Gtx 965m vs 1050 ti: Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti vs 965M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 965M Graphics cards Comparison

When choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 965M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let’s find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 965M.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile

Check Price

GeForce GTX 965M

Check Price

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 965M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 965M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile or GeForce GTX 965M here:

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile Laptops

GeForce GTX 965M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile	GeForce GTX 965M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile is connected by PCIe 3. 0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 965M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
• Both cards are used in Laptops.
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M — with Maxwell.
• Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile is 549 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M — by 28 nm process technology.
• Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 2493 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	35−40	20−22
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	6−7
4K / 2160p	10−11	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
high / 1080p	55−60	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	35−40	10−12
4K / 2160p	18−20	7−8
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	230−240
medium / 768p	220−230	200−210
ultra / 1080p	180−190	110−120
QHD / 1440p	110−120	85−90
4K / 2160p	70−75	45−50
high / 768p	210−220	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	7−8
low / 720p	80−85	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	30−35	12−14
4K / 2160p	24−27	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	65−70	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
low / 768p	140−150	100−110
medium / 768p	120−130	90−95
high / 1080p	70−75	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
QHD / 1440p	21−24	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−11
QHD / 1440p	10−11	1−2
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	35−40	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
low / 768p	130−140	70−75
medium / 768p	85−90	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile	GeForce GTX 965M
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP107	N16E-GS, N16E-GR
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2017	5 January 2015
Pipelines	768	1024
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	944 MHz
Boost Clock	1620 MHz	950 / 1151 MHz
Transistor count	3,300 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	77. 76	73.60
Floating-point performance		2,355 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	—	—
G-SYNC support	+	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1
CUDA	+	+
CUDA cores	768	1024
Bus support		PCI Express 3. 0
SLI options		+
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		226 Mh/s
Laptop size	large	large
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder		+
Optimus		+
GameStream		+
GeForce ShadowPlay		+
GPU Boost		2.0
GameWorks		+
BatteryBoost		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile vs Quadro K5200
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile vs FirePro W9000
• GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro K5200
• GeForce GTX 965M vs FirePro W9000
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile vs Radeon HD 8970M
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti mobile vs Radeon HD 6930
• GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M
• GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 6930

Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti what is better?

General information
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
no data	59.7 %
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Code name
GM204	GP107
Type
Start price
no data	139 USD
Number of shader processors
1024 256 (33.3%) better	768
Core Frequency
944 MGz	1291 MGz 347 MGz (36.8%) better
Frequency in Boost mode
950 MGz	1392 MGz 442 MGz (46. 5%) better
Number of transistors
5,200	3,300
Technological process
28 nm	14 nm -14 nm (-50%) better
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load, the larger the value — the more the requirements for cooling and energy consumption increase.
50 Wt -25 Wt (-33.3%) better	75 Wt
Length
no data	145
Additional power connectors
G-SYNC Support NVIDIA G-SYNC technology provides a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and elimination of visual artifacts.
Multi Monitor
no data	+
SLI support
+	no data
3D Vision
no data	+
GPU Boost
+	no data
GeForce Experience
+	no data
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies.
no data	+
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level GPU access to optimize graphics instructions (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
no data	+
CUDA The presence of the CUDA architecture allows you to use applications that are optimized for parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.
Multi-Projection NVIDIA Multi-Projection technology improves graphics performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are rendered simultaneously.
no data	+
maximum temperature
no data	97 °C
Ansel
Decred / DCR (Decred)
no data	1. 01 Gh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
no data	1 Sol/s
Bus
PCI Express 3.0	no data
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores increase performance in graphics computing, especially affecting anti-aliasing and lighting in games, and the speed of training neural networks.
1024 256 (33.3%) better	768
GameStream
+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay
GameWorks
HDMI
OpenCL
1. 1	no data
BatteryBoost
+	no data
Support for analog VGA monitors
+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support)
+	no data
H. 264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p Video Decode
+	no data
DSR
+	no data
Video connectors
No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DirectX
12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Floating-point performance
2,355 gflops	2,138 gflops
Optimus
+	no data
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
no data	12. 62 Mh/s

Memory
Memory type
GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount Large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures, use high-resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
4	4
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games.
128 bit	128 bit
Shared memory
—	—
Memory clock speed A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
2500 MGz	7008 MGz 4508 MGz (180.3%) better
Memory Bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM your PC can use.
80	112 32 (40%) better

Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 1024 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,2 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card		Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M				Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Market (main)		Laptop				Laptop
Release date		Q1 2016				Q1 2017
Model number		N16E-GR				N17P-G1-A1
GPU name		GM206				GP107
Architecture		Maxwell 2. 0				Pascal
Generation		GeForce 900M				GeForce 10 Mobile
Lithography		28 nm				14 nm
Transistors		2.940.000.000				3.300.000.000
Bus interface		MXM-B (3.0)				PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock		935 MHz				1,49 GHz
GPU boost clock		1,15 GHz				1,62 GHz
Memory frequency		1.253 MHz				1.752 MHz
Effective memory speed		5 GB/s				7 GB/s
Memory size		2 GB				4 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR5
Memory bus		128 Bit				128 Bit
Memory bandwidth		80,2 GB/s				112,1 GB/s
TDP		—				75 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		8				6
Shading units (cuda cores)		1. 024				768
TMUs		64				48
ROPs		32				32
Cache memory		1 MB				1 MB
Pixel fillrate		36,8 GP/s				51,8 GP/s
Texture fillrate		73,9 GT/s				77,8 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		2,4 TFLOPS				2,5 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		73,6 GFLOPS				77,8 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	2.488
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M	2.355

The difference is 6%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Buy on Amazon

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• 703.1x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 250.3x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 7 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3336

Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 25 October 2016
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate	46.98 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 7 GB/s
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3687
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 651 vs 243
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 6308 vs 2847
• Around 58% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 21864 vs 13872
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4655
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4655

Core clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1354 MHz
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
PassMark — G2D Mark	651 vs 243
PassMark — G3D Mark	6308 vs 2847
Geekbench — OpenCL	21864 vs 13872
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496 vs 4655
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496 vs 4655

