwidth 224.3 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.3 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 +
CUDA +
FreeSync +
CUDA cores 1536
Bus support PCI Express 3. 0 PCIe 3.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support 4 displays
HDMI + +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
3D Vision Live +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 113 Mh/s 318 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
TrueAudio +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 3. 9 Mh/s 30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 163 Sol/s
AppAcceleration +
Blu Ray 3D +
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
Minimum recommended system power 600 Watt
PhysX +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 770 vs FirePro W9000
  • GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 280X
  • Radeon R9 270X vs FirePro W9000
  • Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 280X
  • GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon Sky 500
  • GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 M485X
  • Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon Sky 500
  • Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M485X

0025 3. 48 TFLOPS vs 3.21 TFLOPS

  • 40W below TDP?
    190W vs 230W
  • 1.5x more VRAM?
    3GB vs 2GB
  • 64GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    288GB/s vs 224GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus?
    384bit vs 256bit
  • 512 more stream processors?
    2048 vs 1536
  • 773million more transistors?
    4313 million vs 3540 million
  • 19°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
    63°C vs 82°C
  • Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 better than AMD Radeon R9 280X?

    • GPU frequency 196MHz higher?
      1046MHz vs 850MHz
    • 6.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      33.5 GPixel/s vs 27.2 GPixel/s
    • 253MHz faster memory speed?
      1753MHz vs 1500MHz
    • 1012MHz higher effective clock speed?
      7012MHz vs 6000MHz
    • 25 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
      134 GTexels/s vs 109 GTexels/s
    • 85MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
      1085MHz vs 1000MHz
    • 1171 higher PassMark (G3D) result?
      6289 vs 5118
    • Has DPFP?

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 370X

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX250

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    vs

    MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 280

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    VS

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 TI

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 10504

    VS

    9000 AMD RADEN RADEN0003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX350

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX150

    AMD R9 280X

    AMD Radeon 960

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 380

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Price Match

    User Reviews

    Performance

    1. GPU Clock Speed ​​

    850MHz

    1046MHz

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    1000MHz

    1085MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    27.2 GPixel/s

    33.5 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    3.48 TFLOPS

    3.21 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    109 GTexels/s

    134 GTexels/s

    The number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1500MHz

    1753MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7. shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    6000MHz

    7012MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2. max memory bandwidth

    288GB/s

    224GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    384bit

    256bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

    ✖AMD Radeon R9 280X

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔AMD Radeon R9 280X

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖AMD Radeon R9 280X

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔AMD Radeon R9 280X

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖AMD Radeon R9 280X

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔AMD Radeon R9 280X

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9 280X)

    More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    3rd HDMI version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9280X)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 770)

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5. DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X.

    VS

    General Info

    The General Information section of the Video Card Comparison list provides information on release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and AMD Radeon R9 280X. Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.

    230

    Position in the performance rating

    231

    61.74 9000

    Desktop

    30 May 2013 (8 years ago)

    Release date

    8 October 2013 (8 years ago)

    $399

    Starting price

    $ 299

    $ 211 (0. 5x MSRP)

    Actual price

    $ 330 (1.1x MSRP)

    No data

    Reference

    9000 9000 GPU Code Name

    Thaiti XTL

    Desktop

    Market Segment

    Desktop

    Specifications

    Which graphics card compares better NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs AMD Radeon R9280X in the manufacturing process, power consumption, as well as the base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part contained in the ranking of video cards.

    1536

    004 28 NM

    Technological process

    28 NM

    230 WATT

    Power consumption (TDP)

    250 WATT

    134 Billion/SEC

    The number of texts processed in 1 second

    128.03

    3.33 GFLOPS

    Floating point operations

    4.096 gflops

    98 °C

    Maximum temperature

    n/a

    1536

    CUDA cores

    n/a0003

    1536

    Convers / CUDA Nuclei

    2048

    1085 MHZ

    Acceleration

    1000 MHZ

    3. 540 Million

    Transisters

    4,00000,000

    Dimensions, connectors and compatibility

    Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and AMD Radeon R9 280X graphics cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

    PCIE 3.0 X16

    Interface

    PCIE 3.0 X16

    10.5 ”(26.7 CM)

    length

    275 MM

    One 8-PIN and One 6-PIN

    Additional power

    1 x 6-PIN + 1 x 8-pin

    PCI Express 3.0

    Support for tires

    PCIe 3.0

    4.376 «(11.1 CM)

    Height

    No data

    600 WATT

    minimum recromended SYSTEM

    9000

    Memory (Frequency and Overclocking)

    Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and AMD Radeon R9 280X:

    GDDR5

    0003

    256 BIT

    DISTRUCTION OF Memory bus

    384 BIT

    7012 MHZ

    Memory frequency

    No data

    224. 3 GB/S

    memory capacity

    288 GB/S 9000

    Port and display support

    Let’s find out the difference in ports that NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and AMD Radeon R9 280X graphics cards are equipped with. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.

    One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort

    Display connections

    2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

    +

    G-SYNC support

    N/A

    4 Displays

    Multi Monitor Support

    No data

    +

    HDCP

    No data

    2048×1536

    Maximum VGA

    003

    No data

    No data

    Eyefinity

    +

    +

    HDMI

    +

    No data

    DisplayPort Support

    +

    Let’s see what is the difference. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.

    +

    3D Vision

    n.a.

    +

    GPU Boost

    n. a.0004 No data

    No data

    Appacleration

    +

    No data

    Crossfire

    1

    No data 9000

    1

    n.a.

