Gtx 960 g1 gaming review: Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 Gaming 2 GB Review

GIGABYTE GTX 960 G1 Gaming Physical Review and Overclocking

JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.

16608
Views

19
Replies

11
Participants

Last post by 
wantworld, 

Jump to Latest

Sin0822
Discussion starter
·

The NVIDIA GTX 960 was released today and GIGABYTE is offering up a nice lineup of GTX 960 iterations; today I get hands on with the GTX 960 G1 Gaming edition. This is GIGABYTE?s to overclock edition and the GPU core is binned according to GIGABYTE?s ?GPU Gauntlet Sorting?. They are also strengthening the VRM by doubling the amount of phases, equipping the card with a WINDFORCE 3X cooler, introducing a new Fan Stop mode, and showing off a new ?Flex Display? technology.

http://imageshack.com/i/exTGMpeCj
The new GTX 960 features 2GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus. This makes sense as memory density has increased memory buses have become smaller because the number of memory chips has decreased due to increase density (going from 256MB chips on GTX 700 series to 512MB chips on the GTX 900 series). NVIDIA has also improved their memory compression with their 3rd generation delta color compression. Memory bandwidth is 112 GBps which is determined by bus width and memory speed, NVIDIA says that with their improved memory compression the effective bandwidth is as high as 149 GBps. Maxwell?s improved memory architecture with enhanced compression algorithms and caching effectiveness, should improve memory bandwidth by 25%, that is how 112 GBps becomes 149 GBps. There are a ton of reviews out there already, and this isn’t a full fledged GTX 960 review (mainly b/c i don’t have to compare against), so I will focus more on the hardware and features of this card and overclocking performance.

Specs:
http://imageshack.com/i/pcoBnCtcp
The Core base clock is 114 MHz higher (1241 MHz) than the standard of 1127 MHz and the boost is 126 MHz higher (1304 MHz) than the stock of 1178 MHz. The card also features six display outputs.

http://imageshack.com/i/exINUlQPj
The box is simple.

http://imageshack.com/i/pbNHGAygj
There are two 6-pin PCI-E power adapter cables, the card has two 6-pin power sockets.

http://imageshack.com/i/pbxwVDVbj
I am a fan of back plates, and I applaud its addition here as GIGABYTE usually doesn?t use backplates.

http://imageshack.com/i/eyjKHu5ej
This is the WINDFORCE 3X cooler, which is very impressive. The fans unique blades to improve airflow, 4x6mm copper heatpipes move heat away from the core, and the cooler has a 300W thermal load capacity. Since this cooler is very hefty for this card, there is a semi-passive mode in which the fans will automatically stop.
If you ramp up by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature stays below 62C the fans will not start.
If you ramp by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature goes over 62c, the fans will stop when the GPU goes back below 43C.

http://imageshack.com/i/ipS219pwj
These are the GPU outputs.

http://imageshack.com/i/p9R8kPUAj
The core and the heatpipes make direct contact and you can see that the contact is tight and the imprint of the heatpipes on the thermal paste on the card is evident. The VRM also has its own cooling which seems to be more than adequate.

http://imageshack.com/i/ex7tUbgFj
This is the GPU PCB top.

http://imageshack.com/i/eyJTECu6j
GPU PCB bottom.

http://imageshack.com/i/f0saIi86j
This is the Maxwell core and its surrounding memory chips. The memory is Samsung 512MB modules and is 7010MHz stock. GIGABYTE doesn?t overclock the memory by default. You will notice an empty pad, perhaps there is another version to come later on and the GTX 960 shares the same PCB.

http://imageshack.com/i/p8dUbJ4tj
The VRM is made up of 6 phases opposed to the standard 3. This should offer much better overclocks than the stock 3-phase VRM. Each phase is made up of a Rensas RJK03B7 high-side MOSFET and two RJK0393 which are the low-side MOSFETs. These are PowerPAKs that are common on motherboards, and they should do fine here. The VRM is capable of 160W output according to GIGABYTE.

http://imageshack.com/i/p8XIUYgcj
Here GIGABYTE is using the specified ON Semiconductor NCP81174 which is a 4 phase PWM, however to get 6 phases, only 3 phases are used and doubled by three NCP81162 which output to 6 drivers which seems to be from Richtek. This VRM is basically twice the power phases as the reference card, and it should fair very well, especially with the hefty WINDFORCE cooler cooling it down directly.

http://imageshack.com/i/exIlEpiaj
The memory is powered by a single phase VRM powered by a NCP5239, which is a single phase PWM with integrated drivers. The MOSFETs are in the same configuration as the GPU Core VRM.

http://imageshack.com/i/idmebKxMj
The GIGABYTE GTX 960 G1 Gaming features dual BIOS ROMs in-case you damage one overclocking.

http://imageshack.com/i/ideGrFfJj
These two Pericom PI3WVR124 are high speed HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.2 switches.

http://imageshack.com/i/p7iRFhw5j
The Texas Instruments INA3221 is a 3 channel high current bus and voltage monitor, which is no doubt in charge of monitoring power distribution to the GPU.

