GIGABYTE GTX 960 G1 Gaming Physical Review and Overclocking
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
16608
Views
19
Replies
11
Participants
Last post by
wantworld,
Jump to Latest
Sin0822
Discussion starter
·
The NVIDIA GTX 960 was released today and GIGABYTE is offering up a nice lineup of GTX 960 iterations; today I get hands on with the GTX 960 G1 Gaming edition. This is GIGABYTE?s to overclock edition and the GPU core is binned according to GIGABYTE?s ?GPU Gauntlet Sorting?. They are also strengthening the VRM by doubling the amount of phases, equipping the card with a WINDFORCE 3X cooler, introducing a new Fan Stop mode, and showing off a new ?Flex Display? technology.
http://imageshack.com/i/exTGMpeCj
The new GTX 960 features 2GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus. This makes sense as memory density has increased memory buses have become smaller because the number of memory chips has decreased due to increase density (going from 256MB chips on GTX 700 series to 512MB chips on the GTX 900 series). NVIDIA has also improved their memory compression with their 3rd generation delta color compression. Memory bandwidth is 112 GBps which is determined by bus width and memory speed, NVIDIA says that with their improved memory compression the effective bandwidth is as high as 149 GBps. Maxwell?s improved memory architecture with enhanced compression algorithms and caching effectiveness, should improve memory bandwidth by 25%, that is how 112 GBps becomes 149 GBps. There are a ton of reviews out there already, and this isn’t a full fledged GTX 960 review (mainly b/c i don’t have to compare against), so I will focus more on the hardware and features of this card and overclocking performance.
Specs:
http://imageshack.com/i/pcoBnCtcp
The Core base clock is 114 MHz higher (1241 MHz) than the standard of 1127 MHz and the boost is 126 MHz higher (1304 MHz) than the stock of 1178 MHz. The card also features six display outputs.
http://imageshack.com/i/exINUlQPj
The box is simple.
http://imageshack.com/i/pbNHGAygj
There are two 6-pin PCI-E power adapter cables, the card has two 6-pin power sockets.
http://imageshack.com/i/pbxwVDVbj
I am a fan of back plates, and I applaud its addition here as GIGABYTE usually doesn?t use backplates.
http://imageshack.com/i/eyjKHu5ej
This is the WINDFORCE 3X cooler, which is very impressive. The fans unique blades to improve airflow, 4x6mm copper heatpipes move heat away from the core, and the cooler has a 300W thermal load capacity. Since this cooler is very hefty for this card, there is a semi-passive mode in which the fans will automatically stop.
If you ramp up by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature stays below 62C the fans will not start.
If you ramp by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature goes over 62c, the fans will stop when the GPU goes back below 43C.
http://imageshack.com/i/ipS219pwj
These are the GPU outputs.
http://imageshack.com/i/p9R8kPUAj
The core and the heatpipes make direct contact and you can see that the contact is tight and the imprint of the heatpipes on the thermal paste on the card is evident. The VRM also has its own cooling which seems to be more than adequate.
http://imageshack.com/i/ex7tUbgFj
This is the GPU PCB top.
http://imageshack.com/i/eyJTECu6j
GPU PCB bottom.
http://imageshack.com/i/f0saIi86j
This is the Maxwell core and its surrounding memory chips. The memory is Samsung 512MB modules and is 7010MHz stock. GIGABYTE doesn?t overclock the memory by default. You will notice an empty pad, perhaps there is another version to come later on and the GTX 960 shares the same PCB.
http://imageshack.com/i/p8dUbJ4tj
The VRM is made up of 6 phases opposed to the standard 3. This should offer much better overclocks than the stock 3-phase VRM. Each phase is made up of a Rensas RJK03B7 high-side MOSFET and two RJK0393 which are the low-side MOSFETs. These are PowerPAKs that are common on motherboards, and they should do fine here. The VRM is capable of 160W output according to GIGABYTE.
http://imageshack.com/i/p8XIUYgcj
Here GIGABYTE is using the specified ON Semiconductor NCP81174 which is a 4 phase PWM, however to get 6 phases, only 3 phases are used and doubled by three NCP81162 which output to 6 drivers which seems to be from Richtek. This VRM is basically twice the power phases as the reference card, and it should fair very well, especially with the hefty WINDFORCE cooler cooling it down directly.
http://imageshack.com/i/exIlEpiaj
The memory is powered by a single phase VRM powered by a NCP5239, which is a single phase PWM with integrated drivers. The MOSFETs are in the same configuration as the GPU Core VRM.
http://imageshack.com/i/idmebKxMj
The GIGABYTE GTX 960 G1 Gaming features dual BIOS ROMs in-case you damage one overclocking.
http://imageshack.com/i/ideGrFfJj
These two Pericom PI3WVR124 are high speed HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.2 switches.
http://imageshack.com/i/p7iRFhw5j
The Texas Instruments INA3221 is a 3 channel high current bus and voltage monitor, which is no doubt in charge of monitoring power distribution to the GPU.