    PowerTune

    n.a.0004 +

    No data

    Zerocore

    No data

    DDMA Audio

    +

    No data

    ENDURO

    No data

    UVD

    9000 +

    9000 9000 9000 BLU RAY 3D

    No data

    +

    3D Gaming

    No data

    +

    3D Vision Live

    No data

    +

    FXAA

    No data

    9000 9000

    004 +

    TXAA

    No data

    +

    ADAPTIVE VSYNC

    No data

    +

    Physx

    API

    9000 . Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

    12 (11_0)

    9DirectX

    Directx® 12

    4.3

    Opengl

    4.6

    1.1.126

    VULKAN

    +

    5. 1

    Shader Model

    5,0003

    1.2 9000 9000 OPENCL 9000 OPENC

    Mantle

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 versus AMD Radeon R9 280X benchmark comparison

    Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards

    one. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
    2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. AMD Radeon R9 280X
    3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. AMD Radeon RX 560
    four. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
    5. AMD Radeon R9 280X vs. AMD Radeon 540X
    6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. NVIDIA Quadro P5000
    7. NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
    eight. AMD Radeon R9280X vs. AMD FirePro D700
    9. AMD Radeon R9 280X vs. AMD Radeon R7 360
    ten. AMD Radeon R9 280X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
    eleven. AMD Radeon R9 280X vs. AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
    12. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs. AMD Radeon R9 280X
    13. NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
    fourteen. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
    fifteen. AMD Radeon R938MHz

    1046MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    GPU memory frequency

    This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

    1500MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    1753MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326. 6 MHz

    FLOPS

    The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

    4.2TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    3.5TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    Turbo GPU

    If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
    Show all

    1000MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    1085MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    Texture size

    A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
    Show all

    109 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    134 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    Architecture name

    GCN 1.0

    Kepler

    Graphic processor name

    GK104 9000 , from which the device saves or reads information.

    288GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3GB/s

    224.4GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    Effective memory speed

    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
    Show all

    6000MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    7012MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    RAM

    3GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    2GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    GDDR Memory Versions

    Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
    Show all

    5

    Average: 4.5

    5

    Average: 4. 5

    Memory bus width

    A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
    Show all

    384bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    256bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    Date of Release

    2013-10-08 00:00:00

    2013-05-30 00:00:00

    Heat release (TDP)

    Thermal Requirements (TDP)-the maximum possible amount energy dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
    Show all

    250W

    Average: 140. 4W

    230W

    Average: 140.4W

    Process technology

    The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    Number of transistors

    4313 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    3540 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    PCIe version

    Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
    Show all

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    Width

    275mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    267mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    Height

    120mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    111mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    Purpose

    Desktop

    Desktop

    DirectX

    Used in demanding games, providing improved graphics

    12

    max 12. 2

    Average: 11.1

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    OpenCL version

    Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
    Show all

    1.2

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    3

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    opengl version

    Later versions provide better game graphics

    4.6

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    4.6

    max 4. 6

    Average: 4

    Supports FreeSync 9 technology0673

    Yes

    No data

    Shader model version

    5.1

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    5.1

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    Vulkan version

    1.2

    1.1

    Has HDMI output

    HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
    Show all

    Yes

    Yes

    DisplayPort

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

    one

    Average: 2

    one

    Average: 2

    DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI

    2

    Mean: 1. 4

    2

    Mean: 1.4

    Number of HDMI connectors

    The greater the number, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
    Show all

    one

    Average: 1.1

    one

    Average: 1.1

    HDMI

    Yes

    Yes

    Passmark score

    5720

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    5752

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

    51075

    max 1

    Average: 80042. 3

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    7221

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

    8176

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    7987

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU score

    10576

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    max 57937

    Average: 18799. 9

    3DMark Vantage Performance score

    32384

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

    279668

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    Unigine Heaven 3.0 score

    93

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    Unigine Heaven 4.0 test score

    997

    max 4818

    Average: 1291. 1

    1056

    max 4818

    Average: 1291.1

    GeForce GTX 770 still in service! Old video card against new rivals

    Thursday, 15 October 2015

    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

    (2 votes)

    Video cards

    Author

    Alexander

    During our testing of the GeForce GTX 960, the old GeForce GTX 770 video adapter was a regular participant. At one time it was a very successful high-end graphics accelerator, although now it is in the mid-range segment of solutions. At the end of the life of the GeForce GTX 770, we decided to pay a little attention to the old man to find out its capabilities in modern conditions.

    This time we will move away from the usual scheme, when we abstract from specific models. The focus will be on the Gigabyte GTX 770 WindForce 3X (GV-N770OC-2GD) with increased factory frequencies and a standard 2 GB of memory. Note that it was the factory overclocked versions that dominated the market. Some of these video cards are still on sale today.

    280X and Radeon R9 380. Let’s not forget about the comparison with the GeForce GTX 960, although according to the results of past tests, this topic has already been fully disclosed.

    Let’s first study the technical features of the Gigabyte GV-N770OC-2GD.

    The video card was sold in a large box. Inside, additional cables and adapters are placed in a separate compartment. In this case, these are two power adapters from Molex standard connectors to video card power connectors.

    Gigabyte is large. Equipped with a dual-slot WindForce 3X cooling system — the last index indicates the number of fans. Current graphics accelerators are equipped with a similar cooler.

