I3 8100 vs i5 8500: Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-8500

9 января, 2021

Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8500: What is the difference?

53points

Intel Core i3-8100

57points

Intel Core i5-8500

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i5-8500

Why is Intel Core i3-8100 better than Intel Core i5-8500?

  • Supports ECC memory?
  • 6 higher clock multiplier?
    36vs30

Why is Intel Core i5-8500 better than Intel Core i3-8100?

  • 25% faster CPU speed?
    6 x 3GHzvs4 x 3.6GHz
  • 266MHz higher ram speed?
    2666MHzvs2400MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads?
    6vs4
  • 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
    1.5MBvs1MB
  • 15.8% higher PassMark result?
    9476vs8183
  • 3MB bigger L3 cache?
    9MBvs6MB
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    384KBvs256KB
  • 3. 2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    41.6GB/svs38.4GB/s

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core M3-8100Y

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i5-9500

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i3-8100T

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i5-8500T

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Pentium Gold G5400

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Celeron 6305

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i7-8700

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i3-9100

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i5-8500

vs

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. CPU speed

4 x 3.6GHz

6 x 3GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

4.1GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5-8500

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2400MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

38.4GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5-8500

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8500)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8500)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

420.7seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

1122.2seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8500)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5-8500

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8500)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i5 8500 vs i3 8100: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i5 8500

Intel Core i3 8100

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3. 0 GHz Intel Core i5 8500 with 6-cores against the 3.6 GHz i3 8100 with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i5 8500

56

Core i3 8100

51

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i5 8500

28

Core i3 8100

18

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i5 8500

46

Core i3 8100

44

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i5 8500

43

Core i3 8100

37

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 8100 and 8500

Advantages of Intel Core i5 8500

  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • Has 3 MB larger L3 cache size
  • Newer — released 6-months later
  • Around 4. 1 GB/s (11%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8500
+13%

1047

Core i3 8100

927

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8500
+54%

5487

Core i3 8100

3571

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i5 8500
+11%

2460

Core i3 8100

2222

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8500
+56%

9544

Core i3 8100

6129

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8500
+8%

1026

Core i3 8100

946

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8500
+46%

4834

Core i3 8100

3314

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8500 and i3 8100

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released April 3, 2018 October 5, 2017
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Model number i5-8500 i3-8100
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Base Frequency 3. 0 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4.1 GHz —
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 30x 28x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 9MB (shared) 6MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No
Fabrication process 14 nm 14 nm
TDP 65 W 65 W
Max. temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1100 MHz 1100 MHz
Shading Units 192 192
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 3 3
Execution Units 24 24
TGP 15 W 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz 4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i5 8500

0.38 TFLOPS

Core i3 8100

0.38 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2400
Memory Size 128 GB 64 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 37.5 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes
Official site Intel Core i5 8500 official page Intel Core i3 8100 official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i5 8500

3 (100%)

Core i3 8100

0 (0%)

Total votes: 3

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i3 8100 or i5 8500?

Name

Message

Promotion

Intel Core i5-8500 vs Intel Core i3-8100

Summary

  • Intel Core i5-8500

    140%

  • Intel Core i3-8100

    100%

Relative performance

  • Intel Core i5-8500

    112%

  • Intel Core i3-8100

    100%

Relative performance

  • Intel Core i5-8500

    168%

  • Intel Core i3-8100

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-8500
12% higher single threaded performance.
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 68% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
Around 40% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-8100
None

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-8500

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-8500

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features
Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0

Architecture
Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100
Architecture Intel_Coffelake vs Intel_Coffelake
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR4
Codename Coffee Lake vs Coffee Lake
Release Date Feb 2018 vs Jan 2018

Cores
Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100
Cores 6 vs 4
Threads 6 vs 4
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel UHD 630

Cache
Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100
L1 Cache 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 9216 KB (shared) vs 6144 KB (shared)

Physical
Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100
Socket Intel Socket 1151 vs Intel Socket 1151
Max Case Temp 72°C vs 72°C
Package FC-LGA1151 vs FC-LGA1151
Die Size unknown vs 151mm²
Process 14 nm vs 14 nm