Overclocking:
I decided to give GIGABYTE’s OC Guru a try, and the program has most settings you might want for overclocking
http://imageshack.com/i/idAhswJbp
To increase power limits you need to tell the program to focus on temperature and take the max temperature to 95c to get power limits to increase over 100%. If you want to increase the core voltage you need to use the offset and boot it to +0.100v. I was able to get much higher clocks, with boosts in the 1600 for the core, but scores were lower.
http://imageshack.com/i/p8pG7nXep
I liked 1300MHz on the Core, with 1363Mhz boost, and 1763Mhz for the memory. It’s just a slight memory bump to ensure stability and longevity. Even with the increase in power, temperature, and voltage the fans still kept silent and temperatures never went over 71C which is great.
Setup:
I used this setup:
Intel 5960X
GIGABYTE X99-Gaming 5
GIGABYTE GTX 960 G1 Gaming and AMD R9 270X
G.Skill 3200MHz memory (at stock)
Enermax 1000W Platimax
Crucial C300
Noctua NH-D15
Fans off due to low GPU activity:
http://imageshack.com/i/idR2QVJpp
Fans on:
http://imageshack.com/i/pdRF0E7Bp
The fan feature to turn off all fans is a nice touch, although the card is silent at all times and having the fans running wouldn’t create much noise.
Quick Benchmarks with overclocking at [email protected]:
3DMark11:
UNIGINE Heaven 4.0
http://imageshack.com/i/ipmCStdMp
Resident Evil Benchmark
Conclusion:
The card is a well cooled and powered GTX 960. The heatsink does its job, and the entire time I was using it and even while overclocked, the fans were basically silent. A few times I touched the heatsink to see if it was being cooled, and it was never more than a bit warm to the touch. The card is very nice, core clocks are very high and they can overclock high, the memory doesn’t OC that high though.
http://imageshack.com/i/exTGMpeCj
I was very impressed with the card and cooler specifically. I had never had a GPU run so silent yet perform. Every time I put a GPU in and I go to play BFBC2 I can hear it, but not with this card. The core is definitely binned and the VRM does a great job of keeping up with the demand. However this is a mid to upper level card, and as such it isn’t going to eat a lot of power or generate a lot of heat, but at the same time it is meant for gaming at 1080P. If you want to go to higher resolutions you should probably look at a GTX 970 or GTX 980. The GTX 960 G1 Gaming is great for those who want a mid-range graphics card. While the price is $229, it isn’t very far away from other GTX 960 contenders. NVIDIA cards are more expensive in general, and since this is still part of the GTX 900 series family, its recency adds to its premium. However for that price GIGABYTE is giving you one heck of a card, with a great cooler.
If you guys would like I can run more benchmarks, but for now I only have a R9 270X and the GTX 960, I should have some GTX 980s soon to add and expand the number of benchmarks.
See less
See more
25
Reply
Save
Like
1 — 20 of 20 Posts
That’s one heck of a cooler for a 960! lol. I like the lights on each side of the «Windforce» led too.
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sin0822
……
If you ramp up by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature stays below 62C the fans will not start.
If you ramp by applying a GPU load and the GPU Core temperature goes over 62c, the fans will stop when the GPU goes back below 43C.…….
Click to expand…
Slight typo but overall very good review!
Beastly cooler for an otherwise underwhelming card.
love the LED’s that go on when the fans are on idle!
Reply
Save
Like
fixed! thanks guys!
Reply
Save
Like
Nicely done. Can you post the BIOS here? I’d like to take a look at it.
Reply
Save
Like
Sure here you go:
N960G1GAMING-2GD.zip 136k .zip file
. Also I updated the 270X scores, only 3d11 and RE were affected b/c I had used an outdated driver, new driver brought huge improvements to the 270x score
-
N960G1GAMING-2GD.zip
136.5 KB
Views: 57
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sin0822
Sure here you go:
N960G1GAMING-2GD. zip 136k .zip file
. Also I updated the 270X scores, only 3d11 and RE were affected b/c I had used an outdated driver, new driver brought huge improvements to the 270x scoreClick to expand…
Thanks. I noticed that the default voltage is far lower than it is on a GTX 980/970. I did mod it to 1.281V if you want to try it see if you can overclock it further with better stability:
N960G1GAMING-2GD-Mod.zip 176k .zip file
-
N960G1GAMING-2GD-Mod.zip
176.2 KB
Views: 92
Reply
Save
Like
Nice review, what I was hoping for though was you’d show there was something special in the G1 Gaming that we could «tune» because I have the 970s
Anyhow, question.