    The Gigabyte GTX 770 has two SLI connectors and two power connectors. Gigabyte’s cooler protrudes slightly beyond the board.

    The cooling system uses six heat pipes. Contact with the graphics chip is made through the copper base. There is an aluminum plate around it, which is in contact with the memory chips through special thermal pads. It is noteworthy that right on the main radiator there is a platform for contact with power transistors. This design of a single heatsink is now used in all high-end Gigabyte graphics solutions.

    At the point of contact with the GPU, metal heatsink fins alternate with thick trapezoidal metal sheets. Together they are pulled together by a pair of powerful bolts. Such a «core» improves the efficiency of heat dissipation and directs air flow.

    Three 80 mm fans are mounted on top of the radiator. They provide complete ventilation of the heatsink and blowing of the entire board.

    Gigabyte GV-N770OC-2GD uses its own design board with a reinforced power system and 8 phases in the GPU voltage converter. This should have a positive effect on stability at higher frequencies.

    The heart of the GeForce GTX 770 is the GK104 processor with all active computing units: 1536 CUDA cores and 128 TMU texture units. In this configuration, users saw the GK104 back in the days of the GeForce GTX 680. Actually, the GeForce GTX 770 is only the heir to the GeForce GTX 680, which switched to higher frequencies. If the old flagship had a base frequency value of 1006 MHz, then its changer had 1045 MHz, and the average Boost Clock increased from 1059 MHz to 1085 MHz.

    The GeForce GTX 770 is equipped with two gigabytes of GDDR5 memory. In the current environment, such a volume can play the role of a limiting factor. Effective memory frequency 7012 MHz (GeForce GTX 680 had 6008 MHz).

    Once again Gigabyte’s frequency characteristics will be illustrated by a screenshot from GPU-Z.

    This utility allows you to determine the ASIC Quality parameter, which our instance has 90.9%. This value indicates the «quality» of the chip and partly characterizes its overclocking capabilities. In this case, everything should be fine.

    The video card is not quiet, but the fan noise during gaming is moderate, there is no particular discomfort. Below is a screenshot of monitoring parameters using the MSI Afterburner utility while running the Metro Last Light benchmark. The GPU temperature reached 73 ° C, the peak speed of the fans at 2500 rpm. The real Boost frequency was stable at 1254 MHz.

    Everything is really good with overclocking, although there were copies of the GeForce GTX 770 with better frequency potential. When using the available softvolt mod, we managed to achieve a stable processor frequency of 1306 MHz with a base value of 1187 MHz.

    Memory overclocking reached 7806 MHz. A slight increase in the speed of the fans allowed us to keep the operating temperatures almost at the initial level.

    In order to test the GeForce GTX 770 at reference frequencies, the base value was lowered to the lowest available level. As a result, Boost was 1137 MHz, which is exactly the same as the characteristics of regular versions of the GeForce GTX 770. But in harsh temperature conditions, Boost for the reference may decrease, while for our video card it was constant. This nuance will minimally affect the results. But with a scrupulous attitude to the results, it can be taken into account.

    Test participants

    The total list of test participants is as follows:

    • GeForce GTX 770 2GB
    • GeForce GTX 960 2GB
    • GeForce GTX 760 2GB
    • Radeon R9 280X 3GB
    • Radeon HD 7970 3GB
    • Radeon R9 380 2GB
    • Radeon R9 285 2GB

    All specifications are shown in the table. For GeForce, the official frequency level is indicated (Base and Boost Clock). The real value of the maximum Boost for test instances is reflected in the final diagrams.

    Gigabyte GTX 770

    GeForce GTX 770

    GeForce GTX 960

    GeForce GTX 760

    Radeon R9 280X

    Radeon HD 7970

    Radeon R9 380

    Radeon R9 285

    GPU codename

    GK104

    GK104

    GM206

    GK104

    Tahiti

    Tahiti

    Antigua

    Tonga

    Number of transistors, million

    3500

    3500

    2940

    3500

    4313

    4313

    5000

    5000

    Technical process, nm

    28

    28

    28

    28

    28

    28

    28

    28

    Core area, sq. mm

    294

    294

    228

    294

    352

    352

    366

    366

    Number of stream processors

    1536

    1536

    1024

    1152

    2048

    2048

    1792

    1792

    Number of texture units

    128

    128

    64

    96

    128

    128

    112

    112

    Number of ROPs

    32

    32

    32

    32

    32

    32

    32

    32

    Core frequency, MHz

    1137/1189

    1045/1085

    1126/1178

    980/1033

    1000

    925

    970

    918

    Memory bus bit

    256

    256

    128

    256

    384

    384

    256

    256

    Memory type

    GDDR5

    GDDR5

    GDDR5

    GDDR5

    GDDR5

    GDDR5

    GDDR5

    GDDR5

    Effective memory frequency, MHz

    7012

    7012

    7012

    6008

    6000

    5500

    5500

    5500

    Memory size, MB

    2048

    2048

    2048

    2048

    3072

    3072

    2048

    2048

    Interface

    PCI-E 3. 0

    PCI-E 3.0

    PCI-E 3.0

    PCI-E 3.0

    PCI-E 3.0

    PCI-E 3.0

    PCI-E 3.0

    PCI-E 3.0

    TDP level, W

    230

    230

    120

    170

    250

    250

    190

    190

    Test bench

    • Processor: Intel Core i7-3930K @4.4GHz
    • motherboard: ASUS Rampage IV Formula
    • Memory: Kingston KHX2133C11D3K4/16GX, 1866MHz, 4x4GB
    • hard drive: Hitachi HDS721010CLA332, 1 TB
    • power supply: Seasonic SS-750KM
    • operating system: Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64
    • GeForce driver: NVIDIA GeForce 353. 06
    • Radeon driver: ATI Catalyst 15.6 and ATI Catalyst 15.7 for R9 380

    Testing was carried out using the settings and parameters described earlier in the GeForce GTX 960 review. The test games are listed in alphabetical order according to their name.