Performance
Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100
Cpu Frequency 3000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
Turbo Clock 4100 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage variable vs unknown
TDP 65 W vs 65 W

  • Intel Core i5-8500

    4920 points

  • Intel Core i3-8100

    4320 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Core i5-8500

    21600 points

  • Intel Core i3-8100

    13440 points

Points — higher is better

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8500

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-8100 on one side and the Intel Core i5-8500 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i5-8500
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Coffee Lake

Coffee Lake
Core name

Coffee Lake-S

Coffee Lake-S
Family

Core i3-8000

Core i5-8000
Part number(s), S-Spec

BX80684I38100,
BXC80684I38100,
CM8068403377308,
SR3N5

BX80684I58500,
BXC80684I58500,
CM8068403362607,
BOC80684I58500,
BO80684I58500,
SR3XE
Release date

Q4 2017

Q2 2018
Lithography

14 nm++

14 nm++
Cores

4

6
Threads

4

6
Base frequency

3,6 GHz

3,0 GHz
Turbo frequency

—

4,1 GHz
Bus speed

8 GT/s

8 GT/s
Cache memory

6 MB

9 MB
Max memory capacity

64 GB

64 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2400

DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

37,5 GB/s

41,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

16

16
TDP

65 W

65 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)
GPU execution units

23

23
GPU shading units

184

184
GPU base clock

350 MHz

350 MHz
GPU boost clock

1100 MHz

1100 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

423,2 GFLOPS

423,2 GFLOPS
Socket

LGA1151

LGA1151
Compatible motherboard

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

100°C

100°C
CPU-Z single thread

422

463
CPU-Z multi thread

1. 654

2.725
Cinebench R15 single thread

154

174
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

616

981
Cinebench R20 single thread

363

402
Cinebench R20 multi-thread

1.408

2.229
Cinebench R23 single thread

707

943
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

2.745

5.526
PassMark single thread

2.231

2.483
PassMark CPU Mark

6. 120

9.596
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

4.327

4.793
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

12.377

18.008
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core

962

1.156
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

3.031

5.365
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

225,6 GFLOPS

252 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

190 pts / W

277 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i5-8500 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-8500 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i5-8500 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-8500

463

2.725
Intel Core i3-8100

422

1.654

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 65%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-8500

174

981
Intel Core i3-8100

154

616

In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 59%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-8500

402

2.229
Intel Core i3-8100

363

1.408

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 58%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-8500

943

5.526
Intel Core i3-8100

707

2.745

In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 101%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-8500

2.483

9.596
Intel Core i3-8100

2.231

6. 120

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-8500

4.793

18.008
Intel Core i3-8100

4.327

12.377

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-8500

5.426

20.230
Intel Core i3-8100

4.665

12.104

In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 67%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i5-8500

4.413

17.004
Intel Core i3-8100

3.131

7.065

In single core, the difference is 41%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 141%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i5-8500

5.164

20.147
Intel Core i3-8100

4.480

13.074

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i5-8500

1.156

5.365
Intel Core i3-8100

962

3.031

In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 77%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i5-8500

1.157

5.473
Intel Core i3-8100

1.027

3.272

In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 67%.

On macOS:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Intel Core i5-8500

1.047

5.236
Intel Core i3-8100

932

3.221

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 63%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i3-8100 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-8500 AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i3-8100BIntel Core i3-8100TIntel Core i3-8109U

Intel Core i5-8500BIntel Core i5-8500T

Intel Core i5-8500 vs. Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i5-8500

The Intel Core i5-8500 operates with 6 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at 4.10 GHz base 3.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2018

Intel Core i3-8100

The Intel Core i3-8100 operates with 4 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W. The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2017

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i3-8100

Compare Detail

3.00 GHz Frequency 3.60 GHz
6 Cores 4
4.10 GHz Turbo (1 Core) No turbo
3.70 GHz Turbo (All Cores) No turbo
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel UHD Graphics 630

 GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 630
1. 15 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.10 GHz
14 nm Technology 14 nm
1.15 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.10 GHz
12 DirectX Version 12
3 Max. displays 3
DDR4-2666 Memory DDR4-2400
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
No ECC Yes
— L2 Cache —
9.00 MB L3 Cache 6.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
16 PCIe lanes 16
14 nm Technology 14 nm
LGA 1151-2 Socket LGA 1151-2
65 W TDP 65 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q1/2018 Release date Q4/2017

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100
65 W Max TDP 65 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Core i3-8100T vs Intel Core i5-8500


Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-8100T and Intel Core i5-8500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i3-8100T

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Core i5-8500

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-8100T

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt



Launch date April 2018 vs February 2018
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-8500

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
  • 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
  • Around 32% higher clock speed: 4. 10 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
  • Around 22% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 82°C
  • Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2480 vs 1918
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 9585 vs 5255
  • Around 29% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1074 vs 833
  • Around 75% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 4700 vs 2689
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1943 vs 1366
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1943 vs 1366















Number of cores 6 vs 4
Number of threads 6 vs 4
Maximum frequency 4. 10 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 82°C
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 9216 KB (shared) vs 6144 KB (shared)
Maximum memory size 128 GB vs 64 GB
PassMark — Single thread mark 2480 vs 1918
PassMark — CPU mark 9585 vs 5255
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1074 vs 833
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 4700 vs 2689
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1943 vs 1366
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1943 vs 1366

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Core i3-8100T
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-8500







PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1
CPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1
CPU 2



















Name Intel Core i3-8100T Intel Core i5-8500
PassMark — Single thread mark 1918 2480
PassMark — CPU mark 5255 9585
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 833 1074
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2689 4700
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1366 1943
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1366 1943
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score

5101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

5.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

77.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

0.766
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

3.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

10.65
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)

1058
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

1800
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

1058
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

1800

Compare specifications (specs)













































































Intel Core i3-8100T Intel Core i5-8500
Architecture codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Launch date April 2018 February 2018
Place in performance rating 1240 1184
Price now $195. 99 $229
Processor Number i3-8100T i5-8500
Series 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors
Status Launched Launched
Value for money (0-100) 11.16 15.36
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency 3. 10 GHz 3.00 GHz
Bus Speed 8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s DMI3
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared) 9216 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 72 °C
Maximum core temperature 82°C 100°C
Maximum frequency 3. 1 GHz 4.10 GHz
Number of cores 4 6
Number of threads 4 6
Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 37.5 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
Maximum memory size 64 GB 128 GB
Supported memory types DDR4-2400 DDR4-2666
Device ID 0x3E91 0x3E92
Graphics base frequency 350 MHz 350 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 10 GHz 1.10 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Max video memory 64 GB 64 GB
Processor graphics Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® UHD Graphics 630
Number of displays supported 3 3
4K resolution support
Max resolution over DisplayPort [email protected] [email protected]
Max resolution over eDP [email protected] [email protected]
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 [email protected] [email protected]
DirectX 12 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Configurable TDP-down 25 W
Configurable TDP-down Frequency 2.40 GHz
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported FCLGA1151 FCLGA1151
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt
Thermal Solution PCG 2015A (35W) PCG 2015C (65W)
Max number of PCIe lanes 16 16
PCI Express revision 3.0 3.0
PCIe configurations Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability 1S Only 1S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Secure Boot
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8500: What is the difference?

53 BALLLA

Intel Core i3-8100

57 Ballla

Intel Core i5-8500 9000 Why is Intel Core i3-8100 better than Intel Core i5-8500?

  • Supports memory troubleshooting code?
  • 6 higher hour multiplier?
    36 vs 30

Why is Intel Core i5-8500 better than Intel Core i3-8100?