Over here the price range of the 960 is ~$290 for the Galax up to $360 for the G1 Gaming. Compare that to the AMD range, you get 280s for $270 and 280Xs from $330 up to $350. Shouldn’t you include both of these cards in the benchmark section also (unless of course you only have the 270X).
NOTE: I have no idea how AMD cards compare to each other.
See less
See more
1
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclops
Thanks. I noticed that the default voltage is far lower than it is on a GTX 980/970. I did mod it to 1.281V if you want to try it see if you can overclock it further with better stability:
N960G1GAMING-2GD-Mod.zip 176k .zip file
Click to expand…
Thanks! I will give it a shot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by error-id10t
Nice review, what I was hoping for though was you’d show there was something special in the G1 Gaming that we could «tune» because I have the 970s
Anyhow, question.
Over here the price range of the 960 is ~$290 for the Galax up to $360 for the G1 Gaming. Compare that to the AMD range, you get 280s for $270 and 280Xs from $330 up to $350. Shouldn’t you include both of these cards in the benchmark section also (unless of course you only have the 270X).
NOTE: I have no idea how AMD cards compare to each other.
Click to expand…
I actually only have these two cards ATM that i can bench
But I would have liked to toss in the 280X and the 285.. I think the price of the G1 gaming is mainly due to the cooler and the upgraded VRM, the card runs basically silent even when OCed and running at full load which is really nice.
See less
See more
1
Reply
Save
Like
Great review
I love mine, it looks amazing, runs silent and kicks some serious ass @ ~$200 for 1080p gaming. I keep seeing the interweb trolls harping on about 2gb, 128bit, whine whine blah blah but at the end of the day, this thing is literally 200% the performance of the old HD 5850 I replaced with it. Considering the 5850 was still playing everything I threw at it @1080p, albeit at lowered settings, the 960 is a significant upgrade, did not break my bank balance and runs on less power than my 5850 that was, in its day, super efficient. I think a lot of people fail to realize that once you reach a bracket where the GPU is consistently churning out 60+ fps at the target resolution there is absolutely 0 point in spending $100+ more for another 10 — 20 fps unless you plan to upgrade your monitor and game at a higher resolution in the near future or, you are on a long upgrade cycle and want to be sure your purchase will be good for the next 2 — 5 years. The 960 is more than adequate for my needs and delivers everything I expected it would. Not to mention it beats out even the mighty 770 when I overclock it.
Most of the trolls out there have never tested and do not own one of these and thus have no business spewing technical specs and siting an R9 280 is better because a spec sheet says so. The tech in these new maxwells is a huge step up considering its on the same fab as the 700 series cards yet delivers huge performance and efficiency gains. Spec sheets don’t cover optimizations or real world performance. by troll logic my 5850 would be a better card than the 960 if it had another gb of ram on it lol.
See less
See more
1
Reply
Save
Like
I saw this review on a dutch website
Overclock results.
The scores are about the same on my r9 290x lol and it uses twice as less energy
How did that happen.
They report seeing boostclock 1600mhz+
http://nl.hardware.info/reviews/5906/10/geforce-gtx-960-vergelijkingstest-deel-2-asus-evga-gigabyte-inno3d-msi-en-zotac-getest-overklokken
See less
See more
2
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by revengeyo
I saw this review on a dutch website
Overclock results.
The scores are about the same on my r9 290x lol and it uses twice as less energy
How did that happen.
They report seeing boostclock 1600mhz+http://nl.hardware.info/reviews/5906/10/geforce-gtx-960-vergelijkingstest-deel-2-asus-evga-gigabyte-inno3d-msi-en-zotac-getest-overklokken
Click to expand…
compare the graphics scores . . .
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8776470
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
I think a lot of people fail to realize that once you reach a bracket where the GPU is consistently churning out 60+ fps at the target resolution there is absolutely 0 point in spending $100+ more for another 10 — 20 fps
Click to expand…
The 960 and 970 are the same performance/£ here — the price difference is pretty much exactly the same as the performance difference, around 1.65x — so it’s just a matter of how much VRAM you need, and how much performance you want. For 1080p60 it’s easier to shoot lower. A single 960 will hold 1080p60 more easily than a single 980 will hold 1080p144
Reply
Save
Like
I am running at 1080p and have 2 EVGA GTX960’s in SLI and love em. I know it’s probably overkill but I bought the 2 of them for aesthetics so I can have matching cards in my rig.
