Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-6500
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-6500
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80662I56500
BX80684I38100
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 357,324 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
240,814 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 58% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 58%
Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 368th / 1368
Gaming 70% Battle cruiser |
Desktop 74% Battleship |
Workstation 53% Yacht |
116,510 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Base clock 3. 6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61%
Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 223rd / 1368
Gaming 77% Battleship |
Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier |
Workstation 59% Gunboat |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
69.8 % | 77.1 % | Faster effective speed. +11% |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
79.7 Pts | 85.2 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +7% |
|||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
97.8 Pts | 108 Pts | Faster single-core speed. +10% |
|||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
193 Pts | 216 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. +12% |
|||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
346 Pts | 399 Pts | Faster quad-core speed. +15% |
|||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
354 Pts | 406 Pts | Faster octa-core speed. +15% |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
89. 9 Pts | 93.3 Pts | +4% | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
109 Pts | 113 Pts | +4% | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
211 Pts | 227 Pts | Slightly faster OC dual-core speed. +8% |
|||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
410 Pts | 452 Pts | Faster OC quad-core speed. +10% |
|||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
409 Pts | 452 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed. +11% |
Market Share
Based on 56,203,905 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0. 63 % | Hugely higher market share. +110% |
0.3 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
86 % | 88.3 % | +3% | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
65 % | 67 % | +3% | |||
Price Price (score) |
$130 | Cheaper. +24% |
$170 |
Age Newest |
85 Months | 60 Months | More recent. +29% |
|||
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
65 Watts | 65 Watts | ||||
Cores CPU Processing Cores |
4 cores | 4 cores | ||||
Threads CPU Processing Threads |
4 threads | 4 threads | ||||
Lithography Manufacturing process |
14 nm | 14 nm | ||||
Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3. 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | Faster base frequency. +12% |
|||
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | ||||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
408 Pts | 451 Pts | Faster OC 64-core speed. +11% |
|||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
356 Pts | 408 Pts | Faster 64-core speed. +15% |
Series CPU Architecture |
Skylake | Coffee Lake | ||||
Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 | ||||
Graphics Integrated Graphics |
HD 530 | UHD 630 | ||||
Launch Date Launch Date |
Q3’15 | Q4’17 | ||||
Cache Cache |
6 MB SmartCache | 6 MB | ||||
Instruction Set Extensions Instruction Set Extensions |
SSE4. 1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2 | ||||
Embedded Options Available Embedded Options Available |
Yes | No | ||||
Recommended Price Recommended Customer Price |
$192.00 — $202.00 | N/A | ||||
Memory Types Memory Types |
DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-2400 | ||||
Processor Graphics Processor Graphics ‡ |
Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | ||||
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency |
1.05 GHz | 1. 10 GHz | ||||
Turbo Boost Tech Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡ |
2.0 | No | ||||
TSX-NI Intel® TSX-NI |
Yes | No | ||||
vPro Tech Intel® vPro™ Technology ‡ |
Yes | No | ||||
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) |
Yes | No | ||||
Trusted Execution Tech Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡ |
Yes | No | ||||
PCI Express Configurations PCI Express Configurations ‡ |
Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4 | ||||
More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Intel Core i5-6500 vs Intel Core i3-8100T
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-6500 vs Intel Core i3-8100T
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-6500 on one side and the Intel Core i3-8100T on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the mini desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | Intel Core i5-6500 | Intel Core i3-8100T | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Mini desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Skylake | Coffee Lake | ||||||
Core name | Skylake-S | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Core i5-6000 | Core i3-8000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | CM8066201920404, BX80662I56500, BXC80662I56500, SR2L6 |
CM8068403377415, QP5Q, SR3Y8 |
||||||
Release date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2018 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 3,1 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,6 GHz | — | ||||||
Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
Cache memory | 6 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-2400 | ||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 37,5 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 35 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
GPU execution units | 24 | 23 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 192 | 184 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 403,2 GFLOPS | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 71°C | 82°C | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 382 | 421 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 1. 524 | 1.645 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 137 | 121 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 540 | 514 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.114 | 1.921 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 5.631 | 5.322 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.089 | 3.679 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
11.376 | 10.515 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
220,1 GFLOPS | 266,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
175 pts / W | 300 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-6500 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i3-8100T is less. The Intel Core i3-8100T was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-8100T |
421 1.645 |
Intel Core i5-6500 |
382 1.524 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-6500 |
137 540 |
Intel Core i3-8100T |
121 514 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-6500 |
2.114 5.631 |
Intel Core i3-8100T |
1.921 5.322 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-6500 |
4.089 11.376 |
Intel Core i3-8100T |
3.679 10.515 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-6500 |
4.803 13.500 |
Intel Core i3-8100T |
3.186 6.568 |
In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 106%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-6500 |
4.510 12.878 |
Intel Core i3-8100T |
4.144 12.390 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.