GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1060
-
GeForce GTX 965M
100%
-
GeForce GTX 1060
220%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 965M |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1060 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Around 120% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1060 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | GM204 (N16E-GS-KAB-A1) | vs | GP106 (GP106-400-A1) | |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 16 nm | |
| Die Size | 398 mm² | vs | 200 mm² | |
| Transistors | 5,200 million | vs | 4,400 million | |
| Shaders | 1024 | vs | 1280 | |
| Compute Units | 8 | vs | 10 | |
| Core clock | 924 MHz | vs | 1506 MHz | |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 48 | |
| TMUs | 64 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1060 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 192 bit | |
| Memory Speed | 1253 MHz 5012 MHz effective |
vs | 2002 MHz 8008 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 6144 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1060 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 120 watts | |
| Release Date | 9 Jan 2015 | vs | 10 Jul 2016 |
-
GeForce GTX 965M
29.
57 GP/s -
GeForce GTX 1060
72.30 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 965M
59.10 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 1060
120.50 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 965M
80.20 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 1060
192.20 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 965M
1892.40 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 1060
3855.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 965M
7890
-
GeForce GTX 1060
17380
Points (higher is better)
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 580 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon R9 Nano |
| VS | ||
| Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon R9 FURY |
| VS | ||
| Radeon R9 FURY | Radeon R9 FURY X |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
GPU Specs, Prices, and FPS in Games
Refine results to filter 338 graphics cards by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a GPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Calculation Parameters
Processor
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Sort By
Popularity
Filters
Performance Rating
Value Rating
GPU Type
Desktop
25
Mobile
0
Integrated
0
Found 338 GPUs.
Popularity
Graphics Card
Performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Dec 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
$469.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Performance Rating
$389.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 2060
Jan 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$284.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
$356.86 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3060
Jan 12th, 2021
Performance Rating
$469 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
$649 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Performance Rating
$289 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Performance Rating
$150.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Performance Rating
$957.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Performance Rating
$89.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Performance Rating
$799.97 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
$2,249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GT 730
Jun 18th, 2014
Performance Rating
$69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6700
Jun 9th, 2021
Performance Rating
$359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Nov 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
$1,262.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Nov 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
$963.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
$1,391.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
$584.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Performance Rating
$108.
79 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Performance Rating
$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Performance Rating
$183.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Performance Rating
$198.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Performance Rating
$339.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Performance Rating
$299 on Amazon
In Stock
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile comparison, which is better?
| General information | |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. |
|
| n/a | 52.5% |
|
Architecture |
|
| Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
|
Codename |
|
| GM204 | GP106 |
|
Type |
|
| Notebook | For laptops |
|
Release price |
|
| n/a | 237.11 $ |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 1024 | 1280
256 (25%) better than |
|
Core clock |
|
| 944MHz | 1506 MHz
At 562 MHz (59.5%) better than |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| 950 MHz | 1708 MHz
At 758 MHz (79.8%) better than |
|
Number of transistors |
|
5. 200 million |
4.400 million |
|
Process |
|
| 28 nm | 16 nm
-12 nm (-42.9%) better than nine0006 |
|
Interface |
|
| MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 50W
-70 W (-58.3%) better than |
120 W |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| no | n/a |
|
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
|
Multi Monitor |
|
| n/a | + |
|
SLI support |
|
| + | n/a |
|
3D Vision |
|
| n/a | + |
|
GPU Boost |
|
| + | 3. 0 |
|
GeForce Experience |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies. |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
| n/a | + |
|
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
|
Surround |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Maximum temperature |
|
| n/a | 94 °C |
|
Multi-monitor support |
|
| n/a | 1 |
|
Ansel |
|
|
Virtual Reality |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Bus |
|
| PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
|
ShadowWorks |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
| 1024 | 1280
256 (25%) better than |
|
HDCP |
|
| n/a | 2. 2 |
|
GameStream |
|
| + | + |
|
GeForce ShadowPlay |
|
|
GameWorks |
|
|
HDMI |
|
|
OpenCL |
|
| 1.1 | n/a |
|
Battery Boost |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VGA analog monitor support |
|
| + | n/a |
|
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Video decoder H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p |
|
| + | n/a |
|
DSR |
|
| + | + |
|
Video connectors |
|
| No outputs | DP 1. 43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
|
DirectX |
|
| 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
|
Floating point performance |
|
| 2.355 gflops | 4.275 gflops |
|
Optimus |
|
| + | n/a |
The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. 
Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously. | Memory | |
|
Memory type |
|
| GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
|
Maximum memory A large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures, |
|
| 4 GB | 6 GB
2 GB (50%) better than |
|
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
| 128bit | 192 bit
64 bit (50%) better than |
|
Shared memory |
|
| — | — |
|
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
| 2500 MHz | |
|
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
| 80 | 192
112 (140%) better than |
nine0011 Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX
Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
|
Power Demand (TDP) |
|
50 W -70 W (-58.3%) better than vs 120 W |
|
Maximum memory capacity |
|
4 GB 1 GB (33. vs 3 GB |
3%) better than Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparison Winner
|
Number of shaders |
|
1152 128 (12.5%) better than vs 1024 |
|
Core frequency |
|
1506 MHz At 562 MHz (59.5%) better than vs 944 MHz |
|
Boost frequency |
|
1708 MHz At 758 MHz (79.8%) better than vs 950 MHz |
|
Process |
|
16 nm -12 nm (-42.9%) better than vs 28 nm |
|
Memory bus width |
|
192 bit 64 bit (50%) better than vs 128 bit |
|
Memory frequency |
|
8008 MHz At 5508 MHz (220. vs 2500 MHz |
|
Memory bandwidth |
|
192.2 112.2 (140.3%) better than vs 80 |
3%) better than | General information | |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| n/a | 54.1% |
|
Architecture |
|
| Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
|
Codename |
|
| GM204 | GP106 |
|
Type |
|
| Notebook | Desktop |
|
Release price |
|
| n/a | 199 $ |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 1024 | 1152 nine0010 128 (12.  5%) better than
|
|
Core clock |
|
| 944MHz | 1506 MHz
At 562 MHz (59.5%) better than |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| 950 MHz | 1708 MHz
At 758 MHz (79.8%) better than |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 5.200 million | 4.400 million |
|
Process |
|
| 28 nm | 16 nm
-12 nm (-42.9%) better than |
|
Interface |
|
| MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 50W
-70 W (-58.3%) better than |
120 W |
|
Length |
|
| n/a | |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| no | 1x 6-pin |
|
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
|
SLI support |
|
| + | n/a |
|
GPU Boost |
|
| + | n/a |
|
GeForce Experience |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
| n/a | + |
|
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
|
Ansel |
|
|
Bus |
|
PCI Express 3. 0 |
n/a |
|
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
| 1024 | n/a |
|
GameStream |
|
| + | n/a |
|
GeForce ShadowPlay |
|
|
GameWorks |
|
|
HDMI |
|
|
OpenCL |
|
| 1.1 | n/a |
|
BatteryBoost |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VGA analog monitor support |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Support for DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Video decoder H. |
|
| + | n/a |
|
DSR |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Video connectors |
|
| No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
|
DirectX |
|
| 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
|
Floating point performance |
|
| 2.355 gflops | 3.935 gflops |
|
Optimus |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
| n/a | 19 Mh/s |
264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p | Benchmarks |
| Memory |
Memorial type | 9000 9000 |
| GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
|
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, | |