  • 25% higher CPU speed?
    6 x 3GHz vs 4 x 3. 6GHz
  • 266MHz higher RAM speed?
    2666MHz vs 2400MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads?
    6 vs 4
  • 0.5MB more L2 cache?
    1.5MB vs 1MB
  • 15.8% higher PassMark result?
    9476 vs 8183
  • 3MB more L3 cache?
    9MB vs 6MB
  • 128KB more L1 cache?
    384KB vs 256KB
  • 3.2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    41.6GB/s vs 38.4GB/s

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5-8500

VS

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i3-8100

VS

Intel Core M3100Y

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel I5-9500

9000 9000 9000 8100

VS

Intel Core i3-8100t

Intel Core i5-8500

VS

Intel Core i5-8500T

Intel Core I3-8100 VS

ITEL PENTIUM GOLD GOLD GOLD GOLD GREEM 8500

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i3-8100

VS

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5-8500

INTEL CORE vs

Intel Celeron 6305

Intel Core i5-8500

VS

Intel Core i7-8700

Intel Core i3-8100

9000 vs

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i3-8100

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i3-9100

-8100

VS

000 Core Core 6700

Intel Core i5-8500

VS

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i3-8100

VS

Intel Core I3-10100

Costs

Users

Productive Productive Productive Productive Production0002 1.

CPU speed

4 x 3.6GHz

6 x 3GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3. turbo clock speed

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

4.1GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5-8500

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1.5MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2400MHz

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

38.4GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports Memory Error Code

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5-8500

Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8. eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8500)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8500)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

420.7seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

1122.2seconds

The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8500)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5-8500

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5-8500

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8500)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Intel Core i5 8500 vs i3 8100:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i5 8500

Intel Core i3 8100

Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i5 8500 at 3.0 GHz or i3 8100 with 4 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one kernel

Core i5 8500

56

Core i3 8100

51

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei

Core 8500 9000 28

Core i3 8100

18

Energy efficiency

Efficiency of energy consumption chip

Core i5 8500

46

Core i3 8100

44

Rating NanoreView

Final rating of the processor

Core i5 8500

43 9000 9000 37 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

Key differences

What are the main differences between 8100 and 8500

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 8500

  • Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2666
  • Has 2 physical cores more
  • Has 3 MB more L3 cache
  • Introduced 6 months later than the competitor
  • 4. 1 GB/s (11%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i5 8500
+13%

1047

Core i3 8100

927

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i5 8500
+54%

5487

Core i3 8100

3571

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i5 8500
+11%

2460

Core i3 8100

2222

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i5 8500
+56%

9544

Core i3 8100

6129

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i5 8500
+8%

1026

Core i3 8100

946

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i5 8500
+46%

4834

Core i3 8100

3314

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full technical specifications of the Intel Core i5 8500 and i3 8100

General information

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Release date April 3, 2018 October 5, 2017
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Model number i5-8500 i3-8100
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores 6 4
Number of threads 6 4
Frequency 3. 0 GHz 3.6GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.1 GHz —
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 30x 28x
Tire speed 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 256KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 9MB (shared) 6MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier No No

Power consumption

Process 14 nanometers 14 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 65 W
Critical temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU clock 350 MHz 350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency 1100 MHz 1100 MHz
Shader blocks 192 192
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 3 3
Computer units 24 24
TGP 15W 15W
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz 4096×2304 — 60Hz

Igpu Flops

Core i5 8500

0.38 Teraflops

Core i3 8100

0.38 Teraflops

Support Support

9031 9033

DDR4-2666 DDR4-2400
Max. size 128 GB 64 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 37.5 GB/s
ECC support No Yes

Other

Official site Site Intel Core i5 8500 Site Intel Core i3 8100
PCI Express version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i5 8500

3 (100%)

Core i3 8100

0 (0%)

Total votes: 3

What will you choose: Intel Core i3 8100 or i5 8500?

Name

Message

Core i5-8500 vs.

Core i3-8100T

Core i5-8500 vs. Core i3-8100T — Th200

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Features
  3. Tests
  4. Key differences
  5. Conclusion
  6. Comments

Processor

Processor

Introduction

We compared two processors: Intel Core i5-8500 vs. Intel Core i3-8100T. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

Intel Core i5-8500 is a Core i5 (Coffee Lake) generation desktop processor released Feb 14th, 2018. It has 6 cores and 6 threads. Operates at a frequency of 3000 MHz and consumes up to 65 watts.

Intel Core i3-8100T is a Core i3 (Coffee Lake) generation desktop processor released on Apr 2nd, 2018. It has 4 cores and 4 threads. Operates at a frequency of 3100 MHz and consumes up to 35 watts.