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark — G2D Mark	243	651
PassMark — G3D Mark	2847	6308
Geekbench — OpenCL	13872	21864
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3687
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3687
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3336
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3336
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4655	8496
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4655	8496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75. 649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		826.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		23.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		292.876
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score		2341

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Code name	GP107	GP107
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	578	356
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$139
Price now		$159. 99
Value for money (0-100)		46.07
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1. 879 TFLOPS
Pipelines	640	768
Pixel fill rate	23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	46.98 GTexel/s	66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	3300 million	3,300 million
CUDA cores		768
Floating-point performance		2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Interface	PCIe 3. 0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		145 mm
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	56.06 GB/s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)	7 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
DirectX		12. 0 (12_1)
OpenGL		4.6
Vulkan
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready

MSI USA

{{blogList. tagContent}}

{{blogList.blogTitle}}

By {{blogList.blogAuthor}}
|
{{blogList.date}}

In 2017, NVIDIA powered GTX10 series graphics platform on the mobile gaming platform, cause still have more than 50% of the mid-low price range notebook market still use GTX9 series graphics. The GTX 1050 was tend to replace GTX960M, and GTX 1050 Ti to replace GTX 965M, GTX 1060 to replace GTX 970M, GTX 1070 to replace GTX 980M, GTX 1080 to replace GTX 980 of mobile platform GPU transition.

Don’t Buy GTX960M and GTX950M anymore even it’s a bit cheaper!

It’s old architecture in the market; it’s just an overclocked version of GTX860M and GTX850M, since the GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1050 already in the market for months, real gamers and advance users need to know that spend few more money to buy a future ready gaming notebooks with GTX 10 graphics is really a smart and better choice.

GTX 10 of Pascal Architecture with 5 New Generation Technology!

When you take a look on the advantage of Pascal architecture, it comes with 16nm FINFET process for all GPU chips, that makes the GPU comes with lower temperature and smaller die size to optimize the smaller PCBA design easier. With 16nm process, the GTX 10 graphics of Core Clock Level boosted from GTX 9 series of 1000MHz to 50% higher of 1500MHz and even higher, so the real gaming performance is better than old GTX 9 series over 30% at least.

The 3rd advantage on Pascal GTX 10 is new NVLINK architecture inside the Core Architecture, a revolutionary core design that makes the multiple Core Pipes and GPUs got 5x faster acceleration in interconnect bandwidth and multi thread calculation. The built in RAM of HBM2 architecture makes the GPU calculation up to a new level with 3x boost in memory bandwidth performance than old version Maxwell of GTX 9 series. This is really important for gamers and content creators when they play larger scale games or larger scale themes.

Last but not least, NVIDIA enforce the new Pascal architecture GPU with new Artificial Intelligence algorithms, which means not only gaming experience will be faster and better, but also more AI usage will have a big step ahead on performance and arithmetic’s calculation usage.

That helps a lot for new generation of DirectX 12 gaming experience, because if you only compared with 3D Mark 11 P scores, the gap is around 30%~50%, but the 3D Mark 11 Benchmark just based on DirectX 11 architecture, that can’t reflect real gaming experience and VR experience based on DirectX 12 architecture.

DX12 Gaming and VR support is Much Better with GTX 10 GPUs

When you look into old GTX 9 series of Maxwell Architecture, it’s 28nm with higher temperature and much lower Core Clock, you will realized that GTX 9 series did good job but really out of time in 2017. You could see that GTX 1080 already replaced GTX 980 GPU, GTX 1070 replaced GTX 980M, GTX 1060 replaced GTX 970M, GTX 1050 Ti replaced GTX 965M and GTX 1050 replaced GTX 960M as below table.

We strongly recommend users to buy GTX 10 series platform notebooks because it’s not only performance difference, but also big difference in VR and architecture. That’s more important because the graphics industry is not only for hard core gaming now, the new Pascal architecture of GTX 10 series graphics Core got more advantage on latest DirectX 12 gaming and VR experience enhancement, it’s up to 30%~50% more than old Maxwell Core of GTX 9 series in all means.

GTX 10 Graphics Wins A Lot at Real Gaming Experience

Let’s take a look into the GTX 10 GPUs and GTX 9 GPUs comparison with the latest gaming experience. On the online game of “For Honor” you need GTX 1050 to play it over 40FPS with Ultra Detail, but for advanced gamers you need 60FPS to make sure every game play smoother to prevent lag with online actions. That means you need to choose a gaming notebook with GTX 1050 Ti.

With «Far Cry Primal» games, you need GTX 1060 graphics to make sure most gaming experience keep over 60FPS or at least GTX 1050 to play over 30FPS, with «Rise of the Tomb Raider» and «The Witcher 3» also the same heavy loading requirement. And these games are just in Full HD resolution; so even don’t need to mention if you want to play with higher resolution. That shows the latest GTX 1050 Ti seems to be a basic standard of 2017 gaming notebook for normal gamers. The last and most heavy loading game example is «Watch Dogs 2», if you want to play this game at FHD Ultra Preset with 60FPS to play it smoother, you really need to have GTX 1070 Graphics with your powerful gaming notebook. That’s a high standard in 2017 but soon will be basic requirement in upcoming 2018.

MSI Gaming Notebooks with GTX 10 Graphics could Give You More!

Since you decide to buy a new gaming notebook, you should by a good one which is ready to play most of games form year of 2017 to 2018 even 2019, because it’s a big investment for most of users and gamers. So there are more important points you need to aware about.

The GT73VR Titan and GT83VR Titan designed for Extreme Gamers and Users that comes with “Cooler Boost Titan” cooling design, GT73VR designed with 2 extreme performance 9cm fans and 10~12 which is capable to have great performance with GTX 1070 SLI or single GTXX 1080. And GT83VR is the best 4K gaming model comes with GTX 1080 SLI with 3 extreme fans and 15 heatipipes of the “Cooler Boost Titan” thermal design.