    More in this category:

    « How much video memory is required for GeForce GTX 960? Comparison of 2 and 4 GB video cards

    GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury X in WQHD »

    More in this category:

    « How much video memory is required for the GeForce GTX 960? Comparison of 2 and 4 GB video cards

    GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury X in WQHD »

    Trump cards. Testing high-end video cards

    2013 was rich in new high-end video cards from AMD and Nvidia. Some came out in the first quarter, some at the end of the year. In our test, we collected these models and found out how forces are now distributed between current models and what’s new in fast video cards

    New games traditionally demand more and more performance from video cards. Adding fuel to the fire is the situation when monitors with resolutions higher than Full HD are becoming more and more accessible, models with 4K resolution appear.

    An interesting detail. When it comes to discrete graphics cards, compared to previous years, the popularity of mid-range and high-end graphics cards has grown. This can be explained by the massive “settlement” of integrated video adapters in processors. For those who are not interested in modern games, the built-in video will do. By the way, modern embedded video is becoming more and more advanced. If games are important, then users choose already powerful discrete graphics cards. If you’re going to play, then play.

    Change of generations

    In 2013, a lot of new video cards came out, but in this comparative test, we decided to pay attention to high-end solutions. In our test, we collected both super-new products that are just starting to appear on sale — video cards based on AMD Radeon R9 290, AMD Radeon R9 290X, Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti, and models that were released a year earlier — Nvidia GeForce GTX 760, Nvidia GeForce GTX 770, Nvidia GeForce GTX 780, Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN, AMD Radeon R9280X. The GTX 760 belongs more to the middle class, but the model is very popular and we decided to include it in the test as well.

    What are all these video cards? It can be noted that both the new Nvidia GTX 700 series graphics cards and the AMD Radeon R9 series graphics cards are based on GPUs using the same architecture as their predecessors. Nvidia GTX calls this architecture Kepler, while AMD Radeon calls it Graphics Core Next.

    For ease of comparison and analysis, we have listed the key characteristics of the reference video card models participating in the test in a separate table. The Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 use the GK104 GPU, familiar from the GTX 600 series of video cards, but the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780, Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN, Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti graphics processor is different — larger and more advanced GK110. By the way, this more advanced GPU was “borrowed” from professional Nvidia Tesla graphics accelerators.

    The AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU is identical to the GPU used in the Radeon HD 7000 video cards. If we analyze the characteristics even deeper (GPU and memory frequencies, computational pipelines, etc.), it turns out that the AMD Radeon R9 280X is actually a renamed AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition model. The AMD Radeon R9 290 and AMD Radeon R9 290X, on the other hand, are completely new models with a new, more powerful GPU and new features, which will be discussed below.

    Some Features

    All models listed above support 4K resolution and 60Hz refresh rate. You can easily connect more than two monitors to video cards. By the way, if in AMD video cards of previous generations for such a connection it was necessary that at least one monitor was connected via a DisplayPort connection, now there is no such restriction. Just connect monitors to any free video outputs.

    Nvidia’s GTX 700 and TITAN graphics cards have developed automatic overclocking technology: now the frequency change occurs in a wider range, and more parameters about the state of the video card are analyzed for more flexible operation. The technology is called GPU Boost 2.0.

    In turn, the AMD Radeon R9 290 and AMD Radeon R9 290X models have received the development of AMD PowerTune intelligent power management technology.

    Last spring, mentions began to appear about AMD’s own low-level Mantle API, which you can read more about in a separate insert “API Mantle. More FPS with AMD GPUs.»

    An interesting new feature of AMD Radeon R9 290 and AMD Radeon R9 290X (without AMD Radeon R9 280X) is the TrueAudio audio coprocessor in the GPU, which can be very conveniently used by game and application developers to create surround sound effects

    API Mantle. More FPS with AMD graphics cards

    The Mantle API is a graphics API developed by AMD. It is an alternative to DirectX and OpenGL and allows developers to make more use of the GPU’s capabilities, resulting in better gaming performance. This Mantle API is supported by graphics cards with Graphics Core Nex architecture (AMD Radeon HD 7000 series and newer Radeon R9/R7).

    Unfortunately, the Mantle API is not used anywhere yet. But it is expected that games using it will appear. For example, support for the Mantle API is about to appear in Battlefield 4. According to the manufacturer, using the Mantle API instead of DirectX in this game will allow you to get a 45 percent (!) performance increase (PC configuration is indicated based on an AMD A10-7850K processor and an AMD graphics card Radeon R9290X).

    Characteristics of reference models of AMD/ATI and NVIDIA video cards

    The table shows the standard (reference) characteristics of different video cards, giving some idea of ​​the differences between models in the lines.

    In addition, comparing the data on the frequencies of the graphics processor and video memory in this table and in the table of characteristics of the test participants, one can judge how much one or another manufacturer (Asus, MSI, Palit, etc. ) increased (or did not increase ) frequency of their products compared to the standard ones.