Characteristics

Generation

Core i5 (Coffee Lake)

Core i3 (Coffee Lake)

Release date

FEB 14TH, 2018

APR 2ND, 2018

9000

Frequency

3000 MHz

3100 MHz

Turbbo frequency

4100 MHz

Nuclei

6

4 9000 )

cache L2

256K (Per Core)

256K (Per Core)

Building graphics

N/A

N/A

Support

DDR4-2666 MHZ DUAL-MHANNEL

DDR4- DDR4- 2666 MHz Dual-channel

ECC memory

No

No

PCI-Express

GEN 3, 16 Lanes (CPU Only)

Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU ONLY)

Instructions

AES-Ni, AVX, AVX2, AVX2, AVX2, AVX2, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, Boost 2.0, CLMUL, EIST, F16C, FMA3, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT-d, VT-x, XD bit

AES- NI, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, Boost 2. 0, CLMUL, EIST, F16C, FMA3, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT-d, VT-x, XD bit

Benchmarks

3DMark Physics

3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i3-8100T

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

Intel Core i5-8500
+130%

Intel Core i3-8100T

Geekbench 5 Multi-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a multi-threaded version, i.e. all cores are used, making it suitable for evaluating server performance.

Intel Core i5-8500
+73%

Intel Core i3-8100T

Geekbench 5 Single-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a single threaded version. Most applications (MS Word, web browsers, games) rarely use more than one thread at a time, making it suitable for performance evaluation in everyday tasks.

Intel Core i5-8500
+30%

Intel Core i3-8100T

Key differences

Why is Intel Core i5-8500 better than Intel Core i3-8100T?

Has 2 more cores — 6 vs 4

Has 2 more threads — 6 vs 4

Why is Intel Core i3-8100T better than Intel Core i5-8500?

Newer — 1 month later release

Consumes 47% less power — 35W vs. 65W

Has a 4% higher frequency — 3100MHz vs. 3000MHz

Conclusion

The Core i5-8500 delivers 39% better performance, uses up to 86% more energy and has 100 MHz lower frequency. According to our research, the Core i5-8500 3990X is more powerful than the Core i3-8100T. Even though the Core i5-8500 is the winner in this comparison, it’s worth paying attention to the Core i5-8500 vs. Core i5-8600K comparison. The Core i5-8600K is the same generation processor but more powerful.

Relative performance

Relative single thread performance

Relative multi-thread performance

Overall performance

Overall single-thread performance

Overall multi-thread performance

Desktop performance

Desktop single-thread performance

Desktop multi-thread performance

Desktop multi-thread performance

Intel Core i5-8500 vs. Intel Core i3-8100B

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i5-8500 runs with 6 and 6 CPU threads It runs at 4. 10 GHz base 3.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W . CPU socket LGA 1151-2 This version includes 9.00 MB L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture has been advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2018

Intel Core i3-8100B

Intel Core i3-8100B works with 4 and 6 CPU threads It runs on No turbo base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to BGA 1440 CPU socket This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2018

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i3-8100B

Frequency 3. 60 GHz 6 Cores 4 4.10GHz Turbo (1 core) No turbo 3.70GHz Turbo (all cores) No turbo No. Hyper Threading No. No. Overclocking No. normal Basic architecture normal

Intel UHD Graphics 630

GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 630

1.15GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz 14nm Technology 14nm 1.15GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz 12 DirectX Version 12 3 Max. displays 3 DDR4-2666 memory size DDR4-2666 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory No. ECC No. — L2 Cache — 9.00MB L3 Cache 6.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 3.0 16 PCIe lanes 16 14nm Technology 14nm LGA 1151-2 Connector BGA 1440 65W TDP 65W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q1/2018 Release date Q3/2018

Show more details

Show more details

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Intel Core i5-8500 Intel Core i3-8100B
65W Max TDP 65W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Operating cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Cost per year NA

Popular comparison

Comments

Overall rating

Issue date
Q3/2018

Issue date
Q1/2018

Overall rating

Detailed comparison of Intel Core i3-8100B 14 nm and Intel Core i3-8100B 14 nm by benchmarks and technical specifications.

