Gtx 780 vs 1650: Nvidia GTX 1650 vs 780

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Graphics cards Comparison

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTX 1650

Check Price

GeForce GTX 780

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 780
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 780 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 780.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 780 — with Kepler.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 is 622 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 780 — by 28 nm process technology.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 is 219 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 780.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 40−45 40−45
ultra / 1080p 24−27 27−30
QHD / 1440p 20−22 21−24
4K / 2160p 10−12 10−12
low / 720p 65−70 65−70
medium / 1080p 45−50 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
high / 1080p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 55−60 55−60
QHD / 1440p 40−45 40−45
4K / 2160p 20−22 21−24
low / 720p 110−120 110−120
medium / 1080p 70−75 70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Battlefield 5 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 0−1 8−9
GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 220−230 220−230
ultra / 1080p 190−200 190−200
QHD / 1440p 120−130 130−140
4K / 2160p 75−80 85−90
high / 768p 210−220 210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
low / 768p 60−65 60−65
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 100−110 100−110
GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 50−55 50−55
ultra / 1080p 45−50 45−50
QHD / 1440p 30−35 30−35
4K / 2160p 16−18 16−18
low / 720p 85−90 90−95
medium / 1080p 50−55 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Far Cry 5 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
high / 1080p 65−70 70−75
ultra / 1080p 50−55 55−60
QHD / 1440p 30−35 30−35
4K / 2160p 27−30 27−30
low / 720p 190−200 190−200
medium / 1080p 120−130 120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Fortnite is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
high / 1080p 65−70 65−70
ultra / 1080p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 35−40 35−40
4K / 2160p 24−27 27−30
low / 720p 110−120 110−120
medium / 1080p 70−75 75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
low / 768p 140−150 140−150
medium / 768p 130−140 130−140
high / 1080p 75−80 80−85
ultra / 1080p 35−40 35−40
QHD / 1440p 24−27 27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Grand Theft Auto V is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
high / 1080p 27−30 27−30
ultra / 1080p 21−24 24−27
QHD / 1440p 18−20 18−20
4K / 2160p 10−11 10−11
low / 720p 75−80 75−80
medium / 1080p 35−40 40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Metro Exodus is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
low / 768p 130−140 130−140
medium / 1080p 120−130 130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 110−120 110−120
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p 27−30 27−30
ultra / 1080p 18−20 18−20
QHD / 1440p 12−14 12−14
4K / 2160p 8−9 9−10
low / 720p 75−80 75−80
medium / 1080p 40−45 40−45
GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p 140−150 150−160
medium / 768p 95−100 95−100
high / 1080p 50−55 55−60
ultra / 1080p 27−30 30−35
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 1650.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 780
Architecture Turing Kepler
Code name TU117 GK110
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 23 April 2019 23 May 2013
Pipelines 896 2304
Core clock speed 1485 MHz 863 MHz
Boost Clock 1665 MHz 900 MHz
Transistor count 4,700 million 7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 93. 24 160.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 4,156 gflops
Length 229 mm 10.5″ (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 288.4 GB/s
Shared memory
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 6.5 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.3
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
CUDA 7. 5 +
CUDA cores 2304
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support 4 displays
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
3D Vision Live +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 252 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 18. 5 Mh/s
Blu Ray 3D +
Minimum recommended system power 600 Watt
PhysX +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 780 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 780 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI
  • GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 470
  • GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI
  • GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon RX 470

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    117%

  • GeForce GTX 780

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650
17% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 780
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (4 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 780
GPU Name TU107 () vs GK110 (GK110-300-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 0 mm² vs 561 mm²
Transistors unknown vs 7,080 million
Shaders 896 vs 2304
Compute Units 14 vs 12
Core clock 1485 MHz vs 863 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 48
TMUs 56 vs 192

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 780
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 384 bit
Memory Speed 2000 MHz

8000 MHz effective
vs 1502 MHz


6008 MHz effective
Memory Size 4096 Mb vs 3072 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 780
TDP 0 watts vs 250 watts
Release Date 30 Apr 2019 vs 23 May 2013
  • GeForce GTX 1650

    53. 28 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 780

    41.40 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    93.24 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 780

    166.00 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    128.00 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 780

    288.00 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    2984.00 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 780

    3977.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    77

  • GeForce GTX 780

    68

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    51

  • GeForce GTX 780

    39

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    49

  • GeForce GTX 780

    47

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    35

  • GeForce GTX 780

    29

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 570
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 780 GeForce GTX TITAN
VS
GeForce GTX 780 Radeon R9 380X
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 580 2048SP
VS
Radeon RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580X

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.