    Summary table of the characteristics of the presented video cards (part 1)

    Summary table of the characteristics of the presented video cards (part 2)

    If you look, the AMD Radeon R9 280X video cards that appeared in the fall of 2013 can hardly be called really new. They are a slightly overclocked version of the AMD Radeon HD 7970, which, by the way, was released more than two years ago. Nevertheless, even by today’s standards, AMD Radeon R9 280X are quite high-performance graphics cards. By the way, AMD Radeon HD 7970 with standard frequencies also takes part in the test and you can see for yourself how much the performance of the R9 280X has increased compared to it.

    Considering that many developments have already been «tested» on the AMD Radeon HD 7970, AMD Radeon R9 280X in most cases are upgraded solutions with proprietary cooling systems. We tested three models of video cards based on AMD Radeon R9 280X: Asus R9280X-DC2T-3GD5, HIS R9 280X iPower IceQ X2 Turbo Boost Clock, MSI R9280X GAMING 3G. All of them are equipped with branded cooling systems, the noise level of which is difficult to claim.

    As for the maximum temperature of the graphics core in games, we recorded a slight advantage on the HIS side, but in general, the maximum GPU temperatures shown for all three video cards can be called quite acceptable.

    If we talk about GPU and memory frequencies, then Asus R9 280X-DC2T-3GD5 turned out to be the leader, which allowed it to bypass its classmates. The frequencies (GPU and memory) of MSI and HIS are identical and practically do not differ from the reference ones.

    The overall performance of solutions based on AMD Radeon R9 280X according to the results of all tests (see histograms) turned out to be approximately comparable to the performance of Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 video cards. If models based on the GTX 770 have increased frequencies, then they show slightly better results.

    In their niche, AMD Radeon R9 280X video cards proved to be worthy. True, a rather ambiguous picture has developed with the cost of these video cards at the time of testing. We have provided some comments on this separately under the histograms of the “Overall estimate/price” category.

    Asus R9 280X-DC2T-3GD5

    Of the trio of AMD Radeon R9 280X-based graphics cards, this model has slightly increased GPU and memory frequencies. R9 280x

    Video memory: 3GB, GDDR5

    Memory Tire: 384 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor/

    Delasser memory: 1070/6400 MHz

    Exits: HDMI, 2XDVI, DisplayPort

    Supplier: Representatives of ASUS

    Price: $ 500

    Assessment:

    slightly faster than other graphics cards based on AMD Radeon R9 280X

    HIS R9 280X iPower IceQ X2 Turbo Boost Clock

    Specifications HIS R9 280X iPower IceQ X2 Turbo Boost Clock

    Video Model: AMD Radeon R9 280x

    Video memory: 3 GB, GDDR5

    Memory Shina: 384 bits

    Maximum frequency of the graphic processor/memory Roof 9000 9000 9000. Outputs: HDMI, DVI, 2x Mini DisplayPort

    Vendor: HIS Representative

    Price: $300

    Rating:

    Rating:

    good performance, quiet +2567

    Price: $350

    Rating:

    + Quiet, good performance

    The graphics cards are based on the new Hawaii XT GPU and should compete with the fastest Nvidia solutions.

    Unfortunately, due to the fact that video cards have only just begun to appear on sale, in our test they are presented in single copies. And HIS R9290 Fan, and HIS R9 290XFan, presented in the test, are essentially a copy of the reference video cards AMD Radeon R9 290 and R9 290X, respectively. GPU and memory frequencies are also absolutely standard for these models.

    Based on the results, the AMD Radeon R9 290 and AMD Radeon R9 290X really deliver excellent performance. The R9 290 easily outpaced even the overclocked Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 and came close to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 graphics cards. The AMD Radeon R9 290X, which is AMD’s fastest single-GPU graphics card, outperformed most of the GTX 780 models in overall performance and was second only to the fastest of them Palit GeForce GTX 780 SUPERJETSTREAM. It failed to outperform solutions based on the GTX 780Ti and GTX TITAN.

    The obtained performance results of HIS R9 290 Fan and HIS R9 290X Fan are very pleasing, but in practice we encountered a number of not very pleasant nuances in the operation of these video cards.

    Reference cooling systems are hardly suitable for these models of video cards. Both video cards become very noisy after a few minutes of operation under load. If for HIS R9 290 Fan the performance of the standard (reference) cooling system is still enough, although the GPU temperature rises to values ​​of more than 90 °С, then it is no longer enough to cool the HIS R9 290X Fan.

    When the HIS R9 290X Fan reaches a GPU temperature of 94 °C, and this happens quite quickly, the GPU frequency starts to decrease, and, accordingly, the performance drops. To avoid such modes of operation, we even had to pause between tests, allowing the video card to cool down.

    An important point: the disadvantages mentioned above apply not only to the HIS R9 290 Fan and HIS R9 290X Fan that we tested, but also to all video cards based on AMD Radeon R9290 and R9 290X, which have a standard reference cooling system.

    In general, if you are not ready to put up with noticeable noise and performance degradation (in the case of the Radeon R9 290X), we recommend waiting until AMD Radeon R9 290/290X based models with modified, more efficient proprietary cooling systems become available. .