The main differences between the models
Performance Tests
Characteristics
Reviews

Main differences between models

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i3-8100B

Report a bug

  • Higher clock frequency

    3.60 GHz 3.00 GHz

    Approximately -20%
    higher clock frequency

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i5-8500

Report a bug

Performance tests

Accurate performance tests Intel Core i3-8100B vs Intel Core i5-8500

Cinebench R23 (Single Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite

Intel Core i3-8100B

896

Intel Core i5-8500

1052

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Intel Core i3-8100B

3698

Intel Core i5-8500

5612

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single Core)

Intel Core i3-8100B

966

Intel Core i5-8500

1086

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Intel Core i3-8100B

3329

Intel Core i5-8500

4761

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Intel Core i3-8100B

403

Intel Core i5-8500

442

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Intel Core i3-8100B

8493

Intel Core i5-8500

11501

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single Core)

Intel Core i3-8100B

3705

Intel Core i5-8500

4337

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Intel Core i3-8100B

11468

Intel Core i5-8500

18529

Features

Exact specifications for model comparison

Intel Core i3-8100B

Intel Core i5-8500

Processor generation and family

description_compare ✍(◔◡◔) Description on comparison page Intel Core i3-8100B and Intel Core i5-8500

  • Name

    Intel Core i3-8100B Intel Core i5-8500

  • Segment

    Desktop / Server Desktop / Server

  • Family

    Intel Core i3 Intel Core i5

  • Generation

    8 8

  • CPU group

    Intel Core i 8000 Intel Core i 8000

  • Previous

    — Intel Core i5-7500

  • Successor

    — Intel Core i5-9500

Processor cores and frequency

Processor cores and frequency

  • Frequency

    3. 60 GHz 3.00 GHz

  • CPU cores

    4 6

  • Turbo (1 core)

    No turbo 4.10 GHz

  • CPU Threads

    4 6

  • Hyperthreading

    No. No.

  • Overclocking

    No. No.

  • Basic architecture

    normal normal

Integrated video card

Codec support

  • h365 / HEVC (8 bit)

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • h365 / HEVC (10bit)

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • h364

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • VP9

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • VP8

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • AV1

    No. No.

  • AVC

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • VC-1

    Decode Decode

  • JPEG

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

  • Memory type

    DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666

  • Maximum memory

    64GB 128GB

  • ECC

    No. No.

  • Memory channels

    2 2

  • PCIe version

    3.0 3.0

  • PCIe lanes

    16 16

Encryption

  • AES-NI

    Yes Yes

Temperature rating

  • TDP (PL1)

    65W 65W

  • Tjunction max.

    100 °C —

Specifications

  • Instruction Set (ISA)

    x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)

  • Virtualization

    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

  • ISA Extensions

    SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2

  • L3 cache

    6.00MB 9.00MB

  • Architecture

    Coffee Lake S Coffee Lake S

  • Technology

    14 nm 14 nm

  • Socket

    BGA 1440 LGA 1151-2

  • Issue date

    Q3/2018 Q1/2018

Used in

Latest comparisons

Intel Atom C3538

Intel Atom C3558

AMD A4-3330MX

Intel Pentium Gold G5500T

EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti K|NGP|N GAMING

MANLI GeForce GTX 1660Ti (M1431+N524-02)

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1060 AMP! Edition+ 6GB

MSI GeForce GTX 1060 GAMING X 6G

Intel Xeon W-1250E

Intel Xeon W-1250P

EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 GAMING 6GB

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 12GB

GIGABYTE RX 5500XT D6 8G

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X WHITE 8G (rev. 2.0)

MSI GeForce GTX 1660 GAMING 6G

Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 GhostOC

GIGABYTE Radeon RX Vega 64 Silver 8G

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 Gaming 8G

Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2060 Windforce OC 12G

INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER iCHILL X3

GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 Ti SG (1-Click OC)

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060

Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual V1

Intel Xeon Gold 6126F

Intel Xeon Gold 6138F

AMD A10-6700

AMD Ryzen 3 2300X

Report a bugDescription of the bug

Link to source

Test of Intel Core i5-8600, Core i5-8500 and Core i3-8300 processors in games (page 2)