See less
See more
1
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro999
The 960 and 970 are the same performance/£ here — the price difference is pretty much exactly the same as the performance difference, around 1. 65x — so it’s just a matter of how much VRAM you need, and how much performance you want. For 1080p60 it’s easier to shoot lower. A single 960 will hold 1080p60 more easily than a single 980 will hold 1080p144
Click to expand…
Totally agree, I am looking forward to seeing the difference 4gb makes to 960s.
Current gen consoles are sporting upper Radeon R7 spec GPUs which I guess you can consider to be roughly on par with R9 270x/R9 280 with the low level API console developers have access to. That means that most games will run great on systems with cards in this price/performance bracket until the next generation of consoles is released with the major drawback being VRAM seeing as both the XBone and PS4 have access to far more than mid tier GPUs. Games are already starting to step up graphically to the newer console specs, sadly that does not seem to be making them any less boring to play with all the focus still going into EPeen stroking all the multiplayer junkes and teens out there that only really care about maximum graphical awesomeness + blisteringly fast FPS. Games are so stale these days I only usually ever have 1 or 2 installed these days, so much so I am wondering if I shouldn’t have just gotten an R7 260 and an i5 4690k instead of my 960/g3258. Maybe I am just getting to old for games
Still, the 960/R9 280 — 280x to me seem to be the sweet spot for 1080p and lower and I suspect once pricing settles on the new/upcoming 4gb 960s, they will become a more competitive product in this bracket.
See less
See more
1
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaltar
Totally agree, I am looking forward to seeing the difference 4gb makes to 960s.
Current gen consoles are sporting upper Radeon R7 spec GPUs which I guess you can consider to be roughly on par with R9 270x/R9 280 with the low level API console developers have access to. That means that most games will run great on systems with cards in this price/performance bracket until the next generation of consoles is released with the major drawback being VRAM seeing as both the XBone and PS4 have access to far more than mid tier GPUs. Games are already starting to step up graphically to the newer console specs, sadly that does not seem to be making them any less boring to play with all the focus still going into EPeen stroking all the multiplayer junkes and teens out there that only really care about maximum graphical awesomeness + blisteringly fast FPS. Games are so stale these days I only usually ever have 1 or 2 installed these days, so much so I am wondering if I shouldn’t have just gotten an R7 260 and an i5 4690k instead of my 960/g3258. Maybe I am just getting to old for games
Still, the 960/R9 280 — 280x to me seem to be the sweet spot for 1080p and lower and I suspect once pricing settles on the new/upcoming 4gb 960s, they will become a more competitive product in this bracket.
Click to expand…
Does 4GB Improve 1080P Performance on a GTX 960?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m69iYstfXTw
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by revengeyo
Does 4GB Improve 1080P Performance on a GTX 960?
https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=m69iYstfXTwClick to expand…
Thanks, I have already seen it
I am waiting for some proper written reviews. I am not a fan of video reviews, they tend not to be as informative as I would like. Sure a video can be an asset to a review but in addition to not in place of imo.
See less
See more
1
Reply
Save
Like
The only real thing that you’ll get from 4GB VRAM on a 960 is ability to turn up textures etc. It won’t bring more FPS, it’s just raising the ceiling for what textures you can use and for some VRAM hungry graphical effects.
If you really need >>2GB VRAM, then a 280, 290 or 970 would probably be better. The added cost of a 4GB 960 over a 2GB 960 would make the 960 the worst price/performance out of any of those cards, unless you didn’t really care about the GPU performance but want to run super high res textures etc
Reply
Save
Like
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro999
The only real thing that you’ll get from 4GB VRAM on a 960 is ability to turn up textures etc. It won’t bring more FPS, it’s just raising the ceiling for what textures you can use and for some VRAM hungry graphical effects.
If you really need >>2GB VRAM, then a 280, 290 or 970 would probably be better. The added cost of a 4GB 960 over a 2GB 960 would make the 960 the worst price/performance out of any of those cards, unless you didn’t really care about the GPU performance but want to run super high res textures etc
Click to expand…
Couldn’t agree more, especially at the current price point. I already have a 2gb 960 G1 Gaming so I won’t be going out to buy the 4gb version. Maybe if the 4gb cards drop to where the 2gb cards are now it may be worth it but even then the 960 should sit at about $170 — $180 imo. The r9 290 is a no brainer at about $10 — $15 more than the 4gb 960.