GT72/62VR Dominator are also the powerful models with OC capability with GTX 1070 and GTX 1060 graphics, their cooling module comes with 2 extreme fans and 7 heatpipes of the best “Cooler Boost 4” design.

If you search for ultra slim but still powerful gaming notebooks, you must look into MSI GS series, the “Cooler Boost Trinity” of cooling design comes with 3 fans and 5 heatpipes in a 5mm height of range, that’s how MSI kept their GS63 and GS73 with stable performance with GTX 1060 and still could overclock the GPU to get 5%~10% higher performance, and still you will have stable system. The GS63 and GS43 did not sacrifice the HDD, MSI still installed 1TB or 2TB HDD inside these ultra slim gaming notebooks like no others.

With MSI gaming notebooks, 1st priority is the cooling system, the cooler design on GE, GP and GL models all comes with 2x powerful fans and 6 heatpipes as “Cooler Boost 4”, that’s why even the GL series could keep very good performance for entry level users and gamers.

Please remember, MSI gaming notebooks could always keep highest performance on any segment because of the best cooling design, so if choose other so-called slim gaming notebook but comes, you might get lower performance in your games compared with my gaming benchmarks.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 126 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI runs with the minimal clock speed 924 MHz. It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to 950 MHz. The manufacturer has equipped NVIDIA with GB of 2x 4 GB memory, clock speed 5000 MHz and bandwidth .

The power consumption of the graphics card is , and the fabrication process is only 28 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.

Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.

0.0
Out of 0
Hitesti score

Popular graphics cards

Most viewed

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel UHD Graphics 600

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 520

DE

Buy here:

AliExpress

General info

The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.

Place in performance rating:		176
Architecture:		Maxwell
Type:		Laptop
Release date:		5 January 2015 (6 years ago)
Price now:		$149
Value for money:		43.04
Market segment:		Laptop

Technical specs

This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).

Pipelines:		2048
Core clock speed:		924 MHz
Boost Clock:		950 MHz
Transistor count:		2x 5200 Million
Manufacturing process technology:		28 nm
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		2048
Boost clock speed:		950 MHz
Number of transistors:		2x 5200 Million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.

Laptop size:		large
SLI options:		+

Memory

The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI.

Memory type:		GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount:		2x 4 GB
Memory bus width:		128 Bit
Memory clock speed:		5000 MHz
Shared memory:		—

Technologies

Each graphic card manufacturer complements its products with branded technologies that are used both in games and in the working process. Below is the list of peculiar features that you may find rather useful.

GPU Boost:		+
CUDA:		+
GeForce Experience:		+
Optimus:		+
GeForce ShadowPlay:		+
BatteryBoost:		+

API support

All API-supported NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI are listed below.

DirectX:

DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0

Overall gaming performance

All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).

Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Legend
5	Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
	May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
30	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more
40	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more
	May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to show fluent frame rates.
?	Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value.

AMD equivalent

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Compare

Benchmark

Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.

Overall benchmark performance

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

36.65%

AMD Radeon RX 470

36.57%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

36.37%

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

36.37%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI

36.37%

Multi-platform Ice Storm test shows the videocard performance by using the off-screen rendering method. Standard testing conditions are 1280*720 (720p).

AMD Radeon Pro 560X

255217

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

252549

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

250259

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

247306

NVIDIA Quadro P600

243785

Unlike Ice Storm, Cloud Gate test elaborated by 3DMark employs more resource-intensive scenes. The better the final estimation, the faster your videocard is. The processing is carried out by means of DirectX 10.

AMD Radeon R9 280X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 380

This is an advanced videocard benchmark. With DirectX 11 being used for conducting the processing, the normal testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the estimation, the faster the videocard is.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

This benchmark analyzes the videocard’s game power with the use of Direct X 11 (multi-threading, tessellation, shader computations).

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

0.0
Out of 0
Hitesti score

Share on social network:

In order to leave a review you need to log in

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

 

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Intel HD Graphics 3000

Intel HD Graphics 620

NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

AMD Radeon Pro 560X

NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165

Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti which is better?

General information
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
n/a	59.7%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Codename
GM204	GP107
Type
Notebook	Desktop
Release price
n/a	139 $
Number of shaders
1024 256 (33.3%) better than	768
Core clock
944MHz	1291 MHz At 347 MHz (36.8%) better than
Boost frequency
950 MHz	1392 MHz At 442 MHz (46.5%) better than
Number of transistors
5. 200 million	3.300 million
Process
28 nm	14 nm -14 nm (-50%) better than
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
50 W -25 W (-33.3%) better than	75 W
Length
n/a	145 mm
Additional power connectors
no	no
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.
Multi Monitor
n/a	+
SLI support
+	n/a
3D Vision
n/a	+
GPU Boost
+	n/a
GeForce Experience
+	n/a
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies.
no data	+
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
n/a	+
CUDA The presence of the CUDA architecture allows the use of applications that are optimized for parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously.
n/a	+
Maximum temperature
n/a	97 °C
Ansel
Decred / DCR (Decred)
n/a	1.01 Gh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
n/a	1 Sol/s
Bus
PCI Express 3. 0	n/a
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, especially affect anti-aliasing and lighting in games, the speed of training neural networks.
1024 256 (33.3%) better than	768
GameStream
+	n/a
GeForce ShadowPlay
GameWorks
HDMI
OpenCL
1.1	n/a
BatteryBoost
+	n/a
VGA 9 analog monitor support0011
+	n/a
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+	n/a
Video decoder H. 264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p
+	n/a
DSR
+	no data
Video connectors
No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DirectX
12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Floating point performance
2.355 gflops	2.138 gflops
Optimus
+	n/a
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
n/a	12.62 Mh/s

Memory
Memory type
GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.
128bit	128 bit
Shared memory
—	—
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
2500 MHz	7008 MHz At 4508 MHz (180.3%) better than
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.
80	112 32 (40%) better than

Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (mobile) which is better?