Overclocking:
I decided to give GIGABYTE’s OC Guru a try, and the program has most settings you might want for overclocking

http://imageshack.com/i/idAhswJbp
To increase power limits you need to tell the program to focus on temperature and take the max temperature to 95c to get power limits to increase over 100%. If you want to increase the core voltage you need to use the offset and boot it to +0.100v. I was able to get much higher clocks, with boosts in the 1600 for the core, but scores were lower.

http://imageshack.com/i/p8pG7nXep
I liked 1300MHz on the Core, with 1363Mhz boost, and 1763Mhz for the memory. It’s just a slight memory bump to ensure stability and longevity. Even with the increase in power, temperature, and voltage the fans still kept silent and temperatures never went over 71C which is great.

Setup:

I used this setup:
Intel 5960X
GIGABYTE X99-Gaming 5
GIGABYTE GTX 960 G1 Gaming and AMD R9 270X
G.Skill 3200MHz memory (at stock)
Enermax 1000W Platimax
Crucial C300
Noctua NH-D15

Fans off due to low GPU activity:
http://imageshack.com/i/idR2QVJpp

Fans on:
http://imageshack.com/i/pdRF0E7Bp
The fan feature to turn off all fans is a nice touch, although the card is silent at all times and having the fans running wouldn’t create much noise.

Quick Benchmarks with overclocking at [email protected]:
3DMark11:

UNIGINE Heaven 4.0
http://imageshack.com/i/ipmCStdMp
Resident Evil Benchmark

Conclusion:
The card is a well cooled and powered GTX 960. The heatsink does its job, and the entire time I was using it and even while overclocked, the fans were basically silent. A few times I touched the heatsink to see if it was being cooled, and it was never more than a bit warm to the touch. The card is very nice, core clocks are very high and they can overclock high, the memory doesn’t OC that high though.

http://imageshack.com/i/exTGMpeCj
I was very impressed with the card and cooler specifically. I had never had a GPU run so silent yet perform. Every time I put a GPU in and I go to play BFBC2 I can hear it, but not with this card. The core is definitely binned and the VRM does a great job of keeping up with the demand. However this is a mid to upper level card, and as such it isn’t going to eat a lot of power or generate a lot of heat, but at the same time it is meant for gaming at 1080P. If you want to go to higher resolutions you should probably look at a GTX 970 or GTX 980. The GTX 960 G1 Gaming is great for those who want a mid-range graphics card. While the price is $229, it isn’t very far away from other GTX 960 contenders. NVIDIA cards are more expensive in general, and since this is still part of the GTX 900 series family, its recency adds to its premium. However for that price GIGABYTE is giving you one heck of a card, with a great cooler.
If you guys would like I can run more benchmarks, but for now I only have a R9 270X and the GTX 960, I should have some GTX 980s soon to add and expand the number of benchmarks.

See less

See more

25

Reply

Save

Like

1 — 20 of 20 Posts

That’s one heck of a cooler for a 960! lol. I like the lights on each side of the «Windforce» led too.

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sin0822

……

If you ramp up by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature stays below 62C the fans will not start.
If you ramp by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature goes over 62c, the fans will stop when the GPU goes back below 43C.

…….

Click to expand…

Slight typo but overall very good review!

Beastly cooler for an otherwise underwhelming card.

love the LED’s that go on when the fans are on idle!

Reply

Save

Like

fixed! thanks guys!

Reply

Save

Like

Nicely done. Can you post the BIOS here? I’d like to take a look at it.

Reply

Save

Like

Sure here you go:

N960G1GAMING-2GD.zip 136k .zip file
. Also I updated the 270X scores, only 3d11 and RE were affected b/c I had used an outdated driver, new driver brought huge improvements to the 270x score

  • N960G1GAMING-2GD.zip

    136.5 KB
    Views: 57

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sin0822

Sure here you go:

N960G1GAMING-2GD. zip 136k .zip file
. Also I updated the 270X scores, only 3d11 and RE were affected b/c I had used an outdated driver, new driver brought huge improvements to the 270x score

Click to expand…

Thanks. I noticed that the default voltage is far lower than it is on a GTX 980/970. I did mod it to 1.281V if you want to try it see if you can overclock it further with better stability:

N960G1GAMING-2GD-Mod.zip 176k .zip file

  • N960G1GAMING-2GD-Mod.zip

    176.2 KB
    Views: 92

Reply

Save

Like

Nice review, what I was hoping for though was you’d show there was something special in the G1 Gaming that we could «tune» because I have the 970s

Anyhow, question.