Reply
Save
Like
give me bios DP/DD Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 2GB Original pls
See less
See more
1
Reply
Save
Like
1 — 20 of 20 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top
GIGABYTE GTX 960 G1 Gaming Review
👤by Richard Weatherstone
Comments
📅22-01-15
Introduction
Product on Review: GV-N960G1 GAMING-2GD
Manufacturer & Sponsor: GIGABYTE
Street Price: 194.99 GBP
Our first NVIDIA GTX 960 Review comes in the form of the new GIGABYTE G1 GAMING series. This new group features a redesigned Windforce cooler FLEX display technology while also being overclocked from the factory. We’ve examined the Windforce cooler in great depth on numerous occasions and will continue to do with this variant which has some very neat touches. However, the big attraction with this card is the new GTX 960 core from NVIDIA — code named ‘Maxwell’. Itself, a variant of the full fat Maxwell core found on the GTX 980 and GTX 970 graphics cards from the same family, this version is a trimmed down core which still features many of those found on the GTX 960’s stablemates. Power saving is the main attraction here.
The GTX 980s and GTX 970s while being fine examples of graphics cards in their own right failed to thoroughly impress us in that the main attraction being power saving. Sure there were performance improvements over their forbears but power saving is not a key feature most end users will look for when opting for a flagship product. Out right performance is key there. Not so with a mid range card where value for money encompasses all attributes not just the purchase cost but also running costs and here is where the Maxwell core scores big.
Over the next 20 or so pages we will examine the GIGABYTE G1 Gaming in great detail as you expect here at Vortez and will be comparing this graphics card against the previous GTX 760, another GTX 960 and of course the GTX 960’s main competition, the AMD R9-280 and R9-285.
About GIGABYTE:
GIGABYTE was founded in 1986, establishing our uncontested position in continuous technological innovation. By focusing on key technologies and achieving strict quality standards, GIGABYTE has been regarded as an innovative and trusted motherboard leader in the globe. To keep pace in a rapidly changing world, we have offered a comprehensive product line covering Motherboards, Graphics Cards, PC Components, PC Peripherals, Laptops, Slate Devices, Desktop PCs, Network Communications, Servers and Mobile Phones. We are dedicated to building up a full-range digital life, responding promptly and sonorously to consumer needs and desires.
21 pages
1
2
3
4
>
»
Page 1: IntroductionPage 2: SpecificationPage 3: GTX 960 FeaturesPage 4: DSR & MFAAPage 5: Packaging & AccessoriesPage 6: First LookPage 7: Closer LookPage 8: Test Setup & MethodologyPage 9: Temperature, Acoustics and Power ConsumptionPage 10: OverclockingPage 11: Futuremark 3DMark Fire Strike (Synthetic)Page 12: Unigine: Heaven 4 (Synthetic)Page 13: Unigine: Valley (Synthetic)Page 14: Battlefield 4 (FPS)Page 15: Watchdogs (Action/Adventure)Page 16: Thief (Stealth)Page 17: Company of Heroes 2 (RTS)Page 18: Metro: Last Light (FPS)Page 19: GRID: 2 (Arcade Sim)Page 20: Overall PerformancePage 21: Conclusion
Review and testing of the video card Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming
Contents
- Introduction
- Review Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming
- Appearance and dimensions
- PCB
- Cooling system
- Test stand
- Instrumentation and Test Method
- Cooling System Potential Study
- Cooling System Performance Summary
- Overclocking: theory
- Electricity consumption level
- Results Metro: Last Light
- Details
- Conclusion
Introduction
Thinking about the right way to start reviewing another video card, I decided to look at everything from the other side. It is worth assessing the progress by bringing together in one table all the GPUs released in the last couple of years.
One of the vendors is making desperate attempts to modify the successful GCN architecture, but somehow all enthusiasm dissipates after the release of a single core. The second company, on the contrary, is constantly developing in small but very effective steps, moving in the right direction. That is why AMD’s market share is falling while Nvidia’s is growing.
Although, frankly speaking, we haven’t seen much progress for a long time. The only thing the Californian company won was in reducing the power consumption of its graphics solutions. As a result, you no longer need to keep two large families of GPUs, because Maxwell allows you to make microcircuits for the discrete video card and laptop market.
Let’s move on to the next creation of Nvidia — GM206-300, presented this time by the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming (GV-N960G1 Gaming-2GD).