General information
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
n/a	99.8%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Codename
GM204	GP107
Type
Notebook	For laptops
Number of shaders
1024 256 (33.3%) better than	768
Core clock
944MHz	1493 MHz At 549 MHz (58.2%) better than
Boost frequency
950 MHz	1620 MHz At 670 MHz (70.5%) better than
Number of transistors
5.200 million	3. 300 million
Process
28 nm	14 nm -14 nm (-50%) better than
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
50W -25 W (-33.3%) better than	75 W
Additional power connectors
no	n/a
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.
Multi Monitor
n/a	+
SLI support
+	n/a
3D Vision
n/a	+
GPU Boost
+	n/a
GeForce Experience
+	n/a
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
n/a	+
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously.
n/a	+
Maximum temperature
n/a	97 °C
Ansel
Bus
PCI Express 3.0	no data
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, especially affect anti-aliasing and lighting in games, the speed of training neural networks.
1024 256 (33.3%) better than	768
GameStream
+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay
GameWorks
HDMI
OpenCL
1.1	n/a
BatteryBoost
+	n/a
VGA analog monitor support
+	n/a
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+	no data
Video decoder H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p
+	n/a
DSR
+	n/a
Video connectors
No outputs	No outputs
DirectX
12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Floating point performance
2. 355 gflops	n/a
Optimus
+	n/a

Memory
Memory type
GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games.
128bit	128 bit
Shared memory
—	—
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
2500MHz At 2493 MHz (35614.3%) better than	7 MHz
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.
80	112 32 (40%) better than

GTX 1050 Ti with Phenom II X4 965 benchmarks in Ultra quality settings

Compare with
Select..AMD Radeon HD 6850 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6870 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6950 — RUB 16,398AMD Radeon HD 6970 — RUB 19,619 RUB 45,847AMD Radeon HD 7750 — RUB 9,183AMD Radeon HD 7750M — RUB 56,276AMD Radeon HD 7790 — RUB 9,773AMD Radeon HD 7850 — RUB 16,332AMD Radeon HD 7850M — RUB 63,229AMD Radeon HD 7950 — RUB.773AMD Radeon HD 7950M — Rs. 67,099AMD Radeon HD 7970 — Rs. 19,611AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — Rs. 19,611AMD Radeon HD 7970M — Rs. — ₽ 46,569AMD Radeon R5 — ₽ 45,979AMD Radeon R7 250 — ₽ 6,231AMD Radeon R7 265 — ₽ 9,773AMD Radeon R7 370 — ₽ 13,249AMD Radeon R9 270 — ₽ 18,037AMD Radeon R9 280 — ₽18,037AMD Radeon R9 280 — ₽25 AMD AMD Radeon R9 285 — RUB 24,924 AMD Radeon R9 290 — RUB 20,333AMD Radeon R9 290X — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon R9295x2 — ₽ 98,319AMD Radeon R9 380 — ₽ 19,611amd Radeon R9 380x — ₽ 15. 020AMD Radeon R9 390 — ₽ 30,4999AMD Radeon R9 390X — ₽ 32,467AMD Radeon R9 Fury — ₽ 36,00amd Radeon R9 Fury X — ₽ 42.5 Fury X — ₽ 42.5 Fury x — ₽ 42.5 Fury Fury M270X — ₽ 66,639AMD Radeon R9 M280X — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M290X — ₽ 79,298AMD Radeon R9 M380 — ₽ 70,444AMD Radeon R9 Nano — ₽ 100,287AMD Radeon RX 460 — ₽ 9,183AMD Radeon RX Radeon RX 470 Mobile — RUB 42,306 AMD Radeon RX 480 — RUB 26,170 AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — RUB 83,627AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — RUB 42,306AMD RX 550 — RUB RX 480 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — RUB 11,085AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 560 — RUB 6.493AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $64,737AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $18,300AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $42,043AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $64,737 RX 5700 — RUB 22,891AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon RX 580 — RUB 9,904AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 590 — RUB 36 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT — RUB 31,418AMD Radeon RX 6800 — RUB 37,977AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — RUB 42,568AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $65,524AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $41,453AMD ​​Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $37,190AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $73,395AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $39,420AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17. 64 Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17.64 Mobile — ₽ 103,567AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — ₽ 27,482AMD Radeon VII — ₽ 43,552ATI Radeon HD 4870 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — ₽ 84,086NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — ₽ 49,193NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — ₽ 69,657NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 83,299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — ₽ 57,457NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — ₽ 11,150NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — ₽ 10,429NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — ₽ 72,543NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — ₽ 102,255NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — ₽ 32,992NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — ₽ 34,238NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — ₽ 128,229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — ₽ 121,801NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — ₽ 52,931NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — ₽ 9,773NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — ₽ 81,266NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — ₽ 75,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — ₽ 10,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — ₽ 15,020NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — ₽ 115,307NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — ₽ 42,568NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — ₽ 10,035NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — ₽ 22,891NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — ₽ 3,214NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — ₽ 4,198NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — ₽ 11,085NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — ₽ 31,811NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — ₽ 71,034NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — ₽ 28,794 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — ₽ 20,989NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — ₽ 67,951NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — ₽ 11,741NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — ₽ 72,149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — ₽ 23,285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — ₽ 26,892NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — ₽ 69,919NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — ₽ 40,600NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — ₽ 42,634NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — ₽ 65,524NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — ₽ 72,083 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $22. 891NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — ₽ 72,411NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — ₽ 26,236NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — ₽ 30,762NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — ₽ 99,434NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — ₽ 113,077NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — ₽ 45,454NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — ₽ 116,226NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — ₽ 127,376NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — ₽ 77,855NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $16,332NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — ₽ 39,288NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $163,909NVIDIA TITAN V — $196,704NVIDIA TITAN Xp — ₽ 78,642

