I3 7100 vs ryzen 3 2200u: Please click the green button to continue.

Intel Core i3 7100 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U: performance comparison

Intel Core i3 7100

AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

We compared two 2-core CPUs: the 3.9 GHz Intel Core i3 7100 (desktop) against the 2.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 3 2200U (laptop). On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i3 7100

Ryzen 3 2200U

Multi-Core Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i3 7100

Ryzen 3 2200U

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i3 7100

Ryzen 3 2200U

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i3 7100

Ryzen 3 2200U

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 2200U and 7100

Advantages of Intel Core i3 7100

Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-400 RAM
32% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 980 vs 744 points

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

Has 1024 KB larger L3 cache size
Newer — released 1-year and 1-month later

Promotion

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i3 7100

n/a

Ryzen 3 2200U

502

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i3 7100

n/a

Ryzen 3 2200U

1428

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i3 7100
+38%

2315

Ryzen 3 2200U

1681

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i3 7100
+18%

4338

Ryzen 3 2200U

3662

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i3 7100
+32%

979

Ryzen 3 2200U

740

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i3 7100
+29%

2139

Ryzen 3 2200U

1662

Submit your Cinebench R23 result

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i3 7100 and AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

General

Vendor	Intel	AMD
Released	January 3, 2017	January 8, 2018
Type	Desktop	Laptop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Kaby Lake	Zen (Raven Ridge)
Model number	i3-7100	—
Integrated GPU	HD Graphics 630	Radeon Vega 3

Performance Cores
P-Cores	2	2
P-Threads	4	4
Base Frequency (P)	3. 9 GHz	2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P)	—	3.4 GHz

Total
Total Cores	2	2
Total Threads	4	4
Bus Frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	39x	25x
Bus Bandwidth	8 GT/s	—
L1 Cache	64K (per core)	128K (per core)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 Cache	3MB (shared)	4MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	No	No

Package

Transistors	—	4. 9 billions
Fabrication process	14 nm	14 nm
TDP (PL1)	51 W	15 W
Socket	LGA-1151	FP5
Peak temperature	100°C	95°C

Integrated Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 630	Radeon Vega 3
GPU Base Clock	350 MHz	300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock	1100 MHz	1100 MHz
Shading Units	192	192
TMUs	24	12
ROPs	3	8
Execution Units	24	3
TGP	15 W	15 W
Max. Resolution	4096×2304 — 60 Hz	3840×2160 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i3 7100

0.44 TFLOPS

Ryzen 3 2200U

0.54 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory types	— DDR4-400 — DDR3L-1600	— DDR4-2400
Memory Size	64 GB	32 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	35.76 GB/s	35.76 GB/s
ECC Support	Yes	Yes

Official site	Intel Core i3 7100 official page	AMD Ryzen 3 2200U official page
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	16	12
Extended instructions	SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2	—

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i3 7100

0 (0%)

Ryzen 3 2200U

0 (0%)

Total votes: < 1

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 2200U or Intel Core i3 7100?

Name

Message

Promotion

Intel Core i3-7100 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Core i3-7100 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-7100 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz.

The second is used on the thin and light laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	Intel Core i3-7100	AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Market (main)	Desktop	Thin and light laptop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Kaby Lake	Zen
Core name	Kaby Lake-S	Raven Ridge
Family	Core i3-7000	Ryzen 3 2000
Part number(s), S-Spec	BX80677I37100, BXC80677I37100, SR35C	YM2200C4T2OFB
Release date	Q1 2017	Q1 2018
Lithography	14 nm+	14 nm
Transistors	—	4. 940.000.000
Cores	2	2
Threads	4	4
Base frequency	3,9 GHz	2,5 GHz
Turbo frequency	—	3,4 GHz
Cache memory	3 MB	4 MB
Max memory capacity	64 GB	32 GB
Memory types	DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600	DDR4-2400
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	38,4 GB/s	35,76 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	16	12
TDP	51 W	15 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	—
GPU integrated graphics	Intel HD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Raven)
GPU cores	—	3
GPU execution units	24	—
GPU shading units	192	192
GPU base clock	350 MHz	300 MHz
GPU boost clock	1100 MHz	1000 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	384 GFLOPS	684 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA1151	FP5
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard	—
Maximum temperature	100°C	95°C
CPU-Z single thread	413	329
CPU-Z multi thread	1. 166	1.007
Cinebench R15 single thread	162	120
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	422	310
PassMark single thread	2.319	1.684
PassMark CPU Mark	4.315	3.681
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core	4.424	3.051
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core	8.424	5.968
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	125,5 GFLOPS	69,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	165 pts / W	398 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i3-7100 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U is less. The AMD Ryzen 3 2200U was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i3-7100	413 1.166
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	329 1.007

In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i3-7100	162 422
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	120 310

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i3-7100	2.319 4.315
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	1.684 3.681

In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 17%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i3-7100	4.424 8.424
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	3.051 5.968

In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 41%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i3-7100	5. 006 9.306
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	3.314 6.475

In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	3.017 6.345
Intel Core i3-7100	3.779 6.165

In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.