    HIS R9 290X Fan. To use AMD CrossFireX mode in the new AMD Radeon R9 290X and AMD Radeon R9 290 graphics cards, you do not need to install additional jumpers between graphics cards

    A special switch allows you to select one of the two BIOS video cards. The differences lie in the different initial limits on the maximum speed of the turbine fan of the cooling system. This is the standard feature of AMD Radeon R9 290x and AMD Radeon R9 290

    Characteristics HIS R9 290X FAN

    Video Card Model: AMD Radeon R9 290x

    Video memory 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 bit

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor/

    Memory Contributant: 1000/5000 MHz

    Exits: HDMI, 2X DVI, DisplayPort

    Supplier: Representing HIS 9,0006 666

    Rating:

    + high performance

    + much of the heated air is expelled outside the computer case

    — Cooling system noisy under load

    — Decreased performance during continuous load operation

    HIS R9 290 Fan. On the external video card, you can’t distinguish from HIS R9 290X FAN

    Characteristics HIS R9 290 FAN

    Video Card Model: AMD Radeon R9 290

    Video Pamamy: 4 GB, GDDR5 9264 9000 : 512 bit

    Nvidia’s Titan is the first Nvidia gaming graphics card to feature the GK110 GPU. Later, based on a similar GPU, the GTX 780 appeared, and then the GTX 780 Ti.

    At the time of its appearance, it easily smashed all existing single-processor video cards on the market. With a planned very limited edition, it was released not to fight for the wallets of buyers, but rather to attract additional attention, to demonstrate its capabilities. A kind of «muscle game» performed by Nvidia.

    The Zotac GeForce GTX TITAN AMP present in our test! Edition has a reference cooling system, but the GPU and memory frequencies are noticeably increased compared to the standard ones (AMP version!).

    We would characterize the noise of the cooling system as average. Zotac GeForce GTX TITAN AMP! Edition is not as noisy as a pair of HIS R9 290X Fan / HIS R9 290 Fan, but not as quiet as video cards with proprietary cooling systems.

    Note that when the GPU temperature reaches 80 °C, which happens in almost all applications, the video card switches from the turbo frequency to the normal one. If you slightly change the fan operation algorithm and make it gain momentum at lower temperatures, you can make the video card run at higher frequencies more often. However, this will increase the noise level.

    A video card based on the GTX TITAN is quite difficult to find on sale, and the cost of such solutions can hardly be called adequate. Today, the GTX TITAN successfully replaces the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti.

    Zotac GeForce GTX TITAN AMP! Edition uses an absolutely standard reference cooling system for GTX TITAN

    Features Zotac GeForce GTX TITAN AMP! Edition

    Video card model: Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN

    Video memory: 6 GB, GDDR5

    Memory bus: 386 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum frequency of the graphic processor in games)/

    Rual memory: 954 (1045)/ 668)/ 668 MHz

    Outputs: HDMI, 2X DVI, DisplayPort

    Vendor: Zotac Res. 2567

    + High performance

    + Part of the heated air is excreted outside the computer

    — not the quietest cooling system

    — high cost

    of the video card on the basis of the GeForce GTX 760, as it is, as it is, for mid-range graphics cards. According to the results of performance tests, they were predictably at the end of the list. But if you look at the “Overall score/price” histograms, they are already among the test leaders. Higher-end graphics cards are faster, of course, but the cost of each FPS gets more and more expensive.

    The GeForce GTX 760 is a smart choice if you need a fairly fast accelerator without the sky-high price tag.

    Gainward GeForce GTX 760 2GB is completely identical in design, cooling system, and frequencies to the reference Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 model. Compared to other participants equipped with upgraded cooling systems, it is not so quiet under load. For its money, by the way, this is the most affordable video card in the test, Gainward GeForce GTX 760 2GB looks good, but the difference compared to other, more advanced «classmates» is not so great.

    Palit GeForce GTX 760 JETSTREAM has the highest memory frequency in the GeForce GTX 760 test. However, models with higher GPU frequencies turned out to be slightly faster. The video card is equipped with a quiet proprietary cooling system. In general, it turned out to be a very nice balanced video card.

    Gigabyte GV-N760OC-2GD proprietary cooling system has three fans at once. It is somewhat unexpected to see such a design in this class of video cards. The solution turned out to be very effective, the video card is very quiet in operation, and the maximum temperature of the graphics core was the lowest among other GTX 760 video cards in our test.

    The Gigabyte GV-N760OC-2GD is nearing the top spot in the Overall Score/Price category (beyond only the HIS R9 280X iPowerIceQ X2 Turbo Boost Clock, which has some questionable pricing), and we’re awarding it our Editors’ Choice badge in the Economy category. Gigabyte GV-N760OC-2GD is a high-quality fast video card with an attractive price.

    Gainward GeForce GTX 760 2GB. You can’t call a noisy video card, but it’s not as quiet as other “classmates” with modified cooling systems

    Memory bus: 256 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum graphic processor frequency in games)/Memory resulting: 1137 (1202)/6200 MHz

    Outpit: HDMI, 2XDVI, DISPLAYPORT Vendor: Palit Representative

    Price: $277

    Rating:

    + increased GPU and memory frequencies

    + quiet operation

    Supplier: MTI, MTI.UA

    Price: $ 280

    Estimation:

    + In memory of

    + Silent work 9,000 N. . In addition to having the highest GPU frequency and highest performance of any GTX 760 in our test, it boasts a host of interesting features.

    Traditionally for the HAWK series, the video card is specially prepared for overclocking. This also lies in the significantly redesigned board design with power subsystem amplification, the ability to change the voltage of three components at once (GPU/Memory/PLL). Of course, a proprietary cooling system is used here with some margin for heat removal during overclocking. The board also provides special pads for manual control of GPU / Memory / PLL voltage using a voltmeter.