Over here the price range of the 960 is ~$290 for the Galax up to $360 for the G1 Gaming. Compare that to the AMD range, you get 280s for $270 and 280Xs from $330 up to $350. Shouldn’t you include both of these cards in the benchmark section also (unless of course you only have the 270X).

NOTE: I have no idea how AMD cards compare to each other.

See less

See more

1

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyclops

Thanks. I noticed that the default voltage is far lower than it is on a GTX 980/970. I did mod it to 1.281V if you want to try it see if you can overclock it further with better stability:

N960G1GAMING-2GD-Mod.zip 176k .zip file

Click to expand…

Thanks! I will give it a shot.
Quote:

Originally Posted by error-id10t

Nice review, what I was hoping for though was you’d show there was something special in the G1 Gaming that we could «tune» because I have the 970s

Anyhow, question.

Over here the price range of the 960 is ~$290 for the Galax up to $360 for the G1 Gaming. Compare that to the AMD range, you get 280s for $270 and 280Xs from $330 up to $350. Shouldn’t you include both of these cards in the benchmark section also (unless of course you only have the 270X).

NOTE: I have no idea how AMD cards compare to each other.

Click to expand…

I actually only have these two cards ATM that i can bench

But I would have liked to toss in the 280X and the 285.. I think the price of the G1 gaming is mainly due to the cooler and the upgraded VRM, the card runs basically silent even when OCed and running at full load which is really nice.

See less

See more

1

Reply

Save

Like

Great review

I love mine, it looks amazing, runs silent and kicks some serious ass @ ~$200 for 1080p gaming. I keep seeing the interweb trolls harping on about 2gb, 128bit, whine whine blah blah but at the end of the day, this thing is literally 200% the performance of the old HD 5850 I replaced with it. Considering the 5850 was still playing everything I threw at it @1080p, albeit at lowered settings, the 960 is a significant upgrade, did not break my bank balance and runs on less power than my 5850 that was, in its day, super efficient. I think a lot of people fail to realize that once you reach a bracket where the GPU is consistently churning out 60+ fps at the target resolution there is absolutely 0 point in spending $100+ more for another 10 — 20 fps unless you plan to upgrade your monitor and game at a higher resolution in the near future or, you are on a long upgrade cycle and want to be sure your purchase will be good for the next 2 — 5 years. The 960 is more than adequate for my needs and delivers everything I expected it would. Not to mention it beats out even the mighty 770 when I overclock it.

Most of the trolls out there have never tested and do not own one of these and thus have no business spewing technical specs and siting an R9 280 is better because a spec sheet says so. The tech in these new maxwells is a huge step up considering its on the same fab as the 700 series cards yet delivers huge performance and efficiency gains. Spec sheets don’t cover optimizations or real world performance. by troll logic my 5850 would be a better card than the 960 if it had another gb of ram on it lol.

See less

See more

1

Reply

Save

Like

I saw this review on a dutch website
Overclock results.
The scores are about the same on my r9 290x lol and it uses twice as less energy
How did that happen.
They report seeing boostclock 1600mhz+

http://nl.hardware.info/reviews/5906/10/geforce-gtx-960-vergelijkingstest-deel-2-asus-evga-gigabyte-inno3d-msi-en-zotac-getest-overklokken

See less

See more

2

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by revengeyo

I saw this review on a dutch website
Overclock results.
The scores are about the same on my r9 290x lol and it uses twice as less energy
How did that happen.
They report seeing boostclock 1600mhz+

http://nl.hardware.info/reviews/5906/10/geforce-gtx-960-vergelijkingstest-deel-2-asus-evga-gigabyte-inno3d-msi-en-zotac-getest-overklokken

Click to expand…

compare the graphics scores . . .

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8776470

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

I think a lot of people fail to realize that once you reach a bracket where the GPU is consistently churning out 60+ fps at the target resolution there is absolutely 0 point in spending $100+ more for another 10 — 20 fps

Click to expand…

The 960 and 970 are the same performance/£ here — the price difference is pretty much exactly the same as the performance difference, around 1.65x — so it’s just a matter of how much VRAM you need, and how much performance you want. For 1080p60 it’s easier to shoot lower. A single 960 will hold 1080p60 more easily than a single 980 will hold 1080p144

Reply

Save

Like

I am running at 1080p and have 2 EVGA GTX960’s in SLI and love em. I know it’s probably overkill but I bought the 2 of them for aesthetics so I can have matching cards in my rig.

