Radeon HD 8280 IGP vs Radeon HD 6570
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8280 IGP |
| 45 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6570 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6570 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6570
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 6570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | Kalindi () | vs | Turks (Turks PRO) | |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm | |
| Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 118 mm² | |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 716 million | |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 480 | |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 6 | |
| Core clock | 450 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 | |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 6570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit | |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 6570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 60 watts | |
| Release Date | 18 Sep 2013 | vs | 19 Apr 2011 |
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
1.
80 GP/s
-
Radeon HD 6570
5.20 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
3.60 GT/s
-
Radeon HD 6570
15.60 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
0.00 GB/s
-
Radeon HD 6570
64.00 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
115.20 GFLOPs
-
Radeon HD 6570
624.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon HD 4730 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon HD 4770 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GT 730 GDDR5 | GeForce GT 720 384SP |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GT 720 384SP | Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7850K) |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Radeon HD 8280 IGP vs Radeon HD 6570 OEM
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8280 IGP |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6570 OEM |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6570 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 6570 OEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | Kalindi () | vs | Turks (Turks PRO-L) | |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm | |
| Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 118 mm² | |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 716 million | |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 480 | |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 6 | |
| Core clock | 450 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 | |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 6570 OEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 | |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit | |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 6570 OEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 44 watts | |
| Release Date | 18 Sep 2013 | vs | 7 Feb 2011 |
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
1.
80 GP/s -
Radeon HD 6570 OEM
5.20 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
3.60 GT/s
-
Radeon HD 6570 OEM
15.60 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
0.00 GB/s
-
Radeon HD 6570 OEM
28.80 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
115.20 GFLOPs
-
Radeon HD 6570 OEM
624.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 6570 OEM | Radeon HD 6570 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 6570 OEM | Radeon HD 4730 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GT 730 GDDR5 | GeForce GT 720 384SP |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GT 720 384SP | Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7850K) |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD Radeon HD 8280 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570 comparison, which is better?
Home / Video card / AMD Radeon HD 8280 VS AMD Radeon HD 6570
AMD Radeon HD 8280
17%
Devicelist
VS
AMD RADEON HD 6570
51% 9000,000,0002% 9000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 5000 51% 9000% specifications of AMD Radeon HD 8280 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023. nine0003
Advantages AMD Radeon HD 8280
|
Process |
|
28 nm -12 nm (-30%) better than vs 40 nm |
Benefits AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparison winner
|
Number of shader processors |
|
480 352 (275%) better than vs 128 |
| General information | |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. |
|
| n/a | 50.7% |
|
Architecture |
|
| GCN | TeraScale 2 |
|
Codename |
|
| Temash | Turks |
|
Type |
|
| Notebook | Desktop |
|
Release price |
|
| n/a | 79 $ |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 128 | 480
352 (275%) better than |
|
Core clock |
|
| 450MHz | no data |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| n/a | 650 MHz |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| n/a | 716 million |
|
Process |
|
| 28 nm
-12 nm (-30%) better than |
40 nm |
|
Interface |
|
| n/a | PCIe 2. 0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| n/a | 40 W |
|
Length |
|
| n/a | 168 mm |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| n/a | no |
|
Tire |
|
| n/a | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
|
Design |
|
| n/a | reference |
|
Eyefinity |
|
| n/a | + |
|
HDMI |
|
|
DisplayPort support |
|
|
UVD |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Video connectors |
|
| n/a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
|
DirectX |
|
DirectX 11. 1, Shader 5.0 |
DirectX® 11 |
|
Floating point performance |
|
| n/a | |
|
CrossFire |
|
| n/a | + |
The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. | benchmark |
| memory | |
|
memory type |
|
| No data | GDDR5 |
|
Maximum memory A large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a large number of textures, |
|
| n/a | 1 GB |
|
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. nine0003 |
|
| n/a | 128 bit |
|
Shared memory |
|
| + | no data |
|
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
| n/a | 900 MHz |
|
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM the PC can use. |
|
| n/a | 28.8 |
Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7340 vs AMD Radeon HD 8280 which is better?
0003
DeviceList Score
vs
AMD Radeon HD 8280
17%
DeviceList Score
We compared AMD Radeon HD 7340 and AMD Radeon HD 8280 specifications and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023.
Benefits of AMD Radeon HD 7340
Benefits of AMD Radeon HD 8280
Comparison winner
|
Number of shader processors |
|
128 48 (60%) better than vs 80 |
|
Core frequency |
|
450 MHz At 450 MHz (-100%) better than vs 0 MHz |
|
Process |
|
28 nm -12 nm (-30%) better than vs 40 nm |
| General information | |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. |
|
| 6.9% | |
|
Architecture |
|
| Terascale 2 | GCN |
|
Codename |
|
| Zacate | Temash |
|
Type |
|
| Notebook | For laptops |
|
Release price |
|
| 552.69 $ | no data |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 80 | 128
48 (60%) better than |
|
Core clock |
|
| 0MHz | 450 MHz
At 450 MHz (-100%) better than nine0027 |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| 680 MHz | no data |
|
Process |
|
| 40 nm | 28 nm
-12 nm (-30%) better than |
|
DirectX |
|
DirectX 11, Shader 5.
| |
The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.