    As already mentioned, the MSI N760 HAWK outperforms other GTX 760 models, but due to its relatively high cost, we can recommend it if you are going to overclock it. For enthusiasts, this is indeed a very interesting option, and we decided to honor this graphics card with our Editors’ Choice badge in the Design category.

    MSI N760 HAWK

    The video card has two BIOS. One is designed for normal operation of the video card, and the second is for extreme overclocking

    The board has special pins that allow you to manually measure the GPU/Memory/PLL voltage with a voltmeter.

    Pay attention to the power connectors of this video card. A pair of standard 6-pin connectors have been replaced with a more powerful pair of 8-pin ones. Calculation for significantly increased power consumption during serious overclocking

    Specifications MSI N760 HAWK

    Video card model: Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    Video memory: 2 GB, GDDR5

    Memory bus: 256 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum frequency of the graphic processor in games)/

    Memory Content: 1176 (1267)/ 6008 MHz

    , 2x, 2x, 2x DVI, DisplayPort

    Vendor: MSI Rep.

    Price: $320

    Rating:

    + increased GPU frequencies 0003

    + quiet operation

    + special preparation of the video card for overclocking

    — relatively high cost

    Somewhere the increase in frequency was insignificant, as in the case of the MSI N770 TF 2GD5 / OC (GeForceGTX 770 GAMING), somewhere a little more (Palit GeForce GTX 770 JETSTREAM, Zotac GeForce GTX 770 AMP! Edition).

    All three video cards are equipped with very efficient and quiet proprietary cooling systems. It is curious that the maximum temperature of the GPU

    in games turned out to be approximately the same.

    It is rather difficult to recommend any specific model from those presented. They are close in characteristics and almost do not differ in cost.

    Overall performance histograms show GTX 770 results next to AMD Radeon R9 results2566 Video memory: 2 GB, GDDR5

    Memory bus: 256 bits

    HDMI, 2X DVI, DisplayPort

    Vendor: Palit Representative

    Price: $366

    Rating:

    + increased GPU frequencies

    + Quiet

    Zotac GeForce GTX 770 AMP! Edition

    Features Zotac GeForce GTX 770 AMP! Edition

    The video card model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

    Video memory: 2 GB, GDDR5

    Memory Shin: 256 bits

    Maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum processor 9The 290X Fan, which represents the AMD Radeon R9 290 in our test, is an absolutely standard graphics card, while the GeForce GTX 780-based cards in our test are advanced models with increased frequencies.

    Of the trio of MSI N780 TF 3GD5/OC (GeForce GTX 780 GAMING), Asus ROG POSEIDON-GTX780-P-3GD5, Palit GeForce GTX 780 SUPERJETSTREAM based on Nvidia GeForce GTX 780, the fastest in our test was Palit GeForce GTX 780 SUPERJETSTREAM . She, in fact, has the highest frequencies. In terms of overall performance, she even managed to get ahead of HIS R9290X Fan (AMD Radeon R9 290X).

    We had no complaints about the performance of all three video cards. Proprietary cooling systems do their job well and without much noise, the maximum temperature of the GPU in games is in the safe zone.

    MSI N780 TF 3GD5/OC (GeForce GTX 780 GAMING)

    Characteristics MSI N780 TF 3GD5/OC (GeForce GTX 780 Gaming)

    Video GTX 780 Model: Nvidia GTXE0003

    Video memory: 3 GB, GDDR5

    Memory Tire: 386 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum frequency of the graphic processor in games)/

    Causal memory: 954 (1019)/ 6008 (1019)/ 6008 (1019)/ 6008)

    Outputs: HDMI, 2XDVI, DisplayPort

    Vendor: Representative MSI

    Price: $555

    Rating: 0004 + increased frequencies GPU

    + quiet work

    Palit GeForce GTX 780 Super JetStream

    Palit GTX 780 SUPER JETSTREAM, as well as Series in our tests in our tests. operating time

    Characteristics Palit GeForce GTX 780 SUPER JETSTREAM

    Video card model: Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

    Video memory: 3 GB, GDDR5

    Memory bus: 386 bit

    Maximum GPU frequency (fixed maximum GPU frequency in games)/memory resulting: 1033 (1084)/6008 MHz

    Supplier: Rep. Palit

    Price: $559

    Rating:

    + increased GPU frequencies

    2567

    I would like to dwell on the Asus ROG POSEIDON-GTX 780-P-3GD5 model in more detail. This video card belongs to Asus ROG (Republic of Gamers) series special products, it has an enhanced power supply system, as well as a hybrid cooling system. A liquid channel has been drawn through the diffuser plate, and if necessary, the cooling efficiency of a video card can be significantly increased by connecting it to a liquid cooling system. An unusual, very interesting decision, for which we decided to award the video card with our Editors’ Choice sign in the Design category.

    Asus ROG POSEIDON-GTX780-P-3GD5

    If desired, the GPU can also be cooled with liquid. For this, a special channel is provided in the hybrid cooling system. At the inlet and outlet of the channel, a G1/4 thread is used. Finding the right water tube fitting should be easy

    ROG logo pulsing red during operation

    Specifications Asus ROG POSEIDON-GTX780-P-3GD5

    Graphics card model: Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

    Video memory: 3 GB, GDDR5

    Memory Shin: 386 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum frequency of the graphic processor in games)/memory resulting: 1007 (1097)/6008 MHz 9000 Outputs: HDMI, 2X DVI, DisplayPort

    Vendor: Asus Rep.