Review Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming
Appearance and dimensions
Model |
A, mm |
b, mm |
c, mm |
D, mm |
A1, mm |
b1, mm |
C1, mm |
MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 2G |
252 |
98 |
33 |
95 |
267 |
125 |
37 |
Palit GeForce GTX 960 Super JetStream |
172 |
98 |
45 |
88 |
245 |
112 |
49 |
Gigabyte GV-N960G1 Gaming-2GD |
240 |
98 |
35 |
77 |
296 |
99 |
42 |
А – printed circuit board length, excluding cooling system and video output port bracket.
B PCB width, excluding PCI-E pins and cooling system.
C — height from the horizontal plane of the printed circuit board to the level of the upper surface of the cooling system.
D – diameter of the fan/s along the outer radius.
A1 – length of the printed circuit board, including the cooling system (if it extends beyond the printed circuit board) to the bracket for the video output ports.
В1 — width of the printed circuit board, excluding PCI-E pins, but including the measurement of the cooling system (if it extends beyond the printed circuit board).
C1 — height, taking into account the back plate (if any) or radiator mounting screws to the level of the upper surface of the cooling system. If it is lower than the height of the back plate of the video output ports, then the height is measured to the top point of the bar.
Video cards from Gigabyte, unlike other similar models, are equipped with one not superfluous DVI port. The total number of video outputs has been increased to six. You can use five at the same time, but with one feature.
Yes, you can connect multiple displays to a regular GeForce GTX 960 using three DisplayPorts and one DVI. Basically, a multi-monitor configuration makes sense when a group of multiple high-resolution displays (more than 2560 x 1440) is created. In this case, the HDMI port disappears, and the Gigabyte GTX 960 has exactly the same number of useful video outputs as on versions with a reference set of ports.
It might be possible to work around this by using two full DVI ports, but you lose a DisplayPort pair with this option. So in the case of the hero of the review, an extended set of ports is a certain compromise.
PCB
No new and original ideas, since the GM206 is quite an economical GPU. Unless, to ensure the high frequency of its operation, the engineers resorted to installing as many as six power phases.
In reality, the power system consists of three phases, which are wired in parallel through doublers. They are located on the back side.
Magic coils are designed to finally overcome the disease of extraneous squeak at partial load on the GPU. Judging by further tests, Gigabyte developers managed to find a solution to this issue. G1 Gaming is the first graphics card that does not emit a squeak under load.
The memory power is traditionally placed at the end of the PCB. Otherwise, there are no LED power indicators, ways to bypass protection, and so on.
The sadder, because two 6pin connectors are used for work. This provides enough total power to overclock to any level. It remains to check what the engineers have done with the BIOS, and how they met all Nvidia’s requirements for restrictions.
PWM controller for all GeForce GTX 960 one is NCP81174. It also works with a couple of other Maxwell based GPUs: GeForce GTX 970 and GTX 980.
Four memory chips manufactured by Samsung soldered on the front and back. They are designed for frequencies up to 1750 MHz (effective frequency 7000 MHz), the bus width is 128 bits.
Maxwell graphics core released at the end of 2014. The nominal frequencies of the video card are 1241 MHz for the GPU (GPU Boost up to 1304 MHz) and 1750 MHz for the memory. In reality, the declared frequency numbers almost never match.
A little bit about ASIC Quality
By popular demand, here is an allegedly «quality» assessment of the GPU by the GPU-Z program.
Later on, you will realize that ASIC Quality evaluates a parameter that is far from being responsible for the dependence of the overclocking ratio and the supplied voltage on the GPU. The real quality is measured after the final assembly of the video core, when the crystal is placed on a textolite substrate and current is passed through the contacts. The general principle of evaluation is the same, but each developer uses his own unique ways and does not want to share them with competitors. After all, the faster you check the mass of processors, the lower the production costs.
The question is, how many GPUs are discarded in the final testing process? Not much, because the bulk of the marriage has already been sifted out during the production of the crystal itself and it remains only to set the marking of the rated voltage for it. The table for the GeForce GTX 960 is unified, it can be viewed in the BIOS of the video card. Theoretically, the worse the processor, the higher the rated current should be, but this is not always the case. There are many separately powered units inside the graphics core: some are quite simple and operate in a wide voltage range, while others, on the contrary, are complex and function only under certain conditions.