Change CPU to
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — RUB 6555.7AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — RUB 1967AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — RUB 8523.4 — RUB 23609.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — RUB 30168.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — RUB 21742.4AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 6DAM56 5400+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ X2 Dual Core 5600+ — RUB 9835.2AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — RUB 1639.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — RUB 3013.9AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — RUB 17050.1AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — RUB 3935.4 AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 6231.1AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 786.4AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 2111.3 II X2 255 — RUB 4277.8AMD Athlon II X2 260 — RUB 1311.1AMD Athlon II X2 265 — RUB 5436.1AMD Athlon II X2 270 — RUB 1573.5AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — RUB 2358AMD Athlon II X2AMD II2 X20. — ₽ 3217.2AMD Athlon II X3 425 — ₽ 6835.1AMD Athlon II X3 435 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon II X3 440 — ₽ 3079.5AMD ATHLON II X3 445 — ₽ 5968.7AMD athlon II X3 450 — ₽ 2622. 9AMD ATHLON II X3 455 — ₽ 7664.2AMD ATHLON II X3 460 — ₽ 3278.8AMD ATHO X4 620 — ₽ 3932.1AMD ATHLON 28 Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 5247.2AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 4588AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 5243.9AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 6001.5 — ₽ 18168.4AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — ₽ 3017.1AMD Athlon X4 840 — ₽ 5164.6AMD Athlon X4 845 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon X4 860K — ₽ 4196.4AMD ATHLON X4 870K — ₽ 5246.5AMD Athlon X4 880K — ₽ 5902.4AMD ATHLON X4 950 — ₽ 3934.7AMD E2-3200 APU — ₽ 524.1AMD FX -4100 Quad -Core — ₽ 8526AMD FX -4130 QUAD -₽ 4984. FX-4170 Quad-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — RUB 14968.3AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — RUB 3501.9AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — RUB 22297.3FX -6300 Six-Core — RUB 3869.2AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — RUB 25153.8AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — RUB 5285.9AMD 8320 Eight-Core — ₽ 5214.4AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — ₽ 6484.9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — RUB 5246.5 AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — RUB 8853. 3AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — RUB 11805.5 Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — ₽ 3082.1AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — ₽ 1964.4AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — ₽ 221830AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — ₽ 6887AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — ₽ 3934.7AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — ₽ 3276.2AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — ₽ 9654.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — ₽AMD-Core 360 ₽ 3932.1AMD Phenom 9850 Quad -Core — ₽ 3279.5AMD Phenom 9950 Quad -Core — ₽ 11804.9AMD Phenom II X2 545 — ₽ 2884.6AMD Phenom II X2 550 — ₽ 3278.8AMD PHENOM II X2 555 — ₽ 9323AMD PEN 1967AMD Phenom II X2 B550.6AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — ₽ 4919.3AMD Phenom II X4 805 — ₽ 11412AMD Phenom II X4 810 — ₽ 7607.8AMD Phenom II X4 820 — ₽ 4916AMD Phenom II X4 840 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X4 905E — ₽ 13 905E — ₽ 13 910 — ₽ 65559AMD Phenom II X4 910e — ₽ 10297AMD Phenom II X4 920 — ₽ 4393. 9AMD Phenom II X4 925 — ₽ 10493.7AMD Phenom II X4 940 — ₽ 7870.1AMD PHENOM II X4 945 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd AMD Phenom II X4 960T — RUB 8854 AMD Phenom II X4 965 — RUB 3902.6AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — RUB 4784.8AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — ₽ 12396.5AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — ₽ 11478.3AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — ₽ 12134.2AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — ₽ 17052.7AMD PHENOM II X6 1090T — ₽ 259978.90T — ₽ 259978.90T ₽ 13117.3AMD Phenom X3 8550 — ₽ 11147AMD RYZEN 3 1200 — ₽ 6230.4AMD RYZEN 3 1300X — ₽ 8198.1AMD RYZEN 3 2200G — ₽ 6427.2AMD RYZEN 3 3100 — ₽ 5903.1AMD RYZEN 3 3200G — ₽ 6493.4AMD RYZEN 3300 — AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 8789.1AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 9503.3AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 10165.8AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 11701.3837.8AMD RYZEN 5 2600X — ₽ 13773.2AMD RYZEN 5 3400G — ₽ 9837.8AMD RYZEN 5 3500 — ₽ 9707.3AMD RYZEN 5 3500X — ₽ 10527.2AMD RYZEN 5 3600 — ₽ 13052.4AMD RYZEN 5 3600X — ₽ 16331. AMD RYZEN 5 5600X — ₽ 19611.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700 — ₽ 12461.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700X — ₽ 13117.3AMD RYZEN 7 1800X — ₽ 16396.8AMD RYZEN 7 2700 — ₽ 16347AMD RYZEN 7 2700X — ₽ 20004.3AMD RYZEN 7, 3700X — ₽ ₽ ₽ ¦ 3800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — RUB 19676.3AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — RUB 29514.8AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — ₽ 49192.5AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — ₽ 46568.9AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — ₽ 22955.8AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — ₽ 27547.1AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — ₽ 44600.5 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — ₽ 59030.3AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — ₽ 112814.1Intel Core i3-10100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-10300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-11100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-11300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-12100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-12300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3934.7Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 3804.2Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 5246.5Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 1967.7Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 13052. 2Intel Core0 @ 3.40GHz — $ 4590.6Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 2289.1Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 5246.5 Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 6230.4 Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9181.9 3.60GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — Rs. 9837.8Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 11805.5Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 3.70GHz — $18361.9Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $29513.5Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $1311.8Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $1377.4Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $1377.4 Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 1966.4Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8772Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — RUB 10895.2Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 9Intel Core i3-7320 @ 3.90GHz Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8526 i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 6886.3Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 10625.6Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 14691.537.4 Intel Core i5-10600K — $15533.7 Intel Core i5-11400 — $11937.4 Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 17184. 6 ₽ 5246.5Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 5245.9Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 12806.4Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ tel5 Core508.9 2400S @ 2.50GHz — $4309.3 Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $10783Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $6886.3 Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — ₽ 4918.6Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — Rs. 8526Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — Rs. 2.80GHz — $ 9837.8 Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 8394.9 Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9188.5 Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9412.2 GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 9444.3Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — RUB 18693.2Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 11805.5Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core05 @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 30366.2Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2. 90GHz — $ 43288.7 Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $14536.7 Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $12133.5Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $12986.2 3.40GHz — ₽ 16396.8Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 18102.8Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 13117.3Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — Rs. @ 3.10GHz — $ 26235.3 Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 13117.3 Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 12461.4 Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 3213.9 Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 14429.148.3Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — Rs. 5902.4Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 2.67GHz — $ 10527.2 Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 13773.2 Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 6558.3 ​​Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 15739.6 Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $16396.8 Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $15676 GHz — ₽ 24770.1Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2. 90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 18364.5 i7-11700K — $ 26891.9Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 30826.6Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9837.2 -2700K @ 3.50GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $11740Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $16330.6Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3820 13117.3Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 26169.1Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — RUB 52471.3Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — RUB 62572.2Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 15740.9Intel Core i7-4770K 20tel Core135 3.20GHz — RUB 22470.5 Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 32794.3 Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 26169.1514.8Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — RUB 19676.3Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — RUB 32728.1Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — RUB 50503.6Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 28444 Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 27547.1 Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — RUB 36073.8 Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 21325.3 Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — RUB 23283.8 Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4. 30GHz — RUB 22890.3 GHz — ₽ 60998Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — Rs. Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.70GHz -930 @ 2.80GHz — $3934.7Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $4637.2Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $16069.6Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $6558.3Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9181.9Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9837.2Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 21644 Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 11805.5 Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 13116.7 Intel Core i7-980X @ ​​3.33GHz — RUB 14428.5 ₽ 38698.1Intel Core i9-11900K — ₽ 32007.9Intel Core i9-12900K — ₽ 38697.4Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz — ₽