    Price: $700

    Rating:

    overclocked GPU4 950 9662567

    + quiet operation

    + interesting hybrid cooling system

    — high cost

    Nvidia has released its flagship Nvidia GeForce R9 video card as if in response to the appearance of the AMD Radeon R9 290. Along with the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 and Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN models, it is built on the Nvidia GK110 GPU, but compared to the GTX 780 and GTX TITAN, it has the largest number of shader processors and texture units, and also has higher GPU and memory frequencies (see .separate table with characteristics).

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti representatives in our test, namely MSI GTX 780 Ti GAMING 3G, Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 780 Ti HerculeZ X3 Ultra and Zotac GeForce GTX 780 Ti AMP! Edition took all the top spots in the Performance category, beating both the AMD Radeon R9 290X and the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN. True, each FPS with these video cards is expensive. In the «Overall Score/Price» category, these cards are already at the bottom.

    Please note that we tested not ordinary video cards, but “pumped” ones by MSI, Inno3D and Asus, respectively. All of them have increased GPU frequencies, and Zotac and Inno3D also have increased memory frequencies. Nevertheless, it was the MSI GTX 780Ti GAMING 3G that turned out to be the fastest among them, including the entire test. Therefore, it was the MSI GTX 780Ti GAMING 3G that we awarded our Editors’ Choice badge, even though it was ahead of the Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 780Ti HerculeZ X3 Ultra and Zotac GeForce GTX 780 Ti AMP! very little.

    In video cards of this class, manufacturers often offer interesting additions to the bundle. For example, with the Zotac GeForce GTX 780Ti AMP! comes with a key to activate the Splinter Cell series of games, and together with the Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 780Ti HerculeZ X3 Ultra you get a game pad and a 3DMark advanced edition activation key.

    We have no complaints about the noise level for all three video cards. Proprietary cooling systems work quite quietly, but do not forget that the power consumption and heat dissipation of these video cards is quite high. By the way, there are differences in the maximum GPU temperature reached in our conditions. The “warmest” result was MSI (72 °C). At Zotac, we recorded a maximum temperature of 66 ° C, and Inno3D with its three 9-centimeter fans simply surprised me with the maximum GPU temperature of 58 °C. True, the Inno3D cooling system turned out to be quite large. The graphics card takes not two, like other GTX 780 Ti graphics cards in our test, but three expansion slots. Having studied the video card in detail, we found some more interesting features. Under the luminous overlay, the image on which, by the way, can be changed, there is a hex key! for partial disassembly of the cooling system and a special jumper. If we understood correctly from the description on the manufacturer’s website, it allows you to control fans bypassing the speed controller. Such curious solutions of Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 780Ti HerculeZ X3 Ultra we would like to mark with our Editors’ Choice sign in the Design category.

    Outputs: HDMI, 2X DVI, DisplayPort

    Supplier: Representative MSI

    Price: $ 820

    Estimates:

    6

    + Quiet

    Zotac GeForce GTX 780 Ti AMP! Edition

    Specs Zotac GeForce GTX 780 Ti AMP! Edition

    Video card model: Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

    Video memory: 3 GB, GDDR5

    Memory Shin: 386 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum frequency of the graphic processor in games)/memory resulting: 1072 (1111)/7000 MHz 9000 Outputs: HDMI, 2X DVI, DisplayPort

    Vendor: Zotac Rep.

    Price: $860

    Rating:

    Rating:

    increased GPU and

    frequencies2567

    + Quiet

    Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 780Ti HerculeZ X3 Ultra. The cooling system made me very happy with its efficiency, but the video card with it turned out to be quite large and occupies three slots

    A hexagon is fixed under the plastic cover, which can be used to partially disassemble the board

    Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 780Ti HerculeZ X3 Ultra

    video cards: Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

    Video memory: 3 GB, GDDR5

    Memory Shin: 386 bits

    The maximum frequency of the graphic processor (fixed maximum frequency of the graphic processor in games)/ Course memory: 1072 (1150)/ 7000)/ 7000 (1150)/ 7000)/ 7000)/ 7000)

    Outputs: HDMI, 2XDVI, DisplayPort

    Supplier: Trinity Ukraine, trinity.kiev.ua

    Price: $830

    Rating: 2567

    + increased frequencies of GPU and memory

    + Quiet work

    + a number of unusual branded features

    — three slots

    for video cards used the latest at the time of the District Testing (NVIDIA GEFIA and AMD AMD Catalyst 13. 12).

    The test applications were synthetic benchmarks 3DMark 11 version 1.0.5 (Extreme preset), 3DMark version 1.2.250 with Cloud Gate and Fire Strike tests, as well as Sniper Elite V2, Metro: Last Light, Sleeping dogs, Tomb Raider 2013, Total War: Rome II. The games used maximum or close to maximum graphics quality settings with resolutions of 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 pixels. When calculating the overall performance, synthetic tests and gaming tests at different resolutions had the same weight.

    We also measured the maximum temperature of the GPU in games and the maximum power consumption of the system (the entire test system, not a single video card) when installing different video cards.

    Histograms are normalized as a percentage with models sorted by test results. Specific results in terms of scores and FPS are also listed.

    Please note that the histograms in the «Overall Score/Price» category are based on the prices reported by device vendors for this test.

    2022 © All rights reserved