For example, TMU and FP64 Cuda cores are large, they take up a fair amount of area. Accordingly, they need to be “correctly” fed? No, another mistake, one of the most power-demanding blocks is the task manager! If the entire GPU works stably at 1.0 V, but the controller fails at 1.1 V, then the nominal voltage according to the table is increased by one step. Let’s say at 1.125 V the video core becomes problem-free, and GPU-Z compares VID 1.125 with a common base and gives ASIC Quality only 60%. In reality, such a GPU can be overclocked even better than the one whose ASIC is higher. After all, the TMU block will be the faulty section.
Therefore, ASIC performance should be taken with skepticism. In fact, there are many other nuances in assessing the quality of a GPU. But, alas, the signed NDA does not allow sharing them with the audience.
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming
Top specifications and features
- Passmark score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Vantage Performance test score
Passmark
test score Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming:
5867
Best score:
30117
Performance
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming:
2007
Best score:
Memory
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming:
563
Best score:
General Information
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming:
1577
Best score:
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming features:
100
Best score:
Description
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming graphics card based on Maxwell architecture has 2940 million transistors, tech. process 28 nm. The frequency of the graphics core is 1241 MHz. In terms of memory, 4 GB is installed here. DDR5, clocked at 1753 MHz and with a maximum throughput of 112.2 Gb/s. Texture size is 79.4 GTexels/s. FLOPS is 2.47.
In tests, the video card Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming showed itself as follows — according to the Passmark benchmark, the model scored 5867 points. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points. According to the 3DMark benchmark, the video card scored 7696 points out of 49575 possible.
Directx Version — 12.
In terms of compatibility, the video card is connected via the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Regarding cooling, the heat dissipation requirements here are 120 watts.
In our tests, the video card scores 1763511 points.
Why Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming is better than others
No merits
- Passmark score 5867 . This parameter is lower than 49% of products
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score 6512 . This parameter is lower than 41% of products
- Test score 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics 7696 . This parameter is lower than 42% of products
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test score 302206 . This parameter is lower than that of 36% of goods
- 3DMark Vantage Performance score 29895 . This parameter is lower than 35% of products
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score 48529 . This parameter is lower than 40% of products
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score 10469 . This parameter is lower than 39% of products
- Unigine Heaven 4.0 test score 842 . This parameter is lower than that of 13% of goods
Review Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming
Performance
Memory
general information
Functions
Ports
Tests in benchmarks
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming Review: Highlights
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1241MHz
max 2457
Average: 1124. 9 MHz
2457MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1753MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
16000MHz
FLOPS
A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
2.47TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
1142.32TFLOPS
RAM
Graphics card RAM (also known as video memory or VRAM) is a special type of memory used by a graphics card to store graphics data. It serves as a temporary buffer for textures, shaders, geometry, and other graphics resources that are needed to display images on the screen. More RAM allows the graphics card to work with more data and handle more complex graphic scenes with high resolution and detail.
Show all
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
128GB
Number of PCIe lanes
The number of PCIe lanes in graphics cards determines the speed and bandwidth of data transfer between the graphics card and other computer components through the PCIe interface. The more PCIe lanes a video card has, the more bandwidth and ability to communicate with other computer components.
Show all
16
Mean value:
L1 cache size
L1 cache size in video cards is usually small and is measured in kilobytes (KB) or megabytes (MB). It is designed to temporarily store the most active and frequently used data and instructions, allowing the graphics card to access them faster and reduce delays in graphics operations.
Show all
48
Mean value:
Pixel rendering speed
The higher the pixel rendering speed, the smoother and more realistic the display of graphics and the movement of objects on the screen will be.
Show all
39.7 GTexel/s
max 563
Average: 94.3Gtexel/s
563 GTexel/s
TMUs
Responsible for texturing objects in 3D graphics. TMU provides textures to the surfaces of objects, which gives them a realistic look and detail. The number of TMUs in a video card determines its ability to process textures. The more TMUs, the more textures can be processed at the same time, which contributes to better texturing of objects and increases the realism of graphics.
Show all
64
max 880
Average: 140.1
880
ROPs
Responsible for the final processing of pixels and their display on the screen. ROPs perform various operations on pixels, such as blending colors, applying transparency, and writing to the framebuffer. The number of ROPs in a video card affects its ability to process and display graphics. The more ROPs, the more pixels and image fragments can be processed and displayed on the screen at the same time. A higher number of ROPs generally results in faster and more efficient graphics rendering and better performance in games and graphics applications.
Show all
32
max 256
Average: 56.8
256
Number of shading blocks
The number of shader blocks in video cards refers to the number of parallel processors that perform computational operations in the GPU. The more shader units in the video card, the more computing resources are available for processing graphics tasks.