.5Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 71932.6 Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 78191.2 Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 131179.3 i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 54767Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — ₽ 587Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — ₽ 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — ₽ 6559Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — ₽ 852Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1. 86GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 1308.5Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 980.6Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 983.2Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 849.4Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — ₽ 4919.3 Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $1311.1 Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $1901.5 Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 983.2 Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz — RUB 1311.1Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 642.1Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — RUB 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 73788.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 98119.4Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 17292.1Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 59621.3 Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 105531Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 118452.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 2622.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2950. 9Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 1507.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — RUB 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — RUB 6526.2Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2228.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 21972.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 12462.1Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 3213.3Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 4576.9Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2288.4Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 2155.3Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 2688.5Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3016.5Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 7867.5Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 11693.4Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 6886.3Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 10490.5Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3. 40GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 18903Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6840.4Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 5592.2Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 7273.3Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 6763.6Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 6943.4Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 1639.1Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 6231.1Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 6362.2Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 8123.3Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.80GHz — ₽ 6580Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — ₽ 6618

Change Variant To
Select..AFOX GTX 1050 TiAFOX GTX 1050 Ti V2ASL GTX 1050 Ti Battle FlagASL GTX 1050 Ti SkynetASL GTX 1050 Ti SkynetASL GTX 1050 Ti Skynet War FlagASL GTX 1050 Ti Soar DragonASL GTX 1050 Ti WolverineASL GTX 1050 Ti WolverineASL TiBERUS CERBERUS GTX 10 1050 Ti OCASUS DUAL GTX 1050 TiASUS DUAL GTX 1050 Ti OCASUS DUAL GTX 1050 Ti OC V2ASUS EXPEDITION GTX 1050 TiASUS EXPEDITION GTX 1050 Ti OCASUS PHOENIX GTX 1050 TiASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1050 Ti GAMING OCAxigon GTX 1050 Ti GhostBIOSTAR GTX 1050 TiBIIOSTAR GTX 1050 Ti Dual CoolingColorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGColorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMING V2Colorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMING V3Colorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMING V5Colorful GTX 1050 Ti Low ProfileColorful GTX 1050 Ti Mini OCColorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart SharkColorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart Shark V35Colorful GTX1 Shark V5Colorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart Shark-LEColorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart Shark-LE V2Colorful GTX 1050 Ti TomahawkColorful GTX 1050 Ti Tomahawk V2Colorf ul iCafe GTX 1050 TiColorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGColorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti GreenColorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti Green V2Colorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti V2Colorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Fire Ares SColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Flame Ares UColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Flame Ares ULE GTX 1050 Ti Flame Ares U-TOPColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Frozen Knight MiniColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Vulcan UColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Vulcan U ECDigital Alliance GTX 1050 Ti Dual OCDigital Alliance GTX 1050 Ti StormXELSA GTX 1050 Ti S. A.CEMTEK HV GTX 1050 Ti GAMER OCEVGA GTX 1050 Ti ACX 2.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti FTW ACX 3.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti FTW DT ACX 3.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti Low Profile ACX 2.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti0GA050 Ti SSC ACX 3.0FORSA GTX 1050 TiGALAX GTX 1050 Ti BlackGALAX GTX 1050 Ti EXOCGALAX GTX 1050 Ti EXOC WhiteGALAX GTX 1050 Ti GAMERGALAX GTX 1050 Ti GeneralGALAX GTX 1050 Ti OCGALAX GTX 1050 Ti OC Low ProfileGALAX GTX 1050 Ti Tig erGALAX GTX 1050 Ti Tiger V2GIGABYTE GTX 1050 TiGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti G1 GamingGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti OCGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti OC Low ProfileGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti WindForce X2 OCGainward GTX 1050 TiGainward GTX 1050 Ti GaleGainward GTX 1050 Ti Gale EXGainward GTX 1050 Ti Gale RGBGainward GTX 1050 Ti HurricaneGainward GTX 1050 Ti ListenGainward GTX 1050 Ti WindGainward GTX 1050 Ti Wind V2Gainward GTX 1050 Ti Wind V3Gainward GTX 1050 Ti Wind-PInno3D GTX 1050 Ti 1-Slot EditionInno3D GTX 1050 Ti1 CompactInno3D GTX 1050 Ti Twin Compact Lineage IIIGATX 0 GTX 1050 X5 GAMINGKFA2 GTX 1050 Ti OCKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1050 Ti OCKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1050 Ti OCKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1050 Ti OC LPLeadtek WinFast GTX 1050 TiLeadtek WinFast GTX 1050 Ti Rev. MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Gaming Edition Ti Terminator FrostFireMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Terminator M.2MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Terminator M.3MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Terminator M.4MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti TransformersMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti i-CafeMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti i-Cafe Limited EditionMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti i-Cafe Limited EditionMSI GTX 1050 TiMSI GTX 1050 Ti AERO ITXMSI GTX 1050 Ti AERO ITX OCMSI GTX 1050 Ti AERO ITX OCV1MSI GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGMSI GTX 1050 Ti GAMING XMSI GTX 1050 Ti LPMSI GTX 1050 Ti OCMSI GTX 1050 Ti OCManli GTX 1050 Ti F352GManli GTX 1050 Ti F365GManli GTX 1050 Ti GallardoONDA GTX 1050 Ti AegisONDA GTX 1050 Ti Aegis v2.0ONDA GTX 1050 Ti Aegis v3.0ONDA GTX 1050 Ti ClassicONDA GTX 1050 Ti Model PIOPNY GTX 1050 TiPNY XLR8 GTX 1050 Ti Gaming OCPalit GTX 1050 Ti DualPalit GTX 1050 Ti Dual OCPalit GTX 1050 Ti KalmXPalit GTX 1050 Ti StormXPoint of View GTX 1050 TiVeineda GTX 1050 TiViewMax GTX 1050 Ti Cyborg AssassinYeston GTX 1050 Ti GAEAYeston GTX 1050 Ti Speed ​​EditionZOGIS GTX 1050 TiZOGIS GTX 1050 Ti SuperClockZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Destroyer OCZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Galactic PAZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Galactic PBZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Low ProfileZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti MiniZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Mini Low ProfileZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition HYZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder TSI PAZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder TSI SMZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti X-Gaming OC