See less

See more

1

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyro999

The 960 and 970 are the same performance/£ here — the price difference is pretty much exactly the same as the performance difference, around 1. 65x — so it’s just a matter of how much VRAM you need, and how much performance you want. For 1080p60 it’s easier to shoot lower. A single 960 will hold 1080p60 more easily than a single 980 will hold 1080p144

Click to expand…

Totally agree, I am looking forward to seeing the difference 4gb makes to 960s.

Current gen consoles are sporting upper Radeon R7 spec GPUs which I guess you can consider to be roughly on par with R9 270x/R9 280 with the low level API console developers have access to. That means that most games will run great on systems with cards in this price/performance bracket until the next generation of consoles is released with the major drawback being VRAM seeing as both the XBone and PS4 have access to far more than mid tier GPUs. Games are already starting to step up graphically to the newer console specs, sadly that does not seem to be making them any less boring to play with all the focus still going into EPeen stroking all the multiplayer junkes and teens out there that only really care about maximum graphical awesomeness + blisteringly fast FPS. Games are so stale these days I only usually ever have 1 or 2 installed these days, so much so I am wondering if I shouldn’t have just gotten an R7 260 and an i5 4690k instead of my 960/g3258. Maybe I am just getting to old for games

Still, the 960/R9 280 — 280x to me seem to be the sweet spot for 1080p and lower and I suspect once pricing settles on the new/upcoming 4gb 960s, they will become a more competitive product in this bracket.

See less

See more

1

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaltar

Totally agree, I am looking forward to seeing the difference 4gb makes to 960s.

Current gen consoles are sporting upper Radeon R7 spec GPUs which I guess you can consider to be roughly on par with R9 270x/R9 280 with the low level API console developers have access to. That means that most games will run great on systems with cards in this price/performance bracket until the next generation of consoles is released with the major drawback being VRAM seeing as both the XBone and PS4 have access to far more than mid tier GPUs. Games are already starting to step up graphically to the newer console specs, sadly that does not seem to be making them any less boring to play with all the focus still going into EPeen stroking all the multiplayer junkes and teens out there that only really care about maximum graphical awesomeness + blisteringly fast FPS. Games are so stale these days I only usually ever have 1 or 2 installed these days, so much so I am wondering if I shouldn’t have just gotten an R7 260 and an i5 4690k instead of my 960/g3258. Maybe I am just getting to old for games

Still, the 960/R9 280 — 280x to me seem to be the sweet spot for 1080p and lower and I suspect once pricing settles on the new/upcoming 4gb 960s, they will become a more competitive product in this bracket.

Click to expand…

Does 4GB Improve 1080P Performance on a GTX 960?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m69iYstfXTw

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by revengeyo

Does 4GB Improve 1080P Performance on a GTX 960?
https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=m69iYstfXTw

Click to expand…

Thanks, I have already seen it

I am waiting for some proper written reviews. I am not a fan of video reviews, they tend not to be as informative as I would like. Sure a video can be an asset to a review but in addition to not in place of imo.

See less

See more

1

Reply

Save

Like

The only real thing that you’ll get from 4GB VRAM on a 960 is ability to turn up textures etc. It won’t bring more FPS, it’s just raising the ceiling for what textures you can use and for some VRAM hungry graphical effects.

If you really need >>2GB VRAM, then a 280, 290 or 970 would probably be better. The added cost of a 4GB 960 over a 2GB 960 would make the 960 the worst price/performance out of any of those cards, unless you didn’t really care about the GPU performance but want to run super high res textures etc

Reply

Save

Like

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyro999

The only real thing that you’ll get from 4GB VRAM on a 960 is ability to turn up textures etc. It won’t bring more FPS, it’s just raising the ceiling for what textures you can use and for some VRAM hungry graphical effects.

If you really need >>2GB VRAM, then a 280, 290 or 970 would probably be better. The added cost of a 4GB 960 over a 2GB 960 would make the 960 the worst price/performance out of any of those cards, unless you didn’t really care about the GPU performance but want to run super high res textures etc

Click to expand…

Couldn’t agree more, especially at the current price point. I already have a 2gb 960 G1 Gaming so I won’t be going out to buy the 4gb version. Maybe if the 4gb cards drop to where the 2gb cards are now it may be worth it but even then the 960 should sit at about $170 — $180 imo. The r9 290 is a no brainer at about $10 — $15 more than the 4gb 960.

Reply

Save

Like

give me bios DP/DD Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 2GB Original pls

See less

See more

1

Reply

Save

Like

1 — 20 of 20 Posts

This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.