Show all
1024
max 17408
Mean value:
17408
L2 cache size
Used to temporarily store data and instructions used by the graphics card when performing graphics calculations. A larger L2 cache allows the graphics card to store more data and instructions, which helps speed up the processing of graphics operations.
Show all
1024
Mean value:
Turbo GPU
If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1304MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
2903MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
79.4 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145. 4 GTexels/s
756.8 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Maxwell
GPU name
GM206
Memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
112.2GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
2656GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
7012MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
19500MHz
RAM
Video card random access memory (also known as video memory or VRAM) is a special type of memory used by a video card to store graphics data. It serves as a temporary buffer for textures, shaders, geometry, and other graphics resources that are needed to display images on the screen. More RAM allows the graphics card to work with more data and handle more complex graphic scenes with high resolution and detail.
Show all
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
128GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
5
Mean: 4.9
6
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
128bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
8192bit
Die size
The physical dimensions of the chip that houses the transistors, microcircuits, and other components necessary for the operation of the video card. The larger the die size, the more space the GPU takes up on the video card. Larger die sizes can provide more computing resources, such as CUDA cores or tensor cores, which can lead to increased performance and graphics processing capabilities.
Show all
228
max 826
Average: 356.7
826
Generation
A new generation of graphics card usually includes improved architecture, higher performance, more efficient use of power, improved graphics capabilities and new features.
GeForce 900
Manufacturer
TSMC
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
120W
Average value: 160 W
2W
Manufacturing process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
28 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
4 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
2940 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
80000 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided for the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Average: 3
4
Width
298mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
421.7 mm
Height
115mm
max 620
Average: 89.6mm
620 mm
Destination
Desktop
OpenGL version
OpenGL provides access to the graphics card’s hardware capabilities for displaying 2D and 3D graphics objects. New versions of OpenGL may include support for new graphical effects, performance optimizations, bug fixes, and other improvements.
Show all
4.5
Mean value:
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
12.2
Shader model version
The higher the shader model version in the video card, the more functions and options are available for programming graphic effects.
Show all
6.4
max 6.7
Average: 5.9
6.7
Vulkan Version
A higher Vulkan version usually means a larger set of features, optimizations, and improvements that software developers can use to create faster and more realistic graphical applications and games.
Show all
1.3
max 1.3
Mean value:
1.3
CUDA version
Enables the use of graphics card compute cores for parallel computing, which can be useful in areas such as scientific research, deep learning, image processing, and other computationally intensive tasks.
Show all
5.2
max 9.0
Mean value:
9.0
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini-HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show all
Yes
DisplayPort
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2. 2
4
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
2
Mean: 1.4
3
Number of HDMI connectors
Show all
1
Average: 1.1
3
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
HDMI
A digital interface that is used to transmit high definition audio and video signals.
Full text
Yes
Passmark test score
The Passmark Video Card Test is a program for measuring and comparing graphics system performance. It conducts various tests and calculations to evaluate the speed and performance of a graphics card in various areas.
Show all
5867
max 30117
Average: 7628.6
30117
3DMark Cloud Gate benchmark score GPU
48529
max 196940
Average: 80042.3
196940
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6512
max 39424
Average: 12463
39424
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics 9 test score0302
It measures and compares the ability of a graphics card to handle high resolution 3D graphics with various graphic effects. The Fire Strike Graphics test includes complex scenes, lighting, shadows, particles, reflections, and other graphical effects to evaluate the graphics card’s performance in gaming and other demanding graphics scenarios.
Show all
7696
max 51062
Average: 11859.1
51062
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
10469
max 59675
Average: 18799.9
59675
3DMark Vantage Performance score
29895
max 97329
Average: 37830.6
97329
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
302206
max 539757
Average: 372425.7
539757
Unigine Heaven 4.0 test score
During the Unigine Heaven test, the graphics card goes through a series of graphical tasks and effects that can be intensive to process, and displays the result as a numerical value (points) and a visual representation of the scene.
Show all
842
max 4726
Average: 1291.1
4726
Octane Render test score OctaneBench
A special test that is used to evaluate the performance of video cards in rendering using the Octane Render engine.
Show all
47
max 128
Average: 47.1
128
FAQ
How much RAM does Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming have
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming has 4 GB.
What version of RAM does Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming support GDDR5.
What is the architecture of the video card Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming
Maxwell.
How many watts does the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming consume
120 watts.
How the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 Gaming performs in benchmarks
In the Passmark benchmark, the video card scored 5867 points.
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 9 FLOPS60 G1 Gaming
2.