Desired tuning quality
Select. .Ultra quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium qualityLow quality

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB. Comparative specs and benchmarks of

VS

General information

The general information section of the video card comparison list contains release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB. Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.

176

Position in the performance rating

136

No data

The price ratio

58.53

Maxwell

Architecture

Pascal

No data no data0011

GP106

Laptop

Market segment

Desktop

Technical specifications GPU is the most important part contained in the video card rating.

2048

Conveyors

1152

965M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

No data

Interface

PCIE 3.0 X16

No data

length

250 MM

Additional power

1x 6-pin

Laptop size

n.a.

+

SLI options

n.a. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB:

GDDR5

Memory type

GDDR5

2x 4 GB

0 Maximum amount 1

3 GB

128 Bit

Memory bus width

192 Bit

5000 MHz

Memory frequency

8008 MHZ

No data

Memory Proceeds

192.2 GB/S

—

Separated memory

No data

Support Supply

We will find out the difference in ports, which are rysts. 965M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.

N/A

Display connections

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

N/A

HDMI

+

Technology

Let’s see what the difference is It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.

+

GPU BOOST

No data

+

CUDA

No data

+

GEFORCE EXPERIENCE

9 DAY

900A0011

GeForce ShadowPlay

n.a.

+

BatteryBoost

n.a. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0

DirectX

12 (12_1) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB 2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 four. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB 7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon RX 590 eight. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB 9. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q ten. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon RX 580 eleven. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon HD 7970 12. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon 630 13. AMD Radeon RX 560 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB fourteen. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 fifteen. AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI Overview. Benchmarks and specs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI (GPU) is ranked #126 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. Runs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI with a minimum clock speed of 924 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or when overclocked at a frequency of 950 MHz. RAM size — 2x 4 GB GB with a clock speed of 5000 MHz and a bandwidth of .

The power consumption of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI is , and the process technology is only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.

Let’s take a closer look at the key features of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI. To have an idea of ​​which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.

0.0
From 0
Hitesti Grade

Popular video cards

Most viewed

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel UHD Graphics 600

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 520

DE

Buy here:

AliExpress

General information

The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.

Performance Rating Position:		176
Architecture:		Maxwell
Type:		Laptop
Release date:		5 January 2015 (6 years ago)
Current price:		$149
Value for money:		43.04
Market segment:		Laptop

Specifications

This is important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI graphics card. The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).

Conveyors:		2048
Core Clock:		924MHz
Acceleration:		950MHz
Number of transistors:		2x 5200 Million
Process:		28 nm
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		2048
Acceleration speed:		950MHz
Number of transistors:		2x 5200 Million

Dimensions, Connectors and Compatibility

There are so many form factors for PC cases and laptop sizes today that it’s important to know the length of your graphics card and how it’s connected (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.

Laptop size:		large
SLI options:		+

Memory (Frequency and Overclocking)

Internal memory is used to store data during calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI + turbo overclocking capability.

Memory type:		GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount:		2x 4GB
Memory bus width:		128 Bit
Memory frequency:		5000 MHz
Shared memory:		—

Technologies

Each graphics card manufacturer complements its products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow. Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.

GPU Boost:		+
CUDA:		+
GeForce Experience:		+
Optimus:		+
GeForce ShadowPlay:		+
Battery Boost:		+

API Support

All APIs supported by NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.

DirectX:

DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0

General gaming performance

All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at where the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI ranks in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).

Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed ​​HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed ​​PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Description
5	Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
	May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
30	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more
40	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more
	May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
?	Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene.
	Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value.

AMD equivalent

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI in benchmark results

Benchmarks help determine performance in standard NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI benchmarks. We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.

Overall performance in benchmarks

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

36.65%

AMD Radeon RX 470

36.57%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

36.37%

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

36.37%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI

36.37%

The Ice Storm multi-platform test shows the performance of a graphics card using the screen rendering method. Standard test conditions — 1280*720 (720p).

AMD Radeon Pro 560X

255217

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

252549

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

250259

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

247306

NVIDIA Quadro P600

243785

Unlike Ice Storm, 3DMark’s Cloud Gate test uses more resource intensive scenes. The better the final score, the faster your graphics card. Processing is done with DirectX 10.

AMD Radeon R9 280X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 380

This is an advanced graphics card benchmark. When using DirectX 11 for processing, typical testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the score, the faster the graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

This benchmark analyzes the gaming power of a graphics card using Direct X 11 (multithreading, tessellation, shader calculations).