Need for Speed ​​Payback



  • Version 1.0.0.220.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Full screen anti-aliasing (MSAA) — 4X.
    • High resolution textures — enabled.
    • The quality of visual effects is high.
    • Blur — enabled.
    • Dynamic lighting — enabled.
    • Shadows — included.
    • Shadow resolution — 8192 x 8192.
    • Overlay resolution — 4096 x 4096.
    • Full screen overlay — enabled.
    • Landscape quality is high.
    • High resolution terrain geometry — enabled.
    • High resolution terrain textures — included.
    • High quality terrain shaders — included.
    • Volumetric lighting — included.
    • Volumetric Lighting Render Resolution — 2048 x 2048.
    • High noise detail — enabled.
    • High resolution water — included.
    • High quality water shaders included.
    • Water reflections — 4 steps.
    • Animation of leaders — high.


1920×1080

Nominal

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Acceleration

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

Surviving Mars



  • Version 1 Update 1.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Shadow quality is high.
    • Texture quality — ultra high.
    • Anisotropic filtering — 16x.
    • Terrain quality — ultra high.
    • The quality of the effects is high.
    • Lighting quality is high.
    • Automatic exposure — enabled.
    • Vignetting — enabled.
    • Antialiasing — SMAA.
    • Visibility range — ultra high.
    • The quality of objects is high.
    • Resolution percentage — 100.


1920×1080

Nominal

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Acceleration

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

The Long Dark



  • Version 1.27.34908.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Field of view — 100
    • Shadows — included.
    • Shadow quality — ultra high.
    • Shadow resolution — ultra high.
    • Texture resolution — 1.
    • Landscape detail — ultra high.
    • The quality of landscape details is ultra high.
    • Complex shading quality (SSAO) — high.
    • Post-processing quality — ultra high.
    • The quality of the traces is ultra high.
    • Shadow rendering distance — 80.
    • Tree draw distance — 1300.
    • Tree transition distance in 2D — 403.
    • Terrain detail rendering distance — 110.
    • Terrain detail density — 80.


1920×1080

Nominal

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Acceleration

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

Geometric mean results of processors in seven games


1920×1080

Nominal

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Acceleration

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

Let’s move on to considering the attractiveness of buying these processors.

To derive the ratio of the cost and performance of the CPU, their weighted average price was taken. The cost in several large Moscow stores was taken and the arithmetic average price tag of processors was calculated on their basis.

  • Core i5-8600K — $278;
  • Core i5-8600 — $252;
  • Core i5-8500 — $211;
  • Core i5-8400 — $196;

  • Core i3-8350K — $190;
  • Core i3-8300 — $164;
  • Core i3-8100 — $124;

  • Ryzen 7 1700X — $334;
  • Ryzen 7 1700 — $312;

  • Ryzen 5 1600X — $221;
  • Ryzen 5 1600 — $201;
  • Ryzen 5 1500X — $178;
  • Ryzen 5 1400 — $163

CPU cost/performance ratio ($/Average FPS)


1920×1080

Nominal

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Acceleration

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


$/Average FPS

Conclusion

According to the diagram of the average geometric performance of processors, it can be seen that all Intel’s new products are harmoniously located in the company’s model range.

In normal operation, the Core i5-8600 and Core i5-8500 shared second place, while the Core i3-8300 secured fourth place overall. After overclocking, the first ones retained their positions, letting the Core i3-8350K into their ranks. The Core i3-8300 naturally dropped to fifth place, but despite this, it still showed impressive performance, especially when compared to overclocked competitors in the AMD Ryzen line.

On the other hand, in terms of price / performance, the heroes of the test did not have enough stars from the sky, but they all turned out to be attractive to buy.

According to the results of this review, we can safely say that Intel has released three interesting and attractive models for the purchase of CPUs on the CPU market. They organically fit into the 8th generation Core line, thanks to which users got more variability when choosing a new processor.

Dmitry Prilepskikh aka
Phoenix

Thank you for your help in preparing the material for publication: donnerjack .