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

0.0
From 0
Hitesti Grade

Share on social networks:

In order to leave a review, you need to log in

Review NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Intel HD Graphics 3000

Intel HD Graphics 620

NVIDIA GeForce 6200LE

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

AMD Radeon RX 5600XT

AMD Radeon Pro 560X

NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165

MSI Russia

{{blogList.tagContent}}

{{blogList.blogTitle}}

By {{blogList.blogAuthor}}
|
{{bloglist.date}}

In 2017, NVIDIA introduced the GTX10 series mobile gaming graphics platform. Despite this, more than 50% of laptops on the market in the mid-range and low price segment still use GTX9 series graphics.. The transition to next generation mobile graphics should be as follows: GTX 1050 replaces GTX960M, GTX 1050 Ti replaces GTX 965M, GTX 1060 replaces GTX 970M, GTX 1070 replaces GTX 980M, GTX 1080 replaces GTX 980.

GTX950M even if they are cheaper!

They use a legacy graphics architecture where the GTX960M and GTX950M are essentially overclocked versions of the GTX860M and GTX850M. Since the GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1050 have been on the market for several months now, serious gamers and advanced users need to know that buying a laptop with GTX 10 graphics, even if it costs a little more money, is indeed the right and smart choice.

GTX 10 series based on Pascal architecture and 5 new generation technologies!

One of the benefits of the Pascal architecture is the new 16nm FINFET workflow for all GPUs. This made it possible to reduce the temperature of the GPU, reduce the size of the crystal and, as a result, the size of the printed circuit board. Due to the 16nm process technology, the core frequency of the GTX 10 series GPU has increased from 1000MHz of the GTX 9 series to 1500MHz and higher. So a real performance boost over the old GTX 9 seriesincreased by more than 30%.

The third benefit of the GTX 10 series is the new NVLINK architecture inside the video core. The revolutionary design of the video processor core allowed for a 5x increase in throughput and multi-threaded computing. HBM2 architecture memory takes GPU computing speed to the next level with 3x more bandwidth than the old Maxwell used in the GTX 9. For gamers and designers who use a high resolution picture, this is really important.

Last but not least, in the new Pascal architecture, NVIDIA uses AI algorithms that not only help improve gaming performance, but are also a big step forward when it comes to math calculations.

This allows you to use all the features of the new DirectX 12 in games. The performance gain in points in DirectX 12, in the case of a direct comparison with DirectX 11, is from 30% to 50%, but you should remember that the architecture of the old 3D Mark 11 test does not reflect the real performance in modern games and applications of virtual reality.

Performance in games based on DX12 as well as in virtual reality applications is significantly better on GTX 10 GPUs

Looking at the old Maxwell architecture used in the GTX 9 series of GPUs, we can see the 28nm process, higher operating temperatures, and lower GPU frequencies. The GTX 9 series were high performance graphics for their time. In the table below, you can see that the GTX 1080 has already replaced the GTX 980, the GTX 1070 has replaced the GTX 980M, the GTX 1060 has replaced the GTX 970M, the GTX 1050 Ti has replaced the GTX 965M, and the GTX 1050 has replaced the GTX 960M.

We strongly recommend that users buy laptops with GTX 10 graphics platform, not only because of the better performance in PC games and virtual reality applications, but also because of the new architecture. It is important to understand that today the computing power of graphics cards is used not only in traditional computer games. Due to the new Pascal architecture in the GTX 10 series of GPUs, performance in 3D applications and virtual environments on the latest DirectX 12 is on average 30%-50% higher compared to the Maxwell core in the GTX 9 series.

GTX 10 Graphics Wins by a Big margin

Let’s compare the GTX 10 and GTX 9 GPUs in the latest PC games. In the online game “For Honor”, ​​you need a GTX 1050 to play at least 40FPS and ultra high details. But advanced users need at least 60FPS for maximum fluidity and to avoid lag in online battles. This means you need a gaming laptop with GTX 1050 Ti graphics.

To comfortably play Far Cry Primal at 60FPS, you’ll need a GTX 1060 or at least a GTX 1050 to get 30FPS. The same can be said about the games «Rise of the Tomb Raider» and «The Witcher 3». It should be noted that we are talking about gameplay at Full HD resolution, so there is no need to mention what will happen if you go to play at a higher resolution. This is clearly visible on the latest GTX 1050 Ti graphics, which has become the standard for most gaming laptops in 2017. One of the latest and quite resource-intensive PC games, Watch Dogs 2, requires your gaming laptop to have a GTX 1070 if you want 60FPS and smooth gameplay on ultra settings. Although this is considered to be a very productive solution today, next year, the presence of such graphics will already be a standard requirement.

MSI Gaming Laptop with Graphics can give you even more!

If you decide to buy a new gaming laptop, then you should choose a sufficiently powerful device on which you can comfortably play games not only in 2017, but 2018 and even 2019. What else you need to remember.

The GT73VR Titan and GT83VR Titan are designed for extreme gamers. For effective cooling, laptops use the “Cooler Boost Titan” solution. The GT73VR model uses 2 high-performance fans with a diameter of 9cm and 10~12cm, which can achieve the high performance of GTX 1070 in SLI, or one GTXX 1080. GT83VR laptop is the best solution for 4K gaming, equipped with two GTX 1080 installed in SLI mode, has three powerful fans and 15 heat pipes.

GT72/62VR Dominators are also quite powerful models with overclocking capability. The cooling system of the GTX 1070 or GTX 1060 video card has two extremely powerful fans and 7 heat pipes.

If you’re looking for an ultra thin yet powerful gaming laptop, take a look at the MSI GS series. The cooling system “Cooler Boost Trinity” is 5 mm high, has 3 fans and 5 heat pipes. Thanks to this, MSI GS63 and GS73 notebooks have stable performance of GTX 1060 and can overclock CPU GPU with up to 5%~10% performance increase while maintaining stability. Models GS63 and GS43, unlike many other ultra-thin gaming laptops, have a full hard drive of 1 or 2TB.

One of the main advantages of MSI gaming laptops is the cooling system. Models of the GE, GP and GL series are equipped with 2 powerful fans and 6 heat pipes, forming the so-called “Cooler Boost 